I know Emily Ratajkowski is a real supermodel, unlike all those other Insta-wannabes and professional rich kids out there, so I fully understand why she made it onto this Harper’s Bazaar cover. What I don’t understand is why she’s fully-clothed. I mean, if you’re going to hire Emily for a photoshoot and then have her wear something other than a bikini, lingerie or nothing at all, what’s the point? It’s a total waste of everyone’s time, if you ask me. Especially the Little Tuna’s. He got all excited over nothing.
Original post:
Emily Ratajkowski Should Only Be Wearing A Bikini, Lingerie Or Naked
