Tag Archives: chelsea-handler

Tyler Perry On Chelsea Handler: Kim Kardashian Role And Black Women Hating Him For It [Video]

Read more from the original source:
Tyler Perry On Chelsea Handler: Kim Kardashian Role And Black Women Hating Him For It [Video]

Jennifer Aniston Aggressively Hypes Her Nonexistent Nude Scene

Ok guys, get your rotten tomatoes ready, because this is just ridiculous. After reportedly insisting that producers cut her topless scene from her new movie Wanderlust , Jennifer Aniston has been going on a media blitz to promote the film. “So what”, you say? Here’s what: she will not shut up about how great her nude scene was . in an interview with Entertainment Tonight Canada , Jennifer says that ” ‘Liberating’ is a good word to use ” to describe the experience of shooting her topless scene, which she says ” fit the spirit of the movie .” Not only that, but she went on Chelsea Lately last night for an interview that skewed heavily towards discussing the nude scene that reportedly isn’t even in the film , including this infuriating statement by Chelsea Handler : “I’ve been lucky enough to see you topless in our private life, but now America, when they go to see the movie, will get to see her topless running!” Jen went on to say of her naked male co-stars, ” Finally, for once, the men have to disrobe! Trust me, there is your fair share of breasticles as well …” Breasticles? BREASTICLES?? Commence fruit-flinging…now!

Read the original here:
Jennifer Aniston Aggressively Hypes Her Nonexistent Nude Scene

‘This Means War’ Stars Debate Love Triangles

‘They make life more exciting,’ Chris Pine tells MTV News at premiere. By Kara Warner Tom Hardy, Reese Witherspoon and Chris Pine in “This Means War” Photo: 20th Century Fox Woe is the woman entangled in a complicated, messy love triangle — particularly one that involves easy-on-the-eyes actors Chris Pine (“Star Trek”) and Tom Hardy (“Warrior,” “Inception”). This is the dilemma Reese Witherspoon faces as lucky lady in love with two very-eligible CIA operatives in “This Means War,” released Friday (February 17). Hopefully, you can read our sarcasm, because we don’t feel any ounce of sympathy for Witherspoon, as she had the best of both worlds working on the film. There are, of course, pitfalls to real-life love triangles, so when MTV News hit up the premiere of the new action-filled romantic comedy, we asked the stars to debate the pros and cons of being caught between two eligible romantic interests. “I guess the pros of a love triangle is that they make life more exciting,” Pine offered. Abigail Spencer, who plays Hardy’s character’s ex-wife, said, “I think there’s only cons,” adding “I think the only pro is that you might discover who you actually like by having a distraction but it forces you to make a decision.” “I can’t even answer that question,” Hardy admitted. “I’m trying to think of too many literal answers.” Chelsea Handler, meanwhile, provided a thoughtful answer to our poll: “You get to have sex with two people simultaneously, but at some point, you have to tell the truth to both people so they’re OK with it, and then you have to pick one,” she said. “It should only happen for a myopic period of time.” “I wouldn’t know from any personal experiences,” Witherspoon chimed in. “But from the movie, I think it’s very complicated dating best friends.” The film’s director, McG, admitted to speaking from personal experience: “That’s difficult to ask because I’ve only been on the losing end of any love triangle I’ve been a part of because all of my friends are super good-looking.” Check out everything we’ve got on “This Means War.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV First: This Means War

Read more from the original source:
‘This Means War’ Stars Debate Love Triangles

REVIEW: Doomed This Means War Gives New Meaning to Counter-Intelligence

If men are from Mars and women from Venus, This Means War  drifts in cold, empty space somewhere between the two orbits, where, as the famous tagline goes, no one can hear you scream. The film, the first to be directed by McG since 2009’s  Terminator Salvation , is sort of an action movie with a rom-com twist, and sort of a screwball comedy with explosions and shootouts, but doesn’t commit enough in either direction to really please whichever half of the theoretical couples in the audience dragged their reluctant significant others along to the theater. Is this a movie about how the CIA’s greatest partnership is almost destroyed by competition for the affections of a winsome blonde from Atlanta, or is it one about how said blonde has to choose between two dashing men keeping some serious secrets, the least of which is that they know each other and are also acquainted with each other’s courtship plans? Bromance or romance,  This Means War  feels like something scrawled by enterprising teenagers who developed their concepts of love and espionage from films and TV shows they caught over a few weekends of basic cable surfing (Timothy Dowling, of  Role Models  and Just Go With It , and Simon Kinberg are credited for the screenplay). This leaves you with no option but to lay back and bask in the movie-star wattage of the cast, which is considerable and unexpected, and try not to pay attention to anything they’re actually doing or saying. Reese Witherspoon coasts through familiar territory as Lauren, a product tester who moved to Los Angeles for a guy (Warren Christie), broke things off after catching him cheating, then buried herself in her work rather than trying to move on to someone new. I like her far more as an actress when she manages to get away from the usual sorority-girl-with-a-spine-of-steel, but she does bubble away earnestly here, lecturing herself in the mirror about being “a confident woman” and dancing in her undies to “This Is How We Do It.” In a less comfortable role is Tom Hardy, playing the a very different breed of cinematic spy than he did in his last onscreen appearance as Ricki Tarr in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy (though both characters have scenes in which their ladyfriends drive them around in a convertible). Hardy’s still immensely watchable as Tuck, but he seems aware that he’s a awkward fit for a light romp of a film, especially as the sweet and sensitive point of the love triangle — he looks more likely to steal a kiss after mugging you than mood-light his chic loft with candles. He does loosen up as the film goes along, but he’s more lively hazing his bestie/rival FDR Foster (Chris Pine) than wooing Lauren with dates to the Santa Monica Pier and paintball range. Pine hasn’t had a chance to take many roles between Star Trek s, and he’s proves himself to be just fine as a smarmy eterna-bachelor whose chosen target for something more serious turns out, unfortunately, to be the girl Tuck just went on an Internet date with. Unlike Hardy, he knows better than to bother searching for any sincere emotion in FDR, who may not be Lauren’s favorite (let me never be accused of spoilage) but is certainly the director’s. In the film’s peculiar conception of the CIA, there’s seems to be a lot more assassination going on than the secretive gathering of intelligence (and no one explains why a Brit is working there). After a supposedly covert opp dissolves into a rooftop firefight with a helicopter swirling money into the air and a body plummeting off a highrise, FDR and Tuck are grounded by their boss (Angela Bassett, given nothing to do), which explains why they have so much time to misuse Company resources to research Lauren and, after they agree to let her choose between then, monitor each other’s outings. When This Means War  finally works itself around to this spy/dating overlap, it’s a cute joke that’s too quickly run into the ground — Tuck sniping FDR with a tranquilizer to prevent him from sealing the deal with Lauren is funny, the two men listening in on her conversation about them with her best friend Trish (Chelsea Handler, painful) gets weird, a room full of surveillance guys watching her have sex is really creepy. The action subplot, which deals with a baddie played by Til Schweiger who’s out seeking revenge or something, is nonsensical and, worse, shot and edited that way — fight scenes are chopped up beyond recognition, choreography impossible to follow. The film’s two worlds come together in a sequence that manages to be disappointing both in terms of stunt-work and in terms of resolving its romantic conflict, in a thrill-less car chase. But while  This Means War  doesn’t aim high in terms of its own ambitions (it makes Mr. & Mrs. Smith and  True Lies look like works of astounding genius), it doesn’t shy away from referencing the greats. A lecture Lauren gives on why The Lady Vanishes is lesser Hitchcock doesn’t seem in character, but at least it’s not the eye-roller that is the later nod to The Godfather  in a nightclub scene. That’s a bold choice for an homage in any film, but particularly in one that repeatedly queues up “Me So Horny” as a joke whenever it cuts to Trish spending quality time with her chubby husband at home. Follow Alison Willmore on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Original post:
REVIEW: Doomed This Means War Gives New Meaning to Counter-Intelligence

Houston, We Have A Problem… Again! Whitney Leaves Hollyweird Nightclub Lookin’ CRAY

Crack is wack. We’re not saying no names, but somebody needs to go back to rehab. Bad. Whitney Houston was spotted leaving Tru Hollywood Nightclub last night looking a hot mess. We’ve got the snapshots and you definitely need to see them. She got the booty-do on blast, blood dripping down her leg and she was clearly cussing folks out. See what we mean? More disturbing shots when you continue

Visit link:
Houston, We Have A Problem… Again! Whitney Leaves Hollyweird Nightclub Lookin’ CRAY

Galleries: Mary J. Blige, Chelsea Handler, Forest Whitaker, Melody Thorton And More Do Belvedere RED Pre-Grammy Party

Link:
Galleries: Mary J. Blige, Chelsea Handler, Forest Whitaker, Melody Thorton And More Do Belvedere RED Pre-Grammy Party

Mariah & Jermaine Dupri Reunite In The Studio!

View post:

Mariah Carey and Jermaine Dupri are in the studio continuing to work on new music for her forthcoming album! “I said MC they don’t expect you to be camera ready,she said Yes they do LOL!!” tweeted Mariah, along with this image of her and friend Jermaine. Mimi always looks fabulous, especially being that she gave birth to twins less than a year ago! Mariah Carey Back In The Studio With Jermaine Dupri! [PHOTOS] Chelsea Handler: “There’s Nothing Real About Mariah Carey”

Mariah & Jermaine Dupri Reunite In The Studio!

Mariah & Jermaine Dupri Reunite In The Studio!

Here is the original post:

Mariah Carey and Jermaine Dupri are in the studio continuing to work on new music for her forthcoming album! “I said MC they don’t expect you to be camera ready,she said Yes they do LOL!!” tweeted Mariah, along with this image of her and friend Jermaine. Mimi always looks fabulous, especially being that she gave birth to twins less than a year ago! Mariah Carey Back In The Studio With Jermaine Dupri! [PHOTOS] Chelsea Handler: “There’s Nothing Real About Mariah Carey”

Mariah & Jermaine Dupri Reunite In The Studio!

Reese Witherspoon Opens Up About Acting In 1991 MTV Interview

Check out the vintage clip in advance of Tuesday’s ‘MTV First: Reese Witherspoon.’ By Jocelyn Vena Reese Witherspoon in 1991 Photo: MTV News Reese Witherspoon is slated to sit down with MTV News on Tuesday for an exclusive interview and premiere of a previously unseen clip from her upcoming film “This Means War.” The special, “MTV First: Reese Witherspoon,” will air on January 31 at 7:56 p.m. ET on MTV. But before we look to the future, we are going to take a peep at her past. MTV News has uncovered a precious vintage gem, a 1991 interview with the then up-and-comer. “Ever since I was 7,” the already precocious and sassy rookie told MTV News when asked whether she had always had her sights set on a career in Hollywood. “I just thought, I always wanted to do something really outgoing ’cause when I was little I was really kind of quiet, but you know, I’d always be really creative at home and stuff, and finally I started, you know, speaking out and doing little things to impress everybody.” She further explained that once she had decided that acting was something she wanted to do, she took the necessary steps to make sure she’d be ready for fame and stardom. “I started taking little acting classes and improv classes and, you know, [that] turned out to be what I was going to do,” she said. “I was always going to do something really out there, really far away. Does that make any sense? No, not really.” Later mocking herself and her answer, she teased, “That’s nice, Reese. That’s real nice.” Following the on-air “First” segment, Academy Award winner Witherspoon will stay for an additional 30-minute interview on MTV.com with MTV News’ Josh Horowitz. Fans can be part of the action right away by submitting video or text questions starting Monday on MTV.com or via Twitter by using the @MTVNews hashtag #MTVFirst. “This Means War,” the McG-directed comedy-action film, stars Witherspoon as a seductive female dating two of the world’s deadliest CIA operatives (played by Chris Pine and Tom Hardy), whose partnership and friendship are put in jeopardy when they begin to battle for her affections. Instead of talking to her about the love triangle, they try to settle the matter using all of the weapons at their disposal. The film also stars one of Witherspoon’s real-life pals, comedian and “Chelsea Lately” host Chelsea Handler, who gives Reese’s character the terrible advice that she should continue dating both men. Check out everything we’ve got on “This Means War.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

View original post here:
Reese Witherspoon Opens Up About Acting In 1991 MTV Interview

Feud Alert: Joan Rivers Calls Chelsea Handler a Drunk Whore

Joan Rivers and Chelsea Handler are in a major feud and Howard Stern is caught in the middle, having hosted the women on his radio show in successive days. Yesterday, in the same interview in which she recalled dumping 50 Cent , Handler was reflecting on her ongoing feud with Rivers. Chelsea’s take, in a nutshell: “What the f**k do I care about Joan Rivers? I don’t think about her ever.” Joan Rivers on Howard Stern According to Joan, the discord began which she claims Chelsea ignored her efforts to say hello at an E! function and was outright rude to her and her daughter. Handler claims Rivers started the feud by making harsh remarks about her in a speech for no reason, unprovoked. It’s unclear what she said allegedly. In any case, Joan appeared on Stern’s Sirius XM show Tuesday morning with daughter Melissa Rivers and went off on Handler, calling her unfunny and worse. Specifically, she alluded to Chelsea’s relationship with E! CEO Ted Harbert. “Number one, the girl made it on her back f**king the president, we all know that, of the network. Number two, she’s fine, she’s ordinary,” Rivers told Stern. “She’s not a genius,” Joan said. “She’s an ordinary girl that was f**king somebody high up in the industry and they gave her a break and she’s doing okay.” “Whatever she is, she’s a drunk. I don’t wish her good luck, I don’t wish her bad luck. I don’t think she’s funny. But don’t you come after me, you wh*re!” Are you Team Joan or Team Chelsea?

Link:
Feud Alert: Joan Rivers Calls Chelsea Handler a Drunk Whore