Tag Archives: democrats

President Obama Forum Attendee Laments DREAM Act Failure

Ana Roa Arr

Lady Gaga, Katy Perry React To ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Repeal

Ellen DeGeneres, Pink and more celebrate historic Senate vote on Twitter. By Mawuse Ziegbe Members of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network join Lady Gaga at the 2010 MTV VMAs Photo: Getty Images The armed forces’ controversial “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy will soon be history. On Saturday (December 18), the Senate voted to repeal the 17-year-old measure that bars openly gay men and women from serving in the military. The bill passed by a 65-31 margin, according to CNN , which included eight republicans and one independent who joined the Democrat-backed initiative. President Obama will sign the bill into law next week. “Today, the Senate has taken an historic step toward ending a policy that undermines our national security while violating the very ideals that our brave men and women in uniform risk their lives to defend. By ending ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ no longer will our nation be denied the service of thousands of patriotic Americans forced to leave the military, despite years of exemplary performance, because they happen to be gay. And no longer will many thousands more be asked to live a lie in order to serve the country they love,” the president said in a statement . Calls to dismantle the policy ramped up this year with stars such as Lady Gaga decrying the measure and demonstrations cropping up around the nation. On Wednesday, the Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who had been crusading to end the policy, tweeted to Gaga after the vote, “We did it! #DADT is a thing of the past.” Gaga, who arrived at the 2010 MTV VMAs with openly gay service members who had been discharged or left the military due to the policy, made viral videos and spoke at a September rally calling for the end of DADT, tweeted about her emotional reaction to the vote. “Can’t hold back the tears+pride. We did it!i Our voice was heard + today the Senate REPEALED DADT. A triumph for equality after 17 YEARS,” she wrote . Openly gay talk-show queen Ellen DeGeneres tweeted , “Thank you Senators for pushing us one step closer towards full equality.” Katy Perry showed her support for the repeal of DADT by responding to a missive that fellow songstress Pink retweeted. “SUPPORTING ALL OUR TROOPS!” Perry added to Pink’s retweet, “RT @Pink: Congrats 2 US!!! REPEAL of DADT & 17 years of allowing Human Rights Violations. There’s hope after all!” Former army lieutenant and gay-rights activist Dan Choi, who has called for an end to the policy since he was discharged from service after publicly coming out in 2009, also gave his take on the vote. “Thank you, Democrats, for your leadership,” he tweeted . “There: I said it. Also, thank you 8 Republicans. You’re on the right side of history.” MTV News also caught up with student Bridget Todd , who once questioned President Obama about DADT during the commander-in-chief’s “A Conversation with President Obama” forum in October. Although Todd said she was skeptical of the president’s commitment to ending the policy after the Obama administration asked for stay blocking a judge’s ruling that the measure is unconstitutional, she said the Senate vote has restored some of her faith in the U.S. leader. “I think it’s fantastic. I’m over the moon about it,” Todd said. “It’s sort of strange that it’s 2010 and we’re dealing with this so I’m happy that it’s done, I’m happy that it’s gonna be over with. “I think I said that he displayed an alleged commitment to gay equality,” she continued. “I think that this sort of proves that perhaps he is actually committed to these issues. They’re not just sort of political talking points that you use to get elected — that this is something that he is willing to make happen.” What do you think about the Senate voting to repeal DADT? Let us know in the comments! Related Videos Lady Gaga Rallies Against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Related Artists Lady Gaga Katy Perry

View original post here:
Lady Gaga, Katy Perry React To ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Repeal

Turncoat Republicans Vote for Massive Earmarks…Say Bye Bye!

Senate Democrats won over just enough Republicans to move forward Tuesday night on a controversial $410 billion spending bill by the end of the night Tuesday. But it may come as no surprise that almost all of the Republican senators who voted for the bill have billions of dollars worth of earmarks in the package. The earmark-mania is not unique to either party — both Democrats and Republicans contributed to what Taxpayers for Common Sense estimates is 8,570 disclosed earmarks worth $7.7 billion in the bill that would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/10/gop-cross-overs-earmarks-gain-billion… added by: congoboy

Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg Named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

Magazine praises Zuckerberg for wiring ‘a twelfth of humanity’ into single network. By Gil Kaufman Mark Zuckerberg Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Yes, being the youngest self-made billionaire at 26 is impressive. And having an award-nominated movie about your company’s origins become a big-screen hit is not to shabby either. But one of the reasons Time magazine chose Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg as its “Person of the Year” is this little fact: “In less than seven years, Zuckerberg wired together a twelfth of humanity in a single network.” Praising the Facebook boss for creating a universal living room that has brought the planet that much closer together, the magazine wrote that “we have entered the Facebook age, and Mark Zuckerberg is the man who brought us here.” In a year in which Zuckerberg’s American tale was brought to life by director David Fincher in the hit “The Social Network” — which didn’t always paint a flattering portrait of the billionaire boss — and Zuck joined an initiative among the mega-wealthy to donate the majority of his fortune to charity, the bottom line for Time was the way in which Facebook has fundamentally altered the way we communicate, spend our time and organize our social lives. Born in 1984, the same year the first Macintosh computer from Apple was introduced, Time said that Zuckerberg is both a product of his wired generation and an architect of our digital world. “The social-networking platform he invented is closing in on 600 million users. In a single day, about a billion new pieces of content are posted on Facebook. It is the connective tissue for nearly a tenth of the planet,” the magazine wrote about the platform created by the T-shirt-wearing Harvard dropout. “Facebook is now the third-largest country on earth and surely has more information about its citizens than any government does.” Zuckerberg beat out the year’s runners-up, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange — who launched a nefarious digital revolution of his own — and the upstart Tea Party political movement, whose impact was felt in the 2010 midterm elections that swept Democrats out of the majority in the House of Representatives while narrowing the gap in the Senate. Like those two rogue movements, “Zuckerberg doesn’t have a whole lot of veneration for traditional authority,” the magazine wrote. “In a sense, Zuckerberg and Assange are two sides of the same coin. Both express a desire for openness and transparency. While Assange attacks big institutions and governments through involuntary transparency with the goal of disempowering them, Zuckerberg enables individuals to voluntarily share information with the idea of empowering them. Assange sees the world as filled with real and imagined enemies; Zuckerberg sees the world as filled with potential friends.” While his youth and relatively modest life experience might make the designation seem premature, Time noted that “Person of the Year” is not and never has been intended as an honor. Case in point, along with such winners as John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., other designees have included dictators Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin and disgraced U.S. President Richard Nixon. “It is a recognition of the power of individuals to shape our world,” the magazine explained. “For connecting more than half a billion people and mapping the social relations among them (something that has never been done before); for creating a new system of exchanging information that has become both indispensable and sometimes a little scary; and finally, for changing how we all live our lives in ways that are innovative and even optimistic, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is Time ‘s 2010 Person of the Year.” While they weren’t in the running for “Person of the Year,” among the other notable deemed “People Who Mattered” by the magazine were Justin Bieber, Sandra Bullock, Lady Gaga, the cast of “Glee,” Lebron James, the cast of “Jersey Shore,” Conan O’Brien, Kanye West and Betty White. Do you think Mark Zuckerberg was the right choice for Time ‘s Person of the Year? Sound off in the comments. Related Videos ‘The Social Network’ Clips

Read more here:
Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg Named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg Named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

Magazine praises Zuckerberg for wiring ‘a twelfth of humanity’ into single network. By Gil Kaufman Mark Zuckerberg Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images Yes, being the youngest self-made billionaire at 26 is impressive. And having an award-nominated movie about your company’s origins become a big-screen hit is not to shabby either. But one of the reasons Time magazine chose Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg as its “Person of the Year” is this little fact: “In less than seven years, Zuckerberg wired together a twelfth of humanity in a single network.” Praising the Facebook boss for creating a universal living room that has brought the planet that much closer together, the magazine wrote that “we have entered the Facebook age, and Mark Zuckerberg is the man who brought us here.” In a year in which Zuckerberg’s American tale was brought to life by director David Fincher in the hit “The Social Network” — which didn’t always paint a flattering portrait of the billionaire boss — and Zuck joined an initiative among the mega-wealthy to donate the majority of his fortune to charity, the bottom line for Time was the way in which Facebook has fundamentally altered the way we communicate, spend our time and organize our social lives. Born in 1984, the same year the first Macintosh computer from Apple was introduced, Time said that Zuckerberg is both a product of his wired generation and an architect of our digital world. “The social-networking platform he invented is closing in on 600 million users. In a single day, about a billion new pieces of content are posted on Facebook. It is the connective tissue for nearly a tenth of the planet,” the magazine wrote about the platform created by the T-shirt-wearing Harvard dropout. “Facebook is now the third-largest country on earth and surely has more information about its citizens than any government does.” Zuckerberg beat out the year’s runners-up, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange — who launched a nefarious digital revolution of his own — and the upstart Tea Party political movement, whose impact was felt in the 2010 midterm elections that swept Democrats out of the majority in the House of Representatives while narrowing the gap in the Senate. Like those two rogue movements, “Zuckerberg doesn’t have a whole lot of veneration for traditional authority,” the magazine wrote. “In a sense, Zuckerberg and Assange are two sides of the same coin. Both express a desire for openness and transparency. While Assange attacks big institutions and governments through involuntary transparency with the goal of disempowering them, Zuckerberg enables individuals to voluntarily share information with the idea of empowering them. Assange sees the world as filled with real and imagined enemies; Zuckerberg sees the world as filled with potential friends.” While his youth and relatively modest life experience might make the designation seem premature, Time noted that “Person of the Year” is not and never has been intended as an honor. Case in point, along with such winners as John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., other designees have included dictators Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin and disgraced U.S. President Richard Nixon. “It is a recognition of the power of individuals to shape our world,” the magazine explained. “For connecting more than half a billion people and mapping the social relations among them (something that has never been done before); for creating a new system of exchanging information that has become both indispensable and sometimes a little scary; and finally, for changing how we all live our lives in ways that are innovative and even optimistic, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg is Time ‘s 2010 Person of the Year.” While they weren’t in the running for “Person of the Year,” among the other notable deemed “People Who Mattered” by the magazine were Justin Bieber, Sandra Bullock, Lady Gaga, the cast of “Glee,” Lebron James, the cast of “Jersey Shore,” Conan O’Brien, Kanye West and Betty White. Do you think Mark Zuckerberg was the right choice for Time ‘s Person of the Year? Sound off in the comments. Related Videos ‘The Social Network’ Clips

See the original post:
Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg Named Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

Bending Over Didn’t Work Out Too Well For Obama

Republicans poring over a 1,924-page overarching spending bill proposed by Democrats to cover the rest of the fiscal year are threatening to grind the legislation to a halt, citing massive earmark spending, which, if passed, would be enacted into law without debate in the full Senate. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/14/revolt-republicans-angry-omnibus-budg… Let me get this straight. Republicans are willing to shutdown government after Obama risked loosing the support of his base to support their tax cuts. Got it! added by: tverdell

Obama’s job approval rating hits a new low

Is President Obama in serious danger of losing re-election in 2012? A new McClatchy/Marist Poll released over the weekend found Obama's job approval rating at just 42 percent — the lowest number of his presidency. One reason Obama's numbers have taken a turn for the worse: The president has lost ground with Democrats in recent weeks. According to the poll, 74 percent of Democrats approve of the job Obama is doing — a sign that he remains enormously popular with his base. But that number is down nearly 9 percentage points since November, according to McClatchy. Meanwhile his disapproval rating nearly doubled, moving from 11 percent to 21 percent in the last month. Among self-described liberals, his approval rating has dropped from 78 percent to 69 percent since November. At the same time, his standing among independent voters — the group that propelled him to the White House in '08 — remained dismal. Just 39 percent of independents approve of Obama's job performance, compared with 50 percent who disapprove. That's down more than 20 points since Obama was elected. Matched up against early 2012 contenders, the poll finds that if the election were held today, Obama would narrowly lose to Republican Mitt Romney, 44 percent to 46 percent — though that's within the poll's 3.5 percent margin of error. He would narrowly beat former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, 47 percent to 43 percent. http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20101213/pl_yblog_theticket/obamas-job-a… added by: im1mjrpain

Democrats Too Dumb to Realize Obama Won Tax Deal

Barack Obama pulled off a huge coup with his tax-cut deal, but House Democrats are too dim to realize it. Obama slyly negotiated “the biggest stimulus in American history,” complains Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post. Republicans boast that this is their kind of stimulus—meaning mostly tax cuts. “That’s consolation? Stimulus II will still blow another near-$1 trillion hole in the budget.” “Obama is no fool,” Krauthammer writes. “While getting Republicans to boost his own reelection chances, he gets them to make a mockery of their newfound, second-chance, post-Bush, Tea-Party, this-time-we’re-serious persona of debt-averse fiscal responsibility.” It’s the “swindle of the year,” yet Democrats are so incensed that some are calling for a primary challenge against Obama. “Really now?” They’re going to primary the first black president? “Not even Democrats are that stupid.” http://www.newser.com/story/107326/democrats-too-dumb-to-realize-obama-won-tax-d… added by: unimatrix0

Democrats Too Dumb to Realize Obama Won Tax Deal

Barack Obama pulled off a huge coup with his tax-cut deal, but House Democrats are too dim to realize it. Obama slyly negotiated “the biggest stimulus in American history,” complains Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post. Republicans boast that this is their kind of stimulus—meaning mostly tax cuts. “That’s consolation? Stimulus II will still blow another near-$1 trillion hole in the budget.” “Obama is no fool,” Krauthammer writes. “While getting Republicans to boost his own reelection chances, he gets them to make a mockery of their newfound, second-chance, post-Bush, Tea-Party, this-time-we’re-serious persona of debt-averse fiscal responsibility.” It’s the “swindle of the year,” yet Democrats are so incensed that some are calling for a primary challenge against Obama. “Really now?” They’re going to primary the first black president? “Not even Democrats are that stupid.” http://www.newser.com/story/107326/democrats-too-dumb-to-realize-obama-won-tax-d… added by: unimatrix0

Republicans block Senate health aid bill for 9.11 workers

Republican senators blocked Democratic legislation on Thursday that sought to provide medical care to rescue workers and others who became ill as a result of breathing in toxic fumes, dust and smoke at the site of the World Trade Center attack in 2001. The 9/11 health bill, a version of which was approved by the House of Representatives in September, was among several initiatives that Senate Democrats had hoped to approve before the close of the 111th Congress. Supporters believe this was their last real opportunity to have the bill passed. The action by the Senate created huge uncertainty over the bill’s future. Its proponents were working on Thursday to salvage the legislation, with one possibility being to have it inserted into a large tax-cut bill that Republicans and Democrats are trying to pass before Congress ends its current session. Such a move seemed unlikely, since it might complicate passage of the tax package, which includes a provision that President Obama sought in return for backing the continuation of tax cuts for all income levels that Republicans wanted: an extension of unemployment benefits. In a vote largely along party lines, the Senate rejected a procedural move by Democrats to end debate on the 9/11 health bill and to bring it to a vote; 60 yes votes were needed, but the move received 57, with 42 votes against. Republicans have been raising concerns about how to pay for the $7.4 billion measure, while Democrats, led by Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand of New York, have argued that there was a moral obligation to assist those who put their lives at risk during rescue and cleanup operations at ground zero. The bill is formally known as the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, named after a New York police detective who participated in the rescue efforts at ground zero. He later developed breathing complications that were common to first responders at the site, and he died in January 2006. The cause of his death became a source of debate after the city’s medical examiner concluded that it was not directly related to the attacks. After the vote, Representative Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, a chief sponsor of the bill in the House, argued that Democrats should include the 9/11 health bill in the larger tax-cut legislation and, in the process, dare Republicans to oppose it in that context. Ms. Maloney added that the tax bill was the one piece of legislation that “Republicans won’t leave this town without passing.” As the day wore on, it appeared increasingly unlikely that the Senate would include a provision providing health care for ground zero workers in any tax package it brought to the floor, according to senior Capitol Hill officials. But supporters of the 9/11 legislation said there was a possibility they could persuade Democratic leaders in the House to include it in any tax-cut plan that the chamber approved and win Senate approval during negotiations over differences in measures passed by the two chambers. The Senate action was a blow to sponsors of the bill, who mobilized a network of allies across the political spectrum to lobby on its behalf, including the New York City police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. Ms. Gillibrand, the chief sponsor in the Senate, even reached out to former President George W. Bush. But her aides say Mr. Bush did not respond to her entreaties. cont. added by: JanforGore