Tag Archives: Cbs

CBS’s Smith Excuses Obama For Not Crediting Bush With Iraq Troop Surge

On Wednesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith served as an apologist for President Obama, who failed to credit President George W. Bush with the Iraq troop surge in an Oval Office address Tuesday night: “…while he [Obama] did not acknowledge…President Bush’s support for the surge….he at least gave it tacit agreement – approval. And he has certainly approved a surge in Afghanistan.” Smith made the defense during an interview with Arizona Senator John McCain, who took the President to task for opposing the 2007 troop surge: “…it was President Bush who made the decision – over the vociferous option of the President of the United States, then Senator Obama – to do the surge. And if we had done what President Obama wanted, we would have failed in Iraq because he even voted against the funding for it.” After Smith claimed that Obama “had a year and a half to rescind” his opposition to the surge and eventually gave “tacit agreement” to it, McCain replied: “…if we had done what he wanted to do, we would have left and we would have lost and had a horrendous setback to America’s national security.” Smith moved on to Afghanistan, still skeptical of the success of the Iraq surge strategy: “If, in fact, the surge was successful in Iraq , is that – is there a lesson from that to be applied to Afghanistan now that we’ve – there are more than 320 kids have been killed in Afghanistan this year. Are the lessons of Iraq applicable to Afghanistan?” Prior to Smith’s interview with McCain, fill-in co-host Erica Hill interviewed Vice President Joe Biden. She wondered about Obama changing focus to the economy during the prime time address: “This was, though, supposed to be a speech about ending combat operations in Iraq, about the men and women currently fighting, those who have fought. Was this really the appropriate place and time to make that transition?” On Iraq, Hill questioned the stability of the security situation: “There has been increased violence, we’re hearing more and more about the sectarian divisions. Is there any concern on the part of the administration that there could be the creation of a vacuum of sorts at this point?” Hill failed to question the Vice President about his and President Obama’s opposition to the troop surge. Hill wrapped up the interview with Biden by lobbing a softball about the economy: “…you noted the fact that Democrats and Republicans should be cooperating, should be working together on the economy. As the administration does move forward, this is, of course, a major concern for the American people. What do you have in terms of planning, looking out now, to help stimulate the economy today?” Here is a full transcript of Smith’s September 1 interview with McCain: 7:10AM ET SEGMENT: HARRY SMITH: And joining us now from Phoenix is Senator John McCain. Senator, good morning. JOHN MCCAIN: Good morning. SMITH: What did you think of the speech last night? [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Taking On Obama; McCain’s Reaction to Presidential Address] MCCAIN: Well, I was – I was pleased that the President gave such well-deserved praise to the men and women who have served and those who have sacrificed. It certainly was not generous of him when he mentioned former President George Bush as one who also appreciates the military, but the fact is, that it was President Bush who made the decision – over the vociferous option of the President of the United States, then Senator Obama – to do the surge. And if we had done what President Obama wanted, we would have failed in Iraq because he even voted against the funding for it. But the thing that disturbed me the most about it is this continued repetition that we are leaving at a date certain. You don’t win conflicts when you tell the enemy you’re leaving. Our friends are accommodating, our enemies are encouraged. A Taliban captive says ‘you’ve got the watches, we’ve got the time.’ It should be conditions-based. And when those conditions are met, then we can do exactly what we’re now doing in Iraq. SMITH: You’re referring to Afghanistan now. MCCAIN: Afghanistan, yes. I’m sorry. SMITH: One of the things – but one of the things he did say in the speech last night, the pace of reductions in Afghanistan will be determined by conditions on the ground. MCCAIN: If he had stopped there, we’d be in great shape. And then he had to repeat what was purely a political decision, no military person recommended it, that we were going to go ahead and continue – or begin our, quote, ‘withdrawal,’ the middle of next year. Look, that accounts for the behavior, to some degree, of Karzai, the –  many of the things that are happening in the region, because they believe that we are leaving. Look, Harry, I was even – I talked to a police chief outside Kandahar who said, ‘yeah, we think you’re leaving and the Taliban are telling us  they’re going to cut off our heads when you do.’ All he had to do was say it’s conditions-based. SMITH: The – I think part of the subtext of the message last night was, while he did not acknowledge the President’s – prior president, President Bush’s support for the surge, I think that- MCCAIN: Or his opposition – or his vociferous opposition and his opposition throughout- SMITH: Well he also had a year and a half to rescind it. So, he at least gave it tacit agreement –  approval and he has certainly approved a surge in Afghanistan. My question is, if – is, are there- MCCAIN: Harry, if he had had his way and he won the nomination of his party opposing Hillary Clinton, who had voted for it, that was the whole basis of his campaign. And if we had done what he wanted to do, we would have left and we would have lost and had a horrendous setback to America’s national security. SMITH: Let me ask this question, then. If, in fact, the surge was successful in Iraq, is that – is there a lesson from that to be applied to Afghanistan now that we’ve – there are more than 320 kids have been killed in Afghanistan this year. Are the lessons of Iraq applicable to Afghanistan? MCCAIN: The fundamentals are. The same general who made it succeed the last time in Iraq is in charge in Afghanistan. I think he’s the finest general that I’ve had the opportunity – ever had the opportunity of being in the company of. He believes that we can succeed. But I can tell you, the commandant of the Marine Corps said recently that the announcement of beginning a withdrawal, it gives sustenance to the Taliban. I mean, you cannot win conflicts when you say that you are leaving. And again, no military person – no military person with any military background would recommend what the President did. It was a political decision. He made it to please his political base. And he should change it. And it’s wrong to put young Americans in harm’s way when you’re telling your enemies and your friends alike in the region that you’re going to be leaving. SMITH: Alright. Senator John McCain, thank you very much for your time this morning. Do appreciate it. MCCAIN: Thank you. Thank you. SMITH: Alright, good to see you. Here is a full transcript of Hill’s interview with Biden: 7:06AM SEGMENT ERICA HILL: And joining us now from Baghdad is Vice President Joe Biden. Mr. Vice President, good morning. JOE BIDEN: Good morning, Erica. HILL: The President last night, of course, said this was time to turn the page and then took that opportunity to say, and I’m quoting here, ‘our most urgent task is to restore our economy.’ This was, though, supposed to be a speech about ending combat operations in Iraq, about the men and women currently fighting, those who have fought. Was this really the appropriate place and time to make that transition? BIDEN: Yes. It was at the end of his speech. He did speak exactly about turning the page here as well. He didn’t use that phrase. He talked about ‘change the mission.’ I’m about to go to a ceremony literally in the next hour where that is taking place. And he did speak at length about the bravery and the sacrifice made by the men and women of this country. But the truth of the matter is, at the end of the day, our ability to maintain our national security is, in fact, dependent  upon the economy. And it’s time to focus on that as well. Lastly, Erica, what he was really talking about was, just as we turn the page and are cooperating as Democrats and Republicans on the issue of Iraq, we should be doing the same thing on the economy, cooperating. HILL: When it comes to Iraq, you are there – you are there right now on the ground, of course. As people look at the Iraq that we’re seeing today, the government still in flux six months after an election. There has been increased violence, we’re hearing more and more about the sectarian divisions. Is there any concern on the part of the administration that there could be the creation of a vacuum of sorts at this point? BIDEN: Well, there’s always the possibility, long term, if this goes on, creating a vacuum. But the truth of the matter is, violence is the lowest level it’s been since we arrived in 2003. Number one. Number two, the fact of the matter is, that I have been speaking with every one of the major leaders. I’ve met with every one of the groups that are – that won portions of the vote in the election. And I’m absolutely convinced that they are nearing the ability of forming a government that will be a government representing the outcome of the election, which was very much divided. There’s 325-plus members of their parliament, the largest party got 91 votes. So, it takes a while to put together this coalition. But I believe they’re close to doing that. HILL: I do want to bring you back to the economy for one second because, as you said after that first question, you noted the fact that Democrats and Republicans should be cooperating, should be working together on the economy. As the administration does move forward, this is, of course, a major concern for the American people. What do you have in terms of planning, looking out now, to help stimulate the economy today? BIDEN: Well, a continuation of what we’re doing now, which is to stimulate the economy by continuing to focus on infrastructure by giving taxes and more tax breaks to small businesses. They’re the job creators, they’re the incubators of job creation. They need the help. And by continuing the middle class tax cut so that middle class people have disposable income in order to meet their needs and, in turn, that stimulates the economy. And I hope the Republicans, when we get back, will, in fact, lift their hold on us being able to vote on a tax cut for small businesses that is tied up in the Senate. So, I just hope we begin to focus more on job creation than on – as the leader of the Republican Party, Mr. Sessions, in charge of the election – re-election of the Congress – said that what we have to do is return to exactly what we were doing before. That’s not much of an alternative. HILL: Vice President Joe Biden, thanks for joining us this morning. BIDEN: Thank you very much, Erica. Pleasure to be with you.

See more here:
CBS’s Smith Excuses Obama For Not Crediting Bush With Iraq Troop Surge

Sizing Up The Amazing Race’s 11 New Teams

The 17th edition of The Amazing Race is nearly upon us, and since the show finally lost the Reality Competition Series Emmy to Top Chef , I can feel good about liking it again. Let’s break down the 11 competing teams , assign them unfair titles, and pick a possible winner.

Continue reading here:
Sizing Up The Amazing Race’s 11 New Teams

Big Brother Repulsion Index: Penguin Costumes in Reality Purgatory

While arguing his case before last night’s surprise double eviction, Enzo stood before his houseguests while wearing a penguin costume and solemnly said, “This is not a joke.” Then he proceeded to wish his wife a happy anniversary, tell “Baby G back home” that he missed her and thank the houseguest who had given him the best “fade” (translation: haircut) in the Big Brother house. And then , the houseguests voted to keep Enzo in the house! This is reality television, folks. Click through to see which repulsive contestants made the Index this time.

See the rest here:
Big Brother Repulsion Index: Penguin Costumes in Reality Purgatory

Today Show Previews Glenn Beck Rally: Watch Out For Signs With ‘Racist Overtones’

NBC’s Tom Costello, on Friday’s Today show, in previewing Glenn Beck’s rally at the Lincoln Memorial this weekend, focused on the racial insensitivity of the Tea Partiers as he reminded NBC’s viewers that at last year’s  rally in Washington “there were a lot of signs that had rather racist overtones. The concern is that might be repeated this time. By the way, many Beck followers, who are coming, are being urged to avoid African-American areas and avoid conflict.” Costello began his story noting that while “Glenn Beck says that Dr. King is a hero of his” he is still “defiant in his right to be here” and then went on to cite political analyst Stu Rothenberg in insisting “this weekend’s event could carry risk for Republicans.” The following is the full Costello story as it was aired on the August 27 Today show: ANN CURRY: Radio and Fox News host Glenn Beck is promising a massive rally in Washington this weekend to, quote, “Restore honor in America.” He plans to do it at the same spot and on the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech and that is stirring some controversy. NBC’s Tom Costello is at the Lincoln Memorial this morning with more on this. Tom, good morning. [On screen headline: “‘Restoring Honor’ Glenn Beck’s Rally On MLK Anniversary”] TOM COSTELLO: Ann, good morning to you. And Glenn Beck says that Dr. King is a hero of his, and for that reason he will not stand on the same step that Dr. King stood on in 1963. He plans to stand a few steps below that. That said, he is defiant in his right to be here. What happened on this very spot 47 years ago tomorrow was among the most pivotal moments in American history. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.: I have a dream today. COSTELLO: But conservative host Glenn Beck also has a dream. GLENN BECK: We will mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. COSTELLO: Beck is hoping his rally this weekend will rival last year’s anti-tax rally that attracted tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people, many of them tea party activists. Increasingly Beck has been evoking the civil rights movement and says this weekend is about restoring honor in America. He also insists he did not realize it was the anniversary of the March on Washington but, he says, that shouldn’t matter. BECK: I’m sorry. African-Americans don’t own Martin Luther King. It’s a human idea just like white people don’t own George Washington or Abraham Lincoln. COSTELLO: But Beck’s comments about race have sometimes been inflammatory. BECK: This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy over and over and over again who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture. I don’t know what it is. SARAH PALIN: Do you love your freedom? COSTELLO: And joining Beck this weekend will be former Governor Sarah Palin, who last week defended talk show host Laura Schlessinger’s repeated use of the “n” word, as freedom of speech, saying it wasn’t being used in a racist manner. DR. LAURA SCHLESSINGER: And I’ll say it again *bleep* *bleep* *bleep* COSTELLO: While Beck insists this is a nonpolitical gathering, analyst Stu Rothenberg says this weekend’s event could carry risk for Republicans. STU ROTHENBERG: The Republican Party needs conservatives, needs the Tea Party activists but the Republican Party does not want to be defined by Tea Partiers or Glenn Beck. COSTELLO: Activist Reverend Al Sharpton, will also be in D.C., Saturday leading a march to mark the MLK anniversary but promises to avoid confrontation. AL SHARPTON: To go and confront him is to make it about him. That would, in my opinion and the opinion of many that are participating with us that day, would mock the memory of Dr. King. COSTELLO: So why this weekend? Beck says maybe it was meant to be. BECK: I believe in divine providence. It was not my intention it to select 8/28 because of the Martin Luther King tie. COSTELLO: Also, Beck says that he believes this is about reclaiming civil rights. Importantly, he says, they will not allow any campaign signs here at all. That may be rather tough to enforce given the scope and the size of this place. The trouble is, of course, last year there were a lot of signs that had rather racist overtones. The concern is that might be repeated this time. By the way, many Beck followers, who are coming, are being urged to avoid African-American areas and avoid conflict. Ann, back to you. CURRY: Okay. We’ll see what happens. Tom Costello, thanks a lot.

View post:
Today Show Previews Glenn Beck Rally: Watch Out For Signs With ‘Racist Overtones’

Levi Johnston Recants Apology to Palins, CBS Rewards with Four-Minute ‘Exclusive’

Continuing their obsession with the credibility-challenged Levi Johnston, whose sole claim to fame is his continuing ability to exploit his relationship with Sarah Palin’s daughter, Bristol, CBS’s The Early Show on Friday devoted more than four minutes to an “exclusive” interview with the “reality star” and how he now recants his apology for lying about the Palins in previous interviews. To her credit, correspondent Betty Nguyen challenged Johnston’s openly frivolous approach to running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska (a stunt concocted for a reality show) and whether his temporary apology was “honest” (he said it was “something I did to make my fiancee happy”). But CBS has shown a particular fetish for publicizing Johnston’s antics, especially his slams of Sarah Palin. Back in July, NewsBusters’ Kyle Drennen documented five lengthy Early Show features of Johnston, including two “exclusive” interviews, one of which aired over two days. Always, CBS touted the anti-Sarah Palin angle, as they did again today with the on-screen headline: “Levi’s Regrets; Johnston Sorry He Made Palin Apology.” As for Johnston himself, he ludicrously claimed that his interest in running for mayor of Wasilla was completely independent of the fact that it used to be Sarah Palin’s job (“I don’t care what she did or where she was at. I’m doing it because I want to”). And, just weeks after he apologized for lying about the Palin’s, he insisted that everything he’s said is true: “The only thing I wish I wouldn’t have done is put out that apology. Because it kind of makes me sound like a liar. And I’ve never lied about anything.” The only thing less credible than that is the notion that CBS is repeatedly showcasing this publicity hound for any reason other than to embarrass Sarah Palin and diminish her political clout. Here’s the transcript of the August 27 segment: 7am tease: ERICA HILL: Not sorry. In an exclusive Early Show interview, Levi Johnston opens up and says he now regrets apologizing to Sarah Palin. CLIP OF LEVI JOHNSTON: The only thing I wish I wouldn’t have done is put out that apology because it kind of makes me sound like a liar. 7:30am: ERICA HILL: First, though, we want to bring you this. You’re about to see a whole lot more of Levi Johnston, it turn out. That’s because the father of Sarah Palin’s grandson is now shooting his own reality show. He’s also, of course, running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska. Just how does he plan on pulling it all off? He talked about that and much more in an exclusive Early Show interview with CBS News correspondent Betty Nguyen. LEVI JOHNSTON, walking on a sidewalk next to Betty Nguyen: If I do win, then we’ll have to give Hollywood up for three years. BETTY NGUYEN: For now, Levi Johnston isn’t giving up the Hollywood spotlight. He got his first taste of fame during the 2008 Republican Convention when introduced as father of Bristol Palin’s baby. He’s now looking to extend his 15 minutes with a new reality show, featuring his attempt at Wasilla’s top job. [to Johnston] Do you think you’re going to win? JOHNSTON: I do, I do. NGUYEN: Why? You’ve never run for a political office before. You don’t have a high school diploma. What are your qualifications to become mayor of Wasilla? JOHNSTON: I really don’t think it’s, mayor is about qualifications. It’s really about, you know, the people liking you and believing in you. NGUYEN: But you make it sound like it’s a popularity contest. Running for mayor, that office is a serious job. JOHNSTON: Well, it’s definitely serious. You know, obviously, you want people’s votes. At the end of the day, it is kind of a popularity. Like, whoever — you know, the people love most they’ll vote for. NGUYEN: You’re well aware that Sarah Palin used to once hold that office. Did that factor in at all as to you choosing to run for mayor? JOHNSTON: I don’t care what she did or where she was at. I’m doing it because I want to. NGUYEN: Johnston and Bristol Palin announced their engagement in an “Us” weekly magazine spread last month, but just one week later it was called off after Bristol felt he was mocking her family in a music video. [to Johnston] What caused you to break off the last engagement? JOHNSTON: It was just miserable for the both of us, you know. I mean, we were constantly fighting, just trying to make it work for Tripp. It just wasn’t the right thing to do. NGUYEN: Bristol now appears to be moving on with her life. New reports say she’s signing on for her own shot at stardom. [to Johnston] I hear that she’s doing Dancing with the Stars — is that true? JOHNSTON: I recently heard that, yeah. Great. Go for it. NGUYEN: In an interview with People magazine, it was Bristol who accused Levi of ruining their relationship with his hunger for fame. [to Johnson] Bristol said that you’re obsessed with the limelight and that she was played. Is that true? JOHNSTON: I don’t think I’m any more obsessed with making a career out of this than she is. Obviously, she’s doing Dancing with the Stars. NGUYEN: You’ve posed for Playgirl, participated in a music video, now a reality show. Are you obsessed with the limelight? JOHNSTON: I wouldn’t say I’m obsessed with it. I’m just taking opportunities as they come. NGUYEN: For the past year and a half, Levi has been engaged in a public spat with Bristol’s mom, Sarah Palin, including a scathing interview published in Vanity Fair. Earlier this month, Levi publicly apologized. [to Johnston] You’ve apologized, in fact, to the Palin family, saying: “I hope to one day restore your trust.” Was that an honest apology? Do you still feel that way? JOHNSTON: That was something I did to make my fiancee happy. You know, she wanted it, so we wrote something down and we sent it out because that’s what she wanted. NGUYEN: “We wrote it down” — did she write it, or did you write it? JOHNSTON: Well, I’m not going to get into all that, but I’m just going to say, together we put it out there. NGUYEN: Well, why would you say something that’s not true if it wasn’t true? JOHNSTON: Trust me, it’s easier to make them happy, I’m telling you. You’ve got to live with them, you’ve got to make them happy. NGUYEN: Do you have any regrets? JOHNSTON: I don’t really regret anything, but the only thing I wish I wouldn’t have done is put out that apology. Because it kind of makes me sound like a liar. And I’ve never lied about anything. The rest of the stuff I can live with. NGUYEN: Betty Nguyen, CBS News, Los Angeles. HILL: Levi says he is done with marriage, at least for now, but does still hope to have more children in the future. In the meantime, he is working on earning his high school diploma and getting a team in place to advise him on just what it takes to run a city, in case he’s elected.

See the original post here:
Levi Johnston Recants Apology to Palins, CBS Rewards with Four-Minute ‘Exclusive’

Big Brother Repulsion Index: Chumscrubbing with CBS

In case you were not clear why the Repulsion Index is a fitting recap for Big Brother , let me just explain that in last night’s episode, producers handcuffed Britney to her sworn enemy for 24 hours and subjected the bound couple to hourly chum baths. Let’s see how that horror show, along with last night’s POV competition — which caged each of the houseguests like they were wild animals — shook up the Index.

See more here:
Big Brother Repulsion Index: Chumscrubbing with CBS

CBS, NBC Mourn Loss of Funding for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

A  recent court ruling  found that federal funding for embryonic stem cell research violates laws prohibiting the government from using taxpayer money for research that destroys an embryo. The ruling has sent the evening network news broadcasts reeling. While ABC’s “World News” briefly reported on the ruling Aug. 23, the NBC “Nightly News” and CBS “Evening News” have both aired reports suggesting that the ruling would end life-saving research – in spite of the fact the embryonic research can continue if privately funded, and federal funding of adult stem cell research is unaffected. NBC’s Robert Bazell reported Aug. 24 that the ruling “left a lot of researchers fairly stunned.” CBS’s Wyatt Andrews called the ruling “a shock.” But was it really? Neither report mentioned that federal funding for embryonic stem cell research was  severely restricted  under the Bush administration, and was only widened by the Obama administration  in July 2009 . Both reports also suggested that the ruling would end life-saving research. Bazell featured Dr. Chuck Murray, who is “in the delicate business of rebuilding severely damaged hearts and has tried adult and embryonic stem cells in his efforts.” The segment featured heart muscle built from embryonic stem cells, and Bazell warned that “because of yesterday’s court ruling, this research might have to stop by the end of the year.” But he didn’t mention that the rest of Dr. Murray’s research – on adult stem cells – is unaffected by the ruling. On CBS, Andrews warned the ruling “could halt a half-million dollar research project both the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins have been using to study childhood leukemia” and another studying Down syndrome. But later in the report he noted that the National Institutes of Health has said that “more than 200 existing stem cell experiments could continue for now but may not be renewed.” Andrews did note adult stem cell research is unaffected by the ruling. While both reports suggested the ruling would mean the end of promising research, they both alluded to the fact that the research will, in fact, continue – just not with taxpayer money. Private funding of embryonic stem cell research is not affected by the ruling. Both reports also included brief input from pro-life advocates and medical ethicists who praised the decision. Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by   clicking  here.

Read more:
CBS, NBC Mourn Loss of Funding for Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Letterman: Obama Will Have Plenty of Time for Vacations When His One Term Is Up

David Letterman on Tuesday took quite a swipe at Barack Obama. During the opening monologue of CBS’s “Late Show,” the host asked the audience, “You know who else is on vacation?” Letterman answered, “President Barack Obama. And this is his, since he’s been in office, this is his sixth vacation.” Then came the marvelous and surprising punch line (video follows with transcript and commentary, file photo):  DAVID LETTERMAN: You know who else is on vacation? President Barack Obama. And this is his, since he’s been in office, this is his sixth vacation. Yep, he’ll have plenty of time for vacations when his one term is up. (LAUGHTER) He’ll have plenty of time. But they’re, they’re vacationing at the beach. He’s down there with Snookie, JWoww, and the Situations. (LAUGHTER) I’m 63, I never thought I’d have to say Snookie, JWoww, and the Situations.  Wow. If Obama is losing Letterman, the end must be near. 

Follow this link:
Letterman: Obama Will Have Plenty of Time for Vacations When His One Term Is Up

Olbermann Rips ‘Racist’ Nugent for Speaking at Beck Rally He’s NOT Going To

Keith Olbermann on Friday evening once again stuck his foot in his mouth on national television when he bashed Ted Nugent for appearing at Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally next Saturday. Problem is Nugent is booked at the Boise Knitting Factory Concert House that night, and won’t be attending the Beck event. But this actually wasn’t the only fact Olbermann got wrong on MSNBC’s “Countdown,” for he also accused Nugent of making racist remarks while giving a concert in Dubuque, Iowa, a few weeks ago. Turns out that was 100 percent false as well (video follows with transcript and commentary): KEITH OLBERMANN, HOST: But our winner, Ted Nugent, former musician. He doesn`t have a call in phony advice show and he was never on anything as big as “Seinfeld,” so it has taken nearly two weeks for this to get out. At the Mississippi Moon Bar in Dubuque, Iowa, August 5th, Mr. Nugent looked out over his audience and, according to the “Dubuque Telegraph Herald” said, quote, “there is a lot of white people in this crowd. I like that. This is a white town.” Witnesses say he then pointed to at least one member of the audience and questioned that man`s race. Why would overt racism from a prominent right wing nut job and gun freak take two weeks to get national attention? Because Ted Nugent hasn`t been famous since about 1977. But here`s the punch line: one of the speakers at the Beck-apocalypse August 28th, the anniversary of Martin Luther King`s “I Have a Dream Speech” near the Lincoln Memorial? Ted Nugent. I know. I know. You thought he was dead, today`s worst person in the world. Well, Keith, according to the schedule at the Knitting Factory website, Nugent is performing there on August 28: Nice job of research there, Keith! Of course, as Tommy Christopher pointed out shortly after Olbermann’s faux pas, it appears the “Countdown” host once again blindly relied on the shills at Media Matters who wrongly wrote about this issue early Friday afternoon. Making matters worse, a photographer that was in the crowd at the Mississippi Moon Bar in Dubuque on the evening in question has flatly contradicted what Olbermann, Media Matters, and the Telegraph Herald claimed: Although the Telegraph Herald seemed to be reporting that Ted Nugent put on a racially biased show last night, what I head [sic] him say in his opening monologue was this: “Hey there sure are a lot of white people in this crowd. You need to do something about that.” He later said, heavy on the sarcasm, “Dubuque is a white town.” If anything, Nugent showed how much he honored and respected black performers of the past such as Wilson Pickett, Ray Charles, Chuck Berry and James Brown among others. He said at one point that all American soul came from these black performers who gave their blood, sweat and tears to the music. He even launched into an American Soul retrospective with songs such as Soul Man and Hey Baby. So, it appears Olbermann and the shills he foolishly allows to do his research for him got this issue totally wrong. General Electric and NBC must be so proud of their employees involved with this prime time MSNBC program!  That said, I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Olbermann to retract this nonsense next week for that requires character.

Go here to see the original:
Olbermann Rips ‘Racist’ Nugent for Speaking at Beck Rally He’s NOT Going To

Eight Years of Bias: The Liberal Media vs. the War in Iraq

The peaceful departure of the last U.S. combat forces from Iraq this week was another milestone towards the successful end of a war that many liberal journalists declared lost four years ago. Since early 2009, the war in Iraq has been a relatively low priority for the national press, which has focused on decrying the war in Afghanistan and cheerleading the Obama administration’s aggressive domestic agenda. But over the last eight years — since journalists began decrying what they termed the Bush administration’s “rush to war” in August 2002, a full seven months before the first bombs fell — the Media Research Center has analyzed TV coverage of the Iraq conflict. The bottom line: reporters were obvious skeptics from the very beginning, and did all they could to push withdrawal and defeat before George W. Bush’s surge strategy saved the day. A quick review of the media’s approach over the past eight years, with many links to the additional information that can be found at www.MRC.org: ■ Pre-War Opponents. Contrary to prevailing liberal mythology , all three networks (especially ABC) tilted their pre-war news in favor of Bush administration opponents. Covering the congressional debate over using force, for example, the networks gave a majority of soundbites (59%) to the losing anti-war side , or roughly double the percentage of Senators and Representatives who actually voted against using force (29%). Despite the claim that the media never “asked tough questions,” an MRC study of all Iraq stories on ABC’s World News Tonight during September 2002 discovered that ABC reporters were nearly four times more likely to voice doubt about the truthfulness of statements by U.S. officials than Iraqi claims.  Reporters also sanitized the “peace” movement , masking the radical affiliations of left-wing organizers while showcasing more sympathetic “middle class” demonstrators. ■ Combat Coverage. When the U.S. and its coalition partners began carefully targeted bombing of government buildings Baghdad on March 21, 2003, then-MSNBC anchor Brian Williams compared it to notorious attacks during World War II that killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians: “That vista on the lower-left looks like Dresden, it looks like some of the firebombing of Japanese cities during World War II.” Writing in the New York Times the next morning, reporter David Chen compared it to the terrorist attack on New York City : “For some, the bombing brought back particularly visceral and chilling memories. They could not help thinking about Sept. 11, and how New York, too, was once under assault from the skies.” But worst of all was NBC/MSNBC correspondent Peter Arnett , who reported lies about U.S. use of “cluster bombs” against Iraqi civilians. Arnett was later fired for denouncing the U.S. in a Saddam propaganda video just days before the regime toppled: “Clearly, the American war planners misjudged the determination of the Iraqi forces….Now America is re-appraising the battlefield, delaying the war, maybe a week, and re-writing the war plan. The first war plan has failed because of Iraqi resistance; now they are trying to write another war plan.” ■ Capture of Saddam Hussein: When the former Iraqi dictator was captured in December 2003, ABC anchor Peter Jennings sniffed that “there’s not a good deal for Iraqis to be happy about at the moment. Life is still very chaotic, beset by violence in many cases, huge shortages. In some respects, Iraqis keep telling us life is not as stable for them as it was when Saddam Hussein was in power.” For a despot who killed hundreds of thousands of his own people, the coverage was surprisingly sympathetic. “The tyrant has fallen. But for some, he’s a fallen hero ,” CBS’s Kimberly Dozer relayed. “Saddam Hussein also gave Iraqis dignity and pride. He became a symbol of defiance across the Arab world, never backing down from a fight….Those who loved him and those who hated him still can’t separate the man from the country in their minds. For many, his humiliation is their own.” ■ Waves of Bad News. In 2005, Iraq was a mixed bag — historic democratic elections, but continued violence. But an MRC study that year showed the network coverage emphasized the bad news. Out of 1,712 evening news stories, the lion’s share (848, or 61%) focused on U.S. casualties, bombings, kidnappings or political setbacks, compared to just 245 (14%) that reported positive developments. (The remainder were mixed or neutral.) An MRC study of cable news coverage in 2006 found that all three networks emphasized bad news, although the Fox News Channel aired nearly as many stories about coalition success in Iraq (81) as CNN (41) and MSNBC (47) combined. The media’s inordinately negative tone was both frustrating and perplexing to those with first-hand knowledge of the situation. On November 22, 2005, for example, the Washington Times ran a lengthy op-ed from an anonymous Marine in Iraq: “Morale among our guys is very high. They not only believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them….They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see s*** like ‘Are we losing in Iraq?’ on television.” ■ Hyping Misdeeds, Hiding Heroes. In 2006, the networks jumped on unproved charges of a Marine “massacre” at Haditha, with more than 200 minutes of coverage in three weeks. Referring to the killing of hundreds of Vietnamese civilians back in 1968, ABC’s Terry Moran wondered “Will Haditha be the My Lai of the Middle East?” But allegations of a heinous war crime have so far been unfounded: Of the eight Marines originally charged, one has been found not guilty and charges against six others have been dismissed. The trial of the last Marine, Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich , begins next month. While the networks were excited by charges of wrongdoing against U.S. servicemen, an MRC study of coverage from 2001 through 2006 found those news organizations gave just 52 minutes to the stories of America’s highest-decorated soldiers in the war on terror. Fourteen of the top 20 medal recipients up to that time had gone completely unmentioned by the broadcast networks. ■ Battling Bush’s Surge: The Bush administration’s attempt to salvage the situation in Iraq met with a blizzard of hostile coverage in January 2007. Ex-NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw scoffed that sending more troops to Iraq would “seem to most people…like a folly.” NBC’s White House reporter David Gregory suggested even White House insiders have lost faith: “As the President prepares to start a new phase of the war in Iraq, the White House is fending off charges that key figures in the administration have concluded the war is lost.” Over on CBS, correspondent Lara Logan counseled that an earlier experiment adding 12,000 troops into Baghdad “made absolutely no difference….In fact, security here in Baghdad got even worse.” The networks remained openly skeptical eight months later as General David Petraeus gave Congress his first status report on the operation. “Insurgent attacks are down,” ABC’s Terry McCarthy noted on the September 9, 2007 World News Sunday, the day before Petraeus testified before Congress. But “Iraq remains a very violent place….Life in central Iraq is still deadly dangerous.” CBS’s David Martin contended: “Victory is not at hand, not even in sight.” ■ Little Time for Good News. By late 2007, however, the surge strategy denigrated by network correspondents had borne obvious fruit. But the reaction of the broadcast evening newscasts was to begin walking away from the Iraq story. Network coverage dropped from 178 stories/month in September 2007 to just 68 stories/month in November 2007. By February 2008, coverage had dropped to barely 40 stories/month . The end of combat operations is really a postscript to what should have been the big headline, the success of the U.S. surge strategy in smashing the al-Qaeda fueled insurgency that was plaguing Iraq in 2006.

Continue reading here:
Eight Years of Bias: The Liberal Media vs. the War in Iraq