Tag Archives: sexual-harassment

TMZ Live: Jesse James, Conrad Murray & Bieber

Filed under: TMZ Live Harvey and Mike took your questions on everything today — including Joe Jackson’s lawsuit against Dr. Conrad Murray, episodes canceled on “Two and Half Men,” and Jesse James’ sexual harassment settlement. Plus: Justin Bieber’s manager turning … Permalink

Original post:
TMZ Live: Jesse James, Conrad Murray & Bieber

Disney Bans Fake Boobs from Pirates [Boobs]

If this catches on, half of Hollywood’s females will fall into poverty. Casting for their fourth Pirates of the Caribbean , Disney specifies that fake breasts are not permitted, and actresses will be subjected to pre-shoot jiggle tests to check. This sounds like the beginning of a porno, doesn’t it? The New York Post reports: The filmmakers sent out a casting call last week seeking “beautiful female fit models. Must be 5ft7in-5ft8in, size 4 or 6, no bigger or smaller. Age 18-25. Must have a lean dancer body. Must have real breasts. Do not submit if you have implants .” And they warn that there’ll be a “show and tell” day. To make sure LA talent scouts don’t get caught in a “booby trap,” potential lassies will have to undergo a Hollywood-style jiggle-your-jugs test and jog for judges. If there’s nothing moving from the waist up, they’re saying, it’s a dead giveaway that you’re not all flesh and bones—and you’re out. How is that not sexual harassment? On the other hand: Is there any way to prove veracity of breasts without sexually harassing? In case Disney meets any ambiguous jiggle tests, here are a few other ways I have thought of to test for veracity of breasts: Force actresses to answer, “Have you ever met Hugh Hefner?” Compare and contrast lie detector result for “Are your breasts real?” with “Are you a natural blonde?” Introduce the actresses to Donald Trump. Anyone he is attracted to can be eliminated prima facie. You’ll have to sign an NDA once you read this, but: Dr. 90210: Silicone Victims Unit All of this raises a rather perplexing question, though. America loves fake boobs . Entire careers have revolved around fake boobs . So why would Disney ban them from Pirates ? First, there’s this: “In the last movie, there were enhanced breasts to give that 18th-century whorish look, and men were pretty well padded too, and no one worried,” a former casting agent said. “But times are changing, and the audience can spot false breasts.” Also, there is going to be lots of swimming and diving in this movie, and remember the Road Rules lady who bellyflopped and popped her implant ? Do not try Baywatch at home, ladies. [ NYPost ]

Here is the original post:
Disney Bans Fake Boobs from Pirates [Boobs]

The Scandalous Scott Brown Lawsuit that No One Told You About [Exclusive]

Did you know that Scott Brown —the new star Republican Senator—was accused of harassing a female campaign worker in 1998? We have the documents to prove it. Did the Democrats blow an opportunity to keep their 60th Senate seat? In 2000, Scott Brown was a freshman state representative in Massachusetts. A few years earlier, he’d served on the Wrentham, Mass. Board of Selectmen. Jennifer Firth , a local mortgage banker who was elected to the Board of Selectmen in 1999, filed a civil defamation suit against Brown in July of 2000, alleging that he had harassed her when she worked on his campaign in 1998, and then tried to smear her reputation around town with forged letters and emails. According to Firth’s complaint, Brown engaged in “offensive” conduct that caused her to quit his campaign; he then tried to “defame and humiliate” her by spreading rumors to her colleagues that she “had made sexual advances” towards him during his campaign. She also alleged that Brown told several people that he’d had an “intimate relationship” with her and that he had a stack of sexually explicit letters that Firth had sent him. In her suit, Firth says that she’d never been sexually intimate with Brown, nor did she ever send him the aforementioned letters. A 2000 article in the local paper , the Sun Chronicle , reported that Brown had denied the charges; for her part, Firth said she felt that filing the suit was “the only way I could stop this.” The case then took a strange turn. Two days after the lawsuit was filed, Jennifer Firth’s lawyer, Harvey Schwartz , filed a motion to withdraw as her counsel, saying that “to the best of [Schwartz’s] knowledge, information and belief, the above allegations [by Firth] are not supported by ‘good grounds.'” The next day, Jennifer Firth withdrew her suit . It was dismissed with prejudice, which means it can never be re-filed. Brown told a local newspaper that her lawyer had decided to withdraw after he was presented with letters and e-mail messages that proved she’d been harassing Brown. The day after she dropped her suit, Firth claimed she’d done so because “her lawyer told her she was unlikely to win it.” Firth’s story is certainly an odd one. Why would she have gone to the trouble of filing a suit against Brown only to drop the case so soon afterward? And if Brown had any evidence to support his claim that it was Firth who had been harassing him, why did he never release it publicly? To be sure, it’s possible there was no merit to Firth’s case. And it’s worth noting that Firth has had other brushes with controversy in her county. But why did Democrats and members of the national press fail to even bring up the fact that Scott Brown had once been accused of sexual harassment and defamation in the myriad stories about him prior to Massachusetts’ special election in January? Google it. The entire incident is conspicuously absent. Consider the political stakes. Coakley’s loss cost Democrats their 60th Senate seat, endangering a long list of President Obama’s political objectives such as health care reform. Yet Martha Coakley, the state’s Democratic attorney general who ran against Brown, never mentioned the issue on the campaign trail, as far as we can tell. Did the Coakley campaign look into the case and decide Firth’s claims were baseless? Did they miss it entirely? The Democratic leadership in Washington did not, as far as we can tell, raise the harassment claim at any point during the election, even though it could have been used to raise doubts about Brown in the lead up to what was a very close election. Firth’s charges may have been baseless. But many politicians have seen their political prospects damaged by far less than allegations contained in an actual lawsuit. Why didn’t White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel feed this to liberal media outlets in an effort to discredit Brown? Clearly, if the situation were reversed and it had it been a Democrat in a high-profile special election who had a harassment and defamation suit in his past, the story would have been a talking point on Fox News for weeks. We’ve left messages for Senator Brown, Jennifer Firth, and her former lawyer Harvey Schwartz. We’ve yet to hear back from any of them. DOCUMENTS: Firth’s complaint, her lawyer’s withdrawal, and the subsequent dismissal of the case. [ Photos of Brown and Coakley via Getty Images ]

Continue reading here:
The Scandalous Scott Brown Lawsuit that No One Told You About [Exclusive]

The Sick Orders of the World’s Most Heinous Boss

The FBI is investigating possible insider trading at hedge fund SAC Capital, but the most outrageous thing to emerge from the case are allegations of how a perverse SAC manager tried to literally turn a trader into his literal bitch.

View post:
The Sick Orders of the World’s Most Heinous Boss

Lost Star Makes Sex Suit Disappear

So it’s settled then. The sexual harassment suit against Lost star Henry Ian Cusick is finished, according to a notice of settlement filed Oct. 19

Follow this link:
Lost Star Makes Sex Suit Disappear

Worldwide Pants’ Sex Policy — Yes Means Yes

TMZ has obtained the sexual harassment policy statement for David Letterman’s production company, Worldwide Pants — and what’s NOT in the document is more interesting than what is. Nothing in the document prohibits an employee from gettin’ down with … Permalink

Read more:
Worldwide Pants’ Sex Policy — Yes Means Yes

Network Speaks Out on David Letterman Extortion Case

The CBS network is speaking out on the arrest of Robert J. Halderman for allegedly trying to blackmail David Letterman for $2 million. Halderman, a producer for the television show “48 Hours,” was arrested Thursday.

See the original post:
Network Speaks Out on David Letterman Extortion Case

Letterman creates brilliant hour of TV from woes

It was business as usual for David Letterman and CBS’ “Late Show.” The band played. The host, dapper as always in a well-tailored suit, recited his monologue; some jokes hit, some missed. Then Letterman proceeded to take viewers, and television, on an extraordinary journey that was part confessional, part entertainment and wholly, if jarringly, hypnotic

Read the original here:
Letterman creates brilliant hour of TV from woes

The David Letterman Blackmail, Sex Scandal: What’s Your Take?

No matter how you felt about David Letterman prior to his role in a recent extortion plot , or how you feel about him now that he’s admitted to an affair with a staffer, we can all agree on one thing: The talk show host’s public admission was gripping television. Countless celebrities have been caught in sex scandals; but we can’t recall a single one that sat for 10 minutes in front of the camera and a stunned studio audience – as the host of a comedic program, no less – and divulged the details of his affair in such a manner.

See the original post here:
The David Letterman Blackmail, Sex Scandal: What’s Your Take?