Tag Archives: msnbc

Olbermann Cherry-picks AP to Accuse Alan Simpson of Being Anti-Veterans

Keith Olbermann on Wednesday cherry-picked an Associated Press article in order to accuse former Wyoming Sen. Alan Simpson (R) of being anti-Vietnam veterans. For some background, AP’s Mike Baker wrote Tuesday about concerns Simpson, as the co-chair of President Obama’s deficit reduction commission, had involving changes the Veterans Administration made to the number of maladies Vietnam vets could be covered for as a result of exposure to the defoliant Agent Orange. Much as he often does as one of America’s least professional journalists, Olbermann on MSNBC’s “Countdown” took a grand total of two sentences from Baker’s article to convict Simpson of wrongdoing (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): KEITH OLBERMANN: Enter former Republican Senator Alan Simpson. Last week, Senator Simpson, former senator Simpson, who co-chairs the President’s panel on reducing spending, said of Social Security America was suckling on a milk cow. And the executive director of the Older Women’s League who had dared complain about his previous sexist language should get a real job. This week Simpson went after Vietnam veterans. Here’s what he said about providing decades-late for the cost of treating conditions that might be linked to Agent Orange. Quote, “It’s the kind of thing that’s just driving us to this $1 trillion, 400 billion deficit this year…The irony [is] that the veterans who served this country are now in a way not helping us to save the country in this fiscal mess.” Vietnam vets not helping to save the country because they insisted on breathing in the toxic defoliant their country sprayed on them while fighting the war their country drafted them to fight. The law that provided for their treatment, by the way, was approved by 99 U.S. senators in 1991 including Alan Simpson. To begin with, Olbermann dishonestly juxtaposed the two Simpson quotes to make them appear that the second sentence came before the first and therefore was related. This was not the case, as “It’s the kind of thing that’s just driving us to this $1 trillion, 400 billion deficit this year” came at the very end of the AP piece nowhere near the other quote. Nice job, Keith. But most importantly, Olbermann – as he so often does – completely ignored the context of Simpson’s comments. With this in mind, here were some relevant paragraphs from Baker’s piece with emphasis added: The system that automatically awards disability benefits to some veterans because of concerns about Agent Orange seems contrary to efforts to control federal spending, the Republican co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s deficit commission said Tuesday. Former Wyoming Sen. Alan Simpson’s comments came a day after The Associated Press reported that diabetes has become the most frequently compensated ailment among Vietnam veterans, even though decades of research has failed to find more than a possible link between the defoliant Agent Orange and diabetes . For some additional background, this is what Baker and the AP reported Monday: More Vietnam veterans are being compensated for diabetes than for any other malady, including post-traumatic stress disorder, hearing loss or general wounds. Tens of thousands of other claims for common ailments of age, such as erectile dysfunction, are getting paid as well because of a possible link to Agent Orange. The VA said yesterday it will add heart disease, Parkinson’s disease and leukemia to the list of Agent Orange-related conditions. The new rules will go into effect this fall unless Congress intervenes and could cost $42 billion over the next 10 years. As co-chair of the President’s deficit reduction commission, you would imagine that Simpson should be concerned about this change to what the VA is going to be covering especially given the price tag and that there has yet to be a definitive causal relationship made between Agent Orange and diabetes. But Olbermann didn’t share that with his viewers. Here’s what else he conveniently ignored in Tuesday’s AP piece: Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, a Democrat and Vietnam combat veteran, has also raised questions about the spending.   Indeed he did as the Washington Post reported Tuesday: Changes set for publication in Tuesday’s Federal Register could result in payouts of about $42 billion in the next decade, VA said. But the department still could face resistance from lawmakers, including Sen. James Webb (D-Va.), concerned with how the department will pay out claims for ailments that are common among elderly Americans anyway, despite military service. Under the new regulations, the VA will presume that veterans who served in Vietnam between Jan. 9, 1962, and May 7, 1975, were exposed to Agent Orange and will add three medical conditions — hairy cell leukemia, Parkinson’s disease and ischemic heart disease — to its list of disabilities presumed to have a connection to exposure to the herbicide. The changes will go into effect in early November, after a two-month Congressional review period, VA said. The department also plans to review about 90,000 previously denied claims from veterans who had sought benefits for Agent Orange-related health problems. Congress included $13.4 billion for Agent Orange-related benefits in this year’s $58 billion supplemental spending bill. But Webb, a Vietnam veteran, has said that adding ischemic heart disease to the VA’s list of approved diseases could result in the department paying veterans for a disease they might have contracted anyway as they aged. “I take a back seat to no one in my concern for our veterans,” Webb said in May. “I have spent my entire adult life one way or the other involved in veterans law. But I do think we need to have practical, proper procedures, and I do believe that the executive branch . . . needs to be held to an accountable standard.” Not at all surprisingly, Olbermann didn’t mention that Webb, a Democrat as well as a veteran, shared similar budgetary concerns about this VA change with Simpson. That would have been too much like journalism for such a shill. As for that juxtaposed quote, here was the complete context again with emphasis added: The VA also acknowledged in its heart disease rule Tuesday that it could cost billions more than initially anticipated. The initial projection was that the new ailments, mostly heart disease but also Parkinson’s disease and certain types of leukemia, would total $42.2 billion over 10 years. But that was based on disease prevalence rates for the general population, not representative of the aging class of Vietnam veterans . VA used an age-adjusted formula in its latest proposal and estimated that it could cost some $67 billion in the next decade . “It’s the kind of thing that’s just driving us to this $1 trillion, $400 billion deficit this year,” Simpson said. “It’s not that I’m an uncaring person, but common sense is the most uncommon thing in Washington.” As such, in Simpson’s view, “the kind of thing that’s just driving us to this $1 trillion, $400 billion deficit this year” is the faulty accounting the VA used to underestimate by 60 percent the cost of covering these new ailments. He was not as Olbermann stated blaming this on veterans. Frankly, this entire report was utter nonsense, and that a cable news network allows one of its prime time hosts to employ such tactics should be offensive to Americans on both sides of the aisle.

The rest is here:
Olbermann Cherry-picks AP to Accuse Alan Simpson of Being Anti-Veterans

Bill Press: On Election Night Boehner Office Will Be ‘Morgue,’ Pelosi’s A ‘Party’

Gallup might be seeing an historic spread in the Republicans’ favor, and even Mark Halperin is predicting GOP gains of as many as 60 seats. But amidst all the Dem panic and gnashing of teeth, the Pelosi party can still count on one true believer: Bill Press. Former California Dem chairman Press has predicted that when results come in on Election Night, GOP leader John Boehner’s office will be a “morgue,” while Pelosi’s place while Pelosi’s place is “where the party’s going to be.” Press proferred his hyper-optimistic prediction on this evening’s Ed Show, reacting to the report that Ohio talk radio host Bill Cunningham will be broadcasting from Boehner’s office on Election Night.  For good measure, Press—ironically no fan of the First Amendment, apparently—expressed disappointment that it was legal for Cunningham to do so. Let’s make sure Press’s prediction is duly noted.  See you on November 2nd, Bill. ED SCHULTZ: Bill Cunningham, radio talk show host out of Ohio, who’s a severe righty, is saying that he is going to be broadcasting from The Tan Man’s–John Boehner’s–office on Election Night. BILL PRESS: Well first of all, I checked. It is legal , in the House, for members can allow broadcasters to broadcast from their offices, I’m sorry, I’m sorry to say . . . But I’ve got to tell you, Ed, so it’s legal to be there, but if I were Bill Cunningham I’d stay home. Because once the results come in, it’s going to be like a morgue in Boehner’s office. You and I, you and I ought to broadcast, Ed, you and I ought to broadcast from Nancy Pelosi’s balcony.  That’s where the party’s going to be. Check the mirthful reaction of GOP strategist John Feehery. Even Ed had to chuckle at Press’s prediction.  

Read the original post:
Bill Press: On Election Night Boehner Office Will Be ‘Morgue,’ Pelosi’s A ‘Party’

Hardball: Beck’s ‘Bandwagon of Bigotry and Fear’ Kind of Like KKK

On Tuesday, NewsBusters identified the media’s emerging strategy of discrediting Glenn Beck by pitting his religious beliefs against other Christians. Mere hours later, as if on cue, MSNBC was all over it. “Hardball” host Chris Matthews invited on liberal Salon editor Joan Walsh and Democratic strategist Bob Shrum, two people who are something less than experts on the religious right, to help him psychoanalyze conservatives. Their conclusion was all too predictable: Beck’s rhetoric is harmful to Catholics and smacks of anti-Papal Klan rallies. It has now been established by the media that Mormons like Beck are anti-evangelical, anti-Catholic, and possibly just plain anti-Christian. Prepare yourself for liberals who bash conservative Christians at every turn to suddenly care about Christians getting bashed (video below with partial transcript): BOB SHRUM, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Yes, that used to be the rule. But Beck himself clearly is riding a bandwagon of bigotry and fear to gather millions of followers and millions of dollars. He`s made anti-Muslim remarks. He`s made remarks about the president that are certainly tinged with racial overtones. So why wouldn`t he associate with an anti-Catholic? CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: OK, let me get to the roots of this because a lot of this stuff going on on the right has its roots, Joan — and you know, Bob, well — back in the old roots, way back with the “no nothings,” the KKK, the nativists. There`s a smell to this commentary by Hagee, which is anybody that has their religious vaguely from Europe or somewhere else or from Rome, that somehow, it`s bad, it`s un-American. It`s the old nativist cry against the newcomer. But we thought this was sort of dying off somewhere during World War II, when, you know, several million Catholics were fighting the bad guys. We thought this was over with, you and I and Bob. Apparently, it`s still going on with Hagee and his new buddy, Glenn Beck. JOAN WALSH, SALON: Well, you know, I`ve seen this in the mosque debate, as well. We know that, you know, our ancestors, and not very far back, Chris, our very right to participate in public life was questioned because we were supposedly, you know, the subjects of a foreign power, the pope. And so, you know, there`s been a lot of this in right-wing politics for a long time. There have been a lot of battles, and many Catholics have felt, frankly, unwelcome in the Christian right. The other thing, though, that Beck is trying to do here is to unite the Tea Party with the Christian right — MATTHEWS: Right. WALSH: — which has felt a little bit excluded by the Tea Party. If you look at polls, Tea Partiers are less into the Christian right than they are into, say, big business. And it`s been — MATTHEWS: Yes. WALSH: There`s been a little bit of waning of their power, so that`s the other thing that went on on Saturday. It was a dark day when Catholics were discouraged from civil activity because of religious beliefs, and liberals like Walsh will be sure to explain that while attacking civil activists over their religious beliefs. Would that pro-life Catholics were treated with such kid gloves at MSNBC. Or does religious sensitivity only apply to the liberal variety?

Excerpt from:
Hardball: Beck’s ‘Bandwagon of Bigotry and Fear’ Kind of Like KKK

Psycho Talk: Jealous Ed Schultz Claims He Could Easily Rally 300k on National Mall

There’s not really much you can say about this claim, beyond “suuuuure.” Ed Schultz, who attracts just over a quarter of Glenn Beck’s viewership (700,000 vs. 2.6 million viewers), claimed he could out-rally the Fox News host, whose “Restoring Honor” event attracted an estimated 300,000 people to the National Mall on Saturday. “I guarantee you, I could do more than 300,000!” claimed the man who just last week found out he didn’t make the cut for an MSNBC promo. “It ain’t a big deal!” Schultz also claimed that the crowd size at Beck’s rally has absolutely no bearing on Democrats’ prospects in November. Wishful thinking on both counts, it seems. Audio and transcript via Brian Maloney at the Radio Equalizer: Hold it right there! Before we get to her answer, I could get every union head in this country, I could organize every progressive group in this country, the main bloggers. This could be The Ed March. Folks, 300,000 people on the heels of six months’ promotion, that ain’t no big shakes! This is no sign that there’s going to be any big turn of events when it comes to the ballot box and there will be no Democrats in the congress. This is no tea leaf about, “well gosh, they’re coming in November.” Six months’ promotion, NBC News says 300,000 people. I bet I could do that! I bet I could do that with this radio show and my TV show and six months’ production, six months’ promotion, if I had the budget I could equal that march. I know I could! I know I could! I know that I could get Leo Gerard, i could get the Service Employees International Union, I could get AFSCME, I could get all these–I guarantee you, I could do more than 300,000! It ain’t a big deal!

View post:
Psycho Talk: Jealous Ed Schultz Claims He Could Easily Rally 300k on National Mall

Chris Matthews – ‘Obama is Almost Perfect’; Joan Walsh – ‘He’s the American Dream’

Chris Matthews almost got another tingle up his leg on national television Tuesday talking about how wonderful Barack Obama is. So did Salon’s Joan Walsh, In the opening segment of “Hardball,” the host and his perilously liberal guests concluded by trying to figure out why conservatives don’t like the current White House resident. In the end, and sadly predictable, the conclusion was the color of Obama’s skin. But before that, the sycophantic praise and exultation for the object of their affection was literally breathless (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: It’s about being an American, and the wonderful thing about this country is you can grow up to be basically what, you know, it’s a Great Gatbsy country, you can actually create your own identity and become a person. This guy Barack Obama, not to get too basic about it, did everything right. JOAN WALSH, SALON: Yes. MATTHEWS: He studied hard in school. He obeyed the law. He raised a family. He took care of his family. He was an excellent student. He was on the Harvard Law Review. He did everything. He went through the democratic process. He didn’t go out and make a lot of money on Wall Street. He gave himself to his community. This guy is almost pluperfect and they don’t like him. WALSH: He is the American dream. He lived it, he embodies it, and somehow he did something wrong, I don’t know what it is, but it is a little to do with the color of his skin. MATTHEWS: He didn’t show up at Glenn Beck’s House of Love, or whatever it is. BOB SHRUM: They might have made him sit in the back row. Did you hear Matthews almost panting when Walsh called Obama the American dream? Makes you wonder if studio assistants had to come in and give him a sponge-bath during the commercial break.

Go here to read the rest:
Chris Matthews – ‘Obama is Almost Perfect’; Joan Walsh – ‘He’s the American Dream’

Dean: ‘Lost Souls’ Follow ‘Racist Hate-Monger’ Beck

Howard Dean pulled off the rare twin-trashing this morning, dumping on both Glenn Beck and the people who respond to his message.  He began by calling Beck crazy , saying he has “a few things the matter with him up here, up in the head there.” Later, he compounded the calumny, calling Beck a “racist” and a “hate-monger.”  So who were the hundreds of thousands of people who attended the rally and the millions more who watch and listen to Beck?  Why, according to Dean, they’re “lost souls.” New York Times columnist Charles Blow had set the vitriolic tone during the show’s first hour, accusing Beck of “hiding behind a cross” and participating in a “rhetorical assassination” of Pres. Obama. HOWARD DEAN: You know, I think, it was kind of a Tea Party type of event. You know, 300,000 people is a lot of people to have on the Washington Mall, but in terms of who, how many people vote, it’s not a very big crowd.  I don’t know what, I think that Glenn Beck has got a few things the matter with him, up here, up in the head there.  So I just don’t know what to make of it.  I mean, it’s a lot of people. JOE SCARBOROUGH: So, I didn’t know. He’s a doctor.  You’re a psychiatrist. And later . . . DEAN: What I see is, these folks are kind of, and I don’t mean this in a mean kind of way, but they’re a little like lost souls in the sense that they really do, they’re at sea, the country’s changed a lot, they don’t, they’re in the middle of a horrible economic downturn which has probably affected a lot of them personally. So they follow this guy who is like Father Coughlin from the 1930s.  He’s a racist, he’s a hate-monger. And here was Blow earlier . . . WILLIE GEIST: You had a column Saturday about Mr. Beck’s rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on the anniversary of the I Have A Dream speech.  You said it incensed you, you called Beck the anti-King.  Just lay out your criticism of Glenn Beck. CHARLES BLOW: Well Beck is an incredibly divisive figure, and no amount of him wrapping himself in the flag and hiding behind a cross is going to scrub his history of the things he has said and done.  And he is part of what I see as a rhetorical assassination of a good man. Wonder when Charles ripped the Dissent is Patriotic sticker off his bumper?

See original here:
Dean: ‘Lost Souls’ Follow ‘Racist Hate-Monger’ Beck

Matthews and Maddow Bash ‘Racist Tea Party Blogger’ Who Contributes to Democrats and Gay Rights Groups

Those crack researchers at MSNBC have done it again! Last week, hosts Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow both did stories about a blogger whose travel instructions for folks going to Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally got posted at the Maine Tea Party Patriots website. Included were warnings about what stops to avoid on the DC Metro. Predictably, the liberal blogosphere had a field day with this citing it as another “example” of racism within the Tea Party. There’s only one problem: the culprit, a Washington, D.C.-based realtor, is a major contributor to the Democrat Party as well as gay rights groups. But before we get there, here’s what Rachel Maddow reported Monday with the help of the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson (videos follow with transcripts and commentary, h/t Seton Motley): RACHEL MADDOW, HOST: This weekend is the anniversary of “I Have a Dream” speech, one of the most famous speeches, one of the most famous moments in America history. This year, on the 47th anniversary of the speech, a FOX News Channel TV host has decided to use the anniversary as an occasion for a rally of conservatives in Washington at the site of the speech at the Lincoln Memorial. I don`t purport to understand revising civil rights history so people will think conservatives were form civil rights and not against. I do not purport to understand these revisionist efforts. I`m just telling you that`s what they`re doing. But a Tea Party group based in the great state of Maine has put out a guide for any Tea Party minded folks who might be planning on attending the rally in D.C. It`s sort of a tea partiers rough guide “I`m from out of town” guidebook for visiting our nation`s capital — parts of it at least, parts of our nation`s capital, very specific parts of it. Right before they list the exact home addresses for a number of Democratic politicians — nice — they give tea partiers traveling to D.C. for this big rally, they give them some safety advice for how a visiting tea partier protestor should visit our nation`s capital. Quote, “If you are on the subway, stay on the red line between Union Station and Shady Grove, Maryland. If you are on the blue or orange line, do not go past Eastern Market, Capitol Hill, toward the Potomac Avenue stop and beyond. Stay in northwest D.C. and points in Virginia. Do not use the green line or yellow line. These rules are even more important at night.” There is, of course, nothing wrong with many other areas, but you don`t know where you are, so you should not explore them. Do not use the green line or the yellow line. It is dangerous. It is scary. The whole lines. Don`t — don`t — if you`re coaching the turnstile and you feel like — is it nighttime? Yes. Don`t do it! As you can see, the green and yellow lines are two of D.C.`s central metro lines. In fact, you make it harder on yourself if you don`t take those lines, especially if you`re coming in from Maryland or, say, Virginia. I wonder if it`s rough for the people going, say, to the Pentagon, right? Not being able to ride the blue line because the yellow line is so scary. Protecting yourself from the evil green and yellow lines would also protect you, of course, from Howard University, the country`s most prominent historically black college — aahh! Or maybe it`s the U Street stop, the U Street stop where you`ll find Ben`s Chili Bowl, a historic restaurant that attracts luminaries and laymen alike with its sloppy beefy goodness, and at which I gained five pounds in two weeks while once renting an office across the street. Perhaps it`s another attraction only accessible on the yellow and green lines could be the National Archives where the Constitution is? Be afraid, Constitution is there, especially at night. Look at this other map of D.C. Here`s another map of D.C. You see the big rectangular part? If you follow the Tea Party tour guide, you will limit yourself to that little sliver — see that tiny sliver in the middle of it? Little tiny, little thing looks like a flag on its side — that`s it. That`s the part of D.C. you`re advised to segregate yourself within if you are visiting Washington, D.C. for the anniversary of the “I Have a Dream” speech. Joining us now is Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist of “The Washington Post” and MSNBC contributor and D.C. resident Eugene Robinson. Gene, thanks very much for your time. EUGENE ROBINSON, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Good to be here, Rachel. MADDOW: If you avoided all the places in D.C. that the main Tea Party wants you to avoid, what would your experience of Washington, D.C. be like? ROBINSON: It wouldn`t — you wouldn`t see much of the city, obviously. You would — you`d spend a lot of time trying to get to places accessible only on the green and yellow lines by way of the red line, but only the red line to Union Station. So, I don`t know what you`re supposed to do when you get to Union Station. Get on a train and get out of town immediately. Look, this is — this is obviously “scaring white people” part two, and what they have done is essentially try to put off-limits any parts of the city where these main tea partiers believe you might be more likely to encounter, dare I say, black people. MADDOW: What are some of the things that you would miss if you were sincerely going to cut the green and yellow lines out of your life? ROBINSON: Well, let`s see. You couldn`t — you couldn`t go to the D.C. waterfront or the Arena Stage, one of the great theaters in the nation`s capital. If you took seriously their prescription about where to go on the red line, of course, you couldn`t go to Catholic University, to the National Shrine, the grandest Catholic basilica in Washington. You know, I could go on and on. You`d miss the whole U Street scene, which is the most happening nightlife and restaurant scene in town. And, of course, you would miss the newly gentrifying Eighth Street corridor, which is the kind of really hippest, most cutting edge part of town. But you don`t want to see any of that. You want to be afraid and you want to stay in this little — this little kind of safe zone. MADDOW: Well, you can tell my feelings about this by the way I introduced it. I know, rare. But it does seem particularly amazing to me to have this “stay away from all the parts of the city where you might encounter black people” instruction when they are going to a rally that is on the occasion of the 1963 march on Washington and the “I Have a Dream” speech. I have to ask your reaction to the overall setting here, hosting a sort of conservative take back civil rights rally on this occasion. ROBINSON: I have — I have two reactions, I guess, Rachel. Number one, you know, this is being put on by Glenn Beck, who I think his main purpose here is self self-aggrandizement on an almost Napoleonic scale. I mean, and so, I think that`s really a large part of what this is about. Now, a lot of people will come, be like a Tea Party rally, I think, in that there will be some racist elements, there will be some crazies, and there will also be a lot of people who are animated by perhaps a diffused sense of grievance who just happen to have picked the wrong pied piper. And so, those are the people for whom I guess I feel a bit sorry because I think in the end, Glenn Beck is out for himself and they`re going to be kind of left with their grievances unaddressed and feeling worse about the political process and worse about everything than before. MADDOW: And not to mention strict instructions not to visit the Constitution. ROBINSON: They`re not going to have any fun in Washington. Then again, we`ll all be able to eat the Ben`s Chili Bowl because there won`t be any out-of-towners there. So, there will be more for us. (LAUGHTER) MADDOW: You know, Mr. Silver Lining does it again. Well-done, Eugene Robinson. Thanks a lot, Gene. I really appreciate it. ROBINSON: Good to be here, Rachel. MADDOW: Gene, of course, is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for “The Washington Post” and an MSNBC contributor. Yes, he sure is. Too bad neither Rach nor the Pulitzer Prize winner thought to look further into the background of the blogger before making fools of themselves. After all, as the Daily Beast reported Saturday, Bruce Majors throughout his life has almost exclusively contributed to Democrats (h/t Broliath ): According to OpenSecrets.org , he’s donated about $15,000 to Democrats since 2000, including a $10,000 donation to the DNC in 2000, a $500 donation to Howard Dean in 2003, and a $1,000 donation to John Kerry in 2004. His only recent contribution to a Republican candidate was $250 in 2002 to retired Rep. Jim Kolbe, then lone openly gay Republican in Congress.  Being a naturally suspicious sort, I decided to check OpenSecrets.org for myself. Here’s what I found : There could be many Bruce Majors in D.C. How do we know this is the same one? Well, this is what he told the Daily Beast: “I kind of wish I hadn’t given tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats, especially with the real-estate business what it is today,” he said. “Now I can only give a few hundred a year to libertarians to try to make up the balance.”  Majors says he also donated tens of thousands of dollars to the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBT advocacy group, and once won a role as an extra in the sitcom Will & Grace at one of their charity auctions. “I was going to a lot of lesbian cocktail parties raising money for Gore and then Kerry/Edwards,” he said. “I’m sure they’re all horrified this week.” With this in mind, do you think Maddow and Robinson would have been yucking it up at Majors’ expense if they knew he was such a large contributor to Democrats as well as LGBT causes? But the fun doesn’t end there, for on Tuesday, Chris Matthews covered the story with the Chicago Tribune’s Clarence Page: CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Ahead of Glenn Beck`s rally this Saturday on the Lincoln Memorial, Tea Party activist Bruce Majors posted online a primer on how out-of-towners should navigate D.C. during that event. The guide was then circulated through a main Tea Party site. In this section of this blog, or whatever, entitled “Safety and Mores,” Major`s first sentence reads, quote, “D.C.`s population includes refugees from every country. Most taxi driver and many waiters, waitresses especially in local coffee shops, like the Bread and Chocolate chain, are immigrants. Frequently from east Africa or Arab countries. As a rule, African immigrants do not like for you to assume they are African- Americans, and especially do not like for you to guess they are from a neighboring country, for example, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia.” Joining me to discuss the Tea Party guide to the capital, fellow D.C. resident, Clarence Page. You know, this is — I don`t know, I`m going to laugh, because it`s absurdity. CLARENCE PAGE, THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: This is absurd. MATTHEWS: But this is telling white folk how to get through an ethnically diverse town with a lot of African-Americans, which has been African-American in its majority I think since the Civil War. You know, I`ve lived there since I got out of the Peace Corps. These people need a special guide. It`s a regular big city, folks. Your thoughts? PAGE: I thought this was a satire, at first, though. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: It looks like a liberal satire or stereotyped view of what Tea Party people think. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: But it`s — it`s essentially a guide for — this is the sort of thing you hear from every small town person who is afraid of big cities. MATTHEWS: Yes. PAGE: Coming from a small town, I can say this. I grew up in John Boehner`s district, as you know. MATTHEWS: Right. PAGE: Middletown, Ohio. And I want to tell you, we`re not all hicks out there, Chris, but — (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Use your common sense when you come to a big city. But here he is, here`s Majors, also outlined — he outlined that areas of this city we`re in right now to avoid certain metro rail lines that means subway lines and neighborhoods far from the Capitol and the National Mall. D.C. blog took Major`s restrictions and blog. Look how they showed it. They took it. Look at the map. They Googled the map and shown it. See the little blue area? That`s the only place in Washington, according to this blogger, it`s safe to go in Washington. I got to tell you. It`s an awful boring trip if you only do the — that`s basically the Washington Mall from what I can tell. PAGE: There`s also your neighborhood, in the pink zone, I believe. MATTHEWS: No. I`m up in the far northwest up there. But anyway. PAGE: Look how absurd this, though. I mean, the normal street life in D.C. is, you know, stay to the west of the park — MATTHEWS: Right. PAGE: — or Rock Creek Park. Now, east of the park has gotten largely gentrified. This city defies `60s stereotypes from the old Clint Eastwood movies. But this is still Dirty Harry city. (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: You and I know that the zestiest part of the town are the areas that are most mixed — PAGE: Oh, yes. MATTHEWS: — edgy, the most fun for young people. All the young people now live on 14th Street. PAGE: And he does give props to Silver Springs and some other nice suburbs and some neighborhoods (INAUDIBLE) Capitol Hill. Delicious. For the record, these weren’t the only mainstream media figures to take the bait. The Associated Press did a number of articles about Majors as well. Would he have gotten any attention if they would have known he’s lived in D.C. for thirty years and given so much money to liberals? Yes, that’s a rhetorical question.

Follow this link:
Matthews and Maddow Bash ‘Racist Tea Party Blogger’ Who Contributes to Democrats and Gay Rights Groups

Chris Matthews’ ‘Nightmare’: ‘Right-wing Boys and Girls Singing Praise for Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin’

The hatred for Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and Americans that don’t agree with the current direction of this nation was dripping from Chris Matthews’ lips Friday evening. In a show filled with falsehoods and anti-Conservative rants that should even embarrass folks at MSNBC, the “Hardball” host concluded by once again attacking one of the most popular radio and television personalities in the country along with the former governor of Alaska. Of the “Restoring Honor” rally to be held in Washington, D.C., Saturday, Matthews asked, “Can we imagine if [Martin Luther] King were physically here tomorrow, today, were he to reappear tomorrow on the very steps of the Lincoln Memorial?” The MSNBCer disgustingly answered his own question, “I have a nightmare that one day a right-wing talk show host will come to this spot, his people`s lips dripping with the words ‘interposition’ and ‘nullification.'” Matthews continued practically seething venom, “Little right-wing boys and little right-wing girls joining hands and singing their praise for Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin. I have a nightmare” (video follows with transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Let me finish tonight with those few lines from the Martin Luther King speech of 1963. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., CIVIL RIGHTS ICON: But not only that, let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: Dr. King was talking about the founding place of the KKK, Stone Mountain. The site of the Scottsboro Boys trial — Lookout Mountain. This was 1963, never forget. The civil rights bill was a year away. Lunch counters and gas station restrooms were still for whites only, so were hotels and restaurants throughout the South. I remember myself seeing those white-only signs along the highway heading south during a spring break. I remember seeing one still there when I went to rural Louisiana to train for the Peace Corps. There was a hard divide in this country back then. On one side stood the people who believed in the power of the federal government to do the right thing, especially when state governments, local governments and local businesses persisted in doing the wrong thing or doing nothing. It was the time when governors like Ross Barnett of Mississippi and George Wallace of Alabama stood up to keep their universities white only. A time when people used terms like “nullification” and “interposition,” who claimed the right to obstruct the federal government, to act even when Congress passed a law. Today, we hear the echoes of those voices, people calling for nullification. Even secession gets a call from those who just don`t like the federal government and certainly don`t like the man leading it. Tomorrow, those who thrill to such words are heading here to Washington. They`re heading directly to the Lincoln Memorial, site of the Martin Luther King speech. The main speaker is the man who said this about this country`s first African-American president. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) GLENN BECK, FOX NEWS HOST: This guy is, I believe, a racist. Look at the way — look at — look at the things that he has been surrounded by. (END VIDEO CLIP) MATTHEWS: That is the man who comes to Lincoln`s feet to claim the mantle of Martin Luther King. Can we imagine if King were physically here tomorrow, today, were he to reappear tomorrow on the very steps of the Lincoln Memorial? I have a nightmare that one day a right wing talk show host will come to this spot, his people`s lips dripping with the words “interposition” and “nullification.” Little right wing boys and little right wing girls joining hands and singing their praise for Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin. I have a nightmare. Many talked today about a religious center near Ground Zero being a desecration. What do you call this? Actually, the real desecration is what Matthews and his co-conspirators at MSNBC are doing to journalism. Offering opinions about political figures and competitors on rival networks is one thing, but this constant invective aimed at Republicans and Fox News personalities coming from Matthews and virtually all the on air talent at MSNBC is getting totally out of control. What Matthews did Friday evening isn’t much different than what NewsBusters reported is now regularly being spewed by liberal radio talk show hosts. Does MSNBC really want its programming to be at the same level as the hatred being uttered by the likes of Mike Malloy, Stephanie Miller, Randi Rhodes, Ron Reagan, Jr., and Montel Williams? As Ed Schultz is now a part of MSNBC’s prime time lineup, and is a regular emitter of some of the most vile rhetoric on the radio today, maybe the answer is “Yes.” Journalism be damned, I guess.

Read the rest here:
Chris Matthews’ ‘Nightmare’: ‘Right-wing Boys and Girls Singing Praise for Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin’

Hannity, Bozell Take On MSM Ground Zero Mosque Bias on ‘Media Mash’

“This is one of those ever more obnoxious teaching moments that we’re getting from the left-wing press,” NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell complained on last night’s “Hannity” after watching a clip of MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell lament that Americans need to be more sensitive to minorities, not for the “burden” to be on Imam Feisal Rauf to assauge concerns about the planned Ground Zero mosque. Noting that polls show 70 percent of the American people oppose the Park 51 project planned just two blocks from Ground Zero, Bozell argued Mitchell’s complaint is just more evidence of the liberal media’s “worldview that is completely contrary” and out-of-touch with the American public. Besides Ground Zero mosque bias, The Media Research Center founder also reacted to NBC’s Chuck Todd passing along an unnamed “observer” who told him the 2010 midterms would be the “fear” election in contrast to the 2008 “hope” election: If you go back to every presidential campaign, it’s always fear against hope [in the media’s eyes]….And in the off-year election, it’s the same thing. Look at ’94. It was all about fear. It was all about fear and hatred on the Republican side, and about hope and change on the Democratic side. It’s always this [in the media’s mind]. So this is the pattern. And then he says sources tell him, look, this is the watercooler talking at MSNBC.  To watch the full segment, click the play button in the embed above at right, or click here to download the WMV video file. To listen to the segment, click here to download the MP3 audio file.

Originally posted here:
Hannity, Bozell Take On MSM Ground Zero Mosque Bias on ‘Media Mash’

Ed Schultz’s MSNBC Rampage: ‘I’m Going to Torch This F*cking Place’ [Cable News]

Unwatchable MSNBC host Ed Schultz apparently wasn’t so happy about being omitted from the network’s recent election night promos. Two weeks ago, Page Six reports, he went nuts in MSNBC’s New York offices, screaming obscenities at everyone. More