Tag Archives: skin

The Navy Is Discharging Jarod McIntosh Because It Found Photos Of His Boyfriend on a Cell Phone / Queerty

Meet Jarod McIntosh. He's being discharged from the Navy because he accidentally brought his camera-equipped cell phone into a submarine, which is a restricted area. Yes, that was a dumb move. But even dumber is what happened afterward. His superiors confiscated his phone to ensure it didn't contain any classified material. It didn't. But there were what sounds like intimate photos of Jared and his boyfriend Doug. Jared is being discharged not for breaking the rules about bringing audio-video equipment into a restricted area, but for being gay. He's appealing the separation. added by: toyotabedzrock

Response – Homosexuality is an Abomintion

Well if it says it in books it much be true. In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, written by a US man, and posted on the Internet. Funny stuff. Dear Dr. Laura: Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination … End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them. 1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? 2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? 3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. 4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? 5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it? 6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination? 7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here? 8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die? 9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? 10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14) I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. Your adoring fan. James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian) added by: SageRockandRoll

Response – Holosexuality is an Abomintion

Well if it says it in books it much be true. In her radio show, Dr Laura Schlesinger said that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura, written by a US man, and posted on the Internet. Funny stuff. Dear Dr. Laura: Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination … End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them. 1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? 2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? 3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of Menstrual uncleanliness – Lev.15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. 4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? 5. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it? 6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination, Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Are there 'degrees' of abomination? 7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here? 8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die? 9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves? 10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14) I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I'm confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. Your adoring fan. James M. Kauffman, Ed.D. Professor Emeritus, Dept. Of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education University of Virginia PS (It would be a damn shame if we couldn't own a Canadian) added by: SageRockandRoll

On CNN, Tavis Smiley Sees Racism in Rangel, Waters Probes; Actress Trashes Limbaugh

PBS talk show host Tavis Smiley guest-hosted on CNN’s Larry King Live on Tuesday night, and perhaps unsurprisingly, encouraged the view that there’s racism in the congressional ethics investigations of Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters. “Facts are facts. The names that keep coming out happen to be members of the Congressional Black Caucus.” Smiley never seemed to consider whether the charges had merit — on the content of these politicians’ character — only on the color of their skin. He asked actress Aisha Tyler about this alleged outbreak of racism in the Democrat-dominated Congress, and Tyler unleashed an attack on Rush Limbaugh for suggesting the media thinks Michelle Obama’s entitled to a lavish vacation in Spain because of America’s sordid racial past: SMILEY: I wanted to raise this with Aisha. Maxine Waters on this radio show, on “The Tom Joyner Show” today — and I’m paraphrasing here — makes the point that this committee is established under Democrats, but the names that keep leaking out on the folks under investigation happen to be African- American members of Congress. Eight names of members of the Congressional Black Caucus, including, of course, Charlie Rangel, including Maxine Waters, have leaked out. What do you make of that? TYLER: Look, if I was a conspiracy theorist, or if I was a little bit more dead inside that I already am, if I had been deadened more by the political process over the last two years than I already have been, you would see a pattern of trying to besmirched the president’s name by association. I think what we have generally — I mean, when you look at something like the FLOTUS trip to Spain and everyone criticizing her for not taking American trips — she’s already taken four American vacations here. There’s this ongoing effort to call regular kind of common behavior into question and associate it somehow with race. Taking a lavish trip to Spain with 60 Secret Service agents isn’t “common behavior,” even if Mrs. Obama can’t travel without an entourage. Limbaugh’s brief commentary was addressed to the point that the liberal media have long defended the Obamas in everything they do, with the added psychoanalysis that the Obama deserve a different, more charitable standard of analysis because they are the historic first black family in the White House. What was seriously phony in this conversation was Tyler and Smiley expressing oh-so-great reluctance to see racism in every criticism of a black politician: TYLER: I hate to be in that want place. I don’t ever want to be in that place mentally. It’s not a fun place for me to be, to be always thinking about things being motivated racially. SMILEY: But — I think the R-word is over-used in this country. But facts are facts. The names that keep coming out happen to be members of the Congressional Black Caucus. STEPHANIE MILLER: As you know, it’s a complete mistake when Fox News is talking about Shirley Sherrod and runs footage of Maxine Waters by accident, and talking about John Conyers and runs footage of William Jefferson by mistake. You know that’s just a mistake. TYLER: You don’t even want to say what the subtext is in there. It’s such a clam. You know what I mean? You don’t even want to bring it up. I do think the word racism is over-used in this country. At the same time, what I do think is happening right now is there’s more of a subtext of racialism, where when you have somebody like Rush Limbaugh saying that the reason that Michelle Obama went to Spain is that black people are trying to get some of what white people have enjoyed. I mean, come on. Smiley was so enjoying Tyler’s attacks on Limbaugh that he returned to encouraging them after a commercial break: SMILEY: Welcome back to Larry King Live, joined now by our panel. Before the break, Aisha, you were starting to lay out for us your formulation at least about the Michelle Obama trip to Spain. I want to go around the horn, but go ahead and finish your point. TYLER: The thing that I’m really struggling with here — and I’m not going to call Rush Limbaugh, but that is a racialist attitude to say that somehow black people have never traveled abroad until the First Lady got her shot at Spain. I mean, look, I speak three languages. I lived in Europe. I lived overseas. The idea that somehow she’s getting back at white people for slavery by paying her own way to take her daughter to Spain is just extraordinary hyperbole of the highest order. And it’s ridiculous. Tyler was the one picking up the “extraordinary hyperbole” in alleging Limbaugh had said “black people have never traveled abroad” or that Michelle is “getting back at white people for slavery” with the Spain trip — neither of which he said.

Excerpt from:
On CNN, Tavis Smiley Sees Racism in Rangel, Waters Probes; Actress Trashes Limbaugh

‘Twelve’ Stars 50 Cent, Chace Crawford Choose Their Favorite Movie Drug Dealers

‘One of my favorite movies of all time is ‘True Romance,’ ‘ Crawford says about the Quentin Tarantino-penned flick. By Jocelyn Vena Chase Crawford Photo: MTV News In their new drama “Twelve,” out this weekend, Chace Crawford and 50 Cent both play New York City drug dealers, following in the footsteps of a long line of celluloid drug dealers. So the duo had plenty of inspiration to fuel their own work in the film. Al Pacino’s legendary role of Tony Montana in “Scarface” was cited by several of the “Twelve” castmembers as favorites, including Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson and Billy Magnussen. But Rory Culkin called out his co-stars for making such an obvious choice. “Movie drug dealer? Everyone’s gonna say ‘Scarface!’ ” he said. ” ‘The Wackness’s Josh Peck was a pretty badass little pot dealer. I dug it.” There was one other flick that came out on top. “One of my favorite movies of all time is ‘True Romance,’ ” Chace Crawford said. “Brad Pitt obviously plays a hilarious character in that. He’s funny. Gary Oldman is awesome. That’s probably, as far as that goes, my favorite.” Like Crawford, director Joel Schumacher also named the 1993 Tony Scott film, which was written by Quentin Tarantino. “My favorite drug dealer in a movie would be Gary Oldman in ‘True Romance.’ The lovely red-headed woman [Zo

‘Middle Men’: Sex Trades, By Kurt Loder

Luke Wilson and Giovanni Ribisi pioneer the Internet’s biggest business. Giovanni Ribisi in “Middle Men” Photo: Paramount Pictures Putting porn on the Internet was a no-brainer: Masturbating millions wanted the stuff and were eager to pay for their solitary pleasures. The problem was how to separate these lonely souls from their money digitally. According to “Middle Men,” a new movie “inspired by a true story,” this problem was solved by Wayne Beering (Giovanni Ribisi) and Buck Dolby (Gabriel Macht), two over-wound young L.A. hustlers who in 1997 created a computer program to enable online credit-card payments, and then, in a further refinement, hatched the idea of anonymous billing, so that instead of your wife or whoever coming across a credit-card charge from, say, “Milf Wagon Productions,” all she would see would be a payment to, say, “24/7 Billing Company.” This allowed Wayne and Buck to operate, not as actual pornographers, but as blameless middlemen between the skin trade’s suppliers and consumers. Brilliant. The story is approximately derived from the experiences of Christopher Mallick, one of the film’s producers. Back in the wild ’90s, Mallick was an executive with the online billing outfit Paycom, and if “Middle Men” is any indication of the adventures he truly endured, it’s something of a surprise that he’s still alive. Having set up their fledgling porn site and billing operation, Wayne and Buck (both fictitious characters) settle back to wait for customers. Their wait is brief — money comes gushing in immediately. Soon they’re making $25,000 a day, and before long, much, much more. Unfortunately, enveloped as they are in a haze of booze, cocaine and VHS porn tapes, they have no capacity for conducting business. After deciding to produce their own porn for uploading, and visiting a big strip club to recruit performers, they find themselves in the crosshairs of a Russian mobster named Nikita (Rade Serbedzija). He agrees to supply the girls, but he wants 25 percent of the profits. Wayne and Buck realize they’re in over their heads. Fortunately, a skeezy lawyer named Haggerty (James Caan) connects them with a real businessman, a mild-mannered fixer named Jack Harris (Luke Wilson), who specializes in bailing out troubled companies. Jack is a straight arrow with a wife and kids and a beautiful home in Houston. But he immediately sees the lucrative possibilities in setting up Wayne and Buck — and himself — as porn-world middlemen. It’s just another business, he figures, and he’s confident he won’t get sucked down into the slime. He’s wrong, of course — it wouldn’t be much of a movie if he weren’t. But there’s also an interesting twist. Following an accidental death that puts the Russian mobsters in an even surlier mood than usual (“I kill you, your family, people you haven’t met yet,” says Nikita), Jack is approached by Curt Allmans (Kevin Pollak), an agent with the FBI’s Organized Crime Task Force. Surprisingly, Allmans has no interest in rocking Jack’s porn boat; in fact, he wants him to keep chugging along. Because it turns out that among the millions of porn hounds logging onto Wayne and Buck’s proliferating sites are Arab terrorists (“They’re men,” Allmans says, by way of unnecessary explanation), and as soon as they make that fatal mouse-click, the U.S. military can target and terminate them. This is very funny, as is much of the rest of the movie. The director, George Gallo, embraces the gamey porn scene with gusto: There’s oodles of nudity, of course (and lots of over-inflated breastage), and Gallo draws savory performances from Ribisi (who’s a wired wonder in several scenes) and Laura Ramsey, who plays a young porn star with no regrets (yet, anyway). And casting Caan as the lowlife lawyer was a good call — his Haggerty suggests the urgent need for a bath even if you’ve just recently had one. It’s too bad that Wilson, who’s not an especially expressive actor, can’t really hold the movie together. He anchors it with his earnest solidity, but he doesn’t deliver the frazzled intensity that Jack’s descent into the porn maelstrom would seem to call for. You might expect the character to be more buzzed by his exotic new surroundings; Wilson just seems morose. It’s a lively movie, though, with just the right acrid tang. In the end, Jack finds himself facing a very bad federal rap that can’t be dodged, however helpful he’s been to the FBI. He thought that being a middleman in the porn trade would isolate him from the sleaze, lift him above it. Instead, it just left him stuck in the middle. (“Middle Men” is a Paramount Pictures release. Paramount and MTV are both subsidiaries of Viacom.) Don’t miss Kurt Loder’s review of “The Other Guys,” also new in theaters this week. Check out everything we’ve got on “Middle Men.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Photos ‘Middle Men’

Read more:
‘Middle Men’: Sex Trades, By Kurt Loder

Scientists Discover Star 300 Times More Massive Than The Sun

Astronomers have identified the most massive stars known. These objects are millions of times brighter than our Sun and the largest of them all is a whoppin' 300 times the mass of our favorite star. The stars were discovered in two clusters—NGC 3603 and RMC 136a—and researchers used a “combination of instruments on the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, in addition to archival data from the Hubble Space Telescope, to study the stellar nurseries.” With this combination of tools, they were able to discover some almost scary details about R136a1, the most massive of the stars: Its current mass is approximately 265 solar masses, and its estimated birth weight was as much as 320 times that of our sun. R136a1 also has the highest luminosity of any star found to date – nearly 10 million times greater than the sun. I can almost feel my skin turning red just reading that. http://gizmodo.com/5592604/this-star-is-so-fat-that-its-300-times-the-mass-of-th… added by: pjacobs51

WaPo Obit Tones Down Climate Scientist’s Recent Attack on ‘Hitlerian Lies’ and ‘Gun-Toting Rightwingers’

The Washington Post obituary for liberal climate scientist Stephen Schneider, a media favorite over the years to promote the allegedly ironclad certainty of global warming, replayed a very recent jeremiad against “Hitlerian lies” by conservatives in the wake of Climategate. But the Post’s version of his remarks toned him down and excised his attacks on “gun-toting rightwingers” who are Limbaugh and Beck fans. T. Rees Shapiro reported: His passionate views on the climate debate occasionally attracted vitriol from extremist groups. An FBI investigation recently found he was named on a neo-Nazi “death list,” and Dr. Schneider said he received hundreds of hate e-mails a day. “What do I do? Learn to shoot a magnum? Wear a bulletproof jacket?” Dr. Schneider said. “I have now had extra alarms fitted at my home, and my address is unlisted. I get scared that we’re now in a new Weimar Republic where people are prepared to listen to what amounts to Hitlerian lies about climate scientists.” Nonetheless, Dr. Schneider said he believed it was important for scientists to communicate with the public and spread their understanding of climate data and findings. “If we do not do the due diligence of letting people understand the relative credibility of claimants of truth, then all we do is have a confused public who hears claim and counterclaim,” Dr. Schneider said in a recent interview with Climate Science Watch. “When somebody says ‘I don’t believe in global warming,’ I ask, ‘Do you believe in evidence? Do you believe in a preponderance of evidence?’ ” For a fuller version of Schneider’s remarks, we turn to the leftist British newspaper The Guardian  on July 5, in which correspondent Leo Hickman warned “Climate scientists in the US say police inaction has left them defenceless in the face of a torrent of death threats and hate mail.” Schneider sounds less like a scientist and more like an activist:   Schneider described his attackers as “cowards” and said he had observed an “immediate, noticeable rise” in emails whenever climate scientists were attacked by prominent right-wing US commentators, such as Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh . “[The senders] are not courageous people,” said Schneider. “Where are they getting their information from? They just listen to assertions made on blogs and rightwing talkshows. It’s pathetic .” Schneider said the FBI had taken an interest earlier this year when his name appeared on a “death list” on a neo-Nazi website alongside other climate scientists with apparent Jewish ancestry. But, to date, no action has been taken. “The effect on me has been tremendous,” said Schneider. ” Some of these people are mentally imbalanced. They are invariably gun-toting rightwingers. What do I do? Learn to shoot a Magnum? Wear a bullet-proof jacket? I have now had extra alarms fitted at my home and my address is unlisted. I get scared that we’re now in a new Weimar republic where people are prepared to listen to what amounts to Hitlerian lies about climate scientists.” The Post obituary made no reference whatsoever to Schneider’s arguments in the 1970s that the real peril was global cooling . That apparently would have been too much of a concession to the gun-toting rightwingers.

Here is the original post:
WaPo Obit Tones Down Climate Scientist’s Recent Attack on ‘Hitlerian Lies’ and ‘Gun-Toting Rightwingers’

Morning Joe Libs Sweep Sherrod, Voter Intimidation Under Carpet: Let’s Not ‘Scratch A Sore’

It’s pretty hard—even for media liberals—to defend a guy in paramilitary duds swinging a billy club outside a polling site, or a government official bragging about having declined to do everything in her power to help someone because of the white color of his skin.  So on today’s Morning Joe, Margaret Carlson, Norah O’Donnell and Mike Barnicle were obliged to engage in a modicum of hand-wringing over the incidents.  But once having discharged that duty, the trio set about doing what libs do best: finding ways to minimize the matters and excuse the MSM’s failure to cover them. To be sure, Carlson did call the statement by the USDA official “hateful” and said one should be “ashamed.” And Norah O’Donnell and Mike Barnicle agreed with Joe Scarborough that the MSM can fairly be criticized for undercovering these stories. But then the three started their excuse-a-thon: Carlson: “I mean, there’s more [racism] on one side [whites] then the other,” though that didn’t change the fact that what Sherrod did was wrong. O’Donnell: On this [Sherrod] particular case, while this egregious in my mind, it is an isolated, we believe, incident.  There’s no suggestion that the USDA is doing this as a systematic problem.  So I worry that in a climate that there have now been, that there is an effort to pile up a lot of these racially-charged stories , that concern me about things, that we’re, you know, setting up these black versus white stories in this country, that these instances are, because, are trying to create some kind of narrative about where we are in this country.  And that makes me nervous.  Do you know what I’m trying to say?  Do you know what I’m trying to say?   Barnicle: Out there, in this big large universe beyond television, that people are more obsessed with other issues like their jobs and their incomes than they are with what someone said in March working for the Department of Agriculture. After agreeing that if the polling site intimidators would, if white, have been immediately arrested and that there would have been more media coverage, Barnicle continued . . . BARNICLE: At this point, the incessant coverage of it, with all of the questions, it’s like scratching a sore.  That’s all it’s doing. It’s pulling a scab. As Joe Scarborough observed: “But who’s covered it? Fox has covered it, but even the Washington Post said nobody else has covered it.” After Scarborough accused the MSM of ignoring the stories, Carlson had the last word. CARLSON: Maybe not ignored.  I mean, there’s so many stories that slip by and go through the cracks , you don’t know . . . They did prosecute the guy who was holding the billy club at an almost all-black precinct.  So, intimidating white voters at an all-black precinct?  would you go to another precinct where there might be more [abruptly ends at hard commercial break]. Let’s summarize the libs’ arguments:  The media shouldn’t make too much of all this. The Sherrod thing was an isolated case. Covering these stories is just going to stir up bad feelings.  And anyhow, the stories aren’t that important, compared to the economy.  And, hey, lots of stories slip through the media cracks: these just happened to be two of them. And you know, the voter intimidation was really pretty harmless.   All of which goes to prove a point that Scarborough made: with media liberals who think like this, were the racial tables turned, these stories would have been the subject of 28-part front page series.

See original here:
Morning Joe Libs Sweep Sherrod, Voter Intimidation Under Carpet: Let’s Not ‘Scratch A Sore’

Toxicologists: Corexit ruptures red blood cells, is much more toxic than most realize

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/07/toxicologists-corexit-ruptures-red.html Toxicologists: Corexit “Ruptures Red Blood Cells, Causes Internal Bleeding”, “Allows Crude Oil To Penetrate “Into The Cells” and “Every Organ System” As I have previously noted, Corexit is toxic, is less effective than other dispersants, and is actually worsening the damage caused by the oil spill. Now, two toxicologists are saying that Corexit is much more harmful to human health and marine life than we've been told. Specifically Gulf toxicologist Dr. Susan Shaw – Founder and Director of the Marine Environmental Research Institute – dove into the oil spill to examine the chemicals present. Dr. Shaw told CNN: If I can tell you what happens — because I was in the oil — to people… Shrimpers throwing their nets into water… [then] water from the nets splashed on his skin. … [He experienced a] headache that lasted 3 weeks… heart palpitations… muscle spasms… bleeding from the rectum… And that’s what that Corexit does, it ruptures red blood cells, causes internal bleeding, and liver and kidney damage. … This stuff is so toxic combined… not the oil or dispersants alone. … Very, very toxic and goes right through skin. *** The reason this is so toxic is because of these solvents [from dispersant] that penetrate the skin of anything that’s going through the dispersed oil takes the oil into the cells — takes the oil into the organs… and this stuff is toxic to every organ system in the body. … (more at link and an additional video on corexit) See also: Leaked Corexit info http://beforeitsnews.com/story/98/069/San_Francisco_Chronicle:_Leaked_Corexit_In… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1mI-DJII1U&feature=player_embedded added by: samantha420