Tag Archives: united-states

Confessions of an Economic Hitman (Video)

Image credit: StudioJOHO The BP oil spill was a classic example of how corporate greed can undermine sustainability. Nevertheless, it’s hard to ignore the fact that many of the solutions proposed here on TreeHugger—from smart grids to electric cars —will need al… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Go here to see the original:
Confessions of an Economic Hitman (Video)

Time to End Nuclear Socialism?

Image credit: Exquisitur (Creative Commons) As I noted in my posts on soil versus dirt , and on skeptics, deniers and denialists , words matter. So when I received an email arguing that it was “time to end nuclear socialism”, my first reaction was to note the strategic brilliance with which the debate was framed. (Socialism clearly being such a dirty word here in North America.) The actual argument makes for prett… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Go here to read the rest:
Time to End Nuclear Socialism?

WaPo Implies U.S. ‘Islamophobia’ Emerges in a ‘Vacuum’ of Ignorance, Lack of Diversity

Washington Post religion reporter Michelle Boorstein is generally a careful reporter, not prone to outbursts of liberal bias. But the general liberal-media bias that ignorance breeds “Islamophobia” came through between the lines in a Monday story on the aftermath of the Koran-burning publicity stunt week in Florida:   In fact, like much of the country, Gainesville’s racial and religious diversity is minimal. Personal contact with Muslims is limited. Nationally, more than half of the respondents in a recent Pew poll said they knew little or nothing about Islam. In that vacuum, violence overseas in the name of Islam defines that faith for many. The implication is that truly learned people who have diverse human contacts have no logical reason to be concerned about the negative impact of Islam. (The story is not yet online.) It’s also a little odd to suggest that “violence overseas” defines negative views of Islam, when violence in the United States is more powerfully suggestive, from 9/11 to the Fort Hood shooting. There can be a great difference between questioning a mosque that seems peaceful and a mosque that spreads the “spiritual advice” of imams like Anwar al-Awlaki that inspires terrorism. But the Post and other media outlets can have trouble identifying which is which. What’s underplayed in stories about America’s tolerance of Islam is the question of how tolerant Islamic countries are of other faiths. Boorstein’s piece alluded near the beginning to how “more nuanced and franker conversations” are occurring after the Terry Jones stunt, such as “What was worse to see: churches torched in India or Nigeria or a few books in a remote exurban field?” That was the only sentence in the story that dared to imply that Islam is often not a tolerant faith when it dominates the state. Of course, it should seem somewhat obvious that if the public knows little about Islam, that perhaps might be the fault (in part) of the news media, which generally disdains covering religion except when something (or someone) blows up. For example, in a 2005 study of religion and the networks , Ken Shepherd and I found the networks couldn’t find the time to describe the theology behind the Sunni-Shi’ite “civil war” in Iraq:  “In all of their coverage of Iraq’s religious factions and their political aims, none of the broadcast networks ever gave a basic explanation of the key religious differences between these sects of the Islamic faith. For all their warning of impending civil war, they haven’t explained why their differences on matters of faith have proven a consistent source of conflict. ”

See the article here:
WaPo Implies U.S. ‘Islamophobia’ Emerges in a ‘Vacuum’ of Ignorance, Lack of Diversity

Florence and the Machine ‘Dog Days Are Over’ VMA Performance Video

Florence and the Machine may be well on the way to success in the United States after a breakthrough performance on the MTV VMA Awards Sunday night. http://www.bittenandbound.com/2010/09/13/florence-and-the-machine-dog-days-are-o… added by: sumrgurl

Why Terrorists hate America: Koran burning a drop in the bucket

(Article has many links to mentioned people places and events. Link back to original article to read them) President Obama in warning against the Florida pastor’s plan to burn the Koran stated, “This is a recruitment bonanza for al Qaeda. You could have serious violence in places like Pakistan or Afghanistan. This could increase the recruitment of individuals who would be willing to blow themselves up in American cities or European cities.” It’s funny how B.O. (or his predecessor) never cited past American government policies as being a recruitment bonanza for al Qaeda. Only a handful of misguided activists at the Florida church using their own property and their privately acquired copies of the Koran have such an effect in the President’s view. Here is a partial list of the past as well as some on-going American foreign policy interventions that – by official standards – have had no influence in empowering al Qaeda: 1. The combined British/American overthrow of the democratically elected head of government in Iran in 1953, replacing him with the hated Shah and his secret police who the U.S. trained to murder thousands of Iranians. 2. In 1987 the U.S. militarily supported Saddam Hussein in the Iraqi war with Iran. 3. In 1988 the U.S. ship Vincennes, stationed in the Persian Gulf, shot down a commercial jetliner, killing 290 Iranian civilians. 4. After the Gulf War, the U.S. led an embargo against Iraq, allowing no humanitarian or medical aid. The results, according to UN estimates: 10,000 Iraqi deaths per month with the toll including more than 300,000 children. Then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright when asked said it was “worth it.” Albright never retracted her statement nor was it ever repudiated by an American president. 5. In 1998 President Clinton bombed an aspirin factory in Sudan. A number of totally innocent civilians were killed. 6. European armies, rather than native peoples, drew many of the borders in North Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and southwest Asia. 7. The Saudi government, the Kuwaiti government, and the Afghani government are actively supported with foreign aid by the U.S. despite the fact that they routinely oppress their people. 8. The war in Iraq since 2003 that has resulted in a minimum of 97,000 civilian deaths as well as the displacement of more than a million civilians. 9. The war in Afghanistan since 2001 that has resulted in a minimum of 6,000 civilian deaths. 10. Predator strikes in Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan. But, again according to the official bi-partisan view, none of these actions have caused blowback against Americans or Europeans. Finally, we know what the CIA meant when it coined the term “blowback” – hostility over Koran burning. Also, we now know what Noam Chomsky, 9-11; Rick Maybury, The Thousand Year War; Robin Wright, Sacred Rage; and Chalmers Johnson, Blowback must have had in mind when the penned their works. It’s refreshing to know that Koran burning is the provocation that incites the Islamic world and is the only thing we have to end to protect Americans from more terrorism – our imperialistic foreign policy, now under Barack Obama, can continue without any consequence whatsoever. September 11, 2010 added by: Elevator

Gay Saudi Diplomat, Ali Ahmad Asseri, Seeks Asylum In U.S.

WASHINGTON — A Saudi diplomat in Los Angeles reportedly has asked for political asylum in the United States, claiming his life is in danger if he is returned to Saudi Arabia. The report Saturday by NBC News quoted the diplomat, Ali Ahmad Asseri, as saying that Saudi officials have ordered him back to his country because he is gay and had become a close friend to a Jewish woman. Asseri in a letter also reportedly criticized the role of militant imams in Saudi society. NBC said that Asseri, who is first secretary of the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles, was questioned by the Department of Homeland Security after he applied for asylum. The department declined comment to The Associated Press when asked about the diplomat. A call to Asseri's lawyer was not returned Saturday. added by: TimALoftis

Wilkerson on 9/11

Lawrence Wilkerson is a retired United States Army soldier and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. Wilkerson is an adjunct professor at the College of William & Mary where he teaches courses on US national security. He also instructs a senior seminar in the Honors Department at the George Washington University entitled “National Security Decision Making.” added by: treewolf39

NYT’s Blow Offers Fabulous Opinion on 9/11, Mosques and Koran Burning

New York Times columnist Charles Blow wrote a short piece on the ninth anniversary of 9/11 that should be must-reading for all Americans on both sides of the aisle. In fact, I’m sure liberal Times devotees will be just as shocked by ” A Lesson From 9/11 ” as conservatives that take the three minutes necessary to get through it. After sharing his experience as a New Yorker who was in Manhattan that awful day, Blow marvelously tied it all together with what Americans have fought and died for since our forefathers were colonists: My attitude that day was the same as most Americans: the terrorists must not be allowed to win. America would not be cowed. We would rise, our greatness would shine, and our ideas of freedom would remain a beacon to the world. That is why the debate these past few weeks over Islam in America – from the proposed Islamic community center in Lower Manhattan to talk of the burning of Korans – has been so hard to watch. Too much of the debate seems to be centered around the sensitivities of terrorists a world away who have hijacked the passions of a faith, who would see us destroyed and who want to attract more damaged souls to their cause. I understand, in theory, the idea of not stirring the hornet’s nest while our troops are still in harm’s way. But I chafe at the idea that great American debates, in all their ugliness and splendor, should be tempered for terrorists and their attempts to recruit. Blow then shared results of a new ABC News/Washington Post poll finding the number of people feeling America is currently safer from terrorism than before 9/11 is at a new low. He continued: But we simply cannot allow this new wave of fear to make us into something that we’re not. We are a country of freedoms, a country where religious freedom and freedom of speech hold equal standing, a country in which the construction of a building and the destruction of a book are rights extended to all, even if opposed by most. Free expressions are not always pleasant, but they must ever be protected, with no regard to the proclivities of the enemy. This is America, and the moment we forget that, they start to win. Indeed. Our media today, and much of the cowering Left, operate under the premise that we have to alter our behavior to win the approval of our enemies or else expect violent repercussions. Although Blow didn’t use the word, it’s akin to wartime appeasement. As most Europeans found out during World War II, it doesn’t work. The more modern term that pertains to appeasing radical Islam is dhimmitude, a process by which Western nations enact changes to their culture and their very way of life so as not to create unrest in their growing Muslim populations. This is already happening in Holland, France, Germany, and Great Britain to name a few. With this in mind, what we as a nation have to decide is whether we’re going to follow Europe’s lead and start remaking ourselves out of fear that our enemies will somehow retaliate or enjoy new recruits if we don’t. As Blow surprisingly noted, if we do this, we lose. After England’s Neville Chamberlain made a fool out of himself at Munich, stronger leaders named Churchill and Roosevelt opted to not make the same mistake he did. 72 years later, the United States is once again faced with the option of either following today’s Neville Chamberlains or taking a stronger, less-cowardly, more American approach with our enemies. Of course, some of the recent furor concerning a little-known Pastor in Gainesville, Florida, was stoked by comments made by David Petraeus. Although most Americans have great respect for the General, it is possible he over-reacted to Terry Jones’s Koran burning threat, and may have unnecessarily inflamed the situation with his warning. That, too, is up for debate, or at least should be unless we fear that also will stoke our enemies’ ire. But if a diehard liberal like Blow can see that we shouldn’t be afraid of debates on sensitive subjects, maybe the rest of the cowering media can pull out their pacifiers, take off their diapers, and stop acting like freedom of speech is only a good thing if nobody is offended by it. As Europe learned in 1939, if you give your enemies an inch, they’ll take a mile. If we give up this right to make radical Islamists happy, what’ll be next?

View post:
NYT’s Blow Offers Fabulous Opinion on 9/11, Mosques and Koran Burning

ABC’s Richard Clarke Suggests Obama Inauguration Speech Helped Make America Safer

On Saturday’s Good Morning America on ABC, during a discussion of the Ground Zero mosque and the possibility of Koran burning in Florida by Pastor Terry Jones, after anchor Dan Harris brought up the naive liberal expectation that President Obama would be able to improve relations with the Muslim world because of his family connections to Muslims and his inaugural speech reaching out to Muslims, ABC News consultant Richard Clarke suggested that Obama’s inaugural address had “helped a lot” to make America safer before being derailed by recent controversies.  Clarke’s suggestion came after he had argued that recent events have made America “a lot less safe,” with conversation continuing: DAN HARRIS: But, you know, there was all this talk when President Obama was inaugurated that here’s a man whose middle name was “Hussein,” he spent part of his childhood in a Muslim country, he’s made a LOT of effort to reach out to the Muslim world, and, in fact, gave an impassioned set of statements on this very issue yesterday. Has none of that helped? RICHARD CLARKE: Well, it did help. When he said in his inaugural address, “America is not at war with Islam,” that helped a lot. But the recent controversies have undone all of that. Clarke – a former counterterrorism advisor for both the Clinton and Bush administrations who has a history of sharp criticism of the Bush administration’s response to 9/11 – later in the segment vaguely impugned the Bush administration’s reaction to the 9/11 attacks: “We have to anticipate that there will be another attack. And we have to think about what our reaction’s going to be when that occurs. Last time, a lot of our reaction was counterproductive.” Below is a complete transcript of the relevant segment from the Saturday, September 11, Good Morning America on ABC: DAN HARRIS: Let’s talk about all of this now with Richard Clarke, who was the counterterrorism czar in both the Clinton and Bush administrations. And he was in that position on 9/11. He’s now an ABC News consultant. He joins us from Virginia. Richard, good morning to you. RICHARD CLARKE ABC NEWS CONSULTANT: Good morning, Dan. HARRIS: So, even though this Koran burning has been called off, do you think the damage has been done? Has it made us less safe, do you think? CLARKE: It’s made us a lot less safe. Whenever we do things that support bin Laden’s theory that America is at war with Islam, that strengthens his recruitment process. So he’s probably recruited thousands of more adherents over the last few weeks while we argued about a mosque in New York and Koran burning. HARRIS: But, you know, there was all this talk when President Obama was inaugurated that here’s a man whose middle name was “Hussein,” he spent part of his childhood in a Muslim country, he’s made a LOT of effort to reach out to the Muslim world, and, in fact, gave an impassioned set of statements on this very issue yesterday. Has none of that helped? CLARKE: Well, it did help. When he said in his inaugural address, “America is not at war with Islam,” that helped a lot. But the recent controversies have undone all of that. And the average Muslim in Indonesia or India or Pakistan could be forgiven for thinking that the United States really is at war with Islam. And that’s the fuel that bin Laden needs to get support, financial support, suicide bombers, to get people who will join the al-Qaeda cause. HARRIS: Martha Raddatz brought this up in her piece. Why have we not found Osama bin Laden nine years after the fact? CLARKE: Well, you know, the world has billions of people on it, and finding one person has always proved difficult when they don’t want to be found. But, as General Petraeus said in your piece, he is out there. He is influential. He is still issuing orders. And he’s still issuing orders to attack the United States. HARRIS: You were in the White House, as we said, nine years ago, on 9/11. As you look out at the world right now and you survey our anti-terror defenses in this country, what keeps you up at night? What is our biggest vulnerability? CLARKE: Well, it’s still possible for a handful of people – I mean, even if al-Qaeda is reduced to 150 or 200 people – it’s still possible for 10 or 12 to come to the United States. They could even be people with American passports who went overseas and got trained and came back – to get into the United States and cause an attack. It’s always going to be possible, no matter what we do. So we have to anticipate that there will be another attack. And we have to think about what our reaction’s going to be when that occurs. Last time, a lot of our reaction was counterproductive. And this time, I hope if it happens, we are more realistic. Now, we all want it not to happen, but stopping every terrorist attack is almost impossible. HARRIS: Have our defenses improved measurably, do you think? CLARKE: Yeah, they have in some areas. Certainly, aviation security is much better. But the sort of attack that occurred on the London subway a few years ago on 7/7, that sort of attack could take place on any one of the American subway systems today. There’s some targets that are just really, really tough to protect, no matter what you do. HARRIS: Richard Clarke, thank you very much. We appreciate your input on this anniversary. CLARKE: Thank you, Dan.

More:
ABC’s Richard Clarke Suggests Obama Inauguration Speech Helped Make America Safer

911 Memorial, September 11 – The Memorial

Our world changed forever on September 11th, 2001 In memories of September 11, we must all find the wisdom, comfort and strength to move forward. But we must always remember those who were lost, who died living their lives with the freedom we so cherish. List below stands as a memorial, and will remain for 911 Memorial, September 11 – The Memorial is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading