Tag Archives: city

Eminem Beef With Insane Clown Posse Long Over

Rivalry between Detroit artists was quashed by late D12 member Proof, says Violent J. By Kyle Anderson Insane Clown Posse’s Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope Photo: MTV News Eminem and Jay-Z will take the stage at Comerica Park in Slim Shady’s hometown of Detroit on Thursday (September 2) for the kickoff of the unprecedented Home and Home concerts. The shows feature arguably the world’s two biggest MCs onstage together in baseball stadiums in each of their respective birthplaces. There was a time back in the day when the idea of Eminem representing Detroit would have called forth the ire of fellow Motor City madmen Insane Clown Posse, but that is now water under the bridge. “The beef we had with him was 11 years ago,” Shaggy 2 Dope explained. “That’s like beefing with somebody in high school and going to your 20th high school reunion, and you still have heat with that kid?” In fact, the proverbial hatchet between Em and ICP has been buried for quite a few years, and the credit for that goes to late D12 member Proof. “Proof squashed that beef before he passed away,” Violent J said. “He contacted us and we had a bowling game — it was really cool. We’re something different. They could have skipped over us and said forget them, but they included us and said let’s squash it.” ICP have even been enthusiasts of Eminem’s later work. “Some people call it horrorcore, we call it the wicked sh–, but it was cool to see him dabbling with that again on the first Relapse record, with ‘3 A.M.’ and stuff like that,” Violent J added. Though their lyrics remain as intense as ever, ICP have clearly mellowed a bit. They have good reason to, as the 20-year veterans have legions of followers (the Juggalos), a minor merchandising empire and their very own annual festival. Their latest project is a just-released film called “Big Money Rustlas,” comedy-western and a spiritual prequel to their cult hit “Big Money Hustlas.” With their focus on a number of different business ventures, ICP are goal-oriented. And though they’re cool with Eminem putting a face on the city they call home, they’ve got goals of their own. “We’re not really looking at how well he’s representing Detroit, because we’re representing Detroit ourselves,” Violent J said. “So we got our eye on that prize.” Related Artists Insane Clown Posse Eminem

Go here to read the rest:
Eminem Beef With Insane Clown Posse Long Over

When Bike Sharing Falters (and Why We Can’t Let It)

Photo credit by batega via flickr. In its early days, Barcelona’s Bicing seemed like an unparalleled success . With 400 stations and 3,000 of the squat, burly red-and-white bikes stationed around the city, Bicing quickly became part of Barcelona’s big city atmosphere and was enthusiastically received by inhabitants. But after five years, something scary started to happen, in addition to the vandalism and

See more here:
When Bike Sharing Falters (and Why We Can’t Let It)

Mark Ronson Brings Bikes to Life and Chases Babes (Video)

Image: MSN.com I’m admitting it: I have a great big dude crush on Mark Ronson . The British musician/producer has put together some of the best pop music the world’s heard in a while, and I can’t DJ a party without spinning his recut of Britney Spears’ Toxic (with Tiggers, ODB, and the Daptones horn section). Ronson’s upcoming release, Record Collection, includes a track called Bike Song, and the video is a beautiful thing. Ronson, Spank Rock, and Kyle Falconer bring the city’s bikes t… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the rest here:
Mark Ronson Brings Bikes to Life and Chases Babes (Video)

The Female Form- The most beautiful 2D Girls

ART- The most beautiful CG girls Gallery – 3DM3: Beautiful work. This selection IS excellent. LINK _ http://www.3dm3.com/cggirls/# /content/2d%2Dgirls/ http://www.3dm3.com/cggirls/content/2d-girls/Taj_Lotus_by_Mess_Studio.jpg added by: remanns

Even in the Year 1076 Muslims Couldn’t Get Along with Their Neighbors

The First Crusade played a very important part in Medieval England. The First Crusade was an attempt to re-capture Jerusalem. After the capture of Jerusalem by the Muslims in 1076, any Christian who wanted to pay a pilgrimage to the city faced a very hard time. Muslim soldiers made life very difficult for the Christians and trying to get to Jerusalem was filled with danger for a Christian. This greatly angered all Christians. One Christian – called Alexius I of Constantinople – feared that his country might also fall to the Muslims as it was very close to the territory captured by the Muslims. Constantinople is in modern day Turkey. Alexius called on the pope – Urban II – to give him help. In 1095, Urban spoke to a great crown at Clermont in France. He called for a war against the Muslims so that Jerusalem was regained for the Christian faith. In his speech he said: “Christians, hasten to help your brothers in the East, for they are being attacked. Arm for the rescue of Jerusalem under your captain Christ. Wear his cross as your badge. If you are killed your sins will be pardoned.” Those who volunteered to go to fight the Muslims cut out red crosses and sewed them on their tunics. The French word “croix” means cross and the word changed to “croisades” or crusades. The fight against the Muslims became a Holy War. Many people did volunteer to fight on the First Crusade. There were true Christians who wanted to reclaim Jerusalem for their belief and get the Muslims out of the city. There were those who knew they had committed sin and that by going on the Crusade they might be forgiven by God. They had also been told by the pope that if they were killed, they would automatically go to heaven as they were fighting for God. There were those who thought that they might get rich by taking the wealth that they thought existed in Jerusalem. Any crusader could claim to be going on a pilgrimage for God – pilgrims did not have to pay tax and they were protected by the Church. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/cru2.htm added by: congoboy

Flashback: After Katrina, Sensationalistic Media Accounts Earned Press a D-Minus

Five years ago on Sunday, Hurricane Katrina smashed into the Gulf coast, devastating much of the region, and most memorably New Orleans. Yesterday was an occasion to look back at what went wrong in the city, and hope that the same mistakes are not made again. One of the most notorious failures surrounding Katrina was the media’s coverage of the situation in New Orleans. One “well-known [television] anchor,” actor and filmmaker Harry Shearer recalled in an interview with Daily Finance’s Jeff Bercovici, claimed the “the emotional stories are more compelling for our audience.” Hence, the media mostly ignored the larger issues facing the city – survivors still stranded on rooftops, the reasons for the levy’s failures – in favor of more sensationalistic, occasionally outright false stories. Shearer gives the media’s coverage – with the notable exceptions of only a couple outlets – a D-minus. Shearer told Bercovici: The [New York] Times did okay. I think the rest of the press gets a D, and probably a D-minus for their efforts at patting themselves on the back about how well they did speaking truth to power. Anderson Cooper … giving a lecture to [Louisiana senator] Mary Landrieu, like that’s the person you need to lecture. It was grandstanding and showboating in place of telling a story — partly because they left. They left. Water leaves, story over. The [New Orleans] Times-Picayune won two Pulitzers for their work because they couldn’t leave. They lived there. They had to stay. In addition to the Times’s coverage, Shearer also praised the work of Michael Grunwald, who covered Katrina for Time and the Washington Post. But he went on to blast the press’s shallow approach to post-Katrina coverage, claiming that news consumers saw “lots of images of people destitute and unhappy but never [got] to find out why.” W. Joseph Campbell, communications professor at American University and author of “Getting it Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism” (hint: Katrina is one of the 10) agrees with Shearer. In the book, he wrote that post-Katrina media coverage “was in important respects flawed and exaggerated. On crucial details, journalists erred badly, and got it wrong.” They reported snipers firing at medical personnel. They reported that shots were fired at helicopters, halting evacuations from the Convention Center [in New Orleans]. They told of bodies being stacked there like cordwood. They reported roving gangs were preying on tourists and terrorizing the occupants of the Superdome, raping and killing. They said children were victims of sexual assault, that one seven-year-old was raped and her throat was slit. They reported that sharks were plying the flooded streets of New Orleans. Those reports were all wrong, and they contributed mightily to the public (mis)perception of the situation in New Orleans. At his blog, Media Myth Alert , Campbell added no single news organization committed all those errors. And not all those lapses were committed at the same time, although they were largely concentrated during the first days of September 2005. In any case, I write, the erroneous and over-the-top reporting “had the cumulative the effect of painting for America and the rest of the world a scene of surreal violence and terror, something straight out of Mad Max or Lord of the Flies.” Estimates of Katrina’s death toll in New Orleans also were wildly exaggerated. U.S. Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, said on September 2, 2005, that fatalities in the state could reach 10,000 or more. Vitter described his estimate as “only a guess,” but it was nonetheless taken up by the then-New Orleans mayor, Ray Nagin, and reported widely. In all, the death toll in Louisiana from Katrina was around 1,500. About the inaccurate estimates of fatalities, the Times of London said it had become clear by in mid-September 2005 “that 10,000 people could have died only if more than 90 per cent of them had locked themselves into their homes, chained themselves to heavy furniture and chosen to drown instead of going upstairs as the waters rose.” But the Times rationalized the flawed reporting, suggesting that it was inevitable: When “nature and the 24-hour news industry collide, hyperbole results.” A weak excuse, that. Besides, post-Katrina reporting from New Orleans was more than hyperbolic: It described apocalyptic horrors that the hurricane supposedly unleashed. “D-minus” is none too generous. As usual, the media adopted the role of the nation’s finger-pointers in New Orleans in Katrina’s aftermath, singling out a number of people and institutions they thought deserved blame. Ironically, of all the failings in the days after the hurricane hit, the media’s will inevitably be remembered as among the most grave.

See more here:
Flashback: After Katrina, Sensationalistic Media Accounts Earned Press a D-Minus

Matthews and Maddow Bash ‘Racist Tea Party Blogger’ Who Contributes to Democrats and Gay Rights Groups

Those crack researchers at MSNBC have done it again! Last week, hosts Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow both did stories about a blogger whose travel instructions for folks going to Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally got posted at the Maine Tea Party Patriots website. Included were warnings about what stops to avoid on the DC Metro. Predictably, the liberal blogosphere had a field day with this citing it as another “example” of racism within the Tea Party. There’s only one problem: the culprit, a Washington, D.C.-based realtor, is a major contributor to the Democrat Party as well as gay rights groups. But before we get there, here’s what Rachel Maddow reported Monday with the help of the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson (videos follow with transcripts and commentary, h/t Seton Motley): RACHEL MADDOW, HOST: This weekend is the anniversary of “I Have a Dream” speech, one of the most famous speeches, one of the most famous moments in America history. This year, on the 47th anniversary of the speech, a FOX News Channel TV host has decided to use the anniversary as an occasion for a rally of conservatives in Washington at the site of the speech at the Lincoln Memorial. I don`t purport to understand revising civil rights history so people will think conservatives were form civil rights and not against. I do not purport to understand these revisionist efforts. I`m just telling you that`s what they`re doing. But a Tea Party group based in the great state of Maine has put out a guide for any Tea Party minded folks who might be planning on attending the rally in D.C. It`s sort of a tea partiers rough guide “I`m from out of town” guidebook for visiting our nation`s capital — parts of it at least, parts of our nation`s capital, very specific parts of it. Right before they list the exact home addresses for a number of Democratic politicians — nice — they give tea partiers traveling to D.C. for this big rally, they give them some safety advice for how a visiting tea partier protestor should visit our nation`s capital. Quote, “If you are on the subway, stay on the red line between Union Station and Shady Grove, Maryland. If you are on the blue or orange line, do not go past Eastern Market, Capitol Hill, toward the Potomac Avenue stop and beyond. Stay in northwest D.C. and points in Virginia. Do not use the green line or yellow line. These rules are even more important at night.” There is, of course, nothing wrong with many other areas, but you don`t know where you are, so you should not explore them. Do not use the green line or the yellow line. It is dangerous. It is scary. The whole lines. Don`t — don`t — if you`re coaching the turnstile and you feel like — is it nighttime? Yes. Don`t do it! As you can see, the green and yellow lines are two of D.C.`s central metro lines. In fact, you make it harder on yourself if you don`t take those lines, especially if you`re coming in from Maryland or, say, Virginia. I wonder if it`s rough for the people going, say, to the Pentagon, right? Not being able to ride the blue line because the yellow line is so scary. Protecting yourself from the evil green and yellow lines would also protect you, of course, from Howard University, the country`s most prominent historically black college — aahh! Or maybe it`s the U Street stop, the U Street stop where you`ll find Ben`s Chili Bowl, a historic restaurant that attracts luminaries and laymen alike with its sloppy beefy goodness, and at which I gained five pounds in two weeks while once renting an office across the street. Perhaps it`s another attraction only accessible on the yellow and green lines could be the National Archives where the Constitution is? Be afraid, Constitution is there, especially at night. Look at this other map of D.C. Here`s another map of D.C. You see the big rectangular part? If you follow the Tea Party tour guide, you will limit yourself to that little sliver — see that tiny sliver in the middle of it? Little tiny, little thing looks like a flag on its side — that`s it. That`s the part of D.C. you`re advised to segregate yourself within if you are visiting Washington, D.C. for the anniversary of the “I Have a Dream” speech. Joining us now is Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist of “The Washington Post” and MSNBC contributor and D.C. resident Eugene Robinson. Gene, thanks very much for your time. EUGENE ROBINSON, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Good to be here, Rachel. MADDOW: If you avoided all the places in D.C. that the main Tea Party wants you to avoid, what would your experience of Washington, D.C. be like? ROBINSON: It wouldn`t — you wouldn`t see much of the city, obviously. You would — you`d spend a lot of time trying to get to places accessible only on the green and yellow lines by way of the red line, but only the red line to Union Station. So, I don`t know what you`re supposed to do when you get to Union Station. Get on a train and get out of town immediately. Look, this is — this is obviously “scaring white people” part two, and what they have done is essentially try to put off-limits any parts of the city where these main tea partiers believe you might be more likely to encounter, dare I say, black people. MADDOW: What are some of the things that you would miss if you were sincerely going to cut the green and yellow lines out of your life? ROBINSON: Well, let`s see. You couldn`t — you couldn`t go to the D.C. waterfront or the Arena Stage, one of the great theaters in the nation`s capital. If you took seriously their prescription about where to go on the red line, of course, you couldn`t go to Catholic University, to the National Shrine, the grandest Catholic basilica in Washington. You know, I could go on and on. You`d miss the whole U Street scene, which is the most happening nightlife and restaurant scene in town. And, of course, you would miss the newly gentrifying Eighth Street corridor, which is the kind of really hippest, most cutting edge part of town. But you don`t want to see any of that. You want to be afraid and you want to stay in this little — this little kind of safe zone. MADDOW: Well, you can tell my feelings about this by the way I introduced it. I know, rare. But it does seem particularly amazing to me to have this “stay away from all the parts of the city where you might encounter black people” instruction when they are going to a rally that is on the occasion of the 1963 march on Washington and the “I Have a Dream” speech. I have to ask your reaction to the overall setting here, hosting a sort of conservative take back civil rights rally on this occasion. ROBINSON: I have — I have two reactions, I guess, Rachel. Number one, you know, this is being put on by Glenn Beck, who I think his main purpose here is self self-aggrandizement on an almost Napoleonic scale. I mean, and so, I think that`s really a large part of what this is about. Now, a lot of people will come, be like a Tea Party rally, I think, in that there will be some racist elements, there will be some crazies, and there will also be a lot of people who are animated by perhaps a diffused sense of grievance who just happen to have picked the wrong pied piper. And so, those are the people for whom I guess I feel a bit sorry because I think in the end, Glenn Beck is out for himself and they`re going to be kind of left with their grievances unaddressed and feeling worse about the political process and worse about everything than before. MADDOW: And not to mention strict instructions not to visit the Constitution. ROBINSON: They`re not going to have any fun in Washington. Then again, we`ll all be able to eat the Ben`s Chili Bowl because there won`t be any out-of-towners there. So, there will be more for us. (LAUGHTER) MADDOW: You know, Mr. Silver Lining does it again. Well-done, Eugene Robinson. Thanks a lot, Gene. I really appreciate it. ROBINSON: Good to be here, Rachel. MADDOW: Gene, of course, is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for “The Washington Post” and an MSNBC contributor. Yes, he sure is. Too bad neither Rach nor the Pulitzer Prize winner thought to look further into the background of the blogger before making fools of themselves. After all, as the Daily Beast reported Saturday, Bruce Majors throughout his life has almost exclusively contributed to Democrats (h/t Broliath ): According to OpenSecrets.org , he’s donated about $15,000 to Democrats since 2000, including a $10,000 donation to the DNC in 2000, a $500 donation to Howard Dean in 2003, and a $1,000 donation to John Kerry in 2004. His only recent contribution to a Republican candidate was $250 in 2002 to retired Rep. Jim Kolbe, then lone openly gay Republican in Congress.  Being a naturally suspicious sort, I decided to check OpenSecrets.org for myself. Here’s what I found : There could be many Bruce Majors in D.C. How do we know this is the same one? Well, this is what he told the Daily Beast: “I kind of wish I hadn’t given tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats, especially with the real-estate business what it is today,” he said. “Now I can only give a few hundred a year to libertarians to try to make up the balance.”  Majors says he also donated tens of thousands of dollars to the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT advocacy group, and once won a role as an extra in the sitcom Will & Grace at one of their charity auctions. “I was going to a lot of lesbian cocktail parties raising money for Gore and then Kerry/Edwards,” he said. “I’m sure they’re all horrified this week.” With this in mind, do you think Maddow and Robinson would have been yucking it up at Majors’ expense if they knew he was such a large contributor to Democrats as well as LGBT causes? But the fun doesn’t end there, for on Tuesday, Chris Matthews covered the story with the Chicago Tribune’s Clarence Page: CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Ahead of Glenn Beck`s rally this Saturday on the Lincoln Memorial, Tea Party activist Bruce Majors posted online a primer on how out-of-towners should navigate D.C. during that event. The guide was then circulated through a main Tea Party site. In this section of this blog, or whatever, entitled “Safety and Mores,” Major`s first sentence reads, quote, “D.C.`s population includes refugees from every country. Most taxi driver and many waiters, waitresses especially in local coffee shops, like the Bread and Chocolate chain, are immigrants. Frequently from east Africa or Arab countries. As a rule, African immigrants do not like for you to assume they are African- Americans, and especially do not like for you to guess they are from a neighboring country, for example, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia.” Joining me to discuss the Tea Party guide to the capital, fellow D.C. resident, Clarence Page. You know, this is — I don`t know, I`m going to laugh, because it`s absurdity. CLARENCE PAGE, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: This is absurd. MATTHEWS: But this is telling white folk how to get through an ethnically diverse town with a lot of African-Americans, which has been African-American in its majority I think since the Civil War. You know, I`ve lived there since I got out of the Peace Corps. These people need a special guide. It`s a regular big city, folks. Your thoughts? PAGE: I thought this was a satire, at first, though. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: It looks like a liberal satire or stereotyped view of what Tea Party people think. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: But it`s — it`s essentially a guide for — this is the sort of thing you hear from every small town person who is afraid of big cities. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: Coming from a small town, I can say this. I grew up in John Boehner`s district, as you know. MATTHEWS: Right. PAGE: Middletown, Ohio. And I want to tell you, we`re not all hicks out there, Chris, but — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Use your common sense when you come to a big city. But here he is, here`s Majors, also outlined — he outlined that areas of this city we`re in right now to avoid certain metro rail lines that means subway lines and neighborhoods far from the Capitol and the National Mall. D.C. blog took Major`s restrictions and blog. Look how they showed it. They took it. Look at the map. They Googled the map and shown it. See the little blue area? That`s the only place in Washington, according to this blogger, it`s safe to go in Washington. I got to tell you. It`s an awful boring trip if you only do the — that`s basically the Washington Mall from what I can tell. PAGE: There`s also your neighborhood, in the pink zone, I believe. MATTHEWS: No. I`m up in the far northwest up there. But anyway. PAGE: Look how absurd this, though. I mean, the normal street life in D.C. is, you know, stay to the west of the park — MATTHEWS: Right. PAGE: — or Rock Creek Park. Now, east of the park has gotten largely gentrified. This city defies `60s stereotypes from the old Clint Eastwood movies. But this is still Dirty Harry city. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You and I know that the zestiest part of the town are the areas that are most mixed — PAGE: Oh, yes. MATTHEWS: — edgy, the most fun for young people. All the young people now live on 14th Street. PAGE: And he does give props to Silver Springs and some other nice suburbs and some neighborhoods (INAUDIBLE) Capitol Hill. Delicious. For the record, these weren’t the only mainstream media figures to take the bait. The Associated Press did a number of articles about Majors as well. Would he have gotten any attention if they would have known he’s lived in D.C. for thirty years and given so much money to liberals? Yes, that’s a rhetorical question.

Follow this link:
Matthews and Maddow Bash ‘Racist Tea Party Blogger’ Who Contributes to Democrats and Gay Rights Groups

GZM Developer, Imam Have Tax, Financial Issues; Will National Media Care?

This past weekend, intrepid journalists at the New York Post and NorthJersey.com released information they unearthed about proposed Ground Zero Mosque “organizer” Sharif El-Gamal and frontman Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, respectively, that the wire services, the New York Times and the national TV networks would likely have run with by now had the items related to a major church or synagogue. But since the news has to do with what has turned into the PC crowd’s cause celebre and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s personal pet project, you may not see the stories covered anywhere else. The arguably more important story of the two concerns the tax problems of Mr. El-Gamal (pictured above via the Post) and his company, because they directly related to the GZM’s property. The story by Isabel Vincent and Melissa Klein went up early Sunday morning: Mosque big owes 224G tax The mosque developers are tax deadbeats. Sharif El-Gamal, the leading organizer behind the mosque and community center near Ground Zero, owes $224,270.77 in back property tax on the site, city records show. El-Gamal’s company, 45 Park Place Partners, failed to pay its half-yearly bills in January and July, according to the city Finance Department. The delinquency is a possible violation of El-Gamal’s lease with Con Edison, which owns half of the proposed building site on Park Place. El-Gamal owns the other half but must pay taxes on the entire parcel. … Before any building can go forward, the developers also must get approval from the MTA because the 2 and 3 subway lines run under a portion of the Park Place property, The Post has learned. … El-Gamal’s spokesperson insisted to The Post that the taxes had been paid and that the “subway lines do not pose a problem.” The Post revealed this month that El-Gamal owned only half the site. The news about Imam Rauf (picture above is an AP file photo) comes from Peter J. Sampson and Jean Rimbach at NewsJersey.com (“Ground Zero Imam has history of tenant troubles; N.J. apartments in need of repair”). In addition to the problems noted in the headline, it seems that Rauf has experience squeezing money out of the political system: The Muslim cleric at the center of the proposed mosque and community center near Ground Zero is also a New Jersey landlord who got more than $2 million in public financing to renovate low-income apartments and has been beset for years by tenant complaints and financial problems. Imam Feisal A. Rauf won support for his Hudson County projects from powerful politicians, among them Robert C. Janiszewski, the disgraced former county executive. He also was awarded grants from Union City when U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez was mayor. … Rauf forged ties with Fred Daibes, the prominent waterfront developer and bank chairman. Additionally, Rauf is a onetime business ally of a Daibes associate who sued the imam for alleged mortgage fraud. The 2008 suit was quietly settled in June. The revelations about Rauf, who lives in North Bergen, add another dimension to the public profile of a man both lauded as a builder of bridges between diverse religions and cultures and vilified as being insensitive to the survivors of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attack by proposing a mosque near the World Trade Center site. … Page after page of municipal health records examined by The Record show repeated complaints ranging from failure to pick up garbage, to rat and bedbug infestations and no heat and hot water. Cynthia Balko, 48, of Union City — a longtime tenant of Rauf’s — said she’s had to live with rats, leaks and no heat: “I don’t have anything nice to say about the man.” She finds it hard to believe Rauf’s going to build a world-class Islamic community center, with fitness facilities, auditorium, restaurant, library, culinary school and art studios, as well as a Sept. 11 memorial and space for Muslim prayer services. “He can’t even repair the bells in the hallway. He doesn’t take care of his properties. But he’s going to take care of a mosque?” The biggest tax involved in all of this may be on the establishment press’s cover-up mechanisms. So far, they’re holding. As of shortly after midnight Eastern Time, three stories at the Associated Press time-stamped with Monday’s or Sunday’s date that mentioned the Ground Zero Mosque, which the AP refers to as the “Park51 project” ( here , here , and here ) had no reference to either gentleman’s difficulties. The New York Times also had nothing beyond the AP items just noted. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

View post:
GZM Developer, Imam Have Tax, Financial Issues; Will National Media Care?

‘Meet the Press’ Katrina Special: All Bush and Federal Government’s Fault

As the fifth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina slamming New Orleans nears, the folks at NBC offered viewers a “Meet the Press” special edition with a sadly predictable conclusion: the disaster was all George W. Bush and the federal government’s fault. The New Orleans mayor at the time was almost entirely ignored in this hour-long examination. The only mention of the state’s former governor was actually one of praise. Rather than offering one new compelling insight into the natural disaster that changed America, the invited guests all fed fill-in host Brian Williams the same old tired lines about racism and classism; despite numerous opportunities to delve into the decades of political corruption in the region that left the levees surrounding New Orleans in a dreadful state of disrepair, the subject was never broached. Instead, what ensued – given all the time and resources available to really do a groundbreaking exposé on this issue – was something all those involved should be tremendously embarrassed for. Frankly, that was clear right from the get go (partial video follows with partial transcript and commentary, full video and transcript here and here respectively): MR. BRIAN WILLIAMS: August 29th, 2005, Hurricane Katrina touches down on the Louisiana coast. The city’s levees fail, the next morning nearly 80 percent of New Orleans is under water. A botched government response, a poor local evacuation plan, thousands are left without food, water, shelter or safety, trapped for days as the city is looted and its people suffer.  Here’s the picture that was on the screen when Williams said “botched government response”: And that was just the beginning: WILLIAMS: Senator Landrieu, before I begin with you, I want to show you a piece of videotape of another member of your family. The–a long time ago, a newspaper columnist affectionately called the Landrieu family the “Cajun Camelot,” and that’s the last time there was, first of all, a white mayor in the city of New Orleans before the current mayor, your dad, Moon Landrieu. What was it, 1970 to ’78, a two-term mayor, former head of the Conference of Mayors, later secretary of Housing. Senator, have you searched your own soul and conscience to make sure–there was so much blame that went around after Katrina–that you bore none of it? How–have you sorted out just what it was that happened here? SEN. MARY LANDRIEU: (D-LA): Well, Brian, first of all, no elected official could say that they didn’t make mistakes. We all did. It was an extremely tough time. But I can say proudly that I helped to lead the effort to help the federal government respond more effectively. And that was all the discussion about Landrieu’s potential culpability as part of a strong political family in the region, as Williams had much bigger catfish to fry: MR. WILLIAMS: Now I want to ask you about one of the many promises made after Katrina. I want to roll in a piece of sound from President George W. Bush after Katrina, speaking not far from here in Jackson Square. (Videotape, September 15, 2005) PRES. GEORGE W. BUSH: And tonight I also offer this pledge of the American people: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives. (End videotape) MR. WILLIAMS: Senator, you heard it. SEN. LANDRIEU: Yeah. Advertisement | ad info MR. WILLIAMS: Did it turn out to be hollow? Did it turn out… SEN. LANDRIEU: It was. MR. WILLIAMS: Do you think he was telling the truth then? SEN. LANDRIEU: Well, it, it turned out to be a hollow promise, and I’ll tell you why: Because the federal government didn’t stay and do everything they could. The federal government didn’t make it easy. They made it very, very difficult. Landrieu then went on to complain about how little money her region has received from the federal government since Katrina hit. She quoted astonishingly low numbers – in the low millions to be precise – without any challenge whatsoever from Williams about the billions of taypayer dollars that have been sent to this area since 2005.  All Williams had to do was cite figures from the Department of Homeland Security’s website to address the many billions of dollars authorized by Congress and former President Bush for Katrina relief in just the first twelve months after the storm made landfall. But that would have made Landrieu look like a liar. Potentially even more absurd, Williams didn’t ask her about last year’s Louisiana Purchase when she got $300 million for her state as a bribe from Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to change her vote in favor of healthcare reform. No, such inconvenient truths were unimportant to Williams who changed the subject to the BP oil spill: MR. WILLIAMS: Now, Senator, we should note that you were talking about wetlands before talking about wetlands was, was in vogue. And, perhaps, though, you can explain the very confusing relationship between Louisiana and oil as we look at the once-beautiful wetlands with that now characteristic oil line that’s to be found on all the grass. A lot of folks elsewhere in the country just assumed that the anger down here would come out of the oil spill, the fact that three months of oil is sitting out there in that water. A lot of folks assumed that the folks in Louisiana would be behind a stoppage until there could be a rule that if you can get oil a mile down, you should be able to stop it. What is the relationship between Louisianans, who love the great outdoors and have some of the great outdoors in all of the world, and the petroleum that comes out deep under the ground? SEN. LANDRIEU: Well, first of all, Brian, please know that people are very angry about that spill, and very disappointed in BP, and very disappointed in the subcontractors as well, and are just furious about the oil. We want to keep our waters clean. We’ve tried to keep our waters clean all these years. But we do have a strong relationship with the oil and gas industry, not just big oil, but independents and the thousands of small businesses that we built that we’re proud of that support that industry because the nation needs this oil. This nation consumes 20 million barrels of oil a day. It did the day before the Deep Horizon exploded, it does today. Now, we’re going to transition to cleaner fuels. And by the way, Louisiana is well positioned to be part of the energy future, not just our past. But that’s why people down here feel so strongly. We’ve been fishing in the same waters that we drill for oil. We’ve been navigating all of the commerce of–not only of this country, but of the world on those same waters. And yes, Brian, we recreate, we swim in those waters. And we believe with the right kind of balance in policy we can do it. So, yes, a pause was necessary. But a six-month moratorium has put a, a blanket of fear and anxiety, and it must be lifted as soon as possible. Might have been a nice time for Williams to bring up all the contributions Landrieu received from BP during the 2008 election cycle. That year, she received more from this oil company than any other member of Congress. But Williams wasn’t interested in challenging his guests:  MR. WILLIAMS: Mr. Mayor, was the administration slow off the dime when the spill happened? NEW ORLEANS MAYOR MITCH LANDRIEU: I don’t think so. They were down here pretty quickly. And, of course, this was a much different disaster than Katrina was. I can honestly say that they’ve been working very hard at it. This might have been a great time to reference a recent PPP poll about what Louisianans think about Bush’s job of handling Katrina versus Obama’s job with the oil spill (h/t NBer Gary Hall): Louisianans’ severe disapproval of Obama overall, 35-61, mirrors their disdain for his efforts in the cleanup, 32-61. George W. Bush’s handling of Hurricane Katrina, by contrast, is viewed barely negatively, 44-47; the response in June, 34-58, was more in line with Obama’s, 32-62. A full 54% now think Bush did a better job dealing with crisis than Obama, who gets the vote of only 33%. Unfortunately, Williams chose to ignore this as well, and decided to head back to Katrina: MR. WILLIAMS: How should Ray Nagin’s term as mayor be remembered, as history looks back on what happened here? MAYOR LANDRIEU: Well, that’s a, that’s a very hard thing for me to opine about, you know? MR. WILLIAMS: Try. MAYOR LANDRIEU: We’re going to let history–we’re going to let history take care of itself. I would say this. You have not seen me talk much about what happened during the storm. That was a cataclysmic event. Who knows how to judge people that went through those couple of days? I will say… MR. WILLIAMS: But you were in it, and now you have his old job. MAYOR LANDRIEU: Yeah. I don’t, I don’t think generally that it was well done. But I would say this, that subsequent to the storm, putting the city in a position to recover, as it were, I don’t think he did a good job. That’s why I ran against him the first time, and of course, it’s why I ran the second time. I really believe that this city can fix itself. But I will say this, just to put an exclamation point on President Bush’s statements a minute ago. There was huge damage, the damage was man-made. It was a result of the federal government’s negligence. And not withstanding all the incredible things that the people of America have done for us, we have not received enough money to repair the damage that was done. And when we do, we will be able to rebuild the city faster. Amazing. And that was all that was said about the mayor in the middle of this disaster. From there, Williams did an interview with actor Brad Pitt about his charitable efforts in the region, and then invited in some local celebrities that further pointed their fingers at Bush and the federal government: MR. WILLIAMS: …until we–until we recently aired our own documentary on MSNBC and NBC News, you told me you’d been in a dark radio studio on generators, you, you hadn’t seen a lot of the pictures. But now you, you think about this region so much, you’ve lived here so long, raised in the bayou south of here, four decades in New Orleans, looking back, what was it we witnessed here, what do you think went on those few days? GARLAND ROBINETTE, JOURNALIST AND RADIO HOST: To me, it was a Salvador Dali painting, it was just surreal. The United States of America couldn’t take care of itself. I’ve been to Banda Aceh, I’ve been all over the world with a company that I owned, and I’ve seen how we respond to disasters. And the very thought that for five days they couldn’t get here and do the job is just, to this day, is mind-boggling. MR. WILLIAMS: Is it too easy to throw a label on it, stamp it racism, classism? I once asked President George W. Bush on board Air Force One, I said, “Mr. President, if this had happened in Nantucket or New York or Chicago,” he interrupted me and said, “You can call me anything you want, but don’t call me a racist.” That was his response to that. What do you think was at work here? Shameful, but it was going to get worse: MR. WILLIAMS: I want to break that dull glaze by–and this is an essential part of this coverage, I believe, reminding people what it was like back then. Here is a clip from MEET THE PRESS the Sunday after Katrina that was beamed around the world. The president of Jefferson Parish, Aaron Broussard, pleading with Tim Russert and the authorities who might be watching television to send help. (Videotape, September 4, 2005) MR. AARON BROUSSARD: Nobody’s coming to get us. Nobody’s coming to get us. The secretary’s promised, everybody’s promised. They’ve had press conferences. I’m, I’m sick of the press conferences. For God sakes, shut up and send us somebody. (End videotape) MR. WILLIAMS: Aaron Broussard on live television. The research behind this special was astonishingly sub-standard; within days of Broussard’s appearance on “MTP,” it was exposed that he had lied about some of the things he told the late Tim Russert that day. Three weeks later, Russert grilled Broussard about how he had totally misrepresented the death of a colleague’s mother during his first appearance. Even worse, Broussard resigned as President of Jefferson Parish this past January in the midst of a federal corruption investigation.  Nice character witness there, Brian! But there was still more: MR. WILLIAMS: It’s yesterday, really, and it’s been five years. The children and relatives of the people at this table, I’m going to go ahead and guess, would not have gone a week without water or food because their dads, their dads’ companies would have found a way, as NBC News did, as NBC News did, to get us supplies in the central business district. They found us in Metairie in the parking lot of a used car dealer, and they made sure we had something to drink. What’s the difference? Why didn’t it matter to someone? Why wasn’t someone able to, to get supplies and get those folks out? WENDELL PIERCE, ACTOR: I think the thing that you have to remember is that we have to understand that the disaster lifted the veil of issues of race, of issues of class, not only in this city, but in the country. If we’re to move past it and truly be a part of this wonderful recovery that we’re feeling, we can’t look at it through rose-colored glasses. It is not an indictment of any one person or whatever, it’s an indictment of us all. We have to look at all of the issues that caused the fermentation of that poverty. One of the things that we can’t lose sight of is the fact that many New Orleanians heard that call from Garland Robinette on their transistors radios in the hinterlands of New Orleans, and we tried to make a Dunkirk run to that convention center–white, black, rich, poor–because they had the humanity within them when they saw those images and when they heard those voices cry out. This was an abject failure and incompetence of our government. No one’s feet have been held to the fire because of it. We can sit here and debate the pathology of what caused it–racism, classism, a lack of respect for New Orleans and this region. But does that matter if we don’t hold anyone accountable and if we forget the incompetence that was displayed during that week? We have to hold people accountable. If we’re not going to go back and hold those people accountable, make sure that we held–hold people accountable now as we move forward. And if we’re truly to move past this, we have to look at ourselves and see what is our contribution to this dysfunctional dynamic, and how can we change the paradigm, the dysfunction of class and racism, the dysfunction of education, which is the root cause of all of this. Amazing. After all, if you remove the passion from this issue and look at it from a purely logicial perspective, another conclusion has to be reached. As NewsBusters reported in March 2006, the folks at Popular Mechanics spent a great deal of time researching the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and their findings went quite contrary to the conventional wisdom both then and now: Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest-and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm’s landfall. Dozens of National Guard and Coast Guard helicopters flew rescue operations that first day-some just 2 hours after Katrina hit the coast. Hoistless Army helicopters improvised rescues, carefully hovering on rooftops to pick up survivors. On the ground, ‘guardsmen had to chop their way through, moving trees and recreating roadways,’ says Jack Harrison of the National Guard. By the end of the week, 50,000 National Guard troops in the Gulf Coast region had saved 17,000 people; 4000 Coast Guard personnel saved more than 33,000. While the press focused on FEMA’s shortcomings, this broad array of local, state and national responders pulled off an extraordinary success-especially given the huge area devastated by the storm. Computer simulations of a Katrina-strength hurricane had estimated a worst-case-scenario death toll of more than 60,000 people in Louisiana. The actual number was 1077 in that state. Once again, these facts would have gotten in the way of Williams’ agenda on Sunday, and that of liberal historian Douglas Brinkley who actually said, “Governor Blanco, during Katrina, is the one who eventually got the buses to get those people out of the convention center. And she’s the one who got the Superdome refixed, but she’s also not given credit for that.” Imagine that. The governor that badly failed her citizens during this crisis demonstrating staggering levels of incompetence was finally mentioned in this hour-long special edition of “Meet the Press” only to be commended for her efforts. That should be all readers needed to know about the total lack of impartiality and balance presented to viewers this Sunday. As I stated at the onset, the folks involved in this propagandist piece of detritus should be ashamed and embarrassed for what they’ve produced. After five years, for one of the largest and most well-funded news organizations to be able to offer no new insights or facts behind this history-changing natural disaster than that it was all caused by Bush, the federal government, and racism is nothing less than disgraceful. If this was all NBC had to say on this issue, why not just put together clips of their hideous coverage from five years ago? And they wonder why people across the fruited plain continue to switch to other sources for their news. 

Here is the original post:
‘Meet the Press’ Katrina Special: All Bush and Federal Government’s Fault

Young Money’s Mack Maine Debuts ‘I’m From New Orleans’ Video

MTV Jams’ ‘Louisiana Love’ day is paying tribute on the five-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina. By Shaheem Reid Mack Maine Photo: MTV News As we reflect on the fifth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina , MTV Jams is paying special tribute to survivors of the disaster with “Louisiana Love.” All Sunday (August 29) on the channel, you’ll see videos from New Orleans artists. MTV Jams is celebrating the strength of the people in the Gulf Coast rather than making it a day of mourning. One of the videos fans will see today is courtesy of director Scoob Doo and the Young Money family. It’s called “I’m From New Orleans” and stars YM president Mack Maine . Fellow N.O. natives Lil Wayne, Lil Chuckee and the Birdman have cameos in the vid. “The New Orleans video is basically a song with some guys from New Orleans: Lucci Lou and T@,” Mack explained to MTV News. Mack Mizzle was in New York to visit Lil Wayne at Rikers Island. “The name of the song is ‘I’m From New Orleans.’ I got pretty New Orleans on my verse. The video is pretty raw. It’s low-budget, capturing the raw and real of New Orleans. It’s a good look. It’ll make the city proud and kinda let other people see our heritage and basically how we live, our way of life.” The Cash Money/ Young Money family obviously has a well-documented history of showing us New Orleans in videos, starting back in the ’90s with such videos as Juvenile’s “Ha” and five years ago with Lil Wayne’s “Fireman.” However, since Katrina’s destruction hit, many of the signature landmarks are no longer standing in the city. “I was just in town for my birthday party, and I rode through the neighborhoods to see the new developments that are coming up and what’s being torn down,” Mack said. “A lot of the uptown part, the projects are basically gone, like the Magnolia, some of the Calliope are still up. They’re trying to give the city a new face. It’s a lot of memories gone at the end of the day. But we basically shot uptown, we caught the Superdome. Uptown, my little brother has a house. We caught some footage by him. We caught some of Hollygrove. The guys on the song are from New Orleans East. So we caught the East in there too. We tried to capture all the city. I don’t think we went on the West Bank, but shouts to the West Bank as well. Uptown, downtown and the East.” Mack says his song co-stars, Lucci Lou and T@, have worked with the YM family before, and the two are just stepping up to the spotlight now. “Lucci Lou, he was on the No Ceilings mixtape,” Mack explained. “T@ is one of the guys who works for Wayne. He started messing around with the rap and started making beats. That’s how the song came. He hit me when we was in the studio. He hit me, like, ‘Pull up some of the beats we made on the I Am Music Tour.’ I don’t write; I freestyle. I went in there and went from the verse to the hook. I didn’t know if it was nice at first. It was like 5 in the morning. I was tired. They called me like, ‘It’s a hit.’ I listened to it two days later and said, ‘It’s a nice song.’ They did their verse, and here we are.” Share your memories of Hurricane Katrina in the comments.

Go here to see the original:
Young Money’s Mack Maine Debuts ‘I’m From New Orleans’ Video