Tag Archives: Cbs

Comedian Makes Courtney Love Abortion Jokes

This week comedian Ragan Fox ventured into the abortion-for-laughs arena. Fox is a “gay poet and performance artist,” according to WiredUpdate.com described Fox’s most recent podcast ( Warning: PG-13 ): Today we are going to highlight even more disturbing “jokes” that Ragan has written and performed within the same podcast…. Ragan begins by saying he adores singer/songwriter Courtney Love and he’s excited for the release of her new album. He then takes the conversation to a dark place while joking about abortions and battered women. In the clip Ragan says he can imagine Courtney performing an “inappropriate song about feminism” that involves performing a live abortion on stage…. He goes on, “‘Nobody’s Daughter’ (Courtney’s album title) is a reference to every abortion she has had. Let’s call a spade a space, Courtney Love has got to be the MacGyver of abortion.” Ragan then begins speaking in a drunken high pitch voice which is supposed to be his Courtney Love impersonation. As Courtney, Ragan says, “I give myself an abortion with pills, my pill abortion. I throw myself down the stairs, stair abortion. I douche with Clorox on a Sunday morning after a long Saturday night. Sometimes when I’m partying I’ll drink a Red Bull and Vodka abortion and like a trampoline abortion.” “One time I was going to shoot myself in the p***** (gunshot sound effect). I thought up of this abortion when I was married to Curt [sic] ( Cobain ) and I accidently shot him in the head. But I had to tell everybody he shot himself in the head. Who wants to hear my new song?” You can hear the unedited clip at Chris Rock bit in 2005, which I actually thought was good, despite the raunchiness, because it contained truth. Then came not-so-funny The Family Guy (graphic right) in 2009. But all abortion humor has value, according to pro-abort Sarah Seltzer at

See the article here:
Comedian Makes Courtney Love Abortion Jokes

ABCBSNBC Lost One Million Viewers Last Quarter

The big three nightly news broadcasts, NBC Nightly, CBS Evening and ABC World, lost a combined one million viewers in the second quarter of 2010, according to TVNewser. These numbers are comparable to the first quarter , which saw Evening News and World News get their lowest average viewers ever, while NBC’s Winter Olympics coverage helped it get their highest average viewers since 2005. In the second quarter, NBC lost 440,000 viewers, ABC 260,000 and CBS 340,000. It was about this time last year that ABC and CBS’ news programs had their lowest ratings ever. These numbers are not at all surprising in light of the public’s continued distrust of the old media. As Newsbusters’ Rich Noyes wrote of a Rasmussen poll released earlier this month, “Perhaps as a result, the poll finds an astonishing two-thirds of the public (66 percent) say they are angry with the media, ‘including 33 percent who are very angry’ with the press.” Polls going back to 1997 displayed a continued public distrust with the news media. In a Pew survey , 54 percent of Americans believed that the news media “gets in the way of society solving its problems.” In 2006 a CBS poll showed 36 percent of adults had very little confidence in the news media. There is also an expanding array of media options, both on the air and online. Not only can many of the evening news programs be found online shortly after broadcast, but 24 hour news channels allow one to get the content of the nightly news well before the program is on, to say nothing of multimedia sites such as Huffington Post, Brietbart and others which allow consumers access to a lot of news and opinion. TVNewser also reports that the 24 hour channels are also losing viewers, though not at the same rate as evening news programs. ( Here , here and here .)

Follow this link:
ABCBSNBC Lost One Million Viewers Last Quarter

Networks Mostly Skip Tense Kagan Exchange Over Abortion Memo, Downplay Hearings

Wednesday’s evening news shows and Thursday’s morning programs continued to minimize or leave out important moments of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearings. ABC’s Good Morning America, for instance, has offered only 67 seconds of coverage over three days. Today and The Early Show each provided a single 10 second news brief on Thursday. It’s not as though the second day of testimony lacked interesting developments. The New York Times on July 1 reported the intense questioning by Senator Orrin Hatch on an abortion memo written by then-Clinton White House Counsel Kagan. Hatch demanded, “Did you write that memo?…But did you write it? Is it your memo?” Kagan’s memo worried that a American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) report on abortion could be a “disaster” for the Clinton administration. None of the morning shows on Thursday mentioned the exchange between Hatch and Kagan. On Wednesday, only CBS’s Evening News raised the subject. Reporter Jan Crawford observed, “But when Senators tried to pin her down on other specific issues, she sidestepped. On whether she helped craft strategies supporting partial-birth abortion-” She then broke off and featured a clip of Hatch grilling. Crawford herself allowed that “over three days, there were plenty of tense and testy moments.” Apparently these examples were not interesting enough for ABC. In addition to only allowing 67 seconds on GMA, World News skipped the hearings completely. NBC’s Nightly News provided a more generalized account of the second day on hearings. Ignoring the abortion issue, correspondent Pete Williams explained that Kagan appeared “to back away from the position she expressed last year on gay marriage.” On another issue, Williams added, “But she very clearly rejected something she once wrote as a student. In a college paper, she had said judges have ‘authority to make social changes,’ power that ‘becomes irresistible.'” Nightly News, as well as the morning shows, also ignored ignored a clip of Kagan telling senators, “I’ve been a Democrat all my life. I’ve worked for two Democratic Presidents, and those are, you know, that’s what my political views are.” Only the Evening News noted the remark.  For more on Kagan’s abortion memo, see a CNSNews.com article on the topic: Three years after ACOG released its statement on partial-birth abortion — that included verbatim the words that had been the handwritten notes in Kagan’s White House files — the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart, which declared Nebraska’s ban on partial-birth abortion unconstitutional. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the Court’s decision in the case, quoting verbatim the passage from the ACOG statement on intact dilatation and extraction abortion that had originally appeared in the handwritten notes in Elena Kagan’s files released by the Clinton Presidential Library. Breyer wrote: “The District Court also noted that a select panel of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists concluded that D&X ‘may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman.’” “The picture that’s emerging,” says National Right to Life Legislative Director Douglas Johnson, reflecting on Kagan’s Clinton White House files, is that “it appears that Kagan was perhaps the key strategist in blocking enactment of the partial-birth abortion ban act.” Johnson also said he believes that Kagan had “her hands on this from the beginning to the end.” A transcript of the Evening News segment, which aired at on June 30, follows: SCOTT PELLEY: On Capitol Hill today, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan parried her way through her last day of confirmation hearings. Back in the 1990s when Kagan was an assistant law professor, she complained that such Senate hearings are, quote, “a vapid and hollow charade” because the nominees refuse to say anything of substance. Oh, how things change when you’re sitting in the witness chair. Here’s our chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford. JAN CRAWFORD: Over three days, there were plenty of tense and testy moments. SENATOR JON KYL (R-AZ): I absolutely disagree with you about that. SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER (D-PA): Apparently I’m not going to get an answer there, either. CRAWFORD: She defended her record on military recruiting at Harvard. SENATOR JON CORNYN (R-TX): It strikes me that the sole result and impact was to stigmatize the United States military on the campus. ELENA KAGAN: It certainly was not to stigmatize the military. And every time I talked about this policy and many times besides I talked about the honor I had for the military. CRAWFORD: But when Senators tried to pin her down on other specific issues, she sidestepped. On whether she helped craft strategies supporting partial-birth abortion. SENATOR ORRIN HATCH (R-UT): Did you write that memo? KAGAN: Senator, with respect, I don’t think that that’s what happened. HATCH: But did you write it? Is it your memo? KAGAN: The document is certainly in my handwriting. CRAWFORD: On gay marriage. SENATOR CHARLES GRASSLEY (R-IA): Do you believe that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide? KAGAN: There is, of course, a case coming down the road, and I want to be extremely careful about this question. CRAWFORD: But on some things, Kagan was blunt. KAGAN: I’ve been a Democrat all my life. I’ve worked for two Democratic Presidents, and those are, you know, that’s what my political views are. SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-SC): And would you consider your political views progressive? KAGAN: My political views are generally progressive, generally- CRAWFORD: She also showed real savvy, deftly deflecting Democrats’ criticisms of the Roberts court. KAGAN: I’m not agreeing to your characterizations of the current court. I think that that would be inappropriate for me to do- SENATOR SHELDON WHITEHOUSE (D-RI): I understand that. KAGAN: -and I’m sure that everybody up there is acting in good faith. CRAWFORD: And mixed with the serious exchanges was humor, something nominees typically are cautioned to avoid in case a joke backfires. SENATOR TOM COBURN (R-OK): I’m 12 or 13 years older than you. KAGAN: Maybe not after this hearing. COBURN: No, I’m sure I’m older. GRAHAM: Where are you at on Christmas Day? KAGAN: You know, like all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant. (AUDIENCE LAUGHTER) CRAWFORD: But without a misstep, Kagan seemed headed for easy confirmation. SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA): If you were confirmed – and I believe you’re going to be- CRAWFORD: One reason Republicans are unlikely to put up a fight is that she’s replacing a liberal. She won’t change the balance of the court. GRAHAM: So I wish you well and I know your family is proud of you and I think you’ve acquitted yourself very well. CRAWFORD: So is this a charade, Scott? Well, even Kagan herself admitted there’s no real upside to answering specific questions. It’s a successful strategy not to, and it looks like it’s going to work in her case as well.

Read more here:
Networks Mostly Skip Tense Kagan Exchange Over Abortion Memo, Downplay Hearings

NBC and ABC Barely Touch Kagan Hearings, CBS Promotes Her As ‘Very Agile’

While ABC’s Good Morning America and NBC’s Today spent little time on the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on Tuesday, the CBS Early Show featured a report from legal correspondent Jan Crawford, who cheered Kagan finally being able respond to Republican “attacks” in a “very agile” way. Good Morning America devoted only a single news brief early in the 7AM ET hour to the hearings as news reader JuJu Chang noted how Kagan “will be questioned by Republicans who say she is too liberal and too political.” Chang added: “Kagan promised to take a modest approach to judging.”   On Today, correspondent Kelly O’Donnell offered only a brief 7:09AM report on the hearings: “Weeks after her nomination, seated in silence for hours, finally Elena Kagan gets to make her case….[she] describes herself as a daughter of the American dream.” O’Donnell described the arguments from both sides of the aisle: “No surprise, Democrats praised her intellect and the chance to broaden the Supreme Court….Saying they would be respectful, Republicans did not hesitate to get tough. From abortion rights to immigration, they found various ways to call her liberal.” In an 8:04AM news brief, news reader Natalie Morales declared: “Republicans portrayed Kagan as a liberal activist with no judicial experience. Kagan promised an even-handed approach to the law.” In contrast, the Early Show devoted a full 7:10AM segment to Kagan, as fill-in co-host Chris Wragge proclaimed: “Day two of Elena Kagan’s Senate confirmation hearings get underway this morning and the gloves are expected to come off.” Crawford began the report that followed by observing: “After nearly two months of public silence while Republicans attacked her, Elena Kagan was sworn in and answered back. She vowed to uphold the law fairly.” Crawford previewed Tuesday’s hearings: “…today the questions and the fireworks begin. Republicans say the questions won’t be easy, as they try to paint her as a liberal activist.” Wragge asked about the tone of the hearings: “…every word yesterday from Elena was just so measured and so deliberate. Can we expect more of that today with every response from the questions she’ll be fielding?” Crawford replied: “No, it’s going to have a very different tone today….they’re really going to start pressing her on all these issues….what we’ll see today is how agile and how effective she is at answering those and responding to those, engaging these senators without saying anything that can be held against her.” Wragge concluded the segment by asking Crawford to predict Kagan’s performance. Crawford responded by gushing: “I think she’s going to do, actually, very, very well. I’ve seen her argue before the Supreme Court. She’s very agile , she spars with those conservative justices very well, so I don’t think these Republicans are going to have too much of an easy time, you know, pressing her on some of these issues.” Here is a full transcript of Crawford’s June 29 report: 7:10AM CHRIS WRAGGE: Day two of Elena Kagan’s Senate confirmation hearings get underway this morning and the gloves are expected to come off. CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford is on Capitol Hill with a look at today’s session. Jan, good morning. JAN CRAWFORD: Good morning, Chris. Well, you know Elena Kagan really stayed out of the public eye for two months and Americans finally got a glimpse of her, but today, she’s going to face a lot of questions from the Republicans on this side of the aisle and they’re going to see if she can handle the heat. After nearly two months of public silence while Republicans attacked her, Elena Kagan was sworn in and answered back. She vowed to uphold the law fairly. ELENA KAGAN: I will listen hard to every party before the court and to each of my colleagues. CRAWFORD: And she told a bit of her life story. KAGAN: My parents lived the American dream. They grew up in immigrant communities. My mother didn’t speak a word of English until she went to school. But she became a legendary teacher and my father a valued lawyer. CRAWFORD: Kagan sat stoically for hours while senators gave their opening statements, but today the questions and the fireworks begin. Republicans say the questions won’t be easy, as they try to paint her as a liberal activist. JEFF SESSIONS: It’s not a coronation, as I’ve said, but a confirmation process. Serious and substantive questions will be asked. CRAWFORD: But Democrats will be ready to come to her defense. CHARLES SCHUMER: She is brilliant, she is thoughtful, and I think she is straight out of central casting for this job. SESSIONS: But proving that to the senators is what Elena Kagan is going to have to do and it all starts, Chris, in just a couple of hours. WRAGGE: Jan, the last thing I would ever do is sit here and say this has got to be pretty easy on someone, but every word yesterday from Elena was just so measured and so deliberate. Can we expect more of that today with every response from the questions she’ll be fielding? CRAWFORD: No, it’s going to have a very different tone today, Chris. You know, yesterday, her face – I mean, she really showed no expression all day, she just sat there and listened to these senators deliver these long opening statements. So today they’re really going to start pressing her on all these issues that they’ve got ready. So what we’ll see today is how agile and how effective she is at answering those and responding to those, engaging these senators without saying anything that can be held against her. WRAGGE: And quickly, on a separate note here, I want to talk about this Supreme Court ruling. They ruled that had state and local governments cannot ban guns. Now what’s the importance, if you can just tell us quickly, of this 5-4 decision? CRAWFORD: Chris, this was a huge ruling that basically extended gun rights nationwide. It said cities and states across the country cannot flatly outright ban handguns, that you have a fundamental right to own a gun in your own home to protect yourself. WRAGGE: Can I ask you real quickly, you know Elena Kagan very well. How do you think she’ll perform today? CRAWFORD: I think she’s going to do, actually, very, very well. I’ve seen her argue before the Supreme Court. She’s very agile, she spars with those conservative justices very well, so I don’t think these Republicans are going to have too much of an easy time, you know, pressing her on some of these issues. WRAGGE: Alright, Jan Crawford, thank you very much. We look forward to your report later on today. CRAWFORD: Thanks, Chris.

View original post here:
NBC and ABC Barely Touch Kagan Hearings, CBS Promotes Her As ‘Very Agile’

Chicago Tribune: Supreme Court ‘Extends Gun Rights’

“Supreme Court extends gun rights” a headline on the Web site for the Chicago Tribune erroneously claims today. The link on the page brought readers to a story entitled “Supreme Court extends gun rights in Chicago case.” Here’s the opening paragraph: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court reversed a ruling upholding Chicago ‘s ban today and extended the reach of the 2nd Amendment as a nationwide protection against laws that infringe the “right to keep and bear arms.” But that language suggests that the Court invented a right out of whole cloth rather than grounded its decision in the Constitution itself. In truth, what the Supreme Court found in McDonald v. City of Chicago was that the 2nd Amendment’s guarantee of the individual’s right to firearm ownership is incorporated to the states via the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause. “The right to keep and bear arms must be regarded as a substantive guarantee, not a prohibition that could be ignored so long as the States legislated in an even handed manner,” Justice Alito wrote for the Court.  The bottom line: The Supreme Court recognized that the City of Chicago was in violation of the the 2nd and 14th Amendments to the federal Constitution. A more accurate headline would have been “Supreme Court finds Chicago gun ban violates Constitution.” Of course, that presupposes the liberal media in Chicago are interested in shooting straight when it comes to reporting developments with which they have an ideological disagreement.

Read more from the original source:
Chicago Tribune: Supreme Court ‘Extends Gun Rights’

Networks Defend ‘Consensus Builder’ Kagan; Downplay Military Recruiter Ban

The Monday morning shows on CBS, ABC, and NBC all worked to portray President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan as a moderate and open-minded legal scholar, downplaying her liberal views. All three network programs also minimized her controversial decision to ban military recruiters on campus while Dean of Harvard Law School. On CBS’s Early Show, legal correspondent Jan Crawford touted Kagan as “an intellectual heavyweight and consensus builder.” Crawford noted how Republicans had “several lines of attack” against Kagan and would “try to paint her as a liberal activist.” Crawford herself recently described Kagan as having “stood shoulder to shoulder with the liberal left.” On ABC’s Good Morning America, correspondent Claire Shipman did a fawning segment on Kagan in the 8AM ET hour, describing the former Dean as “intellectual” and “full of personal charm” during her tenure at Harvard. Shipman claimed that Kagan had “a determination to be open-minded,” despite banning military recruiters from the university’s campus over the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy. On that issue, Shipman explained that despite Kagan’s decision being unpopular “among student military vets…. Iraq War veteran Kurt White says they were won over by Kagan’s persistent outreach , another example of her political skills.” Shipman failed to mention that White would be testifying on Kagan’s behalf during the confirmation hearings. Shipman went so far to portray Kagan as open-minded that she touted how “though her political views are quite different than his, she honored conservative justice Antonin Scalia at the law school a few years ago, calling him a great justice.” Shipman even argued: ” It’s an openness to all voices that worries some liberals, but colleagues argue Kagan’s style is just what the Court needs.” NBC’s Today did not provide quite as strong a defense of Kagan, but a report by legal correspondent Pete Williams did feature a soundbite from Kagan supporter and SCOTUS blog founder Tom Goldstein declaring: “Elena Kagan isn’t a political partisan.” Williams, like Shipman, attempted to downplay the military recruiter ban: “Republicans also accuse Kagan of treating the military unfairly when she was dean of Harvard Law….But student military veterans say she made them feel welcome at Harvard and praised them for their service, even though she strongly opposed the policy on gays in the military.”   Here is a full transcript of Shipman’s June 28 segment on Good Morning America: 8:15AM GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan is preparing to take the stand for Senate confirmation hearings this afternoon, and they’re meant to tease out the nominee’s judicial philosophy. Well for some clues, Claire Shipman talked to some people who knew Kagan during the most substantial legal job of her career, the first woman dean of Harvard Law School. CLAIRE SHIPMAN, ABC correspondent: Good morning, George, well that’s right. We decided to look for clues at Harvard Law School where she had a very distinctive style. She was only there for six years, made a large number of changes. She was intellectual, yes, but also full of personal charm, say colleagues, and a determination to be open-minded. It’s an institution usually resistant to change, some might say an immovable object, until it was confronted with the irresistible force of Dean Elena Kagan. ELENA KAGAN: This is a wonderful time, and it’s so good to be with you. LAURENCE TRIBE, Harvard Law professor: I’ve watched Harvard Law School go through lots of transitions, but there has never been anything like Elena Kagan. MARTHA MINOW, Harvard Law dean: She was going to turn over every stone at this institution and figure out a way to make it better. SHIPMAN: She thinks big. MINOW: She thinks big. SHIPMAN: But she was savvy enough at times to start small, offering perks like free coffee for students. Then bigger battles, fighting to hire more conservative professors like John Manning.   JOHN MANNING, Harvard Law professor: She felt that her job as dean was to foster an atmosphere in which all sorts of ideas would be presented. SHIPMAN: And selling a total curriculum overhaul, the first in a hundred years. KAGAN: For the most part, a first year curriculum now looks like what it looks like back in 1880. SHIPMAN: Some say her meteoric rise is impressive, but also suggests a calculating careerism. Two of her best friends, roommates at law school, say she’s just always just reveled in the work. JOHN BARRETT, friend of Kagan: A visual that I have, a memory, is her sitting at her desk with a cigarette and a pen and a book and a little desk lamp, and she could kind of grind it out for a long time. UNIDENTIFIED FRIEND OF KAGAN: I think what was clear was that she really loved the law, and reading about it, and thinking about it, and talking about it. SHIPMAN: Her time as dean wasn’t without controversy. She decided to renew a ban keeping military recruiters from using the career services office because of opposition to the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. Support was high on campus, but not among student military vets. KURT WHITE, Harvard Law student: It didn’t seem like banning military recruiters from the law school campus was going to be something that was likely to lead to a change in this law. SHIPMAN: Still, Iraq War veteran Kurt White says they were won over by Kagan’s persistent outreach, another example of her political skills. WHITE: It was really her showing her appreciation for the military and being very supportive of us. SHIPMAN: And though her political views are quite different than his, she honored conservative justice Antonin Scalia at the law school a few years ago, calling him a great justice. MANNING: She as dean was able to recognize his accomplishments and celebrate them without reservation. SHIPMAN: It’s an openness to all voices that worries some liberals, but colleagues argue Kagan’s style is just what the Court needs. TRIBE: I think that her ability to find common ground, bring people along, see long-term implications, will make a very large impact on the Court. SHIPMAN: It’s certainly a good place to start hearings as a potential liberal justice when you have the support of a conservative justice, like justice Scalia. George, but of course the hearings will still be heated, they’ll look at that military recruitment issue, and also try to pin her down specifically on how she might rule on some controversial issues. STEPHANOPOULOS: That’s right, and in an election year, likely to get a lot of no votes as well. Okay Claire Shipman, thanks very much.

Read more from the original source:
Networks Defend ‘Consensus Builder’ Kagan; Downplay Military Recruiter Ban

Watch Miami Medical Season 1 Episode 12 – Down To The Bone

Watch Miami Medical S1E12: Down To The Bone The latest installment of Miami Medical is the TV show’s 12th episode of the 1st season that aired last 06/25/10 Friday 10:00 PM on CBS. Watch Miami Medical 1×12 (01012) Free Online Streaming Full Episodes Replay of the Latest Season and Video Clip Download Link:

See original here:
Watch Miami Medical Season 1 Episode 12 – Down To The Bone

Lake Bell Exits Scream 4

Was Lake Bell a big enough celebrity to shoot a “name cameo” (read: opening scene cannon fodder) in Scream 4 ? No matter: the How to Make It in America actress has been forced to drop out . “Sucks: Scheduling conflicts with my current gig means I cant do #Scream4!” she tweeted last night. “(Hey horror bloggers, I know who the killer is…)” Amanda Bynes, call your agent — it’s comeback time! [ Coming Soon ]

Originally posted here:
Lake Bell Exits Scream 4

Will Jason Segel Be Fired From How I Met Your Mother Because Of This Quote?

Eight years is a long time to be chained to a network sitcom, especially when your career has blown up so much over the past few seasons that you are currently attached to star in big-budget features opposite Jack Black and Cameron Diaz, not to mention co-write The Greatest Muppet Movie Ever Made (really, that is the title). Just ask Jason Segel, who recently attempted to explain his dead-end How I Met Your Mother obligation to an interviewer and ended up sounding a bit resentful of the CBS series that helped make his name.

See the rest here:
Will Jason Segel Be Fired From How I Met Your Mother Because Of This Quote?

Morning Shows Skip Sexual Assault Charge Against Al Gore

All three morning shows on Thursday ignored allegations of “unwanted sexual contact” by Al Gore against a woman in 2006. This is despite the fact that the claim was reported by the AP, the New York Times and the Washington Post . CBS’s Early Show, NBC’s Today and ABC’s Good Morning America all failed to mention the charges made by the Oregon massage therapist that Gore tried to have sex with her. Yet, on June 2, after Al and Tipper Gore announced their divorce, ABC reporter Claire Shipman wondered if the separation meant that “storybook endings” aren’t possible. Logically, wouldn’t the morning show want to follow up with this new development? When Republican Nikki Haley was accused of having an affair with two different men, GMA had no trouble covering the story. On June 9 , host George Stephanopoulos interviewed the South Carolina gubernatorial candidate about the allegations and demanded, “Can you assure South Carolina voters that they’re not going to be embarrassed if they elect you?” On June 7 , he marveled, “And down in South Carolina, they can’t just seem to get enough of it. In the gubernatorial primary, the leading candidate embroiled in a bit of a sex scandal.” The program noted the story again on June 10 . Now, obviously, there are differences. Gore is a private citizen. Haley is running for office. However, there is an actual police report in the Gore case. Additionally, journalists were quite taken with the then-Vice President when he famously kissed his wife at the 2000 Democratic National Convention. Those same reporters have a responsibility to cover unflattering allegation’s about Gore. ABC, although unable to mention the charges on GMA, did note them on the network’s website . A sympathetic headline proclaimed, “Al Gore Sex Abuse Allegations Lack Sufficient Evidence, Say Portland Police.”

See the original post here:
Morning Shows Skip Sexual Assault Charge Against Al Gore