Tag Archives: america

MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Froths: Wall Street Frightens ‘Little Boy’ Obama, Makes Him ‘Bend Over’

MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan appeared on Morning Joe, Wednesday, to dismiss Barack Obama as a “little boy” in the eyes of Wall Street and to assert the President “just bends over,” rather than stand up to the financial industry. The charged language surprised host Joe Scarborough who sputtered, “You know, I was so uncomfortable with a couple of the things you said and then the exclamation point at the end.” Speaking of financial reform, Ratigan attacked, “…When the Wall Street guys got across the table from him and said ‘Oh you going to change our tax code little boy ?'” After dismissing Obama’s ability to oppose Wall Street, Ratigan vulgarly claimed, ” But with this guy, he just bends over every time.” After Scarborough and co-host Mika Brzezinski expressed their amazement over the comments, Ratigan first asserted, “I’m not trying to offend.” He then quickly changed course and opined, “I am trying to offend, because I am offended. And everybody in America is offended and they are right to be offended.” Ratigan isn’t the first MSNBC and Morning Joe regular to make highly questionable comments. On February 23, 2010 , Donny Deutsch appeared on another program, the Joy Behar Show, and referred to Republican Marco Rubio as a “coconut.” (Coconut is a racist term for Hispanics who are brown on the outside and white on the inside.) Deutsch later apologized . Considering that many liberal journalists have jumped on any criticism of Obama as proof of racism, it will be interesting to see how Ratigan’s comments are received. A transcript of the July 14 segment, which aired at 7:11am EDT, follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: When do we start cutting back? DYLAN RATIGAN: We start cutting after we start clawing back. I don’t know why, as country, we refuse to deal with the issue of compensation that is being paid out to individuals who are taking that money predicated on their control of the government and not on their introduction of any value. 75 percent of what happens in the financial industry is a racket. It should be basically outlawed so that we can restore capitalism. And why we don’t deal with tax dodge that exists at the top. Again, Barack Obama, very aggressive in his campaign trail about [starts doing an Obama impression] how he was going to take care of the private equity tax loophole and work for the American people. It’s not a very good Barack Obama. Maybe that was- JOHN HEILMANN: Sounds more like a Texas Congressman. RATIGAN: And he didn’t do it, when it came down to it, when the Wall Street guys got across the table from him and said “Oh you going to change our tax code little boy? ” I think not. Because I’ll tell you right now, when you’re a 75 yr old or an 80 year old billionaire from New York who is looking at any government in this country that’s trying to play with the tax code- Who know who wins, the 80 year old billionaire from New York every time. If its Teddy Roosevelt in office who is not intimated by these types of people he might say “Listen. I don’t care who you are, I don’t care how rich you are, its not going to happen.” But with this guy, he just bends over every time. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Dylan, you’re very- Oh, my God! SCARBOROUGH: You know, I was so uncomfortable with a couple of the things you said and then the exclamation point at the end. RATIGAN: It’s unbelievable to me. I’m not trying to offend. SCARBOROUGH: Well- RATIGAN: No, no. They want to cut teachers and cops, okay?. You want to cut teachers and police in California, in Massachusetts and Ohio, but you don’t want to restore any fairness to the tax code or eliminate the theft, let alone the extraction? We go to BP, health care, etc. SCARBOROUGH: You don’t actually try to offend. RATIGAN: I am trying to offend, because I am offended. And everybody in America is offended and they are right to be offended.

Read the original post:
MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Froths: Wall Street Frightens ‘Little Boy’ Obama, Makes Him ‘Bend Over’

America’s Got Talent Season 5 Episode 13 – Hollywood Part 1

Watch America’s Got Talent S5E13: Hollywood Part 1 1st 12 of Top 48 Performs The new installment of America’s Got Talent which is entitled “Hollywood Part 1” is the TV show’s 13th episode of the 5th season that aired last 07/13/2010, Tuesday at 8:00 pm on NBC. Watch America’s Got Talent 5×13(05013) Free Online Streaming Full Episodes Replay of the Latest Season and Video Clip Download Link: HERE

Read the original post:
America’s Got Talent Season 5 Episode 13 – Hollywood Part 1

GORDON DUFF: CLASSIFIED CIA TRANSCRIPT COUNTERS BIN LADEN TERROR ROLE : Veterans Today

DOUBT THROWN ON PROOF BIN LADEN A TERRORIST LEADER By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor Two weeks ago, CIA Director Leon Panetta told the press the CIA had not been able to positively confirm any specific information on Osama bin Laden since “late 2000.” Interviews with high ranking military and intelligence officials, some at the highest levels, have confirmed that all evidence lends toward Osama bin Laden’s death in December 2001. Yet transcripts of translated audio and video tapes, albeit widely disputed, are continually released by a news agency tied to Israeli intelligence services. The transcripts of the last proven bin Laden interview, translated by the CIA, are compared to similar translations of a 2007 “broadcast” said to be by Osama bin Laden. Both are excerpted for length but not content. Striking differences between the two “bin Ladens” is obvious. In 2007, in a lengthy admonition, no mention of Israel is made whatsoever, nor of Palestine. In fact, the bin Laden of 2007 seems to be totally oblivious of Israel. We will begin with the CIA document, one that directly disputes claims made by the media for years. We thank the Central Intelligence Agency for making this document available. With dozens of films, videos and recordings, all claiming Osama bin Laden has taken credit for 9/11 and other terrorist attacks against America, Britain, Spain and other nations, the possession of the only official translation of the real Osama bin Laden is vital. What you are going to be reading is both astounding and frightening. More at the link: added by: Monkey_Films

Hours After Fireworks, Pacifica Aired Michael Moore Saying Americans Will Be Rejected from Heaven

Pacifica Radio, funded in part by federal grants from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, has a habit of ruining the patriotic holidays with their programming. On Memorial Day, their show “Democracy Now” hosted radical leftist Noam Chomsky railing against the “grand criminal” Ronald Reagan . On July 5, while many were still warmly recalling the Independence Day fireworks displays, “Democracy Now” aired a special interview with leftist filmmaker Michael Moore , who concluded by suggesting taxpaying Americans (even anti-war taxpaying Americans) aren’t getting into Heaven due to their government’s warmongering. Moore said he would tell President Obama to withdraw all U.S. troops now from Iraq and Afghanistan, because the wars there were immoral: I just wonder sometimes, who do we think we are as Americans, that we’re not going to have to answer for this someday? You know, whether we answer for it here or there, or if you’re a religious person and you think there’s a life after this, you know, what do you think is going to happen up at the Pearly Gates when they check your citizenship and go, “Oh, you were an American? Ha, well, here’s your list of crimes”? “Oh, yeah. No, I was against the war! I was against the war!” “Did you pay your taxes?” “Well, yeah, you got to pay your taxes.” “Well, then you helped fund this, didn’t you?” “Oh, yeah.” “OK, well, you know, turn around. You’re not coming in the Gates. ” I just—I think that there’s so much good that we could do. You know, if you travel the world, you know that people like us as people, as individuals. There’s something charming about our naïveté and our, you know, right? I mean, you know, “Hey! Hey! How ya doin’! Hey, yeah! I’m from Detroit! Yeah!” They could spot us coming. But I think we’re capable of a lot of good. And when you have a billion people on this planet that tonight cannot drink a cup of clean water, two billion who don’t have clean sanitation, what if we used our money to do that? I read this crazy statistic—and I have not fact-checked this, I’ll just throw this out there—but it was something like, for $15 billion or something like that, we could dig so many—x number of wells in the third world that would greatly reduce that number of how many people don’t have clean water. And I’m thinking, $15 billion is what we’ve been spending almost most every month on Iraq and Afghanistan. So, one month of the killing machine could give clean water to virtually all the people that don’t have it? Wouldn’t you rather be known as, you know, a citizen of a country that a child 10,000 miles away, while growing up, drinking clean water, saw that plaque on that well that said, “Brought to you from your friends in the United States of America”? That’s how I’d like to be known. Earlier in the show, Moore thanked the nuns who foiled his school newspaper career since he wrote the Catholic Church was a “woman-hating institution.” He said he showed his film “Sicko” to elderly nuns in Michigan and “nuns are great, because they know the [bleep] that goes on in the Catholic Church, and they were always more radical and more antiwar and all that, because obviously they were suffering their own oppression being nuns and just taking it out on the rest of us.”

More:
Hours After Fireworks, Pacifica Aired Michael Moore Saying Americans Will Be Rejected from Heaven

Newsweek Shocker: ‘The Environment is No Longer a Surefire Political Winner’

After pushing manmade global warming for years, the folks at Newsweek appear to be cooling on the idea. Prominently placed at the front page of the magazine’s website Monday was a large, overhead picture of what appeared to be a golf fairway or park with the following headline in green: A Green Retreat: Why the Environment is No Longer a Surefire Political Winner Even more surprising was the contents (h/t Climate Depot ): Following two of the harshest winters on record in the Northern Hemisphere-not to mention an epic economic crisis-voters no longer consider global warming a priority. Just 42 percent of Germans now worry about climate change, down from 62 percent in 2006. In Australia, only 53 percent still consider it a pressing issue, down from 75 percent in 2007. Americans rank climate change dead last of 21 problems that concern them most, according to a January Pew poll. Last month Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper, blasting climate change as a “sideshow” to global economic issues, canceled the meeting of environment ministers that has preceded the G8 or G20 summit every year but one since 1994. Merkel has slashed green-development aid in the latest round of budget cuts, while in Washington, Barack Obama seems to have cooled on his plan to cap emissions. In perhaps the most striking momentum reversal for environmental politicians, last month Rudd became the first leader to be destroyed by his green policies. Flip-flopping over planned emissions cuts as the opposition exploited Australian voters’ flagging support for climate measures, he was finally ousted by party rebels.  After discussing some of the politics involved at local levels around the globe, author Stefan Theil started pointing out the really inconvenient truths Nobel Laureate Al Gore has hidden from his followers:  Increasingly, the whole concept of radical, top-down global targets is coming under scrutiny as citizens and governments face tougher choices over costs and benefits. Green policies can be popular when they mean subsidizing renewable fuels or going after unpopular power companies, but can quickly hit a wall when they force lifestyle change, such as less driving and fewer swimming pools-fears Rudd’s opponents have exploited. Policies that push trendy green fuels also cost much more than other options, such as replacing dirty coal with cleaner gas or emissions-free nuclear power. Some schemes, such as America’s corn ethanol and Europe’s biodiesel made from rapeseed, have virtually zero net emissions savings, but any petroleum they displace is quickly bought up by China. Even in the ideal case that the United Nations’ goal of 80 percent emissions reduction by 2050 is technologically and politically feasible, economists disagree widely on whether the cost of the current set of policies, such as carbon caps and green-fuel subsidies, is justified by the avoided damage from warmer temperatures.  But here’s what should really grab the attention of those that either believe this myth or are still on the fence: In many ways, green projects have become just another flavor of grubby interest politics. Biofuels have become a new label for old-style agricultural subsidies that funnel some $20 billion annually to landowners with little effect on emissions (only Brazilian sugar-cane ethanol produces any significant savings; America’s corn ethanol and Europe’s biodiesel do not). Germany’s solar subsidies, a signature project in the country’s battle against climate change, are perhaps the most wasteful green scheme on earth, producing a mere 0.25 percent of the country’s energy at a cost to consumers of as much as $125 billion. A leading member of Merkel’s Christian Democrats in the German Parliament says there is growing unease both in his party and in the Bundestag “about the scary monster we’ve created that is sucking up ever larger amounts of money for a negligible effect.” With green politics losing its moral high ground, there is a growing realization that climate change is just one policy priority among many that compete for limited resources and attention. That means, first, that climate politics will likely fall off its pedestal of being the Western world’s overarching priority. Second, the new sobriety could give more space to a third stream of climate politics between those who see warming as an unmitigated catastrophe that must be stopped at any cost, and those who reject global warming as a hoax. A new climate realism would more carefully weigh the costs and benefits of emissions controls, and look at other options beyond the current set of targets. The new debate will be more pragmatic and include a broader mix of policies. That might include a shift of subsidies into research and development, as many climate economists have argued. It would also include greater efforts to adapt society to a warmer climate, rather than focusing only on stopping the warming process in its tracks. Those that have been following this debate from a grander perspective than what is typically presented by global warming-obsessed media know that climate realists have been saying this for years. Sociologists and economists from around the world have argued that moneys currently being devoted to try to “stop this problem” could be far better spent in ways that would more greatly impact citizens on every continent.  But as Theil pointed out: That idea has so far figured little in the debate, largely because mainstream environmentalists fear it will distract from their push for CO2 cutbacks. Yet adaptation may offer equally valid and much less expensive choices than cutting back on emissions. Imagine that: man could adapt to a changing environment more cheaply than trying — likely with little to no success! — to prevent the change: In other words, some of the money spent on current policies that often have only limited efficacy might be better spent on other measures, including protection against the worst effects of warming. What’s more, current economic worries are a reminder that every dollar spent on solar cells or biodiesel is a dollar less for education and other budget priorities. Truly shocking stuff, especially from a magazine that as Tom Nelson points out published a cover story almost exactly three years ago entitled “Global Warming Deniers: A Well-funded Machine.” So why the change of heart? Was it evidence that the weather really isn’t cooperating with the desires and computer model-driven predictions of the alarmists? Did last year’s ClimateGate scandal, despite the relative lack of press it got here in the states, open up some eyes as to the modus operandi and the deviousness of those spreading the myth? Did revelations concerning misreporting and truly bad science employed by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change contributors weaken the resolve of believers? Or was it all the controversy surrounding the Green Messiah Al Gore’s new home purchase in Montecito quickly followed by a separation from his wife and allegations of a four-year-old sex scandal? Or is it merely a consequence of a struggling economy and a federal government trying to figure out ways to finance all its current commitments without the additional burden of environmental spending? Whatever the reason or combination thereof, Americans should hope that this isn’t just a brief moment of sanity, and that Newsweek isn’t going to quickly reverse course once someone wakes up Monday morning and realizes what’s been so prominently placed at the front page of its website. 

Read the original here:
Newsweek Shocker: ‘The Environment is No Longer a Surefire Political Winner’

Olbermann Claimed He’d Never Call a Woman ‘Idiot,’ But Tags Palin ‘Idiot’ 22 Times

Since April 8 of this year, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann has called former Governor Sarah Palin an “idiot” 22 times on his Countdown show, usually by uttering the words, “That woman is an idiot.” But in August 2004, the MSNBC host claimed to be too “naive and old-fashioned” to call a woman an “idiot,” as he attacked conservative commentator Michelle Malkin for misquoting him as having called her an “idiot,” when, in reality, he had charged that she had “made a fool out of herself” instead. In fact, Olbermann contended that if he had in reality called her an “idiot,” it would have been grounds for him to apologize: We at Countdown were preparing an apology for my choice of language last night after the writer Michelle Malkin went on Rush Limbaugh’s radio entertainment program and wrote in her Web blog that I had called her a, quote, “idiot.” It was Ms. Malkin, who on Hardball last night, raised the accusation that John Kerry’s Vietnam wounds may have been self-inflicted. It’s naive and old-fashioned, but I feel you should reserve those terms like “idiot” exclusively for men. Political differences, fault or innocence are all secondary. There are codes. There’s also a problem. I never called her an idiot. But since April, the words, “That woman is an idiot,” referring to Palin, have become a near regular part of the show, as the Countdown host has ascribed the term to the former governor during 20 episodes of his show between April 8 and July 8, including once when he used the label three times in one show as he also called her “idiot woman” and “that idiot.” Over the last couple of years, Olbermann has a history of making even more incendiary attacks on Malkin and Palin, once comparing Malkin to a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it,” and once crudely joking with Rachel Maddow about the difference between Palin and a pitbull being that “you can train a pitbull to occasionally keep its mouth closed.” Last February, he slammed Sarah Palin, former New York Lieutenant Governor Betsy McCaughey, and other ObamaCare critics, especially those who have used the term “death panels,” calling such national health care opponents by the names “subhumans,” “ghouls,” and “fiends.” He went on to “damn” to “hell” those who use the term “death panels.” Olbermann: “It’s a life panel, and damn those who call it otherwise to hell!” Below are transcripts of the times Olbermann has called former Governor Palin an “idiot” since April 8, in reverse chronological order, followed by the times from August 2004 when he called Malkin a “fool,” and then claimed that calling a woman an “idiot” would be beneath him: #From July 8: KEITH OLBERMANN: Videotapes from Osama bin Laden grew irrelevant when it became clear what they were – without exception, rather loud, angry incoherent and boring. And in our fourth story tonight: Joining the ranks in both form and relevance are the videotapes from half Governor Sarah Palin. Her latest scoring the highest on that last coincidence: boring. The video produced by Palin`s political action committee, Sarah PAC, and features images of women at Tea Party rallies holding signs like, “Don`t Tread on Me.” There are also plenty of shots of Palin at various events and voiceovers all Palin taken primarily from the speech she gave before the anti-choice Susan B. Anthony List. The nearly two-minute video is entitled, “Mama Grizzlies.” Here is part of it. SARAH PALIN: All across this country, women are standing up and speaking out for common sense solutions. These policies coming out of D.C. right now, this fundamental transformation of America, well, a lot of women who are very concerned about their kids` futures, saying, “We don`t like this fundamental transformation, and we`re going to do something about it.” It seems like it`s kind of a mom awakening in the last year and a half where women are rising up and saying, no, we`ve had enough already, because moms kind of just know when something`s wrong. There in Alaska I always think of the mama grizzly bears that rise up on their hind legs when somebody`s coming to attack their cubs, to do something adverse toward their cubs. You thought, pit bulls were tough, well, you don`t want to mess with the mama grizzlies. OLBERMANN: Mama grizzlies eat their own young. That woman is an idiot. #From July 7: KEITH OLBERMANN: When it comes to lies about health care reform, half Governor Sarah Palin can`t top her death panel stinker. But she has managed to smear a key Obama appointment with something similar, that he`s bent on rationing health care based on quality of life. And in our fourth story, if the GOP were not bent on drawing political blood, it might find out that the new head of Medicare and Medicaid is actually a choice they should like, just as he is liked by a man Bush 43 appointed to the same job. President Obama made a recess appointment today of Dr. Donald Berwick to serve as administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CMS has not had a confirmed administrator since 2006. White House communications director, Dan Pfeiffer, explained the recess appointment, quoting, “Many Republicans in Congress have made it clear in recent weeks that they were going to stall the nomination as long as they could solely to score political points.” Last night, a Republican not in Congress or employed, Sarah Palin, offered this Tweet of hyperbole: “Press corps, please do your job as Obama sneaks in Berwick appointmentt, please cover his mission, socialized health care and rationing based on quality of life.” I thought Americans were supposed to ignore the press corps? That woman is an idiot. That left Senate Minority Leader McConnell to lead the chorus of Republican officeholders, quoting, “Apparently, the Obama administration intends to arrogantly circumvent the American people yet again by recess appointing one of the most prominent advocates of rationed health care to implement their national plan.” The supposedly grievous intentions of Dr. Berwick deriving from this comment, quote, “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care, the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open. And right now, we are doing it blindly.” But, as health care experts know, that was a statement of fact about an already broken health care system. And who echoed Dr. Berwick? Quoting, “Rationing happens today. The question is who will do it?” Is that President Obama? House Speaker “Evil” Pelosi? No. Republican Congressman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin. But the CMS director under President Bush, Tom Scully, said this about Dr. Berwick, quote, “He`s universally regarded and a thoughtful guy who is not partisan. I think it`s more about the health care bill. You could nominate Gandhi to be the head of CMS and that would be controversial right now.” #From July 1: KEITH OLBERMANN: Our runner-up, Sister Sarah, speaking at the International Bowl Expo in Vegas. According to the online Bowling Examiner, quote, “Palin recalled her youth when her father set pins in Idaho. (OLBERMANN IMITATES PALIN’S VOICE) ‘My dad was on a Thursday night bowling league,’ she said. ‘He bonded with his buddies. I have memories of that point of my life which mean very, very much to me.’” When her family moved out of Idaho, she was three-months-old. She can`t even get through a damn bowling convention without lying? That woman is an idiot! #From June 28: KEITH OLBERMANN: But our winner, yes, Sister Sarah. You`ve by now heard about the gaffe fest that was her speech at Cal State Stanislaus on Saturday. She said, perhaps, 100 things that brand her as a phony. But none is more symbolic of her imbecility, her corner-cutting, her downright endorsement of stupidity instead of intelligence, than this one. SARAH PALIN: -because this is Reagan country. Yeah! And perhaps it was destiny that the man who went to California`s Eureka College would become so woven within and interlinked to the Golden State. OLBERMANN: Eureka College is in Eureka, Illinois. Illinois, where Ronald Reagan was from. There is a town of Eureka in California, but it doesn`t have a college. And Palin went to three different colleges but doesn`t have an education. (OLBERMANN IMITATES REAGAN’S VOICE) Well, that woman is an idiot . The half governor of Alaska, today`s “Worst Person” – there you go again – “in the World.” #From June 21: KEITH OLBERMANN: First, no, this is not your water coming to a boil, it`s our nightly checkup on the something for nothing crowd, it is “Tea Time.” And we go back to the citizen zero of the plague, Sister Sarah herself. She has a solution for the Gulf. Pray, baby, pray. “Gulf disaster needs divine intervention as man`s efforts have been futile. Gulf lawmakers designate today day of prayer for solution/miracle.” Well, there you have it, a Palin presidency preview in microcosm. Oh, crap. Something bad happened, don`t worry, God will fix it. A quick miracle and presto change-o the oil stops. We should even have a “Department of Homeland Miracles” also. If you want to point to the success of prayer in your own life, I`m not going to argue with you, and I think I could offer my own examples. But I think even Billy Graham would admit that relying on honest to goodness structural miracles, fires stopping themselves, buildings falling up, 100,000 barrel a day oil cataclysm sealing themselves, that`s pretty poor public policy. But who am I to criticize Mrs. Palin? I mean, I learned the other day that I have no political disagreements with her, no questions of right or wrong, people versus corporations, intelligence or idiocy because as an AWR Hawkins writes at the Web site Human Events, “Liberals hate Palin because she`s beautiful.” “They despise her,” he writes, “beauty. It pushes them over to the edge to know that she doesn`t just shoot an assault rifle but makes an assault rifle look good when shooting it.” Uh-oh, even Rich Lowry can see where this one is going. “This was obvious when she was running for Vice President on the McCain ticket and it became known that she`d taken part in beauty pageants to get money to pay college tuition. How dare her that she is not only beautiful, but she used that beauty for profit.” Oh, no, Mr. AWR Hawkins, you didn`t just write “she used that beauty for profit,” did you? “So when a Keith Olbermann-type moron refers to Palin as an “idiot” again, or a Chris Matthews-type repeats his belief that she`s “frightening,” we just need to remember that the left criticizes that which they fear. We also have to keep in mind that the fact that all the names they throw at Palin are really code words for `Dang, that woman looks good.`” How can I be both honest and gentlemanly about this? Okay. Code words: No, no, they`re not. When I say that woman is an idiot, I mean, that woman is an idiot. I`ll leave out the gratuitous shots Mr. Hawkins then takes at Hillary Clinton and Eleanor Roosevelt. But I did want to circle back to the headline. “Liberals hate Palin because she`s beautiful.” I wonder if Mr. Hawkins understands the admission contained in his dubious premise. It is, in short, the climax of Mr. Lowry`s fevered review of Mrs. Palin`s performance at the vice presidential debate, and he wrote about her, watching her winking, winking at him, winking only at him. To wit, this is how the right wants us to pick our leaders. This is their criteria for our women leaders? I think I might prefer Mrs. Palin’s idea. Start praying for divine intervention because man’s efforts to find intelligence among conservatives has been futile. #From June 16: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: And the comic relief: Sister Sarah suggests getting a little Dutch boy to put his finger in the oil leak? SARAH PALIN: The Dutch. They are known – and the Norwegian – they are known for, for dikes and for cleaning up water and for dealing with spills. They offered to help. OLBERMANN: That woman is an idiot. #From June 2: KEITH OLBERMANN: First, a “Quick Comment” on the politician whose career ended the moment B.P. ignored the warnings aboard the doomed Deepwater Horizon. Thank goodness we still have Sarah Palin. We revert to Twitter, it may only be 140 characters per message, but the gifted queen of “Sarah-noia” can still rewrite history, even with such circumscription. “Extreme greenies, see now why we push ‘Drill, baby, drill’ of known reserves and promising finds in safe onshore places like ANWR? Now do you get it?” Yes, we get it. You`re lying again. The message of the farce that substituted for the 2008 Republican ticket said nothing about safe onshore places like ANWR. It was just “Drill, baby, drill.” Not only that, but when President Obama mistakenly increased offshore drilling two months ago, there were no qualifiers about safe onshore places from his critics. The half-governor attacked the President thusly. “While Interior Department bureaucrats continue to hold up actually offshore drilling from taking place, Russia is moving full steam ahead on Arctic drilling and China, Russia and Venezuela are buying leases off the coast of Cuba.” That woman is an idiot. Ms. Palin can try to back fill all she wants, but she will never retroactively attach the caveat of safe onshore places. The phrase is hers, she owns it. It may well turn out to be her epitaph that mindless, deliberately double-entendred, three-word policy statement/bad porn movie title, “Drill, baby, drill.” #From June 1: KEITH OLBERMANN: Sarah Palin`s response to all this has been to drill more, especially in wildlife reserves, onshore, because them is safer. Her neighbor Joe McGinniss answers her equally wacky response to his arrival in town and she shows up in the Twitter report, next. OLBERMANN: Just who was spying on whom in Alaska? McGinniss v. Palin, next. First, the Twitter report and quelle coincidence, our Tweet of the day from Sarah Palin USA. And for some reason, she scrubbed this soon after posting it. “Governor Jindal, to avoid ravished coast, build the berms, ask forgiveness, later. Feds are slow to act. The local leadership in action can do more for the coast.” Ravished? Ravaged, maybe? Even on Twitter, that woman is an idiot. #From May 19: KEITH OLBERMANN: But first tonight`s “Worst Persons in the World.” The bronze to Little Miss Bendy Straws, appearing on Fixed News a little after 9:00 p.m. Eastern last night to discuss the special election in the Pennsylvania 12th, where the aide to the late Jack Murtha, Mark Critz, faced Republican Tim Burns for a seat in Congress right now. Her enabler, Mr. Hannity, said, (IMITATES HANNITY’S VOICE) “If Burns pulls this off tonight, what would that say to you?” And she replied, in her usual inimitable gibberish, (IMITATES PALIN’S VOICE) “I think Burns will pull this off tonight. And just like the ‘Randslide’ that we were just talking about, you`re going to see Burns having this representation of a smaller, smarter government, getting the economy back on the right track with some limited overreach of the government. That`s what Burns stands for. We need someone like Tim Burns in there. And you`re going to see that via vote today with the electorate.” Critz 53 percent, Burns 44 percent, a Critz-slide. That woman is an idiot. #From May 17: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: And little “Miss Bendy Straws” endorses racial profiling and hatred. SARAH PALIN: It`s time for Americans across this great country to stand up and say, “We`re all Arizonans now.” OLBERMANN: No, actually, Arizona says it`s time for Americans in this great country to stand up and say: “No, really, we`re Americans. We have papers.” That woman is an idiot. #From May 14: KEITH OLBERMANN: Former half Governor Sarah Palin had a busy day today, and experienced criticism. In our third story, she said she misses President George W. Bush. In the next breath, she bemoaned bailouts, including the one that President Bush engineered on his way out of office. And Palin said that if President Obama had his way, he would gut the Second Amendment. First, her speech before an anti-abortion group, she called the President, quote, “the most pro-abortion President ever to occupy the White House,” and also spoke of her own decision to have a baby with Down’s Syndrome, her daughter`s decision in the face of an unplanned pregnancy. Her first statement about her daughter`s pregnancy during the presidential campaign included the quote, “We`re proud of Bristol`s decision to have her baby.” Palin still doesn`t address the fact that the decision implies choice, which she, if she had her way, would deny women who face an unwanted pregnancy. But on the topic of George W. Bush good, bailouts bad, Palin really hit her stride. SARAH PALIN CLIP #1: Oh, of course, I always like seeing though, too, the sign of the billboard, George Bush saying, “Miss me yet?” I love that one. PALIN CLIP #2: We do. Because when Washington goes on a spending spree and starts borrowing money to take over and bail out insurance companies and financial institutions and the banks, the automakers, and keeps spending endlessly, and running up dangerously unsustainable debt and deficits, and expect that our kids and our grand kids are going to pay the bills for us, for our overspending today, I think that`s immoral, it`s unethical, it`s not right, and I think that all of us agree on that. OLBERMANN: Of course, the bank and financial institution part of that bailout litany kind of thing was heartily pushed by President Bush and Vice President Cheney, who were willing to try anything to keep an all out Depression from happening during their watch. As for deficits, Palin did not mention Bush`s two wars, massive tax cuts for the rich, even the Medicare prescription drug program. At her second event today, the National Rifle Association, she attacked President Obama on the Second Amendment, even though Obama as a candidate had spoken favorably of a Supreme Court decision that said Washington`s ban on handguns had gone too far. And as President, Obama signed legislation which expanded gun rights, including the law permitting gun owners to carry concealed weapons in national parks. PALIN: President Obama and his allies, like Nancy Pelosi, have been relatively quiet on the gun control front. Not because they don`t want to limit your rights, but because they`re afraid of the political consequences. Don`t doubt for a minute that if they thought they could get away with it, they would ban guns and ban ammunition and gut the Second Amendment. OLBERMANN: That woman is an idiot. #From May 13: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER, WITH WORDS “DOUBLE DOG DARE YA SARAH” ON SCREEN: And idiot woman speaks in front of a big flag sponsored by a sump pump company, quote, “Somebody told me, ‘You know you`re going into enemy territory.’ I said, ‘It`s Chicago, it’s not MSNBC.’” Yeah, like you had the courage to come to MSNBC. … OLBERMANN: But our winner, Sister Sarah. The maestro of the bendy straw spoke to a crowd of 4,000 in Rosemont, Illinois, outside Chicago. SARAH PALIN: A gal walked up and asked him where he was from. And he said Alaska. And then, all of a sudden, the clerk turns beet red and the veins pop out of her neck, kind of like how Rachel Maddow does sometimes. Now watch, that clip`s going to be on air for her dot com, increase her ratings. OLBERMANN, IMITATING PALIN’S VOICE: “For her dot com.” It`s pronounced Maddow, Ms. Paline. She continued, “I`m glad to be here on the President`s home turf. Somebody told me, ‘You know you`re going into enemy territory.’ I said, ‘It`s Chicago, it`s not MSNBC.’” That woman is an idiot. And the event at which that idiot spoke was sponsored by an Illinois firm that specializes in battery-operated backup sump pumps. So it`s not just a sump pump political event, it was a backup sump pump political event. Moreover, to put it plainly, and this is a matter of record, that woman does not have the courage – personal or political – to appear on MSNBC, not without an army with her. I mean that literally. The half governor of Alaska, now celebrating two years without holding an actual news conference, nor having the guts to be interviewed on a network like this one, but the toast of America`s backup sump pump political circuit, today`s “Worst Person in the World.” #From April 30: KEITH OLBERMANN: President Obama putting a hold on his new offshore drilling policy until the investigation of this oil spill is complete. Mr. Obama is saying he is still committed to drilling here in the U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I continue to believe that domestic oil production is an important part of our overall strategy for energy security. But I`ve always said it must be done responsibly for the safety of our workers and our environment. The local economies and livelihoods of the people of the Gulf Coast, as well as the ecology of the region, are at stake. OLBERMANN: One half of the ticket which ran against Obama during the 2008 presidential election using the slogan “Drill, baby, drill,” taking to her Twitter page, to say in multiple tweets, “Having worked/lived through Exxon oil spill, my family and I understand Gulf residents` fears. Our prayers are with you. All industry efforts must be employed.” And later, “Domestic drilling: why we can still believe,” linking through to her Facebook page, wherein the human oil slick writes in part, “No human endeavor is ever without risk – whether it`s sending a man to the moon or extracting the necessary resources to fuel our civilization. I repeat the slogan, ‘Drill here, drill now,’ not out of naivete or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills, I continue to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous and peaceful nation.” That woman`s ghost Tweeter is an idiot. #From April 29: KEITH OLBERMANN: Earlier this month, Sarah Palin told Republicans in New Orleans, no more study is needed to drill for new oil in the Gulf. SARAH PALIN CLIP #1: We can produce it safely and responsibly. We don`t need more studies, we need more action. PALIN CLIP #2: -because energy produced in America is security for America. And it is jobs for American workers, jobs that can`t be outsourced. Let`s drill, baby drill, not stall, baby, stall. OLBERMANN: That woman is an idiot. #From April 28: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: Which of these stories will you be talking about tomorrow? Rebellion in “Arizona-stan.” The sheriff of Pima County, from Tucson, at the Mexican border, says he has no intention of enforcing the new “show me your papers” law. Clarence Dupnik calls it “unnecessary,” “racist,” “disgusting.” Sheriff Dupnik joins us. Yet others demand more. “We want the National Guard on the border,” says Republican Congressman Poe of Texas. Republican Congressman Hunter, the younger, of California, wants deportation of children born here to undocumented immigrants because the kids` souls are not American enough. REP. DUNCAN HUNTER (R-CA): It takes more than walking across the border to become an American citizen. It`s what`s in our souls. OLBERMANN: It sure is. And the half governor as usual sees a plot. SARAH PALIN: I think that President Obama is playing to his base on this one, and I think that`s quite unfortunate. OLBERMANN: That woman is an idiot. #From April 16: KEITH OLBERMANN: Two years ago today, then-Governor Sarah Palin urged Alaskans to sign advanced health care declarations. Last summer when a provision in the health care bill would have helped people get the facts from their doctors about such decisions and coverage from their insurers about such meetings, Palin irresponsibly dubbed it Obama’s death panel. In our third story on the Countdown, today is national health care decisions day, and President Obama has now made it easier for gay men and lesbians and others who want to designate as legal surrogates people who are not conventional family members. The President first, he has directed his Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius to issue new rules requiring most hospitals to extend visitation rights for the partners of gay men and lesbians and to respect a patient’s choice about who he or she designates to make critical health care decisions for them. The new rules would also apply to widows and widowers, and members of some religious orders who choose a friend or a companion for visitation or as a legal surrogate. It was just two years ago that Governor Palin marked this day by encouraging people in her state to create their own advanced directives. But it was former half governor, former presidential candidate Palin who posted on her Facebook page last August quoting, “The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down’s Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama`s death panel so his bureaucrats can decide based on a subjective judgment of their level of productivity and society, whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.” Of course, she was right, the America I know and love is not one in which that would happen. Palin even reveled later in broadening that claim. SARAH PALIN: We`re not going to back off on our criticism of the problems of the health care bill, and one aspect of it is the death panels still. If we have our health care paid for by the bureaucracy by the government, we`re going to be subject to bureaucrats deciding which – panels and commissions deciding, just like they do overseas, who will be worthy of receiving the health care that government is going to provide. So that is the death panel that I referred to, and I won`t back off on criticizing that aspect of the health care bill. OLBERMANN: This woman is an idiot. #From April 14: KEITH OLBERMANN: Good evening from New York. We begin tonight in unprecedented fashion. Liberals, progressives, Democrats, our top story tonight is not really for you, though you are encouraged to rubber neck at the train wreck. Tonight, our fifth story is a genuine and sincerely genuine attempt to help Tea Party members around the country. Politico, a mainstream political news Web site, today publishing a secret document it obtained establishing definitively that some of the nation`s top Tea Party leaders are using you, using you to line their own pockets and propagate the precise establishment politics that you hate so much. Here it is. And the reporter who got it is standing by to talk with us. It was written just days after last year`s Tax Day Tea parties proposing the creation of the Tea Party Express, the group that launched 1,000 bus tours. The express charter was not written by a Tea Party leader, nor even by a grassroots independent, but by a Republican operative telling Politico the Tea Party Express could, quote, “give a boost to his consulting firm`s PAC,” political action committee, “and position us as a growing force.” The charter is worth quoting at length, bringing established Tea Party leaders unto the express, quote, “will be a very, sensitive matter. We have to be very careful about discussing amongst ourselves anyone we include outside of the family, because, quite frankly, we are not only not part of the political establishment of conservative establishment, but we are also sadly not currently part of the Tea Party establishment – i.e., Michelle Malkin, Eric Odom, Smart Girl Politics, TCOP, FreedomWorks, Newt Gingrich, etc. We can probably pull off a phenomenally successful tour without these big-ego establishment types.” The document also talks about how to appear authentic. “We`ve already discussed doing a casting call among our Nevada supports and donors to appear in at least one of our TV ads targeting Harry Reid to buttress our ‘authenticity,’” their quote marks, “in running ads in the state.” One goal, electing Republicans, quote, “It is also worth considering making a return run to Michigan. Former Republican Michigan Governor John Engler has recently stated that he believes the Republican party will do quite well in Michigan.” But the big goal of founding firm Russo Marsh? Money – for them. Sal Russo telling Politico, “We`re hardly making any money at all.” Politico reporting that after its scheme, the PAC quadrupled its fundraising, paying almost half that money to the Russo Marsh consulting firm itself and to Russo Marsh`s sister company King Media Group. The PAC`s former political director telling “Politico, quote, “We stole the brand name to make money.” None of which stopped Sarah Palin from shilling for the Tea Party Express today in Boston. SARAH PALIN: So, Tea Party Express, we applaud you for uniting and for putting up with all the B.S. from the “lamestream media” with some of the ginned up controversy with the Tea Parties, false accusations of being, this group being racist, being violent. Thank you to the Tea Party Express for putting up with that and still uniting Americans. OLBERMANN: In a whole new way tonight, in the way of the three-card Monty dealer, this woman is an idiot. And if Tea Partiers still doubt they are being played, consider what Palin said at the Tea Party Express rally today about Tax Freedom Day, the day signifying what portion of the year you work to pay your taxes. The later it is, the higher your taxes are. This year it fell on April 9, meaning you worked 99 days just to pay your taxes. This year and last, as the Tax Foundation itself shows, the earliest, therefore the lowest tax days in decades. Under Bush it was never earlier than April 14, meaning you worked at least 104 days for the government under Bush. But here was Palin today: PALIN: Folks, we need your voice now more than ever. Americans now spend 100 days out of the year working for government before we even start earning money for ourselves, for our families, for our small businesses, 100 days out of the year. OLBERMANN: That’s, whoa! As promised now, Politico’s senior reporter, Ken Vogel. #From April 13: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: And Sarah Palin`s inconvenient taxable income. How much has she made since she walked out as governor of Alaska? SARAH PALIN: We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction. OLBERMANN: The direction of $12 million. How is that selly outy thing working for you? That woman is an idiot. All the news and commentary, now on Countdown. #From April 9: KEITH OLBERMANN, IN OPENING TEASER: The Wilkerson declaration: Secretary of State Powell`s chief of staff says Bush and Cheney knew most detainees were innocent. Of Cheney, Lawrence Wilkerson says, “If hundreds of innocent individuals had to suffer in order to detain a handful of hardcore terrorists, so be it.” A spokesman for Mr. Powell says, “The general does not know the basis upon which Colonel Wilkerson claims to know the views and intentions of the senior officials cited in the story.” Our guest, attorney from the Hamdan case: Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift. Republicans gather in New Orleans: SARAH PALIN: Yes, we can kowtow to enemies, criticize allies, vacillate, bow, dither- OLBERMANN: To repeat, this woman is an idiot. #From April 8: KEITH OLBERMANN: Good evening from New York. President Obama and Russian President Medvedev this morning signing a major treaty, the new START treaty, to shrink their nation`s respective arsenals of nuclear weapons. But in our fifth story on the Countdown, the agreement will be moot unless it is ratified by two-thirds of the Senate where Republicans have not yet decided if they’re for it or against it, even though the first START treaty was proposed by none other than President Ronald Reagan and signed by his successor, President George H.W. Bush, and this one has been endorsed by President Reagan`s secretary of state. At a ceremony in Prague, the leaders of the two countries which combined account for 90 percent of the world`s nuclear weapons, putting pen to paper on a document that would reduce their deployed nuclear warheads to 1,550 for each country, a drop of 1/3, still impossibly high. Long-range nuclear weapons would be limited to 700 for each nation. As we mentioned, the first START treaty initiated by President Reagan who once said, quote, “I believe we`ve come to the point that we must got at the matter of realistically reducing, if not totally eliminating, the nuclear weapons, the threat to the world.” The treaty then signed by President Bush in 1991. President Obama`s new START treaty endorsed by former Republican secretaries of state, George Shultz and Henry Kissinger. In fact, Secretary Shultz describing the treaty that was signed today as containing, quote, “relatively modest reductions.” But he concluded, “I think it`s a constructive step.” Secretary of State Clinton at today`s signing ceremony in Prague noting that the Senate has a long history of bipartisan approval of such treaties. The view of Senator Lugar, the ranking Republican on the foreign relations committee, said to be favorable, and an aide to Senator Lugar saying that his boss ultimately hopes the votes to ratify the new START treaty will be there. His party`s leadership possibly hoping something else. In a letter to the President last month, Minority Leader McConnell and Senator Kyl, the number two Republican in the Senate, raising concerns about the treaty because they believe it links offensive weapons and missile defense. The Senators warning the President, quoting, “It is highly unlikely that the Senate would ratify a treaty that includes such a linkage.” Any references to missile defense made only in the preamble and not in the treaty document itself to avoid an official link. At a news conference in Prague, the President is saying that he and the Russian president would continue to talk about missile defense, adding that he believes the U.S. would be no less safe because of it. OBAMA: I`ve repeatedly said that we will not do anything that endangers or limits my ability as commander-in-chief to protect the American people. And we think that missile defense can be an important component of that. But we also want to make clear that the approach that we`ve taken in no way is intended to change the strategic balance between the United States and Russia. OLBERMANN: Meanwhile, Sister Sarah opposing President Obama`s entire nuclear approach, the former half governor of Alaska reducing the President`s earlier decision to take nuclear weapons off the table in the event of a nonnuclear attack, but leave them in place for biological or chemical attacks, reducing all this to terms she could understand, kids on a playground. SARAH PALIN: No administration in America`s history would, I think, ever have considered such a step that we just found out that President Obama is supporting today. You know, that`s kind of like getting out there on the playground, a bunch of kids ready to fight, and one of the kids saying, “Go ahead, punch me in the face and I`m not going to retaliate. Go ahead and do what you want to do with me.” No, it`s unacceptable. This is another thing that the American public, the more that they find out what is a part of this agenda, they`re going to rise up and they`re going to say, no more. National defense, national security is the number one job of the federal government. (CHEERING AND APPLAUSE BY AUDIENCE) OLBERMANN: That woman is an idiot. Earlier on ABC`s World News Tonight, the President asked by George Stephanopoulos to respond to Sarah Palin- OBAMA: I really have no response to that. Last I checked, Sarah Palin is not much of an expert on nuclear issues. OLBERMANN: All right, he put it better than I did. #From August 20, 2004: KEITH OLBERMANN: We at Countdown were preparing an apology for my choice of language last night after the writer Michelle Malkin went on Rush Limbaugh’s radio entertainment program and wrote in her Web blog that I had called her a, quote, “idiot.” It was Ms. Malkin, who on Hardball last night, raised the accusation that John Kerry’s Vietnam wounds may have been self-inflicted. It’s naive and old-fashioned, but I feel you should reserve those terms like “idiot” exclusively for men. Political differences, fault or innocence are all secondary. There are codes. There’s also a problem. I never called her an idiot. OLBERMANN, FROM THE AUGUST 19, 2004, SHOW: And this woman, Malkin, who made a fool out of herself on this network about an hour ago, basically said in this, in what she was reading, the book that accompanied the Swift Boat ad, that Kerry, at least, somebody asked whether or not Kerry should be asked, in that sort of, “let’s step away from actually making a statement, let’s just put it as a question about a question about a question.” JOHN HARWOOD, WALL STREET JOURNAL, FROM AUGUST 19: Right. OLBERMANN, FROM AUGUST 19: -whether or not Kerry shot himself. OLBERMANN: So that’s what you’re dealing with here. She’s an author or a journalist or something, and she misquoted the insult to herself. And keeping track of this particular over-inflating souffle on Hardblogger on MSNBC.com, a nice place to visit on your way to our corner of the Web at countdown.msnbc.com. #From August 19, 2004: KEITH OLBERMANN: “Where, is there a line that could be crossed, though, John? I’m just thinking about what we saw in the last hour. Larry Thurlow said, and we just played a clip of it, that his belief was that John Kerry had arranged for not only his heroism in Vietnam but also his early out, which is a code word for being sent home, and you get sent home usually because you have been injured, meaning he arranged his own injury in some way. And this woman, Malkin, who made a fool out of herself on this network about an hour ago, basically said in what she was reading, the book that accompanied the Swift Boat ad, that Kerry, at least somebody asked whether or not pKerry should be asked in that, sort of, ‘let’s step away from actually making a statement, let’s just put it as a question about a question about a question,’ whether or not Kerry shot himself. If that is the gist of the next Swift Boat ads, is that something that damages more the Republican Party and George Bush than it could possibly damage John Kerry?”

See the original post here:
Olbermann Claimed He’d Never Call a Woman ‘Idiot,’ But Tags Palin ‘Idiot’ 22 Times

UN’s IPCC Tells Scientists To ‘Keep A Distance From The Media’

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change has instructed all 831 researchers contributing to the organization’s next round of assessments to “keep a distance from the media.” Such was disseminated in a July 5 letter from IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri which has already garnered some criticism from folks on both sides of the anthropogenic global warming debate. Even the New York Times’ Andrew Revkin expressed disgust with this revelation Saturday:   I know a number of supervising authors of the forthcoming reports are eager to revise policies and stress openness. There’s plenty of advice on the way from committees reviewing the panel’s practices. I also understand the reflexes involved here, particularly given how some media overplayed claims that the climate panel had erred in parts of its 2007 assessment. But any instinct to pull back after being burned by the news process is mistaken, to my mind. As I explained to a roomful of researchers at the National Academy of Sciences last year, in a world of expanding communication options and shrinking specialized media, scientists and their institutions need to help foster clear and open communication more than ever. Clampdowns on press access almost always backfire. Indeed. Supporting this view was IPCC contributor Edward R. Carr, an associate professor of geography at the University of South Carolina who wrote Friday: Part of the problem for the IPCC is a perceived lack of openness – that something is going on behind closed doors that cannot be trusted. This, in the end, was at the heart of the “climategate” circus – a recent report has exonerated all of the scientists implicated, but some people still believe that there is something sinister going on. There is an easy solution to this – complete openness. I’ve worked on global assessments before, and the science is sound. I’ve been quite critical of the way in which one of the reports was framed (download “Applying DPSIR to Sustainable Development” here), but the science is solid and the conclusions are more refined than ever. Showing people how this process works, and what we do exactly, would go a long way toward getting everyone on the same page with regard to global environmental change, and how we might best address it. So I was dismayed this morning to receive a letter, quite formally titled “Letter No.7004-10/IPCC/AR5 from Dr Pachauri, Chaiman of the IPCC”, that might set such transparency back. While the majority of the letter is a very nice congratulations on being selected as part of the IPCC, the third paragraph is completely misguided: “I would also like to emphasize that enhanced media interest in the work of the IPCC would probably subject you to queries about your work and the IPCC. My sincere advice would be that you keep a distance from the media and should any questions be asked about the Working Group with which you are associated, please direct such media questions to the Co-chairs of your Working Group and for any questions regarding the IPCC to the secretariat of the IPCC.” This “bunker mentality” will do nothing for the public image of the IPCC. The members of my working group are among the finest minds in the world. We are capable of speaking to the press about what we do without the help of minders or gatekeepers. I hope my colleagues feel the same way, and the IPCC sees the light . . . For an organization that has suffered a tremendous loss of credibility in the past twelve months, any attempt to shelter this process from complete sunshine would be totally misguided. The international community’s belief in AGW has been plummeting thanks to numerous missteps by those promoting the theory. With Global Warmingist-in-Chief Al Gore now in the middle of a divorce and a sex scandal, his contributions to helping publicize AR-5 could end up being limited. Regardless of recent findings largely in support of ClimateGate scientists — the realist community never expected anything other than this as these folks weren’t about to rule against their own! — America’s media have seemed largely detached from this debate in current months. Witness the relative lack of global warming hysteria this past week as temperatures in the northeast broke records. With this in mind, if the IPCC wants the normally compliant press to assist it in making its case when AR-5 is published in 2013, it had better do everything possible to make journalists a part of the process. Failing this, you could end up with far less media support for whatever is published. In the end, this could be the best thing for this debate AND the planet, for without the press banging the AGW drum, climate alarmists are going to have a very difficult time selling their gloom and doom. That is not to say realists should hope for a media blackout. As science has always been on the side of those not buying into Gore’s favorite money-making scheme, full disclosure and openness are in everyone’s best interest. 

More here:
UN’s IPCC Tells Scientists To ‘Keep A Distance From The Media’

Open Thread: Gingrich Says Obama Doesn’t Understand America

For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: Newt Gingrich says President Obama doesn’t understand America (h/t Ed Morrissey ). Thoughts?

Follow this link:
Open Thread: Gingrich Says Obama Doesn’t Understand America

Rand Paul To America’s Poor: You Don’t Have It So Bad

Don't fret, American poor people! Turns out you're living better than “the rest of the world,” according to Kentucky Republican Senate nominee Rand Paul. Responding to an attack from Democratic nominee Jack Conway at a candidate forum yesterday, Paul tried to defend his past statement that the president criticizing BP is “un-American.” Paul launched into a spirited defense of “the engine of capitalism,” and worried that assaults on it — like the criticisms of BP from Conway and his Democratic friends — could lead to a “day of reckoning” in the U.S., and perhaps a Depression. This somehow led to a lesson Paul said Kentuckians should hold dear: Sure there are “problems” with the way America deals with the poor, but when they think about it, poor folks should thank goodness they're not stuck in one of those other horrible countries. “The poor in our country are enormously better off than the rest of the world,” Paul said. “Doesn't mean we can't do better, but we have to acknowledge and be proud of our system of capitalism, be proud of our American way.” How'd he get there? Paul told a little story about the Cold War to set up his argument that the poor have it pretty good in America when you really stop to think about it: One of the important lessons that came out of the Cold War — and this is an important description that I don't think comes up enough — the Cold War was won by America because the engine of capitalism defeated the engine of socialism. The Soviets used to show a propaganda film — they wanted to show how horrible America was and how our poor were doing so poorly. They filmed a building in the poor section of New York with some broken windows and they said, 'Oh this is how the poor in America lives.' But it backfired on them because the Soviet citizens looked at that video closely and they saw flickering color television sets in all those windows. So, the takeway: Don't worry, freezing poor people with broken windows. At least you've got color TV. added by: TimALoftis

CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Conservative Talk Show Hosts are Uneducated

On Friday’s Rick’s List, CNN’s Rick Sanchez attacked conservative economic policy, singling out the right’s support for lower tax rates, and complained that ” we in America are so easily led to go against our own interests …. you would find that at least half…[are] pulling for the rich guy.” Sanchez also belittled conservative talk show hosts: ” Many…don’t even have a college degree .” The anchor led the 3 pm Eastern hour with a rant against ” these guys on talk radio, some of whom make hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions of dollars ” and their defense of “the money guys…the super-rich, night in and night out- you know who I’m talking about- you will hear this and you have heard this consistent narrative. We’re being held back by high taxes in this country, high tax rates- cut taxes on the wealthy and, zoom, there it goes. Our economy is going to be back with a vengeance. Get the government off our backs and all our problems in this country are going to be solved.” Sanchez then caricatured the conservative take on the present economic situation and, unsurprising, introduced race into the issue. He also targeted CNBC personality and Tea Party hero Rick Santelli: SANCHEZ: And, by the way, the mess we’re still digging out from: it’s not Wall Street’s fault, not a thing to do with the government turning a blind eye to the high-rolling financial shenanigans of some people on Wall Street. No, not at all. It’s the poor people’s fault, who brought the rest of us to our knees, mostly, by the way- I know you hear this- I know you hear this- mostly minorities, them Hispanics and them blacks who bought the homes that they couldn’t afford. They defaulted on those loans, and then we all went down, by golly. Do you think I’m kidding about this? Look, here’s one of the biggest media darlings of this message . RICK SANTELLI (from MSNBC’s “Hardball”): Why don’t you put up a website to have people vote on the Internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages? SANCHEZ: This guy’s a superstar now. That’s right, superstar: ‘losers.’ Remember that? If you lose your job and you end up defaulting on your mortgage, you are a loser. That was the rant that fueled, in many ways, the Tea Party movement. Quit subsidizing the losers, America. How did the CNN anchor refute Santelli and “these guys on the radio”? He turned to the left-wing New York Times: SANCHEZ: Now, let me show you something else. I want to show you- hey, Rob, are you good there. Where’s the newspaper? I want to bring you in the newspaper that I had here just a moment ago. Here it is. Here’s The New York Times. All right? What’s that say? Can you see it? Biggest defaulters on mortgages are the rich. So, who are the losers? Hispanics? Minorities? Black people who bought more home than they could really afford? Once again, let’s look at this. The biggest defaulters on mortgages are the rich…more than one in seven homeowners with loans in excess of $1 million are seriously delinquent, okay? Now, let’s look at the rest of us, people like you and me. About one in 12 mortgages below the $1 million mark is delinquent. Who are the losers again? Who are the losers again, Mr. Santelli, or whatever your name is? Okay, the article goes on to say, though it’s hard to prove, the data suggests that many of the well-to-do are purposely dumping their financially-draining properties. They’re doing this on purpose. You know what? I don’t want it. I will dump it, just as they would any other sour investment. Fine, but let’s be clear. The rich aren’t paying their mortgages, and at a higher rate than anyone else. Sanchez then set up a straw man of the conservative position on taxes: SANCHEZ: I want to make a point about taxes now. To hear the narrative out there, you would think that we’re the highest taxed nation on the planet, in the history of the planet. You hear it every day on your way home. Just turn on your radio, folks. In fact, there’s another list out there I want to show you, of the top 30 industrial nations in the world. Where do you think the United States ranks? Now, you hear every single day we’re the most taxed country in the world, no question about it. And it’s all these politicians and the government. And where do you think we are? Of all the developed countries in the world, where do you think we are, as far as the tax rate? Where do you think we are? Twenty-sixth- twenty-sixth out of thirty. That’s according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development- twenty-sixth out of thirty. Again, here’s the list. Here’s my highlight marks that I have put right there. You see it.  We are right after- here, I’ll tell you. Who comes before us? Switzerland, Mexico and Australia. Who comes after us? Ireland, Luxembourg, Iceland, and New Zealand. After mouthing the left’s consistent talking point that “the rich have gotten…richer, the poor…poorer,” the anchor brought on Georgia Tech Professor Danny Boston, who agreed that the New York Times statistic “debunks the stereotype” on the economy. Later, Sanchez returned to his tax straw man and bemoaned how so many people hold the economic conservative position: SANCHEZ: We hear we’re the most taxed country in the world. That seems to show that maybe we really aren’t. We’re 26th of the 30 developing [sic] nations. We hear that it was the poor people who bought too many homes that they couldn’t afford. Now, we’ve got a statistic saying, no, that’s not true. In fact, it’s the rich who have been the most delinquent and defaulted on their mortgages. It’s like statistic after statistic seems to- why is it that we in America are so easily led to go against our own interests? Because- and you know what I mean by that. Most of the people who are super rich in this country are- what, 1 percent? Then there’s 99 percent of the rest of us, and yet, if you look at studies politically and sociologically, you would find that at least half of that 99 percent is pulling for the rich guy , and saying- oh, yes, it’s not his fault, it’s our fault. Near the end of the segment, the CNN anchor took a conservative talking point against President Obama and applied it to Professor Boston, as a set up to launch his attack on conservative talk show hosts: SANCHEZ: Well- you know, a lot of the folks who would criticize someone like you- they would criticize you, first of all, because you’re a college professor, which, in their mind, makes you overeducated, and thus, stupid. But is that something that’s frustrating as well, that you know this stuff and can explain it as easily as you just did to us, but yet, t he people who are really leading the charge in this country are the guys on the radio and- many of which don’t even have a college degree . Well, Mr. Sanchez, as you demonstrated yourself, you can have a college degree and still make mistakes about basic geography, such as when you misidentified the Galapagos Islands as Hawaii during CNN’s live coverage of the February 27, 2010 earthquake in Chile.

More here:
CNN’s Rick Sanchez: Conservative Talk Show Hosts are Uneducated