Tag Archives: study

CNN Advocates Watered-down Politically Correct Christianity

CNN on Friday disgustingly advocated for a watered-down, more politically correct version of Christianity. Highlighted at its website was research from a Princeton theology professor on the state of Christianity among teenagers. The study found that American churches have fallen for PC feel-good morality that’s afraid of confrontation – and the result is a generation unable to distinguish Christianity from simple theism. The author of the study, Kenda Creasy Dean, said the process was “depressing” as she interviewed one Christian after another describing God as a “therapist” who exists to validate their “self-esteem.” Worse yet, many of them could not give a coherent explanation of the Gospel, content with a general belief that God wants them to “feel good and do good.” And in MSM newsrooms across the fruited plain, there was much rejoicing. Incessant pressure to water down Christianity has finally paid off. CNN reporter John Blake wrote a piece on the sad phenomenon with no introspection as to who might be causing it: If you’re the parent of a Christian teenager, Kenda Creasy Dean has this warning: Your child is following a “mutant” form of Christianity, and you may be responsible. Dean says more American teenagers are embracing what she calls “moralistic therapeutic deism.” Translation: It’s a watered-down faith that portrays God as a “divine therapist” whose chief goal is to boost people’s self-esteem. As to the causes of why this is happening, readers were given a vague explanation: Some adults don’t expect much from youth pastors. They simply want them to keep their children off drugs and away from premarital sex. Others practice a “gospel of niceness,” where faith is simply doing good and not ruffling feathers. The Christian call to take risks, witness and sacrifice for others is muted, she says. “If teenagers lack an articulate faith, it may be because the faith we show them is too spineless to merit much in the way of conversation,” wrote Dean, a professor of youth and church culture at Princeton Theological Seminary. She says pastors often preach a safe message that can bring in the largest number of congregants. The result: more people and yawning in the pews. “If your church can’t survive without a certain number of members pledging, you might not want to preach a message that might make people mad,” Corrie says. “We can all agree that we should all be good and that God rewards those who are nice.” Corrie, echoing the author of “Almost Christian,” says the gospel of niceness can’t teach teens how to confront tragedy. Hmmm, why on Earth would pastors feel pressure to promote a gospel of niceness? Why would they be afraid of making their communities angry? Blake was clueless. There was no more discussion of the PC culture, no research into who came up with spineless Christianity. This NBer decided to help Blake out with a search of CNN’s archives. Turns out, his employer has been pushing angry backlash against fundamental Christians for years. April 23, 2010 saw CNN prime-time anchor Larry King shamefully pit a Christian lesbian against a conservative pastor for an hour of televised demagoguery. Back in 2007, the network aired a documentary in which anchor Christiane Amanpour suggested conservative Christians are akin to the Taliban. And who can forget CNN’s hard-hitting investigation that found a personal commitment to Christ leaves beautiful women “single and lonely.” Whenever evangelicals grow a spine on a particular issue, CNN can be counted on to assure that it will “make people mad.” From gay marriage to abortion to authenticity of Scripture , the network loves to marginalize traditional Christianity. And it isn’t alone. Last November, Fox Network’s hit series “Glee” portrayed evangelicals as heartless jerks who get drunk while watching Glenn Beck. A month later, CBS crime drama “NCIS” preposterously imagined a fictional Christian honor killing – in an episode that aired mere days before Christmas.  Over on the NBC network in 2008, hit series “Law & Order” portrayed an unhinged college evangelical hurling death threats at liberal professors. And in 2007, New York Magazine’s Vulture blog cheerfully listed the 10 Most Anti-Christian Films to come out of Hollywood.  When faced with evidence of systematic cultural mocking toward Christianity, liberals’ fallback argument is to claim that all religions are scorned in American media. Yet some religions seem to be more hated than others. Try searching for a list of anti-Muslim movies on New York Magazine’s website. Or anti-Wiccan. Or anti-Hindu. Hollywood projects that mock those faiths are not so highly celebrated. Try waiting for “Glee” to parallel the sad plight of Muslim American teenagers murdered by their own parents for embarrassing Islam. The show’s producers are willing to exaggerate bigotry among Christians while ignoring real domestic violence elsewhere. Also overlooked is the suffering of pregnant teen girls forcibly dragged into abortion clinics, sometimes at literal gunpoint , by angry parents. No, the real threat to children is Christians who read the Bible, want to preserve every life, and encourage healthy living. Inside the backward mind of liberals, pro-life, pro-family messages are responsible for destroying lives. In such a climate, it’s no wonder pastors are afraid of being confrontational. Having contributed to a weakened, watered-down version of Christianity, CNN is now playing dumb as to how it happened. Blake did not mention a single word about pastors unfairly getting smeared as bigots, or perhaps that these oversensitive communities are being coddled by the media. Controversial Muslims who might be out there “making people mad?” Not so much. Less than a week ago, here’s how CNN introduced the Ground Zero Mosque imam: Video clips posted today by a conservative blogger have set off a new round of bitter debate over the Islamic community center and mosque planned near Ground Zero. Are the clips part of a smear campaign or do the imam’s critics have legitimate concerns? Don’t look for the mainstream media to be reporting on a spineless version of Islam any time soon.

Read more:
CNN Advocates Watered-down Politically Correct Christianity

Another Solar System Like our Own?

There is another Sun-like star out there with an intriguing family of planets orbiting about and it could be the closest parallel to our own solar system that astronomers have found yet. European astronomers discovered a planetary system containing at least five planets, orbiting the star HD 10180, with evidence that two other planets may be present. If confirmed, one of those would have the lowest mass ever found. “We have found what is most likely the system with the most planets yet discovered,” says Christophe Lovis, who led the team. “This remarkable discovery also highlights the fact that we are now entering a new era in exoplanet research: the study of complex planetary systems and not just of individual planets. Studies of planetary motions in the new system reveal complex gravitational interactions between the planets and give us insights into the long-term evolution of the system.” To make this system even more intriguing, the team also found evidence that the distances of the planets from their star follow a regular pattern, as also seen in our Solar System. “This could be a signature of the formation process of these planetary systems,” said team member Michel Mayor. HD 10180, is located 127 light years away in the southern constellation of Hydrus. The five confirmed planets are large, about the size of Neptune — between 13 and 25 Earth masses —with orbital periods ranging from between six and 600 days. The planets’ distances from the star ranges from 0.06 and 1.4 times the Earth–Sun distance. “We also have good reasons to believe that two other planets are present,” said Lovis. One would be a Saturn-like planet (with a minimum mass of 65 Earth masses) orbiting in 2200 days. The other would be the least massive exoplanet ever discovered, with a mass of about 1.4 times that of the Earth. It is very close to its host star, at just 2 percent of the Earth–Sun distance. One “year” on this planet would last only 1.18 Earth-days.“ This object causes a wobble of its star of only about 3 km/hour— slower than walking speed — and this motion is very hard to measure,” says team member Damien S

In Utero Pesticide Exposure Increases Risk of ADHD

Photo via fruitforourchildren.com In May 2010, TreeHugger reported on the research linking pesticide exposure and ADHD in children. A study published recently in Environmental Health Perspectives by U.C. Berkeley School of Public Health researchers found that exposure of children to organophosphates while in utero may result in increased likelihood that the child will have ADHD. While the study does not prove that there is a causal link between pesticides and ADHD, it is not a stretch to think that organophosphates that attack the nervous systems of insects could also interfere… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
In Utero Pesticide Exposure Increases Risk of ADHD

Special schools a fast track to prison

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/special-schools-a-fast-track-to… BOYS are being segregated from the mainstream school system for behavioural and emotional disorders at about six times the rate of girls. A study by Macquarie University researchers has found a disturbing pattern suggesting specialist behaviour schools may act as a “school-to-prison pipeline”, in which students do not return to mainstream classes but enter juvenile justice centres. Based on an analysis of data from NSW, which has the most transparent education system, the study, to be published next month in the journal Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, examined the diagnoses of students enrolled in special classes and schools. It found boys and girls were almost equally represented in intensive English classes for new migrant children, and that the diagnosis of physical disabilities such as hearing and vision impairment, or moderate to severe intellectual disability, has remained relatively stable over the past decade. But the study found boys with physical disabilities were more likely to be in special schools than girls, while the numbers were more representative of the general student body in special classes in mainstream schools. The proportion of boys in special classes rises as diagnosis of their condition becomes more subjective, with boys accounting for 85 per cent of students in special schools with behavioural and emotional disorders. Lead researcher Linda Graham said enrolments for behavioural and emotional conditions start to rise in Year 5, when students are about 10 and specialist behaviour schools start accepting students. Dr Graham said this situation would be similar in other states. The NSW government established the first behaviour school in 2001 and now runs about 35 — including 14 for students with mental health problems — teaching about 500 students from Year 5 to Year 10. The enrolments for students with behaviour disorders rise sharply until they turn 13, which Dr Graham said was when the juvenile justice system started to pick up children. The enrolment pattern for students with behaviour disorders in juvenile justice facilities mirrors the trend in special schools, with enrolments for boys rising steeply from 13 on. Dr Graham said the similarities of the trend in behaviour disorders and juvenile justice involvement raised the question of whether behaviour schools “precipitate movement down a school-to-prison pipeline”. “Reports suggest that these kids are being sent into holding pens,” she said. “They're becoming repositories for kids … and once they go in, it appears a high proportion are not coming … out. “These are kids who are disengaging because they're not learning at the rate of their peers in the first school years,” she said. A spokesman for the NSW Education Department said students were usually enrolled in the behaviour schools for two to three terms, but this varied according to the type of behaviour problem involved. About half the students placed in behaviour schools returned to the mainstream system, he said. added by: MotherForTruth

Get Bisphenol A Out of the Grocery Store (Are You Listening, Whole Foods?)

Photo credit yanyanyanyanyan via flickr . Bisphenol A, which seems to contribute to a wide variety of yucky ailments , is in 91% of Canadians, this study shows. And as we’ve already documented in TreeHugger, it’s

Continue reading here:
Get Bisphenol A Out of the Grocery Store (Are You Listening, Whole Foods?)

AP Headline: ‘Teen Sex Not Always Bad For School Performance’

Here’s a headline destined to ruin many a parent’s Sunday: Teen Sex Not Always Bad For School Performance As if that wasn’t enough, the Associated Press actually framed this  as  good news :  There’s good news for parents who worry that their teenagers’ sex lives are affecting their school performance: A provocative new study has found that teens in committed relationships do no better or worse in school than those who don’t have sex.  After that cheery opening paragraph, things got a bit dicey, for the results of this University of California, Davis, study had little in common with the headline and lede: The same isn’t true for teens who “hook up.” Researchers found that those who have casual flings get lower grades and have more school-related problems compared with those who abstain. The findings, presented Sunday at a meeting of the American Sociological Association in Atlanta, challenge to some extent assumptions that sexually active teens tend to do poorer in school. It’s not so much whether a teen has sex that determines academic success, the researchers say, but the type of sexual relationship they’re engaged in. Teens in serious relationships may find social and emotional support in their sex partners, reducing their anxiety and stress levels in life and in school. “This should give some comfort to parents who may be concerned that their teenage son or daughter is dating,” said sociologist Peggy Giordano of Bowling Green State University, who had no role in the research. Teen sex is “not going to derail their educational trajectories,” she said. Feeling comfortable parents? Well, don’t be, because the actual results of this study were not what the AP led on: Compared with virgins, teens who have casual sex had lower GPAs, cared less about school and experienced more problems in school. For example, female teens who have flings had GPAs that were 0.16 points lower than abstinent teens. Male teens who have casual sex had GPAs that were 0.30 points lower than those who do not have sex. Teens who hook up also were at greater risk of being suspended or expelled and had lower odds of expecting to go to college. Teens who have sex – whether it’s a serious or casual relationship – were at higher risk of being truant and dropping out compared with teens who don’t have sex.  Add it all up, and it seems this study makes a strong case for teenage abstinence – but you certainly wouldn’t know that from the headline and opening paragraph, would you? 

Original post:
AP Headline: ‘Teen Sex Not Always Bad For School Performance’

Taxpayers Fund Study Establishing ‘Web-Based Sex Diaries’ for Gay Males as Young as 16

The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), a division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has awarded $126,000 over the past two years to a University of Washington study that established “web-based sex diaries” for gay males as young as 16. By the time the grants end in 2011, taxpayers will have spent more than $250,000 for the study. “The study’s second aim is to assess the feasibility of using web-based sex diaries to collect sexual behavior data and to identify the appropriate diary schedule. MSM [men who have sex with men] will be randomly assigned diary schedules and we will compare the frequency of reported behaviors across diary schedules and against the retrospective questionnaire data,” the grant abstract states. The study, titled “The Importance of Early Sexual Experiences Among Men Who Have Sex with Men,” seeks to find out if the circumstances under which young homosexuals first engage in homosexual acts impacts their future sexual behavior. Researchers will attempt to follow 100 gay men ages 16-20 who have had fewer than three gay sex partners or are “within three years of their same-sex debut,” meaning that they had their first gay sexual experience within the past three years. The 100 gay men will be asked to fill out an online questionnaire about their early gay experiences, take regular HIV tests, and fill out the sex diaries detailing the gay sex acts they engage in. “Men who have sex with men (MSM) experience rates of HIV and bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STI) that are many times those experienced by heterosexuals in the U.S.,” the abstract states. “We propose to conduct a cohort study of 100 MSM who are: 1) age 16-20 with 1-3 lifetime male sex partners, or 2) age 16-30 within 3 years of their same-sex sexual debut. This cohort will be followed for 1 year during which participants will complete a baseline computer administered self-interview (CASI) regarding early homosexual experiences and sexual behavior; retrospective online follow-up questionnaires every 3 months; web-based sex diaries; and HIV/STI testing at baseline, 6, and 12 months.” The study, which has been awarded funding until completion in 2011, seeks to determine whether homosexual men who engage in same-sex relations at an early age are more likely to engage in further risky sexual behavior and, if so, what types of risky sexual behavior they engage in. Investigators will try to find patterns common to the sexual behaviors of young gay men, including condom use, HIV status disclosure, and their sexual repertoire. “[I]nvestigators will conduct exploratory analyses to define patterns of sexual behaviors such as condom use, HIV status disclosure, and sexual role and repertoire. The principal investigator for the project is Dr. Matthew R. Golden of the University of Washington in Seattle. Golden is the director of the university’s HIV/STD research program. According to NIAID, another $63,000 will be awarded for this project in fiscal 2010 and another $63,000 in fiscal 2011–giving the project a total of $252,000 in taxpayer funding through June of 2011. CNSNews.com asked both Golden and NIAID the following question: “The Census Bureau says the median household income in the United States is $52,000. How would you explain to the average American mom and dad–who make $52,000 per year–that taxing them to pay for this grant was justified? Golden did not respond to the question. But the National Institutes of Health responded by e-mail. “One of the primary research goals of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is to develop effective HIV/AIDS prevention strategies to control and ultimately end the HIV/AIDS pandemic, which has killed 25 million people worldwide,” an NIH spokeswoman said. “The goal of this study is to augment efforts to prevent the spread of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men in the United States, a population that is disproportionately affected by HIV and STIs. “Although only a small percentage of American men report having sex with other men, this group accounts for nearly half of all people in the United States living with HIV and more than half of all new HIV infections in this country each year. It is noteworthy that some men who have sex with men also have sex with women, meaning an HIV-infected man in this population could also spread the virus to a heterosexual woman. “This small pilot study by Matthew Golden is focused on determining the feasibility of a larger study to learn how young men who have sex with men form patterns of sexual behavior, what factors predict these patterns, and how these behavioral patterns change over a lifetime. “This information will help scientists design more effective HIV and STI prevention programs for men who have sex with men in the United States, especially for those at highest risk for infection. With the lifetime cost of HIV/AIDS treatment in the United States estimated to range from $470,600 to $665,500 per person in 2004 dollars (which is $550,000 to $779,000 per person in 2010 dollars), it is more cost-effective to prevent HIV infection than to treat it.” Crossposted at NB sister site CNS News  

View post:
Taxpayers Fund Study Establishing ‘Web-Based Sex Diaries’ for Gay Males as Young as 16

Biochar Alone Could Offset 12% of All Human Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Study

Through application to soil in farmer’s fields, biochar both can help increase soil fertility and store carbon emissions. Photo: Feral Arts via flickr. More new info on the potential of biochar to help combat climate change: A study in the journal Nature Communications shows that up to 12% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans could be offset by p… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See the rest here:
Biochar Alone Could Offset 12% of All Human Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Study

Growing up too soon? Puberty strikes 7-year-old girls

The changes in Kiera’s body scared her parents. Though the 8-year-old seemed her usual chipper self, she’d started to develop headaches and acne. More alarming to her mom, Sharon, were the budding breasts on Kiera’s thin little chest. When Kiera’s parents took their daughter to the doctor, he assured them that nothing was wrong with the girl. Kiera was simply starting puberty early. As it turns out, puberty at age 7 or 8 isn’t so unusual these days. A new study, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, shows that more American girls are maturing earlier and earlier. Typically, U.S. girls hit puberty around age 10 or 11. Exactly what this shift means for girls isn’t clear yet — either on a group or individual level. But there are budding concerns. For instance, studies have linked an early start to menstruation with an elevated risk of breast cancer. And other research has shown that girls who go through puberty early tend to have lower self-esteem and a poor body image. They are also more likely to engage in risky behaviors which can result in unplanned pregnancies, experts say. The possible link to breast cancer was what sparked the new study. To take a long-term look at the impact of puberty and other factors on breast cancer, researchers enrolled 1,239 girls between the ages of 6 and 8 from three sites in the U.S.: New York’s East Harlem, the greater Cincinnati metropolitan area and the San Francisco Bay area. The study revealed a surprisingly large bump in the number of girls going through puberty between the ages of 7 and 8. For example, the researches found that 10 percent of 7-year-old white girls had some breast development as compared to 5 percent in a study published in 1997. Similarly, 23 percent of the 7-year-old black girls had started puberty as compared to 15 percent in the 1997 study. Nobody’s sure what is driving the declining age of puberty. But the rise in obesity could be at least partly to blame, says the study’s lead author, Dr. Frank Biro, director of adolescent medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. ———————————————————————————————————————— _____________________________________________________________________ As a species this is an ominous development. I for one believe this is a man made development and not a natural one. One day our need to produce bigger, better, and more of our sustenance will lead to us rendering our female population unable to procreate. added by: onemalefla

Study Shows Conflicted Meat-Eaters in Denial That Meat-Animals Suffer

A new study from the University of Kent has provided direct evidence that people who wish to escape the ‘meat paradox’ i.e. simultaneously disliking hurting animals and enjoying eating meat, may do so by denying that the animal they ate had the capacity to suffer. By engaging in denial, those participating in the study also reported a reduced range of animals to which they felt obligated to show moral concern. These ranged from dogs and chimps to snails and fish. The study, the results of which are published in the August issue of Appetite, was conducted by Dr Steve Loughnan, Research Associate at the University’s School of Psychology, and colleagues in Australia. Prior to their study, it was generally assumed that the only solutions to the meat paradox are for people to simply stop eating meat, a decision taken by many vegetarians, or the ongoing failure to recognise that animals are killed to produce meat (although few people live in true ignorance, some meat-eaters may live in a state of tacit denial, failing to equate beef with cow, pork with pig, or even chicken with chicken). Dr Loughnan explained: ‘Some people do choose to stop eating meat when they learn that animals suffer for its production. An overwhelming majority do not. Our research shows that one way people are able to keep eating meat is by dampening their moral consideration of animals when sitting at the dinner table.’ Dr Loughnan also explained that, broadly speaking, their study has shown that when there is a conflict between their preferred way of thinking and their preferred way of acting, it is their thoughts and moral standards that people abandon first – rather than changing their behaviour. ‘Rather than change their beliefs about the animals’ moral rights, people could change their behaviour,’ he said. ‘However, we suspect that most people are unwilling to deny themselves the enjoyment of eating meat, and denying animals moral rights lets them keep eating with a clear conscience’. ‘The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals’ (Stephen Loughnan, University of Kent; Nick Haslam, University of Melbourne; Brock Bastian, University of Queensland) is published in the August issue of Appetite. Dr Loughnan is a member of the University’s Leverhulme Trust-funded Centre for Research on Social Climate. added by: animalia_libero