Tag Archives: msnbc

Ratigan Gets ‘Raw’: Says America Didn’t End Slavery, Just Outsourced It to China

Leave it to Dylan Ratigan, one of the star personalities at MSNBC who seems to be constantly looking for a reason to be angry. On his July 12 show, Ratigan posed his view on how trade between China and the United States operates. According to Ratigan, importing products where labor costs are significantly lower is akin to slavery. He specifically named Foxconn, a company that manufactures iPhones and iPads for Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ). (h/t @KenShepherd ) “Do you want to get raw?” Ratigan said. “Let’s say that the American people happily, logically apathetic are perfectly happy basically with a slave culture of illegals and outsourced slaves in China making iPhones at Foxconn and that for as much as we talk about the liberation of the slaves and we like to pat ourselves on the back for the Civil War – got a big statue of Abe Lincoln. All we’ve really done is alter the color of some our slaves and moved them to other countries. Is that too extreme on my part, Matt?” What Ratigan doesn’t realize or isn’t willing to concede is that the industrialization of China hasn’t just made it possible for Americans to have cheap products or American corporations to make more money, but it has rescued the nation from poverty and propelled to China to a global power and could be a model for other nations . And as for Ratigan’s Foxconn example, the Associated Press reported the technology company is acknowledging its labor issues . But he still referred to their employees as “a slave.” “I think if you ask the kids making iPhones for Americans at Foxconn in China at a nice profit margin for an American corporation, they might think they’re more like a slave ,” Ratigan said.

See the article here:
Ratigan Gets ‘Raw’: Says America Didn’t End Slavery, Just Outsourced It to China

Guess Which Liberal TV News Host This Is

This is a high school picture of a perilously liberal television news host:   Can you guess who it is? (answer follows, h/t TVNewser): Tough to believe that’s Rachel Maddow:  The “before” picture apparently comes from her high school yearbook. For those interested, Maddow grew up in Castro Valley, California, which is a town a few miles away from Oakland across the Bay from San Francisco. Exit question: would Maddow’s program be more popular if she was still a blond, or would her liberal views still interfere with her success? 

See the rest here:
Guess Which Liberal TV News Host This Is

Imagine If a Conervative Had Said It: Child- and Cop-killer Edition

Remember when media liberals were insisting ( falsely, by the way ) that RedState’s Erick Erickson had advocated shooting a census taker? Well imagine that a journalist had approached, say, Dick Armey and the following exchange had ensued. Then try to imagine what the media’s response would be. JOURNO: Obviously you don’t believe in killing census workers. ARMEY: Umm, not in that context, no sir. No, no. JOURNO: Okay, in what context? ARMEY: Just for the sake of this interview, no context. I don’t believe in that. There are too many other government forces out here that are much more powerful that I as a man would focus on. I wouldn’t focus on the census workers, sir, I’d focus on the police. Replace “census workers” with “babies” and “government” with “white,” and you have the exact statement from Malik Zulu Shabazz, leader of the New Black Panther Party, made in an interview with Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher (video below the fold). “So,” writes Tabitha Hale at RedState, “just for the sake of this interview, killing white babies is not okay. But those other times, in the proper context? It’s totally okay. You know, as long as the crackers are out of the way.” Mark Potok, please call your office . Oh the howling that would ensue if any Tea Party leader, let alone the head of a prominent organization like FreedomWorks, made a statement like that. “Killing census workers is not as productive as killing cops,” is what it would, rightly, be boiled down to. Shabazz is saying that he considers violence towards police officers to be a more productive activity in battling white people than killing their children. Phew. What a relief. Where is the media on this? Where is Chris Matthews to devote an entire hour-long special to the dangers of militant black supremacy groups, as he did with the Tea Party? Where is Rachel Maddow to devote an hour of her time to warning viewers that violent rhetoric can incite violent action, as she did in the context of the Oklahoma City bombing, naturally blaming it on conservatives? Where is Joe Klein to remind us of the definition of sedition — “conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of the state, in his words — and to accuse these groups of ” rubbing right up close ” to doing just that? Where are the host of media personalities who painted the Hutaree militia and a vague threat of “right-wing extremism” as the biggest threat to American peace since 9/11? They are all silent, because accusing the New Black Panthers of fomenting violence does not fit the narrative — it does not serve their political ends. And this is not some obscure member of the group holding a sign demanding that we “water the tree of liberty” — to use a Tea Party equivalent. This is the leader of a prominent (for a wacky fringe group) organization issuing a thinly-veiled endorsement of violence against police officers. The lack of condemnation even remotely similar to the hit jobs on the Tea Party movement is quite telling.

Continued here:
Imagine If a Conervative Had Said It: Child- and Cop-killer Edition

Schultz Warns America: Pay More Welfare Or Become ‘Third-World Country’

The time-temp clock down at the bus station here read 104 degrees this afternoon. We can’t offer readers cooler weather, but perhaps they’ll settle for some comic relief . . . On his MSNBC show this evening, Ed Schultz warned that unless the US pays out more in welfare, we risk becoming a “Third-World country.”  Schultz said it twice, so apparently it wasn’t a bizarre one-time brain camp. Ed’s on a crusade to have unemployment insurance payments extended.  Note: unemployment “insurance.”  So once payments are extended beyond what’s provided for, it’s no longer insurance: it’s welfare. But that didn’t stop Schultz from suggesting that paying more welfare is all that stands between America becoming the next Zimbabwe . . . ED SCHULTZ: It’s unconscionable what we are putting these Americans through.  And I will tell you this: this is how Third World countries get started. A bit later, Schultz floated his cockamamie theory to a “union political consultant,” who was only too happy to agree. SCHULTZ: This is going down the road of a Third World country. This is the issue: what we’re going to do with the unemployed? Tell me if I’m wrong. CHUCK ROCHA: You’re exactly right, Ed.

See more here:
Schultz Warns America: Pay More Welfare Or Become ‘Third-World Country’

MSNBC’s Donny Deutsch Disparages Sarah Palin’s ‘Mama Grizzlies’ Video as ‘Insulting’ to Women

Donny Deutsch was a lonely man on today’s “Morning Joe.” The only panelist to decry Sarah Palin’s inspiring new video designed to galvanize conservative women for the midterm elections, the MSNBC contributor puzzled even his liberal colleagues. “I actually think it’s insulting to a lot of women,” thundered Deutsch. “I’m going to tell you why. It’s the same reason why every time they do ‘100 most successful women in business’ cover stories.” New York Times writer Andrew Ross Sorkin and Time magazine’s Mark Halperin interjected to refute Deutsch, but the determined advertising guru just talked over them: “Listen to me! The American public wants more than ‘I protect my cubs.'” Halperin, who recently referred to Republicans as “childish” and “churlish,” argued the video humanizes Palin’s image and helps the former Alaska governor connect with everyday Americans. “With the exception of her book tour, this is I think her best moment since the campaign ended,” claimed Halperin. With all the subtlety of an air horn, Deutsch revealed the source of his visceral antipathy for Palin: “I’m a Democrat, I really hope she’s going to do Iowa and she’s going to win South Carolina and she’s the party’s candidate because she’s unelectable.” This is far from Deutsch’s first foray into the business of insults. As NewsBusters reported in February, Deutsch disparaged Republican Senate candidate Marco Rubio, son of Cuban exiles, as a “coconut” on HLN’s “Joy Behar Show.” He tweeted an apology the next day. Perhaps Deutsch thinks his well-documented experience in the art of insulting allows him to speak authoritatively on such matters. The transcript of the relevant portion of the segment can be found below: MSNBC Morning Joe July 8, 2010 8:27 a.m. EDT MIKA BRZEZINSKI, co-host: Wow, alright. Pat, did you like it? PAT BUCHANAN, MSNBC analyst: I want to hear his comment. DONNY DEUTSCH, MSNBC contributor: I actually think it’s insulting to a lot of women. I’m going to tell you why. It’s the same reason why every time they do “100 most successful women in business” cover stories. ANDREW ROSS SORKIN, The New York Times: Oh, no. DEUTSCH: Listen to me! The American public wants more than “I protect my cubs.” And we all know she’s an interesting, compelling woman. There are real problems now. There’s 10 percent unemployment and what does the fact that “I am woman, hear me roar” have to do with solving that? BUCHANAN: Do you get out of the Hamptons a lot? DEUTSCH: Stop with this elitist, leftist thing. (Crosstalk) BUCHANAN: She has a sense of humor. She’s talking about women and others, “we’re all going to get together and we’re going to change things in November.” (Crosstalk) DEUTSCH: She’s a fascinating media critic. It’s not going to change one person’s opinion about what they think of her. BUCHANAN: You’re all prose, no poetry. I mean, really. DEUTSCH: We already know she’s this interesting woman. That’s great. I got that. MARK HALPERIN, Time magazine: With the exception of her book tour, this is I think her best moment since the campaign ended. DEUTSCH: I can’t believe I’m listening to you guys say that. It’s just like, there’s nothing there. HALPERIN: I’ll tell you the two things that I think are there. Three things. Number one, if the Republican Party can harness centrist and right women in these midterm elections, it can affect the entire balance of power in Congress. Number two, it humanizes her in a way on her own terms. DEUTSCH: She’s always been humanized. HALPERIN: No, but this is a more accessible humanity to people outside her base. And the third thing it does, which I think is incredibly important, is it gives the Republican Party an emotional leader. That’s what they need above all else. Pat talked before whether they have a “Contract for America,” they need emotion and personality to say “we’re marching toward this November election day” and this is as good as anything I’ve seen the party do. BUCHANAN: You got to get beyond position papers and all this straight ideology and get into personality and humanity. She’s adding these dimensions to her base and she’s got a hardcore conservative ideology or philosophy but she’s adding a softening dimension to her which is very powerful. DEUTSCH: I’m a Democrat, I really hope she’s going to do Iowa and she’s going to win South Carolina and she’s the party’s candidate because she’s unelectable. She’s unelectable in the general election. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Follow this link:
MSNBC’s Donny Deutsch Disparages Sarah Palin’s ‘Mama Grizzlies’ Video as ‘Insulting’ to Women

LeBronomics: Could High Taxes Influence James’ Team Decision?

While sports reporters have sought agents and teammates for the inside scoop on where NBA superstar free agent LeBron James will sign, there’s another person who may know The King’s next move: his accountant. In a  July 1 blog post , the New York Post warned that “dysfunctional lawmakers in Albany” could cost the state a chance to bring the coveted athlete to New York. “If  LeBron James  goes to the Miami Heat instead of the [New York] Knicks, blame our dysfunctional lawmakers in Albany, who have saddled top-earning New Yorkers with the highest state and city income taxes in the nation, soon to be 12.85 percent on top of the IRS bite,” the Post said. The tax savings for James in Miami over New York City would be staggering, according to the Post’s analysis. “On a five-year contract worth $96 million — what he’d get from the Knicks or the Heat — LeBron would pay $12.34 million in New York taxes.” Florida has no state income tax. New Jersey and Ohio, the other reported frontrunners to attract James, also have state income taxes, but they are not as his as in New York. Based on a $96 million contract, James would pay  $5.69 million in state taxes  if he re-signed with the Cleveland Cavaliers. If he signed with the New Jersey Nets, James would pay $ 10.32 million in state taxes . The New York Post isn’t the only media outlet using “LeBronomics.” In her  July 8 EconWatch  post, CBSNews.com’s Jill Schlesinger dubbed yesterday’s market rally “The LeBron James rally.” Robert Schoenberger and Teresa Dixon Murray of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer estimated that downtown Cleveland businesses will lose $48 million  over the course of the NBA season without James. Like this article?   Sign up  for “The Balance Sheet,” BMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter.

The rest is here:
LeBronomics: Could High Taxes Influence James’ Team Decision?

AP’s Bauder: CNN’s Nasr Fired for Praising ‘Inspiration’ for ‘Hezbollah Militant Movement’

Reporting on CNN’s firing of Octavia Nasr, AP’s David Bauder buried the lede in his 7-paragraph July 8 story. Here’s Bauder’s fourth paragraph wherein he described the Lebanese cleric that Nasr had praised as “[o]ne of Hezbollah’s giants [she] respects a lot” (emphasis mine): Lebanon’s Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah died Sunday after a long illness. He was staunchly anti-American and linked to bombings that killed more than 260 Americans , a charge he denied.  Here’s Bauder’s lead paragraph: NEW YORK — Octavia Nasr has been fired. CNN fired the editor responsible for Middle Eastern coverage after she posted a note   on Twitter expressing admiration for a late Lebanese cleric considered an inspiration for the Hezbollah militant movement.  Wouldn’t a better lede incorporate elements of the fourth paragraph? Something like: Octavia Nasr has been fired. CNN fired the editor responsible for Middle Eastern coverage after she posted a note on Twitter expressing admiration for late Lebanese cleric who has been linked to bombings that have killed more than 260 Americans. Although Hezbollah is on the U.S. State Department’s list of terrorist organizations — listed as ” Hizballah (Party of God) ” — the only place the word “terrorist” appears in Bauder’s piece is in the final paragraph and even that is in a quote by Nasr herself, apologizing for her offending tweet: She [Nasr] wrote that Fadlallah was “revered across borders yet designated a terrorist. Not the kind of life to be commenting about in a brief tweet. It’s something I deeply regret.” But [CNN senior vice president for international newsgathering Parisa] Khosravi said in a memo Wednesday that she spoke with Nasr and “we have decided that she will be leaving the company.” 

See the rest here:
AP’s Bauder: CNN’s Nasr Fired for Praising ‘Inspiration’ for ‘Hezbollah Militant Movement’

MSNBC: ‘New Jobless Claims Decline By Over 200,000’

Recovery summer just keeps getting better and better.  News outlets such as MSNBC.com announce “New jobless claims drop sharply.”  Although the unadjusted data reflect an actual increase, the media are reporting a seasonally adjusted drop of 21,000 in jobless claims.   But that wasn’t good enough for MSNBC. While broadcasting an Obama speech during Andrea Mitchell Reports, the screen crawl reported “NEW JOBLESS CLAIMS DECLINE BY OVER 200,000.” OK, mistakes happen.  But my guess is that if the error reflected poorly on the Obama administration, someone would have caught the error pronto.  An hour later, MSNBC Live anchored by Tamron Hall was still featuring the same mistake.         

View original post here:
MSNBC: ‘New Jobless Claims Decline By Over 200,000’

More Kos-MSNBC Drama: Phil Griffin Bans Markos From Guest Appearances

When you’re too crazy for MSNBC… Markos Moulitsas, founder of the far-left blog Daily Kos, announced today that he has been ” blacklisted ” by MSNBC for taunting “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough. “I just don’t know how one could reasonably expect to be welcomed onto our network while publicly antagonizing one of our hosts at the same time,” MSNBC president Phil Griffin told Moulitsas. Griffin’s ostracism marks the second instance in recent days that a prominent MSNBC personality has spurned Kos or his blog. A couple weeks ago, Keith Olbermann accounced he would no longer be writing for the site. He returned a few days later. Still, there seem to be some reservations even at liberal MSNBC about the often crude, pugilistic style employed by so many of the Kossacks. What set off the most recent tiff? A tweet exchange, recounted below the fold. JoeNBC: The Sestak story is as unbelievable a cover story as Nixon throwing little Checkers under the bus. A farce on it’s face. Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1. The press will let this laughable story slide. markos: Like story of a certain dead intern. RT @JoeNBC: Luckily for the White House, the media has been negligent on this story since Day 1. Markos: But if you want to talk about bullshit “scandals”, @JoeNBC, there’s this one about Joe Sestak and the White House you might’ve heard of. JoeNBC: @markos Unbelievable. You have a long history of spreading lies suggesting I am a murderer. This is the 3rd or 4th time by my count. Markos: @JoeNBC, I’ve never suggested you’re a murderer. I’ve noted media hypocrisy in going after Gary Condit. But he was Dem. You aren’t. JoeNBC: Anyone in media who interviews @markos, know that you’re extending your credibility to someone who regularly suggests that I’m a murderer. Markos: A bit touchy, @JoeNBC? Links for where I accuse you of being a murderer please. Moulitsas didn’t get any links, but he did get this message from Griffin: Markos, Blog if you must, but here is my on the record statement to you which I ask that you print in full: Yes, after I became aware of the ugly cheap shot  you  took at Joe on Twitter, I asked the teams to take a break from booking you on our shows for a while. I found the comments to be in poor taste, and utterly uncalled for in a civil discourse. I’m hoping this will be only temporary and that the situation can be resolved in a mature fashion, but until then I just don’t know how one could reasonably expect to be welcomed onto our network while publicly antagonizing one of our hosts at the same time. The DailyKos community has been among the most supportive of MSNBC, and we continue to appreciate that support. Markos thinks that Griffin responded the way he did in defense of the cable network’s “token conservative.” “I’ve criticized Chris Matthews before, sometimes harshly,” he whined, “and it never led to me being banned.” Moulitsas fails to grasp — as one Kos reader put it — that he didn’t go after Matthews like that… I mean don’t get me wrong, that tweet was some piping hot ether and I admire it from a trolling perspective, but c’mon. You were clearly taking a swing at Joe’s jaw with the “dead intern” line. You connected, his skull reeled like Balboa in Round 10, he winced in pain. You weren’t trying to make some larger point about media bias. You were looking to bust somebody upside they head. And that is the Kossack way. Just not the MSNBC way, apparently.

Link:
More Kos-MSNBC Drama: Phil Griffin Bans Markos From Guest Appearances

Contessa Brewer: MSNBC Audition Like ‘Marine Corps Obstacle Course;’ Whines About Guests ‘With An Agenda’

In an interview on MediaBistro.com’s ‘Media Beat,’ MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer told TVNewser editor Kevin Allocca about the cable network’s high standards in its audition process: “…it’s got to be like the Marine Corps obstacle course in order to land this job.” She later complained about “difficult” guests: “When someone comes on with an agenda and their agenda is to take you down.” Allocca asked Brewer about some her toughest interviews. She responded by describing certain guests who “come on and they are prepared to be challenging and to be difficult.” Two examples came to her mind, former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Republican Senator Judd Gregg. In recalling a January interview with Gregg, Brewer whined about how “it was a difficult interview to conduct.” In reality, Gregg simply pointed out Brewer’s liberal bias on the issue of government spending, after she equated Republican calls for less spending with cutting off funding for schools. Gregg pointed out that she was “being fundamentally dishonest” in her reporting.     During the Media Beat interview, she said of guests like Gregg: “…when you have guests on who are difficult or if they’re – if they’re sticking they’re heels in the ground and they’re really – you just end it, you move on.” Here is a transcript of the first part of the Media Beat interview posted July 5 on TVNewser.com: KEVIN ALLOCCA: Hello, and welcome to MediaBistro.com’s Media Beat. We’re here today with Contessa Brewer and I’m Kevin Allocca, the editor of TVNewser. Thanks for joining us, Contessa. CONTESSA BREWER: I have never heard you’re name pronounced, I’m glad to know it. ALLOCCA: Really, Allocca? BREWER: Yes. ALLOCCA: So, Contessa is an anchor at MSNBC and we’re going to talk a little about you’re career and how you got there. BREWER: Okay. ALLOCCA: And like a lot of newscasters, you sort of spent some time making the rounds at some local stations, and I’m kind of wondering how did you make that jump to a major network? BREWER: Um, I went through unemployment first. That was – that was a big part of getting the job at MSNBC. Because, I had applied for a lot of jobs at stations in Boston and Los Angeles and Houston and Phoenix and there were – some of those stations, I thought, would have been a good fit for me and it just – it didn’t happen. And then my agent said MSNBC was interested and I went through a wicked audition process. I mean, this audition at MSNBC, I think, has become famous, because it is – it’s like – it’s got to be like the Marine Corps obstacle course in order to land this job, yeah. I re-wrote a lot of my scripts for this, I’m thinking I’m big stuff, right? I’m tackling the scripts for this audition and as soon as you launch into the script they’re in your ear and they’re throwing breaking news at you and they want you to jungle [juggle] it. And the thing is, is that in local news, you don’t juggle breaking news like you do in cable news. So – well, I must have – I finished the obstacle course because I landed the job, but I’ll tell you, I’ve never been through an audition like that. ALLOCCA: Really? BREWER: Yeah. ALLOCCA: I read that you had an academic background in politics, also. Do you think that that’s been an asset for you since you’ve been there? BREWER: Absolutely, I mean, you know, I studied politics in college. I went to Europe and I studied European politics. And I never – once you were in local news – I never really anticipated that I was going to use it. Here, there are – there’s really an opportunity to dive in and to see politics in action and see the storyline develop and get to know the players in a way that I just never could have imagined. ALLOCCA: I’m sure you’ve used – put that to use a lot in a lot of interviews that you’ve done and I’m kind of wondering which do feel like was one of the toughest ones that you’ve had to do? BREWER: Political interview? ALLOCCA: Or any sort of interview, actually. BREWER: Well, I think – I mean the hard thing is I do have some guests who are – they come on and they are prepared to be challenging and to be difficult, those are always the hardest interviews. When someone comes on with an agenda and their agenda is to take you down. You know, it’s challenging when you’re dealing with someone who is so well-prepared on a specific topic, you know, that they’re the expert and they’ve spent they’re whole lives diving into a certain subject and you have to play Devil’s advocate with them and challenge them on something that, you know, you spend, at best, hours preparing for. You know, I had a pretty intense interview with Michael Chertoff, back when he was the Homeland Security secretary. I had – you know there was an interview with Judd Gregg recently, where I think, you know, I think what he was expecting out of the interview and what we – and my partner at the time was Melissa Francis, when we were doing ‘It’s the Economy’ – I think that was a – you know, it was a difficult interview to conduct. But you know, usually, when you have guests on who are difficult or if they’re – if they’re sticking they’re heels in the ground and they’re really – you just end it, you move on.  

Go here to see the original:
Contessa Brewer: MSNBC Audition Like ‘Marine Corps Obstacle Course;’ Whines About Guests ‘With An Agenda’