Tag Archives: internet

Harvey Pekar: In His Own Words

MTV News caught up with the late comics icon last September. By Eric Ditzian, with reporting by Rick Marshall Harvey Pekar Photo: Evan Agostini/ Getty Images “American Splendor” author Harvey Pekar died early Monday (July 12) at the age of 70, leaving behind a voluminous exploration of his grumpy musings and everyman life experiences, his anxieties and his foibles, his pals and his demons. Pekar’s comics, illustrated by the likes of legend R. Crumb, were like a mid-’70s version of a blog, an almost living journal in which the author committed every triumph and every indignity to the page. He toiled as an underground comic for years, popping up every so often on “Late Night With David Letterman” for memorably disastrous appearances. Then in 2003, Paul Giamatti played Pekar in the Sundance-winning, Oscar-nominated biopic “American Splendor,” and Pekar’s work went from cult object to well-known commodity. Last September, MTV News had the opportunity to chat with Pekar as he launched “The Pekar Project,” a new webcomic series. As we look back and celebrate the life and work of a true artist, here is Harvey Pekar in his own words: On His Writing Process : “It’s real easy for me to write a lot of stories. I just go and I live through something and I go home and write about it. It’s that quick.” On Artistic Innovation : “I’d like to see the comics’ style expanded. I’d like to see artists synthesize traditional comics arts style with fine-arts styles or whatever. I like to see innovation. I don’t like it when an art form becomes stagnant.” On Writing His Own Webcomics : “It’s not that I got anything against technology. It’s that technology has something against me. I have nothing against [publishing] stuff on the computer, even though I can’t use one. … I’ve just been writing stuff as it comes to me. I haven’t thought as, ‘Let me write some kind of a major opus.’ I want to see what happens. I’ll stand behind what I did.” On Comics Writers Turning to the Internet : “I think it was meant to be. When the Internet came about, that was the logical place for everyone to turn. If you look at blogs, a lot of them are memoirs or opinion pieces — stuff that’s been done in the past. Blogs are fairly short, and they’re used on the Internet. I don’t think the content of a lot of the blogs is very different. I think the medium is different, and you’re able to reach huge audiences with a minimal amount of spending.” On His Love of Jazz : “Jazz is in a very, very precarious situation right now. A respectable-sized audience hasn’t really been able to follow developments in jazz since the free jazz movement in the ’60s. Some of them can’t even get with John Coltrane. Audiences are diminishing more and more rapidly. Some of the top young musicians with something new to say can’t get record companies to put out their stuff. Jazz won’t die exactly. Jazz musicians are all going to be playing old music if they want to make a living at it, like what Wynton Marsalis is doing.” Share your memories of Harvey Pekar’s work in the comments below.

Original post:
Harvey Pekar: In His Own Words

Most Transparent Administration Ever Makes Effective Reporting from Gulf a Felony

Effectively reporting on the Gulf oil spill is now a Class D felony, punishable by a fine of up to $40,000. That’s right, the most transparent administration in history has made it a felony, effective July 1, to get within 65 feet of what the Coast Guard determines are essential recovery efforts. According to Anderson Cooper, officials tried to up that number to 300 feet. Cooper, who claimed federal officials prevented CNN on two occasions from taking photographs in the gulf, seemed frustrated when he reported on the new laws the day they went into effect. The press is “not the enemy here” he pleaded. The new policies, he said, make it “very easy to hide failure, and hide incompetence.” Cooper also let loose this zinger: “Transparency is apparently not a priority with [Coast Guard Commandant] Thad Allen these days.” Ouch (full video and transcript below the fold – h/t Ron Robinson ). This is but the latest in a string of incidents that seem to have much of the country — and if Cooper is any indicator, at least a few journalists — questioning the sincerity of candidate Obama’s pledges of transparency, openness, and respect for the press. But these new regulations on press coverage of the spill have not garnered as much attention as perhaps they should — certainly not as much as similar moves during the Bush administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina (a fact that Cooper notes). Shortly after the Hurricane hit, according to the Washington Post , “FEMA refused to take reporters and photographers along on boats seeking victims in flooded areas, saying they would take up valuable space needed in the recovery effort and asked them not to take pictures of the dead.” The Post touted claims that the FEMA policy was “in line with the Bush administration’s ban on images of flag-draped U.S. military coffins returning from the Iraq war” — clearly drawing a comparison to other Bush policies rife with accusations of politically-motivated censorship. So far, the Post is silent on the criminalization — a much stronger statement of administration policy than the refusal to allow embedded reporters on rescue efforts — of media coverage in the Gulf. With a scant few exceptions, the legacy media are silent on the issue. But for his part, and to his credit, Cooper issued a heartfelt call for more press transparency: …the Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping photographers and reporters and anyone else from coming within 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches — 65 feet. Now, in order to get closer, you have to get direct permission from the Coast Guard captain of the Port of New Orleans. You have to call up the guy. What this means is that oil-soaked birds on islands surrounded by boom, you can’t get close enough to take that picture. Shots of oil on beaches with booms, stay 65 feet away. Pictures of oil-soaked booms uselessly laying in the water because they haven’t been collected like they should, you can’t get close enough to see that. And, believe me, that is out there. But you only know that if you get close to it, and now you can’t without permission. Violators could face a fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges. What’s even more extraordinary is that the Coast Guard tried to make the exclusion zone 300 feet, before scaling it back to 65 feet. Here is how Admiral Allen defends it. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ALLEN: Well, it’s not unusual at all for the Coast Guard to establish either safety or security zones around any number of facilities or activities for public safety or for the safety of the equipment itself. We would do this for marine events, fireworks demonstrations, cruise ships going in and out of port. (END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: So, this is the exact same logic that federal wildlife officials used to prevent CNN on two occasions from getting pictures of oiled birds that have been collected, pictures like — like the — well, that we’re about to show you which are obviously deeply disturbing, pictures of oiled gulls that we just happened to catch. Suddenly, we were told after — after that day we couldn’t catch it anymore. So, keeping prying eyes out of marshes, away from booms, off the beaches is now government policy. When asked why now, after all this time, Thad Allen said he had gotten some complaints from local officials worried people might get hurt. Now, we don’t know who these officials are. We would like to. But transparency is apparently not a high priority with Thad Allen either these days. Maybe he is accurate and some officials are concerned. And that’s their right. But we’ve heard far more from local officials about not being able to get a straight story from the government or BP. I have met countless local officials desperate for pictures to be taken and stories written about what is happening in their communities. We’re not the enemy here. Those of us down here trying to accurately show what’s happening, we are not the enemy. I have not heard about any journalist who has disrupted relief efforts. No journalist wants to be seen as having slowed down the cleanup or made things worse. If a Coast Guard official asked me to move, I would move. But to create a blanket rule that everyone has to stay 65 feet away boom and boats, that doesn’t sound like transparency. Frankly, it’s a lot like in Katrina when they tried to make it impossible to see recovery efforts of people who died in their homes. If we can’t show what is happening, warts and all, no one will see what’s happening. And that makes it very easy to hide failure and hide incompetence and makes it very hard to highlight the hard work of cleanup crews and the Coast Guard. We are not the enemy here. We found out today two public broadcasting journalists reporting on health issues say they have been blocked again and again from visiting a federal mobile medical unit in Venice, a trailer where cleanup workers are being treated. It’s known locally as the BP compound. And these two reporters say everyone they have talked to, from BP to the Coast Guard, to Health and Human Services in Washington has been giving them the runaround. We’re not talking about a CIA station here. We’re talking about a medical trailer that falls under the authority of, guess who, Thad Allen, the same Thad Allen who promised transparency all those weeks ago. We are not the enemy here.

View post:
Most Transparent Administration Ever Makes Effective Reporting from Gulf a Felony

On PBS, Oliver Stone Loved Hugo Chavez Calling Dubya the ‘Devil’: ‘It’s True’

Here’s another slightly dated example of leftist America-bashing on the taxpayer-funded airwaves over the patriotic holiday weekend. PBS talk-show host Tavis Smiley interviewed leftist director Oliver Stone on July 2 about his Hugo Chavez-smooching documentary South of the Border. Stone denounced Hillary Clinton as “an agent of the old empire game,” and when Smiley nudged Stone about Chavez’s remarks, Stone insisted he loved it when Chavez called Bush the Devil: “I think that’s a great comment. I think it’s true….He is the devil. He was.” Smiley didn’t simply celebrate Stone (as he did, with say, Van Jones, boldly professing he would take a bullet for Jones ), but he was gentle in bringing up some hard questions. He suggested he didn’t really want to dwell on the Bush-as-Satan stuff: SMILEY: If I’d wanted to, I could have done this. I didn’t want to waste our time doing it, but because the stuff is so easily found all over the internet – you know where I’m going with this. You know, on the regular, there are statements made by Chavez that cause people in this country to shudder, all kinds of things, about everything that Chavez – as you know, he’s not shy about speaking his mind. So he has made all kinds of comments about all kinds of things. None of those statements give you reason to believe that he’s gone a bit off the range? STONE: No, no. Listen, I was with him not too long ago. I was with him in 2007 and 2009. I mean, he’s under attack, but he’s a free man and I think sometimes he speaks without perhaps – he’s a big bear of a man. He’s gruff, you know, and he sometimes speaks off the cuff. He is a popular leader, but he serves the people. He’s not corrupt in any way. I find him a free soul. SMILEY: Off the cuff remarks, off the wall remarks, two different things. You think they’re off the cuff, not off the wall? STONE: Well, I don’t know which ones you’re referring to. I mean, if he’s calling Bush – “the Devil was here yesterday” – you know, I think that’s a great comment. I think it’s true. I mean, at that point, Bush was going to war in Iraq against the wishes of the majority of the United Nations. By the way, as somebody has pointed out, Chavez at the U.N. that day got the most longest applause of anybody there at the entire sessions. It’s quite something. So North America has made a big issue of everything he says, but, you know, Bush is the one who started the war. The coup d’etat of 2002, you know, was initiated by the Venezuelan oligarchy and supported and abetted by the U.S. and we make that very clear in the film. SMILEY: I’ll recall that comment about Bush as long as I live. As you may have heard – STONE: – Well, he is the devil. He was. Smiley deserves some credit for questioning around the edges about Chavez’s dictatorial tendencies, even as Stone denied it all as ridiculous. When Smiley asked whether Obama was different than Bush, he complained it was “Bush lite,” and knocked Hillary Clinton: You know, Hillary was down there a few weeks ago and there she was trying to separate Ecuador from Venezuela. She’s an agent of the old empire game. It’s a dead end for us. We keep overreaching. We want to control anybody who steps out of line, which is a regional power…. We are saying – basically, you know what it is? The pact for the New American Century, remember from the 1990s, when Bush and Rumsfeld, Cheney and Wolfowitz, wrote that pact about the American unilateral control of the world. We will brook the appearance. We will not allow for the emergence or any military or economic rival. I went into that in the W film I did on Bush. This is our policy and, whatever Obama says, this is what he’s pursuing in Afghanistan. There’s been no real change in that policy. We have our empire; we are number one. We are the world’s policemen and we will not brook an interference in that. The tone is lighter; the words are lighter, but it’s a soft power. It’s not strictly anti-American to knock President Bush or Hillary Clinton, but Stone had a more generic critique of “our empire,” and overall American arrogance in global affairs: STONE: The U.S. has knocked off so many reformers over the last hundred years, but they’ve all emerged independently. Except for Castro, they all went down, every single one from Guatemala, Panama, Brazil, Chile, constantly. This is the first time we have not been able to do anything. Hopefully, this is going to stay stable, but right now we’re fighting actively to get rid of them. SMILEY: You’re not naive, obviously. You like shaking things up, don’t you? STONE: No, I like – SMILEY: Yeah, you do. Come on. STONE: If I were, I’d be more political. I’d be more overt. SMILEY: This isn’t political and overt? STONE: Well, I like making movies. I love feature movies, as you know, but documentaries are fresh and they keep me humble and they keep me in the field. If I can contribute a little light to the worldwide cause and alert people in our country as to what our empire is really doing , I think I’d be doing some good in my life.

More here:
On PBS, Oliver Stone Loved Hugo Chavez Calling Dubya the ‘Devil’: ‘It’s True’

Katy Perry Denies Calling Miley Cyrus ‘Britney Spears All Over Again’

‘Rumor control: I never said sh– bout my girl Miley. I love that ho,’ Perry tweeted. By James Dinh Katy Perry Photo: MTV News Some parents and fans may have issues with Miley Cyrus’ recent image transformation but there’s one person who has no problem with it: Katy Perry. Last week, Life & Style magazine claimed that one of its “spies” at Canada’s MuchMusic Awards heard Katie Perry saying about Cyrus, “she’s Britney Spears all over again. It’s happening right before our eyes.” “No, she’s definitely headed the Britney route,” the source claimed Perry added. “It’s worse. Look at those outfits. It’s bad.” Perry took to Twitter late Friday to clear the air regarding the rumor, insisting that there’s no need for female rivalry in the pop stratosphere. “Rumor control: I never said sh– bout my girl Miley. I love that ho. Mags should stop pitting girls against each other. We all can co-exist!” she tweeted. Whether it’s debunking rumors or getting something off her chest, Perry has long used her Twitter to her advantage. In early June, outlets were quick to jump on a comment Perry made which seemed to be a direct stab at Lady Gaga’s video for “Alejandro.” “Using blasphemy as entertainment is as cheap as a comedian telling a fart joke,” Perry tweeted. Perry later explained that the tweet wasn’t solely directed at Gaga. “Lately, I’ve just been seeing some things that are kind of like, I don’t know, in my own personal feelings, a little bit like not something I would do, I guess.” she told a French radio station.

Original post:
Katy Perry Denies Calling Miley Cyrus ‘Britney Spears All Over Again’

Diggy Simmons Doesn’t Owe ‘Hottest Breakthrough MCs Of 2010’ Nod To Dad

Vote now to decide the Hottest Breakthrough of the year! By Shaheem Reid Diggy Photo: Atlantic “Hottest Breakthrough MC of 2010” Candidate: Diggy Simmons Diggy Simmons has been around hip-hop his whole life, but the past several months have been the most pivotal for the 15-year-old. His nomination for Hottest Breakthrough MC of 2010 was pretty much one of the easiest decisions to come to. Diggy’s checklist pretty much speaks for itself. Heavy Internet following: check. Acclaimed mixtape ( First Flight ): check. Star quality — a fashion sense that mixes young-boy fresh and grown-man sophistication, charismatic and energetic performances, humble heartthrob demeanor off the mic — check. He also has something no one else in his 2010 Breakthrough peer group does, the legendary lineage. Still, ( Diggy doesn’t have to rely on the fact that his father, Reverend Run, is one third of the greatest hip-hop group of all-time, or his uncle is one of the genre’s most heralded executives (Russell Simmons). The teenager is ready to put in work to solidify his spot. “For real though, I wanna thank MTV for even keeping me in mind for such a title,” he said on his blog, Life of a Jet Setter about his nomination. “Though I’ve only been on the rap scene for seven months now, I work very hard on my music day in and day out. If it’s not recording, I’m just vibing and strategizing on what’s next, and how I can improve. If it’s not that, it’s the other way around. So what I’mma need all my Jet Setters to do is go and vote for me as MTV’s Hottest Breakthrough MC of 2010!” Simmons also had a special message about his new mixtape opus, First Flight ‘s sequel, Airborne. “This mixtape is for dreamers, lovers, and believers,” he posted on his Twitter page. “I love the way this project has came out as a whole :)” The tape is near completion. “I vibe out to the beat, listen to it,” Diggy explained to MTV News of his writing process. “A lot of people write in their head. But I’m a little more … I don’t wanna say conscious … I wanna make sure I have everything there, so I usually do it over. I text edit on my Mac, write it up. It doesn’t take me too, too long to write a verse. I usually do the chorus before my verses for the fact I have an idea of what I want the whole track to be about. So, you know, I usually do it piece by piece.” Simmons says he finds his muse in the music of some of today’s top-flight MCs. “A lot of my inspirations in music vary from Lupe [Fiasco], to A Tribe Called Quest, to Mos Def,” he explained. “Real lyrical dudes in the game. A lot of the times when you listen to music, you have to focus on what you listen to. You can pick up the wrong inspiration for your music. [I’m] definitely a Jay fan, Nas fan. I’m a Wu-Tang fan. I may [rap] over some Wu-Tang [beats] possibly. Lupe is one of my favorites. That’s just to name a few.” Diggy and 19 other up-and-coming MCs are in the running to become MTV News’ “Hottest Breakthrough MCs of 2010” — and the winner will be decided by you! Cast your vote for the “Hottest Breakthrough MC of 2010” right here . The top five will be revealed beginning on July 19, and the winner will be announced on the “Sucker Free Summit” July 25. Related Videos Hottest Breakthrough MCs of 2010 Related Artists Diggy

Read more:
Diggy Simmons Doesn’t Owe ‘Hottest Breakthrough MCs Of 2010’ Nod To Dad

Ex Russian Spy From Peru to get $2000 a Month for Life

Spy for Russia, get caught, and get paid $2000 a month for life. Some would say that this is not justice served in the face of laughing in the face of National Security. In a rapidly arranged spy swap, the U.S. government agreed Thursday to send Russia 10 agents who had burrowed into American society — two of them in Seattle — and in return won the release of four jailed Russians accused of passing information to the West. The 10 agents, who pleaded guilty Thursday to acting as unregistered foreign agents, were deported hours later. They had endured only a few days in jail since their arrests in the United States last month. In previous cases, spies spent years behind bars before being exchanged. U.S. officials said there was no point in holding the Russian agents, since authorities had monitored their activities for years and had unraveled their network. Obama administration officials said they had been eager to win the release of the four Russians, some of whom had spent long stretches in prison and were in poor health. The deal was expected to remove an irritant from the U.S.-Russian relationship, which has improved markedly under the Obama administration. But one senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, acknowledged that “vestiges of an old Russia” were evident in the case. “Frankly, that's why we were as aggressive in rolling up this operation as we were,” the official said. Peruvian-born Vicky Pelaez, the only non-Russian among the agents, began crying after she saw a loved one among the onlookers. Anna Chapman, the Russian diplomat's daughter whose photos have become an Internet sensation, played with her red hair. Most of the others were stony-faced. Pelaez's attorney, John Rodriguez, said a private plane had been expected to take the 10 to Russia. He said his client had been given only 24 hours to say yes or no to the “all or nothing” deal for deportation. He said in court that the Russian government had promised Pelaez $2,000 a month for life, housing and documents to allow her children to visit Russia and have all their expenses paid. She decided to go home to her native Peru instead. Peru's foreign minister, Jose Antonio Garcia, said Pelaez had committed no crime in her homeland and would be “received like any other Peruvian citizen.” http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Gl2yhEUbdg8/Sm-clhCBaWI/AAAAAAAAGlo/SWO2V_FeOkY/s400/d… added by: jubal

M.I.A.’s New Album Is ‘A Turd,’ Diplo Tweets

But websites who take that comment seriously are ‘trippin’,’ producer says. By James Montgomery M.I.A. Photo: Chris Weeks/ WireImage When MTV News spoke to Diplo way back in March, he told us that M.I.A. ‘s new album was going to be “heavy” and “weird.” Turns out, he also thinks it’s also “a turd.” That’s according to Dip himself, who was asked by a fan via Twitter on Wednesday about why, at the end of the track “Tell Me Why” “does it sound like a toilet just flushed …?” “Cuz the rest of [the] album is a turd,” he tweeted back. Of course, his response quickly made the rounds on the Internet, ending up on seemingly disparate sites like Oh No They Didn’t and Pitchfork . Diplo then spent the rest of the day tweeting that the sites in question were “trippin’.” “I think when there are no Wavves vs. Crystal Castles 12″s or open [letters] from Conor Oberst and Gucci Mane, @pitchforkmedia has 2 reach a lil 4 news.” But whether or not he was just kidding around when he called M.I.A.’s ///Y/&#92 a “turd,” Diplo has had a rather interesting relationship with the album. Last month, he tweeted that his own “3 trax are slammin'” but that the rest of the record — which was produced mainly by Rusko, Blaqstarr and Switch — “sounds like Skinny Puppy and gives me nightmares.” He also added a pair of sad-face emoticons to further illustrate his point. And back in May, in the now-infamous New York Times Magazine feature on M.I.A. , he told reporter Lynn Hirschberg that “for me, making this record wasn’t easy. In the past, we were a team. But Maya wanted to show us how much she didn’t need us. In the end, Maya is postmodern; she can’t really make music or art that well, but she’s better than anyone at putting crazy ideas into motion. She knows how to manipulate, how to withhold, how to get what she wants.” An e-mail to a rep for Diplo was not responded to by press time. What do you think of M.I.A.’s album? Share your reviews in the comments. Related Artists M.I.A. Diplo

Originally posted here:
M.I.A.’s New Album Is ‘A Turd,’ Diplo Tweets

Lindsay Lohan’s Parents React To Her Sentencing

‘Any kind of jail is harsh, especially for a young lady like Lindsay,’ Michael Lohan says on ‘Larry King.’ By Jocelyn Vena Lindsay Lohan in court on Tuesday Photo: MTV News Hours after Lindsay Lohan was sentenced to 90 days in jail to be followed by 90 days in rehab for violating probation, her estranged father, Michael Lohan, sat down with Larry King to discuss his daughter’s punishment. In the interview, Lohan noted that he was feeling “dismay, but at the same time a little satisfaction that she’s going to rehab. But the last thing in the world I wanted was for my daughter to go to jail. … Any kind of jail is harsh especially for a young lady like Lindsay that doesn’t need jail. I’ve been there myself and I know that jail didn’t do anything for me with my addictions. She needs help.” Michael said he believes that his daughter is addicted to prescription medications and that in lieu of the jail time he would prefer it if Lindsay spent “six months or longer in an inpatient treatment facility.” At the end of the day, even with the sentence, Lohan thinks that his daughter can eventually recover from her demons. “I know she can do it. I don’t think she can, I know she can,” he said on the show. “She’s an intelligent girl. She’s got drive; when she puts her mind to something she can do anything in the world.” Meanwhile, Lohan’s mom, Dina, spoke about her daughter’s sentencing to Popeater.com . “This is so not fair to do this to my child,” she told the site. Related Photos Lindsay Lohan Goes To Court The Highs And Lows Of Lindsay Lohan Related Artists Lindsay Lohan

Excerpt from:
Lindsay Lohan’s Parents React To Her Sentencing

Justin Bieber Is Not Going To North Korea, Rep Confirms

Bieber-related Internet hoaxes and attacks abound in recent weeks. By James Montgomery Justin Bieber Photo: George Pimentel/ WireImage At this point, Justin Bieber ‘s camp is sort of used to the Internet hoaxes — he’s had syphilis, gotten pregnant and even died a few times, if you can believe what you read — but over the past week, there’s been one hoax that just won’t go away: His (supposed) concert stop in North Korea. It all started with a supposed contest organized by a site called Faxo.com that allowed fans to vote on which country he should visit on an upcoming leg of his My World Tour, with absolutely no restrictions. That proved advantageous for the jokesters over at the notorious 4chan message board, who encouraged folks to vote for North Korea — the communist nation where citizens are denied Internet access and the media is strictly controlled by the government. Within days, North Korea climbed the charts, and by Wednesday, when the contest ended, it had leapfrogged Israel to claim the top spot. Of course, the Internet went insane once again, and some media outlets even reported that the contest was real. But while the idea of Bieber performing for Kim Jong-il is certainly hilarious, it’s not actually true. Sure, North Korea may have won the Faxo contest, but the contest was in no way sanctioned by Bieber or anyone in his camp, according to a statement e-mailed on Wednesday (July 7) to MTV News. “It was a spoof site,” a spokesperson for Bieber wrote. “This is not a legitimate contest.” So, sadly, the Justin Bieber North Korea concert will not come to fruition anytime soon, something the Internet attributed to something other than the contest’s illegitimacy. Early Wednesday morning, more pranksters had made the most-searched term on Google Trends “Justin Bieber Hates Korea.” Meanwhile, Bieber fans were subjected to yet another Internet attack. According to the BBC , hackers wrote code into the comments sections of Bieber videos on YouTube, flashing unsuspecting fans with news of the singer’s death and/or redirecting them to adult websites. Google issued a statement saying the company “took swift action to fix a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability” on the video site. None of this seems to have slowed Bieber’s own Internet activity, however, as the avid Twitterer continues to rally his followers around his latest singles and even deigns to respond to a rumor or two. Back in June, for instance, he wrote, “One … I’m not dead. I had to check on this one … but it turns out I’m alive.” Related Videos Frame By Frame: Sean Kingston & Justin Bieber’s ‘Eenie Meenie’ MTV News Extended Play: Justin Bieber Related Photos Justin Bieber And His Many Lady Friends Related Artists Justin Bieber

Go here to see the original:
Justin Bieber Is Not Going To North Korea, Rep Confirms

Lindsay Lohan’s Profane Nail Art Sends Mixed Message In Court

Photos show the actress had the words ‘F— U’ written on the nail of her middle finger. By Gil Kaufman Lindsay Lohan at her court hearing on July 6 Photo: David McNew/ Getty Images As Lindsay Lohan tearfully, humbly pleaded with Judge Marsha Revel in a Beverly Hills, California, courtroom on Tuesday, the actress was subtly sending a somewhat different message with her nail. Lohan, 24, who was sentenced to 90 days in jail to be followed by 90 days in rehab for violating her probation from a 2007 DUI case by missing weekly alcohol-education classes . Close-ups of photos taken by The Associated Press revealed that Lohan had the message “F— U” written on the airbrushed nail of the middle finger on her left hand, which she frequently pressed to her lips and cheek during Tuesday’s hearing. At press time, it was unclear if Lohan entered the courtroom with the profane nail art or if she scribbled it on during the course of the nearly day-long hearing. It was also unclear for whom the message was intended. Lohan’s lawyer could not be reached for comment. “As far as I knew, I was in compliance with my programs. … I wasn’t trying to get special treatment,” said Lohan, whose crying jag instantly became a ubiquitous image on the Internet within minutes of the sentencing. “I have to provide for myself. I have to work. Having said that, I did everything to balance my jobs and showing up. … I’m not taking this as a joke; it’s my life and career. … I take responsibility for my actions. I’ve tried to do the best I can. It’s been such a long haul. I don’t want you to think I don’t respect you and your terms.” A legal analyst for the “Today” show, Dan Abrams, said on Wednesday morning that the sentence handed down was a “very stiff” one that was most likely meant to send a message to Lohan, as well as to the rest of the community looking on. “If she’d been anyone else, she’d be serving less time than anyone else in this case,” Abrams said. Lohan is scheduled to surrender on July 20 to begin serving her jail term and is likely to only serve a quarter of her sentence due to jail overcrowding, meaning she could be out after serving less than 25 days. Related Photos Lindsay Lohan Goes To Court The Highs And Lows Of Lindsay Lohan Related Artists Lindsay Lohan

Continue reading here:
Lindsay Lohan’s Profane Nail Art Sends Mixed Message In Court