Tag Archives: secretary

Olbermann: Sherrod was ‘Assassinated by Fox News and That Scum Breitbart’

Keith Olbermann interrupted his much-needed vacation Wednesday to surprise his few viewers with a “Special Comment” about the forced resignation of USDA official Shirley Sherrod. Quite predictably, his greater than twelve minute tirade largely focused on Fox News and Andrew Breitbart — the latter repeatedly referred to as “scum” as well as a “pornographer of propaganda” — who he claimed “assassinated” Sherrod. After starting his rant by pompously comparing the former USDA official to Alfred Dreyfus, the French artillery officer falsely accused of treason and sentenced to life imprisonment on Devil’s Island, the “Countdown” host tore into almost everyone on the planet (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):  KEITH OLBERMANN: No matter how much of a stretch it is to compare Shirley Sherrod to Alfred Dreyfus, mistake it not: Shirley Sherrod has been to her own Devil’s Island. And thanks to the perpetual fraud machine that is Fox News and the scum that is this assassin Breitbart, there will be a portion of this country – the mindless, the hateful, the reactionary, the racist – to whom she is forever convicted and ever imprisoned….A reputation assassinated by Fox News, assassinated by that scum Breitbart, assassinated by all their meager-brained imitators on other channels and other websites, their limp fellow travelers who never asked questions first but simply shot and shot and shot and shot and laughed. Let me make this utterly clear: what you see on Fox News, what you read on right-wing websites is the utter and complete perversion of journalism and it can have no place in a civilized society. It is words crashed together never to inform, only to inflame. It is a political guillotine. It is the manipulation of reality to make the racists seem benevolent, and to convict the benevolent as racists, even if her words must be edited, filleted, stripped of all context, rearranged, fabricated and falsified to do so. What you see on Fox News, what you read on right-wing websites is a manipulation, not just of a story, not just on behalf of a political philosophy, manipulation of a society. It’s intentional redirection from reality and progress to a paranoid delusion and the fomenting of hatred of Americans by Americans and nearly every last word of it is never in any tangible sense true. Ask Shirley Sherrod.   C’mon! Dreyfus spent four years of hell on Devil’s Island, and was exonerated eleven years after his conviction. Seems astonishingly extreme to compare what Sherrod has gone through in the past 48 hours to that. The way things are looking, the former USDA official will likely be able to leverage this incident into quite a personal fortune if she plays her cards right. Just imagine the book and movie offers that could be in her future.  But that wasn’t the only absurdity on display Wednesday evening as it really was the height of gall for Olbermann to point fingers at Breitbart for publishing an edited video at his website when two weeks ago the “Countdown” host cherry picked from a Rush Limbaugh radio transcript to make the conservative talk show host look racist. Talk about words being “edited, filleted, stripped of all context, rearranged, fabricated and falsified!” Now that REALLY is the pot calling the kettle black. On that same night, Olbermann also falsified history to mock Nevada senatorial candidate Sharron Angle AND got so many things wrong concerning oil subsidies and BP that PolitiFact almost gave him a “Pants on Fire” rating days later.  As such, Olbermann chastising anyone about journalistic ethics and integrity is like a porn star lecturing teenagers about the virtues of abstinence.   Moving back to Wednesday’s insanity, the “Countdown” host later scolded NAACP President Ben Jealous for not talking to the white farmer that Sherrod spoke of in her March 27 address to the civil rights organization. He did the same for Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack for not looking at the entire video in question. Yet, as he accused seemingly everyone of wrongdoing — which, by the way, included President Obama and MSNBC — Olbermann never once told viewers if HE had spoken to Sherrod, the farmer in question, or seen the entire video. What research had Olbermann done while on vacation to come to the conclusion that Sherrod was 100 percent innocent and all of her accusers — regardless of the ones that are now backpedaling — were 100 percent wrong? Wasn’t Olbermann doing exactly what he was scolding others for: offering an opinion without all the facts? Well, what should we expect of a man so desperately in need of a vacation after only two days off? With this in mind, as much as we’ll miss him, might we suggest he complete his R&R before offering any more “special comments?”  After all, as much as he needed a vacation, America required some time off from his psychotic rantings. Honestly, Keith, two days wasn’t enough. Go back to bed.

Here is the original post:
Olbermann: Sherrod was ‘Assassinated by Fox News and That Scum Breitbart’

Shirley Sherrod Reminds CNN’s Gergen of Nelson Mandela

Exhibiting an extreme case of the media euphoria over Shirley Sherrod’s vindication, moments before Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack appeared before the cameras CNN senior political analyst David Gergen gushed to Rick Sanchez: I have to tell you, Rick, I don’t want to put her on too high a pedestal. I don’t think she would want that. But I kept thinking about Nelson Mandela as I heard her story, because he had to overcome the same sort of hatred on both sides. And he became this larger-than-life figure and I think we all loved him and revered him because he was able to grow like that. And there is that quality about her story. 48 hours without a job just like 27 years in prison. And how did she experience “hatred on both sides?” Gergen continued, at about 4:45 PM EDT Wednesday afternoon on CNN’s Rick’s List: And as you know, so many of us who come from the South have lived with race and have had to sort of struggle, sometimes had to struggle in our souls to reach this plane. And she sort of reached this place of ascendance, which I really respect in her. Being compared to Mandela is the ultimate tribute from a liberal. In the introduction to his book, ‘Mandela’s Way: Fifteen Lessons on Life, Love, and Courage,’ which was published in April, Time magazine Managing Editor Richard Stengel enthused : It is impossible to write about Nelson Mandela these days and not compare him to another potentially transformational black leader, Barack Obama. The parallels are many… While it took twenty-seven years in prison to mold the Nelson Mandela we know, the forty-eight-year-old American President seems to have achieved a Mandela-like temperament without the long years of sacrifice. Obama’s self-discipline, his willingness to listen and to share credit, his inclusion of his rivals in his administration, and his belief that people want things explained, all seem like a twenty-first century version of Mandela’s values and persona.

Read the original:
Shirley Sherrod Reminds CNN’s Gergen of Nelson Mandela

White House apologizes to Shirley Sherrod

This is a good start: At the press briefing just now, Robert Gibbs apeared to extend a heartfelt apology to Shirley Sherrod on behalf of the Obama administration, and promised a look at what went wrong. Interestingly, though, he sidestepped a question about whether fear of the conservative media drove the decision to fire Sherrod before the facts were all in. Here's what Gibbs said, referring to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack: The secretary is trying to reach her. I hope the secretary reaches her soon, and they have an opportunity to talk. The Secretary will apologize for the actions that have taken place over the past 24 to 36 hours. And on behalf of the administration, I offer our apologies. Gibbs also seemed to promise some kind of reckoning as to how the White House botched this mess, though he stopped short of promising anything official: I think everybody has to go back and look at what has happened over the past 24 to 36 hours, and ask ourselves how we got into this. How did we not ask the right questions? How did you all not ask the right questions? How did other people not ask the right questions? When asked directly by a reporter whether the administration had “overreacted” because the White House is “afraid” of the conservative media, Gibbs brushed off the question. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/07/white_house_apologizes_to_shi… added by: unimatrix0

Image Of Impotence: Obama Admin Can’t Get Sherrod On The Phone

Operator, oh could you help me place this call? You see the number on the matchbook is old and faded.  Jim Croce, ‘Operator,’ 1972 The Obama administration, the folks that want to run our health care and who knows how much else of our economy and our lives, can’t get a simple phone call through to one of its former officials. In this afternoon’s press conference, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs repeatedly said that the Obama administration, through the person of its Agriculture Secretary, has tried but failed to have a phone conversation with Shirley Sherrod, the USDA official it forced out yesterday. ROBERT GIBBS: Secretary Vilsack is, has tried and is trying to reach Ms. Sherrod. When the Secretary reaches her, he will apologize for the events of the last few days, and they will talk about their next steps. . . . . GIBBS: The Secretary is trying to reach Ms. Sherrod . . . The next step that has to happen is the Secretary needs to speak with her. And he’s tried to reach her and we hope that they [inaudible]. What an image of impotence.  Will the MSM note it?

Visit link:
Image Of Impotence: Obama Admin Can’t Get Sherrod On The Phone

NBC’s Today Show Inaccurately Blames Fox News for Sherrod Firing

On Wednesday’s Today show, Matt Lauer, Ann Curry and Savannah Guthrie left the impression that Fox News’s criticism of Shirley Sherrod was the reason she lost her job at the Agriculture Department, with Lauer, in his interview with Sherrod, charging: “I don’t know who to blame here, Miss Sherrod. I mean the, the, the activist who put forward this garbage in the first place has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. The cable news network that, that played this garbage on and on and talked about it, has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that.” But Lauer and NBC News, itself, revealed they have their own agenda, by failing to report, as the MRC’s Rich Noyes pointed out , that Fox News didn’t mention the Sherrod story until she had already left her job. However, that didn’t stop Curry from claiming, in the 8am half hour news brief, that: “After the video was used to vilify her on Fox television, she lost her job,” and Guthrie advancing the NAACP’s notion, in her piece, that they had been “snookered” by Fox News. The following is a complete transcript of Guthrie’s set-up piece followed by Lauer’s interview with Sherrod as they were aired on the July 21 Today show: MATT LAUER: Now to the turbulence facing the Obama administration over the resignation of an Agriculture Department official. Was she forced to quit her job for comments that were taken completely out of context? We’re gonna talk to Shirley Sherrod in a moment, but first, NBC’s Savannah Guthrie is at the White House with the latest. Savannah, good morning. [On screen headline: “Race In America, Should Obama Appointee Have Been Forced To Resign?”] SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Good morning to you, Matt. Well these developments are moving really quickly. At first there were condemnations against Shirley Sherrod for alleged racist remarks. But now some of the very first people to rebuke her are now apologizing and over the night the White House directed the agency that fired her to reconsider. This is the video at the center of the controversy. SHIRLEY SHERROD: The first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm- GUTHRIE: First posted on a conservative Web site, it shows Shirley Sherrod, a Georgia-based official with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, an Obama administration appointee, at an NAACP dinner in March of this year describing her reluctance to help a white farmer who came for aid. SHERROD: I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. GUTHRIE: The video became an overnight cable news sensation. BILL O’REILLY: Miss Sherrod must resign immediately. The federal government cannot have skin color deciding any assistance. LAURA INGRAHAM: The question is how many more people like Miss Sherrod exist in the Obama administration? GUTHRIE: The action against Sherrod was quick and decisive. The NAACP condemned her, calling her remarks shameful and intolerable. The USDA asked her to resign. Sherrod says she was driving Monday afternoon when she got the call from an official in Washington. SHERROD: She said, “Well they want you to pull over to the side of the road and submit your resignation.” It was just unbelievable. You know, it was just unbelievable. GUTHRIE: But Sherrod says it was a rush to judgment. The incident she had described at the March NAACP dinner had occurred more than 20 years ago, before she worked for the USDA, and it was a story she told, as an example of overcoming her own prejudices. SHERROD: That’s when it was revealed to me that it’s about poor versus those who have. And in telling that story, how I changed while working with him, I used that to help others to see it’s not about race. GUTHRIE: The farmer who Sherrod is accused of treating unfairly went public Tuesday saying she is no racist and saved his family farm. FARMER: I appreciated everything she done for [us], and we got our farm back. GUTHRIE: Still, in a statement Tuesday, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack stood by his decision to fire Sherrod saying, quote, “We have been working to turn the page on this sordid civil rights record at USDA, and this controversy could make it more difficult to move forward on correcting injustices. But by Tuesday night, the NAACP had reversed course. Officials looked at the full context of her remarks made at the NAACP’s own event, concluded they’d been, quote, “snookered” by Fox News and the conservative activist, who first posted portions of the video. But they acknowledged, they were too quick to condemn. BENJAMIN JEALOUS, NAACP PRESIDENT: We made a mistake here. We have a very good batting average. You know it is near 1,000 but some times we make a mistake and we, and we made one here. GUTHRIE: For Shirley Sherrod, the damage has been done. SHERROD: They called me a racist, of all people. They called me a racist. When you look at my work, when you look at everything I’ve done, you know that I’m not a racist. GUTHRIE: Alright, so initially officials here at the White House said this was solely at the discretion of the Agriculture Secretary, Tom Vilsack. That the President was briefed only afterward, although staff knew something of it, and that he fully stood by the Agriculture Secretary’s decision. However, late last night after the full video was posted on the NAACP Web site, the White House contacted the Agriculture Secretary and encouraged the Agriculture Secretary to take another look. He now says he will, and let me read the statement from Tom Vilsack. He said, quote, “I am, of course, willing and will conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts to ensure to the American people we are providing services in a fair and equitable manner.” But no word yet, Matt, this morning whether or not Shirley Sherrod gets her job back. MATT LAUER: Savannah Guthrie, thank you very much. Shirley Sherrod is with us now from Atlanta. Miss Sherrod, good morning to you. SHIRLEY SHERROD: Good morning. LAUER: What a 24-48 hours you’ve had. I mean let’s go through it here. You were villainized, you were forced to resign, and then when, when even the most elementary level of investigation was put toward your situation, what I like to call the “oopses!” began. The NAACP, which had originally come out against you, apologized saying they made a mistake and now I even understand that the Agriculture Secretary who originally stood by his decision, has said he’s willing to see more information. Can you describe your emotions as we sit here and talk this morning? SHERROD: You know, it’s so hard looking at the last 24 hours. When the department, when, you know, this first came to light I said to them you need to look at the whole thing. That’s not the message I was putting out there. And for them, all day yesterday, to say they were standing by their decision and now, you know, at this late hour to be saying they are now willing to look at the facts, you know, it’s hard to take at this point. LAUER: What’s outrageous about this is this story, that was sent out there as an example of racism on your part was the opposite. It was a story of enlightenment and transformation of overcoming the narrow mindedness that you had been surrounded by as a younger woman and here it was completely misconstrued and misrepresented. SHERROD: Yes, and I couldn’t get people, I couldn’t get the people I was working with, people who should have listened to me, to see that because that was one of the things I kept saying. You need to look at the whole thing. That’s not my message. That’s not me. If you look at my life, if you look at my life’s work, you would know that, that’s not me. [On screen headline: “Race In America, Obama Appointee Forced To Resign Speaks Out”] LAUER: As a state worker in Georgia, you tell this story about how you were dealing with a white farmer who was about to lose his farm and perhaps the temptation was there on your part to continue down the road, you had seen so many travel in the past and maybe not give that farmer, that white person, all the benefit of your help. But you had this, almost an epiphany at that moment- SHERROD: Yes. LAUER: -and said, “Wait a second, the civil rights movement was not about black versus white. It’s about the poor and the powerless and this man deserves as much help as anyone.” I mean did, could anyone who had listened, who would have listened to the entire story have, have thought of you as a racist? SHERROD: I don’t think they would have. I don’t, if, you know, anyone, you know, most people would not have known me but if they had looked at the entire tape, I just don’t see how they could’ve come away with it, thinking I was a racist. LAUER: I don’t who to blame- SHERROD: You know those- LAUER: I don’t know who to blame here, Miss Sherrod. I mean the, the, the activist who put forward this garbage in the first place has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. SHERROD: Right. LAUER: The cable news network that, that played this garbage on and on and talked about it, has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. I am shocked at the NAACP, I have to admit. That, that- SHERROD: Yes. LAUER: -that they did not investigate further before condemning you. And I’m shocked at the Obama administration for not putting an investigation in place either. Can you give me your thoughts on that? SHERROD: Yes. I was particularly hurt by the NAACP’s reaction to it because if they – you know, I put years, all of my life has been about civil rights work and fairness. And if they had just taken the time to look at it, to see, to look at me, to, to see what I’ve done, I’m certain they would not have come out with that first statement. But I can appreciate the fact that they now have looked at it, they’ve seen, and they come up with a new statement. I can accept the apology. LAUER: And as for the Obama administration, as for the Obama administration, why do you think the Secretary of Agriculture acted so quickly in this situation? SHERROD: You know, that is so hard to, to, to take, especially when I kept saying look at the entire thing. Look at my message and no one would listen. No one would listen. LAUER: The NAACP, Miss Sherrod, now calls this “a teachable moment.”What lessons have you learned? SHERROD: Oh, gosh. You know, the, it’s, it’s the outpouring of support has just been great for me. To, you know, I don’t know that I would have done anything different because this is just me. This is my life. It’s all about fairness. And then to not be treated fairly, you know, in this whole situation is, is, it’s, it’s just something hard to deal with. LAUER: The door seems to be open a little bit to you getting your, your old job back. Do you want to walk through that door? SHERROD: You know, I am just not sure of how I would be treated there now. That’s, that’s, that’s one I just don’t know at this point. LAUER: Shirley Sherrod. Miss Sherrod I thank you for your time this morning. SHERROD: Thank you.

Read the original post:
NBC’s Today Show Inaccurately Blames Fox News for Sherrod Firing

Nathan Deal wife Sandra Deal

Georgia Gubernatorial Republican candidate Nathan Deal and his wife Sandra Deal wait for election results as Deal seems poised for the Republican run-off at Deal#39;s campaign headquarters in Gainesville, Ga. on Tuesday, July 20, 2010. Deal is hoping for a strong showing in his former congressional district. Nathan Deal has won the second Republican runoff spot in the race for governor. The former congressman from Gainesville will face former Secretary of State Karen Handel in an Aug. 10 runof

Go here to read the rest:
Nathan Deal wife Sandra Deal

You Just Lived Through the Hottest June in Global Recorded History | CNN/NOAA

You just lived through hottest June in recorded history Report: Warmest June on record globally By Angela Fritz, CNN Meteorologist July 18, 2010 5:10 p.m. EDT Photo: New Yorkers in the Bronx seek refuge from the heat June 10. . STORY HIGHLIGHTS * Report says warmer-than-average conditions were present globally in June * Australia continues to suffer from below-average rainfall * Arctic sea ice reached a record low for the month of June (CNN) — Last month was the warmest June on record worldwide, according to a report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Warmer-than-average conditions were present across nearly all continents, including much of the United States, according to the organization's State of the Climate report, released Friday. Although global sea surface temperatures ranked the fourth-warmest on record, the combination of land and sea anomalies pushed June 2010 past June 2005, previously the warmest June on record, the report said. June was also the fourth consecutive month in a row of record warmth worldwide. Meanwhile, wetter-than-average conditions were present in southern India, southern China, southern Europe and the U.S. Midwest, the report said. In contrast, southwest Australia is experiencing record-setting rainfall deficiencies, with the lowest rainfall on record for the first half of the year, according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. The Bureau reported that all states and territories in Australia experienced drier-than-average conditions in June. June also marked a record low in Arctic sea ice — the 19th June in a row the sea ice has been below average. “This is important, because sea ice reflects incoming solar radiation back to space,” said CNN Meteorologist Taylor Ward. “Without the normal extent of sea ice in the Arctic, we can expect more radiation to be absorbed into the ocean, leading to more melting. It's what we call a 'positive feedback.'” The amount of sea ice in the Arctic has been steadily declining since 1990. Warmer-than-average temperatures in the equatorial Pacific, also known as El Nino, have been contributing to the warmth. La Nina conditions — cooler-than-average temperatures in the same region — are beginning to set in, which could prevent more monthly records from being set. However, La Nina combined with record-setting warm Atlantic sea surface temperatures is expected to fuel an active Atlantic hurricane season. The announcement of June's record-setting warmth comes during a period of extreme heat in the United States and Europe. Excessive heat warnings have been topping weather headlines in the United States for more than two weeks now, and Europe has been shattering temperature records as well, with a heat wave through the first half of July. Eastern Europe has seen the most significant temperatures, although much of the continent has experienced above-average heat. added by: EthicalVegan

Top-Secret America Spiraling Out of Control‎

A hidden world, growing beyond control The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work. These are some of the findings of a two-year investigation by The Washington Post that discovered what amounts to an alternative geography of the United States, a Top Secret America hidden from public view and lacking in thorough oversight. After nine years of unprecedented spending and growth, the result is that the system put in place to keep the United States safe is so massive that its effectiveness is impossible to determine. The investigation's other findings include: * Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States. * An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances. * In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings – about 17 million square feet of space. * Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks. * Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year – a volume so large that many are routinely ignored. These are not academic issues; lack of focus, not lack of resources, was at the heart of the Fort Hood shooting that left 13 dead, as well as the Christmas Day bomb attempt thwarted not by the thousands of analysts employed to find lone terrorists but by an alert airline passenger who saw smoke coming from his seatmate. They are also issues that greatly concern some of the people in charge of the nation's security. “There has been so much growth since 9/11 that getting your arms around that – not just for the DNI [Director of National Intelligence], but for any individual, for the director of the CIA, for the secretary of defense – is a challenge,” Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said in an interview with The Post last week. In the Department of Defense, where more than two-thirds of the intelligence programs reside, only a handful of senior officials – called Super Users – have the ability to even know about all the department's activities. But as two of the Super Users indicated in interviews, there is simply no way they can keep up with the nation's most sensitive work. “I'm not going to live long enough to be briefed on everything” was how one Super User put it. The other recounted that for his initial briefing, he was escorted into a tiny, dark room, seated at a small table and told he couldn't take notes. Program after program began flashing on a screen, he said, until he yelled ''Stop!” in frustration. “I wasn't remembering any of it,” he said. Underscoring the seriousness of these issues are the conclusions of retired Army Lt. Gen. John R. Vines, who was asked last year to review the method for tracking the Defense Department's most sensitive programs. Vines, who once commanded 145,000 troops in Iraq and is familiar with complex problems, was stunned by what he discovered. picture: http://warisboring.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/top-secret.jpg READ MORE AT LINK: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/a-hidden-world-gr… added by: pinkpanther

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Spins for Obama: ‘Set Aside’ Last Two Terror Attacks

Good Morning America’s George Stephanopoulos on Monday lobbied that if one were to “set aside” the Fort Hood terror attack and the botched Christmas bombing, there haven’t been successful attacks on America in the last few years. Stephanopoulos was talking to William Arkin, the co-author of a new Washington Post  investigation into the top secret agencies created in the wake of 9/11. The GMA host began by asserting, “I spoke with an administration official early this morning.” Putting a positive spin on Obama’s first 18 months, he trumpeted, ” And that if you set aside the Fort Hood bombing in Texas and the failed Christmas bomber, there has not been a major attack that’s been anything close to successful on American soil. ” Arkin dryly responded that it’s “always good to set aside the things that are most significant” in order to focus on good news. After the Washington Post journalist mentioned the problems that led up to the Fort Hood slaughter, Stephanopoulos again defended Obama: “That’s been conceded by the administration. But, the President came out, ordered a review and they’ve now have addressed those problems, haven’t they?” The ABC anchor did challenge Arkin on whether or not it’s right for the Post to reveal such secret information. However, Stephanopoulos seemed more interested in defending the Obama administration’s handling of terrorist incidents. As for the reference to his “administration official,” NewsBusters readers will remember the 2009 revelation that the journalist has daily chats with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. A transcript of the July 19 segment, which aired at 7:12am EDT, follows: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: We’re going to turn now to a revealing new national security investigation into the government’s efforts to prevent another major terror attack o American soil. The Washington Post begins a three-part investigation today into the national security system set up in response to the 9/11 attacks. And what they discovered it startling. The series is called Top Secret America and its co-author William Arkin joins us now. And, Bill, thanks for joining us this morning. What I was most struck by in reading your piece in the Washington Post is how vast this apparatus has become, more than 850,000 people working across 1200 government agencies. 1,900 private companies in 10,000 locations. You know, that’s a lot for people at home to absorb. So, for everyone trying to get a handling on this, what the single most important thing they need to know about this top secret America? WILLIAM ARKIN (Washington Post): Well, George, thank you for having me on. I think that the reality for Americans is we’ve done exactly what America does best. But, now, ten years after 9/11, we ask to ask ourselves whether or not this gigantic system that we’ve created for counter-terrorism provides us both value in terms of money and also makes us safer. And one of the things we’ve learned in the two-year investigation is that the evidence shows that no one is really in a position of confidence to say that we are safer today than we were ten years ago. STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you say that. Yet, I spoke with an administration official early this morning who pointed out that, number one, at least half of al Qaeda’s top 20 have been taken out since 9/11. And that if you set aside the Fort Hood bombing in Texas and the failed Christmas bomber there has not been a major attack that’s been anything close to successful on American soil. ARKIN: Well, I think it’s always good to set aside the things that are most significant in terms of countering what is that the government would like to put out as the good news. The evidence shows that, in fact, in the case of Major Hasan in Fort Hood last year, that the vast apparatus of counterintelligence and force protection on the part of the military completely and you utterly failed to detect someone who was right inside the ranks of the U.S. Army. And I think that’s a massive failure. So I’m not comforted at all by that. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s been conceded by the administration. But, the President came out, ordered a review and they’ve now have addressed those problems, haven’t they? ARKIN: Well, I’m not sure I could say they’ve addressed those problems. One of the things that we’ve learned in this investigation, George, in getting on the record interviews with Secretary Gates, the Secretary of Defense, with Panetta, the head of the CIA, with the top two intelligence officials of the U.S. government. On the record they’ve all basically conceded this is a system which has grown so fast that no one really has a full handle on it, no one really is fully charge of it. And they basically agreed with our conclusions that they themselves, even within their agencies are not able to determine all of the redundant work that’s being done and whether or not it can be done in better ways. STEPHANOPOULOS: Although Dennis Blair, who’s head of intelligence, was head of intelligence, said that this is not redundancy, it’s actually tailored intelligence. But, I want to get to a separate point. You also reveal the existence of several secret sites in places like shopping malls. And one other problem the administration has with your report is that they say the very existence of this database that you’ve created is troubling, that it’s a road map, could be a road map, to our adversaries that could be very easily altered as well. ARKIN: Well, George, we’ve been working on this project for two years. We’ve been through months now of negotiations with the government. I don’t think that there’s anything in here that would do harm to U.S. national security. And, frankly, I’m an American as well. And I don’t want to do any harm to American national security. The reality is, that for people to really have an understanding of the system that’s been created since 9/11, they need to have the facts. And one of the things that we were able to do in this investigation is both write stories that explain to people this incredibly complex system. But, also, at the same time, show them so they can somehow be vested in the decision about either going to war or continuing the war or what their government is doing.

Read the rest here:
ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Spins for Obama: ‘Set Aside’ Last Two Terror Attacks

No Media Outcry as Democrats Block Amendment to Open Up Gulf Oil Cleanup to Press

It has become clear that the Democratic establishment does not have as much of an interest in press freedom as they would have the public believe. But what is even more telling is the media’s spotty response to censorship efforts in the Gulf of Mexico. On Wednesday, House Natural Resouces Democrats rejected an amendment that would ensure press transparency in the Gulf. The amendment came mere days after the Coast Guard rescinded a policy keeping journalists at least 65 feet from “essential recovery efforts.” Offered by Rep. Paul Broun, pictured right, the amendment stated : “Except in cases of imminent harm to human life, federal officials shall allow free and open access to the media of oil spill clean up activity occurring on public lands or public shorelines, including the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill.” Since the amendment’s defeat, the response from the mainstream press has been a deafening silence . Democrats ruled it was not germane to the legislation at hand, the Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources (CLEAR) Act. That might seem like a plausible explanation for Democrats’ rejection of the Broun amendment, but as the Washington Examiner’s Mark Hemingway noted, there was a “wide array of items being attached to the bill that are of no particular relevance to the gulf oil spill.” In fact, Republicans offered an amendment specifically designed to remove provisons they called “unrelated to offshore drilling and the Gulf oil spill response or require additional information and facts from multiple ongoing investigations.” These items include a $150 million annual authorization for the next 30 years for the Historic Preservation Fund, which provides grants to states and localities to preserve historic landmarks. Other items, according to a Committee statement , include Renewable Energy. An entire section of this bill is exclusively dedicated to onshore renewable energy. Wind turbines and solar panels hundreds of miles away from the Gulf have absolutely nothing to do with a leaking deepwater oil well that is 5,000 feet under the ocean floor. Onshore Energy Development. Rather than just focusing on offshore drilling, the bill makes numerous changes to onshore energy development. These policies will do nothing to help clean up the Gulf, but will seriously impact onshore American energy production leading to higher energy prices and lost jobs. Aquaculture. The bill restricts the ability of the Secretary of Commerce and Regional Fishery Management Councils from developing or approving any fishery management plan that permits or regulates offshore aquaculture. In addition, it would nullify any permit for offshore aquaculture already granted by the Secretary. Not only is this unrelated to the oil spill, but could lead to further job loss in the Gulf and potentially hinder fishery restoration activities. Uranium Leasing. The bill amends the Mineral Leasing Act to make uranium a leasable mineral, subject to rental and royalty rates. Creating a new uranium leasing program will not help respond to the crisis in the Gulf, but will make uranium, which is used to produce carbon-free nuclear energy, more expensive and difficult to mine. Wildlife Sustainability. A provision in this bill calls for the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to help maintain sustainable populations of native and desire non-native plants and animals on lands under their jurisdiction. Managing onshore federal lands for wildlife has nothing to do with offshore drilling or Gulf Coast restoration. “Looking at the number of largely unrelated items that are actually in the bill,” wrote the Wasington Examiner’s Mark Hemingway, it’s hard to see the rejection of Broun’s amendment as anything other than political. Democrats seem far more concerned about how unrestricted press coverage of the oil spill might affect their political fortunes than whether or not amendments to the CLEAR Act have to be “germane.” For his part, Broun touted the necessity of his amendment as reinforcing the press’s role as a safeguard against malfeasance on the part of the Obama administration — you know, the check on power that journalists are so proud to provide. Anderson Cooper had made a similar statement regarding the Coast Guard’s now-defunct policy. Broun said in a statement , There have been several accounts of the Obama Administration restricting access and stopping the press from thoroughly reporting on this oil spill. The media has a responsibility to not only accurately report the news but to keep everyone associated with the spill accountable. President Obama promised transparency, but we have seen numerous examples where that is not the case. There is no excuse for reporters and photographers to be denied access to public places unless their life is in imminent danger. This amendment is necessary in order to eliminate any confusion and ensure that First Amendment rights truly are protected. As I reminded readers in a previous post , a number of organizations devoted to ensuring press freedom were up in arms after Hurricane Katrina at a FEMA policy that forbade journalists from embedding on rescue missions, citing the safety of those reporters and the victims being rescued. In an attempt to address similar concerns, Broun’s amendment makes sure to issue the caveat, “Except in cases of imminent harm to human life.” The amendment was still rejected. We will see if those same watchdog organizations take notice. For its part, the mainstream press is conspicuously silent on the Broun amendment’s defeat.

Read the original:
No Media Outcry as Democrats Block Amendment to Open Up Gulf Oil Cleanup to Press