Tag Archives: critics

Mila Kunis’ Tightly Packed Booty

Here’s Mila Kiunis’ cute little booty packed into some tight as jeans the other day. I love it. I want to take a bite out of that thing. I’ve also got a few shots of her posing with a car. I don’t know what that’s all about. It looks like she working at a car show or something. Is her career really all that bad? She does the Family Guy voice and…. Well that’s all I can think of right now, but it’s got to be better than this. Poor thing. I’m in the market for a sexy maid if she’s interested. more pictures from of Mila Kunis here

Elizabeth Olsen Is Kind Of A Hot Piece

This Elizabeth Olsen chick has not only got the critics attention for that movie she’s in that I can’t remember the name of, but she’s got my attention because she’s pretty damn sexy. So sexy that I wish she was the one with the twin, her sisters had a good run, but never lived up to expectations. Anyhow, here she is all tarted up at some party last night in what looks like a sexy Dracula costume. Hot.

Ricky Gervais on Golden Globes Bubble, and 6 Other Stories You’ll Be Talking About Today

Happy Tuesday! Also in today’s edition of The Broadsheet: Channing Tatum is the latest subject of Man From U.N.C.L.E. rumors… Felicity Jones will Hughes it up with Warren Beatty… We’re exporting Meryl Streep and Joel Coen to China… and more.

See more here:
Ricky Gervais on Golden Globes Bubble, and 6 Other Stories You’ll Be Talking About Today

And Now a Final Word About Jack and Jill

Glenn Kenny didn’t quite make the cut in last week’s scathing critical responses to Jack and Jill , but his withering postscript deserves a look: “One thing I did not get into in my review of Jack and Jill for MSN Movies was just how (ostensibly) insultingly sub-pro forma is its actual filmmaking. It isn’t even just a matter of how obviously its indifferent redemption-narrative structure is the Avid-enabled equivalent of a very sloppy butter sculpture. The indifference is felt in almost every aspect [… T]his is the first time it really hit home for me just how mindful Sandler, director Dennis Dugan, and the rest of the perpetrators are with respect to keeping overhead down. Good lord.” [ Some Came Running ]

Go here to see the original:
And Now a Final Word About Jack and Jill

24 Movie Almost Has a Script, and 5 Other Stories You’ll be talking About Today

Happy Tuesday! Also in today’s edition of The Broadsheet: Warner Bros. wants a Leonardo DiCaprio franchise… David Cronenberg has The Fly and Eastern Promises sequels on the brain… Fox fires back at those litigious Black Swan interns… Are you ready for some football nonsensical racist celebrity spewage?… and more.

Read more here:
24 Movie Almost Has a Script, and 5 Other Stories You’ll be talking About Today

Nick Swardson to Bucky Larson Critics: Drop Dead

Porn-star guest critics notwithstanding: “It’s a lot of work and a lot of reviewers aren’t going into that movie to like it. They don’t want to like it. None of those reviewers was psyched to see Bucky Larson and laugh. They go in with the mentality, fuck these guys for making another movie. They go in there to kind of headhunt. It makes me laugh because it’s just so embarrassing. It makes them look like such morons. You can’t review Avatar then review Bucky Larson . Comedy is so subjective, you know what I mean? To sit there and technically pick it apart is so stupid. We’ve never made movies for critics, so we could give a fuck.” Clearly. [ Splitsider ]

Continue reading here:
Nick Swardson to Bucky Larson Critics: Drop Dead

‘Scream 4’: The Reviews Are In

The latest installment of Wes Craven’s slasher-flick franchise ‘just might be the bloodiest of them all,’ writes to one reviewer. By Eric Ditzian Neve Campbell in “Scream 4” Photo: Weinstein Co. If the critics are to be believed, “Scream 4” comes closer to recapturing the horror franchise’s bloody and ironic glory than anything else we’ve seen in nearly 15 years. Unlike the first two films (the original in 1996, the second in 1997), overall reactions to 2000’s “Scream 3” were neatly summed up by one Entertainment Weekly reviewer who said that “the only thing the movie kills with any decisiveness is your time.” By contrast, the critics have been relatively kind to “Scream 4,” often praising its twisty plot and welcome humor, though occasionally lamenting over its tired premise. For those critiques and more, read on for what the pros are saying about the new Wes Craven film. The Story “[T]he story premise is neat: Having published a self-help book about how she has, as Oprah might say, moved on after outwitting every previous Ghostface who ever lunged her way, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell, looking uncommonly lovely) returns to promote her tome in her hometown of Woodsboro. Old Screamers Dewey-the-cop (David Arquette) and Gale-the-journalist (Courteney Cox), now married, are there to greet her. So is Sidney’s teenage niece, Jill (Emma Roberts). And so, conveniently, is Jill’s collection of glossy friends and classmates, each ripe for slaughter, or at least struggle, now that Sidney’s back in town. Among the potential targets, Hayden Panettiere and Rory Culkin stand out as a snarky party girl and an avid movie geek. In her own corner of the frame, Alison Brie (‘Community,’ ‘Mad Men’) happily goes for the jugular as Sidney’s aggressive young book publicist.” — Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly The Scares “Craven made sure he continued to keep the franchise R-rated. ‘Scream 4’ just might be the bloodiest of them all. There are rooms covered in blood, intestines spilled out onto beds, knives being driven into people’s foreheads (this is so crazy amazing I can’t even begin to tell you), and much, much more. The film earns its stripes and the moniker of a ‘slasher’ film.” — Brad Miska, Blooding Disgusting The Pace “Individual scenes have passing energy and jokiness, even if nearly all of the latter is highly insular in the way it self-consciously references horror genre tropes and the series’ own history. But the narrative doesn’t build the way it should in a good suspense film; just as it seems that the climax has arrived in a big Stab-A-Thon night at which dozens of horror geeks have congregated to watch the series while Ghostface is on a new tear through town, the film downshifts as it prepares to string out the last series of murders as long as it can before the final revelations (not bad) about who’s behind the mask this time and why.” — Todd McCarthy, The Hollywood Reporter The Comparison “Like its predecessors, ‘Scream 4’ replaces the values of storytelling and suspense with the value of being in on the joke. Unfortunately, in the 11 years since ‘Scream 3,’ the joke has gotten pretty old … [T]he central conceit of the characters’ fates being determined by the ‘rules’ of horror movies feels irredeemably tired; a clever idea that was worth one movie. When a character comments on how meta everything is, the audience laughs, but why? Only because it’s been conditioned to, just as it’s been conditioned to think that the intellectual window dressing makes the ‘Scream’ movies something more than slasher films.” — Mike Hale, The New York Times The Final Word “Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson let us believe that [the killer] might be anybody (though, according to the rules of horror movies, obviously it isn’t the person you think it might be). But you don’t watch ‘Scream 4’ to solve a mystery, or to identify with believable characters or situations (just one example: there’s a scene set in a hospital that apparently has no medical personnel); you’ll watch it to see a horror movie that has a sense of humor about itself. For ‘Scream’ franchise fans, or for those who like their horror not too horrific, that’s enough.” — Moira Macdonald, The Seattle Times Are you planning to see “Scream 4” in the theaters? Let us know in the comments. Check out everything we’ve got on “Scream 4.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: ‘Scream 4’ Related Photos Scream 4 Scream 4: Red Carpet Arrivals

Read this article:
‘Scream 4’: The Reviews Are In

‘Just Go With It’: The Reviews Are In!

Adam Sandler fans will surely hit the theater whether critics are into it or not. By Eric Ditzian Jennifer Aniston and Adam Sandler in “Just Go With It” Photo: Sony Pictures Like the iPhone 4, Adam Sandler movies are basically review-proof. His comedies never engender the sort of critical praise that, say, Judd Apatow’s often do, yet crowds reliably show up to watch Sandler do his thing. So perhaps we shouldn’t pay much mind to the often harsh reviews that have greeted his latest laugher, the Jennifer Aniston-co-starring rom-com, “Just Go With It.” After all, even in the face of stiff competition from Justin Bieber’s “Never Say Never,” Sandler’s flick is expected to win the weekend’s box-office crown. Possibly, though, you want to know a little more about “Just Go With It” than whose face fills nearly every scene. In that case, read on to find out what the critics have to say! The Story “Sandler plays Danny, a plastic surgeon and schlub who marries a shrew but discovers post-divorce (and post-nose job) that the gold band is a magnet for bar chicks. That changes when he meets Palmer (the stunning Brooklyn Decker), which prompts him to shove the ring in his pocket to woo her beachside. Everything’s hunky-dory until Palmer discovers the ring in Danny’s pocket and naturally assumes he’s married. Here’s where the film takes its first characteristic step: Instead of explaining himself, Danny concocts a bizarre lie that he’s separated from his wife and close to a divorce. To maintain that lie, he persuades his assistant, Katherine (Aniston), to not only play his soon-to-be-ex-wife but to come with her two children to Hawaii to, well, make the movie feature length.” — Scott Bowles, USA Today The Look and the Laughs “[Director Dennis] Dugan constantly shoots their paid vacation and indeed the entire film like a commercial, and with the rampant product placement, it’s hard not to believe that’s the case. Cuts are sloppy, dialogue looping is obvious, and although they must’ve seemed fresh after every take on set, Sandler’s perpetual off-the-cuff name checks become a monotonous crutch in scene after scene. The man can’t resist ethnic stereotypes, plastic surgery mishaps, shots to the groin or sheep resuscitation gags (a moment any other film would’ve played off as something funnier said than shown), and the film runs nearly two hours for all its allegedly comedic indulgences.” — William Goss, Cinematical The Chemistry “[Aniston] has got expert comic timing when all those around her have none; she’s got lightness and finesse when everyone else is being indulgently silly. She plays like a grown-up; she looks fab. And she gets a real commitment out of Sandler — her performance makes him grow up, too. Amidst the wreckage of ‘Just Go With It,’ Aniston and Sandler have a real chemistry. They should go elsewhere with it.” — Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly The Dissenters “Adam Sandler’s Happy Madison production team has rarely put much stock in the rules of classical storytelling, but its newest project, ‘Just Go With It,’ manages to misfire in two seemingly incompatible directions. A puerile kiddie-comedy without the anarchic energy, and a schmaltzy romantic comedy without the sweetness, this Hawaii-set farce is too frantic and too lackadaisical a take on the oft-adapted French play ‘Cactus Flower.’ Working with longtime director Dennis Dugan, Sandler and the rest of the film’s marquee cast could nonetheless steer it toward good returns.” — Andrew Barker, Variety The Final Word “It had been one of the minor inducements to longevity, this crazy hope of one day actually seeing Jennifer Aniston in a good movie. That day arrives with ‘Just Go With It,’ a very funny romantic comedy that nicely combines Adam Sandler’s acerbic sweetness with Aniston’s down-to-earth warmth — and that finds an excuse for Aniston to both play an average person and yet dress like a movie star. The screenplay has a setup that borders on farce, but the romantic heart of it is strong and expresses something unusual. It’s a movie about the romance of familiarity, about the satisfaction and spiritual necessity of actually knowing someone and being known. So much of movie romance is usually about the opposite of that, about going off into the unknown, about adventure in the form of, not physical danger, but emotional danger. ‘Just Go With It’ makes a feint in that direction, but not enough to fool anybody.” — Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle Check out everything we’ve got on “Just Go With It.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

Read the original here:
‘Just Go With It’: The Reviews Are In!

The 9 Most Scathing Critical Responses to Just Go With It

Adam Sandler, that patron saint of scathing critical responses , returns to the multiplex this weekend with bad review magnet Jennifer Aniston in Just Go With It , a romantic comedy about a plastic surgeon who lies about being married to sleep with younger women. As if the trailers or that premise didn’t warn you enough to stay away — shockingly, the film is based on the 1969 film Cactus Flower , co-starring Walter Matthau and Goldie Hawn, which itself was based on a French play — the nation’s best and brightest critical minds have come up with a variety of flowery ways to tell you to how much it sucks eggs. Click ahead for the nine best takedowns.

Read more:
The 9 Most Scathing Critical Responses to Just Go With It

Adam Dell Takes Padma Lakshmi to Court

Halle Berry is not the only beauty in a custody battle with an ex. Adam Dell, the ex-boyfriend of Top Chef judge Padma Lakshmi and the father of 11-month old Krishna, has filed documents in a Manhattan court that seek to make the former couple’s custody agreement official. Dell and Lakshmi had arranged a legal system-free deal that allowed the former to visit his daughter nine days per month, but that contract will be nullified when she turns a year old on February 20. With the relationship between the two having turned sour – partly, TMZ reports , over Dell’s hatred of his child’s name – the pair will now go to court to decide parental guidelines. Friends of the model/author says she feels “bullied” by her ex and fears this is Dell’s way of forcing her into a relationship with him.

Read more:
Adam Dell Takes Padma Lakshmi to Court