Tag Archives: psych

Eminem, Jay-Z Fans Travel Across U.S. For Detroit Concert

‘You’ll never see anything like it again,’ one fan says of hip-hop legends’ joint show. By Mawuse Ziegbe, with reporting by Rahman Dukes Eminem and Jay-Z (file) Photo: Getty Images Very rarely do two hip-hop titans of Eminem and Jay-Z’s caliber team up to mount a series of stadium shows for their legions of rabid fans. Still, it’s astonishing to see the lengths that Shady and Hov heads would go to see the pair onstage. Their fans crisscrossed the country to see the duo light up the stage at Comerica Park in Em’s hometown of Detroit. The Thursday (September 2) event is the first stop on the duo’s Home and Home Tour and their followers showed major support; braving a possible downpour and donning Jay and Em memorabilia. “We’re all psyched,” said one fan who had rolled to the concert with three other homies. “How many times do you get to see Eminem play in his [hometown of] Detroit?” The fan, sporting a Jigga/Eminem T-shirt, added that the outing was really special because it was the first live show he’d attended. “The fact that it’s Eminem and Jay-Z just helps a lot.” Kipper revealed that he and his buddy J.T. traveled from Green Bay, Wisconsin, to take in the show. “I … came down to [see] something different, something big. This is the biggest concert of the year,” he marveled. “You’ll never see anything like it again.” Two of the rappers’ most dedicated fans not only crossed state lines to catch the Comerica show but even employed their passports, trekking from Ottawa, Canada, for the collabo show. “I really hope Eminem plays ‘Going Through Changes’ [from Recovery ]. I really like that song,” said Karen who, along with her friend, had fashioned homemade tees emblazoned with lyrics from The Eminem Show ‘s “Superman” and two Jay-Z’s smashes, “Run This Town” and “99 Problems.” Another fan, Jay, who traveled from Pittsburgh, was happy that Em was giving back to his hometown in the form of a major musical event. “He should show the love from where he came from. They helped him to get where he’s at. The least [he] could do is put on a big-bang show for ’em [and] show some respect,” he said. He added that he was checking out the show to see some of the game’s most talented MCs show their skills. “I mean, the best two lyricists to ever do it [are performing]. So, I’m trying to come and get some knowledge real quick.” Not even bad weather could stop fans from seeing the Grammy-winning legends hit the stage. “I’m just so pumped to see it,” “D” said. “I’ll see it in the rain, I don’t care.” One concertgoer, who donned a tank top that read “#1 Fan,” had a personal message for Shady: “Eminem if you ever see this, my name is Lindsay and I go to Michigan State and you should totally call me.” Are you going to see Jay-Z and Eminem in concert? Did you catch the Detroit show? Let us know in the comments! Related Photos Jay-Z And Eminem: Other Megastar Concert Pairings MCs And Their Hometown Stadiums Jay-Z And Eminem: Stadium Face-Off Related Artists Jay-Z Eminem

View original post here:
Eminem, Jay-Z Fans Travel Across U.S. For Detroit Concert

CBS Early Show Promotes Palin-Bashing Vanity Fair Article

On Thursday’s CBS Early Show, fill-in co-host Erica Hill interviewed Vanity Fair reporter Michael Joseph Gross about his article slamming Sarah Palin with outlandish accusations: “…we’ve watched Sarah Palin go from a small town hockey mom and the mayor to international celebrity….it certainly changed her, that’s according to a rather unflattering new article in Vanity Fair magazine. ” Talking to Gross, Hill noted how he “had a tough time…getting to people who are close to Sarah Palin,” but wondered: “…tell us about the people you did speak to who are around her….What kind of an impression did they give you of Sarah Palin?” Gross detailed some of the wild claims made by his questionable sources: “They’d tell stories about screaming fits, about throwing things….where Sarah and Todd will empty the pantry of canned goods, throwing them at each other until the front of the refrigerator looks like it’s been shot up by a shot gun.” Taken in by the story, Hill simply replied: “Wow.” Gross continued, alleging that Palin “tortured” former assistants, one of whom “had to quit the job, seek psychiatric counseling, and leave the state to escape Palin’s influence.” He asserted: “…[Palin] exacts retribution on people after they leave. They’re afraid that she’s going to get them fired from their job, try to ruin their reputations. That’s the modus operandi.” Earlier in the interview, he described Palin’s current political activity as an effort to exact “a kind of vengeance on the country for rejecting her” in the 2008 election. Hill seemed puzzled about Palin’s refusal to talk to Gross for the vicious hit piece: “These are all some pretty strong allegations. You tried to get in touch….with Sarah Palin, with her media people….Did they tell you why they wouldn’t speak with you?” Gross replied: “I tried everything. I tried sending messages through her father, through her hairdresser. I spent almost three weeks in Wasilla.” Hill wrapped up the segment by endorsing the smear: “It’s a fascinating article. It’s a fascinating read.” Prior to Hill’s interview with Gross, correspondent Nancy Cordes reported on the Vanity Fair attack: “The story portrays Palin as leading a life shrouded in secrecy, using fear to control those around her.” One accusation she highlighted: “The article gives new details about Palin’s heavily publicized campaign spending habits, saying she purchased over 400 items, including $3,000 on underwear and $20,000 on a new wardrobe for her husband, Todd.” A sound bite was featured from Politico’s Andrew Barr, who proclaimed: “…it seems like they’re [the Palins] going around, trying to, you know, bilk the RNC and others for as much money as they could get.” Cordes also noted: “Gross claims that before [Levi] Johnston issued a public apology to Palin, she met with him privately and demanded to know if he was wearing a wire.” She then touted how the Early Show provided a platform to Johnston yet again last week : “In an exclusive interview with the Early Show last Friday, Levi said he regretted making that statement [the apology].”    Here is a full transcript of the September 2 segment: 8:30AM TEASE ERICA HILL: Also ahead, we’ve watched Sarah Palin go from a small town hockey mom and the mayor to international celebrity. That kind of sudden fame can change anyone. And it certainly changed her, that’s according to a rather unflattering new article in Vanity Fair magazine. We’re going to speak with the author of that article, who followed Palin on the trail for months, spoke to dozens of people who know her. We’ll see the picture that he says emerged. 8:40AM SEGMENT ERICA HILL: For two years now, Sarah Palin has been in the national spotlight. Making a political impact that’s felt from Washington to Hollywood and, of course, in Alaska. Her life has changed and so has her family’s. And as CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes tells us, those changes, according to a new report, aren’t always flattering. SARAH PALIN: We must restore America- [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Inside Palin’s World; New Revelations About Fmr. Alaska Governor] NANCY CORDES: She’s the Republican Party’s top draw. And Sarah Palin’s influence appears to be growing. She’s backed 20 winning candidates in this year’s primaries. But in an article published in this month’s Vanity Fair, author Michael Joseph Gross claims Palin is not who she appears to be. The story portrays Palin as leading a life shrouded in secrecy, using fear to control those around her. ANDREW BARR [REPORTER, POLITICO.COM]: Everyone who was leaking, who was talking to the press has been cut out of her circle. CORDES: The article gives new details about Palin’s heavily publicized campaign spending habits, saying she purchased over 400 items, including $3,000 on underwear and $20,000 on a new wardrobe for her husband, Todd. BARR: If you look through the campaign e-mails, if you look through disclosures, it seems like they’re going around, trying to, you know, bilk the RNC and others for as much money as they could get. CORDES: The article also sheds light on Palin’s public feud with her daughter’s former fiancee, Levi Johnston. Gross claims that before Johnston issued a public apology to Palin, she met with him privately and demanded to know if he was wearing a wire. In an exclusive interview with the Early Show last Friday, Levi said he regretted making that statement. LEVI JOHNSTON: The only thing I wish I wouldn’t have done is put out that apology, because it kind of makes me sound like a liar. CORDES: Palin has not commented on the article. In two weeks she will headline a GOP event in Iowa, adding to the speculation about her political plans for 2012. Nancy Cordes, CBS News, Washington. HILL: Joining us now is Vanity Fair writer Michael Joseph Gross. His article, ‘Sarah Palin: The Sound and the Fury,’ is in the magazine’s upcoming issue. Good to have you with us this morning. MICHAEL JOSEPH GROSS: Thanks for having me. HILL: You said the most important quote in this article is, ‘we weren’t good enough for America.’ Why do you feel that’s the most important quote that you have there? GROSS: When Sarah Palin got back to Wasilla after the election, she was in her house. The people from the Republican Party were trying to collect the clothing that had been purchased for return. She was talking to one of her children and she was crying and she said, ‘we weren’t good enough for America. We’ll never be good enough for America.’ I think she felt so rejected by this election that what we’re seeing subsequently has been a kind of vengeance on the country for rejecting her. I think what she’s doing is plugging into a similar sense of rejection among millions of people out there who feel like they’re not good enough. HILL: You had a tough time, you say, getting to people who are close to Sarah Palin, let alone Sarah Palin. First, tell us about the people you did speak to who are around her, who had been close in her camps. What kind of an impression did they give you of Sarah Palin? GROSS: The people who’ve been closest to her describe a temper that at first I couldn’t even believe could be true. They’d tell stories about screaming fits, about throwing things. We’re talking about everybody from friends who’ve stayed with the Palins, who’ve witnessed events where Sarah and Todd will empty the pantry of canned goods, throwing them at each other until the front of the refrigerator looks like it’s been shot up by a shot gun. HILL: Wow. GROSS: Everything from that to former assistants who’ve been so tortured by Palin that, in one case, one had to quit the job, seek psychiatric counseling, and leave the state to escape Palin’s influence. Because everybody who’s worked with her has seen the way that she exacts retribution on people after they leave. They’re afraid that she’s going to get them fired from their job, try to ruin their reputations. That’s the modus operandi. HILL: These are all some pretty strong allegations. You tried to get in touch with the Palin – with Sarah Palin, with her media people. A) Were you successful? And B) Did they tell you why they wouldn’t speak with you? Because they didn’t for this article. GROSS: The only responses that I received from them were that my request was under consideration. There was never any resolution to the conversation. That message was sent multiple times. And I tried everything. I tried sending messages through her father, through her hairdresser. I spent almost three weeks in Wasilla. So- HILL: Good to have you with us. It’s a fascinating article. It’s a fascinating read. GROSS: Thank you. HILL: Thanks for being with us. Michael Joseph Gross joining us from Vanity Fair.

See original here:
CBS Early Show Promotes Palin-Bashing Vanity Fair Article

Psych Season 5 Episode 8 – Shawn 2.0

Watch Psych S5E8: Shawn 2.0 The new installment of Psych which is entitled “Shawn 2.0” is the

Hardball: Beck’s ‘Bandwagon of Bigotry and Fear’ Kind of Like KKK

On Tuesday, NewsBusters identified the media’s emerging strategy of discrediting Glenn Beck by pitting his religious beliefs against other Christians. Mere hours later, as if on cue, MSNBC was all over it. “Hardball” host Chris Matthews invited on liberal Salon editor Joan Walsh and Democratic strategist Bob Shrum, two people who are something less than experts on the religious right, to help him psychoanalyze conservatives. Their conclusion was all too predictable: Beck’s rhetoric is harmful to Catholics and smacks of anti-Papal Klan rallies. It has now been established by the media that Mormons like Beck are anti-evangelical, anti-Catholic, and possibly just plain anti-Christian. Prepare yourself for liberals who bash conservative Christians at every turn to suddenly care about Christians getting bashed (video below with partial transcript): BOB SHRUM, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Yes, that used to be the rule. But Beck himself clearly is riding a bandwagon of bigotry and fear to gather millions of followers and millions of dollars. He`s made anti-Muslim remarks. He`s made remarks about the president that are certainly tinged with racial overtones. So why wouldn`t he associate with an anti-Catholic? CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: OK, let me get to the roots of this because a lot of this stuff going on on the right has its roots, Joan — and you know, Bob, well — back in the old roots, way back with the “no nothings,” the KKK, the nativists. There`s a smell to this commentary by Hagee, which is anybody that has their religious vaguely from Europe or somewhere else or from Rome, that somehow, it`s bad, it`s un-American. It`s the old nativist cry against the newcomer. But we thought this was sort of dying off somewhere during World War II, when, you know, several million Catholics were fighting the bad guys. We thought this was over with, you and I and Bob. Apparently, it`s still going on with Hagee and his new buddy, Glenn Beck. JOAN WALSH, SALON: Well, you know, I`ve seen this in the mosque debate, as well. We know that, you know, our ancestors, and not very far back, Chris, our very right to participate in public life was questioned because we were supposedly, you know, the subjects of a foreign power, the pope. And so, you know, there`s been a lot of this in right-wing politics for a long time. There have been a lot of battles, and many Catholics have felt, frankly, unwelcome in the Christian right. The other thing, though, that Beck is trying to do here is to unite the Tea Party with the Christian right — MATTHEWS: Right. WALSH: — which has felt a little bit excluded by the Tea Party. If you look at polls, Tea Partiers are less into the Christian right than they are into, say, big business. And it`s been — MATTHEWS: Yes. WALSH: There`s been a little bit of waning of their power, so that`s the other thing that went on on Saturday. It was a dark day when Catholics were discouraged from civil activity because of religious beliefs, and liberals like Walsh will be sure to explain that while attacking civil activists over their religious beliefs. Would that pro-life Catholics were treated with such kid gloves at MSNBC. Or does religious sensitivity only apply to the liberal variety?

Excerpt from:
Hardball: Beck’s ‘Bandwagon of Bigotry and Fear’ Kind of Like KKK

Newsweek’s Alter Blames Fox News, Conservatives for Birtherism, Obama-is-Muslim Sentiment

In an August 28 online column, Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter ripped into Fox News and conservative Republican leaders for painting Barack Obama as a closet Muslim and potentially a foreign-born person illegible to hold the office of the presidency. But while he tarred the Left’s usual bogeymen with the specious charges, Alter failed to produce documented evidence of any instance in which any mainstream conservative Republican leader or Fox News talent specifically charged that President Obama is either a Muslim or was not born in the United States. Instead the Newsweek veteran resorted to an all-too-typical refuge: insisting that conservative opinion leaders speak in some sort of “coded language” which apparently their followers understand instinctively and only enlightened liberals like Alter can see through as a cleverly-deployed Jedi mind trick: When the racist Gerald L.K. Smith charged in 1937 that FDR was a secret Jew (he later called Dwight Eisenhower a “Swedish Jew”), no one could have imagined that the Senate minority leader would be asked about it, much less tacitly endorse the claim. But there was Mitch McConnell last week saying that “I take the president at his word” when he says he’s not a Muslim. That’s what’s known in politics as a “dog whistle”—a coded message to followers. Many conservatives don’t accept Obama’s “word” on anything. McConnell was thus giving them permission to consider the president’s faith an open question, even as he said it wasn’t in dispute. Beyond validation by politicians and the right-wing media, the best explanation for why growing numbers of Americans think the president is a Muslim is that more and more voters don’t like him personally, and so are increasingly ready to believe anything critical (and to them, being Muslim is a negative) about someone they are already inclined to resent. Call this associational distortion. It’s a good bet that if the economy improves, so will the percentage of voters who say that Barack Obama is a Christian. Not only, apparently, is Alter capable of discerning the motives of McConnell’s heart, he’s somehow able to divine that many voters’ misperceptions about Obama’s religious faith are tied to their economic anxiety alone. Who knew Alter was a brilliant psychotherapist and sociologist on top of being a left-wing political journalist?

Here is the original post:
Newsweek’s Alter Blames Fox News, Conservatives for Birtherism, Obama-is-Muslim Sentiment

‘Black Swan’ Director Darren Aronofsky On Ballet, Natalie Portman And Lesbian Kisses

‘She took the part and ran with it,’ director says of film’s star Portman. By Eric Ditzian Natalie Portman in “Black Swan” Photo: 20th Century Fox In one corner, you have Mickey Rourke, all serrated flesh and oozing blood, leaping from the top rope because that’s how wrestlers roll. In the other corner, you have Natalie Portman, austere and intense, turning pirouettes because that’s what a ballerina is born to do. The two are connected, if you can believe it. And why not? As Darren Aronofsky explains, 2008’s Oscar-nominated “Wrestler” is in essence a companion piece to his forthcoming “Black Swan.” The athletes he focuses on are so consumed with their professions that they are swept up and eventually overtaken, with the end result being that there is no dividing line between ballerina and ballet, between wrestler and wrestling. In the new film, Natalie Portman stars as Nina, a New York City ballerina about to assume the lead position in her company for a production of “Swan Lake.” Competition and disturbing psychological warfare arrive in the form of the rival dancer Lilly (Mila Kunis), who awakens in Nina a dark side that brings objective reality into question. Aronofsky has been wanting to make a film about the world of ballet for a decade. In a recent interview with MTV News, the director spoke about the movie’s psychological and supernatural undertones, the research he did for the film and the much-buzzed-about make-out session between the two leading ladies. MTV: Let’s begin with the “Black Swan” trailer , because it really seemed to capture people’s imaginations. How involved to you get in the process? What are you looking to communicate and also withhold? Darren Aronofsky: It’s funny, because I literally finished the film yesterday. It’s been a incredible mad dash to the finishing line, and to be frank, I really surrendered to the studio and I have to credit Fox Seachlight with doing a lot of the heavy lifting. In the past, I’ve worked very hard on the trailers, but I just didn’t have any time. I had to finish the movie. When I saw the trailer for the first time, I was very impressed. I thought it was exciting. You never know how audiences are going to react. I generally do these films that are hard to fit into boxes and they’re hard to sum up in two minutes. I’m glad people are enjoying it. MTV: And I guess it doesn’t hurt to have . Aronofsky: Yeah, I know. A lot of people already knew that was happening. A screenplay got out there and someone wrote about it on the Internet and the next thing you know CNN is reporting on it. It’s definitely something that happens in the film, but it’s just the tip of the exciting things that happen. MTV: I think it’s kind of interesting for you to be going from wrestling to ballet, because there’s probably more of a similarity there than people might think, just in terms of choreography and competitiveness and things like that. Aronofsky: Exactly. I’ve always considered the two films companion pieces. They are really connected and people will see the connections. It’s funny, because wrestling some consider the lowest art — if they would even call it art — and ballet some people consider the highest art. But what was amazing to me was how similar the performers in both of these worlds are. They both make incredible use of their bodies to express themselves. They’re both performers. At one point, way before I made “The Wrestler,” I was actually developing a project that was about a love affair between a ballet dancer and a wrestler, and then it kind of split off into two movies. So I guess my dream is that some art theater will play the films as a double feature some day. MTV: I have a feeling if you suggest it, someone will take you up on it. They’ll just make you run the projector and scoop the popcorn. Aronofsky: Exactly. I’m fine with that. MTV: I know you did a lot of research for “The Wrestler,” going to matches and talking to wrestlers. What was your process like for “Black Swan”? Aronofsky: Ballet is a very insular world. There’s a lot of privacy, and it’s hard to get in. Normally when you say, “I want to make a movie about your world,” the doors open up and you get tremendous access. The ballet world could give two sh–s about anyone making a film about their world. For people that do ballet, ballet is their universe and they’re not impressed by movies. I did find dancers that shared their stories with me, some retired, some working. Eventually I got to stand backstage when the Bolshoi came to Lincoln Center, standing in the wings watching some of the greatest dancers in the world. I got to see some amazing athletes up close and experience what they were going through. MTV: Are you standing there watching as a director, like storyboarding your movie, or are you just taking in the spectacle? Aronofsky: Most of my time, I’d be thinking, “This is an amazing closeup, but how am I going to let audiences appreciate this?” Wrestling, it’s very clear how to show that. My goal there was to show how much it actually, physically hurt. People always think it’s fake, and my point was, “Sure it’s fake, the outcome is already decided, but the stunts are not fake. These are real people falling onto a concrete floor.” For me, what was so interesting about ballet was these athletes have done it for so many years — some of them start at four or five years old — and they make it effortless, so that you cannot see the skill involved. It’s almost impossible to experience how hard it is to get your leg over your head when you’re standing on the tip of your foot. It looks so easy. But when you’re up close, you can see the muscles ripping. For me, it was about, “How do I make that effort visually exciting?” MTV: I spoke with Natalie back when she was promoting “Brothers,” and she talked about wanting to get away from “cute and girly” roles . “Black Swan” clearly doesn’t seem cute and girly. What’s your sense of why she wanted in? Aronofsky: It’s kind of weird. It came together really well. One of the best things about the film is the casting of Natalie. She took the part and ran with it. I don’t know if when I was working with the writers we were consciously channeling Natalie or Natalie somehow transformed herself to the part, but they grew together. I first talked with Natalie about this project at least 10 years ago. We were in Times Square and had a coffee at the old Howard Johnson. I had this idea of setting something in the ballet world. It was very loose. I didn’t have a script. And then I found out she was fascinated by ballet and wanted to play a dancer. MTV: Was that when it was still that ballet/wrestling film? Aronofsky: No, that was after. I realized pretty quickly that taking two worlds like wrestling and ballet was much too much for one movie. So we met and for years it was something I’ve been developing and struggling with and when I finishing up “The Wrestler,” a guy who worked in my company, Mark Heyman, he had done a lot of writing and producing on “The Wrestler,” and I asked if he wanted to give the ballet project a shot. He jumped in and he turned it into something we could make. MTV: For Mila’s role, you needed someone who looks like Natalie, but obviously it can’t just be about looks. It’s got to be the right actor. How do you approach that sort of casting challenge? Aronofsky: Yeah, yeah, yeah. I saw “Forgetting Sarah Marshall,” and she just leapt off the screen. So natural and so beautiful. I’d never seen her TV show. So she was in my head, and then Natalie said, “Hey, for the part of Lilly, what about my friend Mila Kunis?” I was in Europe, and we met over iChat and she was natural and cool and seemed relaxed and excited and then I just hired her. It was a leap of faith. MTV: At Comic-Con, Natalie compared the movie to a psychological thriller like “Rosemary’s Baby.” Does that ring true for you? Aronofsky: I’m a huge Polanski fan. Probably “Repulsion” and “The Tenant” are better comparisons than “Rosemary’s Baby.” They were big influences on “Black Swan,” as they’ve been on all my films. Unfortunately for my checkbook, I don’t really make movies that can be put in a box. I don’t know what it is. It’s not like much out there. MTV: It definitely seems that it toes that line of, “Is this purely psychological? Does magical realism come into play?” Not that you’re going to tell me the answer, but were those ideas in your head? Aronofsky: It’s definitely an experience. But the trailer should give you everything — it’s all in there! No, no, it’s got a lot of sources that I get inspired by and influenced by. It’s like, “What the hell was ‘Pi’?” I’m not really sure. Definitely “The Fountain” was outside the box. I guess “The Wrestler” was the most straightforward thing I’ve done. I think I was trying to make a sports film. I guess I don’t do genre very well. MTV: You seem to be doing OK so far. Aronofsky: I don’t know. Everyone will see in a few days. MTV: Yeah, you’re opening the Venice Film Festival. Do you get nervous for stuff like that or are you cool, calm and collected? Aronofsky: I always get nervous when I show work to an audience. Eventually they’re going to have to see it. When “The Wrestler” showed at Venice the last time, I walked out in the middle. I couldn’t handle it. I snuck back in the end. It was not a pleasant experience. MTV: You’re staring at the people, going, “Are they liking it? Are they liking it?” Aronofsky: Unfortunately, I don’t make the kind of films where you can tell if they’re liking it. It’s not a laugh-fest. It’s a tough job. It’s a tough job. From the saucy Jessica Alba in “Little Fockers” to James Franco’s grueling journey in “127 Hours,” the MTV Movies team is delving into the hottest flicks of fall 2010. Check back daily for exclusive clips, photos and interviews with the films’ biggest stars. Check out everything we’ve got on “Black Swan.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos Exclusive Clips From The Fall’s Most Anticipated Films Related Photos Fall Movie 2010 Preview Week: Exclusive Photos

Read the original:
‘Black Swan’ Director Darren Aronofsky On Ballet, Natalie Portman And Lesbian Kisses

Imam to FBI (2003): ‘U.S. Response to 9/11 Could Be Considered Jihad’

Defenders of controversial imam Feisal Abdul Rauf have been touting his past efforts in offering counterterrorism advice to the FBI as a way to illustrate his bridge-building intentions.  Much like other reports, they tend to gloss over the more controversial aspects of Rauf’s statements.  But, as is typical with the Ground Zero mosque imam, it can be demonstrated that he is frequently speaking with a forked tongue. There is no doubt that Rauf has made some questionable and incendiary comments regarding America and her role in the Muslim world.  Perhaps these statements fit the imam’s overall rhetoric involving U.S. complicity in the attacks of 9/11.  As does the following statement to the FBI , which is conveniently omitted from media reports defending Rauf. Bridge-building imam Feisal Abdul Rauf was giving a crash course in Islam for FBI agents in March of 2003 .  When asked to clarify such terminology as ‘jihad’ and ‘fatwa’, Rauf stated (emphasis mine throughout): “Jihad can mean holy war to extremists, but it means struggle to the average Muslim. Fatwah has been interpreted to mean a religious mandate approving violence, but is merely a recommendation by a religious leader.  Rauf noted that the U.S. response to the Sept. 11 attacks could be considered a jihad , and pointed out that a renowned Islamic scholar had issued a fatwah advising Muslims in the U.S. military it was okay to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan.” Well, wait a minute.  Which version of the word jihad is he referring to when he speaks of the U.S. response itself?  Is it the struggle he speaks of for the average Muslim, or is it the holy war?  Getting very little run in the media is an analysis of Rauf’s FBI days in the New York Post .  Contained within Paul Sperry’s column is a question of whether Rauf actually knows the definition of jihad, or if he simply presents things ambiguously to make things more difficult on the agents he is trying to teach.  While Rauf passes jihad off as nothing more than a struggle, Koranic scholar Abdullah Yusuf Ali disagrees, insisting that jihad ‘means advancing Islam, including by physically fighting Islam’s enemies.’ Sperry then questions, ‘If he (Rauf) believes jihad is really just an internal struggle, then why does he refuse to condemn Hamas? (Why, for that matter, did he in late 2001 suggest that “US policies were an accessory to the crime” of 9/11?).’ And speaking of the fatwa advising Muslims in the U.S. military that it was okay to fight the Taliban … The renowned Islamic scholar that Rauf is referring to is Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi.  In a New York Times article one month after 9/11, Rauf was quoted as saying: “This fatwa is very significant. Yusuf Qaradawi is probably the most well-known legal authority in the whole Muslim world today.” Question is, was that hollow fatwa (a hotwa as it were) more significant than Qaradawi’s proclamation on Al Jazeera two weeks earlier?  Qaradawi stated: “A Muslim is forbidden from entering into an alliance with a non-Muslim against another Muslim.”  He called on Muslims to “fight the American military if we can, and if we cannot, we should fight the U.S. economically and politically.” Qaradawi elaborated on that non-fatwa fatwa in 2004 when he said of American troops : “…all of the Americans in Iraq are combatants, there is no difference between civilians and soldiers , and one should fight them, since the American civilians came to Iraq in order to serve the occupation. The abduction and killing of Americans in Iraq is a [religious] obligation so as to cause them to leave Iraq immediately. The mutilation of corpses [however] is forbidden in Islam.” Abduction and killing is an obligation, but he draws the line at corpse mutilation.  Very classy. Perhaps the media should not be relying so heavily on the imam’s efforts within the FBI anyway.  Lest we forget, the FBI doesn’t exactly have a great track record in spotting red flags being raised by a radical imam.  Families of the victims at Fort Hood can attest to that.  In their defense, the FBI was constantly compromised by over-sensitivity training when it came to Muslims.  But when Nidal Hasan was chatting it up with Anwar al-Awlaki, they suspected it was nothing more than a simple case of psychiatric research. Is all this nothing more than parsing the double talk of a ‘moderate’ imam, or is it something more alarming? Rusty can be contacted through his website:  The Mental Recession .

Original post:
Imam to FBI (2003): ‘U.S. Response to 9/11 Could Be Considered Jihad’

ENDA is about men showering with women

Barney Frank: ENDA is about men showering with women Date: 8/27/2010 9:53:29 AM By Bryan Fischer “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:27, emphasis mine). According to both Scripture and biology, there are just two genders, two and only two, male and female. Period. Pro-family advocates have from the beginning opposed the normalizing of transgenderism because it does gross violence to any rational view of human sexuality, and, even worse, will force women to share shower, bathroom and locker-room facilities with biological males. Nonsense, we’ve been told by the deviancy cabal. All hype, fear, and exaggeration. Nothing to fear here except homophobia, move along. It’s all just fear-mongering, nothing like that will ever happen. Your daughter will never run into a disrobed male in the locker room of your local public pool. This is an ongoing battle in our day, at the state level as well as the congressional level. This spring, Maine very nearly enacted a policy that would require ENDA-type regulations in every school in the state, including private Christian schools. It was narrowly turned back. A major goal of the Democrats in the current Congress is to get a transvestite-friendly ENDA bill passed this year. No worries, they say. Pro-family opponents are just trying to scare you with all this bathroom and locker room talk. And then along comes Rep. Barney Frank, the homosexual congressman from Massachusetts, to inadvertently save the day. Democrats tried to pass ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) in 1999, and were under extreme pressure to include transgenders under its umbrella. Transgenders are people who are so psychologically and mentally confused they think they are trapped in a body of the wrong sex. So we are talking here about biological males – males in every single cell of their bodies, with every strand of DNA male to the core, males according to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” – who are convinced that they are women trapped in male bodies. Consequently, they want to act as women, dress as women, and use the same facilities women use, including bathrooms, showers, and locker rooms. The pro-family community has spoken with one voice. No, no, a thousand times no. We do not want our wives and daughters exposed to such perversion. We insist on a decent protection for the privacy of the females in our families, and do not believe that males have any moral, ethical or legal right to share shower facilities with them. In a long-buried piece from the homosexual newspaper, Bay Windows, dated June 10, 1999, Mr. Frank lets the proverbial cat out of the cathouse. In fending off transgendered activists, Frank told the paper it would be impossible to pass an ENDA bill which included special protections for such sexually abnormal individuals. Here’s what he had to say: “I’ve talked with transgender activists and what they want—and what we will be forced to defend—is for people with penis’ who identify as women to be able to shower with other women. There are no votes for that. And if that is the price for this bill, it is wrong.” (Emphasis mine) Read that again: ENDA, as currently fashioned, is about “people with penis’ who identify as women to be able to shower with other women.” Rep. Frank said since that’s what this bill is about, we’d have to defend that. They didn’t have the votes to do it in 1999. But they’re back, trying to break down the door to your daughter’s locker room in 2010. So if you want your daughter to share a shower at your school, or at the local YMCA, with “people with penis’,” then Barney Frank and his ruling class colleagues are the kind of congressmen you want. But if you want any kind of sane public policy on human sexuality, then they’re not. For my money, this is the ENDA the discussion about whether the Employment Non-Discrimination Act is good public policy. Let’s protect our wives and daughters and drive this misbegotten piece of legislation into oblivion. http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147497842 added by: ReverandG

Vaccine Zombie video www.VaccineZombie.com

Featuring an animated cast of dancing zombie characters, “Vaccine Zombie” is the latest hip hop single we've put together to feed your edutainment craving. Combining “entertainment” with “education”, this new video uses humorous song lyrics to explore the negative side effects of vaccines, which are now scientifically known to produce seizures, vomiting, fevers, narcolepsy and even death in children and teens. added by: treewolf39

Over 500,000 Attend Beck Rally, Yet the left Wing Press is Mum!

Conservative commentator Glenn Beck on Saturday drew a sea of activists to the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, where he championed a religious brand of patriotism and called on the nation to recommit itself to traditional values he said were hallmarks of its exceptional past. King's niece Alveda King, an anti-abortion activist, addressed Beck's rally with a plea for prayer “in the public squares of America and in our schools.” Referencing her “Uncle Martin,” King called for national unity by repeatedly declaring “I have a dream.” On the anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s “I Have a Dream” speech, steps away from where it was delivered, Beck and fellow “tea party” icon Sarah Palin staked a claim to King's legacy and to that of the Founding Fathers. They urged a crowd that stretched to the Washington Monument to concentrate on the nation's accomplishments rather than on its psychological scars. Rachel and Ray Thompson, both 29, drove with their four kids from Indiana. Both are fans of Glenn Beck and criticized President Obama for fanning the divisions in this nation. “He does have an awesome power to do something about it, but he is not. He is just sitting back,” said Rachel, a massage therapist. Neither was troubled by the timing of the rally — on the anniversary of King's “I Have a Dream” speech. They said the speech King's niece Alveda King gave was the most uplifting of the day. “There are a lot of divisive issues in this country that need to be addressed in the way Dr. King addressed them and [Obama] has failed to do that,” Ray Thompson, an electrician, said. “From a multi-racial family, I say shame on him.” (Ray is white; Rachel is African American.) added by: congoboy