Tag Archives: whitacre

CNN.com Plugs Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Magazine ‘Born of Frustration’

CNN continued its promotion of homosexual “marriage” with an online article on Thursday highlighting a new magazine for same-sex couples planning their ceremonies. Writer Shaunte Dunston used glowing language to describe the experiences of “Equally Wed’s” founders, as well as that of vendors who cater to the homosexual community. Dunston, a ” media coordinator ” for the cable network, began her CNN.com article, ” Same-sex bridal magazine born of frustration ,” with a flowery account of Kirsten Ott and Maria Palladino’s ceremony (the two founded “Equally Wed”). The two were the main subjects of the piece: Kirsten Ott walked down the aisle in a white strapless gown with an embroidered bodice and cascading ruffles . Maria Palladino, dressed in a white suit, waited for her at the end of the aisle with a minister. Surrounded by their family and close friends, the women committed to each other for the rest of their lives . A beautiful reception followed. It had all the makings of a traditional wedding , but instead of calling themselves bride and groom, the couple used the terms bride and “broom.” “Broom is a combination of bride and groom,” said Kirsten, who took Maria’s last name when they wed. The “broom’s” cake was a giant crab, Maria’s favorite sea animal. “It was gorgeous and realistic,” Kirsten said. “It actually stole the show from the wedding cake itself.” Both were relieved the special day they had planned for so long finally arrived . The writer didn’t mention when the event took place, but continued that ” organizing a wedding can be challenging , what with finding the right photographer, the perfect cake, the prettiest flowers and, most importantly, the venue. It was even harder for Kirsten, because she had to find vendors who accepted same-sex marriage in Atlanta, Georgia, where the union isn’t legally recognized .” Dunston spent the following six paragraphs quoting extensively from Ott about their apparent difficulties in finding cooperative vendors. In the midst of this, she added that “planning their wedding inspired the newlyweds to start their own wedding magazine geared toward engaged same-sex couples. Kirsten, a journalist, and Maria, a graphic designer, used their career backgrounds and personal experience to launch the online magazine Equally Wed.” Later in the article, the CNN writer cited from one homosexual-friendly vendor who makes rings, as well as from the “Equally Wed” founders, to portray same-sex “marriages” as no different than traditional marriage: Jeweler Rony Tennenbaum in New York designs wedding rings for same-sex couples. “Most of the time they are opposite in the likes and tastes. One might be aggressive, rugged and one wants classier,” Tennenbaum said. Tennenbaum also said it’s important to break same-sex wedding stereotypes . “It’s important not to make rings that a straight person might think a gay couple wants. Gay couples don’t need to wear triangles … it’s not about symbols, it’s about signifying love.”… “That’s kind of why we wanted to do Equally Wed. [It] was to showcase normal gay weddings for anybody that’s planning their own. It helps to have a model to look at, [to] help you feel like what you’re doing is OK,” Kirsten said. Maria said most gay weddings are similar to straight weddings , but there might be a question about which bride will walk down the aisle or which groom will propose. “Just some of the little things that come out in the details of planning.” On August 4, the day that a federal judge struck down California’s Proposition 8 as “unconstitutional,” CNN’s daytime coverage leaned heavily towards supporters of same-sex “marriage,” even going so far as to get immediate reaction from patrons of a “gay” bar in West Hollywood. Two month earlier, the network aired several pro-homosexual agenda segments as part of their promotion for their propagandistic “Gary and Tony Have a Baby” documentary .

Here is the original post:
CNN.com Plugs Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Magazine ‘Born of Frustration’

AP Revises Reporting on Government Pressure to Rush GM’s Planned IPO; Why?

Unplanned but necessary “improvements,” or induced corrections? I’ll report; readers can decide. My early afternoon post at my home blog dealt with Government/General Motors’ profitability and CEO Ed Whitacre’s “coincidental” step-down from his CEO position. That post originally noted two things that seemed problematic in the Associated Press’s reporting about the company’s plans for an initial public offering this year (the IPO is problematic thanks to Obamanomics , but that’s not the topic here). In the  AP’s original report (since revised, which is why it’s saved here at my web host for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes), reporters Tom Krisher and Dee-Ann Durbin, with assistance from Dan Strumpf, reported the following two items in supposedly relaying the results of a discussions with “Scott Sweet, senior managing partner of IPO Boutique in Tampa, Florida, which advises investors on IPOs,” Whitacre, and unnamed government officials (bold is mine): Several recent IPOs have been postponed because of concerns that they won’t get a high enough share price, he said. He also said the Obama administration is pressuring GM to sell prematurely to influence the November congressional elections. Last week, Whitacre said the elections are not being considered, and the government has repeatedly said GM is in charge of the sale timing. My original reactions to the two items in my original post were as follows: (to the assertion about government pressure to sell prematurely) “The AP’s quoted expert also dropped a bombshell — apparently without qualification — that may not survive future AP revisions.” (to the possibly contradictory assertions about who’s controlling the IPO’s timing) “(Whitacre) saying that GM ‘is in charge of the sale timing’ is NOT the same as saying ‘we’re not trying to influence the timing.’” Amazingly, the 4:51 p.m report by the same three reporters, with additional help from Ken Thomas (also saved at my web host , for the same reasons as above), revised — perhaps more accurate terms might be “cleaned up” or “covered the tracks of” — the wire service’s earlier report thusly (bolds are mine): Sweet said the Obama administration may be pressuring GM to sell prematurely to influence the November congressional elections and make the government’s controversial investment look smart. Whitacre and the government have both said GM is in charge of the timing of the IPO. So Sweet went from an unqualified affirmative assertion concerning government interference to a “maybe.” Oh, and now GM and the government are magically saying the same thing about who’s in charge of the IPO’s timing, even though it seems that they weren’t before. As legendary Yankee broadcaster Mel Allen might have said , “How ’bout that!” Or, given the last name of the statement-changing subject matter expert involved, it might be the late Jackie Gleason’s “How Sweet it is!” I’ll leave it to readers to decide whether AP’s version 1 or version 2 is more accurate, and whether version 2 might have been influenced by yours truly’s critique of version 1. If it’s the latter, I would like to formally welcome the AP reporters involved to the self-correcting (or is it track-covering?) mechanism known as the blogosphere. Say hi to Tom Curley & Co. for me, will ya? And while you’re at it, ask him how his war against bloggers, search engines , and the online world in general is going. If it’s the former, readers and commenters are free to speculate on what instigated the changes. Geez, I didn’t even cross-post my initial effort at NewsBusters. But this one has been. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

See more here:
AP Revises Reporting on Government Pressure to Rush GM’s Planned IPO; Why?