Tag Archives: professor-edgar

Israel stations nuclear missile subs off Iran – Times Online

Three German-built Israeli submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles are to be deployed in the Gulf near the Iranian coastline. The first has been sent in response to Israeli fears that ballistic missiles developed by Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, a political and military organisation in Lebanon, could hit sites in Israel, including air bases and missile launchers. The submarines of Flotilla 7 — Dolphin, Tekuma and Leviathan — have visited the Gulf before. But the decision has now been taken to ensure a permanent presence of at least one of the vessels. The flotilla’s commander, identified only as “Colonel O”, told an Israeli newspaper: “We are an underwater assault force. We’re operating deep and far, very far, from our borders.” Each of the submarines has a crew of 35 to 50, commanded by a colonel capable of launching a nuclear cruise missile. The vessels can remain at sea for about 50 days and stay submerged up to 1,150ft below the surface for at least a week. Some of the cruise missiles are equipped with the most advanced nuclear warheads in the Israeli arsenal. The deployment is designed to act as a deterrent, gather intelligence and potentially to land Mossad agents. “We’re a solid base for collecting sensitive information, as we can stay for a long time in one place,” said a flotilla officer. The submarines could be used if Iran continues its programme to produce a nuclear bomb. “The 1,500km range of the submarines’ cruise missiles can reach any target in Iran,” said a navy officer. Apparently responding to the Israeli activity, an Iranian admiral said: “Anyone who wishes to do an evil act in the Persian Gulf will receive a forceful response from us.” Israel’s urgent need to deter the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah alliance was demonstrated last month. Ehud Barak, the defence minister, was said to have shown President Barack Obama classified satellite images of a convoy of ballistic missiles leaving Syria on the way to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Binyamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, will emphasise the danger to Obama in Washington this week. Tel Aviv, Israel’s business and defence centre, remains the most threatened city in the world, said one expert. “There are more missiles per square foot targeting Tel Aviv than any other city,” he said. added by: Monkey_Films

STOP THE PRESSES: BP cut a pipe!

Oh my how absolutely brilliant! They actually know how to cut a pipe! Getting real tired of these BS maneuvers dragging out this catastrophe. I don't think they want to cap anything, I think they are deliberately stalling to find a way to get at the oil to sell it. Are we now supposed to CHEER BP. Heck, they couldn't even cut it straight! JUST CAP IT ALREADY. added by: JanforGore

The Daily Spill: Diamond Saw Fail, BP Should Not Pay Out Dividends

http://environment.change.org/blog/view/the_daily_spill_diamond_saw_fail_and_bp_… The Daily Spill serves you up the latest developments as oil continues to coat the Gulf. Forget Plan B, C or D. With how fast their schemes are failing, BP may be soon require the Greek alphabet. So, remember that diamond-tipped saw intended to cut through that troublesome well pipe in order to cap it? Yeah, that got stuck. Most of yesterday went by before it was freed. Now, I kid you not, the company has turned to giant “garden” shears, though it’s unclear when that will begin. Don’t hold your breath. Oh, but just in case you were worried, federal officials assured us that nuclear weapons are not on the table. Nothing would surprise me at this point. Back on the East Coast, President Obama gave a serious and politically important speech yesterday at Carnegie Mellon University. He finally spelled out the obvious: the Gulf disaster should be a catalyst to pass a climate bill with a price on carbon, and also said he wants to roll back billions of dollars in oil company tax breaks – something he had tried to do in past budget proposals. He also vowed to personally whip votes for a climate bill “in coming months,” which climate advocates have urging for awhile. While Obama talked policy, other politicians did what they do best (for better or worse): made demands. Alabama Republican state senator Ben Brooks explained that “there’s nothing inherently contradictory” with a small government advocate, such as himself, demanding the very same wimpy government protect public safety. Um, sure, no comment. Democrats, meanwhile, made some more sensible demands: Sens. Chuck Schumer and Ron Wyden rightly told BP it was “unfathomable” that the company is considering pay shareholder dividends before total cleanup costs are known (the latest estimates rise to nearly $40 billion). Florida Sen. Ben Nelson, in a letter, formally asked that the military take charge, and others said BP CEO Tony Hayward’s head should roll. Some news on this should play out when Hayward addresses his investors tomorrow. Speaking of – the man of the hour has been busy backpedaling, said he was “appalled” by his own “I’d like my life back” remark and admitting to The Financial Times that criticisms of BP’s spill preparedness are “entirely fair.” As for BP’s response since, Vice President Joe Biden seems to believe the company is doing the best it can. BP and Halliburton are certainly experts at getting politicians to favor their interests. The former hired at least 27 former government insiders to be their lobbyists in the first three months of this year alone, reports the Huffington Post, and is a company with incomparable influence. In a busy donation month, the latter gave $17,000 to candidates this November, Politico reports, several of whom are on committees investigating the oil spill. And so much for a respite from new offshore drilling. Yesterday, the Minerals Management Service approved the first new shallow oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico since President Obama put a short moratorium in place. The site is a mere stone’s throw from a Louisiana state wildlife refuge. Drilling in deeper waters, for the record, is still frozen, but I’m not sure I get why drilling closer to the shore is better. At the very least, Interior has taken steps to demand more in drilling applications and, as The Hill reports, is asking approved permit holders to resubmit plans if they’d used a loophole that exempted them from environmental review. And lastly, sometimes being funny pays. Or at least being friends with funny people. The anonymous tweeter behind BPGlobalPR’s fake feed donated $10,000 to the Gulf Restoration Network yesterday. added by: captainplanet71

UN urges global move to meat and dairy-free diet

Lesser consumption of animal products is necessary to save the world from the worst impacts of climate change, UN report says A global shift towards a vegan diet is vital to save the world from hunger, fuel poverty and the worst impacts of climate change, a UN report said today. As the global population surges towards a predicted 9.1 billion people by 2050, western tastes for diets rich in meat and dairy products are unsustainable, says the report from United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) international panel of sustainable resource management. It says: “Impacts from agriculture are expected to increase substantially due to population growth increasing consumption of animal products. Unlike fossil fuels, it is difficult to look for alternatives: people have to eat. A substantial reduction of impacts would only be possible with a substantial worldwide diet change, away from animal products.” Professor Edgar Hertwich, the lead author of the report, said: “Animal products cause more damage than [producing] construction minerals such as sand or cement, plastics or metals. Biomass and crops for animals are as damaging as [burning] fossil fuels.” The recommendation follows advice last year that a vegetarian diet was better for the planet from Lord Nicholas Stern, former adviser to the Labour government on the economics of climate change. Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has also urged people to observe one meat-free day a week to curb carbon emissions. The panel of experts ranked products, resources, economic activities and transport according to their environmental impacts. Agriculture was on a par with fossil fuel consumption because both rise rapidly with increased economic growth, they said. Ernst von Weizsaecker, an environmental scientist who co-chaired the panel, said: “Rising affluence is triggering a shift in diets towards meat and dairy products – livestock now consumes much of the world's crops and by inference a great deal of freshwater, fertilisers and pesticides.” Both energy and agriculture need to be “decoupled” from economic growth because environmental impacts rise roughly 80% with a doubling of income, the report found. Achim Steiner, the UN under-secretary general and executive director of the UNEP, said: “Decoupling growth from environmental degradation is the number one challenge facing governments in a world of rising numbers of people, rising incomes, rising consumption demands and the persistent challenge of poverty alleviation.” The panel, which drew on numerous studies including the Millennium ecosystem assessment, cites the following pressures on the environment as priorities for governments around the world: climate change, habitat change, wasteful use of nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilisers, over-exploitation of fisheries, forests and other resources, invasive species, unsafe drinking water and sanitation, lead exposure, urban air pollution and occupational exposure to particulate matter. Agriculture, particularly meat and dairy products, accounts for 70% of global freshwater consumption, 38% of the total land use and 19% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, says the report, which has been launched to coincide with UN World Environment day on Saturday. Last year the UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation said that food production would have to increase globally by 70% by 2050 to feed the world's surging population. The panel says that efficiency gains in agriculture will be overwhelmed by the expected population growth. Prof Hertwich, who is also the director of the industrial ecology programme at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, said that developing countries – where much of this population growth will take place – must not follow the western world's pattern of increasing consumption: “Developing countries should not follow our model. But it's up to us to develop the technologies in, say, renewable energy or irrigation methods.” added by: animalia_libero