Tag Archives: capitol-hill

Congress Won’t Shut Down During The Government Shutdown 2011, But Will Have To Live Without The Special Perks

SMH: Senators would have to push their own elevator buttons. House members would go without their free gym. Food on Capitol Hill would be sparse. And the lawmakers’ restrooms? Perhaps not as fresh. Congress would feel the pinch of a government shutdown, but nowhere near the pain that would be inflicted on the massive federal work force it is supposed to govern. Unlike the roughly 800,000 federal workers who would be affected, lawmakers get wide latitude deciding who is essential and who’s not in the fiefdoms of their own offices and committees. They also get to choose whether to give up their own pay during a shutdown — an option not afforded the furloughed. “How does that make any sense?” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., who added that he will forgo a paycheck for the length of a budget impasse. More than two dozen senators of both parties took the same pledge as the clocked Friday toward the midnight shutdown deadline. House Speaker John Boehner on Friday told other lawmakers that he planned to return the pay he would be entitled to during a shutdown, In a message to House members, he noted that the Constitution forbids lawmakers from changing their compensation or the president’s in mid-term, but there is no prohibition on lawmakers refusing their pay when a shutdown occurs. Rank-and-file House members and senators make $174,000 a year, with the leaders of each party making more. Boehner receives $223,500. President Barack Obama’s annual salary is $400,000. Many members of Congress already donate all or some of their pay to charity, but those swept into office last year by the populist, tea party-tinged wave of the midterm elections are especially sensitive to the inconsistency of getting paid — more than most Americans — for a job not done. “I’ll find a way to give it back,” said Colorado Rep. Cory Gardner, a member of the Republican class of freshman that handed control of the House to the GOP. Gardner said he gave up his pay in the state Legislature under similar circumstances. “We aren’t different than anybody else.” The Capitol Hill workforce is the size of a small city, tens of thousands of people who protect, feed, shuttle, schedule, advise, clean up after and otherwise support the 535 members of Congress. During a shutdown, deciding who and what services are essential generally falls to the lawmakers, with advice from Congress’ experts on the subject. The House Administration Committee, for example, recommended that lawmakers use three criteria when deciding staffing. Employees whose jobs “are associated with constitutional responsibilities, the protection of human life or the protection of property” should be considered essential, the committee said. Three-fourths of the Architect of the Capitol’s 2,600-person workforce would stay home, severely curtailing the many services it provides, according to spokeswoman Eva Malecki. That includes limited food service and even restroom cleaning — both the public facilities and those in the lawmakers’ offices. It also means limited response to emergency service calls for help on plumbing, electrical, elevator or other problems, she said. Expect a police force big enough to keep the campus secure but severely scaled back, said Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer. That means one door open per building both for lawmakers, their staffs and the tourists Congress is obligated to admit when the legislature is in session. But since the Capitol Visitor Center would be closed, tour guidance would be mostly up to the lawmakers themselves. And if they feel like escaping to the comfort of, say, the members-only balcony just off the House floor? Lawmakers might have to find an officer with a key to unlock the door, according to knowledgeable officials who demanded anonymity to be candid. Members would have to line up for everything from elevators to news conferences, since there would only be one act of televised grandstanding allowed at a time, Gainer said. And food? Sparse enough to constitute “a mandatory diet,” he quipped. Source

Read the original:
Congress Won’t Shut Down During The Government Shutdown 2011, But Will Have To Live Without The Special Perks

Freddie Gibbs: "Rock Bottom" (Video)

http://www.youtube.com/v/H6udb3mM_04

See the original post here:

Before he hurts some feelings on his forthcoming Cold Day In Hell mixtape, Freddie Gibbs is going to keep pushing last year’s very good Str8 Killa EP. And for his latest single, he’s chosen the narrative-based “Rock Bottom” that he uses to tell the stories of folks who have, well, hit rock bottom in life. It’s no doubt inspired by his upringing in Gary, Ind., though I’m sure he’s run into similar… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : prefixmag Discovery Date : 08/04/2011 18:40 Number of articles : 2

Freddie Gibbs: "Rock Bottom" (Video)

Freddie Gibbs: "Rock Bottom" (Video)

http://www.youtube.com/v/H6udb3mM_04

View post:

Before he hurts some feelings on his forthcoming Cold Day In Hell mixtape, Freddie Gibbs is going to keep pushing last year’s very good Str8 Killa EP. And for his latest single, he’s chosen the narrative-based “Rock Bottom” that he uses to tell the stories of folks who have, well, hit rock bottom in life. It’s no doubt inspired by his upringing in Gary, Ind., though I’m sure he’s run into similar… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : prefixmag Discovery Date : 08/04/2011 18:40 Number of articles : 2

Freddie Gibbs: "Rock Bottom" (Video)

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

http://www.youtube.com/v/jAr_nPzmBMA

See original here:

Finally — a bipartisan consensus emerges! Last night, CNN’s Dana Bash reported that Democrats on Capitol Hill have begun grumbling about the last-minute leadership of President Obama on the budget, having been less than impressed with his involvement until the moment of greatest media interest. Bash says that the strategy of keeping Obama “ above the fray ” leaves them holding the bag for failure… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Evil Conservative Blog Discovery Date : 08/04/2011 18:41 Number of articles : 2

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

http://www.youtube.com/v/jAr_nPzmBMA

Read the original here:

Finally — a bipartisan consensus emerges! Last night, CNN’s Dana Bash reported that Democrats on Capitol Hill have begun grumbling about the last-minute leadership of President Obama on the budget, having been less than impressed with his involvement until the moment of greatest media interest. Bash says that the strategy of keeping Obama “ above the fray ” leaves them holding the bag for failure… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Evil Conservative Blog Discovery Date : 08/04/2011 18:41 Number of articles : 2

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

http://www.youtube.com/v/jAr_nPzmBMA

More:

Finally — a bipartisan consensus emerges! Last night, CNN’s Dana Bash reported that Democrats on Capitol Hill have begun grumbling about the last-minute leadership of President Obama on the budget, having been less than impressed with his involvement until the moment of greatest media interest. Bash says that the strategy of keeping Obama “ above the fray ” leaves them holding the bag for failure… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Evil Conservative Blog Discovery Date : 08/04/2011 18:41 Number of articles : 2

Video: Democrats not terribly impressed with presidential leadership on budget

The Official Congressional Freshmen Hot List [Rankings]

There are so many new members of Congress this year — and some of them are even attractive, by Washington standards! We’ve studied them all and plucked only the “sexiest.” And your Gawker editors have scored them, to boot. More

CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns

On Friday’s American Morning, CNN’s Carol Costello followed up on her biased report from the previous day , which promoted Catholic women posing as priests, with a second report on dissenting Catholics, focusing on heterodox nuns inside the U.S. Costello promoted the claim of the nuns, who accuse the Vatican of conducting an ” inquisition ,” or wanting to ” silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope .” Substitute anchor Drew Griffin gave a brief on Pope Benedict XVI’s second day in the U.K. 25 minutes into the 6 am Eastern hour, just before his colleague Kiran Chetry introduced the correspondent’s report. Chetry proclaimed how the Vatican is apparently ” squarely at odds with American nuns ,” and that many of these nuns ” feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life .” Costello picked up where the anchor left off: “[T]he Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns…the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained .” Costello led her report by featuring Sister Maureen Fiedler, a liberal public radio host who attended the “ordination” of seven women on the Danube River in 2002. Fiedler stated during her first sound bite, “Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women .” The correspondent continued by describing how “the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country.” Sister Weisenbeck was president of the Leadership Council of Women Religious until August 2010. She led the organization when it endorsed ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the U.S. bishops’ conference. Costello played two sound bites from the nun during her report. After reading some of the questions from a questionnaire which was sent as part of the investigations, and playing a second clip from Sister Fiedler, the CNN correspondent described how at “this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire.” She continued by reading Fiedler’s “fears” over the investigations: “Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both . She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights , something the Church now allows them to do.” Later in her report, Costello played two clips from Father Joseph Tobin of the Vatican’s Congregation for Religious, who was also featured in her Thursday report on women “priests.” He again gave mild responses to the correspondent. Near the end of the segment, the CNN correspondent noted how “CNN analyst John Allen tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders .” But Costello featured none of these more orthodox nuns during her report, such as those represented by another umbrella group of nuns, the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious. The president of the Council, Mother Mary Quentin Sheridan, expressed her support of the American bishops’ opposition to ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the LCWR. Griffin asked Costello a bizarre final question: “You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? ” Well, if these nuns want to consider themselves Catholic and appear to be Catholic, they should care what the hierarchy of their own Church says and support its teachings, something that many of the nuns who are part of the LCWR refuse to do. The full transcript of Carol Costello’s report from Friday’s American Morning: GRIFFIN: Welcome back. This is the ‘Most News in the Morning,’ and it is day two of Pope Benedict’s historic trip to Britain. There he is meeting with students at a Catholic school today, and then religious leaders in London. Yesterday, for the first time, the Pope admitted the Church failed in handling priest sex abuse cases. He’s expected to meet with victims tomorrow. CHETRY: Well, in this country, the Vatican is squarely at odds with American nuns. Many of them feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life, and the sisters are having their say. Carol Costello is live in Washington with an “A.M. Original” for us this morning. Hey, Carol. CAROL COSTELLO: Good morning- CHETRY: So what’s going on with the Vatican and the nuns? COSTELLO: Well, Kiran, the Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns. The latest round of ‘visitations’ are now underway, and the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained. SISTER MAUREEN FIEDLER: Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women. COSTELLO (voice-over): On Sister Maureen Fielder’s Washington radio show- FIEDLER: Could they be serious? COSTELLO: The role of women in the Catholic Church is a popular one. The talk has been heated ever since the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country. SISTER MARLENE WEISENBECK, LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE OF WOMEN RELIGIOUS: We weren’t quite expecting to walk into this kind of a process that would test our authenticity and our integrity. COSTELLO: One of the investigations involved a two-part questionnaire consisting of 120 detailed questions like, ‘What is the process for responding to sisters who dissent publicly from Church teaching and discipline?’ ‘How does the matter of the dress of your sisters lend to the dignity and simplicity of your vocation?’ And this, ‘What are the procedures for dealing with matters such as civil disobedience, criminal activity, sexual improprieties, et cetera?’ FIEDLER: I think they want to be able to control what nuns do. They- you know, in every aspect of their lives. COSTELLO: (women singing) At this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious, some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Okay. Are we ready for prayer? COSTELLO: Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both. She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights, something the Church now allows them to do. FATHER JOSEPH TOBIN, CONGREGATION FOR RELIGIOUS: Some of it might be a very deep seeded misunderstanding. COSTELLO: The Vatican is hoping that Father Tobin, who was just appointed the number two official for religious life, can help calm the fear surrounding these investigations. TOBIN: There is a need for a dialogue, and I think dialogue means that the two parties are honestly conversing in search of the truth. COSTELLO: Sister Marlene hopes that’s true, but- WEISENBECK: There is no turning back. I don’t think that that happens in any kind of living organism. God doesn’t turn the Church- doesn’t turn creation in opposite directions. COSTELLO (live): In other words, there is no turning back the clock for American nuns. Our CNN analyst, John Allen, tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders. And many, Kiran, are even willing to return to wearing habits, although, convents- maybe not so much. CHETRY: That’s interesting. And what is the fallout, if anything, about boycotting all or part of that questionnaire you were referring to? COSTELLO: You know, we don’t know. Everything surrounding these investigations is quite mysterious. The Vatican isn’t talking much about it. But they’re hoping that Father Tobin can calm fears and get more nuns to answer the questionnaires and also to answer- you know, there are going to be people from the Vatican coming in and having one-on-one conversations with nuns, and they’re hoping that the nuns will feel comfortable doing that if their fears are- you know, calmed down somewhat. We’ll just have to see. We don’t know. GRIFFIN: You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? COSTELLO: Well, I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, and the Vatican is certainly aware of that because nuns own universities. They own their own property. They very much- you know, work for charity and social justice issues. They’re very much on their own and independent, yet they’re very important to the Church, because they do a lot of work inside the Church and for Catholicism worldwide. So, the Vatican wants to keep them. The nuns know that they have a certain amount of financial power, and they don’t really need the Vatican. But- you know, they’re loyal Catholics, and it’s not like they want to split from the Church or anything. They love Catholicism. So, hopefully, all will be mended soon. But these investigations- nobody knows exactly why they’re being conducted, and that’s just creating all of this turmoil that doesn’t necessarily have to be there. GRIFFIN: Yeah. Well, thanks, Carol. I mean, there is the faith and then there is the Catholic organization, and I guess that’s where the two are disjointed from each other at the moment. But it’s been an interesting couple of days- couple of [unintelligible]. Thanks so much for that. COSTELLO: Thank you.

The rest is here:
CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns

New York Magazine Columnist: Jon Stewart ‘Invaluable’ as Media Critic; ‘Most Trusted Man in America’

Lauding Jon Stewart’s biting humor and criticism of today’s politicized media, NY Magazine columnist Chris Smith called him “Cronkite, the most trusted man in America” in his piece featured on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Friday. The show’s panel largely agreed with him and emphasized that Stewart is bi-partisan in his comedy. “The right provides better raw material, but Stewart’s complaints are bi-partisan,” Smith writes in his column ” America is a Joke .” On MSNBC, Smith described Stewart as a “comedy opportunist, you know, where people do mockable things – left, right, in-between.” The show’s co-host Joe Scarborough joined Smith in diffusing the myth that Stewart is a raging liberal. “Over the past year, he’s been every bit as tough on the Obama administration as Republicans on Capitol Hill,” he asserted.   The panel seemed to agree that Stewart is hilarious, but pressed about the anger that lies underneath his cynicism. Smith affirmed this. “Oh, no question, that’s what gives [his humor] weight and bite, and you know, he admits to being angry every day, and the show gives him the catharsis, you know, it gives him the chance to point things out. And it’s not just anger for the sake of anger.” Smith added that Stewart’s angry criticisms sometimes pass for reporting as well. “You know, he did something three, four weeks ago that maybe you guys covered – I certainly didn’t….But pointing out that Fox has been taking all these shots at the mosque, and who’s funding it – and then they go and do their homework to say well, NewsCorp’s second-largest investor is a Saudi prince. You know, that’s reporting as much as it is anger or humor.” A transcript of highlights from the segment, which aired on September 17, at 7:42 a.m. EDT, is as follows: CHRIS SMITH, columnist, New York magazine: Some things that have happened in the real world, many of them not funny, have given him openings. And the polarization of media – you know, cable channels, Fox obviously the biggest culprit, has given Stewart a middle to both poke fun at and sort of represent in some ways. (…) WILLIE GEIST: Is he driven by anger? Because when you read the things he says about the media, he holds the media in utter contempt, almost across the board. That includes the right and the left. SMITH: Yeah, uh, anger and a faint, naive hope for intelligence to rule the day – you know, he still thinks there’s some dream state, you know, of American political discourse where we can be nicer to each other and have genuine arguments, but have them be based on fact and not emotion. (…) JOE SCARBOROUGH: …over the past year, he’s been every bit as tough on the Obama administration as Republicans on Capitol Hill, and he also has been tough on extremists on the left as well as extremists on the right. Um, Have you – have you noted that in your piece? Have you talked about the fact that he goes after the left now as aggressively as the right in many cases? SMITH: Certainly, and it’s not out of any agenda, you know, big picture-attempt to be “fair and balanced,” to coin a phrase. But he is a comedy opportunist, you know, where people do mockable things, left, right, in-between. He’s going to go for the punchline. (…) SCARBOROUGH: And Mika, you’ve always talked about his brilliance….But John Stewart works hard, but the guy, as you always say, is brilliant. He’s one of the smartest guys on TV. (…) MIKA BRZEZINSKI: …I do think that there’s a tinge of anger in a lot of his humor. SMITH: Oh, no question, that’s what gives it weight and bite, and you know, he admits to being angry every day, and the show gives him the catharsis, you know, it gives him the chance to point things out. And it’s not just anger for the sake of anger. You know, he did something three, four weeks ago that maybe you guys covered – I certainly didn’t….But pointing out that Fox has been taking all these shots at the mosque, and who’s funding it. And then they go and do their homework to say well, NewsCorp’s second-largest investor is a Saudi prince, you know, that’s reporting as much as it is anger or humor.

Read this article:
New York Magazine Columnist: Jon Stewart ‘Invaluable’ as Media Critic; ‘Most Trusted Man in America’

A G.O.P. Leader Tightly Bound to Lobbyists – NYTimes.com

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/09/12/us/politics/Boehner/Boehner-artic… House Democrats were preparing late last year for the first floor vote on the financial regulatory overhaul when Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio and other Republican leaders summoned more than 100 industry lobbyists and conservative political activists to Capitol Hill for a private strategy session. The bill’s passage in the House already seemed inevitable. But Mr. Boehner and his deputies told the Wall Street lobbyists and trade association leaders that by teaming up, they could still perhaps block its final passage or at least water it down. “We need you to get out there and speak up against this,” Mr. Boehner said that December afternoon, according to three people familiar with his remarks, while also warning against cutting side deals with Democrats. That sort of alliance — they won a few skirmishes, though they lost the war on the regulatory bill — is business as usual for Mr. Boehner, the House minority leader and would-be speaker if Republicans win the House in November. He maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation’s biggest businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS. added by: toyotabedzrock