Tag Archives: roberto-orci

‘Star Trek Into Darkness’: Benedict Cumberbatch’s Identity Revealed?

The release of the first issue of a three-part prequel comic to Star Trek Into Darkness   has lent some credence to the theory that the true villain of JJ Abram’s upcoming movie is not Khan or Gary Mitchell , but rather Robert April, the very first captain of the Starship Enterprise.   HitFix’s Drew McWeeny first raised the idea late last year after Abrams’ Bad Robot held a press day for the feature, which hits theaters in May, and now Brandon Connelly at Bleeding Cool has posted panels from the prequel comic which feature April. Star Trek Into Darkness screenwriter/producer Roberto Orci has said that the film’s will be a canon character, and April is. He was introduced in the animated Star Trek series that ran for 22 episodes in 1973 and ’74.  As McWeeny notes below, although Bad Robot has not confirmed that April figures in Star Trek Into Darkness ,  the plot of the animated episode that featured April appears to dovetail with aspects of the movie that have been revealed so far:  He first appeared in the animated series, and in the episode where he appeared, it was established that he was was the first Captain of the Enterprise, even before Pike.  He was much older in the episode, “The Counter-Clock Incident,” which you can watch right now if you have NetFlix Instant.  In that episode, everyone on the Enterprise starts to age backwards, and by the time they’re all kids, unable to fix the problem, only April and his wife are still old enough to figure out how to reverse the process.  April figuring out that mechanism for how to control aging and even reverse it could be an important part of the plot for “Star Trek Into Darkness.”  If you saw the first nine minutes of the film in front of ” The Hobbit ,” then you already know that the film opens with a London couple driving to the hospital where their daughter lies immobilized, and from the few shots we see of her, she appears to be aging too rapidly.  At the end of that scene, her father (Noel Clarke) steps outside for some air, and that’s when Cumberbatch shows up and tells him, “I can cure her.” As McWeeny points out in his post, Peter Weller , who’s also in STID could very well turn out to be April instead of Cumberbatch, who Abrams has chosen to identify simply as John Harrison . Whoever he turns out to be when the movie finally premieres, one thing is clear:  this whole who-is-Benedict-Cumberbatch? mystery is brilliant guerrilla marketing on Bad Robot’s part. Here’s the revealing comic panel that Bleeding Cool posted. It’s the final page of the first issue of Star Trek: Countdown to Darkness. [ HitFix , Bleeding Cool ] More on Star Trek Into Darkness :  ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’: Cumberbatch’s Identity, Carol Marcus, And A New ‘Trek’ Villain Theory Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.  

Read this article:
‘Star Trek Into Darkness’: Benedict Cumberbatch’s Identity Revealed?

Did Karl Urban Accidentally Reveal Star Trek 2’s New Villain?

Or is he just effing with us? While doing press for his upcoming Dredd , Karl Urban seemed to let slip the identity of Benedict Cumberbatch ‘s Star Trek 2 character. Was he telling the truth or not? Right now, there is evidence for both sides. First, some background. 1. J.J. Abrams ‘ own origin story is based around his grandfather gifting him with a “Mystery Box.” It is, therefore, wonderfully ironic that he should be the current quarterback of the entire Star Trek franchise, a massive shared universe whose rabid fans are obsessive, meticulous and savvy enough to translate Shakespeare into its made-up language. Excuse me, one of its made-up languages. As a result, we still don’t know the name of the villain in the forthcoming Star Trek sequel. 2. Many years ago it leaked that Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci had delivered a script wherein Gary Mitchell – Captain Kirk’s Starfleet Academy chum turned ESP-monster from the early Trek episode “Where No Man Has Gone Before” – would be the heavy. I personally heard this from a guy who was inside and had some intel. 3. The rumor goes that Abrams didn’t like this script and sent everyone back to the drawing board. A Gary Mitchell storyline in the “new universe” Star Trek comics (that only mouthbreathers like I read) appears, effectively “putting that story to use.” Then we started hearing that Khan Noonien Singh – you know, the guy from KHAAAAAAAN – was going to be the baddie. A casting offer to Benicio Del Toro seemed to confirm this – even though Khan is supposed to be a Sikh, not Hispanic, but only hardcore dweebs like to bring this up. 4. Benedict Cumberbatch (pictured above) is cast. He doesn’t look like a genetically enhanced poet-warrior. (But, really, who is to say?) It is accepted by most people that he is playing Khan. Then Simon Pegg says “ No Khan .” Fair enough. 5. Now today’s news. Karl Urban, in yapping about the upcoming Dredd , lets this slip to SFX : “[Benedict Cumberbatch’s] awesome, he’s a great addition, and I think his Gary Mitchell is going to be exemplary.” Wow, so it was Gary all along? Open and shut, right? But wait! 6. Just a few weeks back, Roberto Orci gave a list of Star Trek characters that are NOT in the film . Among them: Gary Mitchell. Here’s the thing. Normally, a gaffe from an actor during a press day is a great way to squeeze info out of someone. They are tired and they can’t remember what’s already out there and what is being held for strategic marketing reveals. (These are called SMRs in Hollywood.) (No they’re not, I just made that up.) However, I think Urban might be throwing a red herring on purpose. I had the good fortune to shmooze with the guy once – at the very genre-friendly Fantastic Fest in Austin. He was pitching Red , but we got to discussing Star Trek and “The Nrrd Life” in general and he struck me as someone who really got it. If ever there was a guy who’d be so on board to screw with the heads of fanboys, it’d be him. Luckily, Urban will be moderating the Masters of the Web panel at next week’s San Diego Comic-Con , and you can rest assured the online press (our own Jen Yamato among them) will put the screws to him. Personally, I think having Gary Mitchell is cooler than having Khan, but I’d prefer if the Trek brain trust were, you know, boldly going where no man had gone before. In a remake-happy culture, that may be too much to ask for. Anyway, here’s Captain Kirk and Gary Mitchell fighting on Delta Vega. Sally Kellerman and her creepy contact lenses can only look on. [ SFX ]

Go here to read the rest:
Did Karl Urban Accidentally Reveal Star Trek 2’s New Villain?

‘Star Trek 2’ Close To Locking In Director J.J. Abrams

Since finishing ‘Super 8,’ Abrams working on ‘Trek 2’ script. By Terri Schwartz JJ Abrams Photo: Getty Images Trekkies and J.J. Abrams fans alike can rejoice, for the “Super 8” director is at long last close to committing to helm “Star Trek 2.” Now that Abrams can no longer use his stock answer — “The truth is that my focus has been so much on finishing ‘Super 8’ ” — to avoid giving any “Star Trek 2” updates, Deadline has confirmed that he is working with the flick’s writers and is close to committing to direct the sequel to his hit “Star Trek” reboot. This must have been the “announcement” Abrams promised MTV News would be coming “soon” back at the “Super 8” premiere in June. But it also means that the film will miss its intended June 29, 2012, release date. That’s good news for “G.I. Joe: Cobra Rises,” though, which Deadline is calling “G.I. Joe: Retaliation.” The entertainment news site has learned that Paramount is planning on giving the June release date to the “G.I. Joe” sequel and slating “Star Trek 2” for either winter 2012 or summer 2013. Either way, Paramount has agreed to be ready to jump into production on the flick whenever Abrams is. Abrams is now sitting down with writers Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman to polish up the “Star Trek 2” script, which Deadline is guessing will begin production in January. MTV News caught up with Damon Lindelof at San Diego Comic-Con, where he chatted about the current status of the script. “There was a lot of work going on over the course of the last year between Bob [Orci] and Alex [Kurtzman] and I,” Lindelof said. “We generated, like, a 90-page half-script half-treatment based on some meetings that we’ve had with J.J. [Abrams]. Now that J.J. is finally finished with ‘Super 8,’ we’ve kind of, not thrown out that material, but we’re reworking a lot of it.” He added that the final product of the script will hopefully improve upon the sequel the same way “Batman Begins” improved upon “The Dark Knight.” ” ‘Trek 2’ has to be better than ‘Trek 1,’ ” Lindelof said. “It has to.” Check out everything we’ve got on “Star Trek 2.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

See more here:
‘Star Trek 2’ Close To Locking In Director J.J. Abrams

Talkback: Is 13 Months Enough Time to Make a Good Star Trek Sequel?

With J.J. Abrams not quite yet confirmed (but expected) to return to helm Star Trek 2 , which Paramount has already set for a June 29, 2012 release, Deadline does the math: That leaves 13 months to go from what Paramount currently has in hand — a 70 page outline, according to Roberto Orci — to fully delivered film. But is that truly enough time to finish scripting, prep, shoot, and edit a massive, effects-heavy summer action tent pole?

Go here to see the original:
Talkback: Is 13 Months Enough Time to Make a Good Star Trek Sequel?

Reese Witherspoon Says Kissing Water for Elephants Co-Star Robert Pattinson Was ‘Disgusting’

Millions of women (and men) would have slayed safari animals to share a love scene with Twilight sensation Robert Pattinson on the set of Water for Elephants. But in a big F-U to those fans, Pattinson’s co-star Reese Witherspoon has reportedly described at length how “disgusting” and “disappointing” the experience was for her.

Here is the original post:
Reese Witherspoon Says Kissing Water for Elephants Co-Star Robert Pattinson Was ‘Disgusting’

The Second Cowboys & Aliens Trailer: Now With More Fun, Aliens, and Olivia Wilde

For a summer blockbuster whose makers are trying to emphasize its seriousness, Cowboys & Aliens sure is shaping up to be a fun little dust-tinged ride through the alien-infested Wild West. Or is it the Wilde West, now that marketing materials are giving fans the sense that resident hottie Olivia Wilde is actually in this thing? Behold, the second full trailer for Jon Favreau’s Cowboys & Aliens , packed with more (partial) alien peeks, more action, naked Olivia Wilde AND shirtless Daniel Craig! Yes, there’s something for everyone.

Go here to see the original:
The Second Cowboys & Aliens Trailer: Now With More Fun, Aliens, and Olivia Wilde

Transformers 3 Screenwriters Still Apologizing For Transformers 2

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is akin to an $800 million grossing bad penny. The thing won’t go away ! Speaking to THR during a roundtable discussion of screenwriters responsible for the coming batch of summer blockbusters, Revenge of the Fallen scribes Ehren Kruger (who also wrote Transformers: Dark of the Moon ) and Roberto Orci were once again faced with answering for the derisible 2009 sequel.

Follow this link:
Transformers 3 Screenwriters Still Apologizing For Transformers 2

Will Alien-Free Marketing, Lack of 3D, and Tonal Ambiguity Make Cowboys & Aliens a Tough Sell?

When it comes to conventions, Jon Favreau is nothing if not a man of the nerd people. Mindful of how much he owes to the Comic-Con faithful for jump-starting early word of mouth on the Iron Man franchise, he came to San Francisco this weekend with a treat: Nine minutes of footage from Cowboys & Aliens cut exclusively for the WonderCon audience, including a special reveal of the film’s big, bad aliens — aliens that Favreau otherwise intends to keep under wraps.

See the original post:
Will Alien-Free Marketing, Lack of 3D, and Tonal Ambiguity Make Cowboys & Aliens a Tough Sell?

‘Hobbit Race War,’ and 7 Other Stories You’ll Be Talking About Today

Also in today’s edition of The Broadsheet: Jackass 3.5 is streaming your way soon… DreamWorks goes boy-hunting… John Waters kicks off list-season… Bad sex isn’t really bad sex… and more…

See the article here:
‘Hobbit Race War,’ and 7 Other Stories You’ll Be Talking About Today

What’s Real and What’s Imagined in NYT’s Stunning Product-Placement Survey?

On the front page of the New York Times today—for those of you still buying newspapers, it’s below the fold—an article hilariously titled “Before Hiring Actors, Filmmakers Cast Products” (online it appears with the more benign headline: “Branding Deals Come First in the Filmmaking Process”) tries to get to the bottom of all that pesky product placement appearing in movies these days. And while conspiracy theorists will be disappointed that it makes no mention of the Modern Family iPad episode , they’ll be the only ones. This thing reads like an Onion article as written by Michael Tolkin. Even the main focus, a lawyer who specializes in branding deals by the name of Jordan Yospe, feels conjured out of the deep recesses of a screenwriter’s mind. After the jump, play along and try to figure out which portions are real and which are fake. (Hint: Think real.)

Read more from the original source:
What’s Real and What’s Imagined in NYT’s Stunning Product-Placement Survey?