Tag Archives: stakeholders

Zambian elections 2011

The Zambian leader said he will continue exercising executive powers, together with his vice and that permanent secretaries will be helping him, until a new government is put in place. The Zambian leader said he had consulted widely with the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) and other stakeholders to ascertain the date of the elections, adding that he had been assured that most of the logistics for holding the elections are now ready. Zambian President Rupiah Banda has dissolved Cabinet and

Go here to see the original:
Zambian elections 2011

Navajo Nation Council Approves Water Rights Settlement

The deal would give the Navajo and Hopi tribes rights to Colorado River water; the U.S. Congress and other stakeholders still need to sign off. In the latest attempt to address a lingering dispute for Colorado River water, the Navajo Nation Council voted 51-24 on Nov. 4 to approve a draft settlement that would quantify the tribe’s water rights in the lower river basin. The agreement, which still needs approval from several parties, including the U.S. Congress, grants the Navajo and Hopi tribes 31,000 acre-feet per year from the Colorado River, as well as 160,000 annually in unappropriated flows from the Little Colorado. Although it generally gives unlimited access to the two aquifers below the Navajo Reservation, it sets a 2,000 acre-foot-per-year cap on the industrial use of aquifer water. It also provides federal reserved rights, meaning that the right to the water is not lost in case of non-use. In comparison, most western appropriations fall under the ‘use-it-or-lose-it’ doctrine of beneficial use. The agreement proposes the construction of three new pipelines, at an estimated total cost of $680 million, to bring water to areas of the reservation with inadequate supplies. The Western Navajo pipeline, the largest of the three, will divert surface water; the others will pump from the Coconino and Navajo aquifers. Based on past settlements, it may be years before the surface water claims are delivered to the Navajo, whose reservation spreads across parts of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. In 2005, for example, the tribe and the state of New Mexico agreed to a rights settlement to water in the San Juan Basin, but Congress did not pass the bill until 2009. Accessing the water requires the construction of the $870 million Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project, for which Congress has allocated only $3 million to date. The 2005 agreement stipulates that it be completed by the end of 2024. The settlement passed by the council last week is one of several pending water rights claims, said Gil Arviso, vice chairman of the Navajo Nation Water Rights Council. The 31,000 acre-feet will serve Navajo lands in the western area of the lower basin of the Colorado River. Settlements still need to be worked out for tribal lands in the Upper Colorado Basin and in Utah, Arviso said. Navajo Nation President Joe Shirley Jr. is expected to sign the agreement, which then needs to be approved by the Hopi Tribe, Arizona water stakeholders and the U.S. Congress. Yet, not all members of the Navajo Council were satisfied with the decision. Council member Hope MacDonald Lone Tree was upset that use of the water was tied to federal funds for a delivery system. “There is no funding for these proposed pipelines,” MacDonald said, according to a council press release. “Yet, we just agreed to give away our water to all the coyotes who have been stealing it from our people and Nation for years. As far as I’m concerned, all the waters that flow off and within the Four Sacred Mountains are ours. We should never shortchange our future generations by leaving them no tools for survival.” added by: JanforGore

No rush to commit to split innings, insists Cricket Australia

• Format review ‘still a work in progress’ • ‘We need to ensure that ideas are practical and acceptable’ Cricket Australia will not rush into finalising its proposed revamp of the domestic one-day game. CA last week announced it would trial a split innings format in the Ford Ranger Cup with the long-term view of introducing it to one-day internationals. But players, including Mike Hussey and Ricky Ponting, said they would rather have the 50-over format retained. The CA chief executive, James Sutherland, said Australian and state players would be given a chance to provide their feedback on split-innings one-day cricket. “We will show players, including those now on the tour of England, the public research,” he said. “Cricket-lovers say that ODI cricket captures the broadest interest of the three formats, and it is supported with strong passion, but it is a game that needs better positioning and a format review if it is to remain popular in the long-term. “There has been a lot of public discussion since the CA board last week approved we go ahead with a format review, but this is still a work in progress. “The idea of split innings was popular with fans and we are keen at this stage to look at a 10 wickets-a-side, split-innings concept to see if it is feasible from public, player, broadcaster and commercial partners’ points of view. “We accept that we need to listen to what the public wants but we also need to be sure that ideas are practical, and most important, are acceptable to world cricket and capable in the long-term of being considered for international cricket.” Ponting, the Australia one-day captain, said he was against moving away from the traditional 50-overs-each match. “Personally, I wouldn’t like to see it go that way. I would like to see it remain as a traditional game of cricket,” he said. Forty wickets in the game, it almost goes away from the game of cricket. “I know Cricket Australia will be talking to the players and all the stakeholders involved in Australian cricket to come up with what they think is going to be the best set of playing conditions for the revamped competition that is going to start in Australia. “That’s where it is at the moment. There’s been a little bit of discussion around our team about that and what are the best playing conditions for the new format, and all that will come out in the wash over the next couple of weeks. As long as the players are well informed and involved in that decision-making then I’m sure the best result will be achieved.” Australia Cricket Team Cricket guardian.co.uk

Original post:
No rush to commit to split innings, insists Cricket Australia