I would assume that when a girl who looks like this turns 18, she takes advantage of the legal doors that have opened, and either films her first porn, or flashes the world her cunt….but I guess that’s just me judging a book by the cover…or calling a whore a whore…when the real whores are Zumba instructors….cuz according to google…she’s actually a talented UK pop singer who finished third on X-Factor, a show everyone knows is authentic in finding talent…. and despite being fabricated…made it on her own…at least this far…to a place a handful of people know who she is…is respectable…especially when doing the classic panty flash to get noticed…even if I’d rather this panty flash had more labia…. Here’s one of Adele’s song…to celebrate Adele not giving birth to a Chocolate cake, extra large pizza, cheeseburger and gallon of soda…..but instead giving birth to a demon child she hid from the world…cuz she could…thanks to her waistline… TO SEE THE REST OF THE PICS OF AMELIA FOLLOW THIS LINK I think I am in love…with an angel…songbird…sent from above…and by above I mean the nearest hair salon where she got her bleach job done…. Amelia…it’s just you and me girl….everyone else just doesn’t matter.
Bubba the Love Sponge has fired back at Hulk Hogan. The DJ took to his radio show this morning and responded to his ex-best friend, who has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Bubba (real name: Todd Clem) and Heather Clem , the former couple (pictured) Hogan believes is behind the release of his sex tape. Without explicitly denying his involvement in the video, Bubba said he hasn’t seen it and hinted on air that Hogan may “have had something to do with the leak of it.” He also spoke VERY unfavorably about the iconic wrestler. “He’s a one-way piece of crap who doesn’t care about anyone but himself,” said Bubba, adding that Hogan is “the ultimate lying showman.” Acknowledging that he gave Hulk permission to sleep with his ex-wife in 2006, Bubba said Hogan wasn’t exactly coerced into sex with Heather Clem. “Nobody put a gun to your head,” he said. “You can’t play the victim like that.” Hogan alleges that his privacy was invaded and his legal team has demanded all copies of the sex tape be destroyed. We agree. Who the heck wants to watch this 59-year old have intercourse?!?
Bobbi Kristina Brown may soon be a very rich young woman. But not if her family has anything to say about it. Following the death of her mother, Whitney Houston, this teenager stands to inherit around $20 million. Time to party it up with boyfriend Nick Gordon , right? Not so fast. According to TMZ, Cissy Houston and Pat Houston – Whitney’s mother and sister-in-law – have filed a request to modify the late singer’s will because they don’t believe Bobbi should receive the entire estate at once. Sources quote the relatives as believing such an influx of money would be “too much, too soon” for Bobbi, who has battle substance abuse problems over the years. The family wants to “protect [Bobbi Kristina] from herself,” says an insider, as the legal documents assert this 19-year old “is a highly visible target for those who would exert undue influence over her inheritance.” As Whitney Houston’s sole heir, Bobbi will take in 10% of her mother’s fortune when she turns 21; around 10% more when she turns 25; and the rest at 30. It’s unclear at the moment how Cissy and Pat’s plan would alter this arrangement.
Man Says He’s Too “Racist And Homophobic” To Be A Juror Wow. People will try anything to get out of jury duty!! A WOULD-BE juror faces prosecution after he claimed he was unable to serve at Southampton Crown Court due to “extreme homophobic and racist views”. A letter written by the man was read out in court after he was selected to serve on the jury in the case of a man who was on trial for assault and dangerous driving. Presiding Judge Gary Burrell QC read the letter out in open court in which the man, who the Daily Echo cannot name for legal reasons, said his extreme views made it impossible for him to be impartial. He wrote: “I strongly believe that it would be a serious injustice to the legal system to select me for jury service. “I hold extreme prejudices against homosexuals and black/foreign people and couldn’t possibly be impartial if either appeared in court. Therefore it would not be in the court’s interest to have me a juror.” He added that in his eagerness to bring any case to a swift conclusion, he would simply vote with the majority and not give his true opinion. He concluded: “I would be more than happy to speak to a judge regarding my personal views regarding the legal system which I do not hold in high regard.” Prosecuting and defence barristers Rebecca Austin and Robert Bryan lodged a challenge to him as a juror. When questioned by Judge Burrell about whether these were his true beliefs he confirmed they were and added that he didn’t think he had the right to “judge anyone”. Judge Burrell said: “If you do genuinely hold these views then you are someone who should not be on the jury and I question whether you should be doing anything responsible in society at all.” The man, who was escorted from the court, was warned he now faced prosecution under the Contempt of Court act for failing to serve on a jury as Judge Burrell would be writing to the Attorney General about the case. SMH. What’s the craziest thing you’ve ever done to get out of jury duty?? Source
A judge may have ruled, but the legal battle between Usher and Tameka Foster appears to have no end in sight. Late last month, the singer won primary custody of the two children he shares with Foster, only for his ex-wife to appeal the decision on the grounds that the judge was biased because Usher raised funds for his campaign in 2008. And now Usher has filed a motion in response to that appeal. In documents submitted last Wednesday, the artist urges the court to deny Foster’s request because it is “an assault on the integrity of the court.” He argues that the granting of a new custody trial would create a slippery slope in which all decisions could be a reversed if an attorney contributed to a judge’s campaign. Usher alleges that Foster’s legal maneuvering “constitutes a continuum of [Tameka’s] vile and unsupported claims that every person who dared testify against her … is biased and tainted.” No word from the judge regarding either filing yet, but we have a feeling we have not heard the last from either of these parties. Not by a long shot. [Photo: WENN.com]
Didn’t expect to hear that… Paul Ryan Supports State Decision For Legal Medicinal Drugs In an interview with Colorado station KRDO-TV, Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan says he believes it’s up to the states to decide whether to legalize medical mary jane. “My personal position on these issues has been let the states decide what they want to do with these things,” he explains. “This is something that is not a high priority of ours.” Pun intended? Voters in Colorado will decide whether to legalize medical mary jane this November with Amendment 64 on the ballot. According to KRDO-TV, Ryan made clear that he “doesn’t believe” in the effort, but he nevertheless feels the issue should be reconciled at the state level. Here is what “Money Makin” Mitt says about the sticky-icky: Campaigning in New Hampshire during the GOP primary, Mitt Romney was asked on several occasions whether he supported medical mary jane. He became visibly frustrated. “I have the same position this week I had last week when you asked the question,” he said, before arguing fairly loosely that medical mary jane should be banned because it might lead to broader mary jane legalization, which might in turn lead pot smokers to try hard drugs. “The entryway into our drug culture for our young people is mary jane,” Romney said. “mary jane is the starter drug. And the idea of medical mary jane is designed to help get mary jane out into the public marketplace and ultimately lead to the legalization of mary jane overall. And in my view, that’s the wrong way to go.” Those folks on the Republican side of things might not like this too much. Image via Shutterstock Source
As previously reported, Robert Pattinson wants to sell the home he shared with Kristen Stewart. Because it reminds him too much about his adulterous ex? Partly. But also because Robert is “thinking long and hard about returning to London ,” an insider tells Radar. Pattinson “never fell in love with Los Angeles,” the source adds, and was actually reminded of how much he loves England when he visited Stewart there during her filming of Snow White and the Huntsman . Ironic, we know. “Despite making friends in America, Robert longs just to have a pint with the mates he grew up with in a local west London pub. He’s just a regular guy,” reports Radar. “He misses [his family] very much and they’ve said they’d welcome him back with open arms.” Well… d’uh! Why wouldn’t they? While he determines where to go next, at least Pattinson might have another romantic option to consider. Sources say Rihanna has been texting the star!
We just learned that LeAnn Rimes is in treatment for anxiety and stress a few hours ago, but apparently it was a long time coming for the country star. She was, and is, embroiled in a battle that is draining her emotionally. No, not against Brandi Glanville . LeAnn Rimes feels she has become a victim of severe bullying online and is trying to turn the tables on her detractors. The 30-year-old has accumulated a ton of offensive Tweets written about her, among a circle of private individuals and is exploring her legal options. “There has been this cyber-bullying that has been going on for a considerable period of time,” her lawyer Larry Stein told Celebuzz in an interview. “Apparently, most of this started when LeAnn started dating Eddie Cibrian,” he said. “These women have been merciless … vitriolic in their attacks.” “They don’t understand who she is or who she stands for.”
What are they doing to the meat?: The U.S. Department of Agriculture is investigating “disturbing evidence of inhumane treatment of cattle” at a California meat supplier, the agency said. After receiving video from an animal welfare group, the USDA sent investigators to the Central Valley Meat Co. and found violations of humane handling, the agency said in a statement. “We have reviewed the video and determined that while some of the footage provided shows unacceptable treatment of cattle, it does not show anything that would compromise food safety,” said Al Almanza, administrator of the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service. The USDA suspended inspections at the Hanford-based company, effectively halting slaughter operations there. Company officials have not seen the video, said Brian Coelho, president of the Central Valley Meat Co. He said he was “extremely disturbed” to learn that inspections were suspended. “Our company seeks to not just meet federal humane handling regulations, but to exceed them,” Coelho said in a statement. He said federal inspectors continuously inspect the plant and are able to take action if they see a problem. “That is why these allegations are both disturbing and surprising,” he said. Central Valley did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday after CNN sent the company a link to the video. Compassion Over Killing, a nonprofit organization that focuses on animal cruelty, posted the video to YouTube and to its website on Tuesday. The group said an undercover investigator shot the video. In the graphic video, one worker stands on the nostrils of a cow that the narrator says has been shot in the head but didn’t die right away. In another segment, a worker appears to shoot a cow in the head several times. “At U.S. slaughterhouses, federal law requires death to be quick, when cows are shot in the head the process should cause immediate unconsciousness,” the narrator says. “At Central Valley, countless deaths we documented were slow and agonizing.” Central Valley Meat, a 50-year-old company, was one of the beef suppliers for In-N-Out Burger, a well-known fast food chain predominantly in California and the Southwest. Mark Taylor, chief operating officer for In-N-Out, said the chain has stopped doing business with Central Valley Meat. “In-N-Out Burger would never condone the inhumane treatment of animals, and all of our suppliers must agree to abide by our strict standards for the humane treatment of cattle,” he said in a statement. The plant has been closed while the USDA conducts its investigation. Central Valley said it will cooperate with the probe. CNN
Seems Todd Akin’s comment had a huge impact on women brave enough to come out and tell their stories. Women everywhere, one after the other, have been taking their tragedies to the media in a heroic effort. Shauna R. Prewitt wrote about her experience and how, years later, she’s raising her daughter who was the product of a viscous act so many of us struggle to tell. While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment — the horrifying moment that I became a “victim” — from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim….People who did not even know me were quick to comment or speculate on my rape. What were you wearing? Did you scream loudly? Did this occur in public? Eight years after my rape, I find myself on trial against ignorance again. Rep. Todd Akin’s recent comments that “legitimate rape” rarely results in pregnancy not only flout scientific fact but, for me, cut deeper. Akin has de-legitimized my rape. You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again. It would not be long before I would learn firsthand that in the vast majority of states — 31 — men who father through rape are able to assert the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy . When no law prohibits a rapist from exercising these rights, a woman may feel forced to bargain away her legal rights to a criminal trial in exchange for the rapist dropping the bid to have access to her child. For the sake of her child, the woman will sacrifice her need to see her once immensely powerful perpetrator humbled by the court. I know it because I lived it. I went to law school to learn how to stop it. Having fought this injustice for the past several years, I have come to believe that ignorance is to blame for this legal absence. Opponents argue no woman would ever choose to raise the child she conceived through rape. The only two studies to analyze the choices made by pregnant raped women indicate otherwise — at least 30% of women who conceive by rape make this choice. Others argue that no rapist would ever seek parental rights. Not only does my experience and that of others I know prove otherwise, but it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child. Today, it seems we may face a new and unbelievable challenge: convincing legislators that women can conceive when they are raped. Our heart goes out to every Woman out there who’s ever felt that indescribable fear and struggles because she was violated. Make sure you Vote this year so we can keep Congress and Fat Cat Politicos out of our Crocthes! Source Images via Shutterstock
