Tag Archives: attention

Jessica Alba Flashes Some Booty

It’s not every day that I get pictures of Jessica Alba flashing her ass so I’m a little confused as to what I’m supposed to do here. She’s normally so meticulous as to how she presents herself, most of the time as a stay at home mom in sweatpants, so it’s strange to see her letting it all hang out. Literally. Anyhow, I’m not complaining, even a little Jessica Alba ass is better than none at all so I should keep my mouth shut and enjoy.

Audrina Patridge’s Fake Boobies Doing Nothing

Hmmm. I think I’m running out of things to say about Audrina Patridge . I’m not kidding, here she is doing….. Nothing. Literally nothing, she’s walking down the street doing absolutely nothing. Granted she’s wearing a nice little top that’s kind of falling off, but aside from that nothing. And that’s what’s happening in my pants when I look at these pictures….. Nothing! Thanks a lot.

Howard Stern’s Wife’s Naughty Pic of the Day

This was sent in by my good friend I’ve never spoke to or hung out with or even met named Chris. He sent in this picture Beth Stern sent to Howard Stern a few weeks ago, only to be put on his website, cuz that’s what you do when you have hot pussy for a wife and you look like Howard Stern, in a kind of revenge to all the people who teased him, kinda way, especially when your wife is a fame whore who likes being seen sexually by the public to compete with all the other bitches he gets on his show for his attention, you know to keep the interest alive….cuz he gives her the seriously good life… Something I’ve been unable to do with this site, cuz traffic is dying more and more each day. Advertisers are non-existant. The end is near…But I’ll sink with the ship….

See more here:
Howard Stern’s Wife’s Naughty Pic of the Day

Selena Gomez’s ‘A Year Without Rain’ Video Premieres September 3

Clip debuts on Disney Channel same day as Demi Lovato/ Jonas Brothers’ ‘Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam.’ By Jocelyn Vena Selena Gomez Photo: Kevin Parry/WireImage Demi Lovato may not be singing on Selena Gomez’s forthcoming A Year Without Rain album, set for release on September 21, but fans can look forward to a new video from the singer. Gomez announced that the video for the album’s second single, “A Year Without Rain,” will premiere on the Disney Channel on Friday, September 3, the same day that the Jonas Brothers and Lovato’s “Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam” debuts on the network. Gomez made the announcement on her Facebook page. Earlier this summer, she released the track “Round & Round” as the album’s first single. The deluxe edition of the album will feature additional material, including three extra songs as well as music videos and behind-the-scenes footage of the making of the “A Year Without Rain” music video. It will also give fans a look at what life was like for Gomez during her European tour. Gomez, whose show “Wizards of Waverly Place” just won an Emmy award , has said that the album will show a growth in her sound. And rumor has it that Miley Cyrus (reportedly on the track “Off the Chain”) and Katy Perry (on the song “Rock God”) will appear on the album. “[‘A Year Without Rain’ is] basically one of my favorite songs on the record. [The album’s] kind of got a more feel-good dance beat and feel. I love it. It’s different. [It] kind of shows my growth in my music,” she said. “There’s a song called ‘Intuition’ that’s one of my favorites. The message is basically, every decision that you regret or second-guess, [just] do it [anyway]. I love that message so much.” Related Artists Selena Gomez

Read the original post:
Selena Gomez’s ‘A Year Without Rain’ Video Premieres September 3

Kendra Wilkinson Recalls Flirting With Coach On ‘When I Was 17’

The reality-TV bombshell looks back at her high school soccer career on the latest episode, premiering Saturday at 11 a.m. By Mawuse Ziegbe Kendra Wilkinson appears on “When I Was 17” Photo: MTV News Kendra Wilkinson has made her mark as a bubbly tomboy-ish sexpot, graduating from Hugh Hefner’s trio of girlfriends to the wife of NFL player Hank Baskett. It appears the giggly star of the E! reality series “Kendra,” which delves into her life as a party-girl-turned-homemaker and mom, got an early start mixing her love life with sports. “Soccer was my love. I had a huge crush on my soccer coach. He was like the hottest thing to ever exist,” Wilkinson says on the latest episode of “When I Was 17,” premiering Saturday at 11 a.m. Wilkinson admits she went to extra lengths to get the attention of her extra-hot coach, including altering her uniform to show off her gams. “I would totally flirt with him. I would wear shorter shorts than the other girls on purpose.” Wilkinson’s brazenness didn’t end with hiked-up shorts. The starlet, who first made a pop-culture splash as regular on “The Girls Next Door,” cavorting about the fabled Playboy Mansion with Hefner and his other girlfriends, Holly Madison and Bridget Marquardt, says she would pretend to suck at soccer to get more face time with her swoonworthy coach. “We would have to run, and I would purposely be the last because he would be there behind me going, ‘C’mon Kendra, c’mon!’ ” Wilkinson remembers. “I just loved that. I loved just having my soccer coach just yelling at me. It turned me on.” “When I Was 17” — this week featuring Kendra Wilkinson, Asher Roth and Kelly Osbourne — premieres Saturday at 11 a.m. on MTV. Related Videos Asher Roth And Kendra Wilkinson: When I Was 17 Ep. 17 Preview Related Photos When I Was 17 | Ep. 17 | Celebrity Photo Flashback

Go here to see the original:
Kendra Wilkinson Recalls Flirting With Coach On ‘When I Was 17’

Lauren Conrad Because I’ve Got Nothing Else

It’s obviously a pretty lame slow celebrity news day if I’ve got pictures of Lauren Conrad on the site, the other other other girl from that crappy show with the girls with the fake boobs that I never watched. Sure she’s wearing tight leggings and, well that’s pretty much it. Maybe if you’ve got a thing for chicks in pink hoodies you’ll enjoy these. You’re also a weirdo.

In July, LA School Officials Defended RFK Taj Mahal K-12 Complex as ‘More Than Justified’

Well, it didn’t take to much digging to find people who think that the $578 million cost of the new Taj Mahal complex known as the Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools in Los Angeles (pictured at right; noted last night at NewsBusters and BizzyBlog ) isn’t that big of a deal. What I found makes me wonder why it took so long for waste of this magnitude to become a national story. On July 9, at LA’s Daily News , Connie Llanos chronicled much of the story behind how costs spiraled out of control. Readers will have to go to the link to get that detail. In terms of the project’s final cost, Llanos found plenty of people willing to say that spending over $135,000 per seat is okey-dokey (bolds are mine): RFK is LAUSD’s most costly campus – and it needs more cash … District officials say the cost of the Robert F. Kennedy complex is more than justified if you consider its urban location, historical significance and expected community role. “It has all the modern amenities, like an underground garage, a pool, a state-of-the-art auditorium…,” said James Sohn, LAUSD’s chief facilities executive. “In that context, cost of the schools is appropriate.” The 23-acre Wilshire Boulevard lot will bring the park-starved neighborhood much-needed green space, including soccer fields and a state-of-the-art swimming pool. It also includes public art pieces and a marble mural memorial to Kennedy, who was running for president when he was gunned down in the hotel’s kitchen. Still, some of the items purchased for the school have caught the attention of top district officials, such as talking benches designed by artists to commemorate the historic significance of the Ambassador Hotel and its famous Cocoanut Grove nightclub. … But the schools chief said small extravagances shouldn’t detract from seeing the school as a centerpiece for the community and the city. From its inception, the Ambassador schools were intended to be one of the most elaborate campuses, funded through the district’s $20 billion voter-approved construction bond program. … School board member Steve Zimmer said he will look closely at the change orders that have been requested for the project. But he added that “if the true cost were $250,000 a seat, it would be worth every penny.” … Charter school officials, however, said LAUSD’s construction costs were exorbitant. “If you look at that cost per seat, that is three or four times what many charter schools are delivering in the Los Angeles area,” said Jed Wallace, president of the California Charter School Association. Some context: The end of Llanos’s report contains comparative cost figures for other facilities in the LA area. Here are a few, and when they were built: Staples Center: $375 million, 1999 Walt Disney Concert Hall: $274 million, 2003 Universal Studios backlot: $200 million, 2010 Downtown cathedral: $190 million, 2002 More context: Earlier this year, New Trier, a relatively well-off school district in suburban Chicago, ” known for its large spending per student,” proposed building a new high school for its 3,100 students at a cost of $174 million. Even though that figure is about 60% less per seat than LA’s RFK, locals characterized it as a “Taj Mahal” project. One Chicago TV station covering the proposal simply asked: “Are you kidding me?” Voters resoundingly rejected the new high school by a margin of 62. Keep in mind that all of this is occurring as both  California  and  Los Angeles  are on the verge of financial collapse. Yet another shocker: Llanos writes that RFK’s cost is “40 percent higher than the average school built in the central Los Angeles area over the past two years.” That’s all? From here, it looks like LAUSD got its $20 billion in bond money and immediately set out to burn through it all as quickly as possible. Prediction: Ten years from now, if not less, we’re going to be seeing stories about how high building maintenance and energy costs are stretching the district’s finances. Cry me a river. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Link:
In July, LA School Officials Defended RFK Taj Mahal K-12 Complex as ‘More Than Justified’

Kim Kardashian’s Lady Lumps Fight For Attention

In case you haven’t noticed by now, Kim Kardashian has got some pretty impressive curves on her. Here she is promoting yet another one of her silly fragrances, which isn’t all that exciting, but she’s managed to stuffed all of her good parts nicely into a tight little dress for me so I’m enjoying it. Not to mention that her cleavage is showing us that she’s more than just a big fat ass . I for one am not going to get in the way of a chick who’s ass and boobs are fighting for my attention. Keep up the good work.

George Stephanopoulos Ignores Attack by Jennifer Aniston That O’Reilly ‘Insulted’ Single Mothers

Jennifer Aniston appeared on Thursday’s Good Morning America and slammed Bill O’Reilly for “insulting women.” The actress, promoting “The Switch,” her new film about being a single mother, complained about remarks by the Fox News host. Aniston derided, “[The comments were]  also saying something – insulting women that are out there doing this on their own. I was raised by – my mother was single. You know? ” [MP3 audio here .] In fact, O’Reilly, on his August 11 program , did not “insult” single mothers. He went out of his way to respect such moms: “I want to be fair about this, because there have- there are many- there are millions of single mothers who do a great job raising their kids.” What the FNC anchor did do was praise the importance of fathers: “Aniston can hire a battery of people to help her, but she cannot hire a dad…And Dads bring a psychology to children that is, in this society, I believe, under emphasized. I think men get hosed all day long in the parental arena.” He added, “…She’s throwing a message out to 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds, okay, that, hey, you don’t need a guy.” Stephanopoulos never challenged Aniston on her assertions. He only offered softball questions, such as wondering, “But usually you don’t respond to this kind of thing. Why did you decide to respond?” In fact, he ended up agreeing with Aniston’s assessment: “And you’re right. The movie is a celebration of family.” The ABC host only laughed at her snarky remark, “I was actually glorifying 12-year-olds going out there and getting knocked up and doing it by themselves. ‘Cause that’s what I like to preach.”  A transcript of Aniston’s comments on the August 19 Good Morning America: 8:15 GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You caught the attention of Bill O’Reilly. Could you ever believe that was going to happen? He said you were glorifying- JENNIFER ANISTON: I never actually thought that my name and that name would ever be in one sentence, I must say. STEPHANOPOULOS: He basically said you were glorifying single motherhood and- ANISTON: I was actually glorifying 12-year-olds going out there and getting knocked up and doing it by themselves. ‘Cause that’s what I like to preach. That was one- STEPHANOPOULOS: [laughs] But usually you don’t respond to this kind of thing. Why did you decide to respond? ANISTON: I just felt it needed, it was begging for a response. It was just such an unfair statement that he made against me. And you know, people say things about me all the time, and you just kind of go “Oh, whatever.” But this was not just about me. It was also saying something – insulting women that are out there doing this on their own. I was raised by – my mother was single. You know? It doesn’t always start off that way. But sort of, life happens. STEPHANOPOULOS: And you’re right. The movie is a celebration of family. ANISTON: It is. It’s family. Here is a partial transcript of O’Reilly’s actual comments from the August 11, 2010 edition of the O’Reilly Factor: BILL O’REILLY: I want to be fair about this, because there have — there are many — there are millions of single mothers who do a great job raising their kids. MARGARET HOOVER: Do a great job. O’REILLY: And they’re abandoned and they’re all kinds — and they do. It’s possible. But it’s not optimum, and that’s where Ms. Aniston makes her mistake. That she’s throwing a message out to 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds, OK, that, hey, you don’t need a guy. You don’t need a Dad. Dad, ah, you know. That’s destructive to our society. GRETCHEN CARLSON: Because it’s — it’s tough to be a parent. I know. I have two kids at home, and trust me, I’m glad every day that I have a husband to help me with the hard work of being a parent. However, here’s the alarming statistic: 36 percent of all babies born in the U.S. now are born to single mothers. O’REILLY: Yes. They don’t — right. CARLSON: Thirty-six percent. But — and young people, you’re right. They do not have the cognitive ability… O’REILLY: I don’t like this trend. CARLSON: … to know the difference of a 40-year-old woman who’s financially stable having a child… O’REILLY: Yes. CARLSON: … and a 16-year-old girl. O’REILLY: Aniston can hire a battery of people to help her, but she cannot hire a dad. OK? And Dads bring a psychology to children that is, in this society, I believe, under emphasized. I think men get hosed all day long in the parental arena. HOOVER: Do you think they’ve earned it? Because I’ve got to tell you, of the 30 percent of single families, a full two thirds of them — no, I’m sorry, a full 80 percent of them are single families that are run by mothers, not fathers. O’REILLY: And any man who leaves their children is not a man. CARLSON: Well… O’REILLY: OK? Let’s make that perfectly clear. But the fathers who do try hard are underappreciated and diminished by people like Jennifer Aniston. HOOVER: Well, I think Jennifer Aniston is simply making a point. I agree she’s glamorizing single parenthood. O’REILLY: Diminishing — no. HOOVER: She’s glamorizing single parenthood, diminishing two-parent households. O’REILLY: Diminishing the role of the dad. CARLSON: She is.

See the original post here:
George Stephanopoulos Ignores Attack by Jennifer Aniston That O’Reilly ‘Insulted’ Single Mothers

Lindsay Lohan May Have Prescription To Blame For Drug Problems

Adderall may have exacerbated any existing issues, expert says. By Gil Kaufman Lindsay Lohan Photo: OutOfSightMedia/ Getty Images It may turn out that the disease that troubled actress Lindsay Lohan isn’t suffering from is the one that could have caused many of her recent problems. According to TMZ , the doctors at the UCLA rehabilitation facility where Lohan is currently 19 days into a court-ordered, 90-day inpatient stay reportedly believe that the “Mean Girls” star was misdiagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and that the commonly prescribed drug used to treat that disorder, Adderall, may have caused her to exhibit the irrational, manic symptoms similar to those of someone abusing cocaine or methamphetamine. Lohan’s lawyer has not returned requests for comment from MTV News, but Dr. Peter Breggin, a psychiatrist and leading expert on the dangers of the over-prescribing of psychiatric drugs, said it doesn’t really matter if Lohan, 24, was misdiagnosed or not. “Whether or not she was misdiagnosed, [Adderall] will have the same effect,” said Breggin, the author of “Medication Madness: The Role of Psychiatric Drugs in Cases of Violence, Suicide and Crime,” who has not treated Lohan and does not have first-hand knowledge of her case. “It’s a myth that it will have a different effect whether you have ADHD or not,” he explained. “If she was given Adderall, it’s entirely possible she would have a reaction that was indistinguishable from that of methamphetamine or cocaine, including producing manic or psychotic behavior.” While Adderall has helped many teenagers and adults suffering from ADHD gain control of their lives, Breggin said it is possible to become addicted to the drug, which, at high doses can cause out-of-control episodes. Add in an addiction to or chronic use of cocaine and other stimulants and, he said, that person could very easily be susceptible to the abuse of Adderall. “Adderall is pure amphetamine and it changes the neurotransmitters in a similar fashion [as other stimulants],” he said, noting that research in humans and animals has shown that the effect on those vital neurotransmitters is to make the person crave stimulants. “You don’t want to give someone an amphetamine who has or had a craving for methamphetamine or cocaine.” While Lohan has never discussed what issues have sent her to rehab three previous times, she has a history of arrests for drunk driving , including one in 2007 during which police allegedly found a packet of cocaine in her pocket. “You would not want to give anyone, for any purpose, Adderall if they were known to abuse methamphetamine or cocaine. You’re just setting them up for being hooked on Adderall,” Breggin said. Before she went to jail, it was revealed that among the prescription medicines Lohan was taking was the sleep aid Ambien, which didn’t surprise Breggin. “Ambien is sold for insomnia, but it’s a sedative and you use it to come down,” he said. “It’s common to go from a stimulant to a sedative to try to control the experience of going up and down.” Before her pair of DUI arrests in 2007, Lohan was often been spotted drinking late into the night. Breggin said that also didn’t surprise him, since alcohol, like Ambien, is a sedative used to counteract stimulation. The upshot of the alleged misdiagnosis, according to TMZ’s unnamed source familiar with Lohan’s treatment at UCLA, is that the former judge in Lohan’s case, Marsha Revel, may have “overreacted” when she ordered the actress to serve 90 days in rehab. The site claimed that Lohan has been weaned off all the medications she was taking — which also included the serious pain medication Dilaudid, antidepressants Zoloft and Trazodone, and acid-reflux treatment Nexium — with no adverse reaction. She has also reportedly not shown symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. With all that in mind, the new judge in the case will meet with lawyers next week to discuss a possible early release for Lohan from in-patient. Related Photos The Highs And Lows Of Lindsay Lohan Related Artists Lindsay Lohan

Originally posted here:
Lindsay Lohan May Have Prescription To Blame For Drug Problems