Tag Archives: The Pacific

Oil Spill and the SE Florida Reef System; What’s at stake?

On April 25, 2010, just five days after the BP Deep Horizon oil rig exploded, Reef Check, The Perry Institute for Marine Science and Ocean Rehab Initiative Inc. responded to protect threatened critical wetland ecosystems. Collaboratively, these institutions of marine research and conservation developed the Pre-Oil Volunteer Survey, whose methodology is now widely used across the Gulf of Mexico and Greater Caribbean by groups including USGS, USCG, NOAA, EPA, DEP, The Audubon Society, The Nature Conservancy, Surfrider Foundation and others. Scientists agreed that the survey methodology must be easy to teach and understand, be at little or no cost to perform, and provide real and significant results for science. In fact, you may even own most of the equipment needed for the survey, like a camera, GPS, tape measure, magic marker and plastic cards. To date, hundreds of volunteers have surveyed critical habitats for oil-threatened species in their native wetlands (estuaries, sea grasses, mangroves, lagoons, rivers, inlets, reefs and beaches) along South Florida, from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to Indian River County. Just this week, teams surveyed reefs in Palm Beach and Martin County, and were pleased to discover a healthy reef system. Residents up and down the coast have volunteered their time to aid during the largest environmental catastrophe in U.S. history. Current and future volunteers are not only divers, but come from all backgrounds: children, elderly, activists, government employees, retired and working citizens. To support conservation efforts and learn more about the methodology and volunteer opportunities in Florida, contact William via email at www.oceanrehab.org or call 561-308-8848. added by: OceanRehabWilliam

A Very Scary Light Show: Exploding H-Bombs In Space

Since we're coming up on the Fourth of July, and towns everywhere are preparing their better-than-ever fireworks spectaculars, we would like to offer this humbling bit of history. Back in the summer of 1962, the U.S. blew up a hydrogen bomb in outer space, some 250 miles above the Pacific Ocean. It was a weapons test, but one that created a man-made light show that has never been equaled — and hopefully never will. Here it is: Video and much more at the link! http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128170775 added by: treewolf39

100 foot long Narco Sub seized in S. America

The U.S. government announced on Saturday afternoon that for the first time ever a fully operational submarine used by drug traffickers has been seized in the waters of South America. The craft, which could move multi-ton loads of cocaine, was seized in a jungle tributary of Ecuador leading to the Pacific Ocean by Ecuadoran authorities using Drug Enforcement Administration intelligence. The sub is diesel-powered, has a periscope and air conditioning and measures 100 feet long and 9 feet tall. At least one person was arrested and an investigation continues, according to a news release from DEA. Although traffickers have used so-called “narco subs,” low-slung boats that are fully covered and ride low in the water, this is the first full-on submarine ever found in their hands. added by: Stoneyroad

"Recycled Island" Turns Ocean Plastic into a Paradise

Image via Recycled Island Ever dreamed of living on a giant island of plastic? Well, with all the plastic that floats around in the ocean as a toxic soup threatening all manner of marine life, one architecture firm has a bold vision to create an eco-paradise called “Recycled Island” in the Pacific Ocean with sustainability at its core. It’s a bold plan, but not only would the project help clean the oceans, the firm claims, it might just be a perfect home for

Visit link:
"Recycled Island" Turns Ocean Plastic into a Paradise

Partial Lunar Eclipse Today!

Photo via Wikimedia A partial eclipse of the moon will be visible before dawn on Saturday, June 26th. It will be visible to those living in the western half of the United States, Canada or South America. The best view in the U.S. will be the Pacific States. This type of eclipse takes place when a full moon is partly blocked by the Earth’s shadow. The eclipse starts at 10:17 Universal Time (5:17 a.m. Central Time, 4:17 a.m. Mountain Time or 3:17 a.m. Pacific Time). It will last for over 2.5 hours. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Here is the original post:
Partial Lunar Eclipse Today!

2010 US Open Golf Scores: Live Blog of Thursday’s Opening Round at Pebble Beach

8:44am CDT: Who’s the first one to shank it into the Pacific Ocean? 8:26am CDT: Since we’re about a half hour from the official start of the 110th US Open, here’s the first group to go off this morning at 7am local time. Steve Allen, Rafael Cabrera-Bello, John Mallinger, Deane Pappas, Paul Sheehan, and Gary Woodland. 8:20am CDT: One name I keep seeing on the field list at different tournaments …

Here is the original post:
2010 US Open Golf Scores: Live Blog of Thursday’s Opening Round at Pebble Beach

Robert Pattinson Says Bella And Jacob’s Relationship Is ‘Easier’

‘Edward’s got to remember, or learn, how to be a normal 17-year-old,’ ‘Eclipse’ star says of love triangle. By Eric Ditzian, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Robert Pattinson Photo: MTV News If you pay attention to the tabloids, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are either about to get engaged, or one “Twilight” co-star has gone ahead and dumped the other. It’s all too silly to pay attention to, and it proves how complicated it is for RPattz and KStew to have a relationship of any kind while so fully in the public eye. And the relationship of their fictional alter egos, Edward Cullen and Bella Swan , isn’t any easier. He was transformed into a deadly vampire in 1918; she’s a normal, accident-prone high school girl growing up in the Pacific Northwest. You can see why Pattinson might think Jacob Black is in many ways a better fit for Bella than Edward is. No matter that Black is a shape-shifting werewolf. “Their relationship is so much easier, Bella and Jacob, because he’s just a normal kid,” Pattinson told MTV News. “Edward’s got to remember, or learn, how to be a normal 17-year-old, because he’s never bothered.” As Pattinson describes it, Edward spent the first two movies in the vampire franchise remaining largely aloof, even going so far as to leave Bella in “New Moon,” deciding that she’d be better off without him. All that changes in “Eclipse,” and Edward has to play some serious cultural catch-up. It’s anything but easy. “[T]he whole thing is him having to accept the consequences of [being with Bella], which means catching up to the same pace of every other 17-year-old in the contemporary world, emotionally and intellectually and everything, and realizing he’s quite a long way behind,” Pattinson said. Does RPattz have a point about Edward and Bella, or is he just being humble? Share your analyses in the comments. We’ll be

World Cup 2010: Algeria aiming to vent their frustrations on England

A disappointing opening loss to Slovenia has Algeria desperate to make amends and Fabio Capello’s team are in the firing line Twenty-four years is an awfully long time to wait for a damp squib. For more than two decades the football-crazy people of Algeria craved another qualification for the World Cup and, once the passage to South Africa was booked, a fever of anticipation spread across virtually the whole country. All of which made for a monumental anticlimax when the Desert Foxes marked their grand return to the global stage last Sunday by slumping to a sorry 1-0 defeat to Slovenia. Against England tomorrow the Algerian team mean to make amends. “It was very disappointing, we were full of regrets after the game,” the Algeria midfielder Karim Matmour says, explaining that what made the defeat by Slovenia all the more agonising was the realisation that the Europeans were eminently beatable. “It was clear that we had a great chance to get off to a good start and we missed the opportunity. But we’ve lifted our heads up and we’ll be 200% determined to atone for that against the English.” • Follow the Guardian’s World Cup team on Twitter • Sign up to play our great Fantasy Football game • Stats centre: Get the lowdown on every player • The latest team-by-team news, features and more In the unlikely event of such talk tormenting Fabio Capello, England’s manager could soothe himself by rewatching Slovenia’s win – or, indeed, any of Algeria’s recent matches – because recently Rabah Saâdane’s team have seemed impotent. In the run-up to the World Cup they scored once in five games – a penalty against the United Arab Emirates – and there was no trace of their attack having grown teeth against Slovenia, when in the whole match they mustered a mere two shots on target. They looked negative but Matmour said it was not a lack of will that constrained them but the lack of an effective way. “We need to refine the way we move forward,” says the 24-year-old, who earns his living at Borussia Mönchengladbach. “The linkages between midfield and attack were where we had the most difficulty. We need to improve.” Algeria’s plan for improving is counterintuitive. Seeking to end a goal drought by playing with no recognised strikers seems strange but that is what they are likely to do against England. Matmour will probably be the man who shifts from midfield to the unfamiliar role of centre-forward. For most of this week he has been rehearsing the role in training, with the 20-year-old Sochaux midfielder Ryad Boudebouz hinting that he may win only his third cap against England by slotting into Matmour’s usual berth on the right-hand side of midfield. “We have tried a few formats in training but, yes, that system is a possibility,” Matmour says cagily. In truth, the manager Saâdane has little alternative but to try such tinkering. The striker who started against Slovenia, Rafik Djebbour, showed that he is so far out of form he may never find his way back while the player who came on for him as a substitute in that match, Abdelkader Ghezzal, got sent off within 15 minutes and will be suspended tomorrow. The only other striker in the squad is the country’s top scorer, Rafik Saïfi, but after an injury-plagued season the 35-year-old is unlikely to start. Matmour is generally viewed as more of a creator than a scorer – he has struck just two goals in his 23 appearances for his country – but the reason he seems set to start up front tomorrow is that Saâdane believes his speed will trouble John Terry and Jamie Carragher. Matmour said he has not asked his Portsmouth-based team-mate, Nadir Belhadj, about any vulnerabilities in the England team that might be exploited because “we all know the English players already because they play for the biggest clubs in the world and we watch them on television every week”. But Belhadj sounds as if he may have offered some tips anyway. The flying left-back did, after all, tell the Algerian magazine Le Buteur this week that “England’s weakness is their defence. It is easy to penetrate.” Matmour is more diplomatic but agrees that England have imperfections. “Although they are deservedly one of the favourites for the tournament and have brilliant individuals in every position, sometimes great individuals don’t make for a great team,” he says. “Some of them don’t seem to be in form and the team maybe lacks cohesion. We respect them, but we know we can do something against them.” Matmour suggests England’s manager may have erred in his preparation, notably by not publicly committing to Robert Green following the goalkeeper’s gaffe against the USA. Green’s Algerian counterpart, Faouzi Chaouchi, blundered against Slovenia but Saâdane quickly announced that there would be no change in goal against England. The coach could, though, be forced into an alteration because Chaouchi has a knee injury which caused him to miss training yesterday. Saâdane is in the habit of dispelling doubts from the minds of outfield players by revealing his starting line-up two days before matches. “Psychologically you need that time to prepare. I wouldn’t like having to wait until the last minute to find out whether I’m playing.” Plainly Matmour does not like doubt. That is why he scoffs at suggestions that Algeria might play for a draw against England in the hope of beating the USA in their last game and, with other results helping them, reaching the second round with four points. “That’s all too complicated,” he snorts. “The England match is a final for us. We’ll be aiming for victory.” • The PUMA Africa Unity kit is the official third strip of Algeria, Cameroon, Ghana and the Ivory Coast. Sales of the shirt raise money for biodiversity causes in Africa Algeria World Cup 2010 Group C World Cup 2010 Paul Doyle guardian.co.uk

Read more from the original source:
World Cup 2010: Algeria aiming to vent their frustrations on England

US Open: The best course in the world? Pebble Beach doesn’t come close | Lawrence Donegan

Look beyond the crashing waves, golden sands and dolphins playing in the surf, and you’ll find some daftly difficult holes Everybody loves Pebble Beach. Phil loves it. Tiger loves it. Westie loves it. Poults loves it. Best course in the world. Right? Well, best-looking course in the world, perhaps, (although members at the New South Wales club in Australia, may beg to differ). Pebble, to use the vernacular, photographs better than any course in the world – the crashing waves, the golden sands, the dolphins playing in the surf, the prehistoric rock formations, the ludicrously overpriced and oversized homes dotted around the place – and this week viewers will be treated to some stunning television pictures, especially if the sun is shining. But the best course in the world? Really? Better than Royal County Down, or Royal Melbourne, or Muirfield, or Augusta National, or the Old Course at St Andrews, or Pasatiempo, an Alister MacKenzie-designed masterpiece 40 miles north of this week’s US Open venue, or Pacific Grove Municipal (the poor man’s Pebble, as it’s known locally), a $30-a-round track just a couple of miles along the coastline? OK, Pebble Beach may just shade Pacific Grove because it is in better condition (it had better be at 15 times the price for 18 holes), but as for the rest – no chance. Pebble isn’t the best course in the world. It isn’t even in the top 30 and here is why; the 1st hole, the 2nd, the 3rd, the 11th, the 12th, the 13th, the 14th, 15th and the 16th. Of those nine, five are eminently forgettable, three are instantly forgettable and one – the par-five 14th – is just daft, as became clear at this year’s AT&T Pro-Am, when two highly skilled professional golfers took nine shots to complete the hole. That is the bad news. The good news is that Pebble has some terrific holes, such as the 109-yard 7th, which this week may become the first hole in modern major championship history play under 100 yards (the USGA’s Mike Davis is thinking about pushing up the tee box at the weekend, apparently). The 8th is other beauty, although personally I’m not a big fan of holes, such as this one, that demand the same tee shot of every player in the field; three-iron to the top of the hill. But the second shot is a beauty – over the rocks and the waves to the distant green. The 18th, a longish par-five that arches its way along the coastline, offering options for the players and excitement for the fans, is another cracker. And then there is the issue of personality. Pebble has two; the parkland personality of the inland holes, and the links personality of the holes that run along the Pacific coast. It’s like playing nine holes at St Andrews and then talking the train to Wentworth and playing another nine there. It’s like reading nine chapters of Philip Roth and following it up with nine chapters of Jeffrey Archer. It’s like driving from Glasgow to Inverness listening to The Ronettes for the first half of the journey and the Cheeky Girls for the next. Good, bad, great, awful, magnificent; there is nothing wrong with mixing things up a little in life and in golf, especially when there are other things to capture the imagination and the widen the gaze, as there are at Pebble Beach. But the best golf course in the world? Don’t make me laugh. US Open Golf Lawrence Donegan guardian.co.uk

See original here:
US Open: The best course in the world? Pebble Beach doesn’t come close | Lawrence Donegan

Commemorating 23rd Anniversary of Reagan’s ‘Tear Down This Wall’ Speech

Twenty-three years ago, on June 12, 1987, Ronald Reagan, standing on the west side of Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate, gave a speech that many believe signaled the beginning of the end of the Cold War. In this extraordinary moment in history, President Reagan challenged the Soviet Union’s Mikhail Gorbachev: General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! Entire video of this fabulous speech follows with full transcript: Remarks at the Brandenburg Gate West Berlin, Germany June 12, 1987 This speech was delivered to the people of West Berlin, yet it was also audible on the East side of the Berlin wall. 2,703 words PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN: Thank you very much. Chancellor Kohl, Governing Mayor Diepgen, ladies and gentlemen: Twenty-four years ago, President John F. Kennedy visited Berlin, speaking to the people of this city and the world at the City Hall. Well, since then two other presidents have come, each in his turn, to Berlin. And today I, myself, make my second visit to your city. We come to Berlin, we American presidents, because it’s our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. But I must confess, we’re drawn here by other things as well: by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer Paul Lincke understood something about American presidents. You see, like so many presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: Ich hab noch einen Koffer in Berlin. [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.] Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.] Behind me stands a wall that encircles the free sectors of this city, part of a vast system of barriers that divides the entire continent of Europe. From the Baltic, south, those barriers cut across Germany in a gash of barbed wire, concrete, dog runs, and guard towers. Farther south, there may be no visible, no obvious wall. But there remain armed guards and checkpoints all the same–still a restriction on the right to travel, still an instrument to impose upon ordinary men and women the will of a totalitarian state. Yet it is here in Berlin where the wall emerges most clearly; here, cutting across your city, where the news photo and the television screen have imprinted this brutal division of a continent upon the mind of the world. Standing before the Brandenburg Gate, every man is a German, separated from his fellow men. Every man is a Berliner, forced to look upon a scar. President von Weizsacker has said, “The German question is open as long as the Brandenburg Gate is closed.” Today I say: As long as the gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind. Yet I do not come here to lament. For I find in Berlin a message of hope, even in the shadow of this wall, a message of triumph. In this season of spring in 1945, the people of Berlin emerged from their air-raid shelters to find devastation. Thousands of miles away, the people of the United States reached out to help. And in 1947 Secretary of State–as you’ve been told–George Marshall announced the creation of what would become known as the Marshall Plan. Speaking precisely 40 years ago this month, he said: “Our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos.” In the Reichstag a few moments ago, I saw a display commemorating this 40th anniversary of the Marshall Plan. I was struck by the sign on a burnt-out, gutted structure that was being rebuilt. I understand that Berliners of my own generation can remember seeing signs like it dotted throughout the western sectors of the city. The sign read simply: “The Marshall Plan is helping here to strengthen the free world.” A strong, free world in the West, that dream became real. Japan rose from ruin to become an economic giant. Italy, France, Belgium–virtually every nation in Western Europe saw political and economic rebirth; the European Community was founded. In West Germany and here in Berlin, there took place an economic miracle, the Wirtschaftswunder. Adenauer, Erhard, Reuter, and other leaders understood the practical importance of liberty–that just as truth can flourish only when the journalist is given freedom of speech, so prosperity can come about only when the farmer and businessman enjoy economic freedom. The German leaders reduced tariffs, expanded free trade, lowered taxes. From 1950 to 1960 alone, the standard of living in West Germany and Berlin doubled. Where four decades ago there was rubble, today in West Berlin there is the greatest industrial output of any city in Germany–busy office blocks, fine homes and apartments, proud avenues, and the spreading lawns of parkland. Where a city’s culture seemed to have been destroyed, today there are two great universities, orchestras and an opera, countless theaters, and museums. Where there was want, today there’s abundance–food, clothing, automobiles–the wonderful goods of the Ku’damm. From devastation, from utter ruin, you Berliners have, in freedom, rebuilt a city that once again ranks as one of the greatest on earth. The Soviets may have had other plans. But my friends, there were a few things the Soviets didn’t count on–Berliner Herz, Berliner Humor, ja, und Berliner Schnauze. [Berliner heart, Berliner humor, yes, and a Berliner Schnauze.] In the 1950s, Khrushchev predicted: “We will bury you.” But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human history. In the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health, even want of the most basic kind–too little food. Even today, the Soviet Union still cannot feed itself. After these four decades, then, there stands before the entire world one great and inescapable conclusion: Freedom leads to prosperity. Freedom replaces the ancient hatreds among the nations with comity and peace. Freedom is the victor. And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures, intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace. There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! I understand the fear of war and the pain of division that afflict this continent– and I pledge to you my country’s efforts to help overcome these burdens. To be sure, we in the West must resist Soviet expansion. So we must maintain defenses of unassailable strength. Yet we seek peace; so we must strive to reduce arms on both sides. Beginning 10 years ago, the Soviets challenged the Western alliance with a grave new threat, hundreds of new and more deadly SS-20 nuclear missiles, capable of striking every capital in Europe. The Western alliance responded by committing itself to a counter-deployment unless the Soviets agreed to negotiate a better solution; namely, the elimination of such weapons on both sides. For many months, the Soviets refused to bargain in earnestness. As the alliance, in turn, prepared to go forward with its counter-deployment, there were difficult days–days of protests like those during my 1982 visit to this city–and the Soviets later walked away from the table. But through it all, the alliance held firm. And I invite those who protested then– I invite those who protest today–to mark this fact: Because we remained strong, the Soviets came back to the table. And because we remained strong, today we have within reach the possibility, not merely of limiting the growth of arms, but of eliminating, for the first time, an entire class of nuclear weapons from the face of the earth. As I speak, NATO ministers are meeting in Iceland to review the progress of our proposals for eliminating these weapons. At the talks in Geneva, we have also proposed deep cuts in strategic offensive weapons. And the Western allies have likewise made far-reaching proposals to reduce the danger of conventional war and to place a total ban on chemical weapons. While we pursue these arms reductions, I pledge to you that we will maintain the capacity to deter Soviet aggression at any level at which it might occur. And in cooperation with many of our allies, the United States is pursuing the Strategic Defense Initiative–research to base deterrence not on the threat of offensive retaliation, but on defenses that truly defend; on systems, in short, that will not target populations, but shield them. By these means we seek to increase the safety of Europe and all the world. But we must remember a crucial fact: East and West do not mistrust each other because we are armed; we are armed because we mistrust each other. And our differences are not about weapons but about liberty. When President Kennedy spoke at the City Hall those 24 years ago, freedom was encircled, Berlin was under siege. And today, despite all the pressures upon this city, Berlin stands secure in its liberty. And freedom itself is transforming the globe. In the Philippines, in South and Central America, democracy has been given a rebirth. Throughout the Pacific, free markets are working miracle after miracle of economic growth. In the industrialized nations, a technological revolution is taking place–a revolution marked by rapid, dramatic advances in computers and telecommunications. In Europe, only one nation and those it controls refuse to join the community of freedom. Yet in this age of redoubled economic growth, of information and innovation, the Soviet Union faces a choice: It must make fundamental changes, or it will become obsolete. Today thus represents a moment of hope. We in the West stand ready to cooperate with the East to promote true openness, to break down barriers that separate people, to create a safe, freer world. And surely there is no better place than Berlin, the meeting place of East and West, to make a start. Free people of Berlin: Today, as in the past, the United States stands for the strict observance and full implementation of all parts of the Four Power Agreement of 1971. Let us use this occasion, the 750th anniversary of this city, to usher in a new era, to seek a still fuller, richer life for the Berlin of the future. Together, let us maintain and develop the ties between the Federal Republic and the Western sectors of Berlin, which is permitted by the 1971 agreement. And I invite Mr. Gorbachev: Let us work to bring the Eastern and Western parts of the city closer together, so that all the inhabitants of all Berlin can enjoy the benefits that come with life in one of the great cities of the world. To open Berlin still further to all Europe, East and West, let us expand the vital air access to this city, finding ways of making commercial air service to Berlin more convenient, more comfortable, and more economical. We look to the day when West Berlin can become one of the chief aviation hubs in all central Europe. With our French and British partners, the United States is prepared to help bring international meetings to Berlin. It would be only fitting for Berlin to serve as the site of United Nations meetings, or world conferences on human rights and arms control or other issues that call for international cooperation. There is no better way to establish hope for the future than to enlighten young minds, and we would be honored to sponsor summer youth exchanges, cultural events, and other programs for young Berliners from the East. Our French and British friends, I’m certain, will do the same. And it’s my hope that an authority can be found in East Berlin to sponsor visits from young people of the Western sectors. One final proposal, one close to my heart: Sport represents a source of enjoyment and ennoblement, and you may have noted that the Republic of Korea–South Korea–has offered to permit certain events of the 1988 Olympics to take place in the North. International sports competitions of all kinds could take place in both parts of this city. And what better way to demonstrate to the world the openness of this city than to offer in some future year to hold the Olympic games here in Berlin, East and West? In these four decades, as I have said, you Berliners have built a great city. You’ve done so in spite of threats–the Soviet attempts to impose the East-mark, the blockade. Today the city thrives in spite of the challenges implicit in the very presence of this wall. What keeps you here? Certainly there’s a great deal to be said for your fortitude, for your defiant courage. But I believe there’s something deeper, something that involves Berlin’s whole look and feel and way of life–not mere sentiment. No one could live long in Berlin without being completely disabused of illusions. Something instead, that has seen the difficulties of life in Berlin but chose to accept them, that continues to build this good and proud city in contrast to a surrounding totalitarian presence that refuses to release human energies or aspirations. Something that speaks with a powerful voice of affirmation, that says yes to this city, yes to the future, yes to freedom. In a word, I would submit that what keeps you in Berlin is love–love both profound and abiding. Perhaps this gets to the root of the matter, to the most fundamental distinction of all between East and West. The totalitarian world produces backwardness because it does such violence to the spirit, thwarting the human impulse to create, to enjoy, to worship. The totalitarian world finds even symbols of love and of worship an affront. Years ago, before the East Germans began rebuilding their churches, they erected a secular structure: the television tower at Alexander Platz. Virtually ever since, the authorities have been working to correct what they view as the tower’s one major flaw, treating the glass sphere at the top with paints and chemicals of every kind. Yet even today when the sun strikes that sphere–that sphere that towers over all Berlin–the light makes the sign of the cross. There in Berlin, like the city itself, symbols of love, symbols of worship, cannot be suppressed. As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner: “This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality.” Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom. And I would like, before I close, to say one word. I have read, and I have been questioned since I’ve been here about certain demonstrations against my coming. And I would like to say just one thing, and to those who demonstrate so. I wonder if they have ever asked themselves that if they should have the kind of government they apparently seek, no one would ever be able to do what they’re doing again. Thank you and God bless you all. Rest in peace, President Reagan…and thank you.

Excerpt from:
Commemorating 23rd Anniversary of Reagan’s ‘Tear Down This Wall’ Speech