Tag Archives: big miracle

The 5 Types of Animal Movies

At a few West Coast theaters this Friday, Diane Keaton’s dog weepie Darling Companion and the documentary Chimpanzee will make room in the theatrical line-up for one more animal movie, the docufiction Otter 501 . That’s right. While the rest of the world was distracted by the latest superhero shawarma scandal , the rapidly growing field of wildlife documentaries produced a transmedia movie in a genre you might have never heard of. About otters. And in a few weeks, this spring’s primates, canines, and water weasels will migrate to the DVD shelf, replaced by their summer counterparts in Madagascar 3, Ice Age: Continental Drift, and Piranha 3DD . There will, in other words, always be a creature feature at the movie theater. Animals have always been celluloid stars: the Lumière brothers exhibited short films of horses and cats years before the first feature-length film. But the last few years have seen a flood (or is that an ark?) of animal movies. The wildlife doc, for example, is the industry’s newest success story. For example, Disneynature, founded only in 2008, has released four of the top ten highest-grossing documentaries of all time. The interest in looking at animals certainly seems limitless: the popularity of pet videos on YouTube, cable channels like Animal Planet and National Geographic, high-profile docs like March of the Penguins and Project Nim , and the 101 talking animal movies Hollywood released last year certainly attests to that. But while many of the animals on smaller-scale media like television and Internet videos are simply recorded and presented as they exist, the narrative requirements of feature films — a three-act story spanning 90-120 minutes — force movie animals to relate to humans so that we can identify with them as characters, or at least as narrative props. Thus, most animal movies are really about people in one of these five ways: Type #1: Animals are people, but with cuter exteriors. Recent examples : Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked, Happy Feet 2, Puss in Boots Explanation : Typically animated and aimed at children, movies about wisecracking animals are perennial favorites. Though they may retain some of their species’ quirks, the characters are basically humans in animal form — probably because lions and zebras tend to make for cuter merchandise than anatomically confusing dolls. (To watch animals in human form — i.e., people treated as pets — watch the first half of Fantastic Planet .) The feuding felines in Puss in Boots love milk and hate each other like any self-adoring real-life cat, but they also wear hats, run on two feet, duel with swords, flirt with human women, and flamenco-fight. Type #2: Animals in the wild are also people. Recent examples : Chimpanzee, To the Arctic Explanation : Wildlife docs should be the exception to animal anthropomorphism, but filmmakers seem intent on telling familiar tales about parent-child relationships. Many mammals and birds undoubtedly spend an inordinate amount of effort protecting their young, but these films’ focus on the family is likely a result of feature-length nature docs forming a booming niche in family programming. This lushly shot excerpt from Chimpanzee doesn’t just showcase animals using tools, but subtle conservative moralizing as well. Tim Allen’s dumb caveman whooping, the mention of one male chimpanzee named “Freddy,” and descriptions of the rocks as “hammers,” “heavy equipment,” and “power tools” unnecessarily and unscientifically suggest that tool use is an exclusively male activity. Type #3: People are (mostly) good. Recent examples : Darling Companion, Big Miracle, We Bought a Zoo Explanation : Humans are essentially good creatures who need occasional reminders of their better natures from innocent, helpless creatures. (Children can’t do all the heavy lifting.) In these films, animals are litmus tests for human morality: Characters who like animals are kind and stalwart, while characters who don’t are morally suspect. (Very few are neutral.) One character always resists falling in love with the dog/dolphin/donkey, but of course they fall the hardest in the end. In We Bought a Zoo , recent widower and animal newbie Matt Damon is faulted by humans and animals alike for failing to show his new wards respect. When Damon casually swaggers into the porcupines’ space, they respond with shrieks and threats, broadly signaling to their new keeper that he needs to be more mindful of their boundaries. (Damon apparently disagrees.) Type #4: People are (mostly) bad. Recent examples : War Horse, Rise of the Planet of the Apes Explanation : Philosophically irreconcilable with the previous type, the misanthropic films of this category illustrate the reality that people harm animals, even with the best of intentions. There are very few movies of this type, since they propose the radical beliefs that human beings are destructive creatures that mindlessly destroy animals’ lives, that the rest of the animal kingdom would thrive without our existence, even that animals have the right to exterminate us as a dangerous, rival species. Even before Caesar the chimpanzee (Andy Serkis) is imprisoned and cruelly experimented on, Rise of the Planet of the Apes suggests that humans are morally lacking creatures. James Franco’s scientist character is too self-absorbed to help his senile father (John Lithgow) use a fork correctly, and their screaming neighbor lacks total sympathy for Lithgow’s clearly mentally impaired character. No wonder Caesar yearns for a home elsewhere. (Clip starts at 00:42). Type #5: Animals are bad and want to kill you (so you better kill them first). Recent examples : The Grey, Shark Night 3D Explanation : In this category, animals are the Grim Reaper. Death might constitute a character’s comeuppance, illustrate the frailty of human life against the brute forces of nature, or suggest the cold randomness of bad luck. But no matter the rationale, the end (by animal bite) is inescapable. When a character dies from a critter attack, it feels like nature’s machines turning its gears. When he survives — because, let’s face it, those scenarios tend to involve macho, macho men — we can all breathe a sigh of relief, comforted by the illusion that we can fight for another day. In The Grey , Liam Neeson, a wolf-killer by trade, attempts to outrun a pack of wolves after a plane crash leaves him stranded in the Alaskan wilderness. By the film’s final scenes, however, the pack has caught up to him, and has him struggling to die with dignity. Because Neeson is the main character, the wolf pack considerately allows him to browse through his wallet pictures one last time to soft, sad music before they rip him to tiny, little pieces. Death, be not lupine. Inkoo Kang is a Boston-based film journalist and regular contributor to BoxOffice Magazine whose work has appeared in Pop Matters and Screen Junkies. She reviews stuff she hates, likes, and hate-likes on her blog THINK-O-VISION .

View post:
The 5 Types of Animal Movies

REVIEW: Biggest Miracle of All — the Actual Whales — Overlooked in Big Miracle

There’s a big old mammal heart beating softly but steadily at the center of Big Miracle , which recounts the true story of how, in 1988, humans from all over the world raced to save three California gray whales trapped by rapidly forming Arctic Circle ice. The whales’ plight made great television footage, captivating viewers everywhere; it also galvanized plenty of people who wanted to use their alleged or sort-of genuine concern for these poor creatures as a political tool or a means to financial gain. With whale-sized good intentions, Big Miracle works hard to capture the drama of the situation and also sweep an adequate quota of feel-good vibes into its wide-ranging net. But there’s so much going on in Big Miracle that the biggest miracle of all – the whales at the center of the story, magnificent, crusty beasts dotted with barnacle appliques, as if the sea gods had gone nuts with their own version of the Bedazzler  – get lost amid all the criss-crossing love stories, political wheeler-dealing and well-intentioned but inadequate rescue missions. Maybe that suits the whales just fine – they are unassuming-looking creatures, after all – but they still deserve a little more majesty than the movie gives them. John Krasinksi plays Adam Carlson, a TV news reporter doing a series of stories set in sleepy Barrow, Alaska. It’s at least a small stroke of inspiration to cast Krasinski as a TV newsguy: He’s got the rubbery-handsome face of a cartoon-character — like a human Scooby Doo — and like so many of those TV guys, he manages to look both enthusiastic and nonplussed at the same time. Just when he thinks he’s exhausted the number of stories to be found in Barrow – his missives include a report on the world’s northernmost Mexican restaurant – he finds himself out on the ice one day and, gazing into the distance, spots first one gray nub, then another, emerging from a hole in the surface. These are the three whales, unable to continue the route they’ve been swimming because the Arctic ice has formed faster than expected; being mammals, they have to poke their snouts above the water’s surface in order to breathe. Adam jumps on the story, which is then picked up by the major TV networks. It also attracts the attention of Greenpeace activist Rachel Kramer (Drew Barrymore, done up to look mousy, though not even the drab, no-makeup look can tamp down her natural radiance), who also happens to be Adam’s ex-girlfriend. Rachel both exasperates Adam and inspires protectiveness, and her arrival on the scene rattles him, not least because she distracts him from his longtime ambition: He dreams of getting out of sleepy Alaska and going to work for a “real” TV station in the lower 48. But there’s not much time for any chemistry to develop – or redevelop – between Adam and Rachel. Before long, a host of individuals, each toting his or her own kit bag of self-interest, descend upon the frigid little berg of Barrow: There’s frosty Los Angeles TV-news reporter Jill Jerard (Kristen Bell), who temporarily puts stars in Adam’s eyes; oil tycoon J.W. McGraw (Ted Danson), who’s interested in raping the land but who also harbors at least a semi-genuine desire to help; Reagan henchwoman Kelly Meyers (Vinessa Shaw), who’s dispatched to the North to make the president look adequately concerned about this big-news issue and thus secure the upcoming election for George Bush; and Colonel Scott Boyer (Dermot Mulroney), the guy in charge of moving an ice-breaking hovercraft into the area in a valiant attempt to cut an escape path for our nobbly-headed gray friends. The framing story involves a young Inupiat boy named Nathan (Ahmaogak Sweeney) who’s more obsessed with his Walkman than he is with whale sounds (though you can bet that changes). Also, at various times in the movie, assorted Inupiat characters pop up to espouse whale-oriented wisdom. Admittedly, director Ken Kwapis (director of the 2005 Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants, as well as episodes of The Office and The Bernie Mac Show ) had his work cut out for him in trying to organize all these interlacing stories. (The screenplay is by Jack Amiel and Michael Begler, adapted from Thomas Rose’s book Freeing the Whales .) And there are a few moments of grace here and there, including a sequence in which Rachel dons a wetsuit and dips into the water – brrr! – to swim with these magnificent prisoners of the ice. The resulting encounter is less underwater ballet than woman-to-whale mind-meld; as Rachel shimmies around these prehistoric-looking beasts, she seems to understand them less and respect them more, and we do, too. Kwapis wants, of course, to keep the tone light, and so he does. It’s fun to see James LeGros show up as a toque-clad Minnesota guy, one of the inventors of a device that helps get the whales swimming on their way. (It’s named, rather delightfully, the Hootkin De-Icer.) And at the end, look for a Sarah Palin cameo, thanks to the wonders of vintage video footage. Big Miracle is harmless and big-hearted, and it’s also handsomely shot (by the reliable John Bailey). But it could use a lot more bite. The battle for the whales, who become PR pawns in the process of just trying to survive, isn’t sharply delineated: Everyone wants a piece of these poor guys for their own gain, but the movie underplays that angle –by the windup, everybody forgets their differences and winds up in a group hug. And the victory for the whales, in the end, is bittersweet. Their story has more pathos and depth and nuance than that of the humans – there’s no way to give them dialogue, but they could have had more of a voice. Follow Stephanie Zacharek on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Read more from the original source:
REVIEW: Biggest Miracle of All — the Actual Whales — Overlooked in Big Miracle