So the U.S. military has officially banned sales of the newest Medal of Honor game on military bases globally. Even Britain’s Defense Secretary requested that UK game retailers ban the game. Why, you may ask? Well, the game allows players to take on the role of the Taliban, but only during multiplayer. It’s not like the “No Russian” level from Modern Warfare 2, where you’re gunning down civilians in an airport. I would definitely understand if you play as the Taliban in single player and are killing U.S. and Coalition forces, but in this case, you’re not. I ask this: “What is the real reason why people are angered over having the Taliban as a playable option?” As history shows, there have been many games allowing players to take on the roles of some not so popular factions. I believe a major cause of the controversy is from it being time-sensitive related. What I mean by that is that there hasn’t been time for the dust to settle on the constant war against the Taliban. With that said, is it more acceptable to play as a German in a World War II game than as a Taliban in a modern combat game because the war is still ongoing? http://nerdreactor.com/2010/09/07/does-medal-of-honor-deserve-to-be-banned-by-th… added by: NerdReactorTV
Name That Celebrity Smile!
Breaking Sports Video
-
Hot Celebrities
-
Tags
api appid art bennyhollywood black celebrity gossip black celebrity news car celeb news Celebrity Gossip Celebrity News context detected Entertainment extraction Gossip Hollywood hollywood-news hollywood update House instagram invalid life live missing Mtv Music music-news national News news article news update Nsfw online Photos Pictures Sex show stars time TMZ update video Videos white Yahoo