Tag Archives: democrats

Is there ONE Obama Campaign Promise Kept? Do We have ANY FREEDOMS or Justice left in this Country? NO

Obama has not kept one campaign promise, since taking office! The wars are continuing, the renditions are continuing, there is more spying on the people! There is no balancing of the budget, in fact for the first time in history, the Congress did not even bother doing a budget for 2011, which started October 1st. The spending is out of control! Obama's base is now fully realizing he has not done anything for the people, he continues to out Bush, Bush! Even his solid media base is starting to come out in the open, including Olbermann, who has always been behind Obama. But he even blasted him last night for all his campaign promises broken, he took Obama to task on the tax breaks for the rich! In fact Olbermann, said Obama is a failure in so many words and says, he doubts he would even be nominated for the 2012 Presidential election by the Democrats! We have been going down a socialist road in a police state. If people don't realize that… then they are totally asleep. Even those who have stood behind Obama, need to wake up and see where this country is headed. I will say, I voted for Obama. I bought all that “Hope and Change and Yes We Can”! I believed we would get back to the free country we once were. I was sadly wrong, and somehow I knew that instinctively at his inauguration. I have never watched an Obama speech etc. since. We have gone down a road of losing most of our freedoms. If people still think we are free, they need to take a closer look at the policies enacted the last couple of years and all the bills the Congress and Senate have passed. Also look at the things they have not done, including any federal budget for 2011. Has one MSM outlet taken the government to task on us carrying on without a Federal budget? NO! It has not been discussed. Why? It is our constitution that keeps being trampled on. In fact is there much left of the constitution lived by, from this government? http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/ added by: riverratt50

Senate DADT Vote Fails

Supporters of “don't ask, don't tell” repeal in the current lame-duck session of Congress were dealt a major blow Thursday when the U.S. Senate failed to move forward on the national defense bill. The vote to proceed to debate on the defense bill, of which DADT repeal is a component, was 57-40 —three votes shy of the 60 votes that Democrats needed. Though Republican senator Susan Collins of Maine voted to support moving forward on the defense bill, no Republicans colleague followed suit. Senators crucial to repeal voted No, including senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, and Olympia Snowe of Maine. The failed vote comes after intense negotiations in the senate, where independent Sen. Joe Lieberman served as a de facto intermediary between Democratic Senate majority leader Reid and Collins, who supports the repeal of “don't ask, don't tell” but urged a “fair and open” process for the Defense Authorization spending bill. On Wednesday evening, Reid had postponed a full vote in the Senate on the bill that includes language to repeal the military's ban on openly gay and lesbian troops. Reid on Thursday criticized Republican opposition to moving ahead on the defense bill as harmful not only to DADT repeal, but to the armed forces as a whole. “Despite the critical importance for our troops, for our nation, and for justice that we get this bill done, we have not been able to reach an agreement,” Reid said earlier this afternoon. “And I regret to say that it is our troops who will pay the price for our inability to overcome partisan political posturing.” Update: Servicemembers United executive director Alex Nicholson called on Congress to pass DADT repeal as a stand-alone bill, issuing the following statement after the vote: “This was a major failure on the part of the Senate to simply do its job and pass an annual defense authorization bill. Politics prevailed over responsibility today, and now more than one million American servicemembers, including tens of thousands of gay and lesbian troops, are worse off as a result. “Since the votes are there in isolation, the Senate should still consider a stand-alone bill to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' law before adjourning for the winter holidays,” Nicholson said. added by: TimALoftis

Vieira to Axelrod on Tax Cut Deal: ‘Why Shouldn’t Americans Look At This As a Disaster in the Making?’

NBC's Meredith Vieira, on Wednesday's Today show, hit David Axelrod repeatedly from the left as she lectured the White House senior adviser that the left is “furious” at Barack Obama for making a deal with the GOP on tax cuts as she

Obama’s Plan to Become Washington’s ‘Last Reasonable Man’ [Video]

Barack Obama gave a definitive press conference this afternoon — excoriating Republican “hostage takers” and “sanctimonious” Democrats alike, and outlining a clear strategy for centrism. And he kicked it off by getting angry. More

Limbaugh’s Liberal Howlers, and the Media Bias That Surrounded Them

December's Limbaugh Letter has these choice quotes from Speaker Pelosi on the 63-seat bloodbath of the House Democrats. “We didn't lose the election because of me…I'm the most significant attractor of support for the Democrats.” She said this on National Public Radio on the November 12 Morning Edition newscast. I went back to find out what did the interviewer say before and after this laughable blast? Anchor Renee Montagne asked about being “successfully demonized” by the GOP: MONTAGNE: Getting back to the politics, you have been quite successfully demonized by the Republicans. How are you going to keep that from hurting your party more than it already has? PELOSI: Well, let me say this when you say more than it already has. The reason the election results are what they are is because we have nine-and-half percent unemployment in our country. We didn't lose the election because of me. read more

Read more:
Limbaugh’s Liberal Howlers, and the Media Bias That Surrounded Them

Mainstream media promotes ‘centrist’ Third Party propaganda

You heard it here first! The Democrats and Republicans are both finished as viable parties, so now the mainstream media is pushing a new, but phony third-party centrist paradigm. Phony ‘Centrist’ Third Party Propaganda Escalates http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/third_party_245.html On Nov. 6, both Bob Herbert and Charles M. Blow —conventional “mainstream” pundits of the classic NY Times stripe—had side-by-side columns on the NY Times’s popular op-ed page, trumpeting the proposition that both the “liberal Democrats” and the “conservative Republicans” are politically, intellectually and, for all intents and purposes, morally bankrupt. The nation is endangered, they wrote, unless there are solutions and saviors that emerge outside the conventional liberal-conservative paradigm to which Americans have become accustomed through the “two party” system that now prevails. Writing in the Times, Herbert—in his “Tone-Deaf in DC” column—stated flatly: Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are offering voters the kind of change that they seem so desperately to want. . . .What voters want is leadership that will help them through an economic nightmare and fix a country that has been pitched into a state of sharp decline. They long for leaders with a clear and compelling vision of a better America and a road map for getting there. That leadership has long been AWOL. The hope in the tumultuous elections of 2008 was that it would come from Mr. Obama and the Democrats, but that hope, after just two years, is on life support. . . .The Democrats are in disarray because it’s a party that lacks a spine. The Republicans, conversely, fight like wild people whether they’re in the majority or not. What neither party is doing is offering a bold, coherent plan to get the nation’s economy in good shape and create jobs, to bring our young men and women home from the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, to rebuild the education system in a way that will prepare the next generation for the great challenges of the 21st century . . . . added by: maasanova

FCC’s ‘Net neutrality’ plan would permit super-tiers, network traffic throttling

By Stephen C. Webster Wednesday, December 1st, 2010 — 1:08 pm Internet providers will not be subjected to so-called “Net neutrality” rules and may experiment with tiered, usage-based pricing and “network management” practices, according to new rules being considered by the Federal Communications Commission this month. Advocates of Net neutrality had hoped the regulatory agency would mandate Internet service providers treat all traffic equally: one of the Web's founding principles. Instead, the FCC's Internet regulations adopts many proposals by search and telecom giants Google and Verizon, with the caveat that wireless telephone providers not block competing voice applications. In a speech, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski specified that the FCC would permit ISPs to charge heavy bandwidth users even more, creating a tiered pricing structure. ISPs would also be able to charge fees to businesses serving large quantities of data. The announcement is a victory for Comcast, the nation's largest cable Internet provider, which recently forced a bandwidth toll upon Netflix partner Level 3. The company called Comcast's move “extortion” but agreed to their conditions to prevent any service interruptions. “With this action, Comcast demonstrates the risk of a 'closed' Internet, where a retail broadband Internet access provider decides whether and how their subscribers interact with content,” the company's chief legal officer said in a media advisory. Comcast insisted the move had nothing to do with Net neutrality. The company has been leading the charge among ISPs to establish tiered-based pricing systems. Comcast admitted in 2008 that it uses “network management” practices to speed up some data transfers and slow down others, and users of peer-to-peer file sharing services have complained to the FCC that the provider has blocked their transfers altogether. Tiered pricing structures are already in place for many communications providers like AT&T and Cricket, which offer wireless broadband services. Verizon said it would implement similar pricing structures in the coming months. The FCC's rules would permit the practice on wired networks as well. Both Comcast and Time Warner, two of America's largest wired broadband providers, have already experimented with the practice. A Texas-based trial run of Time Warner's bandwidth caps saw users paying nearly $30 a month for 768 kilobits-per-second access, with a limit of 5 gigabytes per month and a $1 fee for each gigabyte they went over. One step-up on their pricing tier had users paying nearly $55 for true broadband speeds of 15 megabits-per-second, with a limit of 40 gigabytes per month. Public advocates say the move may ultimately force heavy Internet users to consume less bandwidth and stay tied to television subscriptions over cable and satellite. Comcast, which is in the process of merging with NBC-Universal, stands to benefit tremendously from the arrangement. The American Cable Association's (ACA) claimed the merger “will send monthly cable bills higher by billions of dollars over the next decade.” Major corporations have long sought a way to charge and earn more for bandwidth, ever since Enron attempted to create a bandwidth trading market where space in data pipes would be traded as a commodity like oil or gold. On wired Internet, which is expected to dramatically decrease in relevance in the coming years as fourth-generation wireless networks proliferate, a “public Internet” would be protected from bandwidth throttling. Companies, however, would be permitted to experiment with establishing super-tiers for preferred traffic, but must justify why individual services should be separated from the public Internet. The FCC would additionally require broadband providers to disclose their network management practices. The chairman's proposal lines up closely with a bill proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), who campaigned on pledges to institute Net neutrality rules. His bill, however, completely undermined those principles, but Democrats scrapped the legislation in Sept. The commission was expected to vote on the measure during it's Dec. 21st meeting. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/fcc-puts-net-neutrality-dec-agenda/?utm_sourc… added by: treewolf39

CBS Issues ‘Gridlock Alert,’ Warns That GOP ‘Put A Halt on Cooperating’

At the top of Wednesday's CBS Early Show, fill-in co-host Erica Hill fretted over Republicans pledging to focus solely on economic issues in the lame duck session of Congress: “Gridlock alert. Just one day after promising to work together while meeting with President Obama, GOP leaders may now put a halt on cooperating with Democrats on Capitol Hill. So will Washington find itself at a standstill?” Moments later, co-host Harry Smith lamented how “the spirit of cooperation between Republicans and Democrats after yesterday's White House summit seemed to fade quickly.” In the report that followed, senior White House correspondent Bill Plante solely blamed the GOP for the division: “There are new questions this morning about just how sincere the spirit of cooperation in Washington really is. CBS News has confirmed that Senate Republicans have collected signatures on a letter which pledges to block everything unrelated to tax cuts and spending during the lame duck congress.” read more

Continued here:
CBS Issues ‘Gridlock Alert,’ Warns That GOP ‘Put A Halt on Cooperating’

Despite massive protests, US Senate passes S 510 Food Safety Bill

(NaturalNews) The new Food Tyranny Act — called the “Food Safety Modernization Act” in the U.S. Senate — has been passed by the senate today. It would give the FDA vast new powers to criminalize and imprison farmers and food producers while doing absolutely nothing to address to real root of the food contamination problem: Factory animal farm operations (which are regulated under the USDA, not the FDA). The bill passed 73 to 25, with Sen Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma) emerging as the greatest “voice of reason” in the debate. His last-ditch amendment to reduce the scale of the bill was defeated this morning. Here's the official vote record:http://www.senate.gov/legislative/L… Notably,there wasn't a single Democrat who opposed the bill. This bill, as originally written, would have outlawed most nutritional supplements through “harmonization” with European laws. It also would have authorized ten-year prison sentences for farmers sellingraw milkto their neighbors. Both of those provisions were eventually stripped out of the bill thanks to some last-minute amendments, but it gives you an idea of the outright police state mentality of the original bill authors who attempted to put in place completegovernmentcontrol over food, gardens, rawmilkand more. To give you an idea ofhow cluelessU.S. Senators are aboutfood, the New York Times is reporting that whenSenatestaff members met to discuss this bill, they would eat Starburst candies and jellybeans. As the NYT reports, “In the midst of negotiations, the negotiators — nearly allwomen– took a field trip to a nearby food market so that a Republican staff member could teach theDemocratshow to buy high-quality steaks.” So what we have here is a new foodtyrannylaw that was essentially negotiated by a group of women who eatdeadfoods, animals products and candy. No wonder they still don't get it. Thecontaminationof lettuce and other fresh produce is caused byfactory animals farms, not by produce farms. (E.coli can only thrive in the digestive tracts of animals, not plants.) The “small farms” exclusion will soon be meaningless The Tester Amendment of the bill did manage to excludesomesmallerfarmersfrom the more tyrannical provisions of the bill. As currently stated, this would exclude small farms that sell less than $500,000 worth of food and which sell most of their food locally. However, Senators failed to consider what's going to happen when theFederal Reservekeeps printing counterfeitmoney, devaluing the dollar and causing massive food price inflation. A farm that right now produces merely $100,000 worth of food (which could be a small, two-person farm) will soon find itself producing $500,000 worth of food (or more) due to the rapidly falling value of the U.S. dollar. This is how the Federal Reserve's money counterfeiting actions will further destroyAmericaand place small family farms under the tyranny ofthe FDA. What's next: Defeat the bill in committee The Senate version of the bill must now be reconciled with the House version that was passed last year. This reconciliation committee must hammer out the differences between the two bills. Democrats are urgently rushing to do this during their “lame duck” session in order to avoid moreRepublicansgetting involved who would seek to scale back thepowerand size of the federal government. Some House Democrats are even suggesting they would support passing the Senate version of the bill as it is written, without requiring any changes whatsoever, just to rush it through before the end of the year.NaturalNewsand other health freedom organizations intend to fight this effort, hoping to stall the bill until the newCongresscan enter the picture and hopefully interject some common sense into the negotiations. Please don't feed the monster If signed into law by the President (who is sure to sign it), this Food Safety Bill would provide yet more power and funding to one of the most dangerous monsters our nation has ever known: TheFDA. This is the agency responsible for the death of more Americans than all the wars our nation has ever been involved with — combined! ( http://www.naturalnews.com/030461_S…) The idea that we're going to save a few lives from food poisoning while subjectingeveryoneto yet another layer ofBig Governmenttyranny is so abhorrent and downright evil that if our country's founding fathers saw all this going on, they would be stunned into silence that it's happening in “the land of the free.” Fresh milk being criminalized? You've got to be kidding… Only they're not kidding. The FDA is the agency that has raided vitamin companies ( http://www.naturalnews.com/021791.html ), arrestednutritional supplementmanufacturers and ordered the destruction of books containing stevia recipes. This is the agency that censors the scientific truth aboutnaturalfoods like cherries and walnuts ( http://www.naturalnews.com/029698_c…) while promoting the outright fraud and quackery of the pharmaceutical industry. And now the FDA is to be rewarded for its malfeasance with yet MORE power andauthority? This is how Washington works, folks. The government always thinks it's here to save you, and the Democrats want Big Government to be your nanny and “take care of you.” (The Republicans, for their part, just want to bail out the wealthy banksters with your money.) And yet, when it all comes down to it, these people are justtyrantswho have forgotten American history and abandoned the Constitution and its founding principles. Mark my words: Five years down the road, when the FDA's armed “food police” are running rampant across America, arresting farmers and imprisoning lettuce growers, people will be appalled, and they'll wonder, “How could we have let this happen!?” The answer is right here: You let it happen because you allowed Big Government to rule overthe food supply. And if there's one thing we know about Big Government, it's thatit always wants to get bigger. It always wants more power. More authority. More funding. And more excuses to function as a dictatorship that rules over the American people. The Food Safety Modernization Act is to thefood supplywhat the Patriot Act is to the Bill of Rights. We must make every effort to prevent this from becoming law, lest we find ourselves living under afood dictatorshipwhere only dead, fumigated or irradiated food will be allowed to be sold to the public. The “food irradiation plot” has been the plan from the very beginning of all this ( http://www.naturalnews.com/023015_f…) . Of course, once the real food is all criminalized and outlawed, there's alwayssoylent green. That might not be too far off, come to think of it. Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/030576_Food_Safety_S_510.html#ixzz16nMK85q5 ARTICLES RELATED TO THIS ARTICLE: •The Honest Food Guide empowers consumers with independent information about foods and health •Interview with “Kevala” Karen Parker, master raw foods chef •Cigarettes, Lies, and Pet Food Advertising •The true horrors of pet food revealed: Prepare to be shocked by what goes into dog food and cat food •Interview: Raw food guru David Wolfe explores the healing energy of living foods •Boku Super Food: An Astonishing New Premium Superfood Product Reviewed by the Health Ranger Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030576_Food_Safety_S_510.html#ixzz16nNAqgn4 added by: GLOBALPOLITICAL

Most Support DADT Repeal, But Tea Party Opposed

A survey released Monday finds strong support for allowing openly gay and lesbian soldiers to serve in the military, but key groups that traditionally support Republicans oppose the idea. The survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press and the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, shows that 58% of adults favor allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly, whereas 27% said they opposed allowing it. A majority of both men and women, as well as both Democrats and independents also support allowing open service. Currently, gays and lesbians are permitted to serve in the military under the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy only if they do not publicly reveal their sexuality. According the poll, Republicans are divided on whether to allow open service by gays and lesbians — 40% of Republicans favor it and 44% oppose. Perhaps as important, key groups likely to have an influence on Republican policies are even more opposed to allowing open service. The Pew report notes that among those who said they “agree with the Tea Party” only 38% favor and 48% oppose allowing open servece. Similarly, only 34% of white evangelical Protestants favor and 48% oppose allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly. Lack of Republican support could prevent the Obama administration from ending the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, especially if Congress doesn't vote on ending the policy before the end of this year's lame-duck session. Ending the policy during a lame-duck session may not be popular even if a majority do support repeal, however — a recent McClatchy Company poll by Marist College found that registered voters were divided on repealing the policy during the current Congress, with 47% saying the current Democratic Congress should repeal the policy and 48% saying they should not repeal it “so they continue to serve but not openly.” Another recent poll by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal found that 50% of adults supported allowing open service but 48% either supported continuing the current policy or not permitting service at all when explicitly offered those options. The Pew poll was conducted Nov. 4-7 among 1,255 adults, and had a 3.5% margin of error. Results among subgroups have a higher margin of error. added by: TimALoftis