Tag Archives: politics

Time’s Klein: Beck a ‘Telecharlatan’ Who Will Have Hard Time Entering ‘Kingdom of Heaven’

Secular leftists in the media don’t often have use for religion, particularly Christianity, except, it seems, when biblical passages can be isolated out of context to bash religious conservatives over the head as wicked for opposing big government or for standing up for traditional moral values. Enter Joe Klein, Christian theologian extraordinaire, who suggested in Time.com Swampland blog post yesterday that Jesus would make Fox News host Glenn Beck sweat it out a bit at the pearly gates: If Jesus were around today, he might say that it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a telecharlatan to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. In a follow-up blog post from today , Klein thanked a commenter for passing along a passage from the gospel according to St. Matthew wherein Jesus taught that “when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men.” “The noisy proclamation of religiosity is usually a sign of the exact opposite,” Klein preached regarding the August 28 Beck rally. Of course, the teaching Klein cited does not forbid any and all public prayer, it just points out that praying for show as a demonstration of one’s self-righteousness carries no reward with God. Either Klein doesn’t understand that principle or he does and is arguing that the Beck rally was simply a cynical, hypocritical self-righteous display. I think in context, Klein would hold to the latter. Yet in concluding his blog post, Klein seemed to attack Beck and his rally attendees for not being public enough about their religious devotion. The Time writer cited Christ’s  parable of the sheep and goats (Matthew 25:31-46) wherein Jesus pronounced blessing on those who fed the hungry, clothed the naked, and visited the imprisoned because “when you did it to one of the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were doing it to me.”  “It is amazing how infrequently this sentiment is honored by the noisy righteous,” scolded Klein, citing absolutely no evidence for his assertion that the thousands in attendance at the Beck rally are not involved in their quiet lives back home in acts of charity and mercy. Perhaps Klein is alluding to the philosophical opposition Beck and other conservative have to heavy government involvement in social welfare, but if that’s the case Klein would arguably be misappropriating Jesus’s call for personal acts of charity and mercy into a call for government action towards those ends, the opposition against could be castigated as sinful and un-Christlike. At any rate, if Klein wants to play this game, doesn’t he seem a bit judgmental for a guy throwing around Jesus’s words to condemn his neighbor?

View post:
Time’s Klein: Beck a ‘Telecharlatan’ Who Will Have Hard Time Entering ‘Kingdom of Heaven’

David Brooks Discusses Iraq War’s Success Without Mentioning Bush

New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote an article Tuesday largely about the success America has had rebuilding Iraq without ever mentioning the name of former President George W. Bush. To be sure, ” Nation Building Works ” also addressed some of the failures: the absence of “social trust,” the lack of doctors and engineers, as well as rampant corruption to name a few. But in a column published the very day President Obama is to address the nation about Iraq, it seems particularly odd that the man at the helm when America invaded – and who against public sentiment as well as the will of the current White House resident orchestrated a surge of military forces in 2007 largely responsible for the success of this mission – is conspicuously absent: “Iraq has made substantial progress since 2003,” the International Monetary Fund reports. Inflation is reasonably stable. A budget surplus is expected by 2012. Unemployment, though still 15 percent, is down from stratospheric levels. Oil production is back around prewar levels, and there are some who say Iraq may be able to rival Saudi production. That’s probably unrealistic, but Iraq will have a healthy oil economy, for better and for worse. In the most recent Gallup poll, 69 percent of Iraqis rated their personal finances positively, up from 36 percent in March 2007. Baghdad residents say the markets are vibrant again, with new electronics, clothing and even liquor stores. About half the U.S. money has been spent building up Iraqi security forces, and here, too, the trends are positive. Violence is down 90 percent from pre-surge days. There are now more than 400,000 Iraqi police officers and 200,000 Iraqi soldiers, with operational performance improving gradually. According to an ABC News/BBC poll last year, nearly three-quarters of Iraqis had a positive view of the army and the police, including, for the first time, a majority of Sunnis. Sounds pretty darned good, right? Yet Bush’s name is not even mentioned nor is the fact that Obama as Senator voted against the surge and campaigned against the wisdom of it on his road to the White House. As such, who got the de facto credit for the current condition in Iraq as far as this piece was concerned? When President Obama speaks to the country on Iraq, he’ll be able to point to a large national project that has contributed to measurable, positive results. If he is honest, Obama will have to balance pride with caution. He’ll have to acknowledge that the gains the U.S. is enabling may vanish if the U.S. military withdraws entirely next year. He’ll have to acknowledge that bottom-up social change requires time and patience. He’ll have to heed the advice of serious Iraq hands like Crocker, Michael O’Hanlon of Brookings and Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, and shelve plans to withdraw completely. Yes, but nowhere did Brooks advise this President to congratulate or at least acknowledge the former one for going against Obama’s senatorial wishes by orchestrating a surge that made any of the success possible. I’m sure this was just an oversight on Brooks’s part.

Read this article:
David Brooks Discusses Iraq War’s Success Without Mentioning Bush

Joe Joins The Food Police

If Ron Paul were dead, he’d be turning over in his grave . . . Joe Scarborough casts himself as a conservative with a libertarian bent.  Earlier this year, he listed Ron Paul as one of the people he admires, because of Texan’s devotion to “championing less government.”  But at least when it comes to counting calories, Joe has volunteered for the ranks of Mika’s Nanny State Food Police. On today’s Morning Joe, Scarborough declared that he favors forcing all restaurants to put calorie counts on their menus. Joe was responding to Mika’s report that, under the umbrella of ObamaCare, many restaurants will be required to disclose calories. Joe was responding to Mika’s report that, under the umbrella of ObamaCare, many restaurants will be required to diclose calories. Watch as Joe admits that, at least when it comes to food, his supposed libertarian streak was a sham. MIKA BRZEZINSKI: The days of American consumers being in the dark about how many calories they’re consuming may be coming to an end.  In accordance with the recently enacted health-care overhaul, the federal government is requiring movie theaters, airplanes, trains, even grocery-store food courts to post calorie counts. JOE SCARBOROUGH: OK, you know what? I’ve got to drop this act that I do.   Because I know I’m fat, and Mika tells me I’m fat, this act about how I think you’re a bore, and I’ve got to tell.  We went up to Friendly’s, and I’m just going to out them, and I guess I should salute them.  We were in Connecticut, and somebody said, hey, let’s go to Friendly’s, and I said OK, never been.  They put the calories on the menu.  And I would have, without looking, consumed about 2,500 to 3,000 calories.  After looking at the counts on those things, I was just grossed out.  I had soup. This is critical.  It really is. I hate to sound like you.  This is a critical, critical step.  I think all restaurants should be required to put calorie counts next to it. Again, not sounding like you. But I’ve played that act long enough. A true libertarian would observe that information is a commodity. If there’s a demand for calorie counts, if people are more willing to patronize restaurants that provide that information, then restaurants will rush to offer it.  It’s the same principle that accounts for tofu burgers on the Upper West Side and BBQ joints in Texas. We don’t need government to force calorie counts down our throats, excuse the pun. Meanwhile, later in the show Joe sympathized with Bob Herbert’s notion, expressed in his New York Times column of today, that it is wrong to ship “other people’s children” off to fight our wars.  So how about it Joe?  Will you encourage your kids to do the dirty and dangerous work of the Food Police?   “Put down your spatula, and step slowly away from the menu.  Do it now!”

Visit link:
Joe Joins The Food Police

Pelley’s Pathetic Puffball: Mosque Developer Didn’t Have Choice Of Where To Put It

Could Scott Pelley possibly be this naive, or was he willingly playing the role of MSM cheerleader for the developer of the Ground Zero Mosque? In the course of a chummy interview of GZM developer Sharif El-Gamal aired on Sunday’s 60 Minutes, Pelley produced a pearl.  Instead of asking a probing question, the CBS “reporter” served as an advocate for El-Gamal’s position when it came to the siting of the mosque. Pelley, on his own initiative, asserted: “You don’t have your choice of putting this anywhere you want to. There aren’t many spots.” Right.  Not many.  Only tens of thousands of commercial sites in Manhattan.  The mosque men didn’t want to put it near Ground Zero.  Pure coincidence, I tell ya.  They were virtually forced to site it there by the vicissitudes of the merciless real estate market. Hard-hitting stuff, Scott.  Mike Wallace is surely proud.

Read the original post:
Pelley’s Pathetic Puffball: Mosque Developer Didn’t Have Choice Of Where To Put It

Matthews, Fineman and Robinson: Obama Wouldn’t Have Muslim Image Problem If He Had Joined A Church

A truly astonishing thing happened on MSNBC Monday: three devout, liberal Obama supporters said the President is responsible for people thinking he’s a Muslim. During the opening segment of “Hardball,” in a discussion about Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally and how the host and attendees view Obama’s faith, Newsweek’s Howard Fineman said, “Barack Obama probably should have joined a church here…some things in politics you have to do at least for the symbolism.” A bit later, the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson concurred: “Howard Fineman was in the earlier segment, but I tend to agree with him. I think — I expected that when President Obama came to town, he and the family, as he said, would look around, find a church to go to and join a church and go there regularly.” Minutes later, Matthews also agreed saying, “You`re responsible for your reputation” (videos follow with transcripts and commentary): HOWARD FINEMAN, “NEWSWEEK,” MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, first of all, I think all of the people who respect Obama, the president, are relieved that Glenn Beck is just saying that he`s — that Obama is godless and not that he`s a racist. I mean, if you listen to what he was saying there, that`s what — that`s what he was saying on Fox. And what Glenn Beck was doing was letting the rally happen, and then amending his words afterwards. CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Yes. FINEMAN: I mean, if I can use an old-fashioned analogy Richard probably is not familiar wit, in old professional wrestling, you used to have the guy who played dirty who had a razor in his trunks, and when the ref came around, he put them back in. I mean… MATTHEWS: Foreign object. FINEMAN: Yes, foreign object. And Beck was playing very rough before this peaceful rally that Richard covered. MATTHEWS: Right. FINEMAN: And that`s — that`s the game that`s being played now. And as you said in your intro, Barack Obama and his people in the White House seem to me to be curiously passive about it. They`re letting other people handle it. It`s as though the president either doesn`t believe there`s anything he can do about it or that it`s not his role to speak up for himself or to do things or say things that would disprove what they`re talking about. MATTHEWS: Well, to use a Spanish (INAUDIBLE) Richard, the old Pennsylvania expression for dirty politics was spend the first half of the campaign kicking him in the cojones, and the second half, while they`re holding their cojones in pain, talk about the future of Pennsylvania. WOLFFE: Right. MATTHEWS: That`s the oldest trick in the political book. I think he`s following it. He brings these people in with rage and hatred for Obama. Then he gives them a nice Christian, if you will, message, sort of a benediction, if you will, to send them on their way to battle against Obama. RICHARD WOLFFE: Look, it was an impressive turnout. And his comments at the rally — there was nothing wrong with them at all. It was a weird mixture, a kind of rambling thing, but… MATTHEWS: Well, what do you make of the — let`s go to the religious side of this. What — what brand of religion was it? What was it — was it revivalism? WOLFFE: Clearly, it was evangelical. MATTHEWS: Was it “Marjoe”? What was it? WOLFFE: Ironically — ironically — just to relate it to Jeremiah Wright, by the way — Jeremiah Wright is a — is a black — runs a black church within a white denomination. It is a mixture of precisely the kinds of self… MATTHEWS: Yes. WOLFFE: … lifting yourself up and coming together which, actually, this guy was talking about. FINEMAN: Can I say something here that`ll probably get me in trouble? But I`m going to say it anyway. Barack Obama probably should have joined a church here, OK? Now, I`m not excusing any of the hatred or nasty language or any of the dirty strategy that we`re talking about. But some things in politics you have to do at least for the symbolism. MATTHEWS: Yes. FINEMAN: Now, he quit the Jeremiah Wright church, OK? But he hasn`t joined any other. MATTHEWS: Yes. FINEMAN: And had he done so and if he`d done so, but especially if he`d done so… MATTHEWS: Yes. FINEMAN: … after he came to town, a lot of this stuff would never have arisen, in my view. MATTHEWS: Yes. FINEMAN: Now, I`m not taking a Pollyanna… MATTHEWS: I agree (INAUDIBLE) FINEMAN: I`m not taking a Pollyannaish… MATTHEWS: OK. FINEMAN: … -view about these people. But why not? MATTHEWS: OK… FINEMAN: I don`t get it! MATTHEWS: … the subtext… FINEMAN: I don`t get it.  At the beginning of a later segment, Matthews played a clip of Obama telling NBC’s Brian Williams on Sunday what he thinks about all the people in the country that believe he’s a Muslim. After the clip, Matthews turned to his guests:  MATTHEWS: Gene, it astounds me. It grows and grows and grows. Every time we poll, more people believe he`s a Muslim, fewer people think he`s a Christian, more people believe he was born in some other country, like Kenya. It just keeps growing. Can he knock it down with this kind of disdainful comment, just knock it by saying these people are crazy, basically? EUGENE ROBINSON, “WASHINGTON POST,” MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, you know, it hasn`t worked so far. He gets criticized during the campaign for going to a specific Christian church, and now, all of a sudden, people are saying that he`s a Muslim. And this number continues to be high and arguably grows. I mean, Howard Fineman was in the earlier segment, but I tend to agree with him. I think — I expected that when President Obama came to town, he and the family, as he said, would look around, find a church to go to and join a church and go there regularly. MATTHEWS: Don`t they do that? I guess not. ROBINSON: No, they have… MATTHEWS: Not that there… (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: There`s a performance aspect to American religious life, let`s face it. ROBINSON: Well, there is, and… (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: … social event. ROBINSON: And that`s what I expected them to do. And I think had they done that, this issue wouldn`t be… MATTHEWS: Gene, Gene, Gene… (CROSSTALK) MATTHEWS: Before we leave you, I — do we — so we`re not getting the usual Monday morning picture of the president coming out of a church, usually a Protestant church, with a Bible in his hand or a missal or something in his hand, not…  Matthews then played a clip of Beck on “Fox News Sunday” telling Chris Wallace the problems he has with the President’s faith. At its conclusion, Matthews turned to his guests:  MATTHEWS: Wow. It really is getting personal. We`re getting a religious test thrown at — we`re not supposed to have religious tests. There`s Beck applying one.   ROBINSON: Yes. First of all, we would flunk Glenn Beck on his theology exam, number one. He`s not much of a theologian. Second, what is ironic about this whole nonissue is that at least in my experience, to the extent that I know the president, he seems to be a man of great faith, of real and genuine faith. He talks about his faith and the faith of his family and how it sustains him and how it sustains him in difficult moments.   (CROSSTALK)    ROBINSON: And so yet that doesn`t come across…    (CROSSTALK)    MATTHEWS: It doesn`t come across.    (CROSSTALK)    MATTHEWS: By the way, the role of a politician is to lead.    DAVID CORN: It`s not the president`s job.    (CROSSTALK)    MATTHEWS: No, it is the president`s job.    (CROSSTALK)    CORN: Not to talk about salvation.    (CROSSTALK)    CORN: It`s not his job to talk about salvation. And you know what? Today, I got a couple press releases from fundamentalist Christian groups on the right attacking because they believe Mormons are not true Christians. So, once we get into this game, no one — no one should cast ones.    (CROSSTALK)    MATTHEWS: OK. Let me reeducate you, as if you guys need it, or anybody watching doesn`t know this rule. You`re responsible for your reputation. And if people are painting a picture, whether it`s swift-boating or whatever nonsense they`re putting out about you, Michael Dukakis taught us this back, what, 20, 30 years ago. They can say all these terrible things about you. If you let them stick, that`s your problem. It may not be morally your problem, but it`s politically your problem. We`re not saying the president should be talking about his religion publicly to anybody. We`re saying it`s hurting him.  As hard as it is for me to admit it, these three liberals were all right for a change. The President of the United States has a more powerful bully pulpit to speak from than anyone on the planet. By not joining a new church when he moved to our nation’s capital, he foolishly left himself open for religious questioning. That he and his administration have sat back for approaching two years and allowed the narrative to be led by others shows a tremendous lack of leadership skills on their part. Much more surprising is that liberals like Matthews, Fineman, and Robinson would admit it with cameras rolling. I guess this is an indication of just how poorly Obama is doing as President when some of his biggest supporters in the media are starting to publicly voice their displeasure with him.

View original post here:
Matthews, Fineman and Robinson: Obama Wouldn’t Have Muslim Image Problem If He Had Joined A Church

Obama Defends His Support For Ground Zero Mosque

President Barack Obama sat down recently with NBC’s Brian Williams to reinforce his support for the Ground Zero mosque. He also took the time to blame the media for the initial misunderstanding of his comments when he first weighed in on the issue. Yet in the interview broadcast on August 29, there was no mention by the “Nightly News” anchor of how Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is at odds with Obama over the proposed location. For more information, check out this post on the Eyeblast.tv blog .

Go here to read the rest:
Obama Defends His Support For Ground Zero Mosque

ABC’s Stephanopoulos Highlights Obama Blaming Media For Muslim Myth

On Monday’s Good Morning America, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos played up how President Obama “blamed many in the media for perpetuating…myths” such as he was born outside the United States, isn’t a Christian, and/or is a Muslim. “You can’t blame the President for wanting this to go away.” Stephanopoulos raised the President’s remarks about “these kind of myths,” as he put it, near the end of a panel discussion with Democratic strategist James Carville and Charles Schwab chief investment strategist Liz Ann Sonders eight minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour. He noted how “a third of Americans believe- question whether he is Christian- a fifth now believe he’s Muslim” before playing a clip of Mr. Obama from his recent interview with NBC’s Brian Williams , where the Democrat gave a light reply to Williams’s statement referencing these poll numbers: “Mr. President, you’re an American-born Christian, and yet, increasing and now significant numbers of American in polls…are claiming you are neither.” The President answered, in part, “I would say that I can’t spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.” Moments earlier in the interview, Obama stated that “there is a mechanism, a network of misinformation, that in a new media era can get churned out there constantly,” and this is the remark that the ABC anchor zeroed-in on: “You can’t blame the President for wanting this to go away. He also blamed many in the media for perpetuating these kind of myths. But is there anything more he has to do affirmatively to address this, or just hope that it goes away?” Somewhat predictably, Carville lashed out against those who believed in any of those: “That people are willing to go out and promote this kind of thing- it’s unfortunate. But the most unfortunate thing is that people are stupid enough to believe that out there.” Exactly two months earlier, on June 30, Stephanopoulos brought on liberal columnist Maureen Dowd who bashed the President as “thin-skinned” and unhappy with his media coverage. This prompted the anchor to acknowledge, ” And his press hasn’t been nearly as bad as he thinks .” One wonders if the former Clinton communications director would still admit that. The transcript of the relevant portion of the segment from Monday’s Good Morning America, starting at the 12 minutes into the 7 am hour mark: STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me bring James Carville back in here. James, before we go, the President did get those questions from Brian Williams about how- you know, a third of Americans believe- question whether he is Christian- a fifth now believe he’s Muslim. Let’s show again what the President said. OBAMA (from NBC News interview): Well- look, Brian, I would say that I can’t spend all my time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead. (laughs) It is what- the facts are the facts. And so, it’s not something that I can, I think, spend all my time worrying about. STEPHANOPOULOS: You can’t blame the President for wanting this to go away. He also blamed many in the media for perpetuating these kind of myths. But is there anything more he has to do affirmatively to address this, or just hope that it goes away? CARVILLE: I think Abraham Lincoln said something to the effect that we know that the Lord loves poor people because he made so many of them. I think the President should have said we know the Lord loves stupid people because he made so many of them. (laughs) I mean, what can you do, if somebody like- contrary to every piece of evidence known to man, doesn’t think that he was born in the United States, or, contrary to all the evidence known, that he’s not a Christian. There’s nothing that can be done, and I think he was saying as much to that. That people are willing to go out and promote this kind of thing- it’s unfortunate. But the most unfortunate thing is that people are stupid enough to believe that out there. STEPHANOPOULOS: All right. James Carville, Liz Ann Sonders, thanks very much.

More:
ABC’s Stephanopoulos Highlights Obama Blaming Media For Muslim Myth

NYT’s Kate Zernike Does It Again, Suggests Tea Party Opposition to Minimum Wage Racially Suspect

New York Times reporter Kate Zernike, whose book on the Tea Party movement,”Boiling Mad,” is due out next month, led off Saturday’s National section by suggesting racism on the part of Fox News host Glenn Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally at the Lincoln Memorial later that day. Beck has outraged the left with the timing of the rally, the 47th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s March on Washington and the “I Have a Dream” speech. Although Zernike and others in the media use “Tea Party faithful” as shorthand to mark the rally, the actual gathering on Saturday turned out to be far more religious than political, with Zernike herself likening it to a “large church picnic” in her Sunday coverage. But Zernike led her Saturday preview of the rally, ” Where Dr. King Once Stood, Tea Party Claims His Mantle ,” with accusations of racism: It seems the ultimate thumb in the eye: that Glenn Beck would summon the Tea Party faithful to a rally on the anniversary of the March on Washington, and address them from the very place where the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I have a dream” speech 47 years ago. After all, the Tea Party and its critics have been facing off for months over accusations of racism. But many of the busloads of Tea Party activists expected in Washington this weekend do not see any irony or offense. In fact, they have come to see the Tea Party as the aggrieved — its loosely affiliated members unfairly characterized, even persecuted, as extremists. Those same “accusations of racism” foisted on the Tea Party movement by hostile reporters like Zernike. (The rally itself turned out to be a largely apolitical celebration of patriotism and religion.) Zernike has a very sensitive ear for linking conservatism and racism, notoriously finding racial undertones where they don’t exist, as when she accused conservative speaker Jason Mattera of using a “Chris Rock voice” in a February 18 post for the Times’ political blog, ” CPAC Speaker Bashes Obama, in Racial Tones .” Mattera was in fact speaking in his usual thick Brooklynese. Zernike has long employed unsubstantiated racial accusations to boost her hostile coverage of the movement. On Saturday she made some stunning guilt-by-association leaps, one being that opposition to the minimum wage makes you racially suspect. In the Tea Party’s talk of states’ rights, critics say they hear an echo of slavery, Jim Crow and George Wallace. Tea Party activists call that ridiculous: they do not want to take the country back to the discrimination of the past, they say, they just want the states to be able to block the federal mandate on health insurance. Still, the government programs that many Tea Party supporters call unconstitutional are the ones that have helped many black people emerge from poverty and discrimination. It is not just that Rand Paul, the Republican nominee for Senate in Kentucky, said that he disagreed on principle with the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that required business owners to serve blacks. It is that many Tea Party activists believe that laws establishing a minimum wage or the federal safety net are an improper expansion of federal power. Critics rightly note that Dr. King spoke over and over of the need for this country to acknowledge its “debt to the poor,” calling for an “economic bill of rights” that would “guarantee a job to all people who want to work and are able to work.” In Mr. Beck’s taxonomy, this would make him a Marxist. Even if Tea Party members are right that any racist signs are those of mischief-makers, even if Glenn Beck had chosen any other Saturday to hold his rally, it would be hard to quiet the argument about the Tea Party and race. Leaving aside the questionable assumption that minimum wage laws actually benefit blacks, the idea of King as a leftist or Marxist is hardly a new or controversial idea. King was an admirer of Marx, as reported on page 537 of the Pulitzer Prize-winning biography by David Garrow, ” Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference .” Garrow encapsulated King’s discussions during a retreat with his SCLC staff: “Actually, he went on, there was much to admire about Karl Marx, who had ‘a great passion for social justice” but had fallen afoul of the theoretical errors of materialism.” Note that Zernike concluded that the “argument about the Tea Party and race” wasn’t going away, which is certainly true if reporters like Zernike fan the flames. In addition, liberal columnists Charles Blow and Bob Herbert both went after Beck on Saturday. Blow’s ” Glenn Beck’s Nightmare ” was more in sorrow: “Beck wants to swaddle his movement in the cloth of the civil rights movement, a cloth soaked in the blood and tears of the innocent and oppressed, a cloth his divisiveness and self-aggrandizing threatens to defile.” On the same page, Herbert’s criticism came more in anger : “Beck is a provocateur who likes to play with matches in the tinderbox of racial and ethnic confrontation. He seems oblivious to the real danger of his execrable behavior.”

View original post here:
NYT’s Kate Zernike Does It Again, Suggests Tea Party Opposition to Minimum Wage Racially Suspect

Unhinged Ed Schultz Goes on Psycho Talk Promo of Failing Show

Your pink slip is on the way. That is the fear that is probably driving Ed Schultz completely over the edge. And Big Ed probably insured the likelihood of that outcome when he recently threatened to go postal and torch MSNBC when that network neglected to promote his abysmally rated show on an election night. Brian Maloney at the Radio Equalizer has recorded the Schultz dementia from his radio show as he pathetically makes the case for the “success” of his failing MSNBC Big Ed show. The full transcript is below the fold but first an excerpt from his demonic rant which demonstrates why the MSNBC suits, for safety sake, might want to pass Ed through a metal detector whenever he enters their studio: And you have no idea, in my bones, in my very soul! In my heart! I want to kick Fox’s ass! I want to drive them into the ground! I want to spike the ball! I want to kick ’em in the teeth on the way back to the huddle! And then I want to turn around and lift my leg on ’em! Because that’s all they’re worth! Here is a transcript  of Ed Schultz in rabid rant mode but the full extent of his uncontrollable rage must be heard to be fully appreciated: Now, Beck has big ratings at 5 o’clock. But at 6 o’clock against me, they drop damn near through the floor. They lose half their audience. In the meantime, The Ed Show, right now, this month of August, we are beating CNN in the demographic 25-54 by 1.2 million people. In total viewers for the month of August, we are beating CNN by 3.77 million. We’re starting to play in the arena of the big boys now.  And it’s not because of me. It’s because you, the viewers and listeners to this show. Now, the other night we got as close as we’ve ever gotten to beating Fox. Bret Baier beat me by 103 points in the demo, 103. Now you see, you have to understand that, they have a big audience but, hell, they’re all old! In 25-54, we’re getting in the neighborhood. …And you have no idea, in my bones, in my very soul! In my heart! I want to kick Fox’s ass! I want to drive them into the ground! I want to spike the ball! I want to kick ’em in the teeth on the way back to the huddle! And then I want to turn around and lift my leg on ’em! Because that’s all they’re worth! MSNBC executives might want to listen carefully to the unhinged fury of their own host before handing him the pink slip. For your own safety, don’t do it while Schultz is still in the studio or you could risk the scorched earth that he threatened…or worse. It would be best to inform him while he is at home during a long weekend. Please be sure to deliver his personal effects to his front door so there would be no need for Big Ed to ever return to the MSNBC studio. Have a happy Labor Day weekend, Ed, and enjoy the music .

More:
Unhinged Ed Schultz Goes on Psycho Talk Promo of Failing Show

Newsweek’s Alter Blames Fox News, Conservatives for Birtherism, Obama-is-Muslim Sentiment

In an August 28 online column, Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter ripped into Fox News and conservative Republican leaders for painting Barack Obama as a closet Muslim and potentially a foreign-born person illegible to hold the office of the presidency. But while he tarred the Left’s usual bogeymen with the specious charges, Alter failed to produce documented evidence of any instance in which any mainstream conservative Republican leader or Fox News talent specifically charged that President Obama is either a Muslim or was not born in the United States. Instead the Newsweek veteran resorted to an all-too-typical refuge: insisting that conservative opinion leaders speak in some sort of “coded language” which apparently their followers understand instinctively and only enlightened liberals like Alter can see through as a cleverly-deployed Jedi mind trick: When the racist Gerald L.K. Smith charged in 1937 that FDR was a secret Jew (he later called Dwight Eisenhower a “Swedish Jew”), no one could have imagined that the Senate minority leader would be asked about it, much less tacitly endorse the claim. But there was Mitch McConnell last week saying that “I take the president at his word” when he says he’s not a Muslim. That’s what’s known in politics as a “dog whistle”—a coded message to followers. Many conservatives don’t accept Obama’s “word” on anything. McConnell was thus giving them permission to consider the president’s faith an open question, even as he said it wasn’t in dispute. Beyond validation by politicians and the right-wing media, the best explanation for why growing numbers of Americans think the president is a Muslim is that more and more voters don’t like him personally, and so are increasingly ready to believe anything critical (and to them, being Muslim is a negative) about someone they are already inclined to resent. Call this associational distortion. It’s a good bet that if the economy improves, so will the percentage of voters who say that Barack Obama is a Christian. Not only, apparently, is Alter capable of discerning the motives of McConnell’s heart, he’s somehow able to divine that many voters’ misperceptions about Obama’s religious faith are tied to their economic anxiety alone. Who knew Alter was a brilliant psychotherapist and sociologist on top of being a left-wing political journalist?

Here is the original post:
Newsweek’s Alter Blames Fox News, Conservatives for Birtherism, Obama-is-Muslim Sentiment