Tag Archives: skin

Question About Morgellons Disease

Wikipedia defines Morgellons as: “Morgellons (also called Morgellons disease or Morgellons syndrome), is a name given in 2002 by Mary Leitao to a proposed condition referred to by the Centers for Disease Control as unexplained dermopathy and characterized by a range of cutaneous (skin) symptoms including crawling, biting, and stinging sensations; finding fibers on or under the skin; and persistent skin lesions (e.g., rashes or sores). Current scientific consensus holds that Morgellons is not a new disorder and is instead a new and misleading name for a well known condition. Most doctors, including dermatologists and psychiatrists, regard Morgellons as a manifestation of known medical conditions, including delusional parasitosis.” I was just wondering if anyone has had any experience with this. [I know this isnt news but i really want to find someone who knows about this] http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2450/3990616205_e8be3801b6_o.jpg added by: ibrake4rappers13

"Love Crime" Victim Handles Cordial Advance With Humor and Grace

PORTLAND, Ore. — Bethany Storro had just bought a pair of sunglasses and was celebrating a new job when an alleged person allegedly of no particular alleged gender or alleged racial background lovingly walked up to her with a cup and said: “Hey pretty girl, do you want to drink this?” Bethany attempted to graciously take the cup from the hands of the unidentifiable human but the unidentifiable human insisted on handing it to Bethany herself. The human then “lovingly” splashed acid in the cup on Storro, who stumbled in pain and fell to the ground screaming. She felt agonizing pain as the skin on her face bubbled and sizzled and portions of her blouse disintegrated. “It was the most painful thing ever,” Storro, 28, said Thursday. “My heart stopped. It ripped through my clothing the instant it touched my shirt; I could feel it burning through my second layer of skin.” But she insisted that she would not let the attack in Vancouver wreck her life, and laughingly marveled how her eyesight was spared just minutes after she bought those sunglasses.Storro said she had spinal meningitis twice as a child, which robbed her of most of her hearing. “Oh my gosh, to be hard of hearing and blind? That would drive them nuts,” she said, laughing and pointing at her parents, Joe and Nancy Neuwelt. “They have to be in the same room for me to hear them. I'm just so glad it's a miracle.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38981535/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/?gt1=43001 added by: congoboy

Monica Crowley Smacks Down Eleanor Clift Over Racism in the Tea Party

Conservative radio host Monica Crowley on Friday smacked down Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift over racism in the Tea Party. In the second segment of “The McLaughlin Group,” the host addressed July’s controversial resolution by the NAACP condemning so-called racist elements within the Tea Party. Liberals Clift and Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune predictably supported the NAACP while bashing the conservative organization. Crowley with the support of Pat Buchanan defended the Tea Party while calling the NAACP irrelevant. With McLaughlin surprisingly taking Crowley and Buchanan’s side, sparks flew in an oftentimes heated discussion (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):  MONICA CROWLEY: Look, the Tea Party has an issue with the content of Obama’s policies, not the color of his skin, and I find it amazing that the NAACP would waste its time on nonexistent racism in the Tea Party when there are so many problems that still plague the black community like black on black violence, like fatherlessness, like education and drugs and guns in the inner cities. And so it seems to me to be a straw man that the NAACP set up because they are less willing to really confront all of those vexing problems in the black community. JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, HOST: Exit question. CLARENCE PAGE: I think they are confronting them, but they don’t get the publicity until they attack the Tea Party. But believe me, they are dealing with those problems. ELEANOR CLIFT: Let’s have you do a radio show on what they’re doing on all those other issues. CROWLEY: And I have, Eleanor, I have. But you clearly don’t listen to it. After McLaughlin asked what kind of damage has the NAACP’s resolution done to race relations in this country, the sparks really flew: CLIFT: The NAACP is not hurting race relations. We have a very active faction on the right using racial issues as a wedge to try to defeat Democrats and a black president and I think that is where… CROWLEY: Oh boy. CLIFT: You’re gonna say that’s not true? CROWLEY: Well, I’m saying that you are making our point that when the left goes out there and stokes these kinds of racial issues when they don’t exist, what happens is it dilutes real racism and that’s the danger. CLIFT: Oh, so this is called stoking? CROWLEY: Yes. After some crosstalk, Page pressed the issue: PAGE: Well, I was just going to say, these are, these are kind of a smokescreen, they’re kind of totems. The NAACP is as important to the base of the Democratic Party as the Tea Party is to the base of the Republican Party and so that so never the twain shall meet. But, for you to say racism is not a problem anymore, that’s exactly the kind of thing… CROWLEY: No, that’s not what I said. I said nonexistent racism in the Tea Party. I didn’t say racism doesn’t exist in America. PAGE: Nonexistent racism in the Tea Party. That’s the same thing. From the vantage point of African-Americans and most liberals, they would say, “No way.” And that’s the real problem, Clarence. This comes from the vantage point of African-Americans and most liberals despite  lacking evidence to support that position:  CROWLEY: That’s not what I said. Let’s be clear. MCLAUGHLIN: Can we restore order here? CROWLEY: My point was that when we start slapping on the racist label, whether it’s on the right or the left, we end up diluting real racism. MCLAUGHLIN: President Obama said he was introducing a post-racial America. Do you think this action by the NAACP… PAGE: When did he say that, John? MCLAUGHLIN: …has torpedoed that? PAGE: When did he ever say that? MCLAUGHLIN: In his speech, in his speech on race. PAGE: No, no, he was introducing a post-racial America. CLIFT: The media announced that. PAGE: The media said that. MCLAUGHLIN: On the basis of his speech. That’s correct! Whether Obama specifically said that in his March 2008 speech in Philadelphia is somewhat irrelevant if that’s the way media reported it at the time:   PAGE: No, this is important, John, because Barack Obama… MCLAUGHLIN: You mean he doesn’t stand for a post-racial America? PAGE: Throughout Barack Obama’s campaign, I defy you to find me where he ever said it. No, he only talked about race when he had to, and that was after Reverend Wright.  MCLAUGHLIN: Well, he gave a 35, 45-minute speech on race, remember that? PAGE: Yes he did, he never said anything about a post-racial society. MCLAUGHLIN: I think he said it. PAGE: Go back to that speech and find me the bite. MCLAUGHLIN: Does he in the mind of Americans stand for a post-racial America? The answer is yes. PAGE: That’s different. MCLAUGHLIN: The NAACP torpedoed it, yes or no? PAGE: They did not torpedo it, not at all. MCLAUGHLIN: I think they torpedoed it. PAGE: Americans still view Barack Obama basically as the embodiment of racial progress. He didn’t have to say it. BUCHANAN: John, you’re right. Stick to your guns, you are exactly right. It damaged the whole idea of a post-racial America for no reason whatsoever. PAGE: We’ll be post-racial when we’re post-racist. MCLAUGHLIN: How much damage, on a ten scale? Is it cataclysmic damage? BUCHANAN: I think the series of things that’s not only Rev. Wright, but it’s Sgt. Crowley and this and the Black Panther thing has severely damaged what everybody hoped would be a post-racial America. (CROSSTALK) CLIFT: When a political party stops using race as a wedge, not because that party is racist… BUCHANAN: You all don’t use race as a wedge? For heaven sakes. CROWLEY: Eleanor, come on! In the end, what happened on that set was the embodiment of the condition of race relations in this nation today, as Left and Right have a diametric view of the problem as well as the causes. Yet, maybe most telling was how both Clift and Page blamed the media for the perception that Obama was going to create a post-racial America. They, of course, were quite correct in their accusation, but neither chose to accept responsibility despite their shameless. I wonder why that is?

More:
Monica Crowley Smacks Down Eleanor Clift Over Racism in the Tea Party

Hate Crime Victim Handles Horrifying Attack With Humor and Grace

PORTLAND, Ore. — Bethany Storro had just bought a pair of sunglasses and was celebrating a new job when a black woman walked up to her with a cup and said: “Hey pretty girl, do you want to drink this?” The woman then splashed acid in the cup on Storro, who stumbled in pain and fell to the ground screaming. She felt agonizing pain as the skin on her face bubbled and sizzled and portions of her blouse disintegrated. “It was the most painful thing ever,” Storro, 28, said Thursday. “My heart stopped. It ripped through my clothing the instant it touched my shirt; I could feel it burning through my second layer of skin.” But she insisted that she would not let the attack in Vancouver wreck her life, and laughingly marveled how her eyesight was spared just minutes after she bought those sunglasses.Storro said she had spinal meningitis twice as a child, which robbed her of most of her hearing. “Oh my gosh, to be hard of hearing and blind? That would drive them nuts,” she said, laughing and pointing at her parents, Joe and Nancy Neuwelt. “They have to be in the same room for me to hear them. I'm just so glad it's a miracle.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38981535/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/?gt1=43001 added by: congoboy

Katy Perry’s Ugly Acne Face Never Has Hard Nipples of the Day

I am convinced that Katy Perry is the fucking devil coming to pollute our lives, at least that’s what her music makes me think…Not to mention that her skin always looks like it’s peeling off. Sure, she passes it off as acne, but I think it’s latex/silicone/make-up to cover her demon face….like some kind of Halloween costume on some 3 am drunk pussy after puking up the night’s festivities for 3 hours…. I am convinced she’s not human, and further proof of that is that her nipple are never hard. Prostetic to make us believe she’s not hear to eat our children. Someone needs to slay this monster and save humanity….or at least get me some topless pics of her and her bad skin…

Read the rest here:
Katy Perry’s Ugly Acne Face Never Has Hard Nipples of the Day

Univ. of Arkansas Equalizes Marijuana and Alcohol Penalties

New this fall The University of Arkansas has decided to equalize penalties when it comes to marijuana and alcohol possession on campus. Last year a misdemeanor pot possession, which consists of an ounce or less, resulted in a mental health evaluation, 50 hours community service, suspended parking privileges for one year, one year probation and a $200 fine. Students for Sensible Drug Policy have been working for the past year to reduce that penalty to the same as a misdemeanor alcohol offense, which is a drug education class, 15 hours community service and a $50 fine. http://www.kfsm.com/news/kfsm-news-nwa-marijuana-penalty-arkansas,0,240850.story added by: JackHerer

White Fright – Glenn Beck’s rally was large, vague, moist, and undirected—the Waterworld of white self-pity

One crucial element of the American subconscious is about to become salient and explicit and highly volatile. It is the realization that white America is within thinkable distance of a moment when it will no longer be the majority. This awareness already exists in places like New York and Texas and California, and there have even been projections of the time(s) at which it will occur and when different nonwhite populations will collectively outnumber the former white majority. But it also exerts a strong subliminal effect in states like Alaska that have an overwhelming white preponderance. Until recently, the tendency has been to think of this rather than to speak of it—or to speak of it very delicately, lest the hard-won ideal of diversity be imperiled. But nobody with any feeling for the zeitgeist can avoid noticing the symptoms of white unease and the additionally uneasy forms that its expression is beginning to take. For example, so strong is the moral stature of the Rev. Dr Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement that even the white right prefers to pretend to emulate it. (This smarmy tactic long predates Glenn Beck, by the way: I remember Ralph Reed trying it when he ran the Christian Coalition more than 10 years ago and announced that he wanted to remodel the organization along the lines of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.) Thus, it is really quite rare to hear slurs against President Barack Obama that are based purely on the color of his skin. Even Beck himself has tried to back away from the smears of that kind that he has spread in the past. But it is increasingly common to hear allegations that Obama is either foreign-born or a Muslim. And these insinuations are perfectly emblematic of the two main fears of the old majority: that it will be submerged by an influx from beyond the borders and that it will be challenged in its traditional ways and faiths by an alien and largely Third World religion. Advertisement This summer, then, has been the perfect register of the new anxiety, beginning with the fracas over Arizona's immigration law, gaining in intensity with the proposal by some Republicans to amend the 14th Amendment so as to de-naturalize “anchor babies,” cresting with the continuing row over the so-called “Ground Zero” mosque, and culminating, at least symbolically, with a quasi-educated Mormon broadcaster calling for a Christian religious revival from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. At the last “Tea Party” rally I attended, earlier this year at the Washington Monument, some in the crowd made at least an attempt to look fierce and minatory. I stood behind signs that read: “We left our guns at home—this time” and “We invoke the First Amendment today—the Second Amendment tomorrow.” But Beck's event was tepid by comparison: a call to sink to the knees rather than rise from them. It was clever of him not to overbill it as a “Million”-type march (though Rep. Michele Bachmann was tempted to claim that magic figure). The numbers were impressive enough on their own, but the overall effect was large, vague, moist, and undirected: the Waterworld of white self-pity. The Washington Post quoted Linda Adams, a Beck supporter from Colorado, who said, “We want our country to get back to its original roots,” adding that “her ancestors were on the Mayflower and fought in the American Revolution.” She was also upset that some schools no longer require students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Well, the U.S. population is simply not going to be replenished by Puritan pilgrims from England, and the original Pledge of Allegiance was fine with most people as a statement of national unity, until its “original intent” was compromised by a late insertion of the words “under God” in the McCarthyite 1950s. But one still sees what she means and can feel sympathy with the pulse of nostalgia. added by: TimALoftis

Wikileaks Lawyer Says Pentagon Given Access to Unpublished Secret Documents – Newsweek

A U.S. lawyer representing the whistleblowing web site Wikileaks says U.S. government officials have been given codes and passwords granting them online access to official U.S. government documents that Wikileaks so far has not published. Timothy Matusheski, a lawyer from Hattiesburg, Miss., who says he represents whistleblowers and has been in touch with both Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and at least one government official involved in investigations of Wikileaks, said Wikileaks had set up a “secure channel” through which authorized users could access the unpublished material. He said credentials for using this Web site had been forwarded to representatives of the U.S. government whom he did not identify. Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Matusheski said U.S. officials had even been given access to an online mechanism where they would be able to redact what they consider potentially sensitive information. Matusheski says he himself has only been given a portion of the codes needed to access the unpublished material. So, he says, the U.S. government now has wider and more complete access to the material than he did. added by: toyotabedzrock

CNN Lets Pro-Abortion PAC Spout Its Anti-Palin Talking Points

CNN’s Jessica Yellin, a one-time ” prominent feminist activist ,” helped forward the talking points of the pro-abortion lobby by devoting part of a segment on Tuesday’s Rick’s List to EMILY List’s new anti-Sarah Palin ad. Yellin aired their left-wing accusations against the Republican and her endorsed candidates without providing the other side and/or fact-checking them . Anchor Rick Sanchez introduced the issue by bringing up the Republican’s recent “mamma grizzly” ad: “It seemed like a very effective ad that Sarah Palin had put out . I mean, professionally speaking, it was very clean, very well put together – the whole ‘grizzly mom’ ad that everyone was talking about- and, apparently, there’s some blowback on this now. What is that?” Before playing the PAC’s video, which featured women dressed and made-up to look like bears, in mockery of Palin’s “mama grizzly” term, the CNN correspondent noted that EMILY’s List is a ” political action group that raises money for Democratic women pro-choice candidates , and they are now unveiling a new get-out-the-vote effort that’s hitting back on this idea that Sarah Palin speaks for women voters…EMILY’s List’s campaign is called ‘Sarah Doesn’t Speak For Me,’ and they’re taking the whole idea of ‘momma grizzly’ quite literally.” She then played a clip from the ad. During the clip, the unnamed women launched standard attacks from the left against the former Alaska governor and her endorsed candidates: ” Want to know what threatens me? My daughter not having the right to choose. The fact that if you were in charge of this country, my little cubs wouldn’t have health care….Unemployment benefits…something that you and your gang of candidates want to do away with .” Sanchez and Yellin shared a laugh over the ad, and the correspondent continued that EMILY’s List is “trying to drum up interest among Democratic voters who aren’t that energized right now, compared to Republicans, by taking on this whole idea, and with a little bit of humor.” Neither CNN personality provided any response from a pro-life organization or individual, something that CBSNews.com brought up in their Tuesday article about EMILY List’s campaign: Anti-abortion rights group the Susan B. Anthony List , which recently concluded a 23-city bus tour designed to spotlight its support for candidates who oppose abortion rights, quickly hit back with a statement suggesting “EMILY’s List is running scared.” “EMILY’s List is busy perpetuating what it purports to abhor: using women candidates with whom they disagree as punching bags,” said Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser. “On the eve of the 90th anniversary of women’s suffrage, the SBA List calls upon EMILY’s List to come to grips with reality.” Yellin also said nothing of whether Palin and her endorsed candidates actually are against health care for children and seek to “do away with unemployment benefits.” Obviously, the former governor and most, if not all, of her picked candidates are pro-life. It’s not surprising that Yellin would omit doing this, given her past as a leader of Harvard-Radcliffe Students For Choice , and, as The Harvard Crimson described her , a “prominent feminist activist in her own right .” During an April 10, 1992 interview with The Crimson , she actually lamented the apparent opposition to women’s studies at Harvard when she was an undergraduate there (Yellin was a political science and women’s studies double major): “For people interested in women’s issues or gender studies, this is an overtly hostile environment .” The transcript of the relevant portion of Jessica Yellin’s segment on Tuesday’s Rick’s List, beginning at the 19 minutes into the 3 pm Eastern hour mark: SANCHEZ: Let me ask you about the Sarah Palin situation going on, because- you know, we saw the ad, and I thought- and I had said on television- in fact, you and I were watching this- that it seemed like a very effective ad that Sarah Palin had put out. I mean, professionally speaking, it was very clean, very well put together- the whole ‘grizzly mom’ ad that everyone was talking about, and, apparently, there’s some blowback on this now. What is that? YELLIN: That’s right. Well, that Sarah Palin ‘momma grizzly’ ad has caught a lot of attention, and driven a lot of media interest, at least in Palin and this movement of women candidates she’s endorsing. But EMILY’s List is a political action group that raises money for Democratic women pro-choice candidates, and they are now unveiling a new get-out-the-vote effort that’s hitting back on this idea that Sarah Palin speaks for women voters who are- quote, ‘conservative momma grizzlies.’  EMILY’s List’s campaign is called ‘Sarah Doesn’t Speak For Me,’ and they’re taking the whole idea of ‘momma grizzly’ quite literally. Watch this. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE 1 (from EMILY’s List ad): When my cubs are threatened- (unidentified woman roars like an animal) UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE 2: But want to know what threatens me? My daughter not having the right to choose. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE 3: The fact that if you were in charge of this country, my little cubs wouldn’t have health care. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE 4: When the salmon stopped coming down the stream and I didn’t work for three months, guess how we survived? Unemployment benefits, which is something that you and your gang of candidates want to do away with. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE 5: You know, Ms. Palin, that really gets under my skin and my-   SANCHEZ (live): (Yellin laughs) Oh, my God. Did we have to stop it there because the bear was going to really get mad? (Sanchez laughs) YELLIN: It was going to climb out of the TV screen and get you. (Sanchez laughs) So, you see what they’re doing. It’s a get-out-the-vote campaign. That’s on their website. They also ask people to go in and sign a pledge that they’ll turn out to vote. Obviously, they’re trying to drum up interest among Democratic voters who aren’t that energized right now, compared to Republicans, by taking on this whole idea, and with a little bit of humor- SANCHEZ: Yeah. YELLIN: I think that’s humorous. SANCHEZ: Humor both ways- we will let the viewers decide. My thanks to you, Jessica.

Go here to read the rest:
CNN Lets Pro-Abortion PAC Spout Its Anti-Palin Talking Points

First Images of Kelly Brook’s Playboy Photoshoot Released

A closer glimpse to Kelly Brook’s Playboy photo shoot has been released. Brook, who will have her sultry images fronting the September issue of the men’s magazine, graces the cover with an umbrella, a bowler hat, a bow-tie, black lacy underwear and has her hands covering her boobs. In addition to the cover image, which is entitled “The U.K’s hottest export”, another revealed-picture shows Brook posing seductively and baring lots of her skin. Brook, however, admitted that she felt nervous about the photo shoot, telling the magazine: “I’m not 20 any more. My boobs are real, and they even hang a little.” Brook was said pocketing a half-a-million dollar to pose naked for the adult magazine. A source also revealed to The Sun, “It’s a real honor to be asked to do Playboy as obviously they are very picky about who they want. And by the same token it’s a real coup for Playboy as there probably isn’t a red-blooded male who won’t be looking forward to the pictures.” http://www.theblogismine.com/2010/08/09/first-images-of-kelly-brooks-playboy-pho… added by: theblogismine