Tag Archives: project

T.I. Prepping Animated Series, ‘Lil Homies’

MC thinking about lending his voice to the cartoon, which he is producing. By James Montgomery T.I. Photo: Brad Barket/Getty Images T.I. is still deciding on the final track list for his upcoming album King Uncaged — a rather daunting process, considering he recorded some 80 songs (including a track featuring Lady Gaga ) for the project. But that doesn’t mean he’s not working on other endeavors — like, for example, a cartoon. In an interview last week on Sirius’ Shade 45, Tip confirmed that he’s developing an animated series called “Lil Homies.” He’ll serve as a producer on the show, and he’s also considering lending his vocal talents to the project. “I’m actually working on a TV show right now as a producer,” he told Shade 45’s Angela Yee. “[It’s] a cartoon … called ‘Lil Homies.’ I may do, like, voice over [work] … like a narrator.” T.I. said that “Homies” still is without a network, but he’s pushing ahead with the series regardless, even saying that he’d use his producer clout to cast Yee as “a neighborhood freak.” If and when the series hits TV, Tip will join a long list of rappers who have crossed over to the animated world: Outkast’s Andre 3000, whose series “Class of 3000” ran on the Cartoon Network in 2006; T-Pain, who served as executive producer of (and lent his voice to) “Freaknik: The Musical” earlier this year; and Danger Mouse and MF Doom, who released an album and an EP (2005’s The Mouse and the Mask and ’06’s Occult Hymn ) that featured beats taken from Cartoon Network’s “Adult Swim” programming, and more than a few cameos by “Adult Swim” stars. Related Artists T.I.

View post:
T.I. Prepping Animated Series, ‘Lil Homies’

Sandra Bullock, Tom Hanks Eyeing ‘Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close’

Preproduction work has begun on film adaptation of Jonathan Safran Foer’s 9/11 novel. By Adam Rosenberg Sandra Bullock Photo: Jason Merritt/ Getty Images After several years in development, Jonathan Safran Foer’s second novel just got a little bit closer to getting a film adaptation. Preproduction work on the “Everything Is Illuminated” author’s 2005 9/11 novel, “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,” is under way. Offers are going out to talent while co-producing studios Warner Bros. and Paramount figure out how things will work, Deadline reports. It is also revealed that Sandra Bullock and Tom Hanks are “circling the project,” something Bullock’s rep confirmed to MTV News. A call to Hanks’ rep had not been returned as of press time. “Extremely Loud” follows a 9-year-old New York boy in the aftermath the 9/11 attacks, in which his father was killed. The boy finds a key that belonged to his dad, but he doesn’t know what it unlocks. The story charts his search to answer that question. Foer’s book employs an untraditional writing style that incorporates multiple interconnected storylines, photographs and the like. The rights to the novel were first acquired several years ago. Scott Rudin is producing and Stephen Daldry (“The Hours”) is attached to direct, with a script from “Forrest Gump” writer Eric Roth. Warner Bros. is described as the lead studio on the project. Hanks recently wrapped shooting on “Larry Crowne,” which he directed and stars in (he co-wrote the script with Nia Vardalos). It is his second feature effort as a writer/director, following the 1996 drama/comedy “That Thing You Do!” Bullock had a dynamite 2009 as one of the highest-grossing performers that year, between “All About Steve,” “The Proposal” and “The Blind Side,” for which she won the Best Actress Oscar, her first win in that category. For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Photos The Evolution Of: Sandra Bullock

Continued here:
Sandra Bullock, Tom Hanks Eyeing ‘Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close’

In July, LA School Officials Defended RFK Taj Mahal K-12 Complex as ‘More Than Justified’

Well, it didn’t take to much digging to find people who think that the $578 million cost of the new Taj Mahal complex known as the Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools in Los Angeles (pictured at right; noted last night at NewsBusters and BizzyBlog ) isn’t that big of a deal. What I found makes me wonder why it took so long for waste of this magnitude to become a national story. On July 9, at LA’s Daily News , Connie Llanos chronicled much of the story behind how costs spiraled out of control. Readers will have to go to the link to get that detail. In terms of the project’s final cost, Llanos found plenty of people willing to say that spending over $135,000 per seat is okey-dokey (bolds are mine): RFK is LAUSD’s most costly campus – and it needs more cash … District officials say the cost of the Robert F. Kennedy complex is more than justified if you consider its urban location, historical significance and expected community role. “It has all the modern amenities, like an underground garage, a pool, a state-of-the-art auditorium…,” said James Sohn, LAUSD’s chief facilities executive. “In that context, cost of the schools is appropriate.” The 23-acre Wilshire Boulevard lot will bring the park-starved neighborhood much-needed green space, including soccer fields and a state-of-the-art swimming pool. It also includes public art pieces and a marble mural memorial to Kennedy, who was running for president when he was gunned down in the hotel’s kitchen. Still, some of the items purchased for the school have caught the attention of top district officials, such as talking benches designed by artists to commemorate the historic significance of the Ambassador Hotel and its famous Cocoanut Grove nightclub. … But the schools chief said small extravagances shouldn’t detract from seeing the school as a centerpiece for the community and the city. From its inception, the Ambassador schools were intended to be one of the most elaborate campuses, funded through the district’s $20 billion voter-approved construction bond program. … School board member Steve Zimmer said he will look closely at the change orders that have been requested for the project. But he added that “if the true cost were $250,000 a seat, it would be worth every penny.” … Charter school officials, however, said LAUSD’s construction costs were exorbitant. “If you look at that cost per seat, that is three or four times what many charter schools are delivering in the Los Angeles area,” said Jed Wallace, president of the California Charter School Association. Some context: The end of Llanos’s report contains comparative cost figures for other facilities in the LA area. Here are a few, and when they were built: Staples Center: $375 million, 1999 Walt Disney Concert Hall: $274 million, 2003 Universal Studios backlot: $200 million, 2010 Downtown cathedral: $190 million, 2002 More context: Earlier this year, New Trier, a relatively well-off school district in suburban Chicago, ” known for its large spending per student,” proposed building a new high school for its 3,100 students at a cost of $174 million. Even though that figure is about 60% less per seat than LA’s RFK, locals characterized it as a “Taj Mahal” project. One Chicago TV station covering the proposal simply asked: “Are you kidding me?” Voters resoundingly rejected the new high school by a margin of 62. Keep in mind that all of this is occurring as both  California  and  Los Angeles  are on the verge of financial collapse. Yet another shocker: Llanos writes that RFK’s cost is “40 percent higher than the average school built in the central Los Angeles area over the past two years.” That’s all? From here, it looks like LAUSD got its $20 billion in bond money and immediately set out to burn through it all as quickly as possible. Prediction: Ten years from now, if not less, we’re going to be seeing stories about how high building maintenance and energy costs are stretching the district’s finances. Cry me a river. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Link:
In July, LA School Officials Defended RFK Taj Mahal K-12 Complex as ‘More Than Justified’

Katy Perry Says ‘Pearl’ Is Her Album’s Crowning Jewel

Pop star says ballad is the perfect way to end Teenage Dream. By Jocelyn Vena, with reporting by Sway Calloway Katy Perry Photo: MTV News Katy Perry rose to the top of the charts with songs about kissing girls, Vegas vacations gone awry and how awesome “California Gurls” are. So, when fans pop Teenage Dream into their boom boxes, they might be surprised to hear Perry show her vulnerable side on the song “Pearl.” The ballad is about an outgoing, strong young woman who lets a guy “keep her in the dark.” The catch, at the end, is that Perry is actually singing about herself. The singer admitted that by the time she started working on “Pearl,” her album was nearly complete. But, it was missing something. So she headed back into the studio to work on the track. And she thinks it finishes her record in just the right way. “I did one more song with [producer] Greg Wells, and it was called ‘Pearl,’ ” she explained to MTV News about the track. “And it was kind of just like, ‘All right, now I have this crown, and I have all these jewels, and I can put these little jewels into the crown, and I feel like it’s a complete presentation, something I’m really proud of.’ ” So, after recording Teenage Dream rather quickly, “Pearl” became its crowning jewel. “It only took six months [to make Teenage Dream ], which is like lightning speed,” she said. “But I think that I wouldn’t be starting again with this new record if I didn’t feel like this was my best foot forward. Perry said the project shows her evolving. “It’s an evolvement, but it’s not a dis-attachment. … My life is a little bit different, and I’m taking a verbal snapshot right now.” Are you excited to hear Katy Perry’s new album? Let us know in the comments! Related Videos MTV News Extended Play: Katy Perry Related Photos The Evolution Of: Katy Perry

Go here to read the rest:
Katy Perry Says ‘Pearl’ Is Her Album’s Crowning Jewel

Frank Rich Blames Ground Zero Mosque Opinion On Rupert Murdoch’s ‘Islamophobia Command Center’

New York Times columnist Frank Rich on Sunday blamed America’s opinion of the Ground Zero mosque on the “Islamophobia command center” of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. As readers are likely aware, its properties include Fox News, the New York Post, and the Wall Street Journal, all witting accomplices to a devious plot to stoke anti-Muslim sentiment according to Rich. Never mind that public opinion polls around the country and in New York state show vast majorities in opposition to the building of this Islamic center at the site of the 9/11 attacks. In Rich’s paranoid view , it’s all Murdoch’s fault: In the five months after The Times’s initial account there were no newspaper articles on the project at all. It was only in May of this year that the Rupert Murdoch axis of demagoguery revved up, jettisoning Ingraham’s benign take for a New York Post jihad . The paper’s inspiration was a rabidly anti-Islam blogger best known for claiming that Obama was Malcolm X’s illegitimate son . Soon the rest of the Murdoch empire and its political allies piled on, promoting the incendiary libel that the “radical Islamists” behind the “ground zero mosque” were tantamount either to neo-Nazis in Skokie ( according to a Wall Street Journal columnist ) or actual Nazis ( per Newt Gingrich ). The Fox patron saint Sarah Palin calls Park51 a “stab in the heart” of Americans who “still have that lingering pain from 9/11.” But her only previous engagement with the 9/11 site was when she used it as a political backdrop for taking her first questions from reporters nearly a month after being named to the G.O.P. ticket. (She was so eager to grab her ground zero photo op that she defied John McCain’s just-announced “suspension” of their campaign.) At the Islamophobia command center, Murdoch’s News Corporation, the hypocrisy is, if anything, thicker. A recent Wall Street Journal editorial darkly cited unspecified “reports” that Park51 has “money coming from Saudi charities or Gulf princes that also fund Wahabi madrassas.” As Jon Stewart observed , this brand of innuendo could also be applied to News Corp., whose second largest shareholder after the Murdoch family is a member of the Saudi royal family. Perhaps last week’s revelation that News Corp. has poured $1 million into G.O.P. campaign coffers was a fiendishly clever smokescreen to deflect anyone from following the far greater sum of Saudi money (a $3 billion stake) that has flowed into Murdoch enterprises, or the News Corp. money (at least $70 million) recently invested in a Saudi media company . Were McCain in the White House, Fox and friends would have kept ignoring Park51. But it’s an irresistible target in our current election year because it revives the most insidious anti-Obama narrative of the many Fox promoted in the previous election year: Obama the closet Muslim and secret madrassa alumnus. Rich then cited a number of polls including the recent Pew Research Center survey regarding Obama’s religious beliefs as well as the increasing opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet nowhere did he inform readers about the vast majorities against building this mosque in its current proposed location. According to CNN/Opinion Research Corporation: [N]early 70 percent of all Americans oppose the controversial plan to build the mosque just blocks away from the solemn site in lower Manhattan while just 29 percent favor the construction. Broken down by party affiliation, 54 percent of Democrats oppose the plans while 82 percent of Republicans disapprove. Meanwhile, 70 percent of independents said they are against the proposal. A Siena Research Institute poll found 61 percent of New Yorkers also opposed to this mosque’s location. Are all of these folks getting their news from Fox, the Journal, and the Post? Consider that Fox News on Thursday averaged a little over 1 million viewers throughout the day, with prime time at 2.4 million.  For its part, the Journal’s circulation is 2.1 million. The Post is a little above 500,000. Add it all up, and even in prime time, these three outlets touch roughly five people a day. But according to Rich, we have them to blame for the overwhelming majority opposed to the Ground Zero mosque. As Hillary Clinton might say, it requires a willing suspension of disbelief to reach such an absurd conclusion. Nice job, Frank!  

Read more:
Frank Rich Blames Ground Zero Mosque Opinion On Rupert Murdoch’s ‘Islamophobia Command Center’

Obama Forgot "New Direction" In Drug Policy; Sticks With DEA Nominee Michele Leonhart Despite Criticism of Raids

Obama is confident that Leonhart is the right choice, the White House staffer said, and that as of Friday the president wasn’t considering anyone else for the position. In other words, the response from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to a chorus of concerns boils down to: Leonhart or bust. In response to this message, critics have pointed out that Obama is shifting his stance on marijuana policy. “It’s unfortunate — and outright baffling — that the Obama administration would choose someone for this post whose resume is so strongly at odds with the ‘new direction’ this administration had promised for drug policy in general and medical marijuana in particular,” the Marijuana Policy Project’s Mike Meno told The Daily Caller. “During the election campaign, and again through the Department of Justice memo in October, President Obama vowed to stop the outrageous Bush-era practice of raiding and prosecuting medical marijuana patients and providers who operate under state law. If change is what they seek, why would the administration nominate a Bush holdover under whom the DEA continues to raid the private property of citizens obeying state law? It makes no sense.” MPP and other marijuana activists have pointed to a series of raids the DEA conducted in California as recently as last month as evidence that Leonhart is continuing the Bush-era strategy of cracking down on medical marijuana dispensaries and growers, even if they are operating legally under California law. They say this conflicts directly with statements Obama made on the campaign trail, such as this one from April 2008: “When it comes to medical marijuana, I have a practical view more than anything. My attitude is that if it’s an issue of doctors prescribing medical marijuana as a treatment for glaucoma or a cancer treatment, there really is no difference between that and a doctor prescribing morphine, or anything else.” But the White House and the Justice Department both told TheDC that Holder’s memo does not give dispensaries carte blanche to grow or sell marijuana, and that recent raids don’t conflict with what Obama expressed while campaigning. “I wouldn’t say the memo ‘discourages’ certain raids,” a DOJ offical told TheDC. Rather, “it talks about prioritizing resources most efficiently.” And both the White House and the DOJ argued that the gist of the Holder memo was that the DEA would “not focus its limited resources on individual patients with cancer or other serious diseases.” Critics see the distinction between cancer patients who take medical marijuana and the people who sell them medical marijuana as hair-splitting. “Attorney General Eric Holder was crystal clear last year when he directed officials within his department not to waste federal resources interfering with state medical marijuana laws,” wrote FireDogLake’s Jane Hamsher in the open letter distributed by the Marijuana Policy Project. “Yet throughout the tenure of President Obama’s administration, the DEA’s raids have continued in a manner wholly inconsistent with the spirit of that directive. What part of ‘not a priority’ does Michele Leonhart not understand?” added by: Omnomynous

OUTRAGE OVER PLANS TO BUILD LIBRARY NEXT TO SARAH PALIN

PLANS to build a state-of-the-art library next to Republican catastrophe Sarah Palin are causing outrage across mainstream America. Campaigners have described the project as insensitive and a deliberate act of provocation by people with brains. The issue is forming a dividing line in advance of November's mid-term congressional elections with candidates being forced to declare whether they have ever been to a library or spoken to someone who has books in their home. Meanwhile President Obama has caused unease within his own Democratic party by endorsing the library and claiming that not everyone who reads books is responsible for calling Mrs Palin a fuckwit nutjob nightmare of a human being. But Bill McKay, a leading member of the right-wing Teapot movement, said: “Sarah Palin is a hallowed place for Americans who can't read. “How is she going to feel knowing that every day there are people going inside a building to find things out for themselves and have thoughts, right in the very shadow of her amazing nipples.” He added: “Our founding fathers intended for every building in this country to be a church containing one book, written by Jesus, that would be read out in a strange voice by an orange man in a shiny suit who would also tell you who you were allowed to kill. “Building a library next to Mrs Palin is like Pearl Harbour. Or 9/11.” And Wayne Hayes, a pig masseur from Coontree, Virginia, said: “I is so angry right now. “It's like something is on fire right in the middle of my head. Like I've eaten a real hot chilli, but it's gone up my nose tubes rather than down my ass tubes.” He added: “Would these library lovers allow me to set up a stall next to the Smithsonian Museum and start selling DVDs of bible cartoons as long as it was in accordance with local regulations? “Oh they would? I see. So is that why they're better than me?” Almost 40% of Americans still support the idea of books. added by: toyotabedzrock

Justin Bieber 3-D Movie Is ‘A Story For Our Time,’ Director Says

‘We’re gonna tell the underdog story of where he came from,’ Jon Chu says of the Bieb’s YouTube-fueled success. By Jocelyn Vena Justin Bieber Photo: Frederick Breedon/ Getty Images Valentine’s Day weekend won’t just be lovers in 2011. Devoted Beliebers are counting down to the moment they can check out Justin Bieber’s 3-D movie . Director Jon Chu promises fans will get an in-depth look at what it’s like to be the VMA-nominated singer . “Well, we’re working on it right now. We’ve been touring with him, so we’ve been working on it,” Chu (“Step Up 3D”) told MTV News about the project. “The movie comes out in five months, so we’re deep in it. It’s been fun to get to know Justin. He’s a really cool guy and we’re gonna make a really fun movie.” Those who have yet to be infected with Bieber Fever should take note: This movie is for fans and non-fans alike, according to Chu. “[It’s] a movie for his fans, a movie for people who don’t know him, and we’re gonna tell the underdog story of where he came from,” he explained. “Because it’s a really fascinating story and it has a lot to do with our sort of digital lifestyle now. He was able to do what corporations try to do now when they use YouTube and they don’t even know what to do with it yet. It’s a pretty cool story for our time.” As for the film’s format, Chu explained that it will be a mixture of concert footage and some documentary-style scenes. “There’s not going to be acted-out scenes and I can’t talk about the rest. It’s not your typical concert film and it’s not going to be a biopic … but it is about his life. I think it’s more of a documentary. We’re going to figure it out as we go,” he said. As for how much of it will be in 3-D, he said, “You’ll have to see it. We’re figuring that out now.” Chu had more praise for Bieber, telling us the singer has real staying power, as evidenced by artists like Kanye West seeking him out for collaborations. “He … isn’t a flash in the pan,” Chu said. “He has legitimate talent and I think other artists recognize that.” What part of Justin’s biography do you most want to see played out in 3-D? Tell us in the comments! For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Artists Justin Bieber

Continued here:
Justin Bieber 3-D Movie Is ‘A Story For Our Time,’ Director Says

USA Today Blogger Annoyed by Ground Zero Mosque/Auschwitz Convent Analogies

“Ground Zero is not Auschwitz, so why all the analogies?” USA Today religion blogger Cathy Lynn Grossman asks that question with the headline of her August 18 Faith & Reason post . Grossman explained that the comparison stems from conservatives who pointed out an incident in the early 1990s when Pope John Paul II halted a planned convent near the Auschwitz concentration camp. The nuns had every right to build the convent, but it was unwise and insensitive to do so, leading the pontiff to scrap the plan. By way of analogy, Muslims have every right to build a mosque near Ground Zero, but the insensitivity of doing so blocks from the site of the deadliest radical Islamic terror attack in U.S. history should lead Muslim leaders to call for the project to be scrapped. But Grossman then went on to quote two liberals who reject the Auschwitz analogy as invalid before she conflated the Ground Zero mosque issue with isolated incidents across the country where other folks are raising NIMBY objections to mosques in their hometowns (emphasis Grossman’s): Meanwhile, none of the analogies flying about address whether people who are enraged at Islam care about individual Muslms or mosque zoning — from Manhattan, to Murfreesboro, Tenn., to Temecula, Calif., where a Baptist pastor objects to a mosque planned for near his church. And New York Gov. David Paterson will soon meet with Cordoba Initiative planners behind the lower Manhattan community center to discuss the location. Does this sound familiar? Are we still on the post from earlier this week? Is anywhere far enough away to suit critics? How do you apply the First Amendment here?

More here:
USA Today Blogger Annoyed by Ground Zero Mosque/Auschwitz Convent Analogies

REVIEW: Fatih Akin Returns With Delicious, Exhilarating Soul Kitchen

Sometimes when I feel lost in the darkest thickets of professional moviegoing — after hacking through, say, a particularly bad patch of uninspired romantic comedies, dunderheaded action movies and twee, manicured indies — I beg the movie gods for anything that simply looks like a sign of life. But when it comes to the movies of German-Turkish filmmaker Fatih Akin, I’ve learned I never have to beg.

Go here to see the original:
REVIEW: Fatih Akin Returns With Delicious, Exhilarating Soul Kitchen