Tag Archives: Obama

Obama’s Leadership Deficit

Editor’s Note : The following originally appeared at Andrew Breitbart’s Big Hollywood . Appearing on CNN with Anderson Cooper, film director Spike Lee implored President Obama to infuse his handling of the Gulf oil spill with more emotion. Demonstrating the astute analysis we have come to expect from the director, Lee implored Obama to “one time, go off.” Perhaps he is of the same mind as Bill Maher, that the authentic black man is one who is always armed and resorts to violence and loud-talking when things do not go his way. (Note to self: On the way home from the liquor store, I must pick up my Glock from the gun shop.) Both Lee and Maher seem to share the opinion of a great many progressives that emotion is the same as leadership and that problems are most easily solved by decree. It is no mistake that following criticism by Lee and others, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was declaring to the media that he had “seen rage from him [President Obama].” Apparently, when Obama gets angry, he clinches his jaw. Soon after the Gibbs press conference, the President showed up in Louisiana, walked the beach in shirt sleeves and then, with clenched jaw, he spoke of growing up in a culture where the water was sacred. The administration meant this to be a demonstration of leadership. However, in some quarters, this is also known as street theatre. Still seeking to enhance his “street cred,” the president then appeared on morning television, lowered his pants down below his buttocks, flashed his gold teeth, and announced that he was looking for some tail to kick. In the meantime, the oil continues to gush from the well and the resulting slick is now the size of a small state. As it turns out, sending the attorney general to Louisiana and ordering BP to “plug the damn hole” and then “going off” on national television didn’t solve the problem. If the poll numbers are to be believed, it would also appear that Americans are not impressed with how much booty a president can kick, especially if it is not accompanied by decisive action, which actually addresses the problem. Over the course of the last two months, the president has had several opportunities to take bold and determined action–to be a leader. He has dithered instead. A few of the missed opportunities: Fire-booms that were supposed to be a part of any oil-spill response were missing in action. When they were finally located there were too few to do much good. In the event of a major spill, federal responders had pre-approval to begin burning oil. They waited more than a week before doing a test-burn and then stopped. Experts have suggested that had the burning begun right away, 90% of the oil could have been burned away before it spread. Thirteen countries have offered the United States the advantage of their technical skills. To date, the Obama administration has declined to take advantage of all of this experience and expertise. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers delayed the building of protective sand-berms until they could study the issue. The administration finally approved six berms, but only agreed to pay for one of them. Government officials say they want to first see if they work. Of course, by that time building more berms won’t do any good. Two months into the crisis, Admiral Thad Allen, the U.S. official in charge of the Gulf of Mexico crisis, (or is he?), is still talking about asking Congress for a waiver of the Jones Act, which would allow foreign vessels involved in the crisis to operate in American waters. However, that may not do much good. Louisiana boat owners who have volunteered to aid in clean-up efforts are complaining that bureaucratic red-tape is keeping them out of the water. On a positive note, the president did create another government commission. Leadership of the statesman variety–as opposed to the shirtsleeves and furrowed-brow-look-of-concern variety–would have the president with a large pair of scissors cutting through the red tape. A leader scours the private sector for the most knowledgeable folks he can find and asks for their help. He gets on the phone with our allies and says, “Yes! Please send me your experts!” He says to the governors of the Gulf States, “Tell me what you need.” Leadership is putting aside political agendas and mobilizing the power of the executive office in order to solve an immediate crisis. Leadership doesn’t always need big speeches or street corner bravado. Leadership can be quiet; it can be cool and determined. But if it isn’t focused and it isn’t active, it ain’t worth the price of admission to a “Spike Lee Joint.”

Link:
Obama’s Leadership Deficit

Quote of the Day: David Frum on How To Get Off Oil

Remember $4.00 gas? How it killed the Hummer and changed habits? Conservative columnist David Frum does, as he hits TreeHugger two days in a row for being….sensible. No wonder he got fired from the American Enterprise Institute. He writes in CNN.com about the tough but necessary slog to get off oil: President Obama is right: We can take the U.S. off oil. But he omitted to mention the fine print: Doing … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Visit link:
Quote of the Day: David Frum on How To Get Off Oil

Should the federal government sue Arizona over the state’s new immigration law? Why or why not?

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently in an interview that the Obama Administration's Justice Department would sue the state of Arizona over their controversial new immigration legislation. They're expected to bring a suit in the next few days to prevent the law from going into effect July 29. What do you think? Should the federal government stay out of Arizona's business? Or is this law so abhorrent that it requires federal intervention? http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20008151-503544.html added by: afitzgerald

Christian right attacks President Obama for recognizing gay dads on Father’s Day

President Barack Obama is under attack by the Christian right for recognizing gay dads in his Father's Day address. Obama's simple Father's Day message is as positive and family friendly as one might imagine. It is hard to believe anyone taking issue with such a universal theme as fatherhood. However, apparently one line in President Obama's Father's Day speech has caused a firestorm in the Christian fundamentalist community: “Nurturing families come in many forms, and children may be raised by a father and mother, a single father, two fathers, a step father, a grandfather, or caring guardian.” Was Obama wrong to mention gay dads in his Father's Day address? http://www.examiner.com/x-10853-Portland-Humanist-Examiner~y2010m6d21-Christian-… added by: unimatrix0

Rush Limbaugh Bashes GOP for not standing behind Barton

(CNN) – Conservative talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh is taking aim at Republican leaders for rushing to demand Texas Rep. Joe Barton retract his controversial apology to BP CEO Tony Hayward during last week's congressional hearing. On his radio show Monday, Limbaugh suggested the GOP leadership likely agrees with Barton's sentiments, but are driven by recent national polls which suggest the majority of Americans support President Barack Obama's push for BP to set aside $20 billion for future liability claims. “It was a shakedown pure and simple,” said Limbaugh, echoing the words for which Barton later apologized. “And somebody had the audacity to call it what it was and now everybody's running for the hills.” “All you have to do is look at the polling,” Limbaugh continued. “We're talking about Republicans inside the beltway. All you have to do is look at the polling data and media coverage and find out what they are going to do.” Barton, the ranking Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, quickly faced fire from both the right and the left after apologizing to Hayward during the BP chairman's appearance before his committee Thursday. Hours later – amid threats he would lose his leadership post – Barton retracted the comments. “Let's just slither away under the rock here,” Limbaugh said, mocking the Republicans' approach to Barton. “We'll let Joe Barton get eaten by the Democrat lizards on this to protect ourselves. This is politics and this is the reason why true believers have such a problem with politics. It's just that simple and no more complicated than that.” added by: TimALoftis

While Networks Ignore Obama Golf Outing, CNN Humorist Gets Story Right

CNN correspondent Jeanne Moos has a penchant for quirky, off-beat reporting, but what happens when the eccentric newswoman gives a more accurate picture of important events than the serious journalists? While media outlets relentlessly denounced BP CEO Tony Hayward for taking Saturday off to participate in a yacht race, they mostly glossed over or completely ignored President Barack Obama’s Saturday golf outing with Vice President Joe Biden. It was left to CNN’s resident humorist to connect the dots. “It’s the yachting versus golf smack down, round one,” declared Moos. “BP’s CEO gets pummeled for taking a day off to watch his yacht race…CBS White House correspondent Mark Knoller says already President Obama has played 39 rounds of golf, compared to the 24 George Bush played his entire presidency.” Moos’s evenhanded coverage of Obama’s and Hayward’s weekend misadventures contrasted markedly with reports filed by network news correspondents. ABC’s Sharyn Alfonsi covered the outrage surrounding Hayward’s yachting, but ignored criticism of Obama’s golfing. CBS anchor Charles Osgood parroted White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel’s derision of Hayward, but failed to present an Obama critic. The grown-up journalists might have selfishly ignored Obama’s 39th round of golf since taking office, but as Moos reported, at least the children shared both sides of the story. “My mom doesn’t take breaks like every two months,” proclaimed one child. “You don’t really need to take a break every two months to go see a yacht race.” “President Obama? I’m not sure he should actually be golfing right now,” argued another. The transcript of the segment can be found below: CNN American Morning 6/22/10 6:54 a.m. KIRAN CHETRY, co-host: 54 Minutes past the hour. Time now for the most news in the morning with Jeanne. BP’s CEO did manage to find cleaner waters over the weekend and many said it was a major PR fail for the company. JOHN ROBERTS, co-host: But many critics are saying that the president can’t say anything about it until he puts down the golf clubs. Here’s Jeanne. JEANNE MOOS, CNN correspondent: It’s the yachting versus golf smack down, round one. BP’s CEO gets pummeled for taking a day off to watch his yacht race. JOY BEHAR, co-host of “The View”: How dare he just take off. Sen. RICHARD SHELBY (R-Ala): The height of stupidity. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: How do you spell fool? MOOS: But before you could spell it – BP’s CEO – President Obama’s golfing came under attack. DANA PERINO, former George W. Bush press secretary: Almost five hours on the golf course with Biden. ELIZABETH HASSELBECK, co-host of “The View”: And it shouldn’t have been eight times between the spill and now. MOOS: Actually, seven times. CBS White House correspondent Mark Knoller says already President Obama has played 39 rounds of golf, compared to the 24 George Bush played his entire presidency, including some that got into a Michael Moore film. Former President GEORGE W. BUSH: Stop these terrorist killers. Thank you. Now watch this drive. MOOS: And while some equate president Obama’s golf to Tony Hayward’s yachting – two different men, two different jobs, one management style – the president’s defenders note a big difference. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: That’s the thing, he didn’t create that mess that is there. What do they want the man to do? Put a wetsuit on and go down and fix that pipe? MOOS: Meanwhile, Politico pondered the really important question, why is Tony Hayward’s yacht names “Bob”? Wondering if it has anything to do with the Bill Murray movie, “What About Bob?” Sailor so scared he has to be lashed to the mast. Now Tony Hayward is being lashed. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I really think it was a disgrace. MOOS: On the other hand, surprisingly it was the first day off he’s had in two months. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: I really don’t care. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Too bad. Look what he did. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Every day of his life is a day off. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: I think he’s probably due for a little down time. MOOS: But downtime on the water can be a downer. Remember when presidential candidate John Kerry went wind surfing and it ended up in an attack ad. ANNOUNCER: Whichever way the wind blows. MOOS: BP’s CEO is being mocked in an animation by a Taiwanese tabloid website. He sits on the beach sending out a drink to a guy drowning in oil, from the mouths of babes. UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: My mom doesn’t take breaks like every two months. You don’t really need to take a break every two months to go see a yacht race. UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: In the two hours it takes to golf or to go yachting, another 1,000 to 10,000 tons of oil could leak out. UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: President Obama? I’m not sure he should actually be golfing right now. MOOS: Just plug the darn hole, Mr. president. Jeanne Moos, CNN, New York. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

See the article here:
While Networks Ignore Obama Golf Outing, CNN Humorist Gets Story Right

After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Keith Olbermann just couldn’t stay mad at the radical leftists at the Daily Kos. Six days after walking away in a huff, the MSNBC host returned to his spot on the blog on Tuesday morning, with the headline “So, uh, this looks like a nice site.” He began: “OK, I’m back.” I’ve always liked to invent backstories behind cliches and one of my oldest ones is the idea that the first guy who said “You can’t see the forest for the trees” was actually running through a forest when he ran head first into a tree and didn’t enjoy the experience. You do tend to swear at the trees, and, if you hit your head hard enough, you might even swear off that particular forest for awhile. Olbermann claimed to be delighted that responses to his “I’m out of here” blog entry brought a wide spectrum of opinion, and that perhaps he had a new thought buried beneath his self-admitted daily pomposity:  It occurs to me, in the full flower of the pomposity that always strikes me at midday, that this might be somewhat metaphorical for progressives and other centrists, particularly relative to criticism of the Administration. I was reminded of this last night when somebody asked me why I wasn’t pounding the President more on Afghanistan, and I linked him the Comment I did last year saying Obama should declare victory and go home. “Sure,” the guy replied, “you’ve been critical of that, once, but you seem to go lightly on them.” And I said, you’re right…other than this stuff about the BP disaster, and the Public Option, and the political strategy on Health Care Reform, and Afghanistan, and not prosecuting torture, and the Kagan nomination, and maybe six dozen complaints about process or tone. I mention this because the last diary was misinterpreted by 99% of the old media and 99.5% of the new media. I didn’t ‘quit Daily Kos because I got criticized for criticizing POTUS.’ I wrote what I wrote because there was a body of us here which assumed any criticism of this administration had to originate in a nefarious and wholly nugatory plan to destroy it. There certainly are such nefarious and wholly nugatory plans, active, this very minute: The most prominent is called the Republican Party (GOBP). Meanwhile, one group of progressives/liberals/Democrats has assumed no such conspiracy theory, demanded no purity test, and taken no instant and farfetched umbrage. These are the individuals known as the Obama Administration. I haven’t been in contact with anybody there since my comments on the President’s speech, but I sure as hell was in contact with them after every single one of the criticisms I mentioned above. Nobody ever called me up to complain. Nobody ever called me up to dissuade. Nobody schmoozed me, and nobody threatened me. They seem to assume it comes with the job. And they correctly assume that if I’m critical of them, they’re entitled to be critical of my criticism. This differs from the previous occupants of the White House in more ways than this site has members and lurkers and trolls combined. You will recall that every criticism of Bush was a plot to destroy America. Criticism of Obama is…democracy. That’s funny. Keith usually suggests criticism of Obama is….racist. Olbermann apologized for his wounded ago, even as he’s accustomed to dishing it out at least as viciously as he takes it:  The show I do and the positions I take are under assault, every day, from every possible direction, and I’m not complaining about it: I can afford the suit of armor. I just get pissed off now and again when I’m busy dodging bazookas and somebody bounces a nine-volt battery off my shiny metal ass claiming I’m actually an agent trying to make dough the easy way. I should have laughed at the ludicrousness of the idea. I didn’t. Sometimes it gets sweaty inside the armor. I’m not given to rash decisions (and when I say “I’m not,” of course I mean, “I am.”)

Go here to read the rest:
After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

It’s one thing for media liberals to suggest the Tea Party is on the fringe of the right, but when it’s another when they starting putting Ronald Reagan in the center by comparison (even as Governor of California). On The Rachel Maddow Show on Tuesday, Matthews suggested that somehow America is reliably centrist, so even Reagan moved to moderation (and there’s no mention of Obama’s left-wing surge): But the American people have sort of a gyroscope, something that always brings them back to center, where it very much — and nobody wants to hear this on the right, but we’re very much like France in that way. We`re not an ideologically proletarian country or right-wing militarist country. Generally, we listen to those voices and we never go further right than Reagan, and the minute he got into office, he moved very much to the center. As governor of California, for example, on issues like abortion rights. He moved to the center. I don’t think we are an extremist country, but these voices are frightening. And at a time of economic desperation, if you will, they’re being listened to. But the one ironic — I don’t want to call it silver lining – the one whisper of possible good coming out of this horror in the Gulf of Mexico, what is really hurting North America, the love we have for this part of the world, our own part of the world, is that maybe it convinces people that government is important. Matthews smeared the Tea Party together with every fringy right-wing cause in American history: MATTHEWS: You hear it from the tea party people. You see them with the Gadsden flag, “Don`t tread on me.” You hear it from the militia, from the birthers, from the patriot groups, the oath takers — the oath keepers. They all have one resonant statement. `The United States has been taken over by a foreign power. There’s a tyranny in Washington. It`s illegitimate. It’s led by a person who`s not an American. He may be a Muslim. He may be a Nazi.’ whatever. It’s not America. Anything goes. And by the way, when you resort to the Second Amendment to take out your government officials, can you go any further than that? I wonder. MADDOW: You know, seeing the way that you juxtaposed that historical clip that we just played with, for example, the birthers, and when you draw those connections with them all thinking there`s some foreign and illegitimate power that needs to be – that`s usurping legitimate American authority, it just reminds me that there’s a lot to the ‘Communists in the State Department’ stuff that sounds like the Kenyan in the White House stuff. Isn`t it sort of, can it be the same hot buttons for Americans, can they work? MATTHEWS: No, of course, it’s there. It’s the paranoid history of America. I always like to tell this to people who care about America, like your audience. There`s two armies that march almost side by side through American history. There’s the progressive army that led for abolition, that fought the Civil War, the good guys of the Civil War. And of course, those who really pushed for reconstruction afterwards like Thaddeus Stevens and the good guys, the radical Republicans of that day. And alongside is this other army, the know-nothings and then the Klansmen who came along later. And then, you`ve got in the 20th century – it’s the same pattern – it’s the progressives moving a step or two ahead of this reactionary army that rides right along them, sort of camp followers playing off the dispossessed, those who resent change. It’s same with sexual orientation today. There`s always going to be another group growing along saying this threatens traditional marriage. This threatens something here. Matthews talk of the centrist “gyroscope” came right after more of his optimistic preaching about how Democrats will pull out some of these congressional races: I think Charlie Crist, having been pushed out of the Republican Party in Florida basically for hugging Barack Obama – let’s face it – might well win down there. I think he will. I think Marco Rubio is going to fade as a candidate. I think Sharron Angle, with the statements coming out now about using the Second Amendment right, which is a right in the Constitution. It`s written there, as a way of taking on your government and bringing it down. I think that`s going to scare you. Nevada is not a right wing state. Nevada is kind of a purple state. I think Harry Reid is now back in the saddle. So I think Joe Sestak is going to win. I don’t think Pat Toomey is consistent with Pennsylvania sort of center right and center left history. So we`ll see. …I think Rand Paul could lose. But we’ll have to see. I don’t know. I think this is a bad year for progressives. It`s a tough economy, and you’re always blamed if you’re in power.

See the original post here:
Chris Matthews Suggested Tea Parties Are Unlike Reagan — Who Moved to the Center?

ABC’s Tapper: A ‘Good Week’ for White House After ‘Gift’ From Joe Barton

On Friday’s Good Morning America on ABC, White House correspondent Jake Tapper described  White House reaction to Republican Congressman Joe Barton calling BP’s $20 billion escrow fund the result of a government “shakedown”: “…the argument they’re making, that the Republican Party is too close to corporate America…..And they’ve been given this great foil by Joe Barton.” When co-host George Stephanopoulos wondered if the Obama administration was at all concerned about being seen as anti-business, Tapper recited the White House spin: “…they say, at the end of the day, there were inequities throughout the Bush years and they need to correct those inequities. It was the wild west. And they’d rather be on their side, taking on corporate America, than on the Republican side, in their view, defending it.” Later, Tapper concluded: “…they think it was a good week. The President’s trip down to the Gulf, the speech, the $20 billion escrow fund and then this gift from Joe Barton ….they feel like they had a good week. Perhaps their first good week since this crisis began.” At the top of the show, co-host Robin Roberts described the “political firestorm” surrounding BP CEO Tony Hayward’s Thursday testimony on Capitol Hill and Barton’s comments. Later, Stephanopoulos argued that the “beating” Hayward got by members of Congress was “overwhelmed” by Barton. In a report that followed, correspondent Jonathan Karl declared: “Hayward did find one friend on Capitol Hill, Republican Joe Barton.” Turning to Tapper, Stephanopoulos began by noting how Democrats “pounced” on Barton. Tapper quoted a tweet from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs: “He said, ‘Who would the GOP put in charge of overseeing the energy industry and big oil if they won control of Congress? Yup. You guessed it, Joe Barton.'” Here is a full transcript of the June 18 Stephanopoulos and Tapper exchange: 7:08AM ET GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s go to Jake Tapper at the White House. And Jake, they just pounced yesterday when they heard that apology. JAKE TAPPER: That’s exactly right. Vice President Biden made comments. And then take a look at this tweet from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. He said, ‘Who would the GOP put in charge of overseeing the energy industry and big oil if they won control of Congress? Yup. You guessed it, Joe Barton.’ And that’s the argument they’re making, that the Republican Party is too close to corporate America, corporations throughout the world, like BP. And they’ve been given this great foil by Joe Barton. STEPHANOPOULOS: Are they concerned at all about the argument that the White House is overstepping its bounds? That the President is just viscerally anti-business, which you’ve heard from many Republicans. TAPPER: Well, a senior White House official I spoke to said that they – they’re careful to walk the line and not be anti-business, they invite businesses to be part of discussions. But they say, at the end of the day, there were inequities throughout the Bush years and they need to correct those inequities. It was the wild west. And they’d rather be on their side, taking on corporate America, than on the Republican side, in their view, defending it. STEPHANOPOULOS: And, Jake, how about the Left? You know, I think the White House was hoping – they kept calling the speech the President gave on Tuesday night an ‘inflection point,’ that it would be a turning point for the President. Yet, they were met by a chorus of criticism, not only by – from conservatives, but also liberals. Concerned by that at all? TAPPER: They are concerned by that. But they think it was a good week. The President’s trip down to the Gulf, the speech, the $20 billion escrow fund and then this gift from Joe Barton, which has really been a lightning rod for the Left, far more than the White House. So I think they feel like they had a good week. Perhaps their first good week since this crisis began. STEPHANOPOULOS: You’re going to have a chance to put a lot of these questions in a big exclusive on Sunday. TAPPER: That’s right, we have an exclusive with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. So we’ll talk to him on Sunday. And then we’ve got a great roundtable, as well, George. STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, Jake, we’re looking forward to that.

Continue reading here:
ABC’s Tapper: A ‘Good Week’ for White House After ‘Gift’ From Joe Barton

Catching Heat From Left, Obama Meets With Liberal Commentators to Discuss Gulf Spill

President Obama met with a group of prominent liberal commentators on Thursday to discuss the Gulf oil spill and the administration’s response. The meeting came in the midst of a rare firestorm of criticism from the left over the president’s response to the spill. It was surely not coincidence that the journalists seen leaving the White House that afternoon–the New York Times’s Gail Collins , the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson , MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow , and the Wall Street Journal’s Gerald Seib –were some of the more prominent critics of the president’s Oval Office address on Tuesday. The meeting demonstrates two facts: the White House is trying furiously to spin media coverage of the federal response to the spill in the administration’s favor, and the old White House double standard towards the news media persists. Though hardly shocking, the Obama administration continues to employ a vicious double standard that dubs any news organization that criticizes the president something short of legitimate. Lest anyone has forgotten, two top White House officials–chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and political advisor David Axelrod –both rhetorically negated Fox’s credentials as a legitimate news organization. Thursday’s meeting suggests another layer of partisanship that, though hardly surprising, is still quite telling. While Fox is demonized, some of the left’s most partisan commentators are not only granted the White House’s seal of legitimacy, but are even give privileged access to the president. The meeting also suggests that Obama is devoting more effort to spinning his administration’s policies concerning the gulf spill than he is with actually devising more effective policies. His meeting with these lefty journalists was, after all, roughly three times as long as his meeting with BP CEO Tony Hayward.

Read the original post:
Catching Heat From Left, Obama Meets With Liberal Commentators to Discuss Gulf Spill