Tag Archives: Nbc

Look Out Below: Nets’ Evening Newscasts Hit 2nd Straight Collective All-Time Low

How the once mighty have fallen. In the midst of covering the performance of the broadcast networks last week, David Bauder at the Associated Press noted the following (HT Kevin Alloca at Media Bistro ): Meanwhile, the NBC, ABC and CBS evening newscasts combined for a dubious record last week: the average of 18.7 million people who watched one of the three shows last week was the smallest audience those three telecasts have reached collectively on record, since the infancy of television, Nielsen said. During the slow news period of late August, the broadcasts broke their previous record — set just last week. Little did I know that my post last week (at NewsBusters ; at BizzyBlog ) also covered a negative record-breaker. The news actually got worse from there, Media Bistro’s Chris Ariens separately reported : And not a good sign from the younger viewer department — none of the shows broke the 2 million viewer average in the A25-54 demo. That’s the first time that’s ever happened. I don’t find the contention by the AP’s Bauder about the “slow news period of late August” very convincing. Political campaigns are already heating up, and family vacation season was mostly over, as the large majority of children were back in school last week. The networks’ collective performance was down almost 8% from a year ago for all viewers, and over 14% in the 25-54 demo. I think it’s more likely that more and more viewers and news consumers are tuning out because they agree with this sentiment . It will be interesting to see what if any kind of fall recovery there will be at the Big 3 networks’ evening newscasts. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Go here to read the rest:
Look Out Below: Nets’ Evening Newscasts Hit 2nd Straight Collective All-Time Low

NBC Developing ‘Harry Potter For Adults’

While Kelsey Grammer prays that NBC may be interested in Frasier: The Next Generation , the network is busy developing a much larger-scale project with the help of Battlestar Galactica creator Ronald D. Moore. The still-untitled drama is being described as “an adult Harry Potter set in a world ruled not by science but by magic,” and let’s just hope that no one asks Conan O’B rien for advice on what it should be called . [ Deadline ]

Read more:
NBC Developing ‘Harry Potter For Adults’

NBC’s Matt Lauer Repeatedly Presses Joe Biden on Iraq War: Was It Worth It?

NBC’s Matt Lauer wanted one question to stick in the minds of his Today show viewers, as from the top of Wednesday’s show, to his interview with Vice President Joe Biden, the Today co-anchor repeatedly asked was the Iraq war “worth it?” As part of the analysis of the President’s Oval Office speech last night, in which Barack Obama announced an end to U.S. combat operations in Iraq, Lauer invited on Biden, in the 7am half hour, to press him about the costs of the war as he asked: “There is a question being asked in homes all across the country this morning, after seven years and 4,400 lives and tens of thousands of U.S. servicemen and women wounded, some of them horrifically, and of course billions and billions of dollars spent, was Iraq worth it?” [ audio available here ] For his part Biden responded that since he had a son who served in Iraq for a year, “I could never say to any of those parents it’s not worth it” but that didn’t dissuade Lauer from pursuing his line of questioning, from the left, as he cited a New York Times editorial to the Vice President: I want to read you something from an editorial in this morning’s New York Times. Quote: “In many ways the war has made Americans less safe, creating a new organization of terrorists and diverting the nation’s military resources and political will from Afghanistan. Deprived of its main adversary, a strong Iraq, Iran was left freer to pursue its nuclear program to direct and finance extremist groups and meddle in Iraq.” Do you agree with that assessment? The following intro and full interview with Biden were aired on the September 1 Today show: [7:00am] BARACK OBAMA: Now it’s time to turn the page. MATT LAUER: Page turner. In a primetime Oval address President Obama announces the end of combat operations in Iraq. Was it worth it? Especially for the families who lost loved ones. This morning Vice President Joe Biden tackles that question. … [7:11am] MATT LAUER: Savannah Guthrie, thank you very much. Vice President Joe Biden is in Baghdad this morning. Mr. Vice President, good morning to you. JOE BIDEN: Good morning, Matt, how are you? LAUER: I’m fine, sir, thank you very much. There is a question being asked in homes all across the country this morning, after seven years and 4,400 lives and tens of thousands of U.S. servicemen and women wounded, some of them horrifically, and of course billions and billions of dollars spent, was Iraq worth it? How do you answer that question? BIDEN: My answer, Matt, is that all the sacrifices made by the American people, but particularly by our troops, we have to, in fact, make sure that this transition to the Iraqis works. We have to make sure that when we leave here, there is a stable government that is secure within its own borders, not a threat to its neighbors, in order to, to justify all that sacrifice that, that is taking place because the sacrifice is real. LAUER: Well so you’re saying if we don’t ensure the future, it may not have been worth it? In other words, at this stage, is it still unclear whether it’s worth it? BIDEN: Matt, having a son who served here for a year and feeling lucky he came home and thinking about all those parents who didn’t have their child come home, I could never say to any of those parents it’s not worth it. What I have to say is we are committed to making sure that the sacrifices they made bear fruit and the fruit will ultimately be in a stable Iraqi government that is able to stand on their own and, in fact, is not a threat to its neighbors nor threatened by its neighbors. LAUER: You said recently that Iraq now is safe. And you know there were some 50 people killed in insurgent attacks, in the days prior to your visit there. From my understanding, since you been there, on at least three occasions, alarms have sounded warning of incoming mortars. So to, to the families of the 50,000 U.S. troops that remain, now that combat troops are gone, are their loved ones safe? BIDEN: Look Matt, the level of violence is the lowest it’s been since 2003 when we got here. There are traffic jams in the street, there are people walking around and the vast majority of the country, there are, been no attacks. The fact of the matter is that there was an uptick in violence, 12 simultaneous attacks that, in fact took place a week or so ago, creating significantly less damage than any kind of coordinated attack has in the past. It’s still dangerous. But the fact of the matter is those 50,000 troops are well equipped, well protected and they’re in a position where they’re much, much, much safer than troops were a year ago, two years ago, and three years ago. As a matter of fact safer than any time since 2003. But there’s still, there’s still danger that exists in this country. LAUER: In his speech from the Oval Office last night, Mr. Vice President, the President referred to former President Bush and he said that while the two of them were at odds on this war from the very beginning, he said that no one could doubt Mr. Bush’s quote, “support for our troops or his love of country and commitment to our security.” I want to read you something from an editorial in this morning’s New York Times. Quote: “In many ways the war has made Americans less safe, creating a new organization of terrorists and diverting the nation’s military resources and political will from Afghanistan. Deprived of its main adversary, a strong Iraq, Iran was left freer to pursue its nuclear program to direct and finance extremist groups and meddle in Iraq.” Do you agree with that assessment? BIDEN: Well look all I’m gonna focus on today, Matt, is Iraq. The fact of the matter is, that, we are moving in a direction where the Iraqis are better positioned to be able to be successful, free and not a destabilizing force in the world but a positive force. And the question about whether or not credit is deserved, who deserves the credit for this beginning of a fundamental transition, I don’t think is worth arguing about. The truth of the matter is there were a lot of mistakes. There’s no doubt that the President and I both disagreed with the way in which the war had begun, how it was conducted, etc. But, but the truth of the matter is, that at, by the end of the last administration, a transition was in place, there was a political movement that was afoot. We kept on Secretary Gates, our present, we kept on General Petraeus, we kept on a continuity here to finish the job and that’s what we’re in the process of doing. LAUER: Vice President Joe Biden joining us from Baghdad, this morning. Mr. Vice President, I thank you for your time. BIDEN: Thanks an awful lot, Matt. I appreciate it.

Read more:
NBC’s Matt Lauer Repeatedly Presses Joe Biden on Iraq War: Was It Worth It?

Sandra Bullock — My Friends Don’t Sell Me Out

Filed under: Sandra Bullock , Jesse James , NBC , Today Show Sandra Bullock has finally revealed how she kept her adoption of baby Louis a secret for so long … she has friends who “know how to keep their mouth shut.” In her interview with Matt Lauer, Sandra said there are “good people with integrity” out there… Read more

Follow this link:
Sandra Bullock — My Friends Don’t Sell Me Out

NBC’s Engel Dumps On Iraq War, Claims Hussein Was Becoming More ‘Moderate’

On the day that the U.S. is ending combat operations in Iraq, the Today show, on Tuesday, brought on their chief foreign correspondent to essentially say the Iraq war wasn’t worth it. The noted anti-war reporter, when asked by Today co-anchor Ann Curry did, “Anything positive come from this war?” proceeded to dump on the entire mission as he relayed that Iraqis are upset that the United States “has failed to deliver on its promises,” claimed that Saddam Hussein, before the war, was “getting more moderate” and concluded that the mission was “a giant distraction of resources” and if not for the invasion of Iraq, the war in Afghanistan “would probably be over.” As the MRC’s Tim Graham pointed out in 2006 , Engel isn’t exactly the most objective analyst the Today show could’ve brought on to analyze the war, as he admitted to the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz that he thinks “war should be illegal” and he told him “I’m basically a pacifist.”  The following is the full exchange between Curry and Engel as it was aired on the August 31 Today show: ANN CURRY: NBC’s chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel has covered this war in Iraq since it began and also as it ended. Richard, good morning. RICHARD ENGEL: Good morning. CURRY: So keying off what Mr. Gibbs just said, what Iraq are we leaving its people to write its, their future with? ENGEL: Well, right now I think Iraq is in a very, very dangerous place. It’s very possible they will have another round of civil war. In the end of his comments right there you, he was talking about the political accord between Sunni, Shiites and Kurds that helped to bring some security gains. That accord is calling apart right now. CURRY: So how fragile on a scale of one to ten, ten being worst? ENGEL: Nine. CURRY: Nine? ENGEL: Yeah. I think it’s very fragile. I think if they don’t get a government in the next couple of months the, all of the gains from the surge could be wiped out. CURRY: Anything positive come from this war? ENGEL: Come from this war? Saddam Hussein is gone and any one, any Iraqi will tell you that. Saddam really was that bad. And every Iraqi suffered in that. And, but, but if you ask Iraqis what’s happened since then and they will complain that the political structure that was created in their country, by the United States, has failed to deliver on its promises to the people. CURRY: Meantime had the U.S. not invaded Iraq, where would Iraq be today? Where would the geopolitical situation be today? ENGEL: If there had been no invasion Saddam would still be in power. He was probably getting more moderate. He was being welcomed into the, into, by, by a lot of European countries, he was being welcomed in Eastern Europe in particular. He was heading in a, in a direction of accommodation. The, the sanctions regime that was holding in place was starting to fail. So I think he would, it would be somewhat of a basket case but it would still, it would be – Iran would be a lot more contained. So it would be a dictatorship that was trying to break out of its box but Iran would not be as dangerous as it is, as it is today. CURRY: And had the United States not invaded Iraq, would we be done in Afghanistan? ENGEL: Probably. That was a giant distraction of resources, of intelligence assets. That war would probably be over. CURRY: Richard Engel with perspective that’s very valuable on this war and many other stories. Thank you so much this morning.

See the original post:
NBC’s Engel Dumps On Iraq War, Claims Hussein Was Becoming More ‘Moderate’

Obama Defends His Support For Ground Zero Mosque

President Barack Obama sat down recently with NBC’s Brian Williams to reinforce his support for the Ground Zero mosque. He also took the time to blame the media for the initial misunderstanding of his comments when he first weighed in on the issue. Yet in the interview broadcast on August 29, there was no mention by the “Nightly News” anchor of how Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is at odds with Obama over the proposed location. For more information, check out this post on the Eyeblast.tv blog .

Go here to read the rest:
Obama Defends His Support For Ground Zero Mosque

Live Coverage of the 62nd Primetime Emmy Awards [Emmys 2010]

The Primetime Emmys are often uncomfortable and horrible , so the only fun way to watch them is with a bunch of people making fun of them. That’s just what we’re doing and—unlike the real ceremony—you’re invited! More

‘Meet the Press’ Katrina Special: All Bush and Federal Government’s Fault

As the fifth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina slamming New Orleans nears, the folks at NBC offered viewers a “Meet the Press” special edition with a sadly predictable conclusion: the disaster was all George W. Bush and the federal government’s fault. The New Orleans mayor at the time was almost entirely ignored in this hour-long examination. The only mention of the state’s former governor was actually one of praise. Rather than offering one new compelling insight into the natural disaster that changed America, the invited guests all fed fill-in host Brian Williams the same old tired lines about racism and classism; despite numerous opportunities to delve into the decades of political corruption in the region that left the levees surrounding New Orleans in a dreadful state of disrepair, the subject was never broached. Instead, what ensued – given all the time and resources available to really do a groundbreaking exposé on this issue – was something all those involved should be tremendously embarrassed for. Frankly, that was clear right from the get go (partial video follows with partial transcript and commentary, full video and transcript here and here respectively): MR. BRIAN WILLIAMS: August 29th, 2005, Hurricane Katrina touches down on the Louisiana coast. The city’s levees fail, the next morning nearly 80 percent of New Orleans is under water. A botched government response, a poor local evacuation plan, thousands are left without food, water, shelter or safety, trapped for days as the city is looted and its people suffer.  Here’s the picture that was on the screen when Williams said “botched government response”: And that was just the beginning: WILLIAMS: Senator Landrieu, before I begin with you, I want to show you a piece of videotape of another member of your family. The–a long time ago, a newspaper columnist affectionately called the Landrieu family the “Cajun Camelot,” and that’s the last time there was, first of all, a white mayor in the city of New Orleans before the current mayor, your dad, Moon Landrieu. What was it, 1970 to ’78, a two-term mayor, former head of the Conference of Mayors, later secretary of Housing. Senator, have you searched your own soul and conscience to make sure–there was so much blame that went around after Katrina–that you bore none of it? How–have you sorted out just what it was that happened here? SEN. MARY LANDRIEU: (D-LA): Well, Brian, first of all, no elected official could say that they didn’t make mistakes. We all did. It was an extremely tough time. But I can say proudly that I helped to lead the effort to help the federal government respond more effectively. And that was all the discussion about Landrieu’s potential culpability as part of a strong political family in the region, as Williams had much bigger catfish to fry: MR. WILLIAMS: Now I want to ask you about one of the many promises made after Katrina. I want to roll in a piece of sound from President George W. Bush after Katrina, speaking not far from here in Jackson Square. (Videotape, September 15, 2005) PRES. GEORGE W. BUSH: And tonight I also offer this pledge of the American people: Throughout the area hit by the hurricane, we will do what it takes, we will stay as long as it takes to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives. (End videotape) MR. WILLIAMS: Senator, you heard it. SEN. LANDRIEU: Yeah. Advertisement | ad info MR. WILLIAMS: Did it turn out to be hollow? Did it turn out… SEN. LANDRIEU: It was. MR. WILLIAMS: Do you think he was telling the truth then? SEN. LANDRIEU: Well, it, it turned out to be a hollow promise, and I’ll tell you why: Because the federal government didn’t stay and do everything they could. The federal government didn’t make it easy. They made it very, very difficult. Landrieu then went on to complain about how little money her region has received from the federal government since Katrina hit. She quoted astonishingly low numbers – in the low millions to be precise – without any challenge whatsoever from Williams about the billions of taypayer dollars that have been sent to this area since 2005.  All Williams had to do was cite figures from the Department of Homeland Security’s website to address the many billions of dollars authorized by Congress and former President Bush for Katrina relief in just the first twelve months after the storm made landfall. But that would have made Landrieu look like a liar. Potentially even more absurd, Williams didn’t ask her about last year’s Louisiana Purchase when she got $300 million for her state as a bribe from Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to change her vote in favor of healthcare reform. No, such inconvenient truths were unimportant to Williams who changed the subject to the BP oil spill: MR. WILLIAMS: Now, Senator, we should note that you were talking about wetlands before talking about wetlands was, was in vogue. And, perhaps, though, you can explain the very confusing relationship between Louisiana and oil as we look at the once-beautiful wetlands with that now characteristic oil line that’s to be found on all the grass. A lot of folks elsewhere in the country just assumed that the anger down here would come out of the oil spill, the fact that three months of oil is sitting out there in that water. A lot of folks assumed that the folks in Louisiana would be behind a stoppage until there could be a rule that if you can get oil a mile down, you should be able to stop it. What is the relationship between Louisianans, who love the great outdoors and have some of the great outdoors in all of the world, and the petroleum that comes out deep under the ground? SEN. LANDRIEU: Well, first of all, Brian, please know that people are very angry about that spill, and very disappointed in BP, and very disappointed in the subcontractors as well, and are just furious about the oil. We want to keep our waters clean. We’ve tried to keep our waters clean all these years. But we do have a strong relationship with the oil and gas industry, not just big oil, but independents and the thousands of small businesses that we built that we’re proud of that support that industry because the nation needs this oil. This nation consumes 20 million barrels of oil a day. It did the day before the Deep Horizon exploded, it does today. Now, we’re going to transition to cleaner fuels. And by the way, Louisiana is well positioned to be part of the energy future, not just our past. But that’s why people down here feel so strongly. We’ve been fishing in the same waters that we drill for oil. We’ve been navigating all of the commerce of–not only of this country, but of the world on those same waters. And yes, Brian, we recreate, we swim in those waters. And we believe with the right kind of balance in policy we can do it. So, yes, a pause was necessary. But a six-month moratorium has put a, a blanket of fear and anxiety, and it must be lifted as soon as possible. Might have been a nice time for Williams to bring up all the contributions Landrieu received from BP during the 2008 election cycle. That year, she received more from this oil company than any other member of Congress. But Williams wasn’t interested in challenging his guests:  MR. WILLIAMS: Mr. Mayor, was the administration slow off the dime when the spill happened? NEW ORLEANS MAYOR MITCH LANDRIEU: I don’t think so. They were down here pretty quickly. And, of course, this was a much different disaster than Katrina was. I can honestly say that they’ve been working very hard at it. This might have been a great time to reference a recent PPP poll about what Louisianans think about Bush’s job of handling Katrina versus Obama’s job with the oil spill (h/t NBer Gary Hall): Louisianans’ severe disapproval of Obama overall, 35-61, mirrors their disdain for his efforts in the cleanup, 32-61. George W. Bush’s handling of Hurricane Katrina, by contrast, is viewed barely negatively, 44-47; the response in June, 34-58, was more in line with Obama’s, 32-62. A full 54% now think Bush did a better job dealing with crisis than Obama, who gets the vote of only 33%. Unfortunately, Williams chose to ignore this as well, and decided to head back to Katrina: MR. WILLIAMS: How should Ray Nagin’s term as mayor be remembered, as history looks back on what happened here? MAYOR LANDRIEU: Well, that’s a, that’s a very hard thing for me to opine about, you know? MR. WILLIAMS: Try. MAYOR LANDRIEU: We’re going to let history–we’re going to let history take care of itself. I would say this. You have not seen me talk much about what happened during the storm. That was a cataclysmic event. Who knows how to judge people that went through those couple of days? I will say… MR. WILLIAMS: But you were in it, and now you have his old job. MAYOR LANDRIEU: Yeah. I don’t, I don’t think generally that it was well done. But I would say this, that subsequent to the storm, putting the city in a position to recover, as it were, I don’t think he did a good job. That’s why I ran against him the first time, and of course, it’s why I ran the second time. I really believe that this city can fix itself. But I will say this, just to put an exclamation point on President Bush’s statements a minute ago. There was huge damage, the damage was man-made. It was a result of the federal government’s negligence. And not withstanding all the incredible things that the people of America have done for us, we have not received enough money to repair the damage that was done. And when we do, we will be able to rebuild the city faster. Amazing. And that was all that was said about the mayor in the middle of this disaster. From there, Williams did an interview with actor Brad Pitt about his charitable efforts in the region, and then invited in some local celebrities that further pointed their fingers at Bush and the federal government: MR. WILLIAMS: …until we–until we recently aired our own documentary on MSNBC and NBC News, you told me you’d been in a dark radio studio on generators, you, you hadn’t seen a lot of the pictures. But now you, you think about this region so much, you’ve lived here so long, raised in the bayou south of here, four decades in New Orleans, looking back, what was it we witnessed here, what do you think went on those few days? GARLAND ROBINETTE, JOURNALIST AND RADIO HOST: To me, it was a Salvador Dali painting, it was just surreal. The United States of America couldn’t take care of itself. I’ve been to Banda Aceh, I’ve been all over the world with a company that I owned, and I’ve seen how we respond to disasters. And the very thought that for five days they couldn’t get here and do the job is just, to this day, is mind-boggling. MR. WILLIAMS: Is it too easy to throw a label on it, stamp it racism, classism? I once asked President George W. Bush on board Air Force One, I said, “Mr. President, if this had happened in Nantucket or New York or Chicago,” he interrupted me and said, “You can call me anything you want, but don’t call me a racist.” That was his response to that. What do you think was at work here? Shameful, but it was going to get worse: MR. WILLIAMS: I want to break that dull glaze by–and this is an essential part of this coverage, I believe, reminding people what it was like back then. Here is a clip from MEET THE PRESS the Sunday after Katrina that was beamed around the world. The president of Jefferson Parish, Aaron Broussard, pleading with Tim Russert and the authorities who might be watching television to send help. (Videotape, September 4, 2005) MR. AARON BROUSSARD: Nobody’s coming to get us. Nobody’s coming to get us. The secretary’s promised, everybody’s promised. They’ve had press conferences. I’m, I’m sick of the press conferences. For God sakes, shut up and send us somebody. (End videotape) MR. WILLIAMS: Aaron Broussard on live television. The research behind this special was astonishingly sub-standard; within days of Broussard’s appearance on “MTP,” it was exposed that he had lied about some of the things he told the late Tim Russert that day. Three weeks later, Russert grilled Broussard about how he had totally misrepresented the death of a colleague’s mother during his first appearance. Even worse, Broussard resigned as President of Jefferson Parish this past January in the midst of a federal corruption investigation.  Nice character witness there, Brian! But there was still more: MR. WILLIAMS: It’s yesterday, really, and it’s been five years. The children and relatives of the people at this table, I’m going to go ahead and guess, would not have gone a week without water or food because their dads, their dads’ companies would have found a way, as NBC News did, as NBC News did, to get us supplies in the central business district. They found us in Metairie in the parking lot of a used car dealer, and they made sure we had something to drink. What’s the difference? Why didn’t it matter to someone? Why wasn’t someone able to, to get supplies and get those folks out? WENDELL PIERCE, ACTOR: I think the thing that you have to remember is that we have to understand that the disaster lifted the veil of issues of race, of issues of class, not only in this city, but in the country. If we’re to move past it and truly be a part of this wonderful recovery that we’re feeling, we can’t look at it through rose-colored glasses. It is not an indictment of any one person or whatever, it’s an indictment of us all. We have to look at all of the issues that caused the fermentation of that poverty. One of the things that we can’t lose sight of is the fact that many New Orleanians heard that call from Garland Robinette on their transistors radios in the hinterlands of New Orleans, and we tried to make a Dunkirk run to that convention center–white, black, rich, poor–because they had the humanity within them when they saw those images and when they heard those voices cry out. This was an abject failure and incompetence of our government. No one’s feet have been held to the fire because of it. We can sit here and debate the pathology of what caused it–racism, classism, a lack of respect for New Orleans and this region. But does that matter if we don’t hold anyone accountable and if we forget the incompetence that was displayed during that week? We have to hold people accountable. If we’re not going to go back and hold those people accountable, make sure that we held–hold people accountable now as we move forward. And if we’re truly to move past this, we have to look at ourselves and see what is our contribution to this dysfunctional dynamic, and how can we change the paradigm, the dysfunction of class and racism, the dysfunction of education, which is the root cause of all of this. Amazing. After all, if you remove the passion from this issue and look at it from a purely logicial perspective, another conclusion has to be reached. As NewsBusters reported in March 2006, the folks at Popular Mechanics spent a great deal of time researching the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and their findings went quite contrary to the conventional wisdom both then and now: Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest-and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm’s landfall. Dozens of National Guard and Coast Guard helicopters flew rescue operations that first day-some just 2 hours after Katrina hit the coast. Hoistless Army helicopters improvised rescues, carefully hovering on rooftops to pick up survivors. On the ground, ‘guardsmen had to chop their way through, moving trees and recreating roadways,’ says Jack Harrison of the National Guard. By the end of the week, 50,000 National Guard troops in the Gulf Coast region had saved 17,000 people; 4000 Coast Guard personnel saved more than 33,000. While the press focused on FEMA’s shortcomings, this broad array of local, state and national responders pulled off an extraordinary success-especially given the huge area devastated by the storm. Computer simulations of a Katrina-strength hurricane had estimated a worst-case-scenario death toll of more than 60,000 people in Louisiana. The actual number was 1077 in that state. Once again, these facts would have gotten in the way of Williams’ agenda on Sunday, and that of liberal historian Douglas Brinkley who actually said, “Governor Blanco, during Katrina, is the one who eventually got the buses to get those people out of the convention center. And she’s the one who got the Superdome refixed, but she’s also not given credit for that.” Imagine that. The governor that badly failed her citizens during this crisis demonstrating staggering levels of incompetence was finally mentioned in this hour-long special edition of “Meet the Press” only to be commended for her efforts. That should be all readers needed to know about the total lack of impartiality and balance presented to viewers this Sunday. As I stated at the onset, the folks involved in this propagandist piece of detritus should be ashamed and embarrassed for what they’ve produced. After five years, for one of the largest and most well-funded news organizations to be able to offer no new insights or facts behind this history-changing natural disaster than that it was all caused by Bush, the federal government, and racism is nothing less than disgraceful. If this was all NBC had to say on this issue, why not just put together clips of their hideous coverage from five years ago? And they wonder why people across the fruited plain continue to switch to other sources for their news. 

Here is the original post:
‘Meet the Press’ Katrina Special: All Bush and Federal Government’s Fault

Networks Skim Over White House Oil Claim: ‘Vast Majority’ of Spill is Gone

A president with close ties to an oil company helping hide the magnitude and damage of an oil spill would be big news, if he were a conservative. But it seems even when the environmentalists and the left are upset over President Obama’s handling of the Gulf oil spill, the national news media barely notice. On Aug. 4, Obama administration energy adviser Carol Browner said, “The vast majority of the oil has been contained, it’s been burned, it’s been cleaned.” Officials said that 75 percent of the oil had been “captured, burned off, evaporated or broken down in the Gulf of Mexico,” according to CBSNews.com. That night two of the three network evening shows reported the widely disputed claim without question. Only NBC “Nightly News” included any people skeptical of the White House claim. The networks have only aired a few reports about scientists disputing the claim, and have ignored liberal outrage. “[T]onight on these beaches some good news and relief,” Matt Gutman told “World News” viewers. “A new government report says that 75 percent of that oil has been cleaned up either by man or Mother Nature. And it now seems this war against this oil is coming to an end.” Gutman’s report on the success of the oil cleanup included President Obama and Browner, but not a single person who disagreed with the White House claim. The Boston Globe reported Aug. 20, that Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution mapped a 22-mile-long underwater oil plume back in June. Other scientists at University of Georgia estimate that 70 to 79 percent of the oil from the leak remains, contrary to the White House assertion. Even if 75 percent of the oil had disappeared, the White House comments made it sound like the remaining problem is a small one – but one-fourth of the total spill would still be 53.5 million gallons of oil. CBSNews.com said that is more than four times greater than the Exxon Valdez spill. But rather than criticize Obama, CBS “Evening News” took the opportunity to subtly attack the previous president. On Aug. 4, Katie Couric teased Mark Strassmann’s report saying, “The White House made it clear today it is not declaring ‘Mission Accomplished’ yet in the Gulf of Mexico.” Strassmann followed her remarks with his story about the static kill operation to seal the well and cited the government report that “most of what has leaked, an estimated 205 million gallons, has vanished.” CBS included two Coast Guard official quotes including Admiral Thad Allen’s. Networks Ignore Left-Wing Anger over Oil Spill, Barely Include Skeptics Many people – even those on the left – have criticized the administration for its handling of the Gulf disaster. And now some of them are calling the White House’s 75 percent oil cleanup claim untrue. Left-wing news blog, The Huffington Post, called it a ” public relations coup ” for the White House, and characterized it as spin. Liberal filmmaker Spike Lee called the oil cleanup claim a “lie” and called for journalists to find the real story in an Aug. 7 meeting of the Television Critics Association. Politicians on both sides of the aisle argued the announcement came too early. On Aug. 19, Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., called Obama’s announcement premature and warned that it could be wrong. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., also criticized the administration for “another in a long line of examples where the White House’s pre-occupation with the public relations of the oil spill has superseded the realities on the ground.” A Yahoo News blog reported that the White House and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) haven’t released the data that supposedly proves their claim. “Two weeks after it touted a report painting a rosy picture in the Gulf of Mexico in the wake of the BP oil disaster, the federal government has yet to release any of the supporting data used to reach its conclusions,” Brett Michael Dykes wrote for Yahoo. Dykes also mentioned a new scientific study from researchers at the University of Georgia who found almost the opposite: that up to 79 percent of the oil is still in the Gulf. Those researchers warned that massive plumes of oil remain in deep water. In fact, scientists at the prestigious Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution published a peer-reviewed study in Science describing their June discovery of a hydrocarbon plume roughly the size of Manhattan , more than 3,000 feet below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico. On Aug. 19, CBS “Evening News” and NBC “Nightly News” used a meager 180 words combined to mention Woods Hole’s findings of that huge plume. According to Nexis, since the White House made its claim on Aug. 4, the network morning and evening shows have aired 61 stories mentioning the oil spill. But only six reports on the broadcast morning and evening news shows included anyone skeptical of the assertion (Gulf fishermen, scientists or others). A couple of additional stories mentioned doubt about the numbers, but without quoting sources. Obama Claims to be Running Oil Cleanup, Media Blame BP for Lack of Press Freedom From beginning to end, networks coverage of the oil spill has been more like cover for the Obama administration than serious reporting. ABC, CBS and NBC started by failing to scrutinize the administration’s response to the BP spill for four weeks . Then they ignored the federal fingerprints on the lack of press access to the oil spill area, even when CBS reporters were ordered away from a soiled beach by Coast Guard and BP contractors. After the oil spill, many news outlets complained about lack of access for reporting the oil spill CBS, Associated Press, Mother Jones and The Times-Picayune all claimed that local and federal authorities and British Petroleum workers inhibited their reporting. But even with Obama’s history of managing the press, the media blamed BP almost entirely. Mother Jones, a left-wing magazine, called it a “corporate blockade at Louisiana’s crude-covered beaches.” “It’s a running joke among the journalists covering the story that the words ‘Coast Guard’ affixed to any vehicle, vessel, or plane should be prefixed with ‘BP,'” Charlie Varley told Newsweek. “It would be funny if it were not so serious.” It’s also not funny that many in the news media and on the left would rather blame BP for controlling federal agencies like the U.S. Coast Guard and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) than recognize the similarities between limited media access in the Gulf and Obama’s previous actions controlling the press. Obama also has a long-standing pattern of micromanaging press coverage, sometimes to the point of blocking access. So when many reporters were complaining of access problems, it was surprising how little blame had been directed at the administration. During the campaign, Obama had three reporters from publications that had endorsed John McCain kicked off his plane. Since then he has openly attacked his detractors (including Rush Limbaugh) and was once criticized by a couple reporters (Chip Reid and Helen Thomas) for stage managing a town hall meeting. Another reason to think the White House was blocking the press is that they claimed to be calling the shots for the Gulf clean up. Browner said on “Meet the Press” May 30, “the government’s been in control from the beginning … don’t make any mistake here, the government is in charge.” ( Watch video ) Obama told AP the same thing, saying that BP had to get permission from Washington for all the clean up. So it stands to reason that the White House wouldn’t have trouble telling BP to allow the media unfettered access to report on the oil spill if it wanted to. Like this article? Then sign up for our newsletter, The Balance Sheet .

Original post:
Networks Skim Over White House Oil Claim: ‘Vast Majority’ of Spill is Gone

Stephen Baldwin Undermines His Brother’s 30 Rock Renegotiation Strategy

Do you remember how Alec Baldwin started laying 30 Rock renegotiation groundwork last month by announcing that he would retire in 2012 when his contract expires? Well, Stephen Baldwin is derailing the Emmy winner’s strategy by calling his brother’s threat “a bunch of rubbish.” The sage Baldwin told OK! magazine, “I think he’ll continue to do it as long as the show goes… I think that there’s ways that [NBC is] going to motivate him to stay around.” And the answer is yes, you can still contribute a charitable donation to Stephen Baldwin’s restoration here. God bless. [ OK! ]

The rest is here:
Stephen Baldwin Undermines His Brother’s 30 Rock Renegotiation Strategy