Tag Archives: villain

Is Marion Cotillard Joining ‘The Dark Knight Rises’?

The French press reports that the Oscar-winning actress has accepted a role in director Christopher Nolan’s next “Batman” movie. By Eric Ditzian Marion Cotillard Photo: Todd Williamson/ Getty Images Are Christopher Nolan’s “Inception” dreams still haunting him as he turns his focus to casting “The Dark Knight Rises” ? Following the signing of Tom Hardy to play the villain Bane in the next installment of the “Batman” franchise and news that Joseph Gordon-Levitt was in talks to join the production, new reports suggest a third star of Nolan’s dream-world thriller could well land in Gotham City, too. According to stories originating in the French press, Marion Cotillard is set to join “Dark Knight Rises.” People magazine, citing unnamed sources, contends that the Oscar-winning actress, who is pregnant and expecting a baby in the spring with French actor/director Guillaume Canet, signed on to the film on Saturday in Paris. A source close to Cotillard, meanwhile, told MTV News that “there’s nothing to the report.” MTV News’ request for comment to Warner Bros. was not returned as of press time. There has long been talk that “The Dark Knight Rises” would rope in two central female characters. Anne Hathaway has already hopped aboard the production to play Selina Kyle, the well-known character in comics lore who is the alter-ego of Catwoman. Previous reports about actresses in contention for the film did not mention Cotillard; the names included Hathaway, Keira Knightley, Jessica Biel, Kate Mara and Charlotte Riley . The rumored second female role has not yet been filled, unless the Cotillard reports prove true. According to People ‘s sources, the French-born actress will begin shooting in London in mid-June — after the birth of her child — before traveling to Pittsburgh and Los Angeles this summer for further filming. Widely expected to be Nolan’s third and final “Batman” flick, “The Dark Knight Rises” is expected to begin production in the spring with an eye on a July 20, 2012, release date. Check out everything we’ve got on “The Dark Knight Rises.” For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com . Related Photos Who Will Be In ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ Cast?

Read the rest here:
Is Marion Cotillard Joining ‘The Dark Knight Rises’?

‘X-Men: First Class’ Star Michael Fassbender Leads Us Through Trailer

Actor talks about two Magneto helmets, being a student and pulling from Ian McKellen’s performance and X-Men comics. By Eric Ditzian, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Michael Fassbender in “X-Men: First Class” Photo: 20th Century Fox Early in the evening on Thursday, the first trailer for “X-Men: First Class” popped up online — the general consensus on the footage being: dope! — and only hours later, we found ourselves chatting with star Michael Fassbender, who was in town to promote “Jane Eyre.” Charming, self-deprecating chap that he is, the 33-year-old actor agreed to walk MTV News through the trailer, pointing out his favorite bits and the scenes that make him cringe and offering some newsy insight into the way his character fits into the narrative. Fassbender plays Erik Lehnsherr, the magnetically enhanced mutant who eventually becomes the villain Magneto. But when we first meet Erik in “First Class,” he’s a close confidant to Charles Xavier (James McAvoy), who is gathering a collection of mutant-students and teaching them how to maximize their potential. As Fassbender noted, Erik is not Xavier’s fellow teacher, but his student. “I’m not a teacher; I’m a pupil,” he said. “Charlie boy is the teacher. That’s the cool thing. He sees the potential in this new race and gathers us all together to really fulfill our ultimate powers, to really unleash these gifts.” In the trailer, Erik can be seen rocking two different helmets. You won’t see a third enter the picture, Fassbender told us, though he stopped short of explaining exactly how and why the mutant switches up his headgear — “There are two versions. There’s that silver one and that red one,” he said coyly. But based on his nervous laughter on the topic, we have a feeling the helmet switch speaks to an important plot development, perhaps the point at which Erik formalizes his change from Charles’ friend to his nemesis. Magento, of course, was famously brought to the big screen in three previous “X-Men” films by Ian McKellen. Fassbender, however, took his creative cue not from the Oscar-nominated actor, but the character’s comics-based mythology as a Holocaust survivor who eventually relocates to Israel after the war. “I always had little remnants of [McKellen] somewhere in here,” Fassbender said, pointing to his head, “but I used the comics as the source material.” Check out everything we’ve got on “X-Men: First Class.” For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com . Related Videos Breaking Down The ‘X-Men: First Class’ Trailer Related Photos The Mutants Of The ‘X-Men: First Class’ Trailer

Go here to read the rest:
‘X-Men: First Class’ Star Michael Fassbender Leads Us Through Trailer

J.K. Simmons Reveals ‘Spider-Man 4’ Character Arc

‘J. Jonah Jameson was going to be somehow exiled or disgraced or demoted,’ actor tells MTV News at Sundance of scrapped film. By Eric Ditzian J.K. Simmons Photo: MTV News PARK CITY, Utah — We’ll probably never know the full extent of what Sam Raimi had planned for “Spider-Man 4,” including widespread rumors that John Malkovich would play the villain Vulture . Sony Pictures bailed on the project early last year and is currently rebooting the franchise with Marc Webb in the director’s chair. But pieces of Raimi’s aborted “Spider-Man” puzzle could drip out in the future. In fact, J.K. Simmons, who played Daily Bugle head honcho J. Jonah Jameson, kicked MTV News a puzzle piece when he outlined his character’s planned arc for the flick. “J. Jonah Jameson was going to be somehow exiled or disgraced or demoted and end up in some little cubicle somewhere and be railing, even more than usual, against the world,” Simmons told us at the Sundance Film Festival . The actor was in town to promote “The Music Never Stops,” a moving drama about a man whose brain tumor renders him unable to differentiate past from present. But our talk inevitably turned to the “Spider-Man” that will never be, and Simmons admitted he was sad to see his version of the franchise die off — not least because it meant he wouldn’t get to cash that hefty check. “I’m still reeling from the rug being pulled out of us,” he said. “I had just bought a house I can’t afford!” Shortly before Sony pulled the plug, Simmons had been eying work on another three “Spider-Man” films and was having creative meetings with Raimi. “There wasn’t a script-script yet, but I had seen Sam a few weeks before that and we talked about story ideas, because on those movies, we always started on the script and we expanded on it,” he explained. “There was a lot of either us coming up with stuff in the room or doing it literally on set — a lot of improv-y stuff with the whole cast in those office scenes.” Simmons added: “He was saying, ‘This is the basic outline, now go bring me funny stuff.’ ” For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: 2011 Sundance Film Festival Related Photos Celebrities Hit The Ground At The 2011 Sundance Film Festival

Original post:
J.K. Simmons Reveals ‘Spider-Man 4’ Character Arc

Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

‘It felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world,’ he tells MTV News of stretching beyond vampire role. By Kara Warner, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Reese Witherspoon and Robert Pattinson in “Water for Elephants” Photo: Fame Pictures For all of the Robert Pattinson fans counting down the days until your favorite actor hits the big screen again, know that there’s now just about three months (94 days, to be exact) until the “Twilight” hunk’s next movie, “Water for Elephants,” opens. When MTV News caught up with Pattinson at Sunday’s Golden Globes (he co-presented the award for Best Foreign Film), we asked whether he thought “Elephants” was a big stepping stone for him, acting-wise. “I think so,” he said. “It definitely felt like I was doing a big movie when I was doing it and it felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world because now it just seems so familiar, the ‘Twilight’ stuff. It’s just like going to a normal job, doing that,” he explained of playing vampire Edward Cullen in the franchise. Pattinson’s “Elephants” co-star Reese Witherspoon told MTV News recently that she couldn’t help but agree with millions of fans about one thing: “He is extraordinarily attractive,” she told us. “I’m not gonna lie.” Witherspoon shares a kiss with Rpattz in the upcoming film and a new photo of the two in a lip-lock may make more than a few “Twilight” fans jealous. But Witherspoon was quick to add that Pattinson is attractive both inside — and out. “Robert is such a great guy from a great family,” she told us last month. “That’s the thing that’s so funny. He’s not really this bad boy; he’s just a great guy and really worked hard on ‘Water for Elephants.’ He really worked long hours, long days. He looks totally different in the movie.” Are you looking forward to how Reese compares to KStew as an onscreen leading lady to RPattz? Tell us in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “Water for Elephants.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos Robert Pattinson On The 2011 Golden Globes Red Carpet Related Photos Robert Pattinson’s 10 Smoldering Looks In The ‘Water For Elephants’ Trailer

See original here:
Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

‘It felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world,’ he tells MTV News of stretching beyond vampire role. By Kara Warner, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Reese Witherspoon and Robert Pattinson in “Water for Elephants” Photo: Fame Pictures For all of the Robert Pattinson fans counting down the days until your favorite actor hits the big screen again, know that there’s now just about three months (94 days, to be exact) until the “Twilight” hunk’s next movie, “Water for Elephants,” opens. When MTV News caught up with Pattinson at Sunday’s Golden Globes (he co-presented the award for Best Foreign Film), we asked whether he thought “Elephants” was a big stepping stone for him, acting-wise. “I think so,” he said. “It definitely felt like I was doing a big movie when I was doing it and it felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world because now it just seems so familiar, the ‘Twilight’ stuff. It’s just like going to a normal job, doing that,” he explained of playing vampire Edward Cullen in the franchise. Pattinson’s “Elephants” co-star Reese Witherspoon told MTV News recently that she couldn’t help but agree with millions of fans about one thing: “He is extraordinarily attractive,” she told us. “I’m not gonna lie.” Witherspoon shares a kiss with Rpattz in the upcoming film and a new photo of the two in a lip-lock may make more than a few “Twilight” fans jealous. But Witherspoon was quick to add that Pattinson is attractive both inside — and out. “Robert is such a great guy from a great family,” she told us last month. “That’s the thing that’s so funny. He’s not really this bad boy; he’s just a great guy and really worked hard on ‘Water for Elephants.’ He really worked long hours, long days. He looks totally different in the movie.” Are you looking forward to how Reese compares to KStew as an onscreen leading lady to RPattz? Tell us in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “Water for Elephants.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos Robert Pattinson On The 2011 Golden Globes Red Carpet Related Photos Robert Pattinson’s 10 Smoldering Looks In The ‘Water For Elephants’ Trailer

Read the original:
Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

‘It felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world,’ he tells MTV News of stretching beyond vampire role. By Kara Warner, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Reese Witherspoon and Robert Pattinson in “Water for Elephants” Photo: Fame Pictures For all of the Robert Pattinson fans counting down the days until your favorite actor hits the big screen again, know that there’s now just about three months (94 days, to be exact) until the “Twilight” hunk’s next movie, “Water for Elephants,” opens. When MTV News caught up with Pattinson at Sunday’s Golden Globes (he co-presented the award for Best Foreign Film), we asked whether he thought “Elephants” was a big stepping stone for him, acting-wise. “I think so,” he said. “It definitely felt like I was doing a big movie when I was doing it and it felt totally different from doing something within the ‘Twilight’ world because now it just seems so familiar, the ‘Twilight’ stuff. It’s just like going to a normal job, doing that,” he explained of playing vampire Edward Cullen in the franchise. Pattinson’s “Elephants” co-star Reese Witherspoon told MTV News recently that she couldn’t help but agree with millions of fans about one thing: “He is extraordinarily attractive,” she told us. “I’m not gonna lie.” Witherspoon shares a kiss with Rpattz in the upcoming film and a new photo of the two in a lip-lock may make more than a few “Twilight” fans jealous. But Witherspoon was quick to add that Pattinson is attractive both inside — and out. “Robert is such a great guy from a great family,” she told us last month. “That’s the thing that’s so funny. He’s not really this bad boy; he’s just a great guy and really worked hard on ‘Water for Elephants.’ He really worked long hours, long days. He looks totally different in the movie.” Are you looking forward to how Reese compares to KStew as an onscreen leading lady to RPattz? Tell us in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “Water for Elephants.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos Robert Pattinson On The 2011 Golden Globes Red Carpet Related Photos Robert Pattinson’s 10 Smoldering Looks In The ‘Water For Elephants’ Trailer

Here is the original post:
Robert Pattinson Says ‘Water For Elephants’ Felt Like ‘Big Movie’

‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring,’ Entertainment Weekly ‘s Annie Barrett tells MTV News. By Gil Kaufman “American Idol” host Ryan Seacrest and judges Jennifer Lopez, Steven Tyler and Randy Jackson Photo: Tony Duran/ FOX In some ways, the 10th season of “American Idol” is a whole new show. With legendary meanie judge Simon Cowell not on hand to offer up his cutting putdowns for the first time in the show’s history and Jennie-come-lately panelists Kara DioGuardi and Ellen DeGeneres off the panel as well, there’s a chance for “Idol” to reboot after a lackluster season nine that saw ratings slip. There are quite a few changes in store , many of which have gotten professional “Idol” watchers excited for the show for the first time in a long time. When the new season boots up Wednesday night (January 19), MTV News’ “Idol” expert and “Idol in 60 Seconds” host Jim Cantiello said he’ll be even more amped up than he usually is (which is super-duper amped up). “I can’t remember the last time I was this excited for ‘Idol’ to start,” said Cantiello, who will host the live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon” right after “Idol” airs, at 10 p.m. ET on MTV.com. “There’s a lot on the line for the show, with Simon Cowell’s ‘X Factor’ waiting in the wings. ‘Idol’ producers are no dummies. They know if they don’t become part of America’s water-cooler buzz each week that their show is officially done. I’m sure they’ve painstakingly cast the show and truly kept their eyes peeled for the best talent out there, not just the best backstories. After nine seasons, America is burnt out. They’re ready to shake things up, and I, for one, cannot wait.” As much as he’s going to miss Cowell’s acerbic wit, Cantiello said he’s really looking forward to new judges Steven Tyler and Jennifer Lopez. “I can’t wait to see the insane energy Steven brings to the table,” he said. “He’s going to make for some great live TV. And then there’s Lopez, who I imagine being deadly serious. I’m thinking business suits, furrowed brow. She’s going to want to be taken seriously, especially next to crazy Steven.” After a few seasons of lackluster performers and stagnant ratings, Entertainment Weekly “Idol” writer Annie Barrett said she’s just looking forward to what feels like a whole new show. “It will have to be, because there’s no Simon,” she said. “I have no idea what to expect, but I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring. Without someone to be the villain, it’s great if they all get along, but will that work on TV? Will it be compelling?” Barrett said she’d love it, frankly, if it was a train wreck, if only because it would make the show more interesting. But she’ll definitely miss Cowell, who for her was the main reason to watch the show in the past. “He was so adept at taking down people and everything he said got to the real heart of what was wrong with that person,” she said. “If there’s no one to do that and it’s all sugarcoated, I will be disappointed.” Both Barrett and Cantiello said they were a bit concerned about the show’s decision to drop the age limit down to 15. “I definitely don’t think the show needs younger contestants,” Barrett said. “It’s already pretty painful to watch some teenagers who are so expertly molded into reality-show creatures … it can be kind of creepy. … I don’t think ‘Idol’ was hurting for more youth.” Cantiello was also worried about the new youth movement, noting that some of the 16-year-old contestants “really choked” on live TV after making it into the top 12. “Opening the doors to 15-year-olds may only exacerbate that problem,” he said. “As much as they want to find the next [Justin] Bieber, they better figure out a way to ensure that the kids don’t crack under the pressure.” There was also some concern that the two new superstar judges might distract from the promised return to a focus on the contestants. “My biggest hope is that ‘Idol’ finds one-of-a-kind talent this season,” Cantiello said. “Ellen DeGeneres proved that a big star on the judges’ panel does not necessarily ensure a must-see ‘Idol.’ The show lives and dies by the contestants it highlights. If they don’t find the most compelling, the most interesting and the most talented group of singers, the show is going to be as culturally relevant as ‘Skating With the Celebrities.’ ” Don’t miss our “American Idol” live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon,” featuring post-show analysis from Jim Cantiello and special guests, on MTV.com tonight at 10 p.m. ET. Tweet your “Idol” commentary with the hashtag #idolwithoutsimon, and we could quote you on the show! Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions.

See the article here:
‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring,’ Entertainment Weekly ‘s Annie Barrett tells MTV News. By Gil Kaufman “American Idol” host Ryan Seacrest and judges Jennifer Lopez, Steven Tyler and Randy Jackson Photo: Tony Duran/ FOX In some ways, the 10th season of “American Idol” is a whole new show. With legendary meanie judge Simon Cowell not on hand to offer up his cutting putdowns for the first time in the show’s history and Jennie-come-lately panelists Kara DioGuardi and Ellen DeGeneres off the panel as well, there’s a chance for “Idol” to reboot after a lackluster season nine that saw ratings slip. There are quite a few changes in store , many of which have gotten professional “Idol” watchers excited for the show for the first time in a long time. When the new season boots up Wednesday night (January 19), MTV News’ “Idol” expert and “Idol in 60 Seconds” host Jim Cantiello said he’ll be even more amped up than he usually is (which is super-duper amped up). “I can’t remember the last time I was this excited for ‘Idol’ to start,” said Cantiello, who will host the live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon” right after “Idol” airs, at 10 p.m. ET on MTV.com. “There’s a lot on the line for the show, with Simon Cowell’s ‘X Factor’ waiting in the wings. ‘Idol’ producers are no dummies. They know if they don’t become part of America’s water-cooler buzz each week that their show is officially done. I’m sure they’ve painstakingly cast the show and truly kept their eyes peeled for the best talent out there, not just the best backstories. After nine seasons, America is burnt out. They’re ready to shake things up, and I, for one, cannot wait.” As much as he’s going to miss Cowell’s acerbic wit, Cantiello said he’s really looking forward to new judges Steven Tyler and Jennifer Lopez. “I can’t wait to see the insane energy Steven brings to the table,” he said. “He’s going to make for some great live TV. And then there’s Lopez, who I imagine being deadly serious. I’m thinking business suits, furrowed brow. She’s going to want to be taken seriously, especially next to crazy Steven.” After a few seasons of lackluster performers and stagnant ratings, Entertainment Weekly “Idol” writer Annie Barrett said she’s just looking forward to what feels like a whole new show. “It will have to be, because there’s no Simon,” she said. “I have no idea what to expect, but I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring. Without someone to be the villain, it’s great if they all get along, but will that work on TV? Will it be compelling?” Barrett said she’d love it, frankly, if it was a train wreck, if only because it would make the show more interesting. But she’ll definitely miss Cowell, who for her was the main reason to watch the show in the past. “He was so adept at taking down people and everything he said got to the real heart of what was wrong with that person,” she said. “If there’s no one to do that and it’s all sugarcoated, I will be disappointed.” Both Barrett and Cantiello said they were a bit concerned about the show’s decision to drop the age limit down to 15. “I definitely don’t think the show needs younger contestants,” Barrett said. “It’s already pretty painful to watch some teenagers who are so expertly molded into reality-show creatures … it can be kind of creepy. … I don’t think ‘Idol’ was hurting for more youth.” Cantiello was also worried about the new youth movement, noting that some of the 16-year-old contestants “really choked” on live TV after making it into the top 12. “Opening the doors to 15-year-olds may only exacerbate that problem,” he said. “As much as they want to find the next [Justin] Bieber, they better figure out a way to ensure that the kids don’t crack under the pressure.” There was also some concern that the two new superstar judges might distract from the promised return to a focus on the contestants. “My biggest hope is that ‘Idol’ finds one-of-a-kind talent this season,” Cantiello said. “Ellen DeGeneres proved that a big star on the judges’ panel does not necessarily ensure a must-see ‘Idol.’ The show lives and dies by the contestants it highlights. If they don’t find the most compelling, the most interesting and the most talented group of singers, the show is going to be as culturally relevant as ‘Skating With the Celebrities.’ ” Don’t miss our “American Idol” live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon,” featuring post-show analysis from Jim Cantiello and special guests, on MTV.com tonight at 10 p.m. ET. Tweet your “Idol” commentary with the hashtag #idolwithoutsimon, and we could quote you on the show! Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions.

More here:
‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring,’ Entertainment Weekly ‘s Annie Barrett tells MTV News. By Gil Kaufman “American Idol” host Ryan Seacrest and judges Jennifer Lopez, Steven Tyler and Randy Jackson Photo: Tony Duran/ FOX In some ways, the 10th season of “American Idol” is a whole new show. With legendary meanie judge Simon Cowell not on hand to offer up his cutting putdowns for the first time in the show’s history and Jennie-come-lately panelists Kara DioGuardi and Ellen DeGeneres off the panel as well, there’s a chance for “Idol” to reboot after a lackluster season nine that saw ratings slip. There are quite a few changes in store , many of which have gotten professional “Idol” watchers excited for the show for the first time in a long time. When the new season boots up Wednesday night (January 19), MTV News’ “Idol” expert and “Idol in 60 Seconds” host Jim Cantiello said he’ll be even more amped up than he usually is (which is super-duper amped up). “I can’t remember the last time I was this excited for ‘Idol’ to start,” said Cantiello, who will host the live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon” right after “Idol” airs, at 10 p.m. ET on MTV.com. “There’s a lot on the line for the show, with Simon Cowell’s ‘X Factor’ waiting in the wings. ‘Idol’ producers are no dummies. They know if they don’t become part of America’s water-cooler buzz each week that their show is officially done. I’m sure they’ve painstakingly cast the show and truly kept their eyes peeled for the best talent out there, not just the best backstories. After nine seasons, America is burnt out. They’re ready to shake things up, and I, for one, cannot wait.” As much as he’s going to miss Cowell’s acerbic wit, Cantiello said he’s really looking forward to new judges Steven Tyler and Jennifer Lopez. “I can’t wait to see the insane energy Steven brings to the table,” he said. “He’s going to make for some great live TV. And then there’s Lopez, who I imagine being deadly serious. I’m thinking business suits, furrowed brow. She’s going to want to be taken seriously, especially next to crazy Steven.” After a few seasons of lackluster performers and stagnant ratings, Entertainment Weekly “Idol” writer Annie Barrett said she’s just looking forward to what feels like a whole new show. “It will have to be, because there’s no Simon,” she said. “I have no idea what to expect, but I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring. Without someone to be the villain, it’s great if they all get along, but will that work on TV? Will it be compelling?” Barrett said she’d love it, frankly, if it was a train wreck, if only because it would make the show more interesting. But she’ll definitely miss Cowell, who for her was the main reason to watch the show in the past. “He was so adept at taking down people and everything he said got to the real heart of what was wrong with that person,” she said. “If there’s no one to do that and it’s all sugarcoated, I will be disappointed.” Both Barrett and Cantiello said they were a bit concerned about the show’s decision to drop the age limit down to 15. “I definitely don’t think the show needs younger contestants,” Barrett said. “It’s already pretty painful to watch some teenagers who are so expertly molded into reality-show creatures … it can be kind of creepy. … I don’t think ‘Idol’ was hurting for more youth.” Cantiello was also worried about the new youth movement, noting that some of the 16-year-old contestants “really choked” on live TV after making it into the top 12. “Opening the doors to 15-year-olds may only exacerbate that problem,” he said. “As much as they want to find the next [Justin] Bieber, they better figure out a way to ensure that the kids don’t crack under the pressure.” There was also some concern that the two new superstar judges might distract from the promised return to a focus on the contestants. “My biggest hope is that ‘Idol’ finds one-of-a-kind talent this season,” Cantiello said. “Ellen DeGeneres proved that a big star on the judges’ panel does not necessarily ensure a must-see ‘Idol.’ The show lives and dies by the contestants it highlights. If they don’t find the most compelling, the most interesting and the most talented group of singers, the show is going to be as culturally relevant as ‘Skating With the Celebrities.’ ” Don’t miss our “American Idol” live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon,” featuring post-show analysis from Jim Cantiello and special guests, on MTV.com tonight at 10 p.m. ET. Tweet your “Idol” commentary with the hashtag #idolwithoutsimon, and we could quote you on the show! Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions.

See the original post here:
‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season

‘I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring,’ Entertainment Weekly ‘s Annie Barrett tells MTV News. By Gil Kaufman “American Idol” host Ryan Seacrest and judges Jennifer Lopez, Steven Tyler and Randy Jackson Photo: Tony Duran/ FOX In some ways, the 10th season of “American Idol” is a whole new show. With legendary meanie judge Simon Cowell not on hand to offer up his cutting putdowns for the first time in the show’s history and Jennie-come-lately panelists Kara DioGuardi and Ellen DeGeneres off the panel as well, there’s a chance for “Idol” to reboot after a lackluster season nine that saw ratings slip. There are quite a few changes in store , many of which have gotten professional “Idol” watchers excited for the show for the first time in a long time. When the new season boots up Wednesday night (January 19), MTV News’ “Idol” expert and “Idol in 60 Seconds” host Jim Cantiello said he’ll be even more amped up than he usually is (which is super-duper amped up). “I can’t remember the last time I was this excited for ‘Idol’ to start,” said Cantiello, who will host the live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon” right after “Idol” airs, at 10 p.m. ET on MTV.com. “There’s a lot on the line for the show, with Simon Cowell’s ‘X Factor’ waiting in the wings. ‘Idol’ producers are no dummies. They know if they don’t become part of America’s water-cooler buzz each week that their show is officially done. I’m sure they’ve painstakingly cast the show and truly kept their eyes peeled for the best talent out there, not just the best backstories. After nine seasons, America is burnt out. They’re ready to shake things up, and I, for one, cannot wait.” As much as he’s going to miss Cowell’s acerbic wit, Cantiello said he’s really looking forward to new judges Steven Tyler and Jennifer Lopez. “I can’t wait to see the insane energy Steven brings to the table,” he said. “He’s going to make for some great live TV. And then there’s Lopez, who I imagine being deadly serious. I’m thinking business suits, furrowed brow. She’s going to want to be taken seriously, especially next to crazy Steven.” After a few seasons of lackluster performers and stagnant ratings, Entertainment Weekly “Idol” writer Annie Barrett said she’s just looking forward to what feels like a whole new show. “It will have to be, because there’s no Simon,” she said. “I have no idea what to expect, but I hope that it can be, if not a train wreck, then at least not boring. Without someone to be the villain, it’s great if they all get along, but will that work on TV? Will it be compelling?” Barrett said she’d love it, frankly, if it was a train wreck, if only because it would make the show more interesting. But she’ll definitely miss Cowell, who for her was the main reason to watch the show in the past. “He was so adept at taking down people and everything he said got to the real heart of what was wrong with that person,” she said. “If there’s no one to do that and it’s all sugarcoated, I will be disappointed.” Both Barrett and Cantiello said they were a bit concerned about the show’s decision to drop the age limit down to 15. “I definitely don’t think the show needs younger contestants,” Barrett said. “It’s already pretty painful to watch some teenagers who are so expertly molded into reality-show creatures … it can be kind of creepy. … I don’t think ‘Idol’ was hurting for more youth.” Cantiello was also worried about the new youth movement, noting that some of the 16-year-old contestants “really choked” on live TV after making it into the top 12. “Opening the doors to 15-year-olds may only exacerbate that problem,” he said. “As much as they want to find the next [Justin] Bieber, they better figure out a way to ensure that the kids don’t crack under the pressure.” There was also some concern that the two new superstar judges might distract from the promised return to a focus on the contestants. “My biggest hope is that ‘Idol’ finds one-of-a-kind talent this season,” Cantiello said. “Ellen DeGeneres proved that a big star on the judges’ panel does not necessarily ensure a must-see ‘Idol.’ The show lives and dies by the contestants it highlights. If they don’t find the most compelling, the most interesting and the most talented group of singers, the show is going to be as culturally relevant as ‘Skating With the Celebrities.’ ” Don’t miss our “American Idol” live stream “Judging the Judges: An ‘Idol’ Without Simon,” featuring post-show analysis from Jim Cantiello and special guests, on MTV.com tonight at 10 p.m. ET. Tweet your “Idol” commentary with the hashtag #idolwithoutsimon, and we could quote you on the show! Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions.

Read this article:
‘American Idol’ Experts Weigh In On New Season