Tag Archives: brazilian

More Kos-MSNBC Drama: Phil Griffin Bans Markos From Guest Appearances

When you’re too crazy for MSNBC… Markos Moulitsas, founder of the far-left blog Daily Kos, announced today that he has been ” blacklisted ” by MSNBC for taunting “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough. “I just don’t know how one could reasonably expect to be welcomed onto our network while publicly antagonizing one of our hosts at the same time,” MSNBC president Phil Griffin told Moulitsas. Griffin’s ostracism marks the second instance in recent days that a prominent MSNBC personality has spurned Kos or his blog. A couple weeks ago, Keith Olbermann accounced he would no longer be writing for the site. He returned a few days later. Still, there seem to be some reservations even at liberal MSNBC about the often crude, pugilistic style employed by so many of the Kossacks. What set off the most recent tiff? A tweet exchange, recounted below the fold. JoeNBC: The Sestak story is as unbelievable a cover story as Nixon throwing little Checkers under the bus. A farce on it’s face. Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1. The press will let this laughable story slide. markos: Like story of a certain dead intern. RT @JoeNBC: Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1. Markos: But if you want to talk about bullshit “scandals”, @JoeNBC, there’s this one about Joe Sestak and the White House you might’ve heard of. JoeNBC: @markos Unbelievable. You have a long history of spreading lies suggesting I am a murderer. This is the 3rd or 4th time by my count. Markos: @JoeNBC, I’ve never suggested you’re a murderer. I’ve noted media hypocrisy in going after Gary Condit. But he was Dem. You aren’t. JoeNBC: Anyone in media who interviews @markos, know that you’re extending your credibility to someone who regularly suggests that I’m a murderer. Markos: A bit touchy, @JoeNBC? Links for where I accuse you of being a murderer please. Moulitsas didn’t get any links, but he did get this message from Griffin: Markos, Blog if you must, but here is my on the record statement to you which I ask that you print in full: Yes, after I became aware of the ugly cheap shot  you  took at Joe on Twitter, I asked the teams to take a break from booking you on our shows for a while. I found the comments to be in poor taste, and utterly uncalled for in a civil discourse. I’m hoping this will be only temporary and that the situation can be resolved in a mature fashion, but until then I just don’t know how one could reasonably expect to be welcomed onto our network while publicly antagonizing one of our hosts at the same time. The DailyKos community has been among the most supportive of MSNBC, and we continue to appreciate that support. Markos thinks that Griffin responded the way he did in defense of the cable network’s “token conservative.” “I’ve criticized Chris Matthews before, sometimes harshly,” he whined, “and it never led to me being banned.” Moulitsas fails to grasp — as one Kos reader put it — that he didn’t go after Matthews like that… I mean don’t get me wrong, that tweet was some piping hot ether and I admire it from a trolling perspective, but c’mon. You were clearly taking a swing at Joe’s jaw with the “dead intern” line. You connected, his skull reeled like Balboa in Round 10, he winced in pain. You weren’t trying to make some larger point about media bias. You were looking to bust somebody upside they head. And that is the Kossack way. Just not the MSNBC way, apparently.

Link:
More Kos-MSNBC Drama: Phil Griffin Bans Markos From Guest Appearances

Cox Reporter Rips Right-Wing Luminaries for ‘Rumor’ About Offshore Drilling Plans in Cuba, Burns Herself

Rush has spent a considerable portion of today’s broadcast ripping into this article by Christine Stapleton of Cox Newspapers, and rightly so, for the first three of the four opening paragraphs that follow: Despite the warnings of Dick Cheney, George Will, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News, the Russians are not drilling for oil off Cuba. Neither are the Chinese. In fact, no one — not even Cuba — is drilling for oil off Cuba. The pesky and persistent rumor, bubbling back up with the Deepwater Horizon disaster, is still nothing more than a pesky and persistent rumor — aired in 2008 by former Vice President Cheney (who got the misinformation from conservative columnist Will), repeated on Fox News and recently revived by conservative radio commentator Limbaugh, who told his listeners 10 days after the spill: “The Russians are drilling in a deal with the Cubans in the Gulf. The Vietnamese and Angola are drilling for oil in the Gulf in deals with the Cubans.” However, as oil from BP’s exploded well continues surging from the Gulf floor and washing onto Panhandle beaches, the rumor is poised to become fact. Repsol, a Spanish company, expects to begin drilling off Cuba in 2011, according to published reports and oil-industry analysts. Companies from at least 10 other countries, including Russia and China, are negotiating or already have signed lease deals to drill off Cuba. It’s as if Cheney, Limbaugh, and Will have been making things up out of thin air all along, nothing at all has happened until now, and they’re all of sudden just getting lucky. Horse manure. Stapleton’s comeback would more than likely be, “I’m right, because no one is drilling right at this very moment.” Well, ma’am, if you’re going to get that technical, I will too. This Wall Street Journal story notes that Repsol did some drilling in 2004, and then stopped after results were disappointing. So the Spanish company isn’t about to “begin” drilling, it’s going to “resume” doing so. And while we’re at it, Ms. Stapleton, a person doesn’t issue “warnings” about what is happening, they do so about what’s coming. So when you try to claim that the conservative trio was claiming that substantial drilling was already occurring two years ago, anyone reading and listening in context knew that they meant that the Russians, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Angolans — and for that matter, Petrobas , the Brazilian-owned oil company in which George Soros has hundreds of millions of dollars invested (how did she miss that?) — are attempting to work out and in several cases have worked out arrangements with the Cuban government that would or will lead to drilling operations. The linked article also notes that: Cuba’s portion of the Gulf of Mexico (Click image at top right to enlarge — Ed.) has been divided into 59 blocks, of which 17 have been contracted out to companies including Spanish oil giant Repsol and its partners, Malaysia’s Petronas, Brazil’s Petrobras, Venezuela’s PDVSA and PetroVietnam. Shazam! They already have contracts (for what that’s worth in dealing with Fidel Castro’s communist workers’ paradise). Rush also pointed to this Associated Press item from July 2006 carried at the Washington Post. From here on out, say a growing chorus of experts, America will pay a price for maintaining its 45-year trade ban with the communist nation — a strategic and economic price that will have negative repercussions for the United States in the decades to come. What has changed the equation? Oil. To be more specific, recent, sizable discoveries of it in the North Cuba Basin — deep-water fields that have already drawn the interest of companies from China, India, Norway, Spain, Canada, Venezuela and Brazil. This, in turn, has reheated debate in the U.S. Congress and the Cuban-American community on an old question: Has the time finally come to shelve the embargo — given America’s need for more sources of crude at a time of rising gas prices, soaring global demand and the outbreak of war in the Middle East? Thus, there has been interest in Cuba’s oil for four years. This, along with the contractual arrangements cited above, makes the existence of plans to drill in Cuba far more than the “pesky and persistent rumor” Ms. Stapleton cited. Ms. Stapleton should have put a hold on the bashing and stuck to reporting the relevant facts. Instead she chose to insult informed readers’ intelligence by taking cheap and ineffective shots at people who have been proven right time and time again — including this time. Your loss, ma’am. Graphic found at the Palm Beach Post . Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

The rest is here:
Cox Reporter Rips Right-Wing Luminaries for ‘Rumor’ About Offshore Drilling Plans in Cuba, Burns Herself

Gulf Oil Disaster: Evidence that demands investigation and verdict

Dear Congressman/Senator, I am deeply concerned with the handling of the cleanup and containment effort of the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. As such, it is now the time to lay aside partisan issues, and issue a criminal and ethical investigation into the Obama administration’s dealings with BP oil, evidence of prior knowledge for the spill, and the relationship of money exchanged in return for complete collusion and complicity in this whole situation. Clearly, after citing the circumstantial evidence below, you should see that a criminal investigation into the roles of the Federal Government under the Obama administration and BP Oil, in the events leading up to the creation of this disaster, to the lack of federal response is warranted and overdue. EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS AN INVESTIGATION AND A VERDICT 1. Barack Obama received more money from BP Oil than ANY OTHER politician in the last 20 years – Republican or Democrat. (Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 ) 2. Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff to Barack Obama, lives in a luxury Washington D.C. apartment given to him by a high-level BP Oil Staffer (L.A. Times, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/06/rahm-emanuel-bp-gul-oil-spill… ) 3. Goldman Sachs, a part owner of BP, was the second highest contributor to Barack Obama, giving him just a little over $1 million (CNN, http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/20/obama.goldman.donations/index.html ) 4. The current chairman of Goldman Sachs was also the chairman of BP oil. He stepped down from BP in 2009 ( Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sutherland ) 5. Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, BP gave more money to Obama (Washington Independent, http://washingtonindependent.com/226/does-exxon-mobil-support-obama ) 6. George Soros, Who Helped Bankroll Obama’s 2008 campaign, is an aggressive investor in oil, and he is instrumental and is influential in Brazilian Oil Company Petrobras. (The Guru Focus, http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=33828 ) 7. Curiously, CEO of BP, Tony Hayward dumped 1/3 of his BP stock holdings($2.1 million dollars) weeks before the oil rig explosion (The UK Daily Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7804922/BP-chie… ) 8. Coincidentally, Goldman Sachs dumped 44% – 4,680,822 shares – of its stock in BP Oil weeks before the spill – no other oil company, just BP. This also represented an unusual transaction, being two times the size of any normal stock trade for an institution its size. (Raw Story, http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0602/month-oil-spill-goldman-sachs-sold-250-million-… ) 9. Weeks before the oil spill, Haliburton acquired Boots & Coots, a Houston-based oil well intervention/oil safety/oil spill cleanup company, an investment criticized by many as an “unwise” investment at the time (Houston Chronicle, http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6952547.html ) 10. It has also now been learned that President Obama stands to make over $85 Million over the next 10 years due to this “accident.” It seems as though Vanguard, Pres. Obama’s asset holdings company, dumped all of his shares of BP oil stocks in the weeks before the “accident.” http://www.twawki.com/?p=6768 11. On March 31st, Obama lifted a 20 year moratorium on offshore drilling, opening the Gulf of Mexico to new exploration and new competition amongst oil companies (Bellona, http://www.bellona.org/articles/articles_2010/US_drilling_moratorium_lifted ) 12. As early as February 2010, BP engineer referred to this particular rig as a “nightmare rig.” (AOL News, http://www.aolnews.com/gulf-oil-spill/article/bp-engineer-brian-morel-called-dee… ) 13. Jimmy Harrell, chief operator for Transocean who owned the rig was well aware of problems and warned of such a disaster. Harrell is quoted is telling an unknown person on the phone, “”Are you f****g happy? Are you f****g happy? The rig’s on fire! I told you this was gonna happen.” ( Mother Jones http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/06/rigs-fire-i-told-you-was-gonna-happen ) 14. BP representatives knowingly and willfully gave the wrong orders on how to prevent an explosion on the rig. In order to control the pressure, cement(known as mud in the industry), is normally thrown down to seal of leaks. Instead, BP reps overruled the opinions of the workers and ordered sea water to be thrown down. This is clear evidence of criminal negligence, ineptitude, or criminal sabbotage. (NOLA.com, http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/hearings_bp_representa… ) 15. The United States Coast Guard, an arm of the US Military under the control of the commander-in-chief, President Obama, has become severely compromised. It has now been “rented out” to BP, who is using it as a private security detail/bully force in the region, using intimidation, cover-ups, lies, as weapons, and not allowing media to remotely come close to any BP workers in the region. The Coast Guard is also directly and indirectly involved in turning away foreign aid, as well as PRIVATE and STATE entities which are proven to help more effectively in preventing damage to their coastlines. http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0617/expert-bp-running-gulf-prison-warden/ 16. There has been LITTLE TO NO response on the part of environmental groups and agencies regarding the damage that is being done to the ecosystem and environment in the region. This can only be regarded as suspicious. One can only wonder why they have not only remained silent, but they have praised the Obama administration’s actions. 17. We know that there are three poisonous gasses being released from the oil rig area. These 3 gasses are: Methane, Benzene, Hydrogen Sulfide. This does not include the byproducts of the dispersants which are also being released in the air. It is feared by many scientists and experts that benzene has the capability of igniting itself when it chemically reacts with the right concentration of gasses already present in the region. 18. With the Obama administration’s prolonging, knuckle-dragging, and delays in turning away help and aid, their actions only cause the scenario mentioned above all the more frightening. In a worst case scenario, according to scientists and other experts, the ignition of benzene would result in something akin to napalm, burning everything in its path. The US Coast Guard is following unlawful orders from President Obama in enforcing the denial of the 10th amendment to the states affected by this disaster. The Federal Government has NO AUTHORITY to tell a state how it will clean up or prevent damage to its coastline. It is also imperative that the governors of all states affected convene an emergency, [cont] You might click on the link and send a letter to your reps, if you still believe your voice matters. added by: samantha420

Brazilian waxing nearly cost UK man his nuts

GAME-for-a-laugh Joe Cooper was left in agony after a bikini waxing by mates in a PUB went wrong. One of the strips stuck to a very sensitive spot – and an over-energetic tug tore off SIX of his seven layers of skin. Doctors told steel erector Joe he had come within half an inch of losing a testicle. Joe, 24, and ten male pals had agreed to have the usually girls-only beauty therapy to raise cash for a local hospital. But all the others just had their chests waxed, while Joe endured the “male Brazilian”. Onlookers placed bids to pull the strips off in the charity event at The Trees pub in Birstall, Leicester. Joe said: “The other blokes wimped out but I said I'd do it. “I lay down and closed my eyes and the next thing I know I'm in horrendous pain and bleeding. I've never known pain like it. Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3017351/Brazilian-nearly-cost-me-my-nu… http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3017351/Brazilian-nearly-cost-me-my-nu… added by: unimatrix0

Gisele Bundchen in a Bikini: Yup, Still Gorgeous!

Gisele Bundchen looks great in a bikini. You know. In case you were wondering. We’re here to clear up these burning questions and resolve things for you. Seriously, though, how does she do it? The supermodel flaunts her supermom figure in Calzedonia’s new swimwear campaign, having recently had a kid! In case you’re wondering what happened, the Brazilian beauty told Vogue back in April her simple plan for keeping off the weight, post- baby Benjamin … “I think a lot of people get pregnant and decide they can turn into garbage disposals. I was mindful about what I ate, and I gained only 30 pounds.” Women everywhere might want to kill her right about now. Gisele may or may not be of this world .

Follow this link:
Gisele Bundchen in a Bikini: Yup, Still Gorgeous!

Sabrina Jales Height Bio

Biography for Sabrina Jales Nationality: Brazilian Hair Color: Brown Eye Color: Brown Date of Birth: September 9 Place of Birth: São Paulo, Brazil Height: 5#39;10″ ; 178cm Measurements: (US) 33-24-35 ; (EU) 84-61-89 Dress Size: (US) 6 ; (EU) 36 Shoe Size: (US) 8.5 ; (EU) 39 ; (UK) 6 Mother agency: unknown Agencies: * Ace Models * Mega Model Agency – Hamburg * Mega Models – Miami * Mega Models – Sao Paulo * Next Model Management – New York * Satoru Japan Inc Advertiseme

Read this article:
Sabrina Jales Height Bio

Dancing Brazil Baby Does A Mean Samba

This Brazilian baby can do a mean sambain a new viral YouTube video. Brazil’s Baby Dancarino video goes has gone viral leaving other important topics to the margins. He’s taking the internet by storm, and his moves are so good that many are beginning to question its authenticity. http://www.theblogismine.com/2010/06/18/dancing-brazil-baby-does-a-mean-samba/ added by: theblogismine

Courtney Lawes can be the heir to the talented Mr Ripley

The Northampton second-row has been waiting patiently for his chance to start for England and is ready to rampage tomorrow It would be a fitting tribute if England could mark the passing of one of their greatest rugby men with a stirring win over the Wallabies. Andy Ripley really was a man in a billion, an inspiration even to those who never saw him rampaging around Twickenham in his prime. That the English game has not produced a more thrillingly athletic forward before or since simply magnifies the huge sense of loss. Not once did the concept of damage limitation enter Ripley’s Corinthian soul, an approach the modern-day England side could do worse than embrace. Maybe Martin Johnson has arrived at the same conclusion, hence the belated decision to select Courtney Lawes for his first Test start. If there is a new age giant out there capable of generating an equal frisson with ball in hand as his head-banded, hippie-loving predecessor, the 21-year-old Lawes could just be the man. Theoretically Lawes is supposed to be a second-row, all grunt and close-quarter grind. Yet England also need ball carriers capable of knocking opponents backwards and blasting holes in the defensive line for their support runners to exploit. Eighteen months ago the word was already on the grapevine that Northampton had unearthed a gem with a spectacular mix of muscularity and momentum. And then nothing. Picked in England’s autumn squad the pretender has had to wait an intensely frustrating nine months for a start. If he has a stormer tomorrow, Lawes can justly claim to have fought his coaches’ innate conservatism and won. The player is aching to have a crack. The shy lad of last autumn, whose confidence slipped away either side of Christmas as he stumbled between the two stools of thwarted national ambition and club graft, has been replaced by a 6ft 7in tall, 18st hard nut, determined to reach out and seize the day. “I definitely feel ready. I feel very confident in myself and I’ve got a lot of support from the boys and the coaches. I was a little disappointed not to play during the Six Nations and lost my form a bit. But that’s fine if you pick yourself up again, which I have done. I’m looking to make an impact throughout the game: win my lineouts, make my tackles and get the ball in hand as much as possible.” There is a physical edge to Lawes that suggests he will be more than prepared to stand toe to toe with the experienced Nathan Sharpe and Rocky Elsom who, along with David Pocock, dominated the contact areas in Perth. There is already sufficient evidence of Lawes’s tackling strength to make opponents think twice and his capacity for punishment is bottomless. “I’ve never been too concerned about my body, to be honest,” he said this week. “I like making big tackles but so do most people. They’re pretty satisfying but I’m not a dirty player. If they want to get under my skin that’s fair enough. I’ll just try and hurt them legally.” If he speaks with the zeal of a relatively late convert it is because mini-rugby passed him by. Hailing from an Anglo-Jamaican background, he grew up in Northampton after his father, Linford, moved the family from Hackney when Courtney was four. Home was a few hundred yards from Franklin’s Gardens and he used to accompany his dad, a bouncer at a local pub, to martial arts training. Only in his teens at Northampton School for Boys did he sample rugby, eventually joining the Old Scouts club, which also produced Ben Cohen and Steve Thompson. A Northampton club stalwart, Lennie Newman, recalls going to watch his own son play and being deeply impressed by a gangling 17-year-old in the same team. “I remember thinking ‘Blimey, this guy is big’ but he was good as well. There was something special about him, and his physical size gave him that edge.” Winning the man-of-the-match award against Munster last October, when he stood firm against the Irish Lions Paul O’Connell and Donncha O’Callaghan, was another significant milestone yet Johnson, perhaps recalling how he felt when he was lobbed into international rugby as a 22-year-old, was determined not to rush him. But Simon Shaw will be 37 in September and time is pressing. Lawes, who can also operate on the blindside flank, is visibly delighted to be escaping bench duty. “You’ve got enough time to really make a difference in a game … you can do a lot more in 80 minutes than you can in 15. Playing against good sides also makes you raise your game and you can see how far you have to push yourself.” Lawes, in short, has the big-match appetite and the temperament necessary at this level. His appropriately long arms have earned him the name “Spider” but the Wallabies offer a physical and a mental test. “The more I can learn the better I’m going to get. I’ve got a bit wiser. I know how to get into the game and make a bigger impact. I know where to go to make the tackles and where to get the ball. It’s been a tough tour but we’re ready.” Ripley never had a koi carp tattooed on one arm or Maori tribal markings on the other but he would have admired the unflinching young dude hoping to create a little lawful disorder tomorrow. England rugby union team Rugby union Australia rugby union team Robert Kitson guardian.co.uk

Read this article:
Courtney Lawes can be the heir to the talented Mr Ripley

Miroslav Klose’s red card crucial as Serbia fail to hand it to Germany | David Hytner

Alberto Undiano’s decision to send off Germany’s Miroslav Klose against Serbia was harsh. Anyone for netball? Miroslav Klose is the man who saves his best for the world stage. Impotent for Bayern Munich over the course of this past season, the striker flicked the switch in Germany’s opening group game against Australia, scoring his 11th goal at World Cup finals to close in on the Brazilian Ronaldo’s record of 15. Onwards and upwards, everyone predicted, with Germany widely fancied. Yet he and his team were stopped brutally in their tracks here. Klose’s red card was one of those moments that had eyes widening and mouths opening all around the stadium. Already on a booking for a trip on Branislav Ivanovic, as the Serb had burst out of defence, Klose’s challenge on Dejan Stankovic was nothing more than a nibble at ankles. Yes, it was a foul, but a second yellow card? Stanovic was not about to spark a Serbian attack and there was certainly nothing nasty in Klose’s intent. But you knew that the referee Alberto Undiano was going to do it by the way that he rushed in. • Follow the Guardian’s World Cup team on Twitter • Sign up to play our great Fantasy Football game • Stats centre: Get the lowdown on every player • The latest team-by-team news, features and more The Spaniard had possibly made a rod for his own back by dishing out five yellow cards in the first 32 minutes but his application of the strictest letter of the law drew gasps. The Germany players, it ought to be said, were commendably restrained in their protests. What will they make of the decision at the referees’ headquarters in Pretoria? Each of the four-strong teams of officials from the various nations are based there and, after every performance, there is an extensive debrief involving them all. Could it be that the furore over Cristiano Ronaldo’s call for greater protection had an influence? The consensus here was that if Klose’s second card were merited, football would be entering the realms of non-contact sports. Anyone for netball? The World Cup had so far been notable for an absence of controversy. Undiano appeared keen to compensate and, as he continued to keep the whistle to his lips in the second half, so the blood pressure of the Germany manager, Jogi Löw, rose. At full time, Löw marched straight off down the tunnel, gesturing angrily. The dismissal shaped the game, although it should not detract from an encouraging performance from Serbia, whose football was compact, committed and laced with no little enterprise. Their three starting midfielders held a narrow line, with the captain, Stankovic, in the middle, ever available for the short ball out of defence. On the flanks, Milos Krasic and the new Liverpool signing Milan Jovanovic impressed, Krasic particularly so. The CSKA Moscow winger is a summer transfer target for Juventus and he would have added to his value. His crosses and trickery were a delight. Serbia sometimes offer the impression that their finger is never far from the self-destruct button. The vital penalty that Zdravko Kuzmanovic conceded for handball in their opening game defeat against Ghana was utterly needless and Nemanja Vidic, inexplicably, aped his team-mate to concede another one. Mercifully for Serbia, Vladimir Stojkovic saved Lukas Podolski’s 60th minute kick. Germany showed great character with 10 men and Löw the boldness to chase the game with attacking substitutions. But his players, as they diced with conceding a second on the counter, could not fashion the equaliser. Löw was keen not to turn his team’s final group game, against Ghana on Wednesday, into a drama. Thanks in part to Undiano, he has been denied his wish. Germany Serbia World Cup 2010 Group D World Cup 2010 David Hytner guardian.co.uk

Read the original post:
Miroslav Klose’s red card crucial as Serbia fail to hand it to Germany | David Hytner

Sky Sports News to go pay-only

BSkyB to pull channel off Freeview after eight years as it prepares to launch HD service BSkyB is to pull Sky Sports News from Freeview in a bid to drive subscription revenues, ending eight years of free-to-air broadcasting of the channel. BSkyB, which launched Sky Sports News on Freeview in 2002 alongside Sky News and Sky Travel, is to replace the channel with a one-hour-timeshifted Sky 3 +1 service later this year. Sky 3 replaced Sky Travel in 2005. The move marks a significant shift in BSkyB’s attitude to the benefits of using the reach of the free-to-air service as a marketing channel to attract subscribers to its pay-TV service. Despite the Sky Sports News service benefiting from ad revenues on the Freeview platform it is thought that BSkyB has decided that over the long term there is more advantage to be had from taking it completely subscription only. As part of the move, BSkyB is to boost editorial investment in Sky Sports News as it prepares to launch a high definition service. It is understood that the investment, which is not likely to include large numbers of staff hirings, will include new facilities and equipment such as outside broadcast trucks and a commitment to cover a wider range of sports. When the service becomes pay-only it will be available on Sky, Virgin Media and Talk Talk TV. “As part of a subscription service, customers can look forward to expanded coverage and the launch of Europe’s first HD sports news service,” said the Sky Sports managing director, Barney Francis. BskyB will pick up a fourth slot on Freeview when it takes over the Virgin 1 channel, assuming regulatory clearance is given to its £160m takeover of Virgin Media Television’s channels . BSkyB did not buy the licence to continue to operate the Virgin 1 name. Last month BSkyB moved to streamline its Sky News sports operation to share more output with the Sky Sports News operation . •

Here is the original post:
Sky Sports News to go pay-only