Tag Archives: Breaking News

ABC News Prominently Features ‘Gay-Friendly’ McDonald’s Ad Airing In France

Is ABC News trying to position itself as the go to place for gay rights advocacy amongst the broadcast network websites? Ten days after featuring a video of a gay prom king and queen, the website prominently displayed a gay-themed McDonald’s ad. The video first appeared Monday with the title “McDonald’s Ad You Won’t See in the U.S: A fast-food commercial with a gay-friendly story is only airing in France.”  The website followed this up Tuesday with a piece headlined “Gay Group: Don’t Trust McDonald’s Commercial” (video follows with quotes from article and commentary): A gay business advocacy group is charging McDonald’s with hypocrisy after the global fast food giant aired a gay-themed commercial in France.  “They were looking to portray themselves as an advocate of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) community or an ally … when it was completely counter to what their actions here in the U.S. were,” said Justin Nelson, the president and co-founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. “It’s completely hypocritical.”   Contrary to some online reports, Nelson said the NGLCC isn’t offended that the commercial won’t be broadcast on U.S. airwaves — it’s frustrated that it was broadcast at all, given McDonald’s recent history with the NGLCC.  For McDonald’s to “continue to distance themselves (from the gay community) here in the states and run an ad like that in another country — it just seemed to be a double standard or double speak,” he said. This, combined with the French commercial, led the chamber to send an angry letter, dated June 3, to McDonald’s vice chairman and CEO James Skinner. The letter dismissed the ad as “blatant geographic pandering” and called on McDonald’s to “show suppport for LGBT people, our families and our businesses — not just where it is politcally expedient, but around the globe.”  What is ABCNews.com telling us with all this gay rights activism? 

Read the original here:
ABC News Prominently Features ‘Gay-Friendly’ McDonald’s Ad Airing In France

Col. Jack Jacobs: Most In Military Will Say McChrystal ‘Was Right’

Contessa Brewer got a lot more than she was likely looking for when she interviewed Col. Jack Jacobs this afternoon about the McChrystal situation.  The MSNBC host wanted to focus on the impropriety of McChrystal publicly airing his criticisms of Pres. Obama and others in the chain of command.   But while the Medal of Honor recipient readily agreed that McChrystal was out of line, and would probably pay with his job, Jacobs also went out of his way—twice—to add an inconvenient truth: that when it comes to the substance of the criticism, most in the military think McChrystal “was right.” CONTESSA BREWER: It’s about the sort of disdain for authority. And that worries me. JACK JACOBS: Well it sure worry you, and I think he’s going to wind up getting fired because of that; at least partially because of that. BREWER: But is his view not only about the President but about Joe Biden, about Jim Jones, the National Security advisor, about Karl Eikenberry [US ambassador to Afghanistan], on and on down the list: Richard Holbrooke — JACOBS: Those views are very widely held , by the way, inside the military and outside the military, about those people. That they’re ineffective, that Jim Jones, the National Security Advisor, does not have an impact on national security policy, that he has very little access. That Holbrooke hasn’t done anything and so on.  Those views are widely held. They’re not just held by McChrystal’s staff for example. Contessa didn’t respond to Jacobs’ startling assertion.  And when a bit later she closed with more concerns about respecting the chain of command, the colonel took a tough parting shot. BREWER: There are hundreds of thousands of enlisted men and women in the military who are taught not to question authority; they don’t go outside their chain of command.  what kind of message does this send to people at the lower levels in the military? JACOBS: Well, it’s not a very one. But let me tell you what’s going to happen.  Gen. McChrystal can’t stay in his position.  He’s probably going to tender his resignation, and it’s probably going to be accepted–or demanded in the first place.  He might stay.  There are certain circumstances in which he might stay.  Likely as not he is going to be gone, and he’s probably going to wind up retiring. And in the end, this is what the rank and file of military establishment is going to say, privately.  They’re going to say: absolutely right: you can’t do this, you can’t countenance your subordinates speak to the press and say that the rest of the chain of command above you are a bunch of knuckleheads. But they’re going to say: you know what?  He was right.

View post:
Col. Jack Jacobs: Most In Military Will Say McChrystal ‘Was Right’

After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Keith Olbermann just couldn’t stay mad at the radical leftists at the Daily Kos. Six days after walking away in a huff, the MSNBC host returned to his spot on the blog on Tuesday morning, with the headline “So, uh, this looks like a nice site.” He began: “OK, I’m back.” I’ve always liked to invent backstories behind cliches and one of my oldest ones is the idea that the first guy who said “You can’t see the forest for the trees” was actually running through a forest when he ran head first into a tree and didn’t enjoy the experience. You do tend to swear at the trees, and, if you hit your head hard enough, you might even swear off that particular forest for awhile. Olbermann claimed to be delighted that responses to his “I’m out of here” blog entry brought a wide spectrum of opinion, and that perhaps he had a new thought buried beneath his self-admitted daily pomposity:  It occurs to me, in the full flower of the pomposity that always strikes me at midday, that this might be somewhat metaphorical for progressives and other centrists, particularly relative to criticism of the Administration. I was reminded of this last night when somebody asked me why I wasn’t pounding the President more on Afghanistan, and I linked him the Comment I did last year saying Obama should declare victory and go home. “Sure,” the guy replied, “you’ve been critical of that, once, but you seem to go lightly on them.” And I said, you’re right…other than this stuff about the BP disaster, and the Public Option, and the political strategy on Health Care Reform, and Afghanistan, and not prosecuting torture, and the Kagan nomination, and maybe six dozen complaints about process or tone. I mention this because the last diary was misinterpreted by 99% of the old media and 99.5% of the new media. I didn’t ‘quit Daily Kos because I got criticized for criticizing POTUS.’ I wrote what I wrote because there was a body of us here which assumed any criticism of this administration had to originate in a nefarious and wholly nugatory plan to destroy it. There certainly are such nefarious and wholly nugatory plans, active, this very minute: The most prominent is called the Republican Party (GOBP). Meanwhile, one group of progressives/liberals/Democrats has assumed no such conspiracy theory, demanded no purity test, and taken no instant and farfetched umbrage. These are the individuals known as the Obama Administration. I haven’t been in contact with anybody there since my comments on the President’s speech, but I sure as hell was in contact with them after every single one of the criticisms I mentioned above. Nobody ever called me up to complain. Nobody ever called me up to dissuade. Nobody schmoozed me, and nobody threatened me. They seem to assume it comes with the job. And they correctly assume that if I’m critical of them, they’re entitled to be critical of my criticism. This differs from the previous occupants of the White House in more ways than this site has members and lurkers and trolls combined. You will recall that every criticism of Bush was a plot to destroy America. Criticism of Obama is…democracy. That’s funny. Keith usually suggests criticism of Obama is….racist. Olbermann apologized for his wounded ago, even as he’s accustomed to dishing it out at least as viciously as he takes it:  The show I do and the positions I take are under assault, every day, from every possible direction, and I’m not complaining about it: I can afford the suit of armor. I just get pissed off now and again when I’m busy dodging bazookas and somebody bounces a nine-volt battery off my shiny metal ass claiming I’m actually an agent trying to make dough the easy way. I should have laughed at the ludicrousness of the idea. I didn’t. Sometimes it gets sweaty inside the armor. I’m not given to rash decisions (and when I say “I’m not,” of course I mean, “I am.”)

Go here to read the rest:
After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Svenja Parotat height bio

Biography for Svenja Parotat Born: 09 June 2005 Where: Germany Height: 180 cm Bust: 88 cm Waist: 59 cm Hips: 88 cm Svenja Parotat movies: Agencies: Elite Amsterdam Chic Sydney Munich Models Model Management Hamburg Next London Elite Milan Elite New York Elite Paris

Continue reading here:
Svenja Parotat height bio

Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

It’s one thing for media liberals to suggest the Tea Party is on the fringe of the right, but when it’s another when they starting putting Ronald Reagan in the center by comparison (even as Governor of California). On The Rachel Maddow Show on Tuesday, Matthews suggested that somehow America is reliably centrist, so even Reagan moved to moderation (and there’s no mention of Obama’s left-wing surge): But the American people have sort of a gyroscope, something that always brings them back to center, where it very much — and nobody wants to hear this on the right, but we’re very much like France in that way. We`re not an ideologically proletarian country or right-wing militarist country. Generally, we listen to those voices and we never go further right than Reagan, and the minute he got into office, he moved very much to the center. As governor of California, for example, on issues like abortion rights. He moved to the center. I don’t think we are an extremist country, but these voices are frightening. And at a time of economic desperation, if you will, they’re being listened to. But the one ironic — I don’t want to call it silver lining – the one whisper of possible good coming out of this horror in the Gulf of Mexico, what is really hurting North America, the love we have for this part of the world, our own part of the world, is that maybe it convinces people that government is important. Matthews smeared the Tea Party together with every fringy right-wing cause in American history: MATTHEWS: You hear it from the tea party people. You see them with the Gadsden flag, “Don`t tread on me.” You hear it from the militia, from the birthers, from the patriot groups, the oath takers — the oath keepers. They all have one resonant statement. `The United States has been taken over by a foreign power. There’s a tyranny in Washington. It`s illegitimate. It’s led by a person who`s not an American. He may be a Muslim. He may be a Nazi.’ whatever. It’s not America. Anything goes. And by the way, when you resort to the Second Amendment to take out your government officials, can you go any further than that? I wonder. MADDOW: You know, seeing the way that you juxtaposed that historical clip that we just played with, for example, the birthers, and when you draw those connections with them all thinking there`s some foreign and illegitimate power that needs to be – that`s usurping legitimate American authority, it just reminds me that there’s a lot to the ‘Communists in the State Department’ stuff that sounds like the Kenyan in the White House stuff. Isn`t it sort of, can it be the same hot buttons for Americans, can they work? MATTHEWS: No, of course, it’s there. It’s the paranoid history of America. I always like to tell this to people who care about America, like your audience. There`s two armies that march almost side by side through American history. There’s the progressive army that led for abolition, that fought the Civil War, the good guys of the Civil War. And of course, those who really pushed for reconstruction afterwards like Thaddeus Stevens and the good guys, the radical Republicans of that day. And alongside is this other army, the know-nothings and then the Klansmen who came along later. And then, you`ve got in the 20th century – it’s the same pattern – it’s the progressives moving a step or two ahead of this reactionary army that rides right along them, sort of camp followers playing off the dispossessed, those who resent change. It’s same with sexual orientation today. There`s always going to be another group growing along saying this threatens traditional marriage. This threatens something here. Matthews talk of the centrist “gyroscope” came right after more of his optimistic preaching about how Democrats will pull out some of these congressional races: I think Charlie Crist, having been pushed out of the Republican Party in Florida basically for hugging Barack Obama – let’s face it – might well win down there. I think he will. I think Marco Rubio is going to fade as a candidate. I think Sharron Angle, with the statements coming out now about using the Second Amendment right, which is a right in the Constitution. It`s written there, as a way of taking on your government and bringing it down. I think that`s going to scare you. Nevada is not a right wing state. Nevada is kind of a purple state. I think Harry Reid is now back in the saddle. So I think Joe Sestak is going to win. I don’t think Pat Toomey is consistent with Pennsylvania sort of center right and center left history. So we`ll see. …I think Rand Paul could lose. But we’ll have to see. I don’t know. I think this is a bad year for progressives. It`s a tough economy, and you’re always blamed if you’re in power.

See the original post here:
Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

It sure is a sign of the times when one of the most disgraceful and unashamedly liberal personalities in the television news industry wins an award for “excellence in electronic journalism.” Despite the seeming incongruity, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann won an Edward R. Murrow award Wednesday from the Radio Television Digital News Association. So what did Olbermann win for you ask? Writing the following tribute to his mother which aired on “Countdown” shortly after her death last year (video follows with commentary): In fairness to Olbermann, it was indeed a charming segment about her love for the game of baseball, though not surprisingly self-aggrandizing like virtually everything he does on and off the air. Of particular note was a video clip he showed of an interview he did with his mother after she was hit by a ball at a game at Yankee stadium on June 17, 2000. At the time he was working for Fox Sports. Readers are encouraged to forward to minute 3:45 when Olbermann asks his mother, “Have you been surprised by all the newspaper attention?” Her response told viewers everything they needed to know about the MSNBCer’s ego, “A little bit, but I want to know why they keep mentioning you!”  Delicious. In the end, as much as I find Keith Olbermann to be a disgusting caricature of what television journalism has degraded to in the past decade, this was certainly a touching tribute to his mother who in 2009, without any warning or apparent symptoms, died two weeks after being diagnosed with terminal cancer. I can imagine the pain he must have been going through at the time, and how difficult it was to get through those seven minutes without shedding a tear. Nice job, Keith.   That said, was this the best-written piece of electronic journalism last year, or did the folks at RTDNA get swept away by the emotional tug at the heartstrings? After all, 2009 was an eventful year what with America inaugurating its first black president, Tea parties breaking out all over the country, members of Congress getting verbally abused at town hall meetings, and the economy coming back from the brink of a depression. With this in mind, was one anchorman’s on air tribute to HIS mother REALLY worthy of such a commendation?   Before you answer, consider that NBC and MSNBC won more Murrow awards this year than any other news outlet. Any questions? 

The rest is here:
Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

Goooooooooaaaal!…Goal…goal…

Maybe he just doesn’t understand the object of the game.

Follow this link:
Goooooooooaaaal!…Goal…goal…

Kim Kang Woo profile (Korean actor)

Profile for Kim Kang Woo Kim Kang-woo (born 11 July 1978) is a South Korean actor. * Name: 김강우 / Kim Kang Woo (Kim Kang Wu) * Profession: Actor * Birthdate: 1978-Jul-11 * Birthplace: South Korea * Height: 180cm * Weight: 70kg * Star sign: Cancer * Talent agency: [1] * Debut: 2002 The Coast Guard TV Series * A Man#39;s Story (KBS2, 2009) * Bicheonmu (SBS, 2008) * Three Leaf Clover (SBS, 2005) * Breathless (MBC, 2003) * Wuri#39;s Family (MBC, 2001) Movies * HaHaHa (2009) * Five Senses of Er

See the rest here:
Kim Kang Woo profile (Korean actor)

Jenna Pietersen swimwear photos

Jenna Pietersen is a stunning lingerie and swimsuit model from South Africa. Though she’s barely in her twenties, Jenna has already been featured in the South African edition of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue two times (2006,2007). * First Name: Jenna * Last Name: Pietersen * Nationality: South African * Height: 5′ 11″ (180cm) * Measurements: 34-25.5-35.5

Originally posted here:
Jenna Pietersen swimwear photos

Megan Fox corset picture

Megan Fox tells Britain#39;s The Sun, “They (bosses) never wanted to suck me in all the way because they were worried it was going to be too tight. They were concerned I was going to faint. But I always wanted it as tight as it would possibly go. I liked it – it was kind of empowering, to be truthful.” The real buzz behind action-thriller Jonah Hex (out June 18) doesn#39;t involve the stylized shootouts: It involves Megan Fox#39;s waistline. In the DC Comics adaptation, Fox, 24 — who plays th

Original post:
Megan Fox corset picture