Tag Archives: fox news watch

On FNC, Tantaros Cites MRC on Time’s Stengel Defending WikiLeaks

Judith Miller Smacks Down Alan Colmes For Saying 9/11 Shouldn’t Be Commemorated

Alan Colmes on the ninth anniversary of 9/11 said America shouldn’t commemorate these attacks every year, and was nicely smacked down by Judith Miller for his smarmy efforts. Discussing the anniversary coverage on “Fox News Watch,” Colmes said, “Every 9/11 it’s become like a national day of remembrance, which I understand from an emotional standpoint, but I wonder if it’s such a good idea that every year we make such a big deal on the media of it being 9/11.”   Miller shot back, “The reason you do it is to remember why we have the counter-terrorism policies we have…We need to be reminded why we’re doing this.”   Colmes pathetically replied, “9/11 should not be revered as some kind of national almost holiday.” “It’s not revered. It’s commemorated,” said Miller (video follows with transcript and commentary):  ALAN COLMES: The set up to your question I have an issue with which is that the media actually does focus on 9/11. Every 9/11 it’s become like a national day of remembrance, which I understand from an emotional standpoint, but I wonder if it’s such a good idea that every year we make such a big deal on the media of it being 9/11. The terrorists, those who would like to attack us, and those who already have attacked us, must go, “See, they’re commemorating us again.” I’m not sure that this contingent every single year on 9/11 is such a good idea. JUDITH MILLER: I think it’s a really difficult call, but I don’t see how this country cannot do it, and wait until next year, wait until the tenth. But we must remember. The reason you do it is to remember why we have the counter-terrorism policies we have. Remember why we’re spending the money… COLMES: That’s not something just for 9/11, though. I think we need to remember that all the time. MILLER: We have ADD as a nation. We need to be reminded why we’re doing this. COLMES: 9/11 should not be revered as some kind of national almost holiday… MILLER: It’s not revered. It’s commemorated. COLMES: …because the terrorists I’m sure are saying, “Look, they are remembering what we did.” Although I loved Miller’s smack down, it would have been nice to see someone challenge Colmes further concerning his pathetic position. After all, he certainly isn’t opposed to 9/11 commemorations out of concern that terrorists enjoy them. Instead, like so many liberal media members, Colmes wishes America would totally forget 9/11 so we can leave Iraq, leave Afghanistan, and stop concerning ourselves with the war on terrorism. To people like Colmes, any reference to 9/11 or terrorism undermines their dovish view of foreign policy and national security.   Beyond this, what likely most bothered Colmes about this year’s commemorations was that they increased the resolve of folks opposed to the building of the Ground Zero mosque.  Liberal media members across the fruited plain must be hating these commemorations occurring in the middle of the controversy surrounding this Islamic center, for they might increase the likelihood this project will be cancelled.  For folks like Colmes, that would represent a terrible defeat. 

Visit link:
Judith Miller Smacks Down Alan Colmes For Saying 9/11 Shouldn’t Be Commemorated

FNC Cites NB Item Noting NYT Buried Story of Tom DeLay Charges Being Dropped

On Saturday’s Fox News Watch on FNC, substitute host Eric Shawn picked up on a NewsBusters item which recounted that, after the Justice Department dropped charges against former House Republican Leader Tom DeLay, the New York Times buried the news on page A-18 while the Washington Post, by contrast, made room for the story on its front page. Shawn: “The Justice Department has dropped its corruption investigation of the former Congressman after six years. DeLay was probed primarily for his involvement with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. It hit the front pages of the Washington Post on Wednesday. Guess what, the New York Times, page A-18.” After the FNC host asked if there was a media double standard at play, regular panel member Jim Pinkerton of the New America Foundation cited Tim Graham of the Media Research Center – parent organization of NewsBusters – by name. Pinkerton: “Oh, absolutely. As Tim Graham at the Media Research Center was the first to point out, you know, look, this was huge news at the time when they thought he’d be convicted of all sorts of stuff. When he’s exonerated, notice no story.” Below is a transcript of the relevant segment from the Saturday, August 21, Fox News Watch, with critical portions in bold : ERIC SHAWN: Well, that’s former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. He is off the hook. The Justice Department has dropped its corruption investigation of the former Congressman after six years. DeLay was probed primarily for his involvement with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. It hit the front pages of the Washington Post on Wednesday. Guess what, the New York Times, page A-18. Jim, double standard when it comes to covering this? JIM PINKERTON, NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: Oh, absolutely. As Tim Graham at the Media Research Center was the first to point out, you know, look, this was huge news at the time when they thought he’d be convicted of all sorts of stuff. When he’s exonerated, notice no story. SHAWN: How come? PINKERTON: I think it’s media bias, just a hunch. SHAWN: Ellis, you’re a columnist, yeah, what? ELLIS HENICAN, NEWSDAY COLUMNIST: Yeah, it might just be, Jim, the media. I mean, every single newspaper and television news organization I’ve ever been around spends a whole lot more time talking about charges than they do of acquittals. You might even ask Blago about that, in fact. His almost acquittal this week didn’t get nearly the coverage of all of those tapes, all those tapes. RICH LOWRY, NATIONAL REVIEW: That got a lot of play. That was an exception. Blago did get front-page coverage. JUDITH MILLER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: In fact, the media were much busier covering Blago than they were Tom DeLay. SHAWN: Blago, by the way, is on Fox News Sunday this weekend, so we can all spend some time on planet Blago. LOWRY: He’s a very interesting media story in his own right because he’s managed to make himself into a C-level celebrity, and that’s enduring value no matter what happens to his legal case. SHAWN: Does that help with the legal case? LOWRY: It might a little bit. It might, you know, help with the jury. PINKERTON: If you’re playing to one juror, as he seemed to be doing in the case, that guy who hung the jury on 23 of 24 counts. LOWRY: She hung him on one – selling the Senate seat. The others were more evenly split. SHAWN: What does it say about the confluence of the media and the criminal justice system? When you have a DeLay who was being investigated, on the front page it’s all over the place, and then it gets dropped. And when it gets dropped, you don’t hear anything about it. LOWRY: The interesting thing about the Blago case there’s a backlash in the media now against Patrick Fitzgerald- SHAWN: Mr. Hero. LOWRY: -and the tendency of the media is to soak up these allegations and just believe the prosecutor is always right. There’s a real backlash now which is a healthy one. HENICAN: Yeah, but remember that the drama is always the bigger story than the whimper at the end. I think that’s true in all cases. PINKERTON: (INAUDIBLE) …point that just shouldn’t get lost. And that is, I can remember Ray Donovan, the Secretary of Labor under the Reagan administration, he was indicted or something, couple of years of trials, he was acquitted, and he just went before the cameras and said, okay, “Now where do I go to get my reputation back?” HENICAN: Poor Blago. SHAWN: Yeah, came down the front steps of the Bronx courthouse and no one could give the answer.

Go here to read the rest:
FNC Cites NB Item Noting NYT Buried Story of Tom DeLay Charges Being Dropped

Newsday’s Ellis Henican Compares Wikileaks to the Drudge Report

Newsday columnist and Fox News contributor Ellis Henican on Saturday compared the website known as Wikileaks to the popular news aggregator the Drudge Report. Discussing the recent leaks by this atrocious outlet on “Fox News Watch,” Henican made the case that “most of us who work in the media will tell you honestly we live off of leaks. Give me more leaks,” he said. Conservative political commentator S. E. Cupp took issue with this saying, “It seems as though the sole purpose of Wikileaks is to discredit and dismantle our war efforts and at any cost.” She continued, “And I’m sorry, that’s not journalism. They’re just a collection bin for, for you know, documents.”  Henican responded, “Kind of like the Drudge Report, right?” (transcript follows with video pending, file photo):   ELLIS HENICAN, NEWSDAY: Can I stand up for leaks for one second? I mean, clearly, you can have damaging leaks in military situations, and these Jim may be causing some damage. But you know, it’s the military’s job to keep their secrets, and most of us who work in the media will tell you honestly we live off of leaks. Give me more leaks.  S. E. CUPP: Yeah, but Ellis, Ellis, look, if Wikileaks existed for whistle-blowers in the tobacco industry… HENICAN: Great. CUPP: …or even D.C. lobbyists…  HENICAN: Great. CUPP: Super. But it seems as though the sole purpose of Wikileaks is to discredit and dismantle our war efforts and at any cost. And I’m sorry, that’s not journalism. They’re just a collection bin for, for you know, documents. HENICAN: Kind of like the Drudge Report, right? 

Here is the original post:
Newsday’s Ellis Henican Compares Wikileaks to the Drudge Report