Tag Archives: ratings

Bozell: Congratulations to ABC News on Departure of President David Westin

Congratulations, ABC News! You are now free from the 14-year reign of the news president that helped drive your ratings into the ground. Under his leadership, Westin continually promoted some of the most liberally biased reporters in news, including George Stephanopoulos , Diane Sawyer , Christine Amanpour and Bill Weir .  He hired an Obama donor as ABC’s new Senior Medical Editor in the midst of the healthcare debate and ignored the 83,000 Americans who petitioned him to ensure that ABC reported the truth about Obama’s government takeover of healthcare. Westin neglected to address the obvious conflict of interest in George Stephanopoulos’ daily strategy phone call with Rahm Emanuel, and failed to keep his promise that ABC News would offer ‘objective’ reporting on the War on Terror in 2003. He even had the gall to suggest that the Pentagon was a legitimate terrorism target in the wake of September 11th. Two years later, he banned any ABC News personnel from wearing a patriotic flag lapel pin . ABC should seize the opportunity to replace Westin with a president who will deliver what the American people want and deserve – real journalism. It’s ABC’s only glimmer of hope for surviving in the news industry.

Read the rest here:
Bozell: Congratulations to ABC News on Departure of President David Westin

Maddow’s Mic Glitch Has Her Seeing Conspiracies

Ve haf certain powers, Miz Maddow . . . In the midst of bashing Pres. Bush over Iraq this evening, Rachel Maddow’s mic went suddenly dead, forcing her MSNBC show to go to commercial. When she returned [and after paraphrasing a line from Macbeth], Maddow let it be known she was “such a conspiracy theorist” but didn’t dare tell the audience what she was thinking because “it would discredit me forever.” RACHEL MADDOW: Spreading peace and democracy.  That was the third try at made-up reasons we invaded. How’s that worked out? It’s at that point that Maddow’s mic suddenly quit. For several moments, she can be seen speaking, with no sound at all. She begins to tap her mic, and a low-quality audio can be heard. MADDOW: Are we back?  We’re not back? Well this is unusual. One, two, three, four, five. [Inaudible] conspiracy. The show had to admit temporary defeat, and cut to commercial.  When it returned . . . MADDOW: Before I was so untimely ripped from the broadcast.  It’s really weird: it’s not like I’m on a satellite feed or anything.  I’m in my home studio, in New York.  And what we lost was the hard-wired mic that pins me to the desk. It’s really weird: nothing like that’s ever happened before. I’m such a conspiracy theorist. I cannot tell you what I’m thinking right now: it would discredit me forever. But as I was saying before that thing happened . . . Rachel, we didn’t want to hit the red button, really.  But on a night of national reconciliation, for you to have criticized Pres. Obama for saying a few kind words about Pres. Bush, then compounded things with your indictment of W’s war policy, well, our itchy finger just got the better of us 😉

See the article here:
Maddow’s Mic Glitch Has Her Seeing Conspiracies

Bozell Column: Brian Williams, From Musketeer to Mouseketeer

The fifth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina recalls a horror show on two levels. There’s the actual disaster which killed hundreds of people – and then there’s the media smear job on the Bush administration and first responders. No one should forget pompous grandstanders like “NBC Nightly News” anchor Brian Williams signing off three months after the floods from the Lower Ninth Ward:  “This is a neighborhood that’s been left to die.” How those network anchors loved hurricane hyperbole! Williams, for one, lectured the nation that the hurricane should “necessitate a national discussion on race, on oil, politics, class, infrastructure, the environment, and more.” He underlined that a top local radio station decided not to air President Bush’s remarks from the city since “nothing he could say could ever help them deal with the dire situation unfolding live in the streets of New Orleans, where people were still dying during his visit.” It never mattered to these nattering nabobs that, as Popular Mechanics magazine documented, Katrina spurred by far the largest and fastest rescue effort in American history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm’s landfall, rescuing an estimated 50,000 residents. Not content to attack Bush on just his own program, Williams took to comedy shows to unload more spin. He lectured to Jon Stewart on how cities less black than New Orleans would have seen a lot more helicopter rescues. Williams proudly took that attack directly to Bush three months after the storm. “After the tragedy, I heard someone ask rhetorically, ‘What if this had been Nantucket, Massachusetts, or Inner Harbor Baltimore or Chicago or Houston?’ Are you convinced the response would have been the same? Was there any social or class or race aspect to the response?” On the first anniversary of Katrina, Williams repeated the mudslinging, citing radical-left black professor Michael Eric Dyson in Bush’s face: “A lot of Americans are always going to believe that that weekend, that week, you were watching something on television other than what they were seeing, and Professor Dyson from the University of Pennsylvania said on our broadcast last night it was because of your patrician upbringing, that it’s a class issue.” Bush shot back: “Dyson doesn’t know. I don’t know Dyson, and Dyson doesn’t know me.” But Williams didn’t care. His cartoon was perfect. Williams later appeared on PBS and boasted “You can’t give distance. I don’t mean that in a Jets vs. Sharks way. I’m not an adversary.” That’s laughable. He insisted Bush “appreciates the swordfight of a crackling good conversation.” Now watch Williams “swordfight” with Barack Obama. He’s gone from musketeer to Mouseketeer. On the fifth anniversary of the hurricane, Williams deferred to the statesman before him by asking about the lack of a national conversation: “Katrina was about so many things. It was about class and race and government and the environment. Whatever happened to that national conversation we were supposed to have about it?” Is that all the toughness Williams could muster? That’s how he “crackles” now? See his crackling swordfight over the BP oil spill and Obama’s lack of effort: “It’s getting baked in a little bit in the media that BP was President Obama’s Katrina. And it’s also getting baked in that the administration was slow off the mark. Is that unfair?” What about our disastrous economy? Surely Williams would challenge Obama here. “Do you have anything new on the economy?” Instead of tough questions, Williams felt Obama’s pain that too many Americans misunderstand his religious faith: “Mr. President, you’re an American-born Christian, and yet increasing and now significant numbers of Americans in polls, upwards of a fifth of respondents, are claiming you are neither. A fifth of the people, just about, believe you’re a Muslim….This has to be troubling to you. This is, of course, all new territory for an American president.” That’s not even a question! But it’s all in a day’s shoeshine for Brian Williams. He loved slinging “racist, classist” mud on Bush, but he was so distraught by Obama’s-a-Muslim rumors that he replayed the poor-Barry exchange a second time the next night. Why is this arrogant partisan the leading evening-news anchor in America? He drew 7.2 million viewers last week, as the ratings continue to decline. That’s not unexpected when an anchorman can’t be bothered to ask tougher questions to this president than his makeup artist would.

See the article here:
Bozell Column: Brian Williams, From Musketeer to Mouseketeer

Sykes Has No Remorse for 2009 Limbaugh Attack: ‘He’s Just a Big Bully’

It was a performance that even liberal bomb-thrower Keith Olbermann said was over the top immediately after the fact – the May 2009 White House Correspondents’ Dinner, which Wanda Sykes took some harsh digs at conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh.   However over a year later, the comedienne shows no remorse for her remarks about Limbaugh. She appeared on the Aug. 25 broadcast of CNN’s “Larry King Live” and revisited the occasion, which she said she hoped Limbaugh’s “kidneys failed” since he wanted President Barack Obama to fail, even though that part of her attack on Limbaugh was conspicuously missing from the CNN highlight reel.  Nonetheless, King asked her if she went too far, and Sykes said no. KING: You think you went a little too far there? SYKES: Not at all. Not at all. KING: There’s no connect here, right, between here and you, right? SYKES: Probably not. It might be a little speed bump, you know, just a little one. Sykes went on to explain she did get a little pushback from Limbaugh supporters. But, she also made some judgments about Limbaugh – claiming that his brand of conservatism had little to with what was best for society. Instead she said it was all a self-serving measure, taking advantage of “poor people” to hold on to his own wealth. “I did get a nasty note,” Sykes said. “But, you know, who cares, you know? Who cares? You know, here’s the problem: Rush Limbaugh is a filthy rich guy. And he’s playing on the emotions of poor people. He’s telling poor people that, hey, you know, Obama’s going to take this, take that away from you. And really he’s just worried about his own pockets. That’s it. He’s just a big bully. I don’t think I went too far at all.” Sykes’ brief run at late-night talk ended recently. Back in May, FOX canceled her Saturday night show , “The Wanda Sykes Show,” after it struggled in the ratings. However, she has been nominated for two Emmys for her HBO stand up “I’ma Be Me.”

Read the rest here:
Sykes Has No Remorse for 2009 Limbaugh Attack: ‘He’s Just a Big Bully’

Jonas Brothers Are ‘Super Excited’ About ‘JONAS’ Emmy Award Nod

‘We’re gonna have some friendly competition,’ Joe tells MTV News about fellow Disney Channel nominees. By Jocelyn Vena Nick Jonas and Joe Jonas Photo: MTV News Later this month, the Jonas Brothers may add Emmy Award winners to their list of accomplishments. The JoBros’ hit Disney Channel show “JONAS” is nominated for Outstanding Children’s Program and they’ll be competing with some fellow Disney stars when the awards show airs on August 29. “JONAS” (now known as “JONAS L.A.”), kicked off its second season earlier this summer and has been doing well in the ratings. Still, the guys admitted they’re a bit floored by the accolade.

Read more from the original source:
Jonas Brothers Are ‘Super Excited’ About ‘JONAS’ Emmy Award Nod

As Freddie Begs for More Cash, AP’s Zibel Perpetuates Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Myths

There are quite a few shaky assertions in Alan Zibel’s Associated Press report yesterday about Freddie Mac’s latest quarterly loss ($6 billion), its latest bailout installment request to the U.S. Treasury ($1.8 billion), and the cumulative taxpayer bailout amounts that have been paid out to Freddie Mac and big sister Fannie Mae thus far ($148.2 billion) — too many to cover in a blog post. So I’ll concentrate on the howlers present in just a single paragraph near the end, wherein the AP reporter attempts to explain why the two formerly government-sponsored mortgage giants that are now government-bailout enterprises ran into the ditch. The verbiage pretty much states the meme that the establishment press seems to want the public to swallow about what went down, and who’s to blame: During the housing boom, Fannie and Freddie faced political pressure to expand homeownership and competitive pressure from Wall Street to back ever-riskier loans. When the market went bust, defaults and foreclosures piled up, and the government had to take them over. Zibel treats the two giants as if they were innocent bystanders in a boom that “just so happened” to coincide with the political pressures it faced. Nonsense. It’s more accurate to say that Fan and Fred fed the boom to the point of being its major cause . Many already know that in 1999, Fannie Mae announced looser lending standards (Fred soon followed; go here to see what this specifically meant). Even the New York Times was a bit concerned at the time: In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980’s. ”From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,” said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ”If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.” Probably much more important is something that is about the best-kept secret outside of the Wall Street Journal in the establishment press. In a December 29, 2009 article, the aforementioned Wallison conveyed an assertion by Edward Pinto, who is certainly in a position to know, that, as far back as 1993, Fan and Fred “routinely misrepresented the mortgages they were acquiring, reporting them as prime when they had characteristics that made them clearly subprime or Alt-A.” In other words, they deceived the financial markets and the ratings agencies on a massive scale about the underlying quality ofhundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars of securitized mortgages. If Zibel isn’t aware of this, he should be. If this has anything to do with “competitive pressure,” I’d like him to explain how that’s the case. It’s also not written in stone that “the government had to take them over.” Perhaps it felt obligated because of the implicit guarantees against default (they were not explicit, despite Zibel’s claim that they were), but the legal requirement for Uncle Sam to take over Fan and Fred in troubled circumstances was not there. Zibel wants readers to believe that Fan and Fred were really just victims of a “market (that) went bust” during the final year of the Bush administration. No sir, it has become painfully apparent that they sowed the seeds of that bust by committing fraud on what may be an unprecedented scale all the way back to the early Clinton years. Taxpayers are now reaping the whirlwind. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Continued here:
As Freddie Begs for More Cash, AP’s Zibel Perpetuates Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Myths

O’Reilly Calls Sanchez a Pinhead for Suggesting Fox Isn’t a News Organization

Bill O’Reilly on Tuesday called CNN’s addle-minded host Rick Sanchez a “pinhead” for once again suggesting that Fox isn’t a real news organization. As NewsBusters reported Monday, Sanchez on the program bearing his name took issue with the announcement that FNC had won a coveted front row seat in the White House briefing room. “Well, I understand the Associated Press,” said Sanchez. “I even understand Bloomberg, but don’t you have to be a news organization to get that seat?” On Tuesday’s “O’Reilly Factor,” the host struck back (video follows with transcript and commentary):  BILL O’REILLY, HOST: On the pinhead front, as you may notice, CNN is having terrible — and I mean terrible — ratings problems. Originally, they moved a new guy into the 8 p.m. slot. Obviously, that was to replace Campbell Brown. Well, things have gotten off to a very shaky spot. His ratings are down 41 percent from Ms. Brown’s, year to year. So there is some venting going on about FOX News getting a front row seat at the White House. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) RICK SANCHEZ, CNN ANCHOR: I understand the Associated Press. I even understand Bloomberg. But don’t you have to be a news organization to get that seat? UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Are you saying FOX is not a news organization? SANCHEZ: I’m just wondering. (END VIDEO CLIP) O’REILLY: Not gloating. I can’t. Pinhead? Yes, no doubt. As a point of clarification, the Sanchez segment in question happened during Monday’s 4PM installment of “Rick’s List” and not during the 8PM edition. Of course, since nobody watches Sanchez’s prime time show, who would have noticed the discrepancy? After all, Rick only garnered 400,000 viewers Monday evening. As such, maybe Sanchez ought to figure out a way to get people to watch his show before mocking a competing outlet that’s trouncing him and his network in the ratings each and every day. Just saying. 

See the original post:
O’Reilly Calls Sanchez a Pinhead for Suggesting Fox Isn’t a News Organization

‘American Idol’ Auditioners Weigh In: Jennifer Lopez Or Steven Tyler?

‘Idol’ hopefuls at New Jersey tryouts are split on who should sit at the judges’ table. By Kara Warner, with reporting by MTV News staff Jennifer Lopez Photo: Kevin Mazur/WireImage It seems like every day brings some new bit of “American Idol” insider information or speculation. With the ratings juggernaut being down two judges — Simon Cowell and Ellen DeGeneres — and the future uncertain for Kara DioGuardi and Randy Jackson , the rumor mill has been in overdrive. The first round of rumored replacements — Elton John, Justin Timberlake and Jessica Simpson — have fallen through, and Jennifer Lopez and Steven Tyler’s names have since dominated the conversation. Following up on fans’ reactions to DeGeneres’ exit and Ryan Seacrest’s recent comments that the judges might not be officially in place for weeks, MTV News hit up the “Idol” auditions in New Jersey on Tuesday (August 3) to see what the aspiring singers had to say about who would make the better judge: Lopez or Tyler. “Steven Tyler,” “Idol” wannabe Lindsey Laird said without hesitation. “Because he’s awesome. He’s from Aerosmith. That’s amazing.” Devon Michael sided with La Lopez. “That would be such an honor to stand in front of Jennifer Lopez after watching her for so many years,” he said. “She’s just versatile. She dances, she sings, she acts — it’s really admirable. She’s an inspiration to all the people here.” “I know who would be better looking,” Ben Anderton teased, before putting his support behind Tyler. “I actually think Steven Tyler would [be a better judge]. He’d give better feedback to the contestants about performance. The guy is a fantastic performer.” The Lopez fans, including enthusiastic supporter Shannon Leet, cited the “Jenny From the Block” singer’s versatility as one of her strongest qualifications. “I’ve wanted to meet her since I was a little girl,” Leet explained. “She’s an entrepreneur, actress, singer, dancer — she’s amazing.” Those in the Tyler camp were equally insistent, however, even if their enthusiasm had them thinking Tyler and Lopez were already on the audition premises. “I can’t wait to see him. I want to try and impress him,” Freddie Sosa said. “To me, he’s like a legend. I love his songs, I love his band. I’m looking forward to seeing him.” What do you think of Lopez’s and Tyler’s possible spots on the “Idol” judges’ table? Share your replacement ideas in the comments! Get your “Idol” fix on MTV News’ “American Idol” page , where you’ll find all the latest news, interviews and opinions. Related Videos Ellen DeGeneres Leaves ‘American Idol’ Related Photos Who Should Be The Next ‘American Idol’ Judge? Related Artists Jennifer Lopez

Read more:
‘American Idol’ Auditioners Weigh In: Jennifer Lopez Or Steven Tyler?

Alyssa Milano Reminds Me Of Better Days

Now that Alyssa Milano’s new sitcom is killing it with the ratings and the critics alike, she’s everywhere. I know, what new sitcom? I think it lasted almost a full episode. Anyhow, it doesn’t really matter that she hasn’t worked in ages, I’m just glad that she still gets invited to silly award shows so that I can stare at her and reminisce about her Who’s The Boss days. I will always love you Samantha…. Always.

Daily Kos: Fox News the ‘Only’ Network To Inspire Cop-Shooters

San Francisco-area newspapers reported a heavily armed unemployed 45-year-old man in body armor named Byron Williams had a shootout with California Highway Police in Oakland, and apparently he was angry with left-wingers. Naturally, the Daily Kos blog was the first to see the killer as inspired by…Fox News. So said blogger “Dem Beans” on Monday, who worried he might have targeted Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi: His mother said simply that he ‘watched the news’ and was ‘upset at Congress railroading through all these left-wing agenda items’.  One can surmise that the only ‘news’ churning their viewers constantly and getting them ‘upset’ is Fox. The irresponsibility of the right-wing media is surely going to result in more Byron Williams across the country.   Potential bloodshed, even of police officers, seems a price they’re willing to pay to push their agenda .   This kind of charge is the thing that makes bloggers look bad, to imagine the absolute worst intentions of your enemies, that they’re willing to accept a few downed policemen or assassinated politicians for the ratings points. Twenty minutes earlier, the diarist “eternallyvigilant” wondered why those “low information” conservatives have to shoot things up, while liberals believe in making peaceful change at the polling place: Seeing all the Sarah Palin diaries this morning makes me wonder why these low information people are not more angry about the kinds of erosion of our freedoms as mentioned in Jesselyn Radack’s diary and the take over of the press during the BP disaster than they are of the attempts by this administration to help the working people of this country? Why do they pick up guns for their “solution” and we go to the ballot box? [Hat tip: MSE, Not MSM]

Continued here:
Daily Kos: Fox News the ‘Only’ Network To Inspire Cop-Shooters