Tag Archives: case

Conrad Murray Not Expected To Serve Full Four Years

Legal expert Mike Cavalluzzi tells MTV News he isn’t surprised by sentence but doesn’t think it’s justified. By Gil Kaufman Dr. Conrad Murray in court on Tuesday Photo: Mario Anzuoni-Pool/ Getty Images Though he dodged a potential four-year prison term, former Michael Jackson physician Conrad Murray was sentenced to an equal amount of time in Los Angeles County Jail on Tuesday (November 29) in the death of the pop singer. But the same overcrowding problems that spared the cardiologist from doing time in a federal pen might also save him from serving his entire sentence in county as well. Shortly after the sentence was handed down by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor, Los Angeles Sheriff spokesman Steve Whitmore told E! News that Murray would likely end up serving “a little less than two years.” Due to overcrowding, most county jail sentences are immediately cut in half, and given the 46 days credit Murray has already been given, he is looking at even less than that. Do you think Conrad Murray deserved the maximum sentence? Let us know on Facebook. Murray’s lawyers said afterward that they believed the sentence was unnecessarily long. “Yes, of course [Judge Pastor] was harsh. He gave the stiffest penalty he was entitled to give under the law,” Murray’s attorney, J. Michael Flanagan, told reporters. “He was openly hostile. … [Murray has] led 56 years of exemplary life. He was really dreading [sentencing]. I think anybody would dread going into it. He’s an honorable man, and he’ll get through this. The family is suffering more than Dr. Murray is. … Dr. Murray is the provider in that family.” Pastor had leeway in the sentencing, with options ranging from probation to the full sentence, but in a lengthy ruling from the bench, he said Murray’s lack of remorse and negligent behavior called for the highest possible penalty. “He is and remains dangerous … the request of probation is denied, the court imposes the high term of four years imprisonment in this case,” Pastor said during the 90-plus-minute hearing. Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney Mike Cavalluzzi told MTV News that he wasn’t surprised by the sentencing but that he didn’t believe it was justified. Cavalluzzi said Pastor had incentive to give the full sentence because of the prominence of Jackson and his family and to create the perception that he is tough on crime. “He gets that perception by sentencing him to the max while not having to surrender the defendant to the full sentence,” said Cavalluzzi, who was not involved in the case. “He gets the self-satisfaction of being perceived as being tough on crime and making the Jackson family happy, but I don’t think it was a fair sentence.” Cavalluzzi said when deciding prison versus probation, judges have to look at someone’s criminal history and whether a person is likely to complete the terms of their probation, which he believes Murray would. “I’m not seeing aggravating factors here, and I think it was just a chapter in [Murray’s] life and he does not have a history of being a mercenary doctor always after money, but of being a good, responsible doctor who was seduced by the celebrity and money that Jackson offered,” he said. As to why Pastor gave such a dramatic, lengthy explanation for why he was sentencing Murray to the max, Cavalluzzi said the judge has to have a justification for his actions in the public record. “Because he doesn’t have the discretion to give a high prison term, [Pastor] has to justify his sentence in the record and have very specific reasons for it. I don’t think there’s any way that anyone truly believes that from this day forward Dr. Murray truly represents a threat to society. That’s just ludicrous.” And while he doesn’t agree with the four-year term, Cavalluzzi said the high-profile nature of the case and the glare of the media could have played into the sentence. “It probably gives [ Jackson’s family ] great comfort to have someone to blame,” he said. “‘If not for this awful man, my son, brother, father would be alive.’ But it’s not fair to do that and it feels like a capitulating judgment in favor of feeding the emotional needs of the family.” Upon leaving the courthouse, Michael’s brother Jermaine, when asked if the four-year sentence was enough, shook his head and said, “No.” Mother Katherine Jackson told local TV station KTLA, “Four years is not enough for someone’s life. It won’t bring him back. But at least he got the maximum, and I thought the judge was very, very fair.” The prosecution, however, was satisfied with the ruling. “We’re pleased. That’s what we thought was appropriate. The judge obviously agreed with us,” deputy district attorney David Walgren said. “It was our position that it was not a simple, one-time mistake; it was a series of mistakes culminating in the abandonment of Michael Jackson when he died … the judge agreed with that sentiment. A brother and a son and a family member was killed, and whatever the sentence may be, the family of the victim deserves justice. And we did everything to bring them that justice.” As for how much time Murray will spend locked up, Cavalluzzi said it is likely to be less than two years and, frankly, he predicted, the doctor could be out even sooner than that. “He might be eligible for house arrest very quickly,” he said. Related Videos Michael Jackson Doctor Conrad Murray Sentenced Related Artists Michael Jackson

Read the original post:
Conrad Murray Not Expected To Serve Full Four Years

Conrad Murray’s Lawyers Planning Appeal

Michael Jackson doctor convicted of involuntary manslaughter on Monday. By Gil Kaufman Dr. Conrad Murray Photo: Al Seib/Pool/Getty Images The lawyers for Conrad Murray are planning to lodge an appeal on behalf of Michael Jackson ‘s former doctor. Murray, who was immediately sent to jail on Monday following his conviction on a single felony charge is being housed in a part of the Los Angeles County jail set aside for high-profile prisoners. According to CNN , Murray’s defense team has promised to appeal the conviction, but not before they prepare for his upcoming sentencing hearing on November 29. Defense attorney Nareg Gourjian said that Murray was “devastated” by the guilty verdict, but he is “confident” that he will win release on appeal. “What matters most right now is trying to keep Dr. Murray from taking up a prison cell in this community,” lead defense lawyer Ed Chernoff said. “That’s what we’re focusing on right now and we’ll deal with an appeal after that.” Though Murray is facing up to four years in state prison on the charge, because of recent changes in sentencing laws in California aimed at reducing prison overcrowding, he is unlikely to spend any time in a state facility. His lawyers plan to ask for probation and Gourjian said he expects his client to spend “maybe a little bit” of time in county jail. Both lawyers said they were not surprised by the verdict but that their case was hampered by some of the pre-trial rulings that were made on evidence the defense had planned to show the jury. “I think that’s essentially what denied Dr. Murray a fair trial in this case,” Gourjian said. He suggested that the outcome may have been different if Murray’s team had been able to introduce evidence on Jackson’s past drug use and dire “financial condition.” The verdict is in on the Conrad Murray trial. Stick with MTV News for continued coverage, updates and analysis on MTVNews.com . Related Videos Michael Jackson’s Former Doctor Found Guilty Related Artists Michael Jackson

Read more:
Conrad Murray’s Lawyers Planning Appeal

Conrad Murray Verdict ‘Very Fair,’ Expert Says

‘There was so much overwhelming evidence of guilt that the defense didn’t really have much of a chance,’ Mike Cavalluzzi tells MTV News. By Kara Warner Dr. Conrad Murray reacts after the jury returned with a guilty verdict in his involuntary manslaughter trial at Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday Photo: Al Seib/ Getty Images The nearly six-week involuntary manslaughter trial against former Michael Jackson doctor Conrad Murray ended Monday afternoon (November 7) with a guilty verdict. Judge Pastor announced that Murray would be taken immediately into custody and held without bail until his sentencing hearing, scheduled for November 29. Moments after the verdict was read, MTV News spoke with Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney Mike Cavalluzzi for his expert opinion regarding Murray’s conviction on one felony count of involuntary manslaughter in the death of Michael Jackson. “I’m not at all surprised by the verdict,” said Cavalluzzi, who is not associated with this case. “I think the prosecution did an excellent job of laying out their case, and I think that there was so much overwhelming evidence of guilt that the defense didn’t really have much of a chance. This is a very fair verdict, mainly because it isn’t a verdict that calls for any intent or any malice on the part of Dr. Murray. This is about criminal negligence, gross negligence on his part, and I think it’s a fair verdict.” Cavalluzzi also wasn’t surprised by the amount of time — nine hours — it took the jury to reach their decision. “This is about how long one would think it would take given the amount of evidence the jury had to go through,” he said. “It seems to me that perhaps the jury was a little bit media savvy in coming down with their verdict the end of a Monday morning so it would be announced early Monday afternoon. It allows them to reach the full week of the news cycle and hit all the major magazines. So it seems to me like someone on that jury knew about Us [Weekly] magazine.” Looking ahead, Cavalluzzi said more jail time isn’t necessarily in Murray’s future after the November 29 sentencing. “It’s a little bit early to tell what a fair sentence would be for Dr. Murray now. That’s the most difficult part of the process for Judge Pastor, in which he will have to seriously consider all of the mitigating factors which would lean toward Dr. Murray not doing any jail time and all of the aggravating factors that would lead toward him going to state prison,” he said. “It seems to me, at first blush, that any jail time wouldn’t be appropriate in this case given the fact that Dr. Murray has no criminal record and there truly was no malice, no intent to actually harm Michael Jackson at all. What he was really doing was succumbing to the wishes of a patient, and unfortunately, that patient was not a person whose wishes should have been succumbed to.” MTV News will be covering the Conrad Murray case live. Go to MTVNews.com for breaking news, reactions and analysis from Los Angeles or tune to MTV for the latest updates. Celebrate the life and legacy of Michael Jackson tonight at 9 p.m ET/PT when VH1 presents the World Broadcast premiere of “Michael Jackson’s This Is It.” Related Videos Michael Jackson’s Former Doctor Found Guilty Related Photos Michael Jackson: A Life In Photos Related Artists Michael Jackson

View original post here:
Conrad Murray Verdict ‘Very Fair,’ Expert Says

Why Did Michael Jackson’s Doctor Talk To Police?

Before verdict is returned, we look at a turning point in the investigation of Dr. Conrad Murray. By Gil Kaufman Dr. Conrad Murray Photo: Pool/ Getty Images It was one of the most confounding decisions in the recent annals of criminal justice: Why did Dr. Conrad Murray’s lawyers counsel him to sit down for a no-holds-barred interview with police just two days after the death of Michael Jackson on June 25, 2009. The tell-all interview went against just about all the logic you’ve seen in countless movies and TV procedurals, where the potential defendant’s lawyer adamantly tells his client not to say a single thing to the cops. With the involuntary manslaughter trial of former Jackson doctor Murray in the jury’s hands, we asked a lawyer if that fateful interview was the first, and biggest, mistake Murray’s legal team made in their defense. MTV News spoke to Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Mike Cavalluzzi, who said the very first decision criminal lawyers often have to make is whether to allow their client to speak to the police before a formal prosecution against them has begun. Cavalluzzi, who does not have firsthand knowledge of the case but who has worked a range of criminal matters in L.A. courts from misdemeanor battery to homicide, said very often a defense attorney will choose to make their client clam up and not speak to police at all. “However, there is a unique advantage to be gained by allowing your client to speak to the police if you think they are going to do well,” he said of the possible reasoning behind the unusual tactic. That choice might have helped Murray during the trial, where he was able to avoid testifying and submitting himself to the rigorous cross-examination from the prosecutor because his voice had already been heard. “He has said what he needs to say, and the jury is hearing that without the prosecution having the benefit of cross-examining him,” Cavalluzzi said. “In this case, it could actually benefit him.” Then again, he added, the move was risky because at the time Murray spoke to police, the doctor’s lawyers had no idea about the state of the investigation into Jackson’s death or what evidence had been uncovered. “By the time you’re at trial, you can respond to all the evidence, as opposed to speaking to evidence you don’t know about yet,” he said. Stanford University law professor Robert Weisberg told MTV News that the decision to have Murray talk to police before they’d charged him was “pretty bizarre,” though he suspected the doctor’s lawyers had some reason for taking that step. “I always tell my students to be careful about believing what they see on ‘Law & Order,’ ” said Weisberg, who also was not directly involved in the case. “In those shows, you always have the suspect blabbing to police in the presence of their lawyer and the lawyer is trying to tell them to shut up. The first thing a lawyer does is tell them to shut up. And when they do talk to police, it’s in a highly orchestrated situation where the lawyer is present.” Though he speculated that Murray’s lawyers had thought long and hard about talking to police, Weisberg said it was still unusual. “Maybe the lawyer thought that on balance, it was a good strategy, or that it might persuade police to drop the investigation or that he would do such a good job that he wouldn’t incriminate himself,” Weisberg said. And even though the interview became one of the focal points of the prosecution’s case and provided some damaging evidence against Murray, Weisberg said that doesn’t in itself mean it was a bad idea. “It led to a lot of agonizing over whether Murray would testify, which a criminal defendant in a trial does not have to do.” Weisberg said the high drama that surrounded the announcement of whether Murray would testify near the end of the trial was also out of the ordinary. “I’m not sure why they had a virtual press conference in court announcing he was not testifying; that seemed odd to me.” Then again, it might also have been another sly legal tactic. “Maybe the defense thought it could be an emotionally poignant moment that would play with the jury,” he said. Related Artists Michael Jackson

Original post:
Why Did Michael Jackson’s Doctor Talk To Police?

Michael Jackson Doctor’s Trial Goes To Jury

Lawyers reiterate their cases in closing arguments before jury deliberations begin Friday. By Gil Kaufman and Kara Warner Dr. Conrad Murray Photo: Pool/ Getty Images Following 22 days of testimony from 49 witnesses, the closing arguments were presented Thursday (November 3) in the involuntary manslaughter trial of former Michael Jackson doctor Conrad Murray. Nearly six weeks after he kicked off the trial with a headline-grabbing image of an emaciated Jackson on a gurney following his death in June 2009, Deputy District Attorney David Walgren was first up with his closing argument. Walgren told jurors the evidence in the case was overwhelming and Murray’s actions directly led to Jackson’s death from an overdose of the surgical anesthetic propofol. “The evidence in this case is abundantly clear … that Conrad Murray caused the death of Michael Jackson, that Conrad Murray left Prince, Paris and Blanket without a father,” Walgren said of the late pop singer’s three children. The DA reminded jurors that a number of medical experts called to the stand by both prosecutors and the defense said physicians had a legal and ethical obligation to deny a patient’s request to provide medical treatment that could end up harming them. Returning to an argument the prosecution had made all along about Murray’s alleged motives for giving chronic insomniac the anesthetic, Walgren said, “Conrad Murray sought payment for services rendered, the services rendered being the provision of propofol. … Michael Jackson trusted Conrad Murray. But Conrad Murray corrupted that relationship, and for that, Michael Jackson paid with his life.” Walgren said the evidence against Murray was “overwhelming,” stating that his guilt in the matter is “abundantly clear” and that testimony from defense anesthesiology expert Dr. Paul White that blamed Jackson for giving himself fatal doses of several drugs was “junk science.” The prosecutor also reminded jurors about how they heard that Murray was speaking to one of his ex-girlfriends , cocktail waitress Sade Anding, when he realized Jackson had stopped breathing, proof that the physician was not properly monitoring the singer’s health. “Was Conrad Murray in another room? Did Michael Jackson yell out for help? Did he gasp?” Walgren asked. “Did he choke? Were there sounds? We don’t know, and we’ll never know because of the neglect and negligence of Conrad Murray.” Then it was defense attorney Ed Chernoff’s turn to present his closing argument, which included a detailed breakdown of the prosecution’s key witnesses and why their collective testimony “can’t prove [Murray committed] a crime, and they really need to prove a crime,” Chernoff told the jury. Chernoff first attempted to discredit the testimony of Michael Jackson’s bodyguard Alberto Alvarez . He said it didn’t make sense that Murray would ask Alvarez to hide evidence since the two barely knew each other and that none of his fingerprints were found on the allegedly hidden evidence. The defense then went after the L.A. County coroner’s investigator for not taking proper notes and photos, as well as not providing a proper chronology. Chernoff emphasized that out of the evidence discovered in Jackson’s bedroom, none of the tubing found had propofol in it. Chernoff also accused prosecution expert Dr. Shafer of having a biased agenda and that his simulations had nothing to do with the case. Chernoff told the jury there are two reasonable scenarios for Jackson’s death and that is the reason they should acquit. “What the [prosecution] is really asking you to do is convict Dr. Murray for the actions of Michael Jackson. Somebody has got to tell the truth. If it were anyone else other than Michael Jackson, would the doctor be here today?” he asked, reminding them that Murray’s other patients valued and appreciated the doctor’s care. Chernoff claimed Murray only wanted to help Jackson. “He was a little fish in a big dirty pond,” he said. Furthermore, Chernoff defended Murray not immediately calling 911 because he was trying to save Jackson’s life and that his attempts at CPR did not work. Chernoff cautioned the jury that there is a tremendous desire to paint Murray as the perfect villain, but that there is “no perfect villain or perfect victim.” Chernoff agreed that administering propofol in a home setting may be inappropriate but emphasized the fact that Murray never gave Jackson any illegal drugs or substances. He also asked that the jury not hold Murray responsible just because the victim was Michael Jackson. Prosecutor Walgren then took over to present the final closing arguments in the case. He reiterated that if Murray had used the proper monitoring devices or administered proper resuscitation or had not left the room, Jackson’s death “wouldn’t have happened.” “We cannot prove exactly what happened behind closed doors,” Walgren said. “Michael Jackson could give answers, but he’s dead.” Walgren reminded the jury that they know Jackson died from acute propofol intoxication and that Murray had plenty of opportunities to prevent it. “Actions speak far louder than words,” he said. “At the end of the day, the issue is not that complicated. Murray was conducting a pharmaceutical experiment in a bedroom. I ask you return with a verdict of guilty on the count of involuntary manslaughter based on his actions alone.” Judge Michael Pastor earlier instructed jurors that they had two theories they could rely on to find Murray guilty: If they believe he committed an illegal act by providing the propofol to Jackson in a negligent way, or if they believe he failed to perform his legal duty as a doctor by acting in a reckless manner that created a high risk of death. The seven-man, five-woman jury has to unanimously agree on one or the other theory. In addition to considering the testimony of medical experts who have divergent opinions on the level of care provided by Murray, Pastor asked the jury to weigh the testimony of character witnesses who attested to the physician’s generosity when weighing the verdict. The judge’s instructions were given in a standing-room-only courtroom that included several members of Jackson’s family, including his parents and siblings LaToya and Randy. Jury deliberation will begin Friday and, if convicted, Murray could face four years in prison and the loss of his medical license. Related Artists Michael Jackson

Link:
Michael Jackson Doctor’s Trial Goes To Jury

Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush: The Pre-Divorce Meeting?!?

Reggie Bush and the Miami Dolphins lost to The New York Giants, 20-17, on Sunday afternoon. But did the former number-two draft pick win back an ex-girlfriend?!? Sources tell MediaTakeOut that Bush met up with Kim Kardashian on Saturday afternoon at BAR MASA, a sushi restaurant in New York City. Kris Humphries was in Minnesota at the time and Kim was reportedly ” excited ” about seeing the man she dated for over two years. Interesting… Over the summer, tabloids claimed that Bush was frantically texting Kim , hoping she’d call off her wedding. It seemed ridiculous at the time, but, hey, the tabloids called Kim’s divorce from Kris in this case, didn’t they? Moreover, if living arrangements really were an issue for Kardashian with Humphries, they would not be in this case: Bush resides in Miami. Next to whatever red carpet event is lining her bank account, that city is Kim’s second home.

More:
Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush: The Pre-Divorce Meeting?!?

What Were You Thinking?!?!: Actors That Turned Down Roles For Movies That Made It Rain On Them Hoes!

Life is all about decisions. Sometimes those decisions are tough and we hope they work out for the best. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. In the case of these actors the decisions they made regarding their careers might have set them back in status and money. No one can totally predict if a film will do well or not, plenty of movies have been made with big name directors and huge budgets that no one ever went to see. We found several examples of these actors/actresses and decided to bring you some of the most incredible. Flip the script to see the list.

Go here to read the rest:
What Were You Thinking?!?!: Actors That Turned Down Roles For Movies That Made It Rain On Them Hoes!

Michael Jackson Overdose Re-Enacted In Court Video

Prosecution aimed to prove MJ’s death could have been prevented if Dr. Conrad Murray had the proper equipment and staffing. By Gil Kaufman Steven Shafer Photo: Pool/Getty Images After five days of recess, the involuntary manslaughter trial of Michael Jackson doctor Conrad Murray resumed in a Los Angeles courtroom Wednesday (October 19) with the airing of a dramatic video showing an actor going into cardiac arrest and being revived following a propofol overdose. The Witness

Eff A Thug: The State Of North Carolina Wants To Murk Shaniya Davis’ Killer!

We don’t generally support the death penalty but in this case we’re opposed for different reasons. We don’t think Shaniya Davis’ murderer deserves a quick clean death, instead we think a “Deliverance” style slow murking at the hands of a cellmate named Bubba with six neck rolls and a red hot sausage might be more appropriate. In any case, the fate of this heartless muhfugga should be decided very soon: A judge has cleared the way for prosecutors to seek the death penalty against the man accused of killing 5-year-old Shaniya Davis in 2009. Prosecutors, however, told Superior Court Judge Jim Ammons in a hearing this afternoon that they do not intend to seek the death penalty for her mother, Antoniette Davis, 27, who is accused of giving up her daughter to pay off a drug debt. Mario Andrette McNeill, 31, and Davis are both charged with first-degree murder in Shaniya’s death. Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty against McNeill because of two aggravating factors – that he is accused of killing Shaniya during the commission of a rape and kidnapping and that the crime was “especially heinous, atrocious and cruel,” District Attorney Billy West said. West said in court that Antoniette Davis owed McNeill a $200 drug debt and that she was unwilling to have sex with him to pay it off. Instead, she offered her 5-year-old daughter to settle the debt, he said. “This is a case of a rape and/or sex offense against a 5-year-old victim who was helpless to prevent her asphyxiation,” West said. “Her body was left in a ditch after she was asphyxiated and this was done, allegedly, by someone she knew and perhaps even trusted.” McNeill’s lawyers did not contest the prosecutors’ bid to proceed with the case as a capital trial, saying only they did not agree with the prosecution’s position. “We would like the record to show we don’t agree or concur with the DA’s aggravating factors,” defense lawyer Harold “Butch” Pope told the judge. Ammons granted the prosecution’s request to proceed with the case capitally. It sounds like this dude is about to be put to his death, we don’t see how he wouldn’t be convicted, based on the hotel security alone. Shaniya’s mom’s case is a lil more complicated though. Keep reading for details on that.

Link:
Eff A Thug: The State Of North Carolina Wants To Murk Shaniya Davis’ Killer!

Troy Davis Supporters Make Last-Minute Appeal For Death-Row Inmate

Big Boi spreads the word about protests in Georgia before Davis’ scheduled execution on Wednesday. By Gil Kaufman Protesters for Troy Davis gather in Atlanta on Tuesday Photo: Jessica McGowan/ Getty Images With his execution looming on Wednesday night (September 21), Georgia death-row inmate Troy Davis ‘ lawyers have been scrambling to piece together a last-minute appeal on his behalf. Davis has been fighting to win a clemency ruling that would spare him the death penalty for the 1989 killing of Georgia police officer Mark MacPhail, a crime he claims he did not commit. Time magazine reported that his lawyers offered on Tuesday to have him take a polygraph test if the pardons board would consider its results, and some of Davis’ supporters have suggested asking President Obama to intervene in the case, though legal experts said that was unlikely. A Georgia appeals panel refused the polygraph request on Wednesday in what has become the most high-profile death penalty case in the country in several years. A number of prominent hip-hop artists have taken up Davis’ cause, among them Diddy, ?uestlove, Killer Mike and Russell Simmons, as well as the ATL’s Big Boi. The Outkast co-founder has taken to his Twitter account to spread the word about the case and try to get the word out about a series of protests planned for Wednesday around the city. “Time to hit the streets people!!!! #Troydavis. Rally at the prison in Jackson Georgia 4:00 pm , time to be seen!!!!!” he wrote early Wednesday as part of a flurry of tweets about the topic. “Judge Penny Freezeman is apparently the only one that can stop the UNJUST execution of Troy Davis: 912-652-7252.” Boi’s account is full of retweets from other celebs weighing in, including Kim Kardashian, Diddy, writer Kevin Powell, Cedric the Entertainer and Marlon Wayans. “At this point if you’re in Atlanta or anywhere near, Jackson, Georgia, is where u need to be, out of towners can man the phones,” he wrote . MacPhail was working as a security guard at a Savannah, Georgia, Burger King in August 1989 when he tried to help a man who was being assaulted in a nearby parking lot. Davis was fingered as the assailant and during his 1991 trial a number of witnesses testified that they saw Davis shoot MacPhail, though a murder weapon and DNA evidence were never recovered from the scene. Ballistics tests showed that the fatal shot came from the same gun used in another shooting in which Davis was earlier convicted. Davis’ lawyers have argued that new ballistics tests disprove the prosecution’s case and that seven of the nine original eyewitnesses changed all or part of their testimony in later proceedings. The long-running case has garnered worldwide attention and Davis’ cause has been taken up by groups and individuals such as Amnesty International, the NAACP, former President Jimmy Carter, the Pope, civil rights leader Al Sharpton and former FBI director William Sessions, who’ve called on courts to grant Davis a hearing in light of the new evidence. Lawyer Brian Kammer also tried to file a last-minute appeal based on new ballistics evidence and allegations of misleading testimony used in the original trial to convict Davis, but legal experts predicted those efforts would also likely fail to spare his client’s life. Davis is scheduled to die by lethal injection at 7 p.m. on Wednesday. The case made it all the way to the Supreme Court last year, Davis’ lawyers failed to prove their client’s innocence. Davis has maintained his innocence all along, but prosecutors in the case have repeatedly said they feel confident that the right man was convicted. Watch ‘RapFix Live’ today at 4 pm ET on MTV.com as Big Boi and Pill discuss their protest of the Troy Davis execution with Sway. Related Artists Big Boi

See the article here:
Troy Davis Supporters Make Last-Minute Appeal For Death-Row Inmate