Tag Archives: Love

Angelina Jolie — Doing Good Never Looked So Good

Filed under: Angelina Jolie , Paparazzi Photo , Hot Mamas , Fashion Using her super powers to better the world, UNHCR Goodwill Ambassador Angelina Jolie visited with flood victims in Pakistan on Tuesday. Somehow Angie even manages to make charity work look like a magazine cover shoot. Read more

More:
Angelina Jolie — Doing Good Never Looked So Good

MJ’s Alleged Love Child Shot Down in Court

Filed under: Michael Jackson , Diana Ross , Celebrity Justice The latest woman claiming to be Michael Jackson ‘s illegitimate child will never be able to prove it … because a judge has shut her down. As we first reported , Mocienne Petit Jackson filed documents back in July — claiming she’s the love child… Read more

Read more:
MJ’s Alleged Love Child Shot Down in Court

Where Have You Gone, Roger Ebert?

It breaks my heart to write this article.  Roger Ebert has been a part of my love for cinema since I was eleven years old.  When I was in the hospital for two months at age 19, I devoured his entire book of movie reviews.  I even met him at the 2002 Conference on World Affairs when he dissected David Lynch’s masterpiece  Mulholland Drive  (though I thought he needlessly threw in the towel regarding the film’s meaning).   I don’t need to expound on his contributions to film education and his championing of truly great movies. Nevertheless, I don’t know the man. I only know his words. Yet I have to wonder if the physical and mental trauma Roger has endured has taken a toll on his mind.  He always seemed apolitical to me.  He just wrote great movie reviews.  However, he started a political journal on his website in the past year.  It’s full of the same clap-trap expected from those on the Left: false premises, poorly constructed arguments, and replies to comments which dodge legitimate challenges. What really concerns me, though, is that it actually makes less sense than the normal clap-trap.  It’s nonsense.   Suddenly, all the great analysis directed at thousands of films – obviously pouring forth from a great intellect – has vanished.  Is it because Mr. Ebert shuts his mind off when discussing politics?  Is it because the anger he must have concerning his condition is being projected onto the Right? After all, the journal started after all the physical damage had been done to his appearance. Or has Roger Ebert actually lost his mind? His bizarre screed  from September 1 stems entirely from, “a Harris poll in which 57 percent of [GOP] party members believe he is a Muslim, 22% believe he “wants the terrorists to win,” and 24% believe he is the Antichrist”. There’s just one wee problem.  Mr. Ebert’s outrage relies on results from a polling entity that is as ridiculously unscientific as is possible.   Harris polls are not random surveys across broad demographics .  Harris polls incentivize participation by awarding cash and gifts.    The particular poll cited by Mr. Ebert  was rightly taken apart by ABC news polling director Gary Langer , who called the poll’s problems “fundamental…and carry a heavy dose of…acquiescence bias”. I also found it distressing that Mr. Ebert railed against the financing of a great Right Wing Conspiracy, yet failed to note that Harris Interactive is itself a public company, in severe distress likely because of its own flawed data mining methods.  They make it very clear in their annual report just how unscientific their polling is (Page 12 of the 10-K filing from August 31): “Our success is highly dependent on our ability to maintain sufficient capacity of our online panel… response rates vary with differing survey content, and the frequency with which panelists are willing to respond to survey invitations is variable…We are not always able to accommodate client requests to survey low-incidence, limited populations with specific demographic characteristics…our business will be adversely affected if we do not achieve sufficient response rates with our existing panelists or our panel narrows and we are unable to spend the funds necessary to recruit additional panelists”. Now, armed with this knowledge, doesn’t Mr. Ebert’s next paragraph reach uncomofortable heights of irony? “These figures sadden me with the depth of thoughtlessness and credulity they imply. A democracy depends on an informed electorate to survive. An alarming number of Americans and a majority of Republicans are misinformed”. And I think we know why! Okay, so thus far it can be chalked up to the usual debate style of the Left.  But here’s what concerns me about his state of mind: In responding to one of his commenters, who also questioned his reliance on Harris’ data, he said: “The entry isn’t about the accuracy of polls. It’s about a belief widely shared by too many Americans.  Unless you’re telling me Harris finds that Americans don’t believe Obama is a Muslim, what difference does its precise accuracy make? That’s off-topic.” This strikes me as weird because  his entire article  is based on polling data!  He says it right up front! “We already know the numbers. Pew finds that 18% of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim. A new Newsweek poll, taken after the controversy over the New York mosque, places that figure at 24%” Nor did Mr. Ebert actually examine the  breakdown  of the Pew Poll.  In it, 10% of Democrats believe Obama is a Muslim.  Somehow 10% is not an alarming number, but 31% is.  I’d think, given the severity of the religious issue Mr. Ebert has raised, that even 1% would be alarming.  But 10% isn’t.   Interestingly, he also fails to mention that  43% said they don’t even know  what  President Obama’s religion is. Alas, there’s plenty more unintended irony to be found. “This many Americans did not arrive at such conclusions on their own. They were persuaded by a relentless process of insinuation, strategic silence and cynical misinformation”. Mr. Ebert seems to only reserve his scorn for  Republicans and “misinformed Americans” who apparently are “misinformed” because they listen to right wing radio talk show hosts. It’s  the typical elitist statement – how Liberals cannot fathom that people can actually think and act for themselves.  That maybe – just maybe – people take the time to research what’s actually behind things like, you know,  polling results  before making up their own minds? Mr. Ebert’s conclusion – insisting that, “prominent Republicans reiterate that they do not believe Obama is a Muslim” – is more than just ridiculous from a political perspective (I’m sure we can expect prominent Democrats who voted for the Iraq War to reiterate their support of it).   It’s also based on a flawed premise. Furthermore, Mr. Ebert does not seem to believe that Mr. Obama is capable of defending himself.   And why should it matter?  Even if the Harris poll were accurate, it’s Republicans that allegedly hold these beliefs.  Is Mr. Ebert afraid these beliefs will somehow spread to Democrats?   Since he believes people cannot think for themselves, perhaps that is the case.  After all, 10% have already been “misinformed”. I really wish Mr. Ebert would just stop writing about politics.  His errors are so fundamental.  To say, “our political immune system has only one antibody, and that is the truth” denies an actual fundamental truth itself:  politics has nothing to do with the truth.  Another of my fallen heroes, Chris Matthews, said it all in one of his terrific books:  “Politics is about survival.” The only truth I know is that Mr. Ebert’s line of thinking is just so uncharacteristic of the man I know that loves cinema and write so articulately about it.  I don’t care what his political beliefs are, ultimately.  I care about his mental faculties, and how he is undermining his own legacy as one of cinema’s great champions. I really wish he would return to the balcony.

More:
Where Have You Gone, Roger Ebert?

Eminem, Jay-Z Joined By Dr. Dre, Drake At Historic Detroit Concert

D12, 50 Cent and G-Unit, Young Jeezy also hit Comerica Park stage as Em, Hov unleash flurry of hits on first stop of Home and Home Tour. By Shaheem Reid Eminem and Jay-Z (file) Photo: Kristian Dowling/ Getty Images Detroit hasn’t screamed this loud at a baseball park since Kirk Gibson was hitting home runs in the 1984 World Series. Hip-hop history was made as Jay-Z and Eminem co-headlined the Motor City’s Comerica Park (home of the D-Town Tigers for the past decade) on Thursday night (September 2), the first of two shows on consecutive nights. While Jay’s high-grossing touring schedule helped him to top this year’s Forbes’ “Hip-Hop Cash King” list , Eminem took a much-needed sabbatical to deal with a myriad of personal issues. Now beyond his darkest hour, Em had one of his brightest moments ever onstage. Not only did he gift his hometown with a seemingly endless string of hits, he pulled off some major surprises. After D12, 50 Cent and the G-Unit — acts that fans likely expected — came out for performances with Em, Slim Shady pulled off a shocker. Dr. Dre came out, first stunning the people then delighting them with smashes. After his name appeared on the Comerica big screen, the man heralded by many as the greatest producer of his time came out to the opening notes of his world-famous “Next Episode.” Then the familiar first keys of “Still Dre” were played. “Haters say Dre fell off,” the Doc rapped. “How n—a? My last album was The Chronic. ” After that, the Shady/Aftermath duo took it back to Dre’s Chronic days with “Nuthin’ But a ‘G’ Thang.” “One, two, three and to the fo,” Em rapped in Snoop’s cadence. ” ‘Cause you know we came to rip sh– up!” Dre spit later. Dr. Dre appeared to be in the best shape of his life. Wearing a T-shirt with the late Proof’s face printed on it, Dre looked strong enough to end the Undertaker’s undefeated streak at Wrestlemania. “Got dammit, Detroit. Do I love you or what?” Eminem asked his fans. “Look what I brought out for you.” Em then told Dre he wanted him to feel the love; Detox chants followed. “Deeee-tox. Deeee-tox,” they yelled from the bleachers to the bullpen. Dre just smiled and said, “I’m Comin’!” One would-be guest who couldn’t attend for obvious reasons was Lil Wayne. But Shady made sure to salute Weezy after “No Love.” And the Young Money flag did wave proudly in Detroit as Drake came out for “Forever” and gave a special nod to the Motor City. “In Detroit, faded off the brown,” Drake rapped. “Nino!!!!” the crowd responded. “I’m so honored to be here to tonight. This is history in the making. I want y’all to make some noise for the muthaf—in’ legend that is Emimem.” Em’s legend was largely built off his mastery of music and a catalog made for the kind of environment he played on Thursday: stadiums. The Detroit rapper has been making sing-along anthems throughout his career. Not just tracks you rap in the shower or in the car, but big records like “Sing for the Moment,” “Stan” and “Cleaning Out My Closet” — tracks practically begging for an audience of tens of thousands holding lighters up. Em proved he still has that rare connection with his fanbase. Grown men took off their shirts and got rock-n-roll rowdy when he rapped. “Got dammit, Detroit, I’m back,” Em said early on in the night. “Did you miss me?” It was clear that Em missed his fans as well. He was engaging, lively and energetic on this night. After the “Real Slim Shady” and “Without Me,” Em thanked his fans again. “I love you. This song is for you.” “Not Afraid” followed. After screams of “encore, encore,” Em brought out the Unit, D12 and Detroit legend Trick Trick who had earlier performed on “Lose Yourself.” Thursday’s Home and Home show kicked off with B.o.B, who came back later for “Airplanes, Pt. 2,” and set the tone with a quick set that included “Nothin’ on You.” The audience was eventually alerted that the Jiggaman was 10 minutes away from showtime. Two clocks filled two oversize screens on the enormous stage while the Beastie Boys’ “No Sleep Till Brooklyn” blared from the speakers. When the countdown hit “0,” Jay rose from beneath the stage, the lyrically intricate “Dynasty Intro” being played by his band, the Roc Boys. Then a brief snippet of “Lucifer” played before Jay went into his jaw-dropping verse from Rick Ross’ “Free Mason.” During “D.O.A. (Death of Auto-Tune),” Jay rhymed “this might need a verse from Jeezy.” On cue, the Snowman came out for the “Dey Know” remix followed by “Soul Survivor.” His mini-set ended with “Put on for My City” and “Lose My Mind.” After that though, it was the Jay hit parade — with assistance from Memphis Bleek. The Brooklyn duo rocked with a flurry of big records, including “You Don’t Know,” “99 Problems” and “(Originator 99).” During “Big Pimpin’,” Jay delivered Pimp C’s verse in the late UGK legend’s cadence. “What y’all know about them Deetroit boys?” Hov asked. A tribute to hip-hop’s fallen soldiers ensued, as the audience shouted in unison, “Prrrrrooooooooof!” “I know y’all going through a lot, but Detroit has heart and Detroit will be back,” Jay said. Hov and Slim Shady shared but a few minutes of stage time as Jay emerged for “Renegade” during Em’s set. The Home and Home Tour continues Friday night (September 3) at Comerica Park and comes to the Bronx, New York, on September 13 and 14 at Yankee Stadium. Were you at Jay and Em’s Detroit stop? Tell us what you thought of the show! Related Photos Jay-Z And Eminem: Other Megastar Concert Pairings MCs And Their Hometown Stadiums Jay-Z And Eminem: Stadium Face-Off Related Artists Eminem Jay-Z Dr. Dre

The rest is here:
Eminem, Jay-Z Joined By Dr. Dre, Drake At Historic Detroit Concert

Usher’s VMA-Nominated ‘OMG’ Inspired By ’80s Sci-Fi Character

Director Anthony Mandler wanted to let R&B superstar take viewers “on a journey, not a ride.” By Jayson Rodriguez Usher in “OMG” For a video as forward thinking as Usher’s “OMG” — with its laser beams and light flashes — director Anthony Mandler actually looked back for inspiration. “The original idea was kind of Max Headroom,” Mandler told MTV News, citing the animated science-fiction character from ’80s British TV. “That’s where it came from — the TV flickering on and there’s this character. We just wanted to bring it up to date.” “Max Headroom was always in his room,” he continued, “this unidentifiable room, ’80s shapes. I used that for inspiration.” The formula worked: “OMG” is among the Best Male Video nominees for the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards. The clip is up against Drake’s “Find Your Love,” Jason Derulo’s “In My Head,” Eminem’s “Not Afraid” and B.o.B.’s “Airplanes.” Mandler is a multiple nominee, having also helmed Drake’s video. “OMG” is the first time Usher and Mandler — who’s worked with Jay-Z, Mary J. Blige, and Rihanna — collaborated on a project. Usher said he knew the video would be a challenge and wanted to make sure the director was up to the task. “When I first shot the song to him, I was like, ‘Are you sure you’re gonna be able to catch this one?’ And he said, ‘I got it,'” Usher explained. “We wanted to bring into my world,” he continued. “Obviously, the international sound and look and feel has already been set, but we wanted to do something theatrical, fun and energetic to show us working off of each other and playing off of each other as artists, but the cinematography would be artistic and incredible.” Mandler described the visuals as “Hitchcock-ian.” Though the style of the shot was important to the director, he had a simpler goal in mind: to capture Usher in his element. He said the key to the clip was simply letting Usher’s talent take over. “The concept was to create a world where we put Usher in a space where he does what I think he does better than anyone else in the world, which is perform at a level and magnitude of a superstar and take us, the viewer, whether audible or visually, on a journey, not a ride,” the director said. “And, in that, I wanted to create an unpredictability, so one set leads to another and another, and you never know what’s gonna happen. Along the way, Usher becomes our guide. We’re so focused on him, we don’t notice the change. The thing is unfolding little by little, and you can’t quite see far enough ahead to know what’s gonna come next.” The 27th annual MTV Video Music Awards will be broadcast live from the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles on September 12 at 9 p.m. ET. Go to VMA.MTV.com (or text VMA to 97979 if you are a Verizon subscriber) to vote for the Best New Artist video through September 12. Related Artists Usher

Original post:
Usher’s VMA-Nominated ‘OMG’ Inspired By ’80s Sci-Fi Character

Armin Van Buuren Reveals Tribute Song For Love Parade Victims

‘Remember Love,’ van Buuren’s collaboration with Paul van Dyk and Paul Oakenfold, may debut at New York’s Electric Zoo festival this weekend. By Akshay Bhansali Armin Van Buuren Photo: MTV News Last week, MTV news had a chance to catch up with trance music maestro Armin van Buuren for a Skype chat in which he shared details on his two-year-long mammoth recording project, a 21-track disc titled “Mirage,” available for download September 10. Indeed, the project marks van Buuren’s most ambitious recording endeavor thus far: He worked with veteran songwriter Guy Chambers, Owl City’s Adam Young , and New York native Nadia Ali (with whom he’s had a past hit, “Who Is Watching,” off his Shivers album), and rising stars the sisters of Nervo, who wrote David Guetta’s hit “When Love Takes Over,” featuring Kelly Rowland . And with his album due in less than 10 days, the Dutch star says fans attending New York’s Electric Zoo electronic-music festival this weekend will be treated to a healthy sampling of everything he’s been working on. “It’s gonna be a massive show,” he said. “I’m gonna be premiering a lot of tracks from my new album, obviously. It’s a week before the album gets released so I’m really looking forward to playing some of the new tracks that are on the album, and also some of the mixes.” Van Buuren also seized the opportunity to officially announce he might play a new song that’s not on his forthcoming album. “I can tell you something special,” he revealed. “I’m working on a track with Paul van Dyk and Paul Oakenfold for the victims of the Love Parade.” On July 24 at the 2010 Love Parade festival in Duisburg, Germany, a stampede erupted at the entrance to the festival grounds, resulting in the deaths of 21 concertgoers. Show organizers and city officials continue to blame each other for the catastrophe. Last month, electronic-music icon Paul Oakenfold was the first to share the news of the collaboration when he tweeted , “#trancefamily @arminvanbuuren @paulvandyk and myself have come together under the name #DJUnited to do a track called ‘Remember Love.’ ” There has been an outpouring of sympathy from the EDM artist community since the tragedy. The track recorded by van Buuren, van Dyk and Oakenfold, under the apparent “DJ United” banner, marks perhaps the biggest original song of homage to date. “We were so shocked about what happened here in Duisburg in Europe that we thought about doing a track together. The track will be called ‘Remember Love.’ I’m actually bouncing back and forth with Paul van Dyk the final version of that track,” van Buuren explained. Armin van Buuren will be sharing the stages of New York’s Electric Zoo electronic-music festival this Saturday and Sunday (September 4 and 5) with Markus Schulz, A-Trak, Diplo, Boys Noize, Rusko, Afrojack, the Chemical Brothers, John Digweed and many others.

Read the original post:
Armin Van Buuren Reveals Tribute Song For Love Parade Victims

On MSNBC, an Incensed Maddow Howls Over Obama’s Kind Words for George W. Bush

President Barack Obama’s decision to include, in his Tuesday night address from the Oval Office on the end to the “combat mission” in Iraq, a sentence respectful toward former President George W. Bush, appalled MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. Anchor Keith Olbermann recited Obama’s graciousness toward Bush (“It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset, yet no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops or his love of country and commitment to our security”) and then, obviously speaking for himself and the entire MSNBC team, proposed: “There are people who would support President Obama who would howl at hearing that said aloud more than once.” Maddow indeed howled, launching into an indignant rant: To have in this speech, as combat operations are ending, to have…the President not only not addressing the circumstances in which we went to war, but these kind words for President Bush , describing his “commitment to our security” despite the recklessness with which President Bush discarded that national security in favor of this war of choice, which only diminished our security, and is responsible, probably, for the Afghanistan war still going on today, for the deaths of people who have died in Afghanistan after the time after which that war would have ended had we not gone to Iraq — not to mention all of the people who died in Iraq. After finally taking a breath, she continued: To talk about him having a demonstrated “commitment to our security,” having started this war on the terms on which he started it, I mean, it’s beyond restraint from President Obama and anybody in the pro-Iraq war, pro-Bush camp who doesn’t feel like they’ve been given the greatest political present they never deserved, was not listening to this speech. From MSNBC’s Countdown at about 8:24 PM EDT, just after President Obama completed his August 31 speech carried by all the networks: KEITH OLBERMANN: That one sentence in there, “It’s well known,” referring to President Bush, “that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset, yet no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops or his love of country and commitment to our security.” There are people who would support President Obama who would howl at hearing that said aloud more than once. Once again, contextualize this in terms of the entire administration. RACHEL MADDOW: Yeah, I’m, I think we shouldn’t get past how remarkable it is, how much the proponents of the Iraq war are getting off easy here. I mean, we’ve got Paul Wolfowitz and John Bolten and these guys, like out now offering their suggestions on what ought to happen in Iraq next. Paul Wolfowitz, who said that the war would pay for itself, that we wouldn’t have to spend any money there. And to have in this speech, as combat operations are ending, to have – as you point out Keith – the President not only not addressing the circumstances in which we went to war, but these kind words for President Bush, describing his “commitment to our security” despite the recklessness with which President Bush discarded that national security in favor of this war of choice, which only diminished our security, and is responsible, probably, for the Afghanistan war still going on today, for the deaths of people who have died in Afghanistan after the time after which that war would have ended had we not gone to Iraq — not to mention all of the people who died in Iraq. To talk about him having a demonstrated “commitment to our security,” having started this war on the terms on which he started it, I mean, it’s beyond restraint from President Obama and anybody in the pro-Iraq war, pro-Bush camp who doesn’t feel like they’ve been given the greatest political present they never deserved, was not listening to this speech. OLBERMANN: They won’t.

The rest is here:
On MSNBC, an Incensed Maddow Howls Over Obama’s Kind Words for George W. Bush

George Stephanopoulos Zeroes-In on Meghan McCain’s Spat With Palins

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos interviewed media darling and nominal Republican Meghan McCain on Tuesday’s Good Morning America and devoted the bulk of the segment to her love-hate relationship with Sarah Palin and her daughter Bristol. Stephanopoulos devoted so much time to the Palin issue that McCain interjected, “For the record, my book is not just about Sarah and Bristol.” The anchor gushingly endorsed the McCain daughter’s new book, “Dirty Sexy Politics,” at the beginning of the interview, which aired 42 minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour: ” It is savvy, it is saucy, and it’s just what you’d expect from the first daughter of a presidential candidate ever fired by her father’s campaign .” He then labeled his guest a “fun writer” and first asked about her “firing,” in which she actually sent away from the main stops of her father’s presidential campaign and did a bus tour in the battleground state of Ohio. After four questions on her “firing,” Stephanopoulos raised the issue of Mrs. Palin with McCain. She put all of her answers in the context of herself and her experiences, while the ABC anchor pressed her on the former governor of Alaska, with two negative follow-up questions about Palin and two neutral: STEPHANOPOULOS: Since the campaign, you had said you didn’t want to talk about Sarah Palin. But you write about her quite a bit in the book. You say there were a lot of things you like about Sarah Palin, but you also point out that she snubbed your Mom’s efforts to reach out to the Palins, that she wasn’t much of a team player. You believe- you talk about doubts you had at the end where you thought she actually hurt the campaign. ” MCCAIN: Yes, but I do clearly state at the end that we did not lose because of her, and I’m speaking out now because I do have conflicting feelings about her. I mean, she brought so much momentum and enthusiasm to the campaign. I mean, you saw the crowds double, and you saw a lot more women coming to rallies- STEPHANOPOULOS: But you also write that she brought- quote, ‘drama, stress, complications, panic, and loads of uncertainty.’ MCCAIN: (laughs) It’s true. I mean, a lot of things happen, but I think that’s how campaigns are in general, no matter who comes, and- you know, I respect her, as a feminist or Republican feminist, and going out there and working for women, especially Republican women. It’s no secret that I’m more socially liberal than she is, but I’m here to say that two different kinds of Republican women can work together for the same cause. STEPHANOPOULOS: And you talked about this moment in the campaign where you’re being interviewed, and you almost got tongue-tied when you were asked about Sarah Palin. You said you had doubts about her. What are the doubts? MCCAIN: It was a reflection on me, because she was so celebrated in the Republican Party, and it’s- again, no secret that I’m so unlike her, and I thought, how am I ever going to fit in? How am I ever going to do this? And it’s still something that I struggle with today because people so see me as sort of this rebel and this new Republican, which I take pride in, but a lot of, sort of, older Republicans seem to have a problem placing me. STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you say there’s room in the party for both of you, but you want a Republican to win in 2012- you say that as well. Could she be your candidate? MCCAIN: Anyone could be my candidate at this point. I really don’t like these hypothetical questions, but I think that so many candidates are doing or- you know, people that could be running right now, are making very smart moves. I think Mitt Romney is doing a lot of smart things right now. I think it’s going to be a very interesting election, no matter what happens (unintelligible)- STEPHANOPOULOS: Would you vote for her? MCCAIN: It depends [on] the situation. You know, I’d have to hear more on what happens in the primaries. As you’re well aware, anything can happen in the primaries, and I would have to see. It was when Stephanopoulos brought up McCain’s spat with Bristol Palin over teen abstinence and teen pregnancy that the liberal Republican replied with her “my book is not just about Sarah and Bristol” line and added, “a lot of fun stories.” The anchor replied, “I want to ask you about one of those stories in a second. But first, you say that at that point, the campaign seemed to be glamorizing teen pregnancy, that the campaign really wanted to suggest that a pro-life message was more important than the message of how to avoid teen pregnancy to begin with? ” McCain answered, in part, “I have a sister who is almost exactly- my little sister Bridget is almost exactly Bristol’s age, and I just know that I want teens in this country to be aware of what can happen when you have sex. You can die from sex in this era, and not necessarily- I just think that the pro-abstinence complete campaign isn’t necessarily the most effective one.” Stephanopoulos concluded the interview by asking his guest about another of her “fun stories” involving a visit to the White House where she was apparently “dis-invited” from a lunch at the White House with Laura Bush and her daughter Jenna. The anchor repeated his endorsement of McCain’s book at the very end of the interview: “Meghan McCain, it is a terrific book, it’s a fun book, it’s a revealing book about life in politics as well .” ABC has promoted Ms. McCain’s liberal flavor of Republicanism in the past with her appearance as a guest host on The View, where she slammed conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham , and profiled her support of same-sex “marriage” on World News .

See more here:
George Stephanopoulos Zeroes-In on Meghan McCain’s Spat With Palins

Sandra Bullock Shares Love For New Orleans On ‘Today’

Actress talked about son Louis’ hometown and the school she helped rebuild. By Gil Kaufman Sandra Bullock on the “Today” show Tuesday Photo: NBC Much has been made about Oscar winner Sandra Bullock ‘s ties to the college town of Austin, Texas, where the star has retreated to avoid the paparazzi’s glare since her divorce from Jesse James . But on Tuesday (August 31), Bullock appeared on the “Today” show to discuss her love for New Orleans, where she has found another home. Bullock , in her first televised interview since her split with James, told host Matt Lauer that the Big Easy has always been a comfortable place for her, somewhere she has gone often to visit, ring in the new year and most recently, the place where she finalized her adoption of son Louis. But the reason she was there this week was to celebrate the successful rebuilding of the Warren Easton Charter High School, which suffered more than $4 million in damage five years ago this week during Hurricane Katrina . She sat next to Arthur Hardy, a New Orleans Mardi Gras expert and Easton board member, who said he laughed when Bullock called with an offer to help help, thinking someone was pulling his leg. “She found us … [and] called me on a Sunday afternoon,” he said, laughing. “I like to cold-call people, people who I think are outstanding community members … how you doin’?” Bullock joked. Hardy said because he’s in the Mardi Gras business, “I deal with crazy people every day. So when she said, ‘This is Sandra Bullock,’ I said, ‘This is Clark Gable,’ and I was about to hang up.” Hardy said once Bullock met the kids of the school, it cemented her decision to help out however she could. Bullock helped raise funds to rebuild the school, which has its own health clinic and close to a 100 percent graduation rate, and she spoke about how Katrina exposed the cracks in New Orleans society around the issue of poverty. “It opened up something that I don’t think people knew about or maybe didn’t want to see,” she said. “But right here under this roof, there are souls and spirits and young people who don’t come from any money but carry this extraordinary spirit to override that, suck in every ounce of education that the school provides and get out of here and create a life for them that is beautiful and fulfilling … let this school be an example of how we don’t need to leave anyone behind.” With her adoption of Nola-born Louie, whom she calls her “little Cajun cookie,” finalized, Bullock explained the relief she felt to finally have him all to herself. “It felt like it was time,” she said of the long process of adoption, noting that she did not cut any corners or ask for favors based on her fame. “It was nice to have someone say, ‘I think you’re a fit parent.’ ” She also talked about his “healthy” poop schedules, the shift in priorities a child brings to a parent’s life and the secret of how she kept Louie’s adoption, well, a secret. “It takes good people with integrity,” she said, explaining how she was able to hide the bombshell from the prying press even as she was basking in an Oscar win for “The Blind Side.” “Human beings exist that have integrity, that know how to keep their mouth shut. That know the bigger picture, that don’t sell out their friends,” she said. “Everything passes, they know if they screw up, they’re not coming up on the next vacation, I’m not gonna babysit their kids … I will cut them. I will take them down … I have friends and family that are filled with massive amounts of integrity. It shouldn’t be an oddity.” Though Jesse James and the divorce did not come up and Lauer kept the questions mostly benign, Bullock pointedly used the word “integrity” several times in the interview, perhaps as a not-so-coded statement on her feelings of betrayal in the messy divorce caused by James’ multiple infidelities. Related Photos The Evolution Of: Sandra Bullock

View original post here:
Sandra Bullock Shares Love For New Orleans On ‘Today’

WaPo Front Page Implies Beck Can’t Lead Christian Right: He’s Not Really a Christian

The Washington Post put Glenn Beck on the front page again Tuesday with the headline “Beck’s marriage of politics and religion raising questions: Commentator may be unlikely leader for conservative Christians.” Post religion correspondent Michelle Boorstein underlined why: Beck’s Mormonism. He sounded like an evangelist at his rally, and “Yet the Mormon convert seems an unlikely leader for conservative Christians, many of whom don’t regard Mormonism as part of their faith.” It’s clear that the Post editors are furious that Beck questioned Barack Obama’s claim to “committed” Christianity, so they are turning the tables. That theme runs through the whole Boorstein story, which raised the question if Beck had “seized the mantle of the religious right.” Salem Radio hosts and executives clearly aren’t a stable of Beck fans: “Politically, everyone is with it, but theologically, when he says the country should turn back to God, the question is: Which God?” said Tom Tradup, vice president for news and talk at Salem Radio Network, which serves more than 2,000 mostly Christian stations. “How much of this is turning to God? How much is religious revival and how much is a snake oil medicine show?” Boorstein also quoted Salem host Janet Mefferd, who was just picked up nationally by Salem in March. (Beck’s radio show is syndicated by Premiere Radio Networks.) Boorstein left the Salem affiliation out of the Mefferd quote. She didn’t like his talk of divine destiny: “I’m a little nervous about that kind of talk,” said Janet Mefferd, a nationally syndicated Christian talk show host who said most callers Monday wanted to talk about Beck. “I know he means well and loves this country, but he doesn’t know enough about theology to know what kind of effect he’s having. Christians are hearing something different than what he thinks he’s saying.” Mefferd’s website also links to an article insisting if Beck truly embraces Mormonism, he is not a Christian. The Post’s On Faith blog was explicit in a headline: Is Obama a Christian? Is Beck?  Glenn Beck, a Mormon, says Obama is not a Christian. It’s not uncommon for Christians to question Mormon theology. What’s uncommon is a liberal newspaper like The Washington Post suggesting someone’s not Christian enough for the Christian right. It’s like letting abortion advocates pick who leads the pro-life movement. The first Christian leader featured in the story was Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention, who found Beck’s attempt to get the blessings of religious-right leaders “extraordinary…I’ve never heard a cultural figure of that popularity taking that overtly about his faith. He sounded like Billy Graham.” Boorstein later added: Although he doesn’t consider Mormons to be Christians, Land said he agrees with Beck’s basic premise that American society must be “rebuilt from the bottom up.” Land accepted an invitation to be part of a group of more than 200 clergy members whom Beck calls his “Black Robed Regiment,” a reference to pastors from the Revolutionary War who stirred up opposition to colonial rule. Asked who would be considered conservative Christian leaders today – with Graham in his 90s and the recent death of Jerry Falwell – Land said that “leaders are leaders because people follow them. Obviously, Glenn Beck is a leader. He’s in a category by himself. He’s not a minister, he’s not a politician.” The most ridiculous sentence in Boorstein’s story is yet another lame definition of “liberation” theology: To those who embrace it, liberation theology is a means to empower the poor, the weak and politically oppressed. The term became politicized during the 2008 presidential campaign because it is used by Obama’s controversial former pastor, Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. As Stanley Kurtz noted, “Theologically,” Wright’s theological hero James Cone affirms, “Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man ‘the devil.'” Cone also wrote : “If God is not for us and against White people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of Black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the Black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” But The Washington Post thinks all the religious controversy belongs with Beck, not Barack Obama’s longtime pastor.

Read the original post:
WaPo Front Page Implies Beck Can’t Lead Christian Right: He’s Not Really a Christian