She floated above the Earth in Gravity and, according to Entertainment Weekly, she soared above the competition in 2013. Yes, Sandra Bullock has been named that magazine’s Entertainer of the Year. The publication refers to the 49-year old as the “gift that keeps on giving” and cites roles in both the aforementioned Oscar contender and in the comedy The Heat as proof of her box office power. Writes Entertainment Weekly of the beloved star: “Bullock’s tremendous talent and range – to say nothing of the woman’s trademark grace and good humor in good times and bad – is what earned her the top spot on our annual list of the most exciting performers in 2013.” This would appear to be a reference to how Bullock handled her marriage coming to an end back when it came out that husband Jesse James cheated on her. Big time. And let there be no doubt, we love Bullock. She’s talented, funny and seemingly very grounded. But did she deserve this honor? Over Miley Cyrus , who Hollywood can’t stop talking about? Over Justin Bieber , who continues to make headlines both good and bad? You tell us: Does Sandra Bullock deserve to be the Entertainer of 2013? No, what about Miley?!? Bieber all the way! Hello? Kanye?!? Taylor Swift much?!? Sure, I love Gravity! View Poll »
Did you think Twitter chose a bird as its mascot simply because birds make a tweeting sound? Wrong! “Whether soaring high above the earth to take in a broad view, or flocking with other birds to achieve a common purpose, a bird in flight is the ultimate representation of freedom, hope and limitless possibility,” the company said today. What’s the occasion for this purple prose? It’s the debut of a… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : adfreak Discovery Date : 06/06/2012 17:57 Number of articles : 2
“Giant engineering schemes to reflect sunlight or suck carbon dioxide from the air could be the only way to save the Earth from runaway global warming, according to a group of leading scientists. But they say that these schemes could have their own catastrophic consequences, such as disrupting rainfall patterns, and should be deployed only as a last resort if attempts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions fail. The Royal Society, a fellowship of 1,400 of the world’s most eminent scientists, published a report yesterday on the feasibility and possible dangers of technologies for cooling down the Earth, known as geoengineering.
Breaking Sports Video
