Tag Archives: deliver-on-its

Dear Bossip: I’m Attractive, I Have Four Degrees & A Great Career, But I Can’t Find That One Guy

Dear Bossip , I just read your response to “Dumb Educated Bird,” and it really touched me. I can somewhat relate to her story! I’m an Ivy League alumni with four degrees and I’m making almost six figures as a 27 year old. My issue is that I’m in my 20s, not married, no kids, and live alone. I am an attractive female, but I tend to attract men who I cannot relate with. I tend to attract very handsome BASIC men (e.g. high school dropouts, no college education, the unemployed, drug addicts, gangsters, baby daddies, minimum wage working men, etc), UGLY educated men, or non-black educated men. I also attract professional actors, athletes, and artists. I remain friends with some of these men because I know in my heart I will never be emotionally attached to them because I cannot relate to them and they’re just not my type. I find myself VERY attracted to corporate black men because we share so much in common (e.g. work ethic, career goals, education, ambition, morals, etc). I met a couple, but they were either into non-black woman, “suspect,” married, or had a girlfriend. I haven’t been in a serious relationship in seven years and it’s starting to bother me. I just don’t want to settle for something less and end up like “Dumb Educated Bird.” What would be your advice? – Lonely Girl Dear Ms. Lonely Girl, This is perplexing, and I know the dating scene may seem daunting and cumbersome, however, I wonder if your standards may be too high, or, if you’re not willing to expand your dating horizons. Granted, you deserve to have a man to match you on every level (e.g. work ethic, career goals, education, ambition, morals, etc.), however, what happens when a man doesn’t meet one of your requirements? Do you quickly throw him to the waste side because he’s lacking in one area? What if he doesn’t have four degrees, but have two? What if his career goals are not to be CEO, but he is content being a senior level manager? What if he doesn’t want to have children? What if he has all of the requirements but may be slightly overweight, not that attractive, or non-black? I think if you relax on your expectations that you will meet some really great men, and who knows what they may bring to the table. Yes, you deserve quality, and if they are quality men, then why discount them if he is blue collar worker? You didn’t mention what city you lived in, and how you tend to meet these handsome BASIC men, but I wonder if it has something to do with where you’re socializing. I’m sure that a very attractive woman such as yourself with an Ivy League education, four degrees, making nearly six figures, with no kids, living alone, and not married must be socializing in the Hamptons, Martha’s Vineyard, or perhaps the Cayman Islands. I know the number of invitations you receive to high society events at various museums, Operas, charity balls, and black tie events surely must introduce you to some very handsome, smart, educated, career-oriented, ambitious, available corporate black men. (I’m being snarky). These Hollywood movies are going to get some of you women in trouble. I swear you watch these movies and think that is how life really is. The beautiful executive woman meets a gorgeous handsome corporate man and fall in love and live happily ever after. Hold out for that if you want, and you will continue to find yourself alone. So, here’s what you can do: All of those men you have as friends that you were not attracted to, well, I’m certain they have male friends. If you receive an invitation to hang out with any one of them and a group of his friends, then invite some of your girl friends and go hang out. It will open your access to the dating pool of men, and you never know who he may know, or who one of his friends may happen to bring with them. Next, don’t discount non-black men. Keep your options open. Love doesn’t come in colors, so to eliminate a pool of available men based on color only limits you. Besides, there is nothing wrong with dating men of various races and ethnicities. Even if it doesn’t work out, if they are corporate men and very successful, then I’m certain they may have friends who are black. And, who knows what access he may have to available attractive black men. So, don’t limit yourself. Then, I don’t know what’s wrong with the artists, athletes, and actors. Rapper Ludacris is dating an educated smart woman who is not in the industry. They seem to have a great relationship, and appear to be in love. Besides, I know most artists, athletes, and actors prefer to date someone who is not in their field. Now, some athletes, well, yeah, they love attention, and tend not to be monogamous. However, again, keep in mind that they have friends, especially if they are successful in their own careers. I’m sure they socialize and know of some successful, smart, and educated men who are available. Finally, change your social scene. Expand your horizons, and attend more events where you are most likely to meet successful, corporate, educated men. I’m certain there are a plethora of men you can find at these events, and gatherings. There are plenty of smart, educated, and good looking men in various historically black fraternities, and they are active in the graduate chapters of these fraternities. And, I’m certain they host a number of events throughout the year in your city. Also, historically black sororities tend to host events, and many men attend these events as well. Check out these gatherings, parties, and events. And, I strongly suggest partnering and volunteering with corporate companies that are active in communities. Many men come out for these volunteer opportunities. And, finally, it’s time to attend some of the philanthropic and humanitarian events. These tend to bring out the elite, rich, educated, and society people. The man you seek may very well be in one of these places. But, it’s up to you to put yourself out there and open your horizons. – Terrance Dean Hey Bossip Fam, what do you think? Share your opinions and thoughts below! Also, e-mail all your questions Terrance Dean : loveandrelationships@bossip.com Follow Terrance Dean on Twitter : @terrancedean “LIKE” Terrance Dean on Facebook , click  HERE! Make sure to order my books Mogul: A Novel (Atria Books – June 2011; $15); Hiding In Hip Hop (Atria Books – June 2008); and Straight From Your Gay Best Friend – The Straight Up Truth About Relationships, Love, And Having A Fabulous Life (Agate/Bolden Books – November 2010; $15). They are available in bookstores everywhere, and on Amazon, click HERE!             

See the original post here:
Dear Bossip: I’m Attractive, I Have Four Degrees & A Great Career, But I Can’t Find That One Guy

Street Cred? Miley Cyrus Names New Album “BANGERZ,” Posts Up With Pharrell And Recruits Future For New Project [Video]

Someone has been reading BOSSIP! Miley Cyrus is twerking and rapping and making “bangerz” not exactly the way we’d use the lingo but it’s interesting watching her fully embrace hip-hop culture with this upcoming project. Via Entertainment Weekly reports : To promote her upcoming album, Katy Perry has been posting clever videos promising a new, streamlined persona. To promote her upcoming album, Lady Gaga posted a video in which she gets her septum pierced. And then there’s Miley Cyrus, who simply tweeted the title of her own soon-to-be-released disc. “If you don’t know why my record is called BANGERZ you’ll know as soon as you hear it,” Cyrus posted. “Nothin but #BANGERZ.” Astute readers will notice that she is spelling that title with a Z at the end, rather than an S. “Bangers” might work for an album made by her father, but for Miley Cyrus, only a Z will do. (Incidentally, she’s considering going the full Miley and dropping her dad’s name entirely.) If “We Can’t Stop” is any indication, “BANGERZ” should deliver on its title — and it looks like we may have an additional nine seconds by which to judge the album. A recent leak—titled “Bangerz” and billed to Miley and Britney Spears—sounds as rugged as we’d hope from twerk-era Miley. Whether or not the female voice belongs to Britney or Miley (or someone else entirely) we obviously can’t say for sure, but it would certainly make sense for M. to recruit B., that “one person” in her life “who gets it.” What is “it,” exactly? We’ll just have to wait for BANGERZ to find out. Not sure if we’re all the way sold on Miley the “hip-pop” star. Are you? Check out Mike Will Made It discussing Miley’s song “Stand By Me” feat. Future below: And it looks like Future isn’t the only one who is in the studio with Miley these days… Hit the flip for photos of her and Mike Will Made It with Pharrell and to check out a snippet of her Juicy J/Wiz Khalifa collabo “23″.

More here:
Street Cred? Miley Cyrus Names New Album “BANGERZ,” Posts Up With Pharrell And Recruits Future For New Project [Video]

NBC’s Engel Dumps On Iraq War, Claims Hussein Was Becoming More ‘Moderate’

On the day that the U.S. is ending combat operations in Iraq, the Today show, on Tuesday, brought on their chief foreign correspondent to essentially say the Iraq war wasn’t worth it. The noted anti-war reporter, when asked by Today co-anchor Ann Curry did, “Anything positive come from this war?” proceeded to dump on the entire mission as he relayed that Iraqis are upset that the United States “has failed to deliver on its promises,” claimed that Saddam Hussein, before the war, was “getting more moderate” and concluded that the mission was “a giant distraction of resources” and if not for the invasion of Iraq, the war in Afghanistan “would probably be over.” As the MRC’s Tim Graham pointed out in 2006 , Engel isn’t exactly the most objective analyst the Today show could’ve brought on to analyze the war, as he admitted to the Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz that he thinks “war should be illegal” and he told him “I’m basically a pacifist.”  The following is the full exchange between Curry and Engel as it was aired on the August 31 Today show: ANN CURRY: NBC’s chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel has covered this war in Iraq since it began and also as it ended. Richard, good morning. RICHARD ENGEL: Good morning. CURRY: So keying off what Mr. Gibbs just said, what Iraq are we leaving its people to write its, their future with? ENGEL: Well, right now I think Iraq is in a very, very dangerous place. It’s very possible they will have another round of civil war. In the end of his comments right there you, he was talking about the political accord between Sunni, Shiites and Kurds that helped to bring some security gains. That accord is calling apart right now. CURRY: So how fragile on a scale of one to ten, ten being worst? ENGEL: Nine. CURRY: Nine? ENGEL: Yeah. I think it’s very fragile. I think if they don’t get a government in the next couple of months the, all of the gains from the surge could be wiped out. CURRY: Anything positive come from this war? ENGEL: Come from this war? Saddam Hussein is gone and any one, any Iraqi will tell you that. Saddam really was that bad. And every Iraqi suffered in that. And, but, but if you ask Iraqis what’s happened since then and they will complain that the political structure that was created in their country, by the United States, has failed to deliver on its promises to the people. CURRY: Meantime had the U.S. not invaded Iraq, where would Iraq be today? Where would the geopolitical situation be today? ENGEL: If there had been no invasion Saddam would still be in power. He was probably getting more moderate. He was being welcomed into the, into, by, by a lot of European countries, he was being welcomed in Eastern Europe in particular. He was heading in a, in a direction of accommodation. The, the sanctions regime that was holding in place was starting to fail. So I think he would, it would be somewhat of a basket case but it would still, it would be – Iran would be a lot more contained. So it would be a dictatorship that was trying to break out of its box but Iran would not be as dangerous as it is, as it is today. CURRY: And had the United States not invaded Iraq, would we be done in Afghanistan? ENGEL: Probably. That was a giant distraction of resources, of intelligence assets. That war would probably be over. CURRY: Richard Engel with perspective that’s very valuable on this war and many other stories. Thank you so much this morning.

See the original post:
NBC’s Engel Dumps On Iraq War, Claims Hussein Was Becoming More ‘Moderate’