Tag Archives: photographers

Tamar Braxton Is Pissed Over Backlash From ‘Hot Sugar’ Video

Here is the original post:

  Singer Tamar Braxton just knew she was going to have the hottest video on the internet when she dropped the visuals for the fan…

Tamar Braxton Is Pissed Over Backlash From ‘Hot Sugar’ Video

FFNIMAGE51032801FFNSET60061230Semi-Exclusive 51032801 Good morning Mr Grumpypants An angry Justin Bieber has to be quotrestrainedquot by his body guard to keep him from attacking the photographers waiting outside his hotel this morni

FFNIMAGE51032801FFNSET60061230Semi-Exclusive 51032801 Good morning Mr Grumpypants An angry Justin Bieber has to be quotrestrainedquot by his body guard to keep him from attacking the photographers waiting outside his hotel this morni – 485995_166026770220056_1706160289_n.jpg Link: FFNIMAGE51032801FFNSET60061230Semi-Exclusive 51032801 Good morning Mr Grumpypants An angry Justin Bieber has to be quotrestrainedquot by his body guard to keep him from attacking the photographers waiting outside his hotel this morni

Excerpt from:
FFNIMAGE51032801FFNSET60061230Semi-Exclusive 51032801 Good morning Mr Grumpypants An angry Justin Bieber has to be quotrestrainedquot by his body guard to keep him from attacking the photographers waiting outside his hotel this morni

Chris Brown Spray Paints Mural: Check it Out!

Chris Brown is an artiste, and not just in the recording studio. In addition to being a Grammy winner, he’s also a painter ! Armed with cans of spray paint, the R&B star absolutely went to town on the side of a building in Miami – with permission of course – and it was awesome. Photographers snapped pictures as Brown tagged the wall, and we have to say, the man’s got some serious skills when it comes to art as well as music. Check out the finished product after the jump:

See the original post here:
Chris Brown Spray Paints Mural: Check it Out!

Very Rich Beyotches: NeNe Leakes, Geritol Greg, Son, And Little Dog Spotted Poppin Tags At Barney’s In Beverly Hills [Photos]

Awwwwww, isht! Looks like Geritol Greg has made his way to LA to shop it up with NeNe Leakes and their son Brentt and a little dog, too. Peep more pics of the family below: GSI Media

Go here to see the original:
Very Rich Beyotches: NeNe Leakes, Geritol Greg, Son, And Little Dog Spotted Poppin Tags At Barney’s In Beverly Hills [Photos]

Judith Godreche topless

We think its fair to see that once you have seen one pair of breast you’ve seen them all is not true. Judith Godreche’s breasts have a rare character of their own, pert and aroused. They look big enough to put your hands around with some spare but they seem to defy physics. Continue reading

Kym Marsh see-through

Kym Marsh is a British chick that is never afraid to show herself off to the paparazzi and here she is again smiling for the photographers while wearing a see-through outfit for the camera’s Continue reading

Cintia Dicker Titties for Status Magazine July 2012 of the Day

Cintia Dicker is a hot Brazilian model who is probably rocking a set of fake tits and that is why she doesn’t mind showing them off for the photographers, or maybe she doesn’t mind showing off her tits cuz she’s a models, and that’s what models do in order to get paid, and get out of Brazil so that they can live the American Dream by marrying billionaires….who knows…I just know I’ve never banged a redhead, they used to disgust me and now I want one…. and she’s the trophy redhead and that makes these pics of her all the more special for me….Keep up the good work you hot little slut.

See the original post:
Cintia Dicker Titties for Status Magazine July 2012 of the Day

Kick-Ass Sequel ‘Keeps Standard’ of the First: Aaron Johnson

The Kick-Ass sequel was a forgone conclusion but speculation mounted on when it would occur and if its stars including Aaron Johnson would take part. But all turned out fine and Jeff Wadlow will direct from his script, a follow up to the original that debuted at SXSW back in 2010 that went on to gross $103M at the box office worldwide. That’s a lot of ass-kicking! Star Aaron Johnson told Collider that he’s seen the script and it shouldn’t disappoint. “It’s pretty much set to go this fall,” he said. “I think now [Chloe Grace Moretz] and [Christopher Mintz-Plasse] are on board. I’m certainly set up to do it…Yeah, I think it’s going to happen.” Asked about the script, Johnson assures that the new version will keep the faith. “Oh, yeah! It keeps the standard from the first film.” Continuing, Johnson adds about creator Matthew Vaughn: “The only way he was ever going to make a sequel was if it could be anywhere close to the first one, and keep that class and that quality, and just maintain something original and new and refreshing.  And this script delivers all of that, right now.” [ Collider ]

See original here:
Kick-Ass Sequel ‘Keeps Standard’ of the First: Aaron Johnson

R.I.P. Andrew Sarris: Revisit the Influential Film Critic’s Breakthrough Review

Decades after championing auteur theory and tangling with Pauline Kael, New York-based film critic Andrew Sarris has died at the age of 83, survived by his wife, the film critic Molly Haskell. In honor of one of the most influential careers in American film criticism, revisit one of Sarris’s first notable reviews — his celebration of Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal 1960 film Psycho , which the then-32-year-old insisted “should be seen at least three times by any discerning film-goer.” Sarris, whose career spanned stints at the New York Bulletin, the Village Voice, and The New York Observer, popularized and championed the auteur theory after spending time with New Wave filmmakers in Paris. Subbing in for the absent Village Voice critic Jonas Mekas, he infused his review of Psycho with this approach to viewing film as a expression of a director’s personal vision, later solidifying his stance (and coining the phrase “auteur theory”) in his 1962 essay “Notes on the Auteur Theory.” But back to bold beginnings: Read Sarris’s full Psycho review here (re-published in J. Hoberman’s 2010 remembrance), portions of which are excerpted below. “A close inspection of Psycho indicates not only that the French have been right all along, but that Hitchcock is the most-daring avant-garde film-maker in America today. Besides making previous horror films look like variations of Pollyanna , Psycho is overlaid with a richly symbolic commentary on the modern world as a public swamp in which human feelings and passions are flushed down the drain. What once seemed like impurities in his patented cut-and-chase technique now give Psycho and the rest of Hollywood Hitchcock a personal flavor and intellectual penetration which his British classics lack.” “…Hitchcock no longer cheats his endings. Where the mystery of Diabolique , for example, is explained in the most popular after-all-this-is-just-a-movie-and-we’ve-been-taken manner, the solution of Psycho is more ghoulish than the antecedent horror which includes the grisliest murder scenes ever filmed. Although Hitchcock continually teases his conglomerate audience, he never fails to deliver on his most ominous portents. Such divergent American institutions as motherhood and motels, will never seem quite the same again, and only Hitchcock could give a soft-spoken State Trooper the visually sinister overtones of a dehumanized machine patrolling a conformist society.” ” Psycho should be seen at least three times by any discerning film-goer, the first time for the sheer terror of the experience, and on this occasion I fully agree with Hitchcock that only a congenital spoilsport would reveal the plot; the second time for the macabre comedy inherent in the conception of the film; and the third for all the hidden meanings and symbols lurking beneath the surface of the first American movie since Touch of Evil to stand in the same creative rank as the great European films.” [ NYT ] [Photo: Sarris last month at the 25th anniversary of Columbia University’s Film Festival, via Getty Images]

Original post:
R.I.P. Andrew Sarris: Revisit the Influential Film Critic’s Breakthrough Review

REVIEW: Woody Allen Blows Kisses to Rome, and Maybe Even to Us, in To Rome with Love

Before last year’s wistfully joyous Midnight in Paris , Woody Allen ’s movies had gotten so self-conscious and sour-spirited — alleged “returns to form” Match Point , Cassandra’s Dream and Vicky Cristina Barcelona included — that it was hard to have any hope for his future. Do older filmmakers really need a future, especially if, as Allen has, they’ve already banked more than a career’s worth of fine work amid the failures? If they really enjoy working, as Allen seems to, I think they do — a future to shoot for, even if it’s just tomorrow as opposed to next year, might be the very thing that makes them feel alive. To Rome with Love — rangy, vaguely ridiculous and trepidatiously optimistic — is Allen’s film for tomorrow: It will never be listed among his greats, but its willingness to surrender — that is, Allen’s willingness to surrender — to mere pleasantness makes it charming enough. Everything in To Rome with Love , from the city traffic cop who opens the festivities with a “This-a city! It has-a the-million stories!”-style monologue, to the misunderstanding-among-young-marrieds plot thread (just one strand among many), points in the direction of breezy, stress-free pleasure. The picture is slight, but at least it’s filled with air holes, for breathability — Allen is no longer obsessively sealing all the oxygen out, as he did in alleged moral exercises like Cassandra’s Dream , or putting on a false, unflattering sourpuss face, as in Whatever Works . This is an omnibus movie, a picture made up of little stories strung together like party lights: There’s a young New Yorker touring Rome for the summer, played by a winsome Alison Pill, who meets a handsome Italian do-gooder lawyer (Flavio Parenti), launching a love affair that might just last forever. Or maybe not, but its first blush is potent enough to instigate an engagement, which means that the prospective bride’s parents — a bickering pair of mismatched salt-and-pepper shakers played by Allen and Judy Davis — descend upon the city to meet their future son-in-law and his family. Allen, a former music-biz guy specializing in opera, has recently retired, a development that’s brought on a bad case of knitted-eyebrow syndrome. Davis soothes him — so to speak — by assessing his problem thus: His problem is that he equates retirement with death. Done! Get over it! (She’s a psychologist by trade, and clearly a problem-solving type.) Allen finds new hope when he meets the father of his daughter’s fiancé, a mortician, and discovers the man has a wonderful singing voice — but only in the shower. He tries to build a career for this reluctant Caruso, an excuse for Allen the filmmaker to devise some wonderfully ridiculous set pieces. (It doesn’t hurt that the singer is played by real-life tenor Fabio Armiliato.) There’s more: Jesse Eisenberg is a young architect studying in Rome and living happily with his girlfriend (an underused Greta Gerwig), until trouble hits paradise in the form of Gerwig’s best friend, a self-absorbed actress played by Ellen Page. Alec Baldwin, as a once-great architect who now designs shopping malls, pops in and out of this subplot as a kind of Greek chorus, counseling Eisenberg on the best ways not to screw up his life. Elsewhere in Rome, small-town newlyweds played by Alessandro Tiberi and Allessandra Mastronardi have checked into a hotel, with the express purpose of impressing the young groom’s straitlaced and well-connected family, a seemingly simple plan that’s thrown out of whack by the arrival of Penelope Cruz in a tight red dress. (Cruz, playing up her considerable bombshell attributes, is exuberantly, cartoonishly sexy, and possibly the best thing about the movie, as she was in Vicky Cristina Barcelona .) And then there’s Roberto Benigni, finally redeeming himself after his sub- The Day the Clown Cried debacle Life Is Beautiful , as an ordinary middle-class Roman who suddenly finds himself a celebrity for no good reason at all: He blinks at the photographers who swarm around him with their flashbulbs, his face a slapstick pantomime of WTF bewilderment. Not all of these plot threads are created equal, and To Rome with Love drifts in and out of line as Allen tries to wrangle them all into submission, like a balloon salesman on a windy day. And the picture is not without its Allenesque obsessions: The “retirement constitutes death” equation is clearly the director’s way of poking a long, pointy stick into his own subconscious reasons for working like a maniac. (Although, thankfully, his output has slowed a bit in recent years. Making that many smallish movies, in this somewhat inhospitable climate, surely can’t be good for any filmmaker’s disposition.) To Rome with Love, in the end, feels vaguely unsatisfying, perhaps only because it’s not Midnight in Paris, a picture that reckons with one character’s — and Allen’s — longing for a magical dream past that couldn’t possibly have existed. In that film, Allen built his own Paris of the ’20s, a place where Ernest Hemingway, Zelda Fitzgerald and Gertrude Stein could run free in his brain like characters in a Chuck Jones cartoon. The result was rapturous, affirmative, and yet more than a little melancholic. To Rome with Love is far less complex, and not nearly as moodily exhilarating. But it’s dappled with joy here and there, as when supersexy Italian actress Ornella Muti shows up in a cameo, as a fictional movie star named Pia Fusari. It must have tickled Allen to put Muti, a figure straight out of ’70s art-house New York, in one of his movies. We’re used to Woody Allen’s bitter laughter. What a pleasure it is to hear him giggle. Follow Stephanie Zacharek on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Continue reading here:
REVIEW: Woody Allen Blows Kisses to Rome, and Maybe Even to Us, in To Rome with Love