Tag Archives: united-states

In Rare Flash of Insight, Ed Schultz Asks if Obama Admin Deliberately Inflamed Koran Burning Controversy

Just as quickly as Ed Schultz revealed he is capable of cognition, the liberal radio host and aspiring MSNBC arsonist regressed to himself. Here’s Schultz on his radio show yesterday talking about criticism from General David Petraeus, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama of an obscure pastor’s vow to burn copies of the Koran, thereby elevating it to international news ( link here for audio) — So now, it was General Petraeus who first went on record and talked about this. I mean, that took it to a whole new level, didn’t it? And then it’s Hillary Clinton and now it’s the president of the United States on ‘Good Morning America.’ I mean, you know who ought to put the mission accomplished sign up is this nutjob down in Florida. He’s got a congregation of 50 people. He’s been discredited by a lot of people who have worked with him. But he is getting an insurmountable amount of attention and, yes, I’m talking about it because the president talked about it! I don’t think this has been managed properly.  I don’t think they’ve handled this right. I want to know if General Petraeus made all these comments about this nutjob pastor down in Florida before the White House knew about it. Because all that did was inflame the situation! It’s almost as if they want the radical world to start going nuts and helding (sic) all these demonstrations across the world. Does this make sense to you ’cause that’s where I’m at. More along the same lines from Schultz that hour ( audio here ) — This is at the highest level now! Now either they manufactured it to get to the highest level and they wanted it to be at the highest level to show the American people that this is what the nutjobs are doing over on the right and expose their strategy for dividing the country. Maybe that’s it! I don’t know. But I just can’t help but think. Not for long, given how this to Schultz is an unfamiliar realm. By the second hour of his radio show Thursday, he had dutifully returned to the Obama fold ( audio here ) — This is example 1A that (Rahm) Emanuel should leave. And this is a horrible situation that the president has got himself in. Unless it was all manufactured to do this to prove that the righties are just a bunch of nutjobs and this is what it ends up when they start dividing people. But I really, I think that’s a real stab in the dark, I really do. I don’t think that. So close, so close, to performing a public service.

Follow this link:
In Rare Flash of Insight, Ed Schultz Asks if Obama Admin Deliberately Inflamed Koran Burning Controversy

US Objects to Its Airlines Having to Pay For Their Pollution in EU Emission Trading Scheme

photo: Josh Beasley via flickr This one’s been inbound for a couple of years now, the United States objecting to the European Union’s plans to make foreign airlines start paying for the carbon emissionsM from landing and taking off there from 2012, but as the New York Times reports, the US is upping the pres… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the original here:
US Objects to Its Airlines Having to Pay For Their Pollution in EU Emission Trading Scheme

Snooki Busted For Texting While Driving

Newark mayor calls ‘Jersey Shore’ star out after she tweets while stuck in traffic. By Gil Kaufman Snooki Photo: Jerritt Clark/ Getty Images After making a plea deal to avoid a disorderly conduct charge and jail time on Wednesday (September 8), “Jersey Shore” star Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi vowed to turn over a new leaf. The pint-sized “Shore” party starter took offense at comparisons to troubled actress Lindsay Lohan after her appearance in a Seaside Heights, New Jersey courtroom, and Snickers’ lawyer promised that his client was done with running afoul of the law. Well, that was fast. Snooks, 22, hasn’t been arrested, but she did break one of the Garden State’s laws — and doing so landed her a virtual smackdown from telegenic Newark mayor Cory Booker. “Ugh stuck in newark traffic is no fun,” Snooki tweeted just hours after leaving the court room on Wednesday. Less than half an hour later, a still-exasperated Snooki added , “Omg why I got a stick shift I will never know. Stop and go traffic I’m killen myself here :(.” But then, according to the Huffington Post , Newark boss Booker caught wind of the tweets and reminded the big-haired reality star that, technically, she was breaking the law. New Jersey passed a text messaging while driving ban in 2008. The first offense carries a $100 fine, which can be levied even if the driver hasn’t been pulled over for another traffic infraction. “Snooki! I’m the mayor where R U so I can give u a ticket 4 texting & driving we needs revenue!” he tweeted . Booker had some help from a follower, who wrote, “Cory! Hasn’t she heard of Oprah’s No Phone Zone pledge?” a reference to TV titan Oprah Winfrey ‘s drive to get her fans to agree not to text while driving to increase safety on the roads. “Definitely going 2 tell @Oprah on her. @sn00ki needs an intervention,” Booker replied . Though Snooki didn’t respond to the Mayor’s threat, Booker did get some props from United States Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, who tweeted , “Thanks for spreading the word about the dangers of texting while driving @Corybooker!” Snooki and her “Jersey Shore” castmates will present a Moonman at Sunday’s MTV Video Music Awards . Related Photos Jersey Shore (Season 2) | Snooki

Original post:
Snooki Busted For Texting While Driving

Wash Post’s Anne Kornblut: Why, Despite Obama’s Healing Efforts, Is There So Much Anti-Muslim ‘Resentment?’

Washington Post staff writer Anne Kornblut used her question at a White House press conference on Friday to worry that, despite Barack Obama making it a “priority,” anti-Muslim “suspicion” still existed in America. She queried the President, ” Nine years after the September 11th attacks, why do you think it is that we are now seeing such an increase in suspicion and outright resentment of Islam, especially given that it has been one of your priorities to improve relations with the Muslim world? ” [MP3 audio here .] Obama’s response seemed to echo his infamous 2008 comment about Americans being “bitter” and “clinging” to their guns. He proclaimed, “You know, I think that at a time when the country is anxious generally and going through a tough time, then, you know, fears can surface, suspicions, divisions can surface in a society. And, so, I think that plays a role in it.” On April 11, 2008 , the then-Senator condescended, “It’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Of course, Kornblut had no follow-up and didn’t challenge Obama on his latest assertion. A transcript of the September 10 question and answer can be found below: 11:32 ANNE KORNBLUT: Thank you, Mr. President. Nine years after the September 11 th attacks, why do you think it is that we are now seeing such an increase in suspicion and outright resentment of Islam, especially given that it has been one of your priorities to improve relations with the Muslim world? BARACK OBAMA: You know, I think that at a time when the country is anxious generally and going through a tough time, then, you know, fears can surface, suspicions, divisions can surface in a society. And, so, I think that plays a role in it. One of the things that I most admired about President Bush was after 9/11, him being crystal clear about the fact that we were not at war with Islam. We were at war with terrorists and murderers who had perverted Islam, had stolen its banner to carry out its outrageous acts. I was so proud of the country rallying around that idea, that notion that we are not going to be divided by religion. We’re not going to be divided by ethnicity. We are all Americans and we stand together against those who would try to do us harm. And that’s what we’ve done over the last nine years. We should take great pride in that. And I think it is absolutely important now for the overwhelming majority of the American people to hang on to that thing that is best in us, a belief in religious tolerance, clarity about who are enemies are. Our enemies are al Qaeda and their allies who are trying to kill us, but have killed more Muslims than just about anybody on Earth. You know, we have to make sure that we don’t start turning on each other and I will do everything that I can as long as I’m President of the United States to remind the American people that we are one nation under God and we may call that god different names. But we remain one nation and, you know, as somebody who, you know, relies heavily on my Christian faith in my job, I understand, you know, that the passions that religious faith can, can raise. But I’m also respectful that people of different faiths can practice their religion, even if they don’t subscribe to the exact same notions that I do. And that they are still good people and they are my neighbors and they are my friends and they are fighting alongside us in our battles. And, you know, I want to make sure that this country retains that sense of purpose. And I think tomorrow is a wonderful day for us to remind ourselves of that.

View post:
Wash Post’s Anne Kornblut: Why, Despite Obama’s Healing Efforts, Is There So Much Anti-Muslim ‘Resentment?’

CMI’s Burchfiel: Craigslist Has ‘Social Responsibility’ to Address Prostitution

The popular classifieds website Craigslist may not have a legal liability when it comes to use of its services for sex trafficking and prostitution, but they have a social responsibility to address the issue, Culture and Media Institute Assistant Editor Nathan Burchfiel told CBN’s “Newswatch” Sept. 9. The site recently shut down its “Adult Services” section after 17 state attorneys general sent a letter to the company outlining its role in illegal activities including child prostitution and sex trafficking. The section is no longer available to U.S. users, but Burchfiel pointed out that the change doesn’t seem to have had much effect. “What they’ve done is blocked off this one section of the site in the United States only, it’s still available internationally, and these companies, these businesses that have been advertising essentially prostitution, some of them underage prostitution, illegal sex trafficking, have just moved those ads to different parts of the site,” he told anchor Wendy Griffith. “They’re still getting up there. They’re still really easy to find, frankly.” A Sept. 8 Culture and Media Institute report noted that while Craigslist appears to have addressed the issue, ads for brothels and other “adult services” are still readily available across the site. Dozens of listings appeared in other sections of the Washington, D.C., Craigslist, including numerous ads for business under investigation by local authorities. When asked if there would be a change from the company, Burchfiel expressed skepticism. “Given their history, the way that they’ve addressed this issue in the past, it’s not really likely,” he said. “It’s unfortunate, because in spite of the fact that they might not have any legal liability on the issue, they really have a social responsibility as a company of the size and influence that Craigslist is to do something about this. Burchfiel added, “Not only is it an issue where they’re helping people commit illegal acts and in often cases making people victims of horrible crimes, but they’re doing this on a forum that’s really easily accessible to anyone, including kids. It’s not a site where you have to register or prove that you’re a certain age to get access to. So there’s a lot of social responsibility issues that trump the legal issues that aren’t really there.”

More here:
CMI’s Burchfiel: Craigslist Has ‘Social Responsibility’ to Address Prostitution

Was Obama’s Choice to Pass on Climate a "Blunder of Historic Proportions"?

Photo via NY Mag Earlier in the week, I looked at a hypothetical scenario laid out by columnist David Brooks in which he imagined Obama and the Democrats had gone forward with an energy bill instead of doing health care reform. Joe Romm of Climate Progress had looked at the same scenario, and commented in the end that “”Future ge… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See more here:
Was Obama’s Choice to Pass on Climate a "Blunder of Historic Proportions"?

Walk Score Adds Transit to its City Rankings

Image credit: La Citta Vita Lloyd raved about Walk Score’s online ranking of walkability of cities . The site’s ranking of the top ten pedestrian-friendly US cities got Kenny’s attention, as did the ten least walkable cities too. But a good thing just got even better, because Walk Score will now let yo… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read this article:
Walk Score Adds Transit to its City Rankings

Amanpour Paints Rauf’s Protection Racket as ‘a Matter of Vital National Security’

Iman Feisal Abdul Rauf chose ABC’s Christiane Amanpour to spend “several hours” with on Thursday in New York City, and just as she did back on the August 22 This Week when she featured Rauf’s wife and an ally, she again served as his public relations agent, forwarding his claims without challenge. After passing along his denial of any deal to move his project, Amanpour gushingly relayed meaningless blather about his great concern: “The imam went on to tell me that this whole issue is so sensitive because he has to really take care of sensitivities here in the United States and abroad.” Amanpour proceeded to tout that he’s now back from an overseas trip “all about interfaith dialogue and trying to reach the moderates,” and he warned, as he did on Wednesday’s Larry King Live, that if he doesn’t get his way Muslims will murder Americans. Amanpour, however, didn’t describe that as a protection racket or suggest he’s employing blackmail. Instead, she just paraphrased his spin that his warning — about his vanity – is “a matter of vital national security” to the U.S.: He says that this has become a huge international issue, the issue over the Islamic center in Manhattan and also the threatened Koran burning. And so everybody, all over the world, not just here in the United States, is watching. And he felt, and he said to me, that he thought it was a matter of vital national security not to give in or to move that Islamic center. She then played a soundbite from Rauf: My major concern with moving it is that the headline in the Muslim world will be, “Islam is under attack in America.” This will strengthen the radicals in the Muslim world, help their recruitment. This will put our people, our soldiers, our troops, our embassies, our citizens, under attack in the Muslim world. And we have expanded and given and fueled terrorism. Despite what he said, Amanpour assured viewers: “So, he said he wasn’t making any threats or predicting any terrible worst case scenario.” To say nothing of how this awful scenario was set in motion by his quest to put a mosque so near Ground Zero and refusal to address the sensitivities of 9/11 victims. Nonetheless, Amanpour agreeably related his rejection of any comparison to burning Korans when he’s just trying to build a wonderful “multi-faith monument” to “tolerance,” as she described how he called it “extraordinary to try to equate destroying anybody’s scripture with building what he called his center to be a multi-faith monument for cultural and ethnic tolerance and for all religions and groups to come and try to share the moderate ground of the current space.” My August 22 NB posting, “ Amanpour on One-Sided This Week: ‘Profound Questions About Religious Tolerance and Prejudice in the U.S .’” recounted: Not even feigning the pretense of balance, a week after her roundtable hailed President Obama’s initial endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque (GZM), on this Sunday’s This Week host Christiane Amanpour featured an “exclusive” with two GZM proponents as she declared “the controversy has raised profound questions about religious tolerance and prejudice in the United States. And the backlash against Islam has been seen across the country…” Holding up the current Time magazine with its “Is America Islamophobic?” cover, she forwarded the contention: “Is America Islamophobic? Are you concerned about the long-term relationship between American Muslims and the rest of society here?” Amanpour’s guests, to “cut through the heated rhetoric” on the only Sunday interview show with a guest segment on the GZM (Fox News Sunday took it up in its panel time): Daisy Khan, wife of imam behind the project, and Rabbi Joy Levitt, from the Jewish Community Center in Manhattan, “who’s an adviser on the project.”… From the Thursday, September 9 ABC World News: DIANE SAWYER: Tell us more about your interview with that imam today. CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: Well, yes indeed Diane, he’s just come back, as you know, from a rather lengthy overseas trip, sponsored by the State Department, all about interfaith dialogue and trying to reach the moderates. And he says that this has become a huge international issue, the issue over the Islamic center in Manhattan and also the threatened Koran burning. And so everybody, all over the world, not just here in the United States, is watching. And he felt, and he said to me, that he thought it was a matter of vital national security not to give in or to move that Islamic center. This is what he said. IMAN FEISAL ABDUL RAUF, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MUSLIM ADVANCEMENT: My major concern with moving it is that the headline in the Muslim world will be, “Islam is under attack in America.” This will strengthen the radicals in the Muslim world, help their recruitment. This will put our people, our soldiers, our troops, our embassies, our citizens, under attack in the Muslim world. And we have expanded and given and fueled terrorism. AMANPOUR: So, he said he wasn’t making any threats or predicting any terrible worst case scenario, just that he said that this was an extremely important consideration in these talks about anybody potentially moving that Islamic center. Diane? SAWYER: And what else did he say about the equation of the Koran burning and the mosque near ground zero? AMANPOUR:  Well, he said it was really — he said, extraordinary, to try to equate destroying anybody’s scripture with building what he called his center to be a multi-faith monument for cultural and ethnic tolerance and for all religions and groups to come and try to share the moderate ground of the current space. And he said there was no way to draw any kind of equivalence.

More:
Amanpour Paints Rauf’s Protection Racket as ‘a Matter of Vital National Security’

CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

In a Thursday interview with CBS Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden, Larry King replacement Piers Morgan talked about his new CNN show and who would be at the top of his guest list: “Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand.” The second on Morgan’s list: “Bill Clinton, another one….One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen.” At the mention of Clinton, Holden gushed: “Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him.” Holden concluded her report by proclaiming: “[Piers] is a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break….he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him.” While teasing Holden’s exclusive interview with Morgan earlier in the broadcast, co-host Harry Smith gave the British talker a ringing endorsement: “…the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job….He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes.” Here is a full transcript of Holden’s September 9 interview with Morgan: 7:01AM ET TEASE: HARRY SMITH: Also this morning, the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job. People have seen him on a talent show, whatever it is, but people across America say, ‘who is this guy?’ Our Amanda Holden, our good pal, they’re very good friends. We have an exclusive with Amanda and Piers and she’s going to tell us all about the guy. He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes. ERICA HILL: Oh, looking forward to that. 7:17AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Also, we’re going to hear from Piers Morgan, exclusively, about his new gig replacing Larry King on CNN. 7:30AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Coming up, an exclusive look at the man trying to fill some big suspenders. Piers Morgan is taking over for Larry King on CNN starting in January. He’s a much bigger name in Britain than he is here. And our friend, Amanda Holden, who’s a pretty big name herself over there, had a talk with Piers about his plans for his new role.                                      7:37AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Up next, the new Larry King, minus the suspenders. Our Amanda Holden has an Early Show exclusive interview with Piers Morgan. He’ll be taking over that time slot at CNN. 7:40AM ET SEGMENT: HARRY SMITH: CNN has officially announced that Piers Morgan from ‘America’s Got Talent’ will replace Larry King when he leaves his long-running prime time program in January. Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden recently visited with Piers Morgan. She joins us now from London with an Early Show exclusive. Amanda, good morning. AMANDA HOLDEN: Good morning, Harry. Well, some of you know me as one of the judges on ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ Truth be told, I sit right between Piers Morgan and Simon Cowell, quite an extraordinary place to be, let me tell you. On American television, Piers is seen weekly as a talent judge, but in England he’s also known as a veteran journalist who’s covered news all over the world. I sat down with Piers for a personal conversation and he told me how he approached CNN and then campaigned to replace the king of talk. LARRY KING: Welcome to CNN, Piers. PIERS MORGAN: Thank you very much. It’s a great honor- HOLDEN: With that hand shake Larry King ended an era and handed over the reins of his 25-year-old show to British journalist Piers Morgan. KING: With that chapter closing I’m looking forward to the future. What my next chapter will bring. But for now, for here, it’s time to hang up the nightly suspenders. HOLDEN: It was a storied career that included some 40,000 interviews, King’s been the man everyone’s opened up to. KING: Who gave you this ring? ELIZABETH TAYLOR: Richard. HOLDEN: A frenzy of speculation erupted as to who would replace the industry legend. Familiar names like Ryan Seacrest, Joy Behar, and Howard Stern were mentioned. The name that quickly emerged as the frontrunner was actually the British journalist. MORGAN: If I’m as memorable in 40 years’ time as he’s become, I’ll be absolutely thrilled. HOLDEN: Now in one of his very first interviews since the news became public, Morgan says the enormity of the job is still sinking in. MORGAN: I’ll admit, he’s one of my heroes. And what I loved about the show, always, is that he could do a president one minute and Paris Hilton the next and be equally comfortable. [CLIP FROM ‘AMERICA’S GOT TALENT’] MORGAN: And I decided there were too many missed notes. HOLDEN: Many recognize Piers in this country as a talent show and from the show that discovered Susan Boyle, ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ He also happens to be one of the most respected interviewers in the U.K. On his show, ‘Piers Morgan’s Life Stories,’ he’s faced off with prime ministers. MORGAN: Well let me spell it out for you, there are a lot of narcotics swashing around in university. GORDON BROWN: No, I’ve never touched cannabis, never touched any hard drugs. MORGAN: Never inhaled, exhaled. HOLDEN: My husband always says that you – you pump the cushions up nicely – plump them up – and then you whack them. MORGAN: I don’t think I whack people, but I do, I think probably what I’m known for in Britain most is asking very direct questions. MORGAN: How vain are you? SIMON COWELL: Not that vain, actually. I’m actually not. MORGAN: How have you kept a straight face saying that? Actually, I know how you kept a straight face. From the Botox. HOLDEN: Piers’ unique style has made him an insider on both sides of the Atlantic, from Hollywood’s elite to Britain’s royals. MORGAN: I had a lunch with Diana and Prince William when he was 13. She looked absolutely beautiful in the flesh. I remember thinking the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen in my life. HOLDEN: Now obviously, American audiences have absolutely no idea, really, of your journalistic background. And you have feasted on celebrities in our country. MORGAN: Well, I find the celebrity culture fascinating, but I also find a lot of them to be overpaid, underworked, pampered little prima donnas. So when I find whining celebrities, it really gets on my nerves. HOLDEN: With his new CNN show starting in January, it’s not too soon for Piers to be thinking about who he’d like to talk to. MORGAN: Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand. Bill Clinton, another one. HOLDEN: Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him. MORGAN: One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen. I’d also love to get Mel Gibson, what a story he’s got to tell. HOLDEN: Yeah. No matter who he’s sitting across from, Piers is determined to make his mark on TV. MORGAN: I want to become the person that, you know, big stars in America, big public figures, feel they can go to for an entertaining encounter, but they’ll be thinking that wasn’t an easy ride. That’s the perfect interview environment. HOLDEN: Piers’ now show doesn’t have a name yet, but it will be based in New York. He’ll also shuttle between Los Angeles and London. He’s a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break. His grandfather was journalist, as was his father for a while, and he said that he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him. SMITH: Talk to me a little bit more about his background, because we really only know him from the reality show here in the United States and a little from the one in the U.K.. He really does have a kind of a wide knowledge of all kinds of celebrities. HOLDEN: I mean, he has dozens and dozens of celebrities he’s interviewed. And many of them now have become his friends. I can tell you one story that I can share that he – Piers told me that he was actually the person that introduced Paul McCartney to Heather Mills and encouraged him to go out with her. And we all know how that ended. And apparently, Sir Paul McCartney later said, ‘thanks, mate, that cost me 50 million.’ SMITH: Just 50 million. HOLDEN: Oh, and another bit of juicy gossip was that Piers told me that Sarah Ferguson begged him for an introduction to Tiger Woods just – well, not near the scandal, but a few years before the scandal broke. But he didn’t. And I think she had a lucky escape because she might have been on that list of conquests. SMITH: Wow, there you go. Amanda, thank you so much. Love the insight. HOLDEN: Thank you. SMITH: We’re all voting yes for the new do, by the way. HOLDEN: Oh, bless you. Thank you. SMITH: Alright, have a good day. HOLDEN: Loving yours as always, Harry. SMITH: Amanda, thank you so much.

See the article here:
CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

Matthews Reveals His Obama ‘Thrill’ Has Moved Up From Leg to ‘All Over Me’

Chris Matthews is still getting a thrill up his leg, and even further, whenever he hears Barack Obama speak, as the MSNBCer, on Monday’s Hardball, announced to the world “I get the same thrill up my leg, all over me,” whenever he listens to Obama’s 2004 Democratic convention speech. Matthews also revealed he is really sensitive about how his “thrill” moments are described, as he took offense when a guest inaccurately labeled it a “tingle” as Matthews shot back: “It wasn’t a tingle, up my leg, that’s what right wing fascists say. I got a thrill up my leg. Okay? You’re reading the right wing blogs. Start tuning your station.” [ audio available here ] Matthews, however, is quite aware that the rest of the country doesn’t share the same all over body thrill he does as he asked his guests, Roger Simon of the Politico and Jim Kessler of Third Way, “Can President Obama stir us again and help his party keep power this November?”  The following is the full segment as it was aired on the September 7 Hardball: [5:17pm] BARACK OBAMA: I stand here knowing that my story is part of the larger American story. That I owe a debt to all of those who came before me and that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. CHRIS MATTHEWS: Wow, that was America’s introduction to Barack Obama in 2004 in his acknowledgment that only in America was his story possible inspired us. And as he battled through the 2008 primaries he retold that story, and it was electric. OBAMA: My own story tells me that in the United States of America there’s never been anything false about hope, at least not if you’re willing to work for it. Not if you’re willing to struggle for it, not if you’re willing to fight for it. I should not be here today. I should not be here today. I was not born into money or status. I was born to a teenage mom in Hawaii. My father left us when I was two. But my family gave me love. They give me an education. And most of all they gave me hope. Hope, hope that in America, no dream is beyond our grasp. If we reach for it and fight for it and work for it. MATTHEWS: I get the same thrill up my leg all over me, every time I hear those words. I’m sorry, ladies and gentlemen that’s me. He’s talking about my country and nobody does it better. Can President Obama stir us again and help his party keep power this November? Jim Kessler is co-founder and vice president of Third Way, a progressive think tank. Roger Simon, our buddy is chief political columnist for Politico. Gentlemen, with a little bit of sentiment, Roger, try here. ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: I’m sentimental. MATTHEWS: Try to stick with me. It seems to me, that what’s thrilled me, and I admitted it so many times, is when he talked about America. He wasn’t saying “I’m going to do this because I’m a big shot and I’m a brain.” He said, you know, “I was lucky and also I was fortunate to live in this country and, and we can do things on our own without a lot of help from government and big stuff. On our own we can do things. That’s what your piece is about, isn’t it? He doesn’t talk like that any more. JIM KESSLER, THIRD WAY: Right. I think it’s hard to talk like that when you’re in the middle of a lot of legislative battles, but if you look back 10.8 percent unemployment, 6.3 percent inflation, decline in GDP, doubling of the deficit over the previous years and presidential approval ratings south of 40 percent, Ronald Reagan, November of 1982, at the exact moment of the midterm elections he held all 54 Republican Senate seats, they lost a couple dozen House seats, which is basically par for the course. It shows you can have an economic environment as bad or worse as what the Democrats and Barack Obama are facing- MATTHEWS: If? KESSLER: If, you have to own one thing. You have to own optimism. And that’s what, that’s what President Reagan was selling to the American people. A destination, a vision about success and where America was going. MATTHEWS: Was that a confidence in themselves or in his program? KESSLER: I think it was confidence in himself, as a leader, because there was doubts about Reaganomics. Reaganomics hadn’t worked for one moment, at that point, but they understood the destination where he wanted to take this country. And they said, “You know what we’re gonna hitch a ride with this guy. I’m not sure about the program but I know where he wants to take this country” and, you know, he, he, ya hitched a wagon to him. And people stuck, stuck with him. MATTHEWS: Somebody is giving him other advice here. He’s getting somewhere else because this, they’re talking, “They’re treating me like a dog.” This whining almo-, not whining. That’s a knock. But, you know, he’s talking like he’s being put down. He’s not being put down. He’s being criticized. SIMON: No, he’s the President of the United States. He can’t portray himself as a victim. One other thing that the Republicans had going for them in ’94 is that the Democrats were fat and sassy and lazy and didn’t see it coming. Also they had a movement leader in Newt Gingrich, and his Contract With America which was more symbolic than real. But people said, “Oh here it is in writing. This is a good deal.” MATTHEWS: Yeah, but only about one-fifth of people knew about that so-called contract. Let me ask you about Jim’s point, about the basic speech he used to give about America. No one questioned Barack Obama’s Americanism when he was running as a candidate. They didn’t talk about his religion. They knew he had an exotic name, Barack Obama. But that was so much like a lot of our names, they’re accidents of our parents or grandparents. It wasn’t who we are. Now the Republicans have tagged him with that, it’s his identity. He is Barack Hussein Obama. That’s who he is, it’s an identity because he doesn’t seem to wow us with his love of country like he used to, that’s my thought. SIMON: Well I think he’s suffering under the belief that he’s got to something for an encore. You can’t go back to the past. And you saw on the podium the past placard. “Change you can believe in.” MATTHEWS: Yeah. SIMON: “Change we can believe in. Well now people have the right to say, “Where is the change? Where is it? It didn’t happen.” MATTHEWS: Well it’s a year-and-a-half. SIMON: People are impatient. MATTHEWS: Yeah. SIMON: They want to see something. MATTHEWS: But why did they put up with Reagan for a year-and-a-half of nothing but 11 unemployment, 11 percent unemployment? SIMON: Reagan, as Barack Obama is, though in different ways, a very magnetic personable figure that people liked and trusted. Barack Obama, as I said, is the same. By Election Day he cannot improve the unemployment figures. But, by Election Day, he can goose up the Democrats. He can make them confident. MATTHEWS: Yeah okay. Here’s the question. Let’s watch Reagan for a second and then I’m gonna ask you Jim, can a Democrat be turned on the way a Republican can? I know I can. Somewhere in the middle, slightly left but I’m there and I can get it turned on by America as anybody on the right. But maybe, I’m gonna ask you whether Democrats really want to be positive. Here he is, Reagan being positive, maybe talking to the choir. Here he is in January of 1982. Let’s look. RONALD REAGAN: Don’t let anybody tell you America’s best days are behind her, that the american spirit has been vanquished. We’ve seen the triumph, too often in our lives, to stop believing in it now. MATTHEWS: Can a Democrat talk like that? KESSLER: Yes. I mean, look, you talked about that tingle up your leg. I mean you know… MATTHEWS: It wasn’t a tingle, up my leg, that’s what right wing fascists say. I got a thrill up my leg. Okay? You’re reading the right wing blogs. Start tuning your station. KESSLER: My, my apologies. MATTHEWS: No it’s not enough, because you’re reading the wrong stuff. But go ahead, I was just kidding. I can take it. I’m sorry.

Link:
Matthews Reveals His Obama ‘Thrill’ Has Moved Up From Leg to ‘All Over Me’