Unintended changes in GM rice and maize disprove "substantial equivalence"

In North America [as elsewhere] GM crops have been evaluated for safety based on superstition and the use of the magic words 'substantial equivalence'. The paper below shows how the numerous real differences between GM and conventional crops can be evaluated scientifically. — — 2.Unintended Compositional Changes in Transgenic Rice Seeds (Oryza sativa L.) Studied by Spectral and Chromatographic Analysis Coupled with Chemometrics Methods Zhe Jiao†, Xiao-xi Si†, Gong-ke Li*†, Zhuo-min Zhang† and Xin-ping Xu

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *