Tag Archives: nature

Boyle and Daldry, London’s Olympic double act

Filmmakers known for feelgood movies including Slumdog Millionaire and Billy Elliot put in charge of 2012 events Both are known for uplifting feelgood movies where the virtuous child gets what they deserve despite all the obstacles – whether it’s a chai wallah from the slums or a miner’s son who just wants to dance. So there was little surprise, but much cheer, when Danny Boyle and Stephen Daldry were today put in charge of London’s 2012 Olympic opening ceremony. Daldry, who directed Billy Elliot , will take overall creative charge of opening and closing ceremonies for both the Olympics and Paralympics while Boyle will be artistic director of the main Olympic opener. Boyle, an Oscar-winner for Slumdog Millionaire , called it “a fantastic responsibility.” He said: “When they offered me the job they said do you want to think about it overnight and I said ‘No, I want to do it and I’ll make tea if you want me to.’ “Just think about the games, where the four corners of the world come together and, yes, it’s very easy to be cynical about that, because there’s so much conflict in the world. But actually, it’s incredibly inspiring and you hope to capture some of that sense and also present a welcome, an open arms.” The budget for all four ceremonies is £40m, compared to the £70m China spent on its opening ceremony in 2008. “It’s a lot of money,” said Boyle. “It’s never enough money but it’s a lot of money and I hope we’ll spend it well.” Boyle said he would be thinking laterally. “We’ve got to acknowledge that it’s not going to be like Beijing where there was this overwhelming, intimidating scale. It will be more modest than that but our job is to make sure that, within our means, it is spectacular and that it delivers a thrilling welcome to the opening of the games.” Boyle was flanked by Daldry and Sebastian Coe, chairman of the London organising committee. All three insisted the economic climate would not affect the scale and ambition of the ceremony. “It is a welcome, a welcome to the athletes and a welcome to the world and the nature of that welcome needs to be as generous as we can be, both in spirit as well as cash,” said Daldry. Coe said the ceremonies budget had not been cut. “When we were bidding, we were bidding in probably the high water mark of the world economy but we were still doing so in a sustainable, responsible way. We haven’t suddenly reduced the scope of what we’re doing.” Boyle and Daldry will already have ideas, but they were revealing little yesterday. But Boyle – a local resident, having lived most of his adult life in Mile End – said possible themes were the joy of sport and pride in London. Also on his mind was that “in 2012 every single person in the stadium will probably have a camera phone, they’ll be filming their own versions of the ceremony”. Coe called the pair “the best of the best”, London mayor Boris Johnson hailed “a brilliant team” and Olympics secretary Jeremy Hunt predicted the events would “make Britain proud”. Others agreed. Paul Roseby, artistic director of the National Youth Theatre called them “an inspirational team”. He added: “It couldn’t be better. Let’s not forget it really is the greatest show on Earth and yes, comparisons will be made with China, but I think we have the opportunity now to surprise the world.” “Danny Boyle is a technician as well as an artist. Remember it’s a live ceremony but it’s also a film that will be seen on TV all over the world – it’s a big blockbuster movie, so you need someone like Danny.” Daldry said he had been looking back on previous Olympic ceremonies but would not reveal his favourites. It will be a surprise if pigeons are used, as they were in London’s last Olympic year – 1948. There have, though, been many memorable Olympic moments: the – at the time, astonishing – rocketman with jetpacks at Los Angeles in 1984 perhaps, or Kylie Minogue performing Dancing Queen at Sydney in 2000 . Best, perhaps, to not dwell too long on the 1936 opening ceremony in Berlin. The full creative team was unveiled at 3 Mills film studios, where 2012 production and rehearsals will take place. Daldry will be executive producer, creative, with three other executive producers. Mark Fisher, who has designed every Rolling Stones concert since 1989, will be in charge of design; Hamish Hamilton, an experienced director of live TV events, will be in charge of broadcast; and Catherine Ugwu, whose live events have included the Manchester commonwealth games closing ceremony and the Millennium Dome opening, will be executive producer, production. Before throwing himself full time into the Olympics, Boyle will finish editing his latest film, 127 Hours – which stars James Franco in the true story of mountaineer Aron Ralston who amputated his own arm when it became trapped under a boulder. This autumn, Boyle will make his debut at the National Theatre, directing a new version of Frankenstein. Until then he will work on the Olympics part-time. Olympic games 2012 Danny Boyle Stephen Daldry Sebastian Coe Olympics 2008 Mark Brown guardian.co.uk

See the original post here:
Boyle and Daldry, London’s Olympic double act

Tupac And Biggie Would Have Reconciled, Naughty By Nature’s Treach Says

Tupac’s close friend says ‘Pac and the Notorious B.I.G. ‘would have sat down’ and hashed out their issues. By Mawuse Ziegbe Naughty by Nature’s Treach Photo: MTV News The purported rivalry between hip-hop camps on the East and West coasts came to a tragic end when hip-hop icons Tupac Shakur and Notorious B.I.G. were killed at the height of the hype. To fans and the media, ‘Pac and Big were figureheads of the hip-hop movements on their respective coasts and fierce adversaries. However, ‘Pac’s close friend and Naughty By Nature MC Treach maintains that both rappers were just homies caught up in some drama and that, given some time, they would have hashed it out. “It only needed some time before ‘Pac and Big would have sat down, period, ’cause they was boys before that,” Treach told MTV News’ Sway the day before what would have been Tupac’s 39th birthday . “They would have sat down.” Treach said the friction between the two stars stemmed from Tupac’s 1994 shooting in New York. Although ‘Pac didn’t think Biggie was behind the attack, the rapper did think the Brooklyn hip-hop heavyweight should have looked out for him. “He really thought when he got shot the first time, that … not Big set it up or anything, just Big didn’t tell him who did it,” Treach told MTV News. “In his heart, he was like, ‘The homie know who did it.’ ” Treach said B.I.G. simply tried to avoid the drama and wasn’t aiming to undermine his friend. “Biggie might have wanted to just stay out of it, like, ‘I don’t know nothing.’ [Tupac] was like, ‘Yo, man, just put your ear to the street. Let me know who hit me up.’ ” Treach also said Tupac had an idea who engineered the assault but was upset that people he felt were in his corner didn’t hook him up with any info. ” ‘Pac already was knowing. He was like, ‘I know who got me. I want to see who I can trust now,’ ” Treach said, adding that ‘Pac lost faith in a lot of people, not just Biggie. “Now he was on non-trust mode with [everybody], except a chosen few. He was like, ‘I don’t trust nobody.’ ” While ‘Pac was definitely riled by the shooting and what he perceived as betrayal by many of his peers, Treach said the heat from the East Coast/ West Coast rivalry didn’t actually phase the Cali star. “Naughty by Nature and Bad Boy was on tour together. I’m on the [phone] with ‘Pac regularly, talking to Suge [Knight] regularly. Puff and them, they wasn’t leaving the hotel, they wasn’t going to parties, it was secret service,” Treach said. While the Bad Boy stars were shaken up, Treach said Tupac wasn’t worried about the East Coast/ West Coast hype. “[‘Pac and Suge] was laughing, like, ‘We ain’t come looking for them. We damn sure wouldn’t come out there and mess y’all money up. They on tour with y’all.’ [They] wasn’t mad at me, like, ‘Oh, you on tour with them.’ None of what the media was portraying was true.” Treach said he feels the supposed feud didn’t originate with any actual hip-hop beef, but instead was a product of media sensationalism. “I knew it was gonna be some real serious consequences when I saw the Vibe magazine cover, and it was Puffy and Biggie on it, and the title on it was ‘East vs. West.’ I said, ‘Somebody gonna die.’ That murdered the game right there. Just that cover being out there and that sh– put on the stands. Because now you got n—as in the ‘hood, like, ‘Oh, it’s on?’ They don’t got sh– to live for. They bang for a living. ‘Oh, let me see one of them n—as out here. It’s on.’ ” Do you think Tupac and Biggie would have mended fences by now if they were both alive? Let us know in the comments. Related Artists Naughty By Nature Tupac Shakur Notorious B.I.G.

See the original post here:
Tupac And Biggie Would Have Reconciled, Naughty By Nature’s Treach Says

Al Gore Accused of Affair with Laurie David

Have former Vice President Al Gore and Laurie David, ex-wife of Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm creator Larry David, been having an affair for the last two years? That’s the allegation of a prominent celebrity gossip tabloid. Al Gore split from wife Tipper after 40 years of marriage earlier this month, news that shocked to a public who largely viewed the Gore union as an ideal marriage. There were very few details, rumored or confirmed, about the nature of the split. Until today, when Star said that Al Gore and Laurie David are sleeping together. Tipper and Al Gore with Larry and Laurie David . Al has supposedly been having an affair with Laurie, who divorced Larry David in 2007 amid reports she slept with the caretaker of their Martha’s Vineyard home. No additional information, such as whether Tipper found out about the split, or whether it’s actually true, is available at this time. But an insider did tell Star: “Al and Laurie went from friends to lovers. It couldn’t be avoided.” Really, Star insider? It was inevitable? There was no deliberation at all? Michelle McGee would agree with that take. Al’s just doing what guys do, right? Yeesh.

Continue reading here:
Al Gore Accused of Affair with Laurie David

New Report: 472 Million People Worldwide Negatively Affected by Dams

Photo via Sandy Austin In the first ever global analysis of how dams impact food security and livelihoods, The Nature Conservancy and partners found that at least 472 million people have experienced the downside of dams. The new study goes beyond the displacement of people by new dam projects and into how communities living downstream from dams are negatively impacted by the changed water patterns, blocked movements of fish, floodplain grazing and other effects. Some of the findings are startling. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Continued here:
New Report: 472 Million People Worldwide Negatively Affected by Dams

Shocking New Report: The CIA Performed Human Experiments on Prisoners Under Bush

Over the last year there have been an increasing number of accounts suggesting that, along with the CIA's “enhanced interrogation” torture program, there was a related program experimenting with and researching the application of the torture. For example, in the seven paragraphs released by a British court summarizing observations by British counterintelligence agents of the treatment of Binyan Mohamed by the CIA, the first two of these paragraphs these paragraphs stated: It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2002 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer…. BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. The effects of the sleep deprivation were carefully observed. [emphasis added] The suggestion was that a new strategy was being tested and the results carefully examined. Several detainees have provided similar accounts, expressing their belief that their interrogations were being carefully studied, apparently so that the techniques could be modified based on the results. Such research would violate established laws and ethical rules governing research. Since Nazi doctors who experimented upon prisoners in the concentration camps were put on trial at Nuremberg, the U.S. and other countries have moved toward a high ethical standard for research on people. All but the most innocuous research requires the informed consent of those studied. Further, all research on people is subject to review by independent research ethics committees, known as Institutional Review Boards or IRBs. In the U.S., there was a major push toward more stringent research ethics when the existence of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was publicly revealed in the early 1970s. In that study nearly 400 poor rural African-American men were denied existing treatment for their syphilis, and indeed, were never told they had syphilis by participating doctors. The study by the U.S. Public Health Service was intended to continue until the last of these men died of syphilis. When the study became public the resulting outcry helped cement evolving ethical standards mandating informed consent for any research with even a possibility of causing harm. These rules were codified in what has become known as the Common Rule, which applies to nearly all federally-funded research, including all research by the CIA. Experiments in Torture A new report of which I am a coauthor, Experiments in Torture: Evidence of Human Subject Research and Experimentation in the “Enhanced” Interrogation Program, just released by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) confirms previous suspicions and provides the first strong evidence that the CIA was indeed engaged in illegal and unethical research on detainees in its custody. The report, the result of six months of detailed work, analyzes now-public documents, including the “torture memos” from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel and the CIA's Inspector General Report and the accompanying CIA Office of Medical Services (OMS) guidelines for monitoring of detainees. The report points to several instances where medical personnel — physicians and psychologists — monitored the detailed administration of torture techniques and the effects upon those being abused. The resultant knowledge was then used both as a legal rationale for the use of the techniques and to refine these abusive techniques, allegedly in order to make them safer. For example, the OMS guidelines contain this note emphasizing how important it is “that every application of the waterboard be thoroughly documented” by medical personnel, and clarifying the nature of this documentation: “how long each application (and the entire procedure) lasted, how much water was applied (realizing that much splashes off), how exactly the water was applied, if a seal was achieved, if the naso- or oropharynx was filled, what sort of volume was expelled, how long was the break between applications, and how the subject looked between each treatment.” This type of documentation was not part of routine medical care as it was not being done in the interests of the person being waterboarded. Rather, the OMS made clear that this was being done “[i]n order to best inform future medical judgments and recommendations” [regarding how to torture people.] The purpose of this systematic monitoring was to modify how these techniques were implemented, that is, to develop generalizable knowledge to be utilized in the future. As Ren

Can Audubon’s "Frozen Zoo" Save Endangered Species?

Audubon retrieves oil-coated turtle from NOAA. Photo: Audubon Nature Institute With the recent declaration of the rusty grebe extinction , due to a non-native carnivorous snakehead murrel being introduced to its habitat, Lake Alaotra in Madagascar, as well as drowning in nylon fishing nets, there’s no chance of resurrecting it. Unlike Cuba’s Zapata rail, which is critically endangered by the mongoose and catfish – not as long as the Audubon Species … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read the original here:
Can Audubon’s "Frozen Zoo" Save Endangered Species?

Drake Says He’s ‘Good’ After Thank Me Later Leaks

‘Just allow it to be the soundtrack to your summer and ENJOY!’ MC tweets of album, out June 15. By Shaheem Reid Drake Photo: Jason Merritt/ Getty Images It was inevitable. Drake ‘s Thank Me Later leaked to the Internet on Tuesday night, but the Toronto MC isn’t sweating it too hard. “I gave away free music for years so we’re good over here,” Drake tweeted . “Just allow it to be the soundtrack to your summer and ENJOY! JUNE 15th!” Just as he’d told MTV News months ago, “Fireworks” with Alicia Keys opens his first full-length album. Drizzy is candid from the start, rhyming about Rihanna, sharing his hope that his relationship with Lil Wayne never sours due to success and admitting his insecurity about adjusting to fame. “Fireworks,” “Light Up” (featuring Jay-Z) and “Miss Me” with Lil Wayne had all leaked long before this week. The new leak introduces fans to Drake’s second Thank Me Later collaboration with Kanye West (Ye also produced the single “Find Your Love”), “Show Me a Good Time.” Much like another cut on the LP, “Fancy” with T.I. and Swizz Beatz, “Show Me a Good Time” is that fun, summertime, mid-tempo dance record that the women will adore. It starts with some frantic sampled yells, but Drizzy comes in and smoothes out the situation with his voice. “How did I end up here with you?” he sings on the chorus. “After all the things I’ve been through/ It’s been one of those days/ You try to forget about it/ Take a shot and let it out.” And seconds later, he urges, “Show me a good time.” Later in the song, Drake raps about the Wu-Tang Clan and compares himself to the late, great O.D.B. He goes on to tell the lady in the song he wants to “kick it” with her like A Tribe Called Quest. Then he reflects on the haters. “People really hate it when a backpack rapper gets rich and starts living that life, dawg/ It feels like when you get into that paper, hip-hop hates ya/ They would do it just like I do if they could; it’s in our nature,” he proclaims in rhyme. The verse ends with Drake declaring that he’s made it. The very next record, the Nicki Minaj-featured “Up All Night,” has a darker sound, but the rhymes stay B-boy boastful as Drake celebrates his success. In true hip-hop form, he’s not shy about basking in his own accolades. “Shout out to the fact that I’m the youngest n—a doing it,” says Drake, who also affirms he has the game “in his pocket.” Nicki comes in on the second verse and the lyrical assault doesn’t let up. “Which bitch you know made a mil off a mixtape?” she asks, keeping the animation in her rhyme to a minimum and instead levying insults to her adversaries. “We got the hawks, and I ain’t talking about the Peach State.” Noah “40” Shebib, Boi-1nda, Tone Mason, Omen and Timbaland are the other producers on the album. Do you think the leak will hurt the success of Drake’s Thank Me Later ? Are you waiting for the actual release? Talk about it in the comments. Related Artists Drake

Read more here:
Drake Says He’s ‘Good’ After Thank Me Later Leaks

Vomit! Nudity! Litter! Marina Abramovic’s Marathon Performance Ends In Chaos [Art]

Marina Abramovic ‘s weeks-long performance art piece ends today . It raised important questions about the nature of art. They will probably never be answered. What’s certain, though, is that an audience member made themselves vomit, and another stripped nude today. More

“AWOL Bush” NY Times Coverup Revealed, President “Runs Away” During Vietnam War : Veterans Today

FLASHBACK: When the NY Times ignored gaping holes in candidate Bush’s war record May 25, 2010 2:10 pm ET by Eric Boehlert One of the striking talking points that came out of The New York Times in the wake of its controversial article last week about whether Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal had, over the years, exaggerated his military service during the Vietnam War era, was the insistence from the Times that the story was a deeply important one and one that needed to be covered. The Times, faced with stiff criticism for its handling of the Blumenthal story, seemed to suggest it had a moral obligation, not to mention a newsroom duty, to look closely at the military service rhetoric from a New England politician running in a statewide election. A Times flack even appeared to lecture Blumenthal about how he needed to be straight with Nutmeg State voters. But I’m having a tough time buying the Times‘ sudden devotion to the topic, considering that during the 2000 presidential campaign, the same Times staff went out of its way not to report on the web of detailed allegations that Republican George Bush had failed to fulfill his military obligation while defending Texas air space as an Air National Guard pilot and that the presidential candidate had routinely lied about that fact. For that story, the Times team shrugged. But it’s decided this spring to go all-in over Blumenthal? Seems strange. Now, I realize that it’s been an entire decade since the 2000 campaign played out and that most people don’t recall what the coverage was like — and specifically have virtually no memory of how Bush’s Air National Guard story was covered. But I’m not overstating things when I say the Times’ stubborn failure to cover the controversy really did mark one of the true cases of journalistic malpractice of that crucial campaign season. The full scope of Bush’s lack of Guard service was revealed on May 23, 2000, when The Boston Globe’s Walter Robinson reported a Page One piece detailing all the holes in Bush’s military service: “1-Year Gap in Bush’s Guard Duty; No Record of Airman at Drills in 1972-73.” After combing through 160 pages of military documents and interviewing Bush’s former commanders, Robinson reported how Bush’s flying career came to an abrupt and unexplained end in the spring of 1972 when Bush asked to be transferred so that he could work on a family friend’s Senate campaign in Alabama. But Bush’s Alabama commander, Lt. Col. William Turnipseed, told the Globe that Bush never showed up for duty. (A trained pilot, Bush asked to be reassigned to an Alabama base that had no airplanes.) In 2000, a group of veterans offered a $3,500 reward for anyone who could confirm Bush’s Alabama service — and nobody from Bush’s unit stepped forward. Consider this: The Times‘ Frank Bruni tailed Bush obsessively on the campaign trail that year, filing more than 200 dispatches. But he never once referenced in print the Globe allegations. (Just try to imagine the Times‘ reaction if, during the 2000 campaign, the same Boston Globe had reported on Page One that Gore’s discharge papers from Vietnam showed he rigged his wartime duty and orchestrated an early exit by simply refusing to report for duty during the final two years of his commitment.) During 2000, the Guard story never landed on Page One of the agenda-setting New York Times. In fact, the Guard story barely even made it inside the daily, while key facets were boycotted. Here’s how many times in 2000 the Times, supposedly busy scouring the backgrounds of the candidates, reported the fact that Bush was grounded by his Guard superiors in 1972 for failing a mandatory physical: zero. Just more than a week after The Boston Globe had raised serious questions about Bush’s Guard service, the Times ran a May 31, 2000, story headlined “Bush Questions Gore’s Fitness for Commander in Chief.” The article noted that some were “questioning the nature of Mr. Bush’s military service in the Vietnam War,” but did not provide any further detail about the substance of the criticism. Instead, the Times simply reported that “Mr. Bush did not serve overseas but instead served in Houston in the Texas Air National Guard.” The article made no mention whatsoever of the thorny allegations swirling about Bush’s lack of military service. On July 11, 2000, the Times‘ Nicholas Kristof wrote a biographical feature on Bush’s life during the Vietnam War: ” Close to Home; Bush’s Choice in War: Devoid of Passion or Anxiety.” The feature omitted any reference to questions about Bush’s absenteeism, getting grounded, failing to take a physical, and walking away from the Guard for months at a time. But Kristof was hardly alone at the Times. It was a determined team effort to play dumb. In late July, the Times got around to addressing Bush’s wartime experience with an article headlined “Governor Bush’s Journey; After Yale, Bush Ambled Amiably Into His Future.” Certainly a piece focusing on Bush’s post-Yale years in the late ’60s and early ’70s would center its attention on the troubling allegations raised by The Boston Globe, right? Wrong. It wasn’t until 2,500 words into the article that the thorny issue was detailed. In total, the Times article dedicated about 300 words to the entire controversy, giving readers the sketchiest outlines of Bush’s perplexing missing year from the Texas Air National Guard. And that fleeting, buried reference represented the bulk of the Times’ coverage for most the entire campaign. In a September 4 article on the campaign debate over military readiness, the Times referenced the fact that “Mr. Bush trained as a fighter pilot in the Texas National Guard during the Vietnam War.” The Times politely omitted any mention of Bush’s Guard controversy. Twenty days later, the Times reported, “An array of veterans, including senior officers who served under Mr. Clinton and Mr. Gore, last week endorsed Mr. Bush, who served as a fighter pilot in the Texas National Guard during the Vietnam War and was, for the record, a lieutenant.” Again, the article politely omitted any mention of Bush’s Guard controversy. It wasn’t until the eve of the election that the Times set aside an entire news article to examine some of the crucial questions raised by the Globe. The Times‘ conclusion in November 2000? See for yourself [emphasis added]: Two Democratic senators today called on Gov. George W. Bush to release his full military record to resolve doubts raised by a newspaper about whether he reported for required drills when he was in the Air National Guard in 1972 and 1973. That’s right, half a year after the Globe published its scoop, the Times finally addressed the issue, announcing in the second paragraph that some questions about Bush’s Guard service were “unfounded.” (“The Times got spun,” was how the Globe’s Walter Robinson later described the Times’ Guard reporting.) Bottom line: In 2000, candidate Bush’s military record during the Vietnam War was very much in doubt, as was Bush’s repeated explanation as to why, after receiving $1 million worth of taxpayer-funded flight instruction, he had essentially vanished from the Guard and failed to fly, show up for monthly drills, or even take a mandatory physical. Yet back in 2000,The New York Times didn’t seem to care much about that military-record story. And the Times newsroom seemed to make a decision not to cover the controversy — a controversy that, given the historically close nature of the 2000 race, could have tipped the balance of the vote. So, yes, given that stark background, it’s tough to make sense of the Times‘ recent dedication to pursuing the Blumenthal story. More at the link: added by: Monkey_Films

‘Lost’ In The Afterlife: Big Questions Answered In Series Finale

In typical ‘Lost’ fashion, some show mysteries remain open for debate. By Adam Rosenberg ‘Lost’ finale Photo: ABC After six seasons, one writers strike and countless unanswered questions, television sensation “Lost” has finally reached its conclusion. The story that began in 2004 with a plane crash and a tropical island received a fitting send-off from show-runners Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof in a two-and-a-half hour series finale. Mysteries remain, but major plot revelations in tonight’s episode offer a satisfying explanation as to exactly what happened to the passengers aboard Oceanic flight 815. Needless to say, spoilers ahead. Let’s get it out of the way right up front: The big twist is that everybody was dead. “Everybody” meaning the key players. Exactly who those players are remains open for debate, and will likely continue to be one of the show’s most enduring mysteries. An exchange between Jack and his father in the closing minutes of the finale reveals that a gathering of memory-restored Oceanic “survivors” have in fact been running through an elaborate fantasy, one designed to bring their group together before they step over to the afterlife. The major question that remains is when during the run of the show that break between life and death occurred. Life could have ended for the Oceanic passengers as far back as the pilot episode. The plane crashes, everybody dies, but this group is left behind because of unresolved issues within their individual lives. The trials they go through surviving on the island serve as a sort of purgatory. This would render certain key figures — Jacob, the Man in Black, Richard Alpert — as utter fabrications. That’s just one theory. Another read could put the time of death for Oceanic 815’s survivors as the hydrogen bomb blast at the end of the show’s fifth season, which raises a whole new set of questions as to the nature of certain supporting characters. The beauty of “Lost,” a trait that holds true even as it eases into its afterlife, is that the story demands discussion while remaining open to interpretation. Congratulations from MTV News to Carlton Cuse, Damon Lindelof, J.J. Abrams, and the talented cast and crew responsible for delivering six years of some of the most thought-provoking television on offer. “Lost” will be missed. What did you think of the “Lost” finale? Sound off in the comments! Related Photos Spin-Offs For The Characters Of ‘Lost’ The Sexiest Men Of ‘Lost’

Read this article:
‘Lost’ In The Afterlife: Big Questions Answered In Series Finale