Tag Archives: msnbc

Amidst Media Battering of Boehner, MSNBC Actually Portrays His Upbringing Positively

Amidst a war of words with the White House, character attacks from the Left, and a New York Times hit piece on his connections with lobbyists, House Minority Leader John Boehner has received positive media coverage – from MSNBC of all places. The network ran a portrait of Boehner’s childhood on its 11 a.m. news hour, and again on “Andrea Mitchell Reports” at 1 p.m. “The public hears a lot of the arguments against [Boehner] from the Left,” remarked NBC correspondent Luke Russert on the 11 a.m. MSNBC news hour Monday. “They hear that he’s a country club Republican, if you will, with extensive ties to lobbyists. But it’s quite interesting. He’s a man who comes from very humble beginnings, starting out in a big Catholic family in Reading, Ohio.” Russert narrated a piece on Boehner’s upbringing in Ohio, as one of 12 children. He interviewed one each of Boehner’s brothers and his sisters, as well as his high school football coach. Words used to describe Boehner included “bossy,” “independent,” “leadership,” “charm,” and “heart.” Other highlights included his hard work for his family’s bar and for the high school football team, as well as his taking seven years to earn his undergraduate degree because he worked during the day and took classes at night. Overall, it provided quite a humane and sympathetic look into the upbringing of a prominent Republican politician – one that usually might not be expected of MSNBC. “It’ll be interesting to see how this narrative comes out in the closing weeks of the campaign,” Russert said after the clip played. ” It certainly gives [Boehner] more of a human element as opposed to just the ‘Party of No’ face, which Democrats have been trying to stick to him in recent months and weeks.” A full transcript of the segment, which aired on September 13 at 11:34 a.m. EDT, is as follows: TAMRON HALL, MSNBC Anchor: Well there is intense scrutiny on Republican Minority Leader John Boehner today, following a scathing investigative report in the New York Times detailing Boehner’s relationship with Washington lobbyists. According to the Times, Boehner has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from his campaigns from lobbyists, and helped numerous lobbyists during his time in office. Boehner’s office denies any improper relationships, but in recent weeks President Obama has repeatedly gone after Boehner’s speeches, and really tried to portray him as the face of the Republican Party. Still, the Minority Leader us unknown to millions of Americans. NBC’s Luke Russert has a closer look at the man who could become the next Speaker of the House. And it’s interesting, Luke, in that report – about 55 percent of the people surveyed did not know who John Boehner is – LUKE RUSSERT, NBC Congressional Correspondent: It is, and a lot of the public hears a lot of the arguments against him from the Left, and definitely President Obama has tried to define Mr. Boehner in the last few weeks. They hear that he’s a country club Republican, if you will, with extensive ties to lobbyists. But it’s quite interesting. He’s a man who comes from very humble beginnings, starting out in a big Catholic family in Reading, Ohio. (Video Clip) JOHN BOEHNER, House Minority Leader: …hidden from the people? Hell no, you can’t! LUKE RUSSERT: Minority Leader John Boehner has risen to political and oratorical heights on Capitol Hill. But that trip began on another hill. BOB BOEHNER, John Boehner’s brother: If you blink, you miss the street here. RUSSERT: Hill Street, in Reading, Ohio. And at the top sits the house that he shared with 11 brothers and sisters. So you had 12 people in this house? BOB BOEHNER: Yep. RUSSERT: Or 14? Right? Because you had 12 kids. BOB BOEHNER: 14. I see the – when we were younger, that addition on the end wasn’t there. Mom and dad slept on a pull-out couch. And John, Steve and I slept in one bedroom, Nancy slept in the other bedroom. RUSSERT: Maneuvering in such a big Catholic family is where a large part of his leadership skills come from today.          BOB BOEHNER: It started right there, you know. You might have wanted something done a certain way, but it wasn’t possible because there was too many people. And so you had to figure out the best way to do something and move on with it. RUSSERT: Of course, his little sister might just say he was bossy. LYNDA MEINEKE: “Make sure you do your homework,” and “Sit up straight.” “What are you doing with your clean clothes on?” RUSSERT: Lynda still works the bar the Boehner family used to own, where John mopped floors. Back then it was named Andy’s Café, after his grandfather. RUSSERT: Did you ever get angry at him because you thought he was being too harsh on you? MEINEKE: Oh yeah, because he wasn’t mom or dad. You know, it’s like “Who are you?” RUSSERT: A teenager who rode motorcycles and played football, even when he was in pain. GERRY FAUST, Fmr. Moeller H.S. Football Coach: If he could stand the pain, he could play, because it wasn’t going to hurt him. (Unintelligible) He says, “I think the team – we need to do it to win.” RUSSERT: From his mother came his independence. MEINEKE: Stand up and speak your mind. Yeah, my mother was good at that. She just, you know – she spoke what she thought. She spoke from the heart. RUSSERT: And from his father his charm, and possibly his heart. BOB BOEHNER: My dad – (Unintelligible) I think John does the same thing – connect to people. That’s why he’s been successful. RUSSERT: The beginning of an unlikely climb, which may end with him leading 435 people in a very different house on the hill. (End Video Clip) RUSSERT: And Tamron, there you go. Quite an interesting upbringing for Mr. Boehner, learning the art of compromise dealing with 12 – 11 brothers and sisters. Another interesting antidote that I picked up there on the ground in Ohio: it took Mr. Boehner seven years to get his degree from Xavier University in Cincinnati, not because he was partying, but in fact because he was working. He got his degree, a Bachelor’s of Science in night school over the course of seven years. It’ll be interesting to see how this narrative comes out in the closing weeks of the campaign. It certainly gives him more of a human element as opposed to just the “Party of No” face, which Democrats have been trying to stick to him in recent months and weeks.       

Read more from the original source:
Amidst Media Battering of Boehner, MSNBC Actually Portrays His Upbringing Positively

MSNBC’s Wolffe Repeats Debunked Newsweek Claim of Koran Flushed Down Toilet by Guantanamo Interrogators

Appearing as a guest on Friday’s Countdown show, MSNBC political analyst Richard Wolffe – formerly of Newsweek – referred to the debunked story that was retracted by Newsweek in May 2005 which had incorrectly claimed that American interrogators at Guantanamo Bay had flushed a Koran down a toilet to intimidate Muslim prisoners. But Wolffe did not inform viewers that the story was untrue as he accused conservatives of a double standard for criticizing Newsweek’s inaccurate Koran desecration story from 2005 while not being aggressive enough in condemning Pastor Terry Jones’s declaration that he would burn the Koran on September 11. Wolffe: I’m struck all the time with this story about the experience of those of us who worked in Newsweek – not the least of whom is Mike Isikoff now at NBC News who wrote a story about the abuse of the Koran in Guantanamo Bay , and there were riots and people died and the overwhelming torrent of abuse from conservative, the echo chamber, more than elected officials I think, certainly from conservative media, was that Newsweek had lied and people died. That’s what they said. Newsweek’s erroneous story inspired riots and a significant number of deaths in 2005 before it was retracted by the magazine, although, as previously documented by the MRC, Newsweek buried its retraction. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Friday, September 10, Countdown show on MSNBC: KEITH OLBERMANN: The Republicans, on the other hand, are sounding like almost nothing. We reported Tuesday on the deafening silence of the leaders who previously told us, “Listen to General Petraeus,” and this time they had nothing to say, and obviously some have broken their silence since, but even then most have been tentative or brief or even offensive at the analysis that, or the analogy I made to Captain Chowdhury, equating the book burning to building buildings. Do you have a perception of what Republicans are trying to do or not do about this issue? RICHARD WOLFFE: Republicans are in a strange situation now, as well. The politics is weird for them. Remember that, for all the confidence about taking about Congress, there’s a certain amount of fear in the Republican party. They’re worried about the challenge from the right from the Tea Party, which in the first incident has been directed at fellow Republicans, not at Democrats. But, you know, if you’re going to equate something with Koran burning, you know, I’m struck all the time with this story about the experience of those of us who worked in Newsweek – not the least of whom is Mike Isikoff now at NBC News who wrote a story about the abuse of the Koran in Guantanamo Bay, and there were riots and people died and the overwhelming torrent of abuse from conservative, the echo chamber, more than elected officials I think, certainly from conservative media, was that Newsweek had lied and people died. That’s what they said. And I don’t hear similar things now about someone who’s abusing, threatening to abuse the Koran and the kinds of impact that the generals, the commander in chief is saying is going to happen. So if you’re going to equate things, let’s treat apples with apples.

Go here to read the rest:
MSNBC’s Wolffe Repeats Debunked Newsweek Claim of Koran Flushed Down Toilet by Guantanamo Interrogators

Crazy Larry Tongue-Lashes Trumka

Perhaps it was just a publicity stunt for his impending MSNBC show, but Lawrence O’Donnell went Crazy Larry on Morning Joe today. The lefty host of The Last Word unleashed on an unlikely target: AFL-CIO head Richard Trumka.   What ignited Larry’s tirade was Trumka’s professed concern for the contract-negotiations plight of professional football players. O’Donnell was outraged that the union honcho was spending his time on the millionaires of the NFL rather than workers such as miners who merit more concern.  Sample lines: “Exactly how many minutes of your day do you spend worrying about $15-million football players? Is this the biggest waste of your attention that could possibly come your way? Is it embarrassing for you to have to talk about these guys?” Sit back and enjoy Larry going off. Trying to comfort Trumka, Joe Scarborough assured him that he shouldn’t feel singled out: “[O’Donnell] does this to everybody. I introduced him to my mom on the streets of New York.  Fifteen minutes later she was breaking down in tears.” Aside: as a card-carrying member of Local 101 of the Pajamahadeen Bloggers Union, for whom every day is Dress Down Friday, I’m in no position to criticize another media man’s sartorial standards.  But unless Larry is working undercover for a special on street people, you have to wonder about his unkempt, unshaven look today.

See the article here:
Crazy Larry Tongue-Lashes Trumka

Cenk Uygur: The Next Leftist MSNBC Star?

Cenk Uygur (pronounced Jenk You-gurr) is profiled by media reporter James Rainey  in Wednesday’s Los Angeles Times, and it becomes quite clear the exotically-named Young Turks radio host could be the next leftist star at MSNBC. Since his friendship with Dylan Ratigan led to some guest-hosting gigs (in which he bested Ratigan in the ratings), Uygur is now part of the “family” of Bush-hating radicals: Cable executives hope fill-in hosts can at best hold on to the audiences they inherit. But MSNBC insiders said they believe Uygur did so well because many of those who watch his three-hour weekday Web program, (3 to 6 p.m. PDT) or clips on his YouTube channel jumped to MSNBC when Ratigan was out…. MSNBC President Phil Griffin called Uygur “part of our family” and expects him to get “more and more” air time, though he declined to specify in what time slots. Inside Cable News guesses it wouldn’t be any place in day time (might they dump the Hardball rerun at 7?) Or they could do an MSNBC version of  Red Eye in late night? In any case, Cenk wants to be seen on Obama’s left: “Obama spent the first two years of his administration practicing political unilateral disarmament,” he said in one salvo. “He laid down his arms to reach out to Republicans, and they ripped his arms off and clubbed him over the head with them.” Uygur has also offered these oddball utterances: Unlike Fox, MSNBC is “straight news.” He made this case with a straight face: “Is there a chance that Obama is actually more conservative than Reagan?” Days later, he added this Obama dismissal: “I didn’t realize we elected a Republican president.” As a Republican electoral wave approaches, the Tea Party is the “cancer of the Republican Party.” Most recently, he asked, “What black person, gay guy or girl, immigrant or Muslim-American in their right mind would vote for the Republican party? They might as well hang a sign around their neck saying I hate myself.” Eventually, MSNBC is going to be just wall-to-wall leftist wailers, many of them from failed talk-radio shows.

See original here:
Cenk Uygur: The Next Leftist MSNBC Star?

Psycho: Schultz Wants Troops Withdrawn From Iraq Sent Into Chicago

Can you imagine the cries of police state, racism, incipient fascism and fill-in-your-favorite-epithet if a conservative pundit—let alone a Republican president—proposed the massive insertion of US military forces into American inner cities for law enforcement purposes? But that’s precisely what Ed Schultz proposed on his MSNBC show this evening. Ed is apparently unaware that the use of the military for such law-enforcement purposes would raise serious issues under the Posse Comitatus Act.  But beyond that, it would utterly distort the mission of our military, and provoke valid civil-liberty concerns.  Schultz should try bouncing his brainstorm off the Joint Chiefs and see what kind of reception it receives.   But hey, Ed announced on this evening’s show that he will be part of a Big Labor march on Washington in DC in October.  Let that be a Dem pre-election theme: troops into Chicago! Here’s Ed at his detached-from-reality best . . . ED SCHULTZ: I woke up in Chicago, on my way to the Midwest, to a couple of truly disturbing headlines.  In Chicago, in the Tribune, front page of the Tribune, here it is [holds up paper]: 4 Killed in Southwest Side Garage Shooting. And the Sun-Times: Put the Guns Down.  This is what a gang leader says to his folks. More Americans were killed in Chicago last month than were killed in Iraq all year. Mr. President, I got a great idea as to where you can send those troops that you just brought home from Iraq.  How about Chicago, Illinois and a bunch of other big cities in this country?   It’s time we look out for our own backyard.

Link:
Psycho: Schultz Wants Troops Withdrawn From Iraq Sent Into Chicago

Matthews: Obama Should Replace Rahm Emanuel With Bloomberg, Gates With Hillary

Chris Matthews must really be getting tired of watching the man that used to give him tingles up his leg continue to get crushed in the polls, for on Friday he recommended a serious shakeup in the Obama administration. First, he want’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates to be replaced by Hillary Clinton. “With her at the Pentagon, he would forge confidence in Middle East policy,” said the “Hardball” host. But the real surprise was Matthews calling for New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to either replace Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner or Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Let me finish with tonight with a plan to strengthen America’s ability to solve its problems. It’s tough and it’s water tight. President Obama has many strengths as this country’s head of state. He’s clear minded, gifted in intellect, artful in presenting issues and his vision of leadership. However, these past two years have been a shakedown cruise. We have seen the weaknesses in this ship of state. It’s come time to shake up. This president needs to put a firm Democratic brand on his defense policy. He was smart to keep Robert Gates in the Pentagon, but Gates is a holdover from the Bush era. There’s no real connection between what the country voted for in 2008 and what we’re getting in terms of security policy. Obama needs to bridge that gap, and he needs to pick a Democratic ally as defense chief. That Democratic ally is Hillary Clinton. With her at the Pentagon, he would forge confidence in Middle East policy. Friends of Israel would know we have someone in charge of America’s military forces who has an instinctive concern for the Jewish state. A proven track record of support, it will help get the deal cooked over there and getting that deal is the very stuff of American greatness. Now to the tough one, the economy. There’s one person in this country with a track record, the communications pizzazz to help make, carry out and market the historic recovery program still needed. His name is Michael Bloomberg. Look, you can say this is outlandish that he would never take the job at Treasury or as White House chief of staff, but there is a precedent. James Baker. He made Reagan a success and Barack Obama needs a Jim Baker, someone to focus the energies of this administration on economic reconstruction, period. Someone to lay down the same strong chain of command on domestic policy that Hillary Clinton will define on the national security front. This is the answer. Enough of the solo act. President Obama needs to build a team, a phalanx, a political policy power that takes his idealism and makes it deliver in strength abroad, jobs and renewed economic confidence at home. Makes you wonder what’s happened to Matthews since Tuesday. After all, on that evening’s “Hardball,” he called Obama “almost pluperfect.” How can someone so spectacular on Tuesday need a shakeup in his administration three days later?

Go here to read the rest:
Matthews: Obama Should Replace Rahm Emanuel With Bloomberg, Gates With Hillary

CNBC’s Najarian: Drilling Moratorium ‘Shows a Tone-Deafness From This Administration’

With a 9.6 percent unemployment rate overall in the United States and unemployment rates showing an uptick in states on the Gulf of Mexico that allow offshore oil drilling, one has to wonder what the Obama administration is thinking its Draconian wide-sweeping moratorium halting deepwater drilling in the Gulf after the BP oil spill. While environmentalists are using today’s explosion on a oil production platform in the Gulf to support a drilling moratorium, critics like CNBC’s “Fast Money” panelist Jon Najarian have questioned the wisdom of the Obama administration’s decision to put up to 75,000 in limbo. “As far as what was going on in the Gulf, it shows a tone-deafness from this administration ,” Najarian said on the Sept. 2 broadcast of “Fast Money.” “I mean, I’ll pound the table for that because I’m not running for office. But I mean, this guy is tone deaf that 75,000 jobs in the Gulf of Mexico that have been idled for no good reason . It’s costing all of us and it costs all the places where they would normally spend money as well.” On Sept. 2, a federal judge denied the federal government’s request to dismiss a lawsuit challenging that moratorium. The 75,000 jobs number is a figure backed up by the Dr. Lee Hunt, president of the International Association of Drilling Contractors. In a May 13 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar , Hunt warned then the ban would eventually impact that many job in the Gulf Coast states. “Due to the Department’s order, rigs completing wells in the next weeks will be unable to take on new work,” Hunt wrote. “Over the next six weeks, up to 50 drilling rigs will complete wells and be unable to accept new work. These rigs will be idled, and those employees working directly on the rig face the prospect of unemployment, even if only temporarily. Additionally, employees of supporting service companies will also face unemployment. These workers represent a significant portion of the 75,000 hard-working individuals employed in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. The ripple effects of this abeyance of all new drilling will adversely impact coastal communities across Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi and Alabama.”

Read more:
CNBC’s Najarian: Drilling Moratorium ‘Shows a Tone-Deafness From This Administration’

Matthews to Dem Candidate: I Hope Your Party Gets Organized and Wins This Thing!

It’s no secret that Chris Matthews once flirted with the idea of  running for Senate in Pennsylvania , but since he didn’t throw his hat into that race, the Hardball host, on Thursday night, did everything he could to help Joe Sestak beat Republican Pat Toomey, as he urged: “I hope your party gets organized up there, because the Democratic Party of Ed Rendell and you and all those other guys ought to get together with Brady and win this thing!” And even before Matthews invited viewers to “Meet Joe Sestak” in an interview segment, the MSNBCer began cheerleading for him in a preview as he teased: “Up next, Joe Sestak from my home state of Pennsylvania, he’s fighting hard, the good fight against Pat Toomey, the Club for Growther of the far right.” The following exchanges were aired on the September 2 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Congressman Joe Sestak pulled off a big upset back in May when he beat Arlen Specter, he had been senator forever in Pennsylvania, in that primary. Sestak may need another upset come November. He faces a tough political climate up there. Pat Toomey, the Club for Growther of the far right is averaging a six-point gain on him right now in the latest pollsters average poll. Congressman Sestak joins right now us now. You know Pennsylvania, as you know, I’m talking to an expert, it’s a purple state. It’s somewhere in the middle. It’s a John Wayne state. It’s not a far right or far left state. How come Toomey is doing well when he’s on the far right side? What is going on? Isn’t he a [Rick] Santorum type? … MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about the support from the establishment up there. You beat the heck out of these people. You took the money people in big Philly. You took the machine, such as it was, on that day, it could be more interested, I think, on general election day and you beat the heck out of them. You pulled the biggest upset. Are those guys still mad at you for beating, the underdog, for beating their guy Specter? JOE SESTAK: I’m told they’re all gonna be there. A lot of them are gone for pre-Labor Day. And they’re gonna be there right after Labor Day. Look, I’m not going to depend upon that. You know we raised close to $2 million in four weeks, right after the election. We’re out there working every day. But more than that, I am going to help leverage those centers of excellence. I also have over 25 offices open, 25,000 phone calls a day since 1 January. We’re gonna build a warfare coalition just like those 30 ships I had when I was a Navy admiral, doing the retaliatory strikes off Afghanistan, working together. But I also want you to know this Chris. I’m also focused on moderate Republicans and independents. I think when they find how extreme Congressman Toomey is, I mean if you liked Rick Santorum, you’re gonna love Pat Toomey. MATTHEWS: How is he extreme? Give me some examples! I know I asked about the steel industry a while ago and he said basically he’s a free marketer, “Let it rot! Don’t do anything. The government has no responsibility to save industries that are in trouble.” What’s your view and what’s wrong with his? SESTAK: Well let me tell you, in his book he calls it “creative destruction.” It’s okay that we have China subsidizing their exports because it’ll have creative destruction in America where people will be unemployed, but they’ll find a job somewhere else. You know zero, zero taxes for corporations where you don’t have to pay for it. Look when he was in Hong Kong, working for a Hong Kong billionaire, he actually worked on those currency swaps that helped China keep down over the years those, the, the value of, of the, the wan. And so we have, as someone who believes “benefit big business, benefit Wall Street and wealth might trickle down.” Look he actually believed, when he was on the Small Business committee, he slashed in half the small business budget. He voted against studies for women to find out why are they’re only getting two percent of all federal contracts supposed to go to small businesses? He just voted against that. Time after time, whether its education. Here’s Philadelphia, you talk about a challenge in Philadelphia? Only about 28 percent of African-American males are graduating from high school there. And Chris it’s only 33 percent of whites. And so I’m on the Education committee. This is about the common good. And he helped slash the education budget by $3 billion and voted against Pell Grants. He, what he did when he was president and this is the worst, I think. When he was president of Club for Growth — and I like Pat, I’ve had a beer with him — but when he was president of Club for Growth which John McCain called “a grab bag for the ultra rich,”when he was president he actually had as his principle mission purging the Republican Party of moderates and went after Senator Lincoln Chafee and others. MATTHEWS: I know. SESTAK: In my mind we don’t need an ideology, we need someone who is willing to work. MATTHEWS: Is he a right winger? Is he a right winger? Is he a right winger? SESTAK: He, he’s farther from the right wing. Yes he’s much, he’s extreme. Look… MATTHEWS: Okay let me ask you, let’s talk, let’s talk turkey, Admiral, Congressman. I mean you deserve both titles. You’ve earned them. Let me ask you this. Are you gonna get Bill Clinton in there? It seems to me that if you look at Southwestern Pennsylvania, if you look at anywhere in that state, among the African-American community, which has been hammered with unemployment. They, if they had the jobs that the Irish guys had, in the neighborhoods I grew up in today, they’d be unbelievably middle class. They’d be in such a great shape. Those jobs are gone, those steel jobs. Let me ask you. Are you gonna bring Bill Clinton in there? Because, it seems to me, he would be even better than the President, to help you in Pennsylvania? SESTAK: Yes. Yeah he’s already come in for Scranton. Great rally. Unfortunately I was down in Washington for the good business of voting for that EFNEP bill that Congressman Toomey opposed and would have had 12,000 Pennsylvanians… MATTHEWS: Well you gonna bring him back? SESTAK: …if we hadn’t passed it. Absolutely. Actually I was talking with them the other day and they just wanted to know what days. They tell me I’m their top priority and I’m gonna keep working on that. So, I hope to see him out there a lot. MATTHEWS: Well I hope your party, I hope your party gets organized up there, because the Democratic Party of Ed Rendell and you and all those other guys ought to get together with Brady and win this thing! Anyway, thank you Congressman Joe Sestak, running for Pennsylvania senator.

Excerpt from:
Matthews to Dem Candidate: I Hope Your Party Gets Organized and Wins This Thing!

MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ Skips Any Talk to Guests About James Lee; Al Gore Mentioned at 6 AM

MSNBC’s Morning Joe seemed to be trying very hard to avoid the Discovery Channel hostage incident on Thursday morning — even though NBC had the exclusive of speaking with hostage-taker James Jay Lee before he was shot. With Willie Geist and Chris Jansing guest-hosting the show, they talked a lot about Middle East peace negotiations, and Hurricane Earl, and sinking Democratic midterm prospects, and even anonymously sourced hit jobs against alleged serial liar Sarah Palin in Vanity Fair . In the whole three hours, they never blabbed with guests about James Lee’s inspirational figures or his ultra-left website weirdness. The subject only came up about six minutes into the 6 am hour, before a Tom Costello news report. Jansing relayed: “Disturbing details are emerging about that gunman who was shot and killed yesterday after holding three people hostage at the Discovery Channel’s headquarters in Maryland. Court records show the 43-year-old, identified as James Jay Lee, was a radical environmentalist who said he experienced quote, ‘an awakening’ when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth. In a manifesto Lee wrote, he also railed against shows like Kate Plus Eight for encouraging the birth rate [of] quote, “parasitic human infants.” At 7:30, after another airing of the Costello report, Geist and Jansing talked to NBC News producer Rob Rivas, but even as Rivas vaguely mentioned the Lee manifesto, the hosts stepped right around any loose talk about Lee’s eco-inspirations: GEIST: First of all, how did you get the guy on the horn? RIVAS: Well, we had initial reports of some kind of situation at the Discovery Channel but nothing confirmed so as part of our standard operating procedure, we started calling authorities and one of the places we happened to call was the discovery channel and in the course of making that conversation, he answered the phone. GEIST: He answered the phone. CHRIS JANSING: I mean, what goes through your mind? You’re calling to get a confirmation presumably from somebody who works in public relations for discovery and next thing you know, you have a potentially volatile situation on your hands. RIVAS: Well, absolutely, and you know, as soon as we found out that to the best of our knowledge this was, in fact, the gentleman who was making threats against the building, we contacted the police immediately, and we just — I did my best just to keep him on the line. I figured if he was talking to me, he wasn’t doing anything else in the building, hopefully. MIKE BARNICLE: When did you realize that you were talking to the suspect? RIVAS: Well, he sounded like an individual when we called the facility that didn’t belong there. He seemed a little bit anxious and he identified himself right away as the gentleman who was, in fact, you know, wearing a device. BARNICLE: There was a very good line of inquiry, just in the clips that we played. How did you get there with the questions? It was very good. RIVAS: Well, you know, you never want to be part of the story. I just wanted to get as much information that was pertinent to hopefully report it in the future, but also you want to keep him talking. He was very actively promoting his website, which was sort of a manifesto, if you will, of several bullet points. So at the same time we were asking him questions, we were reading the website where we could go next with the questioning, primarily just to keep him on the line. That was the obvious place to shift to the politics, but MSNBC wasn’t going there. GEIST: How long did you keep him on the phone? How long was the call? RIVAS: Probably about 10, 15 minutes max. JANSING: Did he hang upon you ? RIVAS: He did. He got another phone call or a phone rang in the background and he dropped off of our line. GEIST: And at what stage of the crisis was this? Was this early on? Was this right before he was shot, or where was this? RIVAS: This was several hours before he was shot. I believe the police or someone was trying to get in contact with him because it probably continued another three hours before it ended. Mike Barnicle strangely thought of the human connection between reporter and eco-terrorist, but Rivas admirably shifted the sympathy back to the innocent folks: BARNICLE: How’d you feel? You know, you talked to him at 2:00 and at 5:30, the guy you talked to on the phone had been shot to death. RIVAS: It’s surreal, and I’m just glad nobody in the building, none of the innocent folks were hurt. GEIST: Rob, you did a great job on the phone, keeping him on the line. Good questions. Thanks for coming in to tell us about it. Rivas might not have been the first choice for windy analysis of the Big Picture. But it’s fascinating that MSNBC can do entire one-hour Chris Matthews specials about the frightening, impending dangers of right-wing rhetoric, and then go all silent when the threats and violence emerge from the other side of the ideological fence.

Continued here:
MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ Skips Any Talk to Guests About James Lee; Al Gore Mentioned at 6 AM

Vanity Fair’s Palin Antagonist: ‘I Have a Lot in Common with this Woman’

The author of a  10,600-word Vanity Fair hit piec e on Sarah Palin is defending his work, claiming he set out to defend the former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate, but that the resulting article “was forced on me by the facts.” Michael Gross appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Sept. 2 to discuss his article in the October issue of Vanity Fair. The piece depicts Palin as a volatile, vengeful, mean-spirited figure, although Gross  only managed to find one person  willing to speak critically of Palin on the record. “The worst stuff isn’t even in there,” Gross said on “Morning Joe” when asked about the extreme picture he paints of Palin. “You know, I couldn’t believe these stories either when I first heard them and I started the story with the prejudice in her favor. I have a lot in common with this woman. I’m a small town person, I’m a Christian. I think that a lot of her criticisms of the media actually have something to them and I figured she’d gotten a bum ride but everybody close to her tells the same story.” Yet for someone so supposedly enamored with Palin, Gross sure turned quickly. He said Palin is “a person for whom there is no topic too small to lie about,” citing a speech in Wichita in which Palin contradicted other statements she’d made about finding out her son, Trig, would have special needs. “She lies about everything,” Gross continued, without offering other examples. “She lies about her personal life. She lies about, she lies about …” At one point, Gross said that “if we start returning to the standard that … a politician has to tell the truth, then she is out of here because she can’t stand up to that.” When host Willie Geist pressed Gross on criticism that his piece is a hatchet job, the author maintained that “it’s exactly the opposite. As I said before, I started this with every good intention toward her. I was just shocked and appalled at every step at what I found and I wrote this story, you know, sort of against my will. It wasn’t what I wanted to write, it wasn’t what I wanted to find. It was forced on me by the facts.”  Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by  clicking   here.

Go here to read the rest:
Vanity Fair’s Palin Antagonist: ‘I Have a Lot in Common with this Woman’