Tag Archives: skin

Lindsay Lohan Tampered With Ankle Monitor Twice

On two occasions, Lindsay Lohan tried to tamper with the SCRAM alcohol monitoring device on her ankle to obstruct its readings, according to new reports. Lohan’s ankle monitor went off after the MTV Movie Awards June 7. This was not a factor in her recent probation violation case, but doesn’t help her cause. The troubled little brat earned a 90-day jail term for disregarding the terms of her probation, stemming from her wild 2007 high-speed chase and DUI arrest. The SCRAM device was a condition of her bail prior to this week’s hearing, not her probation, so the alleged tampering was barred from court proceedings. Not that its omission did her much good. Sources connected with Lindsay Lohan’s case say the actress twice placed a foreign object between her skin and the SCRAM to block its alcohol readings. The night of the MTV Movie Awards, when the ankle monitor went off and showed a .03 blood alcohol level, was one of the times Lindsay tampered with it. Sources say days later Lindsay tried obstructing her SCRAM again, and the data registered by the SCRAM device reveals tampering on both occasions. Her lawyer, Shawn Chapman Holley, counters “There are a number of people who were with her who could attest that she never tampered with her bracelet and there are well-documented problems with the SCRAM bracelet and its accuracy.” LOL. Who are these people exactly Shawn? Moreover, why would we believe anyone close to Lindsay freaking Lohan, the type of girl who says f–k you to the judge in tiny print on her fingernails? Lindsay claims, of course, that the profane manicure was just a joke and had nothing to do with the court proceedings. Geez, get off her back already! Hours after the sentence, Lindsay bitterly complained to friends, calling Judge Marsha Revel “a f**king b!tch” who hates her and was out to get her. Lindsay insists she does not have a problem with drugs or alcohol and thinks Revel slapped her with the 90-day sentence to make an example out of her. Works for us if so. Lindsay belongs in …

Originally posted here:
Lindsay Lohan Tampered With Ankle Monitor Twice

Lindsay Obstructed SCRAM Twice — Allegedly

Filed under: Lindsay Lohan , Celebrity Justice Sources connected with Lindsay Lohan ‘s case tell TMZ LiLo twice placed a foreign object between her skin and her SCRAM, to obstruct any alcohol reading. We’re told the night of the MTV Movie Awards — when her SCRAM registered more than a .03 blood… Read more

Read the original here:
Lindsay Obstructed SCRAM Twice — Allegedly

X-ray pinups: Boners for bones

Created by a German ad firm to show off some high-def Japanese monitors for doctors, the photos that follow feature women in a total state of undress: You can see right through their clothes…and their skin. Man, doctors are kinky. http://io9.com/5564263/x ray-pinups-boners-for-bones/gallery/ added by: pjacobs51

Coldplay Back In ‘Exploratory’ Mood During Rebooted Album Sessions

Mysterious band blogger promises ‘killer’ tunes on Viva la Vida follow-up. By Gil Kaufman Coldplay’s Jonny Buckland and Chris Martin Photo: Getty Images It’s one of the eternal challenges of the musician: to describe the sound you hear in your head and translate it into a song that will stir emotion in your fans. Even harder, though, is describing those songs before they are even halfway finished and trying to make sense of what they may turn into. In the case of Coldplay , that job currently falls to the mysterious “Roadie #42,” who has been posting infrequent updates on the band’s website , the latest of which promises that the tunes for their follow up to the world smash Viva la Vida will be full of, well, “killer” songs. Roadie, who revealed that his/her role has recently expanded to engineering the album, said a few of the lyrics from the band’s debut hit “Yellow” — “your skin and bones turn into something beautiful” — aptly describe the current process. “With the project getting something of a reboot after Latin America, they’ve been very much back in the exploratory phase again,” #42 wrote. “As described in the previous blog, there is a list of songs now and those songs have verses, choruses, riffs, lyrics and so on. These are the raw materials, though. Unrefined and rough, this is the record’s skin and bones, if you will. The ‘turning into something beautiful’ bit is the result of two methodologies.” Working again with Brian Eno , Coldplay have been tracking the album at their new studio in London and in Budapest, and after a recent tour of South America, #42 said they were recently back at work in earnest. Eno has tried to shake things up by forcing singer Chris Martin to work separately from his bandmates and then pairing the band’s members up at random to push the envelope. When last we checked in, the Roadie said rough mixes for a number of songs and a “possible running order” had already been written up. The first methodology is what Eno calls the “screwdriver work,” the craftsmanship and songwriting phase where everything is “tried and changed, analysed and re-appraised” in search of that special Coldplay magic. The second are the “happy accidents” that happen when someone is just noodling around or putting words from a different song onto a new arrangement. “Both things get the record made and neither can be invoked by attempting the other,” #42 wrote. “Sitting around waiting for inspiration doesn’t get the hard work done and long conversations and methodical approaches can waste hours when a single snap of brilliance can change everything in an instant.” While Eno has been popping in to check on progress, he’s also been leaving the band alone to get things done. “It’s been noted that he’s having as much effect on the record when he isn’t here as when he is. The band observed a little while ago that very often when they were working without him and getting stuck, they’d think of something that he would say and apply it, getting them ‘over the hump.’ ” In order to help, the band asked Eno to come up with a kind of Ten Commandments they could hang on the studio wall that would help them get out of musical dilemmas. The rules appear to be working, as Roadie described: “I’ve seen Chris on more than one occasion get halfway through playing something a little too flowery or ‘done before,’ before breaking down in laughter and shaking his head, saying, ‘All I can hear in the back of my head is Brian telling me off.’ ” The band is on break again for a few weeks, spending time with family, but not before a recent spurt of hard work that consisted of ” a real concerted effort to push every song to a place that everyone was excited about … Anything that’s not as great as the current favourite song gets strong focus. Problems get the spotlight so that they can’t hide. A verse that’s not flowing into the bridge gracefully can get a whole day’s attention — the screwdrivers have well and truly been out.” After weeks of tweaking the little details and only paying attention to the bits that don’t work, Roadie said the band is now taking a longer step back and “trying to objectively experience what they have made so far. I could be mistaken, but it genuinely felt as though there was real excitement spreading through the room. Perhaps it began to dawn on the fellas that what they have here is more than just a collection of intros, verses and choruses. “The songs haven’t assumed their final beautiful form yet, but they’re a very long way from their skin and bones phase. What’s impossible not to conclude, though, is that they have some absolutely killer tunes. I have no idea whether the fellas left for their break proud of what they’ve achieved so far and excited about what they have here, but I really hope so. They should be.” Though a spokesperson for the band could not be reached for comment at press time, Coldplay have said they’re aiming to have the new, yet-untitled album in stores by Christmas. What are you expecting from Coldplay’s new album? Let us know in the comments! Related Artists Coldplay

Read more from the original source:
Coldplay Back In ‘Exploratory’ Mood During Rebooted Album Sessions

Stewart On Latest BP Developments: "We Are So F–ked" (VIDEO)

Funny, but sad! added by: kennymotown

Secret ingredients of Corexit now revealed by feds after their dumping on the Gulf

After weeks of silence on the issue, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finally decided to go public with the list of ingredients used to manufacture Corexit, the chemical dispersant used by BP in the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster. There are two things about this announcement that deserve our attention: First, the ingredients that have been disclosed are extremely toxic, and second, why did the EPA protect the oil industry's “trade secrets” for so long by refusing to disclose these ingredients until now? As reported in the New York Times, Brian Turnbaugh, a policy analyst at OMB Watch said, “EPA had the authority to act all along; its decision to now disclose the ingredients demonstrates this. Yet it took a public outcry and weeks of complaints for the agency to act and place the public's interest ahead of corporate interests.” On the toxicity question, you could hardly find a more dangerous combination of poisons to dump into the Gulf of Mexico than what has been revealed in Corexit. The Corexit 9527 product has been designated a “chronic and acute health hazard” by the EPA. It is made with 2-butoxyethanol, a highly toxic chemical that has long been linked to the health problems of cleanup crews who worked on the Exxon Valdez spill. A newer Corexit recipe dubbed the “9500 formula” contains dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, a detergent chemical that's also found in laxatives. What do you suppose happens to the marine ecosystem when fish and sea turtles ingest this chemical through their gills and skin? And just as importantly, what do you think happens to the human beings who are working around this chemical, breathing in its fumes and touching it with their skin? The answers are currently unknown, which is exactly why it is so inexcusable that Nalco and the oil industry giants would for so long refuse to disclose the chemical ingredients they're dumping into the Gulf of Mexico in huge quantities (over a million gallons dumped into the ocean to date). But it gets even more interesting when you look at just how widespread this “chemical secrecy” is across Big Business in the USA… and how the U.S. government more often than not conspires with industry to keep these chemicals a secret. It's time to end chemical trade secrets Armed with the accomplices in the FDA, EPA, FTC and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, powerful corporations have been keeping secrets from us all. It's not just the toxic chemicals in Corexit, either: Large manufacturers of consumers products — such as Unilever, Proctor & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson — routinely use toxic chemical ingredients in their products — ingredients which are usually kept secret from the public. Similarly, virtually every perfume, cologne and fragrance product on the market is made with cancer-causing chemicals that their manufacturers refuse to disclose, claiming their formulas are “trade secrets.” Throughout Big Business in America, the toxic chemicals used in everyday products such as household cleaners, cosmetics and yard care remain a dangerous secret, and the U.S. government actually colludes with industry to keep these chemical ingredients a secret by, for example, refusing to require full disclosure of ingredients for personal care products. The FDA offers us virtually no enforcement in this area, depending almost entirely on companies to declare their own chemicals are safe rather than requiring actual safety testing to be conducted. This is why the following statement is frightening yet true: What BP is doing to the Gulf of Mexico, companies like Proctor & Gamble are doing to the entire population. We are all being mass poisoned by the toxic chemicals in personal care products, foods, medicines, fragrance products and other concoctions created by powerful corporations that use toxic chemicals throughout their product lines… but who refuse to disclose those ingredients in the public. continued added by: JanforGore

Former NYT Editorialist Cohen Insists First Amendment Free Speech Protection Is ‘Vague’

In his June 9 “case study” feature for Time.com, Adam Cohen, formerly of the New York Times editorial board and Time magazine, tackled the question “Are Liberal Judges Really ‘Judicial Activists’?” Cohen’s short answer: yes, but so are conservative judges, and it’s the conservatives on the Supreme Court that have been on an activist kick lately. To bolster his argument, Cohen complained that judges must of necessity make judgment calls about vague elements of U.S. law and the Constitution. You know, vague stuff like, wait for it, the First Amendment (emphases mine): Roberts and the rest of the court’s five-member conservative majority have overturned congressional laws and second-guessed local elected officials as aggressively as any liberal judges. And they have been just as quick to rely on vague constitutional clauses. Earlier this year, in the Citizens United campaign-finance case, the court’s conservatives struck down a federal law that prohibited corporations from spending on federal elections. Once again, they relied on a vaguely worded constitutional guarantee. That “vaguely worded constitutional guarantee” reads as follows: Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. What part of that is vague? Congress has no business abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. The amendment says nothing about whose freedom of speech, and congressional attempts to fence in that freedom of speech to individuals alone, and not corporate entities, is a pretty clear violation of the text of the amendment’s prohibition against speech abridgement. Indeed, as the majority in Citizen’s United made clear: Speech restrictions based on the identity of the speaker are all too often simply a means to control content….The First Amendment protects speech and speaker, and the ideas that flow from each. Cohen also considers “vague” the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause: In a 2007 case, the conservative majority overturned voluntary racial integration programs in Seattle and Louisville, Ky. Good idea or bad, the programs were adopted by local officials who had to answer to voters. But the conservative Justices had no problem invoking the vague words of the Equal Protection Clause to strike them down. In that controversy, the two school systems involved were purposefully engineering the racial demography of schools within their districts to correct what was perceived as racial imbalance. In other words, some schools were too white, others too black, in the eyes of policymakers. Whereas Brown v. Board ruled that de jure segregation was a violation of the 14th Amendment protections because segregation by law was inherently unequal, liberal proponents of the Seattle and Louisville plans defended the respective school districts’ obsession with the skin color of its school populations.  Here’s how Washington Post reporter Robert Barnes recorded the logic of Chief Justice Roberts in the Court’s opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 et al. : “Before Brown, schoolchildren were told where they could and could not go to school based on the color of their skin,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for a plurality that included Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. “The school districts in these cases have not carried the heavy burden of demonstrating that we should allow this once again — even for very different reasons.” He added: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”  Those crazy conservative justices and their radical activism, upholding the implications of Brown v. Board of Education!

Go here to see the original:
Former NYT Editorialist Cohen Insists First Amendment Free Speech Protection Is ‘Vague’

New ‘Eclipse’ Photos Emerge

Bella, Edward, Jacob and other beloved ‘Twilight’ characters populate 20 new production stills. By Josh Wigler Jacob (Taylor Lautner) and Bella (Kristen Stewart) in “Eclipse” Photo: Summit Entertainment There’s less than a month to go before the release of “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse,” but even three weeks of waiting seems like an eternity before the big-screen return of Bella (Kristen Stewart), Edward (Robert Pattinson) and Jacob (Taylor Lautner). With any luck, your appetites were somewhat satiated by the exclusive clip that debuted at the 2010 MTV Movie Awards , but if you’re still craving an immediate trip to the world of “Twilight,” this new batch of official “Eclipse” production stills should do the trick. Twenty new photos were released on the official “Twilight” Facebook page this evening, offering fans with detailed glimpses at fan-favorite characters and exotic locations. The stills cover a wide gamut of scenes, including Bella’s mortal high school pals Jessica (Anna Kendrick), Eric (Justin Chon), Angela (Christian Serratos) and Mike (Michael Welch) gathered near a school bus, as well as the supernatural Cullen family banded together in the picturesque woods of Forks, Washington. Although Team Jacob supporters hoping for shirtless pictures of Taylor Lautner will be in for a disappointment, the actor’s werewolf brethren more than compensate in the skin department with four flashy photos. Also pictured is Riley (Xavier Samuel), one of Victoria’s (Bryce Dallas Howard) many vampire minions and an eventual nemesis of Edward Cullen’s. In addition to the sexy and action-packed pictures, a significant portion of the photos are devoted to quieter moments featuring Stewart as Bella. She appears alone with characters such as Edward, Jacob and even her father, Charlie (Billy Burke), not to mention a well-shot behind-the-scenes photograph alongside “Eclipse” director David Slade who is not replacing Robert Pattinson as Edward, despite an amusing quip from one sarcastic commenter. Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Photos ‘The Twilight Saga: Eclipse’

Read more from the original source:
New ‘Eclipse’ Photos Emerge

The Real Housewives of New York City Recap: A Boring Farewell

For a season finale, last night’s installment of The Real Housewives of New York City didn’t exactly leave us with any major cliffhangers. As our Real Housewives correspondent explains below, even the hilarity of LuAnn singing wasn’t enough to save one of the more boring episodes of the year. What did you think of it? This season of The Real Housewives of New York City ended with a… thud.

Donald Glover’s ‘Spider-Man’ Campaign: What Do You Think?

We headed to Times Square to see what moviegoers have to say about the ‘Community’ actor playing Peter Parker. By Rick Marshall Donald Glover Photo: Jason LaVeris/ FilmMagic Earlier this week, a fan campaign to cast “Community” actor Donald Glover as the star of the upcoming “Spider-Man” movie had the online world buzzing, with creators and fans alike weighing in on the idea of casting an African-American actor as the new Peter Parker. Earlier Wednesday (June 2), MTV News spoke to comic book historian Alan Kistler to get his take on the heated debate raging around the Twitterverse — a discussion that became one of the hottest topics on Twitter this weekend and resulted in a Facebook fan group more than 8,000 members strong at last count. “There is nothing in the comic or the origin of the character that has to do with what ethnicity [Peter Parker] is, the color of his skin or his background,” Kistler told MTV’s Splash Page. While the noted historian of all things superhero went on to offer further analysis of why an African-American actor playing the famous Marvel Comics character isn’t so unbelievable, we went to the streets to get your take on the possibility of Glover playing Spider-Man. In Times Square, opinions varied on whether the actor was a good fit for the role. Some hoped he’d find a way into the running for the role, which was recently rumored to be down to five actors — all white. Reactions to the “Community” actor’s campaign for the role ranged from “really cool,” to one fan anticipating mixed feelings about giving Peter Parker a new look in the movie world. “Some people might get mad because they’re changing the character, and then some people might not because it’s different, something new,” Joey Warren said. However, not everyone was buying the idea of giving Spider-Man a race-bending makeover. “I’m not sure if that’s a good look,” Christian Crawford told MTV News. “I don’t think that’s going to be a good look.” What do you think about casting Donald Glover or another black actor as Peter Parker? Let us know in the comments! For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com . Related Photos Men Who Could Play Spider-Man

Continue reading here:
Donald Glover’s ‘Spider-Man’ Campaign: What Do You Think?