Madonna is reportedly moving back to England to film a movie. United States: 1, England: 0. I think this is wonderful news. In fact, I haven’t heard news as pleasing as this since…

Continue reading here:
Chelsea Handler Blog: Open Your Heart, U.K.
Madonna is reportedly moving back to England to film a movie. United States: 1, England: 0. I think this is wonderful news. In fact, I haven’t heard news as pleasing as this since…

Continue reading here:
Chelsea Handler Blog: Open Your Heart, U.K.
Posted in Celebrities, TV
Tagged exclusive-engagement, kristen, Kristen Stewart, lindsay, news-as-pleasing, scuffle-at-lax, states, sure-it-must, TMZ, united-states, weekend, will-probably
paracuriosos The following is an open letter addressed to actor Sean Penn, written by Maria Conchita Alonso who is an outspoken critic of the elected Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez. This is in response to Penn’s appearance in HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher” Dear Sean, WHY? Even though I have great respect for your artistic talent, I was appalled by a recent television interview where you vigorously showed support for the regime of Hugo Chavez. Therefore, I’ve decided to set the record straight for you regarding the Chavez regime, supporting my case based not only on my political ideologies, but on proven facts you choose to ignore. Otherwise, I believe your position would be different. Being born in Cuba, a country where freedom of speech is non-existent, it’s startling to observe how Venezuela, where I was happily raised, is fast becoming Cuba’s mirror image: Dismantling of fundamental democratic rights deserved by its people and citizens of the world. For example, you said that all Chavez-winning elections in Venezuela were “transparent.” Then WHY didn’t the government allow a manual recount of the votes and computer information when doubt set in? After all, how do you explain how these votes that were strongly favoring the opposition mysteriously reflected the opposite results the morning after, thus permitting Chavez to continue on? On what are you basing your conclusions? I strongly recommend that you read a report by the U.S. State Department written in 2009 entitled “The Fraudulent Elections in Venezuela”. We live in a Republic comprised of three autonomous branches of government: Supreme Court, Congress and Executive, thus, a true democracy. Then WHY do you accept violations by part of the government of Venezuela to ignore its Constitution whereby one man, military-educated Chavez, controls all branches of government? His military background is revealed by his philosophy: “I order, you obey and if you disagree you’re a traitor to the country.” And your voice is silenced along with the ability of freethinking. Did you know solely the government controls 92% of media communications? You’ve strongly criticized your own governments’ overspending and corruption, whereby the budget for We the people never ends up in the hands of those who need it most. Then WHY do you support a government with over $100 million in oil revenue that has 71% poverty? Or don’t you know that corruption is so rampant that the rightfully deserving poor never sees a “red cent”? In addition, the fact is that Chavez gives away millions of dollars; belonging to the Venezuelan people, to other countries in order to build a false sense of philanthropy of a man whose self-proclaiming ego is blinded by power behind a communist Cuban-style revolution, expanding such regime. We live in the U.S.A., the land of opportunity to do and say what we desire, respecting dissenting points of view, of course and without reprisals. Then WHY do you defend a government whose stronghold upon its people is so oppressive that a big price is paid for exercising freedom of speech: Persecutions, closing of radio and television stations, jail…and even death? You are fortunate enough to live in a country where you can buy property and claim it as your own to do whatever you want with it. Then WHY do you promote the interests of a government that violates the Constitution by hindering the possibility of development: Land, industries, commerce, communications companies, foreign investment opportunities, financial institutions and private property? This is an everyday scenario in Venezuela. Then WHY haven’t you informed yourself on these facts by reading Venezuelan and international newspapers exposing thousands of cases? Given your sense of community and respect for all people, I think you would defend the security of the citizens in your country. Then WHY do you validate a government that has converted Venezuela into the second most dangerous country in the world, where impunity is above 90% and its people live in a constant state of stress and fear of getting killed? Many wonder if this situation isn’t but a diabolic strategy by the part of the government, something to think about. Do you know that the weekend of March 13th there were 67 counted homicides only in Caracas? Furthermore, in the first 50 days of this year, there have been 140 express kidnappings for fast money (a 50% increase in 2009 versus previous years). After 11 years of the Chavez government, more than 16,000 people has been murdered by armed gangs and we’re not even at war like in the Middle East. In the U.S.A. the arm of the law comes down hard on government or private sector where cases of fraud and corruption are discovered. Then WHY do you defend a politician who promised to sweep corruption, but has ended up sponsoring illicit enrichment by part of his closest allies and civil servants, placing Venezuela as the most corrupt country in the Americas and in its political history? Corruption has increased 68% and inflation 31% in 2009. What a coincidence, Sean that the majority of those “corruptors” are members of the government you have chosen to embrace. You’ve demonstrated admirable assistance to those in need, due to natural disasters or poverty, those with desperate pleas to get their misfortune exposed for the whole world to see. Then WHY do you applaud the efforts of a government that has notoriously increased poverty (65% to 71%), produced scarcity of staple products and created an energy and water shortage crisis never seen in Venezuela? Not to mention the numbers of children begging in the streets. You may have missed it because the government tends to take the scenic routes for its guests. I invite you see the real Venezuela, stay for a couple of weeks without the logistics the government of said country organizes for you and you’ll be amazed with the results in your unaided observations. Sean, you live in a country where your parents had the freedom to teach you principles and respect for entities and human beings, where education hasn’t been manipulated by political agendas of those in power. Then WHY are you in favor of a country where day after day education isn’t plural by obligating a single-minded agenda and lack of respect for family structure? Did you know Sean that in Venezuela there is political indoctrination at a very early age, better known as “brainwashing”? And let me tell you that if parents don’t agree, they will lose custody of their children, just like in Cuba, a country you’ve placed on a pedestal.You are a product of a Jewish father. Then WHY is your fascination with a government that has overtly stated its hatred against the Jewish community worldwide, to the extent that the State of Israel condemned anti-Semitic attacks in Venezuela? Do you think it’s fair that many Jewish-Venezuelan families have emigrated because the Chavez government robbed their personal files when their temples and offices were under attacked in 2008? I don’t think so, Sean, that you would support violence as a means to impose your agenda. Then WHY do you support a government with close relationships with FARC, ETA, Cuban G-2, Government of Iran, Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, among others, which are the most feared terrorist movements in the world? You have said that you applaud the actions that Chavez has instituted for his “pueblo”. Then WHY do you back him up when he himself has recently publicly recognized his failure for effective social programs (missions) in the areas of education, social service and hospitals; where each day the number of the uncared rises for lack of appropriate facilities and respective upkeep, and a country where the mothers give birth in the streets? This you can see on YouTube in investigative programs run on German, Swedish, Italian and Spanish television stations. Sean, have you considered researching the existence of the growing list of political prisoners, including journalists, on your own? For your information Chile, Peru and Costa Rica has that data. Furthermore, many of these prisoners are tortured and their families persecuted and threatened, just like the Cuba you stand up for. Is that what you support when you publicly declare that all those that say that Chavez is a dictator should go to jail? Sean, you have the right to say what you want, but as far as I know, your statements are contradictory to “Freedom of Speech”, the same one you enjoy in this country; by coincidence, “The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.” My intention isn’t to convince you, but to let you know what is truly happening in this beautiful country of noble people, Venezuela. I would encourage you to investigate in depth the “inside story” and realize for yourself the dark side behind the person you choose to idolize. Agreed, Chavez did win his first elections, but like Hitler, he betrayed what the country gave him: The vote of confidence. The following is an open letter addressed to actor Sean Penn, written by Maria Conchita Alonso Al who is an outspoken critic of the elected Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez. Dear Sean, WHY?Even though I have great respect for your artistic talent, I was appalled by a recent television interview where you vigorously showed support for the regime of Hugo Chavez. Therefore, I’ve decided to set the record straight for you regarding the Chavez regime, supporting my case based not only on my political ideologies, but on proven facts you choose to ignore. Otherwise, I believe your position would be different.Being born in Cuba, a country where freedom of speech is non-existent, it’s startling to observe how Venezuela, where I was happily raised, is fast becoming Cuba’s mirror image: Dismantling of fundamental democratic rights deserved by its people and citizens of the world.For example, you said that all Chavez-winning elections in Venezuela were “transparent.”Then WHY didn’t the government allow a manual recount of the votes and computer information when doubt set in? After all, how do you explain how these votes that were strongly favoring the opposition mysteriously reflected the opposite results the morning after, thus permitting Chavez to continue on? On what are you basing your conclusions? I strongly recommend that you read a report by the U.S. State Department written in 2009 entitled “The Fraudulent Elections in Venezuela”.We live in a Republic comprised of three autonomous branches of government: Supreme Court, Congress and Executive, thus, a true democracy.Then WHY do you accept violations by part of the government of Venezuela to ignore its Constitution whereby one man, military-educated Chavez, controls all branches of government? His military background is revealed by his philosophy: “I order, you obey and if you disagree you’re a traitor to the country.” And your voice is silenced along with the ability of freethinking. Did you know solely the government controls 92% of media communications?You’ve strongly criticized your own governments’ overspending and corruption, whereby the budget for We the people never ends up in the hands of those who need it most.Then WHY do you support a government with over $100 million in oil revenue that has 71% poverty? Or don’t you know that corruption is so rampant that the rightfully deserving poor never sees a “red cent”? In addition, the fact is that Chavez gives away millions of dollars; belonging to the Venezuelan people, to other countries in order to build a false sense of philanthropy of a man whose self-proclaiming ego is blinded by power behind a communist Cuban-style revolution, expanding such regime.We live in the U.S.A., the land of opportunity to do and say what we desire, respecting dissenting points of view, of course and without reprisals.Then WHY do you defend a government whose stronghold upon its people is so oppressive that a big price is paid for exercising freedom of speech: Persecutions, closing of radio and television stations, jail…and even death?You are fortunate enough to live in a country where you can buy property and claim it as your own to do whatever you want with it.Then WHY do you promote the interests of a government that violates the Constitution by hindering the possibility of development: Land, industries, commerce, communications companies, foreign investment opportunities, financial institutions and private property? This is an everyday scenario in Venezuela.Then WHY haven’t you informed yourself on these facts by reading Venezuelan and international newspapers exposing thousands of cases?Given your sense of community and respect for all people, I think you would defend the security of the citizens in your country.Then WHY do you validate a government that has converted Venezuela into the second most dangerous country in the world, where impunity is above 90% and its people live in a constant state of stress and fear of getting killed? Many wonder if this situation isn’t but a diabolic strategy by the part of the government, something to think about. Do you know that the weekend of March 13th there were 67 counted homicides only in Caracas? Furthermore, in the first 50 days of this year, there have been 140 express kidnappings for fast money (a 50% increase in 2009 versus previous years). After 11 years of the Chavez government, more than 16,000 people has been murdered by armed gangs and we’re not even at war like in the Middle East.In the U.S.A. the arm of the law comes down hard on government or private sector where cases of fraud and corruption are discovered.Then WHY do you defend a politician who promised to sweep corruption, but has ended up sponsoring illicit enrichment by part of his closest allies and civil servants, placing Venezuela as the most corrupt country in the Americas and in its political history? Corruption has increased 68% and inflation 31% in 2009. What a coincidence, Sean that the majority of those “corruptors” are members of the government you have chosen to embrace.You’ve demonstrated admirable assistance to those in need, due to natural disasters or poverty, those with desperate pleas to get their misfortune exposed for the whole world to see.Then WHY do you applaud the efforts of a government that has notoriously increased poverty (65% to 71%), produced scarcity of staple products and created an energy and water shortage crisis never seen in Venezuela? Not to mention the numbers of children begging in the streets. You may have missed it because the government tends to take the scenic routes for its guests. I invite you see the real Venezuela, stay for a couple of weeks without the logistics the government of said country organizes for you and you’ll be amazed with the results in your unaided observations.Sean, you live in a country where your parents had the freedom to teach you principles and respect for entities and human beings, where education hasn’t been manipulated by political agendas of those in power.Then WHY are you in favor of a country where day after day education isn’t plural by obligating a single-minded agenda and lack of respect for family structure? Did you know Sean that in Venezuela there is political indoctrination at a very early age, better known as “brainwashing”? And let me tell you that if parents don’t agree, they will lose custody of their children, just like in Cuba, a country you’ve placed on a pedestal.You are a product of a Jewish father.Then WHY is your fascination with a government that has overtly stated its hatred against the Jewish community worldwide, to the extent that the State of Israel condemned anti-Semitic attacks in Venezuela? Do you think it’s fair that many Jewish-Venezuelan families have emigrated because the Chavez government robbed their personal files when their temples and offices were under attacked in 2008?I don’t think so, Sean, that you would support violence as a means to impose your agenda.Then WHY do you support a government with close relationships with FARC, ETA, Cuban G-2, Government of Iran, Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, among others, which are the most feared terrorist movements in the world?You have said that you applaud the actions that Chavez has instituted for his “pueblo”.Then WHY do you back him up when he himself has recently publicly recognized his failure for effective social programs (missions) in the areas of education, social service and hospitals; where each day the number of the uncared rises for lack of appropriate facilities and respective upkeep, and a country where the mothers give birth in the streets? This you can see on YouTube in investigative programs run on German, Swedish, Italian and Spanish television stations.Sean, have you considered researching the existence of the growing list of political prisoners, including journalists, on your own? For your information Chile, Peru and Costa Rica has that data. Furthermore, many of these prisoners are tortured and their families persecuted and threatened, just like the Cuba you stand up for.Is that what you support when you publicly declare that all those that say that Chavez is a dictator should go to jail?Sean, you have the right to say what you want, but as far as I know, your statements are contradictory to “Freedom of Speech”, the same one you enjoy in this country; by coincidence, “The First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.”My intention isn’t to convince you, but to let you know what is truly happening in this beautiful country of noble people, Venezuela. I would encourage you to investigate in depth the “inside story” and realize for yourself the dark side behind the person you choose to idolize.Agreed, Chavez did win his first elections, but like Hitler, he betrayed what the country gave him: The vote of confidence. Open Letter To Sean Penn From Maria Conchita Alonso is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading
A new show called the Pregnancy Pact will be featured on MyLifetime TV starting 9pm ET. The show will tackle the issues of teen pregnancy in the United States with brief documentation scenes collected since the year 2008. It looks like a good show and something to watch for. Here’s a summary of what the show will be about: About The Pregnancy Pact: Inspired by a true story, the film explores the costs of teen pregnancy with a story of a fictional “pregnancy pact” set against the backdrop of actual news reports about teen pregnancy from June 2008. Sidney Bloom (Thora Birch), an online magazine journalist, returns to her hometown to investigate the sudden spike in teenage pregnancies at her old high school. Almost immediately, she comes up against Lorraine Dougan (Nancy Travis), the head of the local conservative values group and mother of Sara, a newly pregnant 15-year-old. Meanwhile, the school nurse (Camryn Manheim) tries to convince the school to provide contraception to students to address the pregnancy epidemic but is met with great opposition from the school and community. Pregnancy Pact Premieres Tonight is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading
The new agreement builds on the previous Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) and will reduce the number of nuclear weapons the United States and Russia will deploy by about one-third. It's scheduled to be signed by Presidents Obama and Medvedev on April 8 in Prague. added by: lucasives
Posted in Celebrities, Hot Stuff
Tagged bennyhollywood, current, Hollywood, medvedev, new-agreement, nuclear-weapons, number, presidents, previous, reduction, russia, strategic-arms, united-states
Tuesday night, the secret-sharing website Wikileaks accused the U.S. government of conducting an “aggressive surveillance” operation on its editors. In an email, a Wikileaks editor provided some new details about this alleged surveillance, including tails, detentions and covert photography. In a series of Tweets posted on Tuesday, Wikileaks alleged “State Dep/CIA tails” and “secret photos of our production meetings.” (Read all the Tweets here .) They went suspiciously silent for a few hours. But yesterday, Wikileaks tweeted: “To those worrying about us—we’re fine, and will issue a suitable riposte shortly.” No official word on the Wikileaks site yet. But we asked for comment from Wikileaks, and editor Julian Assange sent us a lengthy email detailing these allegations of “following/photographing/filming/detailing” by U.S. and Icelandic officials. Assange cites specific incidents on March 18th and March 22nd. In the first, Assange alleges he was tailed by two State Department officials from Iceland to a conference in Norway: On Thursday March 18, 2010, I took the 2.15 PM flight out of Reykjavik to Copenhagen—on the way to speak at the SKUP investigative journalism conference in Norway. After receiving a tip, we obtained airline records for the flght concerned. Two individuals, recorded as brandishing diplomatic credentials checked in for my flight at 12:03 and 12:06 under the name of “US State Department”. The two are not recorded as having any luggage. And in a second alleged incident, a Wikileaks volunteer was detained and questioned about the site’s work on a classified video of a U.S. air-strike in Afghanistan: On Monday 22, March, at approximately 8.30pm, a WikiLeaks volunteer was detained by Icelandic police for over 20 hours on an insignificant matter. The police then apparently took the opportunity to detain the volunteer over night, without charge—an unusual act in Iceland. The next day, during the course of interrogation, the volunteer was shown covert photos of me outside the Reykjavik restaurant “Icelandic Fish & Chips”, where a WikiLeaks production meeting took place on Wednesday March 17, 2010—the day before individuals operating under the name of the U.S. State Department boarded my flight to Copenhagen. Assange also makes more general accusations of “half a dozen attempts at covert surveillance in Reykjavik both by native English speakers and Icelanders.” Why the increased pressure now? Assange offers a few possible explanations: Their release last week of a classified 2008 Pentagon report which labeled the Wikileaks a security threat; The release of classified documents relating to Iceland’s economic collapse; and “our ongoing work on a classified film revealing civilian casualties occurring under the command of the U.S, general, David Petraeus.” This is encrypted video from a May 2009 air-strike that killed up to 97 civilians in Afghanistan. Wikileaks says they have obtained a copy, decrypted it, and apparently plan to show the film on April 5th at the National Press Club. Assange says sources told Icelandic media that the “U.S. State Department was aggressively investigating the leak from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik”. It’s hard to divine from the email just how much of this is fact, and how much is fearful speculation. It seems a bit paranoia-tinged, but Wikileaks has good reason to be paranoid. They’ve already been labeled a security threat by the Pentagon, and if they do in fact have this air-strike video—and their past record suggests they do—there’s no question that the U.S. is keeping a very close eye on them. And in 2007, a pair of human rights lawyers were murdered in Nairobi in connection to an investigation into extrajudicial political assassinations spurred by Wikileaks posts. Wikileaks, which is run by a 9-person advisory board, won Amnesty International’s 2009 New Media Award for its reporting on the assassinations. Asked for further comment, Assange replied: “Intimidation makes us stronger. We like crushing bastards.” We can’t wait to see this video. Here’s the full email: SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN THE STATE OF ICELAND Over the last few years, WikiLeaks has been the subject of hostile acts by security organizations. In the developing world, these range from the appalling assassination of two related human rights lawyers in Nairobi last March (an armed attack on my compound there in 2007 is still unattributed) to an unsuccessful mass attack by Chinese computers on our servers in Stockholm, after we published photos of murders in Tibet. In the West this has ranged from a police raid in Germany over an Australian censorship list, to an ambush by a “James Bond” character in a Luxembourg car park, an event that ended with a mere “we think it would be in your interest to…”. Developing world violence aside, we’ve become used to the level of security service interest in us and have established procedures to ignore that interest. But the increase in surveillance activities this last month, in a time when we are barely publishing due to fundraising, are excessive. Some of the new interest is related to a film exposing a U.S. massacre we will release at the U.S. National Press Club on April 5. The spying includes attempted covert following, photographng, filming and the overt detention & questioning of a WikiLeaks’ volunteer in Iceland on Monday night. I, and others were in Iceland to advise Icelandic parliamentarians on the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a new package of laws designed to protect investigative journalists and internet services from spying and censorship. As such, the spying has an extra poignancy. The possible triggers: (1) our ongoing work on a classified film revealing civilian casualties occurring under the command of the U.S, general, David Petraeus. (2) our release of a classified 32 page US intelligence report on how to fatally marginalize WikiLeaks (expose our sources, destroy our reputation for integrity, hack us). (3) our release of a classified cable from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik reporting on contact between the U.S. and the U.K. over billions of euros in claimed loan guarantees. (4) pending releases related to the collapse of the Icelandic banks and Icelandic “oligarchs”. We have discovered half a dozen attempts at covert surveillance in Reykjavik both by native English speakers and Icelanders. On the occasions where these individuals were approached, they ran away. One had marked police equipment and the license plates for another suspicious vehicle track back to the Icelandic private VIP bodyguard firm Terr ( http://terr.is/ ). What does that mean? We don’t know. But as you will see, other events are clear. U.S. sources told Icelandic state media’s deputy head of news, that the State Department was aggressively investigating a leak from the U.S. Embassy in Reykjavik. I was seen at a private U.S Embassy party at the Ambassador’s residence, late last year and it is known I had contact with Embassay staff, after. On Thursday March 18, 2010, I took the 2.15 PM flight out of Reykjavik to Copenhagen—on the way to speak at the SKUP investigative journalism conference in Norway. After receiving a tip, we obtained airline records for the flght concerned. Two individuals, recorded as brandishing diplomatic credentials checked in for my flight at 12:03 and 12:06 under the name of “US State Department”. The two are not recorded as having any luggage. Iceland doesn’t have a separate security service. It folds its intelligence function into its police forces, leading to an uneasy overlap of policing and intelligence functions and values. On Monday 22, March, at approximately 8.30pm, a WikiLeaks volunteer was detained by Icelandic police for over 20 hours on an insignificant matter. The police then apparently took the opportunity to detain the volunteer over night, without charge—an unusual act in Iceland. The next day, during the course of interrogation, the volunteer was shown covert photos of me outside the Reykjavik restaurant “Icelandic Fish & Chips”, where a WikiLeaks production meeting took place on Wednesday March 17, 2010—the day before individuals operating under the name of the U.S. State Department boarded my flight to Copenhagen. The spied on production meeting used a discreet, closed, backroom. The subject: a concealed, scandalous, U.S. military video showing civilian kills by U.S. pilots. During the interrogation, a specific reference was made by police to the video—-which could not have been understood from that day’s exterior surveillance alone. Another specific reference was made to “important”, but unnamed Icelandic figures. References were also made to the names of two senior journalists at the production meeting. Who are the Icelandic security services loyal to in their values? The new government of April 2009, the old pro-Iraq war government of the Independence party, or perhaps to their personal relationships with peers from another country who have them on a permanment intelligence information drip? Only a few years ago, Icelandic airspace was used for CIA rendition flights. Why did the CIA think that this was acceptable? In a classified U.S. profile on the former Icelandic Ambassador to the United States, obtained by WikiLeaks, the Ambassador is praised for helping to quell publicity of the CIA’s activities. Often when a bold new government arises, bureaucratic institutions remain loyal to the old regime and it can take time to change the guard. Former regime loyalists must be discovered, dissuaded and removed. But for the security services, that first vital step, discovery, is awry. Congenitally scared of the light, such services hide their activities; if it is not known what security services are doing, then it is surely impossible to know who they are doing it for.
Visit link:
Exclusive: Secret-Sharing Website Wikileaks Offers New Details On Alleged U.S. Surveillance [Espionage]
Posted in Celebrities, Hot Stuff
Tagged afghanistan, chinese, country, icelandic, light, luxembourg, personal, press, room, united-states
China has overtaken the US for the first time in a league table of investments in low-carbon energy among the G-20, according to a new report by not for profit group the Pew Charitable Trusts published this week. The report found that despite an overall 6.6 per cent global decline in clean energy investments last year, China invested almost twice as much as the United States in clean energy during 2009. Pew blamed the worst financial downturn in over half a century for the reduction in clean techinvestments, but echoed growing confidence in the sector, predicting investments will bounce nback to around $200bn this year. The report, entitled Who's Winning the Clean Energy Race?, said that last year China invested $34.6bn in the clean energy economy, placing it top of the clean energy investment league and well ahead of the US in second place with investment of $18.6bn. Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew Environment Group's US Global Warming Campaign, criticised the US government for failing to deliver stronger national policies to support renewable energy. “I'm worried that we are going to fall further down the list next year,” she said. “We really need to pass policy.” The US administration has been locked in a year long battle to pass a climate change bill that would impose a national carbon pricing mechanism and introduce new incentives for low carbon projects. However, the bill has faced staunch opposition from Republicans and some Democrats and while a compromise version of the legislation is expected to be unveiled in the next few weeks commentators remain sceptical that the bill can pass this year. The Pew report also expressed concern about America's competitive position in the clean energy marketplace, noting that relative to the size of its economy the US clean energy finance and investments lag behind many of its G20 partners. more at link… added by: WakeUpPeople
Posted in Celebrities, Hot Stuff
Tagged clean, clean-energy, democrats, global-warming, Hollywood, legislation, phyllis-cuttino, placing-it-top, reduction, TMZ, United, united-states, Year
Parenthood Season 1 Episode 4 is entitled “Whassup”. The 4th installment of this series was aired at 10:00PM on NBC. Watching this episode on TV is the best option there is. But if you want to watch it again or simply have missed it, you can still watch its replay online via the link above or below. Additionally, you can also find video links to former episodes of this series by doing a search at the top right corner of this website. If you have any encounter any problems doing so, simply contact us via the contact link above and we will do our best to help you out. Now without further ado, please check out the show and episode summary below. Based on the 1989 film of the same name, ‘Parenthood’is an hour long comedy-drama set to be produced by Jason Katims and Ron Howard. The show will address the modern challenges of raising kids in this post-technological world, addressing issues that effect both kids and parents. Here is the summary of the episode: Parenthood Season 1 Episode 4 – Whassup Adam and Kristina try to find out about Haddies secret boyfriend. Sarah doesn’t know how to talk to Drew about becoming a man. Meanwhile, Crosby has a little incident with Jabbar and Julia and Joel are not too sure they can let Amber baby-sit for them. Watch Parenthood Season 1 Episode 4 . If you found this post useful or you simply liked what you read, please subscribe via the subscription field below for free! The DWB team does its best to provide you with the latest information possible found in the internet. Whether be it sports, world or simply just the latest news buzz, we will provide it to you. However, sites that we link to are not our own so please use your discretion when visiting those sites. Nevertheless, we have checked them firsthand to make sure they are working fine. Parenthood Season 1 Episode 4: Whassup [Video Link] is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading
Watch Lost Season 6 Episode 9: Ab Aeterno The show’s 9th episode of the final season was aired 03/23/10 Tuesday at 9:00 PM on ABC. As the end of the series Lost approaches its end, a lot of question are still unanswered. Who really is Jacob? Why are they the chosen one? How is the twist of the last season end? Why is there a black smoke? Are the dead people really dead? like John Locke and Juliet Burke? Full of WHY and HOW question. As the 9th episode of the series’ installment says that: Richard Alpert faces a difficult choice. We still don’t have a clue what will happen. So let’s just sit back and watch Here’s a link: Watch Lost Season 6 Episode 9: Ab Aeterno Watch Lost Season 6 Episode 9: Ab Aeterno (Online Streaming Video Link) is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading
Watch BLue Mountain State Season 1 Episode 12 – Piss Test . The 12th episode of this 1st season that aired 03/23/10, Tuesday at 10:00 P.M. on Spike TV. BLue Mountain State’s new episode is entitled “Piss Test” has the team getting to undergo NCAA’s routine random urine test and the team is all hyped up on doing stuff to clean themselves to pass the said test. Watch the latest episode of our favorite freshmen brought to us by Spike TV. Watch the full latest episode of BLue Mountain State replay online for free. We have provided the links for you where you can watch it online streaming or download it for your collection, it is located above the image and below this sentence in blue font. Watch BLue Mountain State S1E12: Piss Test BLue Mountain State Season 1 Episode 12 – Piss Test (Online Video Streaming Link) is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading
pic from engadget Just when everyone thought that the new Google Nexus one Phone was all that, here comes HTC’s latest creation: The HTC EVO 4G. Guess what, this phone now has WiMax connection for better internet connection. With a hardware obviously derived from an HD2, it also comes with super delicious features such as 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM, 8MP camera, 480 x 800 4.3-inch TFT LCD, with a Snapdragon QSD8650 1GHz processor under the hood, and many more they can offer. Has iPhone finally met its match? We’re just about to find out. Check out the guys in Engadget for more details HERE . Sprint HTC EVO 4G is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading