Tag Archives: world

What’s new in Canon EOS 60D?

Okay call me a Canon fan for posting this but I’ve been holding the Canon 400D for almost 5 years and I think I need to upgrade from 3 digits to 2. Canon website posted their press release to give us an idea about the Canon 60D. Back then there were some complaints about the 50D (am I being too generous when I say some?) in fact some said that 40D was way better. I have to say though that Canon 7D was a wonderful addition to the category of somewhere being in between Pro and semi-pro. Canon 60d price They’re having the Canon 60D price at around 1099$ (estimated retail price). Oh wow. This is definitely shouting at my wallet to buy it. Canon 60d : first of many According to the press release they have this whole new cool LCD which is the first in Canon EOS history. Think of an LCD with Vari-Angle 3-inch Clear View LCD screen with 1,040,000 dot/VGA resolution plus anti-reflective and smudge-resistant coatings for bright clear viewing from any angle. Yep, that’s it. Then you also have the multi control dial in the quick control dial. Okay I stop nao. There’s a lot of new stuff to note so Imma just show you guys what’s in this thing: The Soft Focus effect filter helps dramatize an image and smooth over shiny reflections. The Grainy Black and White filter can give a different nostalgic perspective to any shot. Canon’s “Toy Camera” filter deliberately adds vignetting and color shift for a creative option when shooting a colorful scene. Users can also make a scene appear like a small-scale model, simulating the look from a tilt-shift lens, with Canon’s Miniature Effect filter, great when shooting any scene from a high vantage point. And there must be tons of other features that can be seen in this awesome camera. So, I guess this is the model I am looking for to level up to a two-digit unit. What’s new in Canon EOS 60D? is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading →

Mika on ‘Morning Joe’: If Obama Can Run a Beer Summit, He Can Work to Unite Two Sides of Mosque Debate

Picking up where she left off last week, MSNBC “Morning Joe” co-host Mika Brzezinski on Tuesday and Wednesday cast opponents of the Ground Zero mosque as a “destructive” force, “demonizing” Muslims and “promoting ignorance.” Yet Brzezinski advocated Wednesday for a compromise between the two sides to be spearheaded by President Obama. When Joe Scarborough opined that President Obama, along with former presidents, needs to get involved in a compromise, Mika blurted out that “if [Obama] can have a summit in Boston between a professor and a cop, I think he can do this.” MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” panels largely supported the proposed Ground Zero mosque on both Tuesday and Wednesday, although they did show sympathy toward families of 9/11 victims. But the talking heads still would not give full credence to opponents of the mosque. Perhaps the climax of the struggle came toward the end of Tuesday’s 7 a.m. hour, where Mika faced off against the vice president of America’s 9/11 Foundation, Nick Leischen. After Leischen, speaking for the families of 9/11 victims whom he represents , said that the mosque within sight of Ground Zero would be an affront to grieving persons returning to the site, Mika unleashed her tirade. “When you talk about, every year, on the anniversary of 9/11, people going down there and then perhaps having to look at this center, and be so reminded – what are you talking about?” Mika asked in shock.  “What are they being reminded of? Are you kidding me? It’s an Islamic cultural center.” “You’re now – what you’re doing, and very politely and respectfully, but what you’re doing is, I think, promulgating ignorance about who these people are and what their center is, and demonizing them,” Mika tersely admonished the guest. Not to be left out of the fray, Time magazine’s Mark Halperin also questioned Leischen’s arguments. When the guest brought up Islamic history as a support for his argument, Halperin asked him to leave history out of the debate and consider the people who are involved in the mosque’s planning. “When you say looking at the building would be some sort of horror for them, try to enunciate what that means,” Halperin told Leischen, “because again, as Mika suggested, the only way that that should trouble people is if they’re making a connection between the Islamic faith and what happened on 9/11. Otherwise I don’t see where the pain comes from.” A transcript of selected quotes from Wednesday’s”Morning Joe,” as well as Tuesday’s debate between Mika Brzezinski’s and Nick Leischen, is as follows: MORNING JOE 8/24/10 7:44 a.m. EDT MIKA BRZEZINSKI: And I guess what I see is potentially so different than what you see, and that is for the good of our society and for the good of our relationships between communities, I can’t imagine it being moved now. Why would you think it actually does need to be moved? NICK LEISCHEN: Well it hasn’t been too good for our country and our relationship so far, in fact, quite to the contrary. I’ve got to tell you, I’m not a vociferous opponent by any means, and I’m here representing America’s 9/11 foundation. We have an opinion, and that opinion is just that the location of the proposed mosque is extremely inappropriate. We’re well-based in our opinion, because we’re in contact with so many of the survivors of the World Trade Center, and with other 9/11 sites, and with their family members, the survivors, and with the first responders, especially. And I can tell you that the amount of anguish and pain, and the agonizing difficulty that this has created for them – it hasn’t been a good thing. And I don’t believe that it will continue to be a good thing. And we could have, you know, we could have taken the low road. We could have gone politically correct, and said, you know, “No comment.” Because we are not a political organization, and I am not here to join America’s 9/11 Foundation into the fray. We exist primarily to honor the memory and the sacrifices of the victims, and their families, and the survivors of 9/11, and not just the World Trade Center, but the Pentagon and in Shanksville, Pa. BRZEZINSKI: And with due respect and sympathy to the families and family members of victims and survivors, I just, I do – LEISCHEN: But beyond that, our mission has gotten to be, to a great deal of support to first responders. BRZEZINSKI: And first responders, for sure. And I completely – look, my first reaction when I first heard the headline to the story was “Ooh, wow, is this the right thing?” But with further looking at it, knowing that there is a mosque at the Pentagon, knowing that there is another Islamic center 12 blocks away, knowing what else is around Ground Zero, hearing the conversation, and then listening to it being ratcheted up politically, and on the streets of New York – I just wonder now, though, if it would actually be detrimental to turn back. LEISCHEN: Well, the thing is is that, you know, life is full of compromises, and certainly corporations, religious foundations, charitable foundations – we make compromises all the time to, you know, reach our ultimate goals. So I guess the question is, what really is the goal of the mosque people? I mean, is the goal to create a tribute there to , you know, what happened? I hope not. Or is the goal to create a place of worship, and a community center, and to honor and respect people – BRZEZINSKI: Well that’s the goal. I mean, that’s – from everything we’ve heard, sir, with all due respect, that – that is the goal. The goal is not – LEISCHEN: Why is it so critical to place it virtually right on top of the World Trade Center site? BRZEZINSKI: I honestly, from talking and listening to the people who planning this, and knowing the Imam and having interviewed him – I truly believe, and I could be wrong – but I believe that they were blindsided by the response, because they have another center 12 blocks away, the Pentagon has a – LEISCHEN: I think 12 blocks away would make all the difference in the world. I think that having it within the site of the World Trade Center – imagine every year, on the anniversary, when the family members and the survivors who narrowly escaped with their lives come back to the World Trade Center for the annual memorial, and they’re looking at this 13-story grand monument. How would that feel, how painful would that be? How painful is it now? The people who were at the protest – many of them were family members of the victims. The pain that they were suffering was so great, so extreme, it was very difficult to witness or to speak with them. And by the way, I want to to set the record straight about something. I am not a protester. Certainly, America’s 9/11 Foundation is not protesting. We were down there, but we were down there for an event that is an annual event for us that had been planned more than a year in advance, and we had, oh, I don’t know, 5-600 American patriot motorcyclists that came down there and we did put on an event over by the Pass station, and we very carefully and skillfully, using these wonderful motorcycle police escorts from around the country, and we moved our people around the protest so that we would not draw any media attention, or draw attention to ourselves, or that we would be misconstrued to be protesters. But then I heard media outlets that were building us up to be protesters. We polled our riders, and they are definitely opposed to the location. BRZEZINSKI: Nick, though, the question I have, and I’ll let Mark Halperin in in just a second. When you talk about, every year, on the anniversary of 9/11, people going down there and then perhaps having to look at this center, and be so reminded – what are you talking about? What are they being reminded of? Are you kidding me? It’s an Islamic cultural center. You’re now – what you’re doing, and very politely and respectfully, but what you’re doing is, I think, promulgating ignorance about who these people are and what their center is, and demonizing them. LEISCHEN: Well, it sounds like you’re trying to draw me into the controversy. The only thing I can say in response is this. Let’s look to Cordoba, Spain. When people look at the mosque there, what does it symbolize? BRZEZINSKI: It’s not what we’re looking at down near the site of 9/11, not even close. LEISCHEN: It very clearly symbolizes, you know, an Islamic victory that was held in great esteem for a very long time, and that was marked and monumented by the building of a large mosque on the site that used to be a church, where a massacre occurred. I think there’s a very unhealthy parallel there, and it frightens me. BRZEZINSKI: Whoa. LEISCHEN: I think that if they really wanted to be moderate, and if they were considerate about what’s most important here, it is the respect for the people that are most directly impacted by 9/11. I think that’s what’s important. I’m not talking about a Constitutional right. (…) MARK HALPERIN: When you say looking at the building would be some sort of horror for them, try to enunciate what that means, because again, as Mika suggested, the only way that that should trouble people is if they’re making a connection between the Islamic faith and what happened on 9/11. Otherwise I don’t see where the pain comes from.   MORNING JOE 7/25/10 6:49 a.m.-6:52 a.m. EDT JOE SCARBOROUGH: This is why the President needs to get involved. And I do believe that with the President involved, George W. Bush involved, George H. W. Bush involved – BRZEZINSKI: If he can have a summit in Boston between a professor and a cop, I think he can do this. JOE SCARBOROUGH: This can be resolved. I’m going to say also – and Pat, a week ago – I would have said that compromise needs to include the possibility of moving the mosque north. I’ve got to say at this point, I don’t see how that can happen when you’ve got African-Americans being threatened down at a protest because they quote, “look Muslim.” When you have the nation listening to Newt Gingrich, comparing a house of worship to a swastika. We’ll be seen around the globe as the United States bowing to the pressure of an extreme fringe element. (…) BUCHANAN: In the Islamic world, there are Islamic leaders who are saying “What are these guys thinking of putting it there? There are people over there who are saying “America is anti-Islam,” at the same time (unintelligible). Joe, you won’t find Saudis, in my judgment, or anybody of the Gulf Arabs funding this thing when they realize the sensitivity it has for Americans, and the division that’s associated with it, they’re going to back off. I don’t think it’s ever going to be built. SCARBOROUGH: Okay. We shall see. I am always – I am Pollyanna, I believe there’s a way to bring people together and make this thing happen in a way that makes –

Go here to see the original:
Mika on ‘Morning Joe’: If Obama Can Run a Beer Summit, He Can Work to Unite Two Sides of Mosque Debate

Thousands of dead fish surface at mouth of Mississippi River

Estimates of between 5,000 to 15,000 dead fish surfacing at the mouth of the Mississippi River. Water is being tested, and oil has been seen in the area. And gee, I wonder where it came from? BP is trying to gloss over this and take it out of our consciousness as if all of the oil disappeared and everything is OK. They are lying bastards as far as I am concerned. The oil is down below and causing a mass die off of marinelife, only we aren't being told about that because God forbid the biodiversity of the world that sustains our lives interfere with their precious profits. This is truly sad. added by: JanforGore

On Letterman, Brian Williams Cheers ‘Fruits’ of ‘Clinton Economy’ and Ridicules Tea Party

Appearing on the Late Show on Monday night to plug his Friday night Dateline on the 5th anniversary of Katrina, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams bizarrely asserted “we’re still enjoying the fruits really of the Clinton economy,” claimed Tea Party activists who say “we want our country back” want it back “from the Trilateral Commission” and ridiculed their presumed hypocrisy as he insisted “you see a lot of signs, ‘Federal Government Out of My Social Security,’ ‘Federal Government Out of My Medicare and Medicaid.’ But for the federal government, of course, those programs would not exist.” Plus, he passed along how “I’m hearing a few people say” that President Barack Obama won’t run for re-election because he “wants to somehow transcend the presidency,” citing a British columnist who contends he was “never supposed to be an ordinary President.” Williams considered the possibility Obama could be as consequential as Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton: “Jimmy Carter converted the post-presidency, redesigned the idea of an ex-President. Solving diseases and bad elections around the world. Bill Clinton with the Clinton Global Initiative trying to do the same thing.” When David Letterman raised the disparity between gluttonous Americans and kids starving around the world, Williams rued self-centered Americans as he incongruously touted: “We’ve had a good run here. We’re still enjoying the fruits really of the Clinton economy.” Huh? The current economy is doing well? And I thought the line was that Bush drove the economy into the ditch and we’re all being saved by Obama? (Or was he saying the Clinton years made us selfish?) Letterman soon wondered: “When they say ‘we want our country back,’ who, what, what are they talking about?” That prompted an answer from Williams which sounded more like derision than impartial reporting: “If you ask them, they would say from, ‘from the Trilateral Commission, from the big bankers, from the Council on Foreign Relations.’” Williams sounded like he’s still living in the 1980s. The condescending duo soon latched on to supposed Tea Party hypocrisy, which really just proved their hostile naivete as Williams showed quite an imagine as to the signs held up at Tea Party events and dismissed it all as simply anger caused by people upset by the bad economy: DAVID LETTERMAN: And again the popular inconsistency that is cited is “we don’t want the nationalized health care. But by god we still want our Medicare and our Medicaid.” How do they reconcile that? BRIAN WILLIAMS: Well, you see a lot of signs, “Federal Government Out of My Social Security,” “Federal Government Out of My Medicare and Medicaid.” But for the federal government, of course, those programs would not exist. A lot of it is just raw anger being translated onto signs and in slogans because people are on the downside of a bad economy. So much for “still enjoying the fruits of the Clinton economy.” From the Monday night, August 23 Late Show with David Letterman on CBS: DAVID LETTERMAN: There are two food channels, two food networks. One’s motto is “Stay hungry.” “Stay hungry.” There are cupcake shows, there are cupcake wars, there are cake shows, there are let’s build a cake. “Who can build a cake that looks more like a reclining chair?” And then there’s one show where a guy goes out and eats as much as can. “Bring me all the food in your house. I’ll eat it.” Three million people in this country do not get enough to eat and every six seconds, an infant in this world dies of starvation. How, how do you explain the disparity? BRIAN WILLIAMS: Ask your friends at the World Food Program and they’ll tell you the same thing. We’re a highly generous nation. And we like to think of ourselves as a very generous people. But we’ve had a good run here. We’re still enjoying the fruits really of the Clinton economy. And an ethos — I still come back to this that says you’re the star. It’s about you. Listen to the commercials on all those channels and the message is all in the first person in ways we never ever used or would dream of in the time of say Mad Men, for a modern television reference. So I think it’s that. I think out of sight, out of mind, however, is what sends children around the world to bed hungry and kills them ultimately. …. LETTERMAN: Now when the Tea Party formed, or when I think it formed, or when I read about the formation of it, I thought this is great. This is great. People have gotten together and said “holy god, we’ve lost all our money, our pension funds are gone. Nobody seems to know where the money goes. The government raises all this money to bail out huge corporations, our money is still gone. Our retirement funds, everything is gone. We don’t like this. We think we can do a better job. We’re going to form another political party.” That’s great. That’s all part of the luxury of being born in this country. You can do that. You should do that. We thrive on that sort of thing. Now I hear them saying things like “we want our country back.” And I’m having trouble deciding who took it, where did it go. You know, when they say “we want our country back,” who, what, what are they talking about? WILLIAMS: …You’ve latched on Dave, in what is Topic 5 for those playing our home game, you’ve latched on to sloganeering, which is as fine as an American tradition as any Tom Jefferson was involved in. And it makes people feel better to say “take our country back.” If you ask them, they would say from, “from the Trilateral Commission, from the big bankers, from the Council on Foreign Relations.” …. LETTERMAN: A friend of mine, I said there’s going to be a Tea Party convention up the road. I said go there and let me hear what they’re saying. Do they have a platform? Do they have solutions? And she said “well, no, not so much. It was more about we want our country back and are you with us and this and that and attracting support.” Which I understand is part of a growing movement. But to get any kind of traction, don’t you want to hear, oh here’s what we’re going to do different. I mean let’s face it, you could get elected, Harry Truman could get elected, and because of the politics of the day and the bureaucracy, it’s going to be a pretty tough slog for anybody. WILLIAMS: …People’s anger goes to their money. They do kind of generically want control back. They see a government so big and yet a government that says, “wait a minute, stop an oil leak a mile down under the water. Oh, we have nothing for that, that’s BP’s technology. We’re going to put an admiral here in charge and watch BP for you, but I swear we’ve got this covered.” LETTERMAN: And again the popular inconsistency that is cited is “we don’t want the nationalized health care. But by god we still want our Medicare and our Medicaid.” How do they reconcile that? WILLIAMS: Well, you see a lot of signs, “Federal Government Out of My Social Security,” “Federal Government Out of My Medicare and Medicaid,” but for the federal government, of course, those programs would not exist. A lot of it is just raw anger being translated onto signs and in slogans because people are on the downside of a bad economy. …. WILLIAMS: I think you’re going to see anger, in some form or fashion, translated at the ballot box. LETTERMAN: And projecting from that, are we looking at a one-term President? WILLIAMS: You know what, and I think the British Telegraph last night online there was a column saying he wants to be. And I’m hearing a few people say this, that he wants to somehow transcend the presidency. He was never supposed to be, or so this columnist’s theory goes, never supposed to be an ordinary President. And so this would be extraordinary to not do the expected thing and run for a second term. To kind of be a different kind of figure. Jimmy Carter converted the post-presidency, redesigned the idea of an ex-President. Solving diseases and bad elections around the world. Bill Clinton with the Clinton Global Initiative trying to do the same thing. So I’m not putting any credence in this column. I think we have to assume, because he’s a politician and he’s an incumbent President, he is running for re-election.

See the original post:
On Letterman, Brian Williams Cheers ‘Fruits’ of ‘Clinton Economy’ and Ridicules Tea Party

FOX News Won’t Give Event Coverage To Beck’s 8/28 Rally

On his August 17th radio broadcast, Glenn Beck confirmed that his 8/28 rally will not be given event coverage on FOX News. Instead, he said he was told, he will receive “news segments.” Beck quickly claimed that he didn't know why the decision was made, but the rushed, resentful tone of voice suggested that whatever he had been told he did not like. added by: toyotabedzrock

Why did the Israeli Jews blow up the twin towers? For Money.

! Half the world believes the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by Israeli and American Jews and their accomplices. added by: trut

Buffalino: Squeezing A Lot Into A Tiny RV

Many people around the world are experimenting with living in smaller spaces; some are living in recreational vehicles, but they tend to be larger and consume a lot of gas. German designer Cornelius Comanns has converted a Piaggio APE 50 three-wheeled delivery vehicle, a cheap and fuel efficient platform…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

Excerpt from:
Buffalino: Squeezing A Lot Into A Tiny RV

Spencer Sex Tape Better than Girl-On-Girl

Filed under: Heidi Montag , Spencer Pratt , Karissa Shannon , Kristina Shannon , Vivid Entertainment The Heidi Montag sex tape saga has exposed a glaring hypocrisy in the world of celebrity sex tapes — straight sex trumps beautiful, innocent, glorious girl-on-girl action. Sources close to the Heidi sex tape deal tell TMZ … Vivid Entertainment is only… Read more

More here:
Spencer Sex Tape Better than Girl-On-Girl

Mind Control by your Gov.

brainwash americans and most of the world. added by: unclepete813

Ashley Tisdale Hides her Ugly Face of the Day

If you read the site, you will know that after seeing Ashley Tisdale smiling at last year’s teen choice awards, for winning best female performer, or something equally paid off for and stupid sounding, I felt a need to prove the world that she’s not the best at anything, and put her in her ugly girl place, cuz there’s one thing I hate in the world, and that’s ugly chicks who think they are hot… So we’ve established in our “Ugly Watch” that she’s got a busted up face, despite the plastic surgery, she looks seriously inbred….I know we’ve succeeded cuz she’s covering the fuck up now, so no one can be tainted by her disgustingness and so everyone can focus on her body, something she works really hard to maintain, but despite all her efforts leaves her with a boring looking ass… I won’t be happy til Tisdale is too scared to leave her house. So the ugly watch continues….

The rest is here:
Ashley Tisdale Hides her Ugly Face of the Day